In the 9th Circle of Hell with the MSM, Obama, Mohammad and the mythical moderate Muslims.

Gore, what is he good for? Absolutely nothin! Say it again!



Ah, as they say sports, here are three easy pieces from the vast mountain of diametrically opposed empirical fact, that most of the MSM forget to er, mention to anyone. Dig. Awright Guv, anyfing for a larf, says I.


From get drunk and vote for Mccain.

"Putting Money Where Mouths Are: Media Donations Favor Dems 100-1 by William Tate. July 23 2008.

An analysis of federal records shows that the amount of money journalists contributed so far this election cycle favors Democrats by a 15:1 ratio over Republicans, with $225,563 going to Democrats, only $16,298 to Republicans.
Two-hundred thirty-five journalists donated to Democrats, just 20 gave to Republicans — a margin greater than 10-to-1. An even greater disparity, 20-to-1, exists between the number of journalists who donated to Barack Obama and John McCain.

Searches for other newsroom categories (reporters, correspondents, news editors, anchors, newspaper editors and publishers) produces 311 donors to Democrats to 30 donors to Republicans, a ratio of just over 10-to-1. In terms of money, $279,266 went to Dems, $20,709 to Republicans, a 14-to-1 ratio...

The contributions add up to $315,533 to Democrats and $22,656 to Republicans...

...the totals look like this: $315,533 to Democrats, $3,150 to Republicans (four individuals who donated to McCain).

Let me repeat: $315,533 to Democrats, $3,150 to Republicans — a ratio of 100-to-1. No bias there".


Colonel Neville: "And this is how we get the nuance in the media...Nope. Here's the have your cake and don't let the kids eat it, neo-Puritan Socialism of Obama, AKA Saint Nickleless. Hey, Obama allegedly doesn't give Christmas presents to his kids at er, Xmas. Oh, how er, fashionably anti-materialistic and weirdsville, baby. And cheap".

"By Alex Spillius in Washington.

Last Updated: 6:57PM BST 25 Jul 2008.

In a magazine interview Obama and his wife Michelle revealed that one of their steadfast house rules is not giving Christmas or birthday presents to Malia, 10, and Sasha, seven.

The couple explained that they spend "hundreds" on birthday slumber parties and want to "teach some limits". Santa Claus is still permitted to deliver seasonal gifts however.

Colonel Neville: "I caught hundreds of fish and they were thiiiis big! No, really! But they got away..."

The girls are also given an allowance of just $1 (50p) a week for performing household chores, according to People magazine. Those chores include making their own bed, setting and clearing the dinner table and putting themselves to bed by 8.30pm"

Tiny Tim: "God bless Uncle Obama and a Merry Xmas to one and all! Cough, cough! Hack! Gurk! Wheeze!"



"The London Times June 29 2001. Muslims say fresco must be destroyed. From Richard Owen in Rome.

Muslim leaders in Italy are demanding the removal or destruction of a priceless 15th century fresco in Bologna that they say offends Islam by showing the Prophet Muhammad being cast into the flames of Hell.

The row over The Last Judgment by Giovanni da Modena, in Bologna Cathedral, could threaten the already strained relations between the Roman Catholic Church and members of Italy’s Muslim community.

The recently established Union of Italian Muslims, [Colonel Neville: "They have great film nights!"] has written to the Pope and Cardinal Giacomo Biffi, the outspoken conservative Archbishop of Bologna, complaining that the fresco shows clearly Muhammad, the founder of Islam, among those condemned to burn in eternal flames".

Colonel Neville: "Merely depicting Mohammad's self-ordained reward and thus natural itinerary really. Ya gotta love a Cardinal actually called Biffi!"

"The protesters said that Giovanni da Modena had shown Muhammad being "thrown into hell, completely naked, with a snake wrapped around his body and a demon next to him about to torture him". They said that Muslims had never depicted Jesus or the Virgin Mary on the walls of a mosque.

In the letter they called for the "barbarous" fresco to be removed from the wall of the Bolognini chapel, inside the 14th-century cathedral of San Petronio.
Adel Smith, the head of the Union of Italian Muslims, appealed to the many thousands of Italian Muslim residents of Bologna to attend a rally outside the main mosque in Rome today".

Colonel Neville: "And everybody bring a plate please".

"Anti-Muslim feeling in northern Italy was inflamed last year when Cardinal Biffi claimed that a Muslim invasion was threatening the values of Christian Europe. He said that Muslim immigrants often failed to integrate into Italian society because they were determined to stick to their own ways. He urged the Government to encourage counter-immigration from Roman Catholic countries.

A spokesman for the Cardinal said yesterday that it was "absurd to suddenly discover after 600 years that our most famous treasure is offensive to the Islamic religion".

Colonel Neville: "Ah, but au contraire, nothing is ever absurd, illogical, unreasonable and dangerous enough for millions of Muslims worldwide from saying it, demanding it and acting on it. It defines their er, faith".

"There are half a million legally registered Muslims — many from North Africa — and about another 500,000 are thought to be living illegally in Italy".


Colonel Neville: "Ah sadly, the image of big and warm Italian families is long gone via neo-Socialist assisted population collapse. The Italians have few kids. That's unless one worships the peadophile rapist and bandit King, then it's 3.5 to 10 junior Jihadists.

There is some good news from the great culture that gave us almost everything though, and some of it is that there are Muslims who agree with real Italians and are thus perhaps Italians, if you can believe it. But that ain't it.

The sons of Roma have maybe finally regained their famous balls, and found their inner Frank Sinatra, and um, bulldozed a Mosque! And while throwing a bunch of Egyptian Islamists and assorted freaks out of the old country too! Islamists always like to give the free and open West an offer we apparently can't refuse. No, no. That will never do. Wrong way round, pally.

Now the kicker is that a park will be built in place of the Muslim laughing palace. And yet another kicker...it will be named the Piazza Oriana Fallaci! The Saints be praised. I loved that courageous, great, passionate and real Italian woman Oriana, and obviously plenty of Italians do too. Nel blu de pinto de blu. Fallaci de..."

Badly animated Dutch authorities arrest fun cartoonist.

Sid Vicious Junior, the last British rebel to holdout against the EU's [Eurabian Union's] total banning of free speech in the year 2000 and something. Your guess is as good as mine, Squire. Let the self-censorship begin! "I did it their waaaaay!"



“It is always more difficult to fight against faith than against knowledge”. Adolf Hitler.


”People are afraid, but when you laugh you are not afraid, and if you are not afraid, you are free”. Gregorius Nekschot, the recently arrested Dutch satirical cartoonist. Guess which religion ya get arrested for laughing at? Nope, it's not the Anglicans or Taoists!


Dig. There ‘s probably no need to control a lotta people at all really, if it can appear that a majority ain’t that curious about 'eff all really. Or a recent poll in Australia wouldn’t be able to say and even if it’s bogus, that over 90% believe the mass hysteria and scam of global warming. Go figure. If you can sell that worthless turd pie to even half the people, you can sell anything. Anything. Even the endgame of uber multicultism. Oh but it’s worth billions to the already pollutingly rich. Ironic, is it not?

“How fortunate for leaders that men do not think”. Adolf Hitler.

But then, an MSM largely made of Leftard hacks and governments, celebrities and assorted richelites that relentlessly promote such a big lie, will have some effect eventually. Oh yes they will.

“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it”. Adolf Hitler.

Roy on Pajamas Media comments: “It is humorous that you can have a sense of humor and wit in the Netherlands...as long as you don’t joke with Islam. Anything is ok to kid about or make a sarcastic comment...EXCEPT Islam.

It would be curious if I made up a religion...like MOlam, where men walked around women and told them to wear head coverings, treated women like cattle, and talked about killing anti-MOlam folks because they bother me. The creator of my new imaginary MOlam religion? Mosihammi, of course. Luckily in the Netherlands…one can still make up imaginary religions…or have they made that illegal as well?”

“He alone, who owns the youth, gains the future”. Adolf Hitler.


Colonel Neville: "Dear sports, there are some very interesting and swingin’ elements for what it’s worth, to this disturbing fiasco. The one that caught me was the revelation of a Dutch government section actually called “The Interdepartmental Working Group on Cartoons!” Ad I kid you not".

From Andrew Higgins: “Justice Minister Hirsch Ballin revealing the existence of a previously secret bureaucratic body, called the Interdepartmental Working Group on Cartoons. Officials later explained that the cartoon group had no censorship duties and had been set up after the 2006 Danish cartoon crisis to alert Dutch officials to any risks the Netherlands might face.

The group examined Mr. Nekschot's work, say officials, but played no part in his arrest. Headed by a senior bureaucrat from a national agency coordinating counterterrorism, it draws from the intelligence service, the interior minister, the prosecutor's office and various other government bodies”. Andrew Higgins.

Colonel Neville: "Think what this drivel means. While their country collapses, rots, implodes and is utterly demoralised by the logical end of Leftard multicultism, neoocialism and Islam, the authorities put a vigorous focus on a cartoonist. Yet Islamist loons in Holland can comfortably call for beheadings, murder and Jihad, and they just take another toke of a joint. Oh, and they also fund and utterly support the Islamisation of Holland. Gotta be great then".


Andrew Higgins: “Why Islam Is Unfunny for a Cartoonist. The arrest of a controversial Dutch cartoonist has set off a wave of protests. The case is raising questions for a changing Europe about free speech, religion and art. By Andrew Higgins July 12, 2008.
Amsterdam.

On a sunny May morning, six plainclothes police officers, two uniformed policemen and a trio of functionaries from the state prosecutor's office closed in on a small apartment in Amsterdam. Their quarry: a skinny Dutch cartoonist with a rude sense of humor. Informed that he was suspected of sketching offensive drawings of Muslims and other minorities, the Dutchman surrendered without a struggle.

"I never expected the Spanish Inquisition," recalls the cartoonist... A fan of ribald gags, he's a caustic foe of religion, particularly Islam. The Quran, crucifixion, sexual organs and goats are among his favourite motifs". Andrew Higgins.

Colonel Neville: "Gotta love those motifs!"

Andrew Higgins: "...He hasn't been charged with a crime, but the prosecutor's office says he's been under investigation for three years on suspicion that he violated a Dutch law that forbids discrimination on the basis of race, religion or sexual orientation”.

”All propaganda has to be popular and has to accommodate itself to the comprehension of the least intelligent of those whom it seeks to reach". Adolf Hitler.

Andrew Higgins: “...a shock to a country that sees itself as a bastion of tolerance, a tradition forged by grim memories of bloody conflict between Catholics and Protestants. The Netherlands sheltered Jews and other refugees from the Spanish Inquisition, and Calvinists fleeing persecution in France. Its thinkers helped nurture the 18th-century Enlightenment. Prostitutes, marijuana and pornography have been legal for decades”.

Colonel; Neville: “Another thang I dug, is that a Muslim creep made a lot of the complaints. So Islamist freaks in a Western Democracy are calling the er, shots so to speak and literally. That’s the end logic of PC multiculti Left liberalism, I’m afraid.

You do eventually disappear, as someone else naturally fills the vacuum of your inane self-abasement. This is because PC Leftoidism has no real core beyond the fashionable, ideological abstract and the self loathing.

Thus when seriously challenged by harsh facts as Holmes would say, it collapses like so much relativist and suicidal wet bread when it meets a stronger force, such as hey, Islam Murder Inc, or a wet kitten”.

Andrew Higgins: “The cartoonist blames his woes on what he calls Holland's "political correctness industry," a network of often state-funded organizations set up to protect Muslims and other minority groups. One of these, an Internet monitoring group known as MDI, says it received dozens of complaints about the cartoonist's mockery of Islam and first reported him to the prosecutor's office in 2005.

"We're not sure what he does is illegal, but there is a possibility that it is not legal," says the group's head, Niels van Tamelen.

Many of the complaints, he says, came from followers of a controversial Muslim convert called Abdul-Jabbar van de Ven.

Mr. Van de Ven caused an uproar after the 2004 murder of Mr. Van Gogh, when he seemed to welcome the killing on national TV. He said Mr. Wilders, the anti-immigrant legislator, also deserved to die, preferably from cancer. Mr. Nekschot, appalled by the outburst, caricatured the convert as a fatwa-spewing fanatic.

Mr. Van de Ven says he's glad to see Mr. Nekschot in trouble. The cartoonist deserves prosecution, he says, for "disgusting cartoons about our beloved prophet Muhammad, may Allah's peace and blessings be upon him."

Politicians who cry about free speech, he says, "shouldn't stick their noses into judicial matters..."


"This is serious. It is about freedom of speech," says Mark Rutte, the leader of a center-right opposition party. Some of Mr. Nekschot's oeuvre is "really disgusting," he says, "but that is free speech”. Andrew Higgins:

Colonel Neville: “I beg to differ, Jim. The average PC boob lacks the objective logic to see the true connections in their er, offence. They confuse form with subject and thus content. They are simply upset at someone holding up a mirror to the plain and harsh facts. And this time it’s the untouchable subject for laughs of the beyond Pythonesque madness, contradictory crap and absurdity of Islam”.

“It is not truth that matters, but victory”. Adolf Hitler.

Andrew Higgins:“...His predicament reprises, with a curious twist, a drama that debuted in Denmark just over two years ago...

...has followed a very different script. This time the state has stepped in to rein in the artist rather than protect him, and it is secular champions of free speech who are angry.

"Denmark protects its cartoonists. We arrest them," says Geert Wilders, ...denunciations of the Quran as an Islamic version of Hitler's "Mein Kampf."

The arrested cartoonist, says Mr. Wilders, is "a bit obsessed" with Muslims and sex, but "it is not bad for artists to have a little obsession”. Andrew Higgins.

“The victor will never be asked if he told the truth”. Adolf Hitler.

Andrew Higgins:“Islam is Europe's fastest-growing religion, with immigrants from Muslim lands often rejecting a drift toward secularism in what used to be known as Christendom. About 6% of Holland's 16.3 million people are Muslims, and nearly half of Amsterdam's population is of foreign origin. Some predict the city could have a Muslim majority within a decade or so.

The contrasting Danish and Dutch responses "show that there is a serious struggle of ideas going on for the future of Europe," says Flemming Rose, a Danish newspaper editor who commissioned the drawings of Muhammad in Jyllands-Posten. At stake, he says, is whether democracy protects the right to offend or embraces religious taboos so that "citizens have a right not to be offended".

In Britain, a local police force got caught up recently in a flap over its use of a German shepherd puppy to promote an emergency hotline. A Muslim councilor, noting that dogs are viewed as unclean in Islam, complained that the puppy could turn off believers. The police force apologized and regretted not consulting its diversity officer.

In Switzerland, meanwhile, a bombastic anti-immigration political party is campaigning to ban all Muslim prayer towers, known as minarets. This week it gathered enough signatures to force a national referendum on the issue. The Swiss government says such a ban would violate freedom of religion and pose a security threat by provoking Muslims”. Andrew Higgins:

Colonel Neville: “Hey, always the threat of violence, eh? But er, they’re “bombastic?” Better than spastics with bombs, I say! Er, but can ya say that? Nope, if a Muslimkiller don’t get ya, your own government will! Welcome to a taste of the coming Hell, matey”.

Andrew Higgins: “Afshin Ellian, an Iranian-born history of law professor at Holland's Leiden University, says he fled Tehran to escape religious taboos and now worries that Europe is "importing problems from the Middle East." He understands why Muslims, Christians and other devout believers might take offense at certain cartoons, paintings or texts, but he calls it "a matter of aesthetics not criminal law”. From Andrew Higgins.

Colonel Neville: “Ooh, an anti-Jihadist Muslim intellectual! Does not fit Left paradigm! Arrest or no? Malfunction!”

“What do we do? Quick! PC confusion alert! I don’t understand! Warning Will Robinson! Warning!” EU auto-discrimination detectorbot EU29/2008.

Andrew Higgins:“Mr. Nekschot, who calls the investigation "surreal," says, "Not even Monty Python could have come up with this." (His pen name, Gregorius Nekschot, is a mocking tribute to Gregory IX, a 13th-century pope who set up a Vatican department to hunt down and execute heretics. Nekschot means "shot in the neck" in Dutch.) Some Muslim groups have voiced dismay at his arrest as well. The head of an organization of Moroccan preachers in Holland said authorities seemed "more afraid" of offending Islam than Muslims.

"We are led by the law," says Franklin Wattimena, a spokesman for the Amsterdam Public Prosecutor's Office. He denies any attempt to squelch free speech and says locking Mr. Nekschot up overnight was probably a "mistake”.

If formally charged and taken to court, Mr. Nekschot risks up to two years in prison and a maximum fine of €16,750, or about $26,430, says his Amsterdam lawyer, Max Vermeij. He thinks the odds on his client being prosecuted are better than even but draws some comfort from recent Dutch court rulings in discrimination cases that mostly came down on the side of free speech.

Mr. Nekschot himself is very worried. "I'm afraid of getting a judge who doesn't have a sense of humor," he says.

...worried that his identity will get exposed if he goes to court. This, says the cartoonist, could make him a target for attack like Theo van Gogh...

Until his brush with the law, Mr. Nekschot was barely known outside a narrow circle of Internet-savvy aficionados. Newspapers shunned his caricatures. "They all said 'no way,' " he recalls. "They thought I was too offensive, too explicit and too strong on sensitive issues like religion."

Today, he's a cult phenomenon. Hits on his Web site went from a few thousand a day to over 100,000 a day when news of his arrest broke, he says. Newspapers that wanted nothing to do with him now print his work...and his work is currently on display in the Parliament building, where Mr. Rutte, the politician, has set up a "free-thinkers space”.

The case has also stirred much speculation in the media and Parliament about why an apparently dormant investigation first launched in 2005 suddenly became so urgent that Mr. Nekschot had to be snatched from his home without warning. The prosecutor's office says it simply took a long time to figure out Mr. Nekschot's true identity and then find him.

...his arrest suggests an attempt by authorities to soothe Muslims angry over the March release on the Internet of "Fitna"...

Officials deny any connection. The prosecutor's office notes that it has also taken action against Muslims suspected of discrimination. A Moroccan-born Dutchman was recently convicted of discrimination for writing in a blog that homosexuals should be tossed from rooftops and thrown down stairs. A court ordered him to do community-service work”. Andrew Higgins.

Colonel Neville: “Ooh, community service. Europe is saved from Islamisation! Er, nope”.

Mr. Nekschot makes no apologies for causing offense. "Harmless humor does not exist," he says. "I like strong stuff."

But, eager to stay out of prison, he's pruned his Web site of eight cartoons that prosecutors say are the focus of their investigation. Deleted were cartoons of a Muslim at the North Pole engaging in deviant sex, and of a black youth waving two pistols at a left-wing do-gooder wearing a peace sign.

Mr. Nekschot says everyone is entitled to their opinions. "If people say my cartoons are disgusting that is fine by me. I see lots of things I don't like. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder." Andrew Higgins.

Colonel Neville: "Sadly we're only entitled to someone elses shrivelled opinion now. Any deviation needs re-education. That's the smiley Left fascism for ya!".

Write to Andrew Higgins at andrew.higgins@wsj.com

Article 19. UN International Declaration of Human Rights.

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers".

President of Iran sees the image of Mohammad in a vomit bucket.

Inspired by the "Holy Chuck Soup" as it's now become known, the Iranian Minister for Raping School Girls, spontaneously pays homage to the numerous historical examples of the Prophet.



“Hassan! Come quickly! It’s a miracle!” shouted Iran’s President Armachimphead, [real name Roger Goon] to his long time companion and masseuse, Hassan the Imam. The reason for Roger's joy, was that sometime after lunch Sunday, the head Goon of Iran had allegedly discovered the face of the Prophet revealed in a simple throw pale.

And it was a miracle typical of the region. In fact, the Middle-East has more miracles per square kilometre than anywhere else on earth, outside of the Highlands of New Guinea’s cannibal regions. From such wonders as the Koran having been revealed in a humble cave to a lice ridden rapist, to every invention and discovery being made exclusively by Muslims, and before anyone else.

This includes the Chinese "stealing" all their ideas from Muslims, thousands of years before the founding of Islam, according to the Iranian Science and Goat Cheese Minister Mr Abhoub Adoodle Dhou, because the wily Chinese "knew it was coming".

According to both the President and Hassan, who like the President himself, is a highly respected government killer, Chimpy had found nestled amongst the carrots and sputum, the clear image of Mohammad. Mohammad, [last name Styrofoam] was the founder of Islam and the prime mover in making child rape a legitimate after hours pursuit.

Explained Armachimphead to the independent state run newspaper ‘Armachimphead Is The Greatest Man In The World Daily’,“Last night when I partook of that extra bowl of camels snout, I could feel I was being guided by the Prophet! "Eat of the camel and I shall reveal myself to you, said a great voice!”

The President, or Chuckles as he is affectionately known for his spiritual banning of jokes as un-Islamic, is more than the imbecile he is often called by critics. In fact, he's highly qualified. Known as the Persian Dough Boy while at University, he Majored in Kidnapping Kudos, gained an Advanced Diploma in Construction Crane Lynching and also holds a Masters in Sodomy. Currently he’s studying Goatism, a specialised course at Tehran University and Torture Chamber of Theology.

The discovery of Mohammads face in the perk container has been screened continuously on Iranian TV, run by the Council Un-Islamic Neutralising Television Station, or CUINTS.

Known lovingly by locals as “living death in a tube”, the TV broadcast shows what appears to be Mohammad's face, floating half submerged in the now holy bucket of intestinal swill. The eyes seem to be two meat ball remnants; his nose is perhaps the religiously inspired piece of camel snout, and the mouth is made of what is most likely pizza crust.

The Prophet has a beard, and this is formed largely of phlegm. Says Hassan, “Pilgrims have been rounded up all day and Allah willing, I can make a few rial a piece too!” Rial is the local currency and is unique among world monetary systems, being rather ironically pegged to the value of actual wooden pegs.

The discovery of the loon in the spittoon, has been a sensation in Iran, where people have been dancing in the streets in compulsory celebration. As one festive Burqua clad reveller stated “This bucket of puke shows the superiority of Islam to everyone and everything that’s ever been anywhere! Even outer space! And especially the Jews, whom Allah has decreed, can never have a superior bucket of hurl, because they are decended from apes and pigs!”

Sadly, most of those dancing were later arrested and executed for said dancing. Many also had to pay a "Frivolity Fine", before either being shot or hung. “No one can say that Iran is not a place of freedom of choice!” said Mohammad Mohammad Mohammad Wilson, the Iranian Minister for the Eradication of Laughter, with a mischievious giggle. In a final light hearted moment, the Minister and child killer said “...now we can say pieces of carrot be upon him!”




And now for something completely different! A satire! Er, no...sadly all too true. From Islam in Action.

'...Shiite Muslims believe the Mahdi, a descendent of the Prophet Mohammed, vanished in the middle of the 9th century.

Cantrell told us, "The 12th Imam disappeared, around the age of 9, with a promise that he would return and he would bring Islam to its total fruition as the world's last standing religion".

Enter Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. Since becoming the president of Iran in August 2005, Ahmadinejad has emerged as the Mahdi's most influential follower.

Cantrell said, "[Ahmadinejad] has stated that his mandate is to pave the way for the coming of this Islamic 'Messiah".

In almost all his speeches, Ahmadinejad begs Allah to hasten the return of the Mahdi. At a recent military parade attended by CBN News in Tehran, Ahmadinejad said, "Oh, Allah, please facilitate Imam Mahdi's early return and make us one of his supporters".

He said something similar last September just before ending a speech at the United Nations in New York.

Ahmadinejad said, "Oh mighty Lord, I pray to you to hasten the emergence of your last repository [a reference to the Mahdi], the promised one, that perfect and pure human being, the one that will fill this world with justice and peace".

A few days later, back home in Iran, Ahmadinejad told a group of religious leaders that during his UN speech, he felt a "bright light" around him.

His reactions were captured on video and later posted on a conservative Iranian website.

Ahmadinejad said, "I felt it myself. I felt that the atmosphere suddenly changed, and for those 27 or 28 minutes, all the leaders of the world did not blink. When I say they didn't move an eyelid, I'm not exaggerating. They were looking as if a hand was holding them there, and had just opened their eyes to the message of the Islamic Republic”.

Opening a dress by the Prime Sinister Mr Kevin Rudd.

While working as a Mandarin speaking diplomat and popular towel boy in Shanghai, Kevin Rudd, shown here in an official photo taken at a welcoming dinner and denunciation, [which for no coincidence whatsoever looks identical to Mao] was a natural at blending into the local Cultural Revolution. "Power comes out of the barrel of laughs", is one of Kevin's famous quotes.


[Dear sports, here’s a modified request of the week from Friday 12 October 2007.]


Kevin's speech in full to The Old Goebellians co-written with his half-brother Malcolm:

"Let me begin by saying cliche's and without any fear of clarity that this is a moment, even the moment and indeed if anyone can, let me say this quite clearly and at this point in time. I believe that this opportunity, in both the long-term and very recent tradition of what we have here today, will make it possible for all Australians to see the policies we have managed to avoid, not only through my own lack of judgement but that of my colleagues.

Instead, we have bravely opted for controlling every aspect of your lives while taxing you heavily to pay for it.

I know we all endorse none of these values fully as a community, and of course I accept without hesitation, none of the calls for my own resignation and subsequent suicide.

I can say that with non-partisanship, I can stand for absolutely anything, while drawing a responsible line at the substantial or permanent. Unless I'm spouting my enemies list of dissenters in my beyond belief Hitlerian style.

And in this spirit of welcome and neither forgetting nor remembering anything in particular, I feel as do many, regards an essential inclusiveness without any idea of what we actually stand for whatsoever and therefore, into a bright and even better future. This is really what my policies and the Australian Labour Party stands for. The U.N.

I believe that as the Leader of the U.N, er, the Labour Party, I have presented a fresh and smiling face, while underneath is the consistency and reliability that only a seething control freak can deliver.

I believe everyone from the very large, the economy sized or indeed at the cell level, now realises that due to the shelving we have put in place over the recent period of upstrangling and subsequent rigorous focusing, which have at times been difficult even while awake, means that we can now all share in the bounty of those who have actually made some productive effort.

In the same vein and following on from the latter, it’s quite clear that the direction of the non partisan and non judgemental has proven completely ineffective and can only get better. This has resulted in a more exciting, vibrant and diverse orthodoxy that promises to efficiently deliver an outcome and our own security and cultural disintegration. This I believe shows that we are almost at the end of the tunnel and if we all work together for a common goal, we will indeed. This only stands to reason, as many of you here and now are aware through no experience of my own.

It is for this reaason that I have strictly forbidden words like flawed, appalling, control freak or serial liar.

So, let me again reinforce my very strong position on completely changing my beliefs if indeed that’s fully acceptable in the current ethos of co-operation. The total loss of unnecessary confidence is fully endorsed by me and my Shadowy Cabinet, which is a great leap, yet only one leap of many towards our own and indeed the entire countries experimental something and should be applauded.

In closing, I believe deeply that if this is anything, it’s indeed something. And that’s something that I have never spoken about. I believe in not only planning for the past but learning from the sometimes hard lessons of the future, and in this way we can avoid the present.

Thank you and good luck". PM Kevin Rudd.

Derek and Clive discuss Islam Expo neglecting to expose itself.

One of the many interactive displays at IslamExpo 2008 in London. So remember folks, there's plenty for the kids, too!





[Thought crime warning!]


Derek: “Christ! I can’t stop sneezing Clive!”

Clive: “Here have a Koran”.

Derek: “Isn’t that blasphemy?”

Clive: “By all means, have a blast for me, Derek”.

Derek: “Braaaat!”

Clive: “What do you know about Islam, Derek, apart from it being a religion of peace and mayhem?”

Derek: “Well, that fucking Mohammad never gave me the horn at all”.

Clive: “Would it be fair to say that when you peruse the mighty and creepy works of the Prophet of Doom, you are sans horn, Derek?”

Derek: “Absolutely. They used to call me Allah...it was Allah all the time! But what about this er, Islam balls, Clive?”

Clive: “Well, Derek. Islam as you know is nothing if not interactive. In fact even though the vast majority of the world does not give a shit about Islam or the incredibly stupid Koran, many Muslims are nonetheless relentlessly eager to make sure that we do notice them, ad nauseum.

Sadly, this is not done via positive achievement like ironically the Jews, but by nihilistic destruction, murder, lying, whining, bizarre blame shifting and moving fifteen people into a house in your street. This can only happen if you can’t afford to live somewhere else, unlike say the leading Leftard proponents of multiculturalism”.

Derek: “Islam, eh? Anything for a laugh! So did you go to Islam Exposes its knob?”

Clive: “Yes, I did Derek, and oddly Islam was not exposed at all. Exposed it was not. It was a Twilight Zone of alternate Islam. It was the only kind of Islam, the imaginary kind, that is now compulsory to believe in because the hideous truth of Islam really is out there”.

Derek: “What were the highlights, so to speak, Clive?”

Clive: “Well Derek, due to the bogus nature of said pseudo Islamfest, there was no Beheading Pavilion. And it’s a big draw card back in Gods Monkey House. Quite frankly, I can’t stand the blood and screaming, with George Galloway shouting endlessly that “this is an understandable reaction to the hegemony of the free West!”

Derek: “He does go on, like most arseholes”.

Clive: “George Give it away as you say, is a Socialist, and ergo an arsehole. I did venture to the Islam Expo Fun Zone! No, really, Derek. This would be a new experience as whenever I think of Islam, I surprisingly never think of fun. Do you?”

Derek: “Oddly I do, ever since I was forced to do that government Cultural Awareness Programming. The interrogator, er, class instructor, Comrade Kim, asked the class what we think of when he says Islam and we all instantly yelled “Fuck off!” and “Suck shit!”

Comrade Kim explained that whenever we express how we naturally feel as a direct result of our own experience, that this is always the wrong answer. Thus we had to be modified en masse. Comrade Kim knows the correct version of everything, like The Glorious Peoples Struggle of the Palestinians. Of course it was all for our own good, he said. Now whenever I hear the magic word Jihad, I shout “Fun!”, “...and loving it!”

Clive: “Jihad!”

Derek: “ Fuck off and suck shit you rag headed heathen bastards!”

Clive: “You appear to be cured of your nasty case of PC, the intellectual venereal disease of our time, Derek”.

Derek: “It’s a miracle!”

Clive: “It’s another massively typical failure of nationalised health, Derek. Sadly, the Islamic idea of fun mostly centres around killing Jews, beating women to death and hanging homosexuals from cranes. Though they did have Celebrity Jihad. This is where various Western boobs from academia, the media, entertainment, the government and a very successful madhouse, compete for the most stupid excuse for Islamic terror”.

Derek: “I imagine the competition is fierce, Clive?”

Clive: “It certainly is Derek, especially among the staff of SBS and the ABC. Michael Leunig said that they don’t want to kill us at all, we’re merely imagining it. He said this while masturbating over the entire Age editorial staff.

Derek: “I bet Andrew Jaspin’s got a lot of spunk, eh?”

Clive: “Most of it, Derek. Waleed Aly said the reason for the Islamic terror that doesn’t actually exist because it’s our fault entirely, and we’re just misunderstanding Islam anyway, is that though he has tried to be as fucking stupid as possible, it’s still not enough. Millions of Muslims worldwide are still offended by anything and everything, and are thus forced to blow up girl’s schools, have no choice but to detonate pet markets and can’t avoid driving over children with trucks. I couldn’t really follow the logic per se, but I felt much better after I viciously kneed Wally in the groin”.

Derek: “Who doesn’t? Did they have anything Islamic worth the price of admission?”

Clive: “It would be more accurate to say that everything was worth the price of exiting. I would have paid even double the entry fee to leave. There was the 'Be Mohammad for a Day' at the Interactive Doctrine of Permanent Warfare Pavillion. This is where you sit hallucinating in a paper mache cave covered in pretend lice, while any rubbish that comes into your head is jotted down by an illiterate goat sodomist. Of course they had to leave out the rape, paedophilia, mass murder and continent wide banditry due to budget restraints”.

Derek: “Oh really? Why is that, Clive?”

Clive: “Well, the sponsors of Islam Expo, Hamas Corp, has billions of Saudi petro dollars. But most of it goes on Jihad, explosives, promoting global Wahabism, hotels, prostitutes, drugs, booze, porn, child sex slaves, buy ups, take overs, building Mosques, the BBC, Taquiyaa, journalists, politicians, advertising and George Galloway”.

Derek: “Jesus, I never realised it was so easy to misunderstand Islam! It’s a funny old world, innit?”

Clive: “It’s Burqua town, Derek”.

The closer your destination.

"Excuse me! Yes, you down there with the can of petrol and machine gun. Look, we realise that you're one of the last people alive on earth and all, which is not in our environmental opinion a necessarily bad thing per se. But it's against the latest law to use oil for anything, or to be able to defend yourself.

So we will need to burn you at the stake as a heretic against our Earth God, I'm afraid. Sorry, but it's for your own good. Er, we do insist that you smile and applaud as we roast you alive, or there will also be a fine". Mathias the reasonable.




[This post is dedicated to the great and groovy Kathy Shaidle at Five Feet of Fury.]



Cultural Awareness Training. [The Narcissistic Dialect by Dr Sanity.]

Riiight. Er, that’s PC codespeak for “your thoughts are not yet the same compulsory thoughts as the governments and various relentless control freak activists and are therefore invalid and eventually illegal”.

Dig. It’s a capital error to think that because the sum of human knowledge, understanding and rational explanation has increased enormously, that this is naturally taken up by most people, who are eager to know and understand. You know, to undo the bonds of superstition, wishful thinking and pure cant, so to speak.

“Slip slidin' away.
Slip slidin 'away.
You know the nearer your destination,
The more you're slip slidin' away”. Slip Slidin’ Away. Paul Simon.

Nope, how often do ya meet sporty chums who just have to know and understand anything much? I mean really curious? I gotta know the facts, man! Maybe they’re hiding. How long have we had libraries full of free books? And who used them mostly? Sad, lonely and pathetic nobodies, that’s who! In fact, the library was usually the best place to find me most anytime.

“Man, I had to get outta the library! It was full of jocks swarming all over the French literature section!”

Nah, the same kind of people play to the same kind of crowd mostly, and few turn up unannounced. And this is why after 100 years of the utter failure and murder of Left ideology, millions of boobs are even more hot and bothered than ever for such bunk. Spend a month researching the history of Left causes and the natural end results, and anybody without their head pushed deep into their lower bowel, would reject completely its innate insanity and bankrupt 100% failure rate.

As they say, for any Left Liberal non-idea to be crushingly discredited, just wait long enough. Ah, but they have a classic Marxist sleight of argument hand excuse for that too, as Olavo De Carvalho shows in the groovy excerpt and link below. This is the long term non-answer to any direct question. A Leftards short term non-answer to any point, is always instant subject change. [Oddly, they use it very long-term!]

Wanna destroy and enrage a Luvvie? Keep them relentlessly on subject. It's a Logical Fallacy addiction, baby! Thus they often diggest drugs the mostest. Here's Rodriguez with the very cool song Sugarman.

"Sugarman, won't you help me? Cos' I'm tired of these scenes". Rodriguez.

“Every time the Left wants to impose a new item of their program, they say it is the only way to cure certain maladies. Invariably, when the proposition wins out, the maladies it proposed to eliminate become worse. The normal thing to do under such circumstances would be to lay the responsibility for the disaster on the Left.

But this never happens, for at once the original legitimizing argument disappears from the repertoire and is substituted by a new system of allegations, which celebrates failure as success or as a historical necessity that could not be avoided.

No one will understand the first thing about the history of the 20th century, or the beginning of the 21st, if they do not know this retroactive justification mechanism by which the Left makes the people work for non-declared goals that would scandalize them if they knew their identity and that can only be reached through the indirect route of dangling the carrot in front of the donkey’s nose.

...The promise of salvation, transfigured into disaster and followed by a change in the discourse to legitimize it, has been, in sum, the constant and essential modus agendi of the international Left for a century, and we see no sign of any leftist mentor having any conscience problems with this. Au contraire, all of them continue to promise the solution to maladies, while having readied in their portfolios the future legitimization of the enlarged maladies”. The Left: Transfiguring the Disaster. Olavo De Carvalho via the very neato Brookes News.


The truly beyond belief multi hat trick that the Left has going globally is the tax payer funded Emperor Gore fraud of global warming equals global socialism; a death embrace of Islam and the myriad forms of Leftist indoctrination via our schools, Obama and Kevin love etc, the largely crap media, legislation and entertainment etc.

The mechanical, absurd and future fantasies that never arrive, except in the form of burden and disaster, appeal to the passionately and emotionally immature. They're also are attractive to those who sense they are not actually nice, generous, kind or thoughtful people at all, but are oh so desperate for everyone to believe that they are. Easier to look in the mirror that way. For hours.

“I know a man,
He came from my hometown.
He wore his passion for his woman like a thorny crown.
He said "Delores, I live in fear, my love for you so overpowering I'm afraid that I will disappear”. Slip Slidin' Away. Paul Simon.

Clive: “That’s the thing about your Left. They have a lot of feelings. If anything they feel. Feel all the time. Feel endlessly, endlessly they do. Sadly, they feel nothing for you. The great thing about feelings, it cuts out actually achieving anything, Derek”.

Derek: “Probably because I’m not fucking abstract enough. They’re all arseholes! If the Left are such a good investment, what happened to my 100,000 shares of fucking Noam Chomsky?!”

Yeah, feelings! Emotions! If it feels good to you or better still, a vast horde of you, the numbers alone prove that it must be a great idea! And who wouldn’t want to share it and get someone else to pay for it? It’s gotta work, because it never has before! Sheer ‘effing genius! A total lack of empirical proof or evidence of any kind, is evidence enough. And anyway, if it don’t work and millions die or live in misery, just don’t mention it and move on to something else, and as soon as possible.

When you’re of the Left, profound flaws and monstrous stupidities are someone else’s fault. And we know who...your parent’s! Or that perennial substitute, a Conservative government. ANY conservative government.

“And I know a woman,
Became a wife.
These are the very words she uses to describe her life.
She said "A good day ain't got no rain".
She said "A bad day is when I lie in bed and think of things that might have been". Slip Slidin’ Away. Paul Simon.

Jesus, everything a Leftard touches turns to a hideous shit joke. It’s the simple fact that their juvenile intent, divorced from adult reality, is all in the imagination, and not a very good one. They have such a wilful eagerness to experiment with not just your kids but unbelievably their own. Yeah, Islam is a real hoot. Of course it is. No, really. No. Here Alan Colmes get's called a kike by a nice domestic killer Muslim.

And this little classic:

“The Hague, 09/04/08. A primary school in Amsterdam wished to provide its pupils with an understanding for other cultures. But during a visit to a mosque, the children were told they were dogs.

With a view to developing understanding and respect for other cultures among children, primary school De Horizon regularly organises outings to various religious organisations. The chairman of the El Mouchidine mosque told the children from group 7 (aged 10) and their chaperones however that non-Muslims are dogs”. Via Hotair. What’s wrong with teaching the infidel children they are “dogs,” huh? From Wolking’s World.

“And I know a father who had a son,
He longed to tell him all the reasons for the things he'd done.
He came a long way just to explain,
He kissed his boy as he lay sleeping, then he turned around and headed home again”. Slip Slidin’ Away. Paul Simon.

Here's a nice sum up of the real goals of millions and millions of Muslims worldwide and often in the West. Dig this, at least what they let us see. Via Wolking's World.

And here's the great and prolific Phyllis Chessler on the endless willingness of many in the West to be lied to and loving it! Via Pajamas Media.

For such rhetoric prone chums of the Left, the present is never any good and the past was mostly a big mistake, except for their er, parts. There is only one way to make things better and that’s their way. But it must be all at all once and now and someone else must always pay for it.

They usually despise a healthy and real individuality while never seeming to consider any idea of Quality Control. Curiously, while always for the er, “people”, they also hate them if they show any said real individuality. Go figure. It’s an entirely nervous system based position, which is a curious thing for the detached to have. But then, I never said they were good feelings. Here's a perfect and common example of the Leftard radicals idea of er, judgement and the resulting behaviour thereof.

“And God only knows,
And God makes his plan,
The information's unavailable to the mortal man.

We're workin' our jobs,
Collect our pay,
Believe were gliding down the highway,
When if fact we're slip slidin' away”. Slip Slidin’ Away. Paul Simon.

It’s no coincidence that New Ager drivel can be defined as people who believe absolutely anything and everything but the facts. And that they also usually believe in global warming, our PM Kevin technocrat Rudd, Obama the fake and empty Manchurian Candidate and Al Gulf Stream Jet Gore et al.

They also believe utterly in restricting free speech, especially of people who have taken diversity to the unacceptable extreme of simply disagreeing with them. Hey, and the same kind of freaks invariably want to change Australia into a faux Republic sans any First or Second Amendment guarantees against tyranny. Oh no, they prefer activist judges to decide in their opinion what freedom is, and how much we can have of it if any, and at any given moment. Yeah, and in Australia and Britain we're all disarmed. How convenient. And here in Oz, the inability to defend oneself seriously against tyranny at all, was achieved by an alleged Conservative Prime Minister in our John Howard! Good grief.

Here's Penn & Teller on the inherent greatness and humanity of the First Amendment.

Whenever I listen to standard Left drool, I invariably think "you have to be kidding me!" Or gee, you "sure do make me sleepy with the things you might say". Nope, they ain’t.

No construct is ever really stupid and unworkable enough for an academic and activist to reject. No, they save their hatreds for the proven, because after all, no evidence based, effective and useful reality can ever be as magnificent and exciting, as their often literal smoke and ego dreams of moral vanity. And anyone or anything can become an enemy, even plastic bags.

Oddly though the Left almost invariably makes an exception for any actual enemy.

An old Spike Milligan routine:

Sentry: "Who goes there? Friend or foe?"

Approaching soldier: "Adolf bleeding Hitler!"

Sentry: "Pass, friend".

Just as PC Left Liberalism cripples and destroys most everything it touches, especially the mind, so it will be here and now with whatever is their latest menu of disaster and fiasco. Such irrational, hysterical unstable boobs will finish us all in the end, but don’t worry. When we’re reduced to eating bugs and berries and living under leaves, some moonbat will appear. And with a ‘new’ plan to tax and redistribute the value of your Planet of the Apes style loin cloth.

"Slip slidin' away.
Slip slidin' away.
You know the nearer your destination,
The more you're slip slidin' away.
Ummmmm”. Slip Slidin’ Away. Paul Simon.

Wuz inna name, Bub?

Support the return of Le Hammer of Toures.



[Here's an un-requested modified request of the week, from January 10 2008.]

Dear sports, a guy asked for some humorous Islamist Muslim names, on a Youtube post showing Robert Deniro as a clueless Government Official. Bob is reading out a list of wanted Islamist terrorists. Sadly, they were all sent in by college students... But said bereft Deniro is of course totally clueless, and reads them all out straight faced. How he did, I don't know. Now that's real acting, Bob!

Shocking, eh? Nope. So I wrote these daft names regards the joy of Islamism, in a similar vein. And satirising and ridiculing names is an entire level of the history of humour.

“Shocking and provocative words". Derek and Clive.

Er, no. But I did have to stop at some point though. I just had to, Mister! This shows what a "...terrible influence Hollywood can be".

The current fun state of our bogus MSM and our largely confused, easily duped authorities, means we are unable to declare a clear, urgent and effective war on Islamism and all its manifestations. And thus all we ordinary plebes and nobodies really have left, is the exposing weapons of humour, satire and ridicule.

"Ah, yes. the power of satire that did so much to stop the rise of Hitler..." Peter Cook.

Hey, "Islamophobia, meaning an irrational fear of Islam". Well, it's entirely irrational to not fear Islam. Islamophobia is the same as Naziphobia, an irrational fear of Nazism.

Or deathaphobia, or freakaphobia, or beheadingaphobia, or Improvised Explosive Deviceaphobia, or hijackaphobia, or Islamicbullshitaphobia, or a massive Mosque or Islamic school in your neighbourhoodaphobia etc.

The problem is not ours per se, whatever the current dhimmi and Taqiyaa style pressures and blatant Logical Fallacy. It's a problem for Islam and Muslims, I'm afraid. Ok I know, sadly they want to kill us all too.

We know rather instinctively that Islam is dangerous, don't we? There's always a latent threat with it, eh? You and I know that we can pretty much take the piss out of really every other religion ad nauseum, and nothing much to zero will ever happen as a consequence. Nothing that we can't simply ignore.

If this was not so, and it is very much so, Dave Allen would have been knocked off in his first TV season by two old ladies dropping a life size Virgin Mary on him. Peter Sellers assassination would have been called for by millions of Hindu’s after he made The Party, and Richard Gere would have been beaten to death, by enraged Buddhist monks with a rolled up rice paper scroll, for his sheer smug Hollywood posturing and appalling vanity.

Nothing coming from outside of reality, which is where it usually emanates from, will ever convince me otherwise that I'm merely mistaken, and Islam is really actually quite nice, Mohammad was a lovely fella and the Koran is a delightful bedtime snuggly buggly little read for the children. It ain't, unless the kids like true horror stories straight from the mouth of madness. And inside of reality, Islam is empirically and has always been a uniquely relentless vision of earthly Hell.

Moderate Islam? Moderate meaning "without ideology and willing to compromise?". No such thing kids. It just means you ain't a Muslim that has fully embraced Islam's beautiful message of love and peace via mayhem.

Like Rodriguez, who believed in Cold Fact, "I wonder, wonder I do", how long can a turd pie be sold as cherry? Maybe as long as the MSM can last. So won't cha' hurry up and die, mainstream media boobs?

And the “hate speech” canard. Yep, while I'm not a hater, if anything is possible to hate, Islam would be it. And almost entirely as said by Yossarian in Catch22...

Yossarian: “They’re trying to kill me!”

Psychiatrist: “They’re not trying to kill you!"

Yossarian: “Then why are they shooting at me?”

Apparently it’s now verboten to hate some things, even a mere idea like the fully armed doctrine of Islam. I’m sorry, but Islam sucks big time and I care little who knows it. So uh, deal with it I suppose.

“Islam! I’m loving it!”

Hey, if you can figure out all these names, you deserve some kind of citation, kid. I couldn't remember them all first off, and I wrote 'em. Go figure. It’s more of a laugh if you use a ruler to cover the answers and try to figure them out. It’s even more fun to not even bother coming to this shabby blog. Reading them phonetically, whilst emphasising each syllable helps. No, it does, really...

And remember what Bill Shakespeare said: "An Islamist loon by any other name would smell as shit". Er, that's Bill 'Master D' Shakespeare. Dig.



Ibin Bahmpin Mahsista.
(In my oppressive basket case we can’t meet girls normally. I believe that this has lead to me being far too close to my siblings)

Bin Hubya Ali.
(I’ve been up your alley. I think it’s the lack of any normal dating thing again)

Fahik Azza Barihk.
(The uncomprehending nature of many people in dysfunctional Islamic societies never ceases to amaze. The phrase thick as a brick does come to mind)

Daharda Zabedda.
(The harsher the social mentality and environment the better, seems to be the Islamist cultural dictum)

Douhbi Awnutt Tebi.
(To be or not to be. I guess the explosive belt means that you’re more in the negative nay-sayers group then, eh?)

Zatis Zaqush Dahun.
(That is the question. Probing questions are something we Krazy Koran Islamists avoid er, religiously)

Wahitz Anu Bahussi Kahat.
(What’s new, pussycat? Not much since the 7th Century, sport)

Mohammad Waiz Akeedi Fahidlah.
(Mohammad was a kiddie fiddler)

Hewaz Anaht.
(He was a nut so naturally I arranged for him to marry my daughter)

Ahnda Rah Pahist.
(And a rapist, so a bonus)

Ahnda Paou Paou Fahiz.
(And a poo poo face)

Lahif Izbutt Adareem.
(Life is but the dream of a global Caliphate)

Shah Bhoum Shah Bhoum.
(We really do enjoy murdering as many people of all ages, nationalities, religions and creeds as possible with Improvised Explosive Devices)

Akeeld Madorduz Fahallah.
(I killed my daughters for Allah because of Islam’s innate hatred of females because they represent life, hope and the natural flow of things. While oppression, murder, total power, banditry and lies are Mohammad’s only real messages and examples, and all you need to know about the true face of Islam)

Awahna Skareem Karazishahit.
(I want to scream crazy shit and I do mean, all the damn time)

Zalafs Aouhnyu.
(The laughs on you and yet Islamists have zero sense of humour. Go figure)

Zaleft Haiz Khan Nektid Wahiz Islam.
(The Left has connected with Islam as not so strange bedfellows, as narcissistic nihilist fantasists and control freaks often do)

Zah Koraniz Karouhd Turghid Shahit.
(The Koran is quite unreadable in a crude and turgid sense. It’s an insane tract of violence, murder and oppression with absolutely zero to offer anyone in the free and awesomely successful West)

Aghet Madabhout Taiddibahz.
(I get mad about teddy bears. In fact I get into insane rages about most things that make life worth living. The things that offend many millions of Muslims across the world can be narrowed down to everything and nothing)

Ahmet Aman Houwazzin Zahir.
(I met a man who wasn’t there, much like the non-achievements of Islam. Or the relentless delusions and the manufacturing of enemies and conspiracy, that Islam requires for its momentum and alleged legitimacy)

Ahmet Zatman Aghen Doudai.
(I met that man again today. Hallucinatin’ like Mohammad in a cave, eh? Yep, you’re nuts!)

Awah Ishzatman Waouhd Sihd Dahouhn.
(I wish that man would sit down or I’ll keel heem!)

Akhan Saiza Fahilhm.
(I can’t see this Palestinian Childrens Television Network film of a beheading)

Zisiz Zah Faheelfa Islam.
(This is, as Christopher Hitchens has said very accurately, “the filth of Islam”)

Yubormi Shahitlas.
(You bore me shitless and that’s on a good day. Please, no prayer chants. I’ll even pay you to stop)

Mohammad Yamutha.
(Mo hammered your Mother and anything else with a heartbeat)

Barudha Khan Yuhb Sahberadahim.
(Buddy, can you spare a dime? Or a few billion petro dollars for the local Madrassa junior Jihadist madhouse?)

Hiaz Lahu Khan Attayu Kahlid.
(Here’s lookin’ at you kid and hopefully from a vast distance or a B52 loaded with pig blood)

Grabhul Baida Wazoo.
(Grab the bull by the wazoo and that’s another Saturday night in another 'Stan)

Iziz Wahda Shavit.
(Is this where I shove it, oh Grand Mufi?)

Ishtah Haoub Id Khan.
(Is a stupid so and so)

Abhoubiz Sheiks Abakini.
(Yep, they do)

Ben Dawoud Inyah Azz.
(Blasphemer!)

Azooz Da Ahnimahl Howiz.
(A zoo is an animal house and the Middle-East is God’s Monkey House)

Osama Bin Laden Fahdinnah.
(You’re late for din dins again, Osama!)

Samah Bin Laden Furti.
(You’re late for tea too!)

Osama Bin Laden Atrahk.
(Hey, we’ve been loading a truck with explosives to blow up the girls school!)

Sahma Inbahred.
(It’s now compulsory for the majority of any Loya Jigah, Saudi Council, Syrian authority, Iranian Theocracy, Local or National Mosque Leadership and so on, to be made up of perhaps misrepresentative, inbred and stunted sub-cretins who would be dangerous losers in any successful and normal society)

Rahb Mashaft Tayabhoub.
(I’ve had both your husband and your entire family executed on phony morality and spying charges)

Yahoul Iz Rhadi Fareemin.
(Is there a Proctologist in the house?)

Dis Bahoots Iz Mahid Fahwakin. Anzats Jahuz Waht Dihaldaou.
(These boots are made for walkin’, and that’s just what they’ll do)

Wahhat Izdez.
(What is this? A rocket launcher?)

Wahak Mahdou Da.
(Show me the pleasures of the Infidel girly bar before I have to return to Saudi Arabia to live with my Mother and blind crippled Uncle)

Fahill Yabhoum Wid Bif.
(I am the local Imam)

Y’Khan Taful Amezz.
(I believe that you need to either improve your personal hygiene or avoid Lebanese rape gangs)

Anahl Saheeks Iz Bhaghari.
(Anal sex with a castrated boy is the will of Allah)

Fahkin Khan.
(Hey, that Imran Khan is a wonderful fellow, isn’t he? And so intelligent and rational too. Er, no)

Naiz Babhoul Assiz.
(Nice bubble asses on those donkeys)

Iz Arouhni Rahk Enrahl. Bahit Alahkit Lahkit. Yussah Douh.
(It’s only Rock n’ Roll but I hate all musical expression)

Allah Kahitadouh.
(I like it I do)

Wahkin Madik Ali Tahim.
(I have taken up a hobby)

Ahad Ben Zahdreen.
(I had some Jihad fuel)

Ai shahid Mabed.
(Eastern food disagrees with me)

Mashitsah Fahill Feeshahits.
(My sheets are ruined)

Fatina Yareema.
(Hey, don't tell my wife we do this. She'll think I'm gay. I'm a Jihadist after all)

Zahiba Didouh Dah.
(I feel the Koran lacks a certain light hearted and carefree touch)

Samouk Arifah.
(I don’t partake myself, but you really need some kind of medication, any kind)

Isarfid Furmiuhd. Nawidz Tahmfur Yudtusarfir Mayuhd.
(I suffered for my art, now it’s time for you to suffer for my art)

Hawizdat Furafahd.
(How is that for art?)

Izbn Ariel Drahg.
(It’s been a real drag)

Wahda Bahma.
(Oh dear, it’s another fucked in the head and alleged Islamist "spiritual leader" on the MSM)

Haouhdatz Atta Madouhr.
(Whose that at my door? I think it’s the Iranian Morality Police. Yippee!)

Atta Gaouhd Shahit.
(I see what you mean, brother)

Iwadin Furdamahn.
(I’m waitin’ for ‘The Man’ to arrest me for laughing)

Ibin Fahdin Sinz Cairo.
(I’ll never eat at Ali’s again)

Ali Sahma Ibin Wahkin Mapuhd.
(All Summer the surf has been foamin’ and totally tubular!)

Alliz Fahkt Hup.
(I’m a 35 year old man and I can’t relate to women on any healthy and mature level though I do enjoy beating them and joining in a nice ‘honour’ killing on a Saturday night)

Alouhf Bahbahrah Iz.
(I think I love Barbra Streisand!)

Mamouhd Izghay.
(I love what you've done with the carpets!)

Waihl Hah Lodarli.
(Well hello blow up Dolly)

Samouhk Aounda Wahta.
(Smoke on the water, a hookah in a sty)

Ahfiahl Bahrihti.
(I feel pretty, oh so pretty and shitty and gray)

Ouda Dasuez Islam.
(Out of the sewers and a cave came the monster of Islam)

Hiadah Dah Mezzuen Afihal Suez Sahidhal.
(Whenever I Hear the Mezzuen call to prayer, I feel suicidal at best)

Wahit Awahn Darfoulh Wahild.
(What a wonderful world is the Gaza Strip)

Sahim Bahadhi Stahoub Mabahk.
(Somebody stabbed me in the back in that old fashioned Arab way. And it’s makin’ a comeback!)

Ayudah Sharif Farum Atta Taouhn.
(Are you the new Omar Sharrif in town?)

Duzshaheet Onmashaouz.
(I seem to have stepped on some dog excrement)

Youza Wahn Fahkin Mamuddah.
(You want to have sexual relations with my Mother?)

Jahuz Chaheel Baruzza.
(Just chill, brother)

Yamadduz Adaouhd.
(Your Mother’s a dude)

Daouhd Wahiks Lahik Alahdi.
(Dude walks like a lady)

Alladin Mohammad.
(Mohammad is tryin' sonmethin' new!)

Ben Amouzalhim Izza Bahma.
(Being a Muslim is a bummer, dude)

Izzas Gaouhd Azit Sahims.
(Is as good as it seems and that ain't saying much)

Wazza Mahda Wahit Mohammad.
(What’s the matter with Mohammad? Fresh lice outbreak?)

Haiz Amahd Fahrihk.
(He’s a mad freak, so it's cool)

Ramzi Naouh Bin.
(Ram the knob in and I'll put some tea on)

Saladin Mashaftin Yahaz.
(Brace yourself!)

Aya Shah Zisiz Bahdah.
(Are you sure this is butter?)

Fatimstah Widah Hahdahat.
(Fat Teamster with a hardhat)

Balil Kalimdan Zarkhumstan.
(Clinton has ruined my dress)

Shah Dafahk Ahub.
(Please desist with your mindless rantings)

Yushaht Yakahik Haoul.
(You shut your cake hole)

Yuiz Amahdda Fahikir.
(We have opposing views)

Mabohdi Oudirh Iz Salamin.
(My body odour is slammin’.)

Wahitz Indabagdad.
(What’s in the bag, Dad? Explosives or a knife?)

Aldiz Gahoulz Arafat.
(All these girls are fat)

Izzahr Salim Gahoulz Tafhuk.
(Is there some slim girls to date?)

Masalit Izza Shahvid.
(I keep it trimmed!)

Mahass Iz Wahaks Sid.
(My ass is waxed)

Ayiza Hama Frahdahayit.
(I am a hermaphrodite)

Samah Muslimas Sahik Pervez.
(Proportionately, Islam breeds a lot of headcases)

Mawahf Izza Babhoun.
(My wife is a baboon which makes her a little more sophisticated than me)

Makidz Afrihks.
(My kids are freaks. I think it’s the public hangings from construction cranes as family entertainment))

Islam Sahiks Lahik Amuzzah.
(Islam sucks like a Mother)

Spot the smiley fascism!

"Hey, come on, man! It's not just Islam that does this! All religions are just as bad! Especially the Anglicans!" A. Boob.

No, really... Yeah, like only last week, a couple of Seventh Day Adventist old ladies came around with copies of 'The Watchtower Magazine' lifted those from a Jehovah's Witness no doubt, and said, "Have you heard the good news?"

Colonel Neville: "No, what is it?"

Old fruit cake nibblers: "We've got assault rifles!"

If it wasn't for the Smith & Wesson M76 sub machine gun I keep in the umbrella stand, they would have got me. I hit the one with the Zimmerframe and I'm pretty sure I winged the other with the hump, but she limped away.



"As he was carted off in a police wagon the funny side of Section 132 of SOCPA seemed to go with him. The crowds seemed unsettled, too. Their laughter gave way to bewilderment and shock. If only the architects of SOCPA and all the MPs who voted for it in parliament had been on hand to explain to us all why there was nothing sinister about a man dressed as Charlie Chaplin being arrested outside Downing Street for carrying a sign that said “NOT ALOUD”. Goodbye Magna Carta by Dan Kiernan.

Dear sports, read the following three paragraphs of law and choose the one that starts in cynicism and control freakery and can only end in smiley faced fascism. But don’t worry...that’s not until next week!

Article 19. United Nations Declaration of Human Rights. 1948.

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers".


The Constitution of the United States of America. Amendment 1. Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791.

"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances".


The Racial and Religious Vilification Law 2001. Australia via Premier Steve Bracks.

"...person must not, on the ground of the religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other person or class of persons”.


The Magna Carta. England 1215.

“No freeman shall be taken, imprisoned . . . or in any other way destroyed . . . except by the lawful judgment of his peers, or by the law of the land. To no one will we sell, to none will we deny or delay, right or justice".


Colonel Neville: "Congratulations! It's Australia's legislation for smiley fascism! You've won the trip to Barbados and a set of matching luggage!

Er, I don't know about you, but I wouldn't exactly rely on support from the UN, unless you're a local child prostitution ring. So as you can clearly see, the only country I can think of with authentic freedom of speech protected by a great Constitution, is the United States. And if that ever goes, ya better head for the High Sierra's, or similiar, mate.

As Nilk said, check out 2.9, but they all stink of smiley fascism. Oh yes they do".

Excerpt: “...English law has not accorded free speech the status of a `primary right' which takes precedence over potentially conflicting rights and interests (see Kentridge 1996; Barendt 1989).

Rather it has to be weighed against other considerations, such as the right to a fair trial, respect for confidences, and the protection of reputation. When striking the balance, English law has traditionally shown a strong preference for protecting reputation rights over free speech, and a disinclination to differentiate `political' from other sorts of speech”. Kevin Williams.

The Napoleonic Code is a comprehensive and detailed system of laws that nonetheless seriously limited freedom of speech via censorship of the press, books, plays and pamphlets, and the rights of women etc. It did not establish Democracy. [Via Barron’s Passware. Google Books.]

Colonel Neville: "Hey, a lot of major sites and media around the world, took notice of our cruddy law and few saw it as a er, positive. Here's a few of 'em".

Ezra Levant and the CHRC creature. “...explicit constitutional safeguards ensure that political speech is unrestricted. But our northern neighbor has no codified bill of rights. Instead, as a dominion of the British crown, Canada's basic liberties persisted for most of its history as common law traditions.

Today, they are enumerated in a Charter qualified by a "limitation clause," and hence remain vulnerable to legal challenge in ways the the provisions of the US Bill of Rights are not. Having failed to capture a big trophy like freedom of speech in Denmark, theocratic thugs are doing their best to silence individual voices like Levant's through costly, abusive litigation".


"Freedom of speech must be tolerated, and everyone living in the United Kingdom must accept that they may be insulted about their own beliefs, or indeed be offended, and that is something which they must simply endure, not least because some suffer fates far worse". Cranmers Bottom Line.

"Freedom of speech is being able to speak freely without censorship. The right to freedom of speech is guaranteed under international law through numerous human-rights instruments, notably under Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, although implementation remains lacking in many countries. The synonymous term freedom of expression is sometimes preferred, since the right is not confined to verbal speech but is understood to protect any act of seeking, receiving and imparting information or ideas, regardless of the medium used.

In practice, the right to freedom of speech is not absolute in any country, although the degree of freedom varies greatly. Industrialized countries also have varying approaches to balance freedom with order. For instance, the United States First Amendment theoretically grants absolute freedom, placing the burden upon the state to demonstrate when (if) a limitation of this freedom is necessary. In almost all liberal democracies, it is generally recognized that restrictions should be the exception and free expression the rule; nevertheless, compliance with this principle is often lacking". Freedom of speech. Wikipedia.


"Constitutional and administrative law govern the affairs of the state. Constitutional law concerns both the relationships between the executive, legislature and judiciary and the human rights or civil liberties of individuals against the state. Most jurisdictions, like the United States and France, have a single codified constitution, with a Bill of Rights. A few, like the United Kingdom, have no such document". Law. Wikipedia.

"The rule of law is better than the rule of any individual". Aristotle.

"While the Premier might like to think he had the wholehearted support of faith leaders, this is not so, at least among the clear majority of Christian faith leaders.

Dismayed both by the early indications of what amendments might be entertained by the Government and the Premier's continued insistence of faith leaders' support, 19 prominent church leaders, including some denominational bishops and moderators, and pastors of some of Melbourne's largest churches, met in January. They subsequently wrote to the Premier requesting a meeting to present their request for the removal of the civil provisions in the act, a minimalist option that, while a compromise, would have made the act somewhat safer.

This request for a meeting with the Premier was declined, making claims of consultation with faith leaders rather hollow.

The overwhelming proportion of church members, as evidenced by 27,000 signatures to a petition calling for the removal of the religious aspects from the act, consider the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act to be deeply flawed and offensive. They have witnessed both Muslims and occultists using it to pursue centuries-old religious conflicts against Christians, in which secular courts are ill-prepared to adjudicate.

This was amply demonstrated in the action brought by the Islamic Council of Victoria against a small Christian group, Catch the Fire Ministries, in which the judge in the case made the bizarre assertion that the 1 billion adherents of Islam regard the Koran as equivalent to the Bible; that it agrees substantially with Christian beliefs save for particular events.

This would be news to most Muslims and Christians. Furthermore, the decision judged the shocking material cited from the Koran by one of the defendants as no longer relevant to the 21st century - this is clearly contrary to the views of those Muslims, including Muslims living in Australia, who regard the Koran as the literal dictated word of Allah and therefore unalterable. A particularly noxious aspect of the judge's decision was that speaking the truth is no longer an acceptable defence”. David Palmer. May 1, 2006. The Age newspaper

"A campaign to dump a religious hatred law in Australia is winning growing support from churches -- including some whose opinion on the law has shifted since two Christians were found guilty of vilifying Muslims.

Mainstream church leaders are adding their voices to other Christians asking the State of Victoria's Labor government to rescind the legislation, saying it poses a danger to freedom of speech.

Victoria's Racial and Religious Tolerance Act made headlines around the world after Muslims took two pastors before a tribunal, complaining about a post-9/11 seminar designed to explain Islam to a Christian audience.

The case made waves in Britain, where the government has been trying to enact a similar proposal....

For the Presbyterian Church the outcome of the Catch the Fire case raised two important issues.

"First, are judges now required to make theological judgments under the Act and just how well qualified are they to do so?" moderator Allan Harman said in a statement.

"Secondly, and more specifically, are we to assume that Christians quoting and commenting on Islamic texts in ways the Muslims object to, will be penalized? This ability to critique another person's position is integral to a free and democratic society."

Both the Presbyterian and Anglican (Episcopalian) churches argue that the legislation has mixed up questions of religious and racial hatred.

"It was a great mistake for the government to lump religious vilification in with racial vilification," Harman said. "Apart from a very few small groupings such as Jews and Sikhs, race and religion in the modern world are not the same thing. Race for any person is a given, not so religion." Jihadwatch.


Patrick Parkinson on why our law is dumb as a bag of gravel. The University of Sydney Law School.

Here's an incredibly comprehensive round up from Australian Christian group, the Saltshakers.

And now a word from the government. Just give them a moment to pull their pants up.

More on why the law sux.

The great Danny Pipes on same.

A hip and related Andrew Bolt piece.

On bogus insulting Turkishness Muslim laws. Hey, do they mean "Hey, do you know you have a certain insulting Turkishness?!" I can't wait until the Instanbul Express reaches Europe with it's seventy million passengers. It'll be like sunshine! Gotta be, Mister!


Excerpt: "Turkey is expected to amend a heavily criticised law which makes "insulting Turkishness" illegal, in order to improve its chances of entering the EU…Breaking the law can mean a sentence of up to four years in jail.

Change of wording: Sahin refused to comment on the nature of the changes to the law before they were discussed at a cabinet meeting on Monday.

However, media reports have said that the term "insulting Turkishness" may change to "insulting the Turkish nation" or "insulting the Turkish people".

Colonel Neville: "Whatever".


Libel Law: free speech on trial by Helene Guldberg.

"...claimants do not have to prove actual harm. They just need to show that the words complained of are capable of lowering their standing in the estimation of 'right-thinking members of the public'. Those who sue do not need to prove that their reputation has been damaged - nor do they need to prove that the words complained of were untrue. The assumption is that the defamatory statement is false, and the burden falls on the defendant to prove its truth. This reverse burden of proof is almost unique to English libel law.

The defendant does not only have to defend the literal meaning of a statement they have made, but also possible interpretations. To argue that a particular defamatory meaning was not intended will not hold up as a defence in court. Claimants can - and often do - succeed in attributing defamatory meanings to statements that the defendant never intended to be defamatory.

No wonder claimants succeed in over 80 percent of cases that get to court. The absurdity of this situation was summed up by Lord Lester in The Times (London): claimants in libel cases, he explained, are able to 'obtain damages for a statement made to others without showing that the statement was untrue, without showing that it did him any harm, and without showing that the defendant was wrong to make it' (1).

With these kinds of odds, the libel courts provide some rich pickings. But only for the wealthy: the costs involved in libel trials frequently amount to six- or seven-figure sums, and there is no legal aid available for those who cannot afford to go to court…there were calls to hold those who financially support the claimant to be liable for the costs of the defendant, if the claimant should lose. But while this might curb some libel actions, it would only make the law even more exclusive to the rich.

The most worrying aspect of the UK libel law is the effect it has on free speech.

If authors, editors or publishers have the smallest inkling that the truth of a proposition cannot be proven in court (even when made in good faith), the knowledge that they would have less than a one-in-five chance of success in a libel trial means the story is most likely to be dropped…As David Pannick QC explains, 'the current state of the English law of defamation is impossible to reconcile with any developed concept of free speech.

Defendants are liable even if they make statements that they reasonably believe to be true on matters of public interest; the plaintiff may receive substantial damages whether or not financial loss has been caused; and legal aid is unavailable....Our libel law assumes that life is lived in a gentleman's club in which damage to reputation is one of the most serious injuries that a person can suffer' (2).

The K-Zone on defamation and free speech. English law has long recognized that a person's good reputation is something that merits protection, and that compensation should be paid by someone who impugnes that reputation.

A person who is a victim of an attack on his reputation can be financially damaged, particularly if the imputation concerns his professional competence. However, in most cases it is not necessary that the victim show that he has suffered any financial loss: libel (publication in permanent form) is actionable per se, as is slander (publication in transient form) when it touches on a person's professional competence.

On the whole, tensions between the law of defamation (libel and slander) and the right to freedom of speech do not arise where the imputation turns out to be true. `Justification' (truth) is, of course, nearly always a complete defence to an action in defamation. As Littledale J said in M'Pherson v Daniels (1829) 10 B & C 263, "the law will not permit a man to recover damages in respect of an injury to a character which he does not, or ought not, to possess".

It is not necessary that the imputation be perfectly true in all particulars; it will suffice as a defence if is is substantially true (AlexanderVNorthEasternRailway1865).

"Governments are stupid.

The term ‘government’ refers to a system by which a small group of corrupt assholes exercise authority over a large group of idiots. In this system, the governing body (assholes) extort money from the society they govern (idiots) for the purpose of generating paperwork, buying fancy office furniture, soliciting whores, and bickering over stupid bullshit on C-SPAN televsion. In return, they offer society the illusion of maintaining order.

Governments perform various tasks that are important to a stable society, but are difficult to perform without highly organized groups. These tasks include, but are not limited to: imprisoning and shooting dangerous people, imprisoning and shooting innocent people, issuing currency, wasting currency, giving speeches, funding scientific research, and lying to children". The Encyclopedia of Stupid.

The Secret Agents Heart of Darkness.

“It had become so pitch dark that we listeners could hardly see one another. For a long time already he, sitting apart, had been no more to us than a voice. There was not a word from anybody.

The others might have been asleep, but I was awake. I listened, I listened on the watch for the sentence, for the word, that would give me the clue to the faint uneasiness inspired by this narrative that seemed to shape itself without human lips in the heavy night-air of the river”. Heart of Darkness. Joseph Conrad.




Dear sports, this is a non-Prophet organisation! “...now when I was a little chap, I had a passion for maps”. Yep, I’ve been re-reading the two great Joseph Conrad books, ‘Heart of Darkness’ and ‘The Secret Agent’. They are, sporty chums, two of the best and most prescient books of the Western Canon. The striking thing about Joe’s Heart of Darkness', is that it describes like a multi-layered relief map, as it naturally would, the difficult, revealing and shockingly surprising journey many of us have taken regards the illumination of the truth of Islamism, Left radicalism and the evil of macrame wall hangings.

All of us who are hip to the crazy scene of Mohammad the super loon, have in some way, penetrated and traversed something ineffably cruel, terrible, blackly awesome and inhuman with as Conrad said, a heart of darkness.

Ok. "The horror, the horror!", is mostly now used as a common comic effect by the er, often naff. Curiously, the phrase still works surprisingly effectively within the context of the book. And also when one has it in mind when perusing any of the thousands of daily outrages, all courtesy of the religion of peace.

And right now, if one cares to fire up a few flares of analysis into the apocalyptic gloom of our mortal enemies, we can easily see most everything rather clearly. Islamist geeks are also the enemies of any free minded Muslims so defined here or elsewhere, who genuinely try to escape from the blackness at the centre of the memeplex of the Koranic.

So as my compadre Cappy said in my previous post, despair is a sin and we must persevere. Just don't go stark raving nutso like Kurtz!

Here again is the worthy interview with the great Bat Ye’or on the reality of Islam and the canard of a moderate majority. And another hip piece by Dr. Laurie Roth at Canada Free Press on the OIC UN group of 57 Islamic states aiming to criminalise Christianity and the free West.

And this is a small empirical sample of the 'Heart of Darkness' in which the disgusting Taliban dwell.

Then in The Secret Agent, one is taken aback at how centuries old is the anarchist and terrorist freak; their ill and irrational nihilist mindset; their arrogance; the disdain for ordinary life and their clichéd, rotten speech and methods. And most importantly, their utterly mad and alienated pointlessness.

Conrad and his achievements are so explicitly resonant. What can I laughably add to his work and art? Don't answer that! So dig, hepcats, some of my favourite passages from these two perfect and profound novels. As they say, life is most resonant a night...



Excerpt from Joseph Conrad’s ‘Heart of Darkness’. Source: Bibliomania.

“... No, it is impossible; it is impossible to convey the life-sensation of any given epoch of one’s existence - that which makes its truth, its meaning its subtle and penetrating essence. It is impossible. We live, as we dream alone....” Heart of Darkness.

“I would not have gone so far as to fight for Kurtz, but I went for him near enough to lie. You know I hate, detest, and can’t bear a lie, not because I am straighter than the rest of us, but simply because it appalls me. There is a taint of death, a flavour of mortality in lies which is exactly what I hate and detest in the world - what I want to forget. It makes me miserable and sick, like biting something rotten would do. Temperament, I suppose.

Well, I went near enough to it by letting the young fool there believe anything he liked to imagine as to my influence in Europe. I became in an instant as much of a pretence as the rest of the bewitched pilgrims. This simply because I had a notion it somehow would be of help to that Kurtz whom at the time I did not see you understand. He was just a word for me.

I did not see the man in the name any more than you do. Do you see him? Do you see the story? Do you see anything? It seems to me I am trying to tell you a dream - making a vain attempt, because no relation of a dream can convey the dream-sensation, that commingling of absurdity, surprise, and bewilderment in a tremor of struggling revolt, that notion of being captured by the incredible which is of the very essence of dreams....””. Marlow. Heart of Darkness.

“She had given me a chance to come out a bit - to find out what I could do. No, I don’t like work. I had rather laze about and think of all the fine things that can be done. I don’t like work - no man does - but I like what is in the work - the chance to find yourself. Your own reality - for yourself, not for others - what no other man can ever know. They can only see the mere show, and never can tell what it really means”. Heart of Darkness.

“Ah! my boy, trust to this - I say, trust to this.’ I saw him extend his short flipper of an arm for a gesture that took in the forest, the creek, the mud, the river - seemed to beckon with a dishonouring flourish before the sunlit face of the land a treacherous appeal to the lurking death, to the hidden evil, to the profound darkness of its heart.

It was so startling that I leaped to my feet and looked back at the edge of the forest, as though I had expected an answer of some sort to that black display of confidence. You know the foolish notions that come to one sometimes. The high stillness confronted these two figures with its ominous patience, waiting for the passing away of a fantastic invasion”. Heart of Darkness.

“Trees, trees, millions of trees, massive, immense, running up high; and at their foot, hugging the bank against the stream, crept the little begrimed steamboat, like a sluggish beetle crawling on the floor of a lofty portico. It made you feel very small, very lost, and yet it was not altogether depressing, that feeling. After all, if you were small, the grimy beetle crawled on - which was just what you wanted it to do. Where the pilgrims imagined it crawled to I don’t know. To some place where they expected to get something. I bet!

For me it crawled towards Kurtz – exclusively; but when the steam-pipes started leaking we crawled very slow. The reaches opened before us and closed behind, as if the forest had stepped leisurely across the water to bar the way for our return. We penetrated deeper and deeper into the heart of darkness. It was very quiet there. At night sometimes the roll of drums behind the curtain of trees would run up the river and remain sustained faintly, as if hovering in the air high over our heads, till the first break of day. Whether it meant war, peace, or prayer we could not tell.”. Heart of Darkness.

”The steamer toiled along slowly on the edge of a black and incomprehensible frenzy. The prehistoric man was cursing us, praying to us, welcoming us - who could tell? We were cut off from the comprehension of our surroundings; we glided past like phantoms, wondering and secretly appalled, as sane men would be before an enthusiastic outbreak in a madhouse. We could not understand because we were too far and could not remember because we were travelling in the night of first ages, of those ages that are gone, leaving hardly a sign - and no memories". Heart of Dakness.

“The earth seemed unearthly. We are accustomed to look upon the shackled form of a conquered monster, but there - there you could look at a thing monstrous and free. It was unearthly, and the men were - No, they were not inhuman. Well, you know, that was the worst of it - this suspicion of their not being inhuman.

It would come slowly to one. They howled and leaped, and spun, and made horrid faces; but what thrilled you was just the thought of their humanity - like yours - the thought of your remote kinship with this wild and passionate uproar. Ugly. Yes, it was ugly enough; but if you were man enough you would admit to yourself that there was in you just the faintest trace of a response to the terrible frankness of that noise, a dim suspicion of there being a meaning in it which you - you so remote from the night of first ages - could comprehend. And why not?

The mind of man is capable of anything - because everything is in it, all the past as well as all the future. What was there after all? Joy, fear, sorrow, devotion, valour, rage - who can tell? - but truth - truth stripped of its cloak of time. Let the fool gape and shudder - the man knows, and can look on without a wink. But he must at least be as much of a man as these on the shore. He must meet that truth with his own true stuff - with his own inborn strength. Principles won’t do. Acquisitions, clothes, pretty rags - rags that would fly off at the first good shake. No; you want a deliberate belief.

An appeal to me in this fiendish row - is there? Very well; I hear; I admit, but I have a voice, too, and for good or evil mine is the speech that cannot be silenced. Of course, a fool, what with sheer fright and fine sentiments, is always safe. Who’s that grunting? You wonder I didn’t go ashore for a howl and a dance? Well, no - I didn’t. Fine sentiments, you say? Fine sentiments, be hanged!” Heart of Darkness.

“A complaining clamour, modulated in savage discords, filled our ears. The sheer unexpectedness of it made my hair stir under my cap. I don’t know how it struck the others: to me it seemed as though the mist itself had screamed, so suddenly, and apparently from all sides at once, did this tumultuous and mournful uproar arise.

It culminated in a hurried outbreak of almost intolerably excessive shrieking, which stopped short, leaving us stiffened in a variety of silly attitudes, and obstinately listening to the nearly as appalling and excessive silence. ‘Good God! What is the meaning -’ stammered at my elbow one of the pilgrims - a little fat man, with sandy hair and red whiskers, who wore sidespring boots, and pink pyjamas tucked into his socks.

Two others remained open-mouthed a whole minute, then dashed into the little cabin, to rush out incontinently and stand darting scared glances, with Winchesters at ‘ready’ in their hands. What we could see was just the steamer we were on, her outlines blurred as though she had been on the point of dissolving, and a misty strip of water, perhaps two feet broad, around her - and that was all. The rest of the world was nowhere, as far as our eyes and ears were concerned. Just nowhere. Gone, disappeared; swept off without leaving a whisper or a shadow behind”. Heart of Darkness.

“That was not the point. The point was in his being a gifted creature, and that of all his gifts the one that stood out preeminently, that carried with it a sense of real presence, was his ability to talk,his words - the gift of expression, the bewildering, the illuminating, the most exalted and the most contemptible, the pulsating stream of light, or the deceitful flow from the heart of an impenetrable darkness”. Heart of Darkness.

“... Who was not his friend who had heard him speak once?’ she was saying. ‘He drew men towards him by what was best in them.’ She looked at me with intensity. ‘It is the gift of the great,’ she went on, and the sound of her low voice seemed to have the accompaniment of all the other sounds, full of mystery, desolation, and sorrow, I had ever heard - the ripple of the river, the soughing of the trees swayed by the wind, the murmurs of the crowds, the faint ring of incomprehensible words cried from afar, the whisper of a voice speaking from beyond the threshold of an eternal darkness. ‘But you have heard him! You know!’ she cried.

“Yes, I know,’ I said with something like despair in my heart, but bowing my head before the faith that was in her, before that great and saving illusion that shone with an unearthly glow in the darkness, in the triumphant darkness from which I could not have defended her - from which I could not even defend myself”. Heart of Darkness.

“Forgive me. I - I have mourned so long in silence - in silence.... You were with him - to the last? I think of his loneliness. Nobody near to understand him as I would have understood. Perhaps no one to hear....’

“To the very end,’ I said, shakily. ‘I heard his very last words....’ I stopped in a fright.

“Repeat them,’ she murmured in a heart-broken tone. ‘I want - I want - something - something - to - to live with".

“I was on the point of crying at her, ‘Don’t you hear them?’ The dusk was repeating them in a persistent whisper all around us, in a whisper that seemed to swell menacingly like the first whisper of a rising wind. ‘The horror! The horror!” The heart of Darkness.

“I heard a light sigh and then my heart stood still, stopped dead short by an exulting and terrible cry, by the cry of inconceivable triumph and of unspeakable pain. ‘I knew it - I was sure!’... She knew. She was sure. I heard her weeping; she had hidden her face in her hands.

It seemed to me that the house would collapse before I could escape, that the heavens would fall upon my head. But nothing happened. The heavens do not fall for such a trifle. Would they have fallen, I wonder, if I had rendered Kurtz that justice which was his due? Hadn’t he said he wanted only justice? But I couldn’t. I could not tell her. It would have been too dark - too dark altogether....”

Marlow ceased, and sat apart, indistinct and silent, in the pose of a meditating Buddha. Nobody moved for a time. “We have lost the first of the ebb,” said the Director suddenly. I raised my head. The offing was barred by a black bank of clouds, and the tranquil waterway leading to the uttermost ends of the earth flowed sombre under an overcast sky - seemed to lead into the heart of an immense darkness”. Heart of Darkness.



Excerpt from Joseph Conrad’s The Secret Agent. [In paperback, pages 29 to 35.] Source:

“What we want is to administer a tonic to the Conference in Milan,' he said, airily. `Its deliberations upon international action for the suppression of political crime don't seem to get anywhere. England lags.

This country is absurd with its sentimental regard for individual liberty. It's intolerable to think that all your friends have got only to come over to...'

`In that way I have them all under my eye,' Mr Verloc interrupted, huskily.

`It would be much more to the point to have them all under lock and key. England must be brought into line. The imbecile bourgeoisie of this country make themselves the accomplices of the very people whose aim is to drive them out of their houses to starve in ditches. And they have the political power still, if they only had the sense to use it for their preservation. I suppose you agree that the middle classes are stupid?'

Mr Verloc agreed hoarsely.`They are.'

`They have no imagination. They are blinded by an idiotic vanity. What they want just now is a jolly good scare. This is the psychological moment to set your friends to work. I have had you called here to develop to you my idea.'

And Mr Vladimir developed his idea from on high, with scorn and condescension, displaying at the same time an amount of ignorance as to the real aims, thoughts, and methods of the revolutionary world which filled the silent Mr Verloc with inward consternation.

He confounded causes with effects more than was excusable; the most distinguished propagandists with impulsive bomb throwers; assumed organization where in the nature of things it could not exist; spoke of the social revolutionary party one moment as of a perfectly disciplined army, where the word of chiefs was supreme, and at another as if it had been the loosest association of desperate brigands that ever camped in a mountain gorge.

Once Mr Verloc had opened his mouth for a protest, but the raising of a shapely, large white hand arrested him. Very soon he became too appalled to even try to protest. He listened in a stillness of dread which resembled the immobility of profound attention.

`A series of outrages,' Mr Vladimir continued, calmly, `executed here in this country; not only planned here - that would not do - they would not mind. Your friends could set half the Continent on fire without influencing the public opinion here in favour of a universal repressive legislation. They will not look outside their backyard here.'

Mr Verloc cleared his throat, but his heart failed him, and he said nothing.
`These outrages need not be especially sanguinary,' Mr Vladimir went on, as if delivering a scientific lecture, `but they must sufficiently startling - effective. Let them be directed against buildings, for instance. What is the fetish of the hour that all the bourgeoisie recognize - eh, Mr Verloc?'

Mr Verloc opened his hands and shrugged his shoulders slightly.

`You are too lazy to think,' was Mr Vladimir's comment upon that gesture. `Pay attention to what I say. The fetish of today is neither royalty nor religion. Therefore the palace and the church should be left alone. You understand what I mean, Mr Verloc?'

The dismay and the scorn of Mr Verloc found vent in an attempt at levity.
`Perfectly. But what of the Embassies? A series of attacks on the various Embassies,' he began; but he could not withstand the cold, watchful stare of the First Secretary.

`You can be facetious, I see,' the latter observed, carelessly. `That's all right. It may enliven your oratory at socialistic congresses. But this room is no place for it. It would be infinitely safer for you to follow carefully what I am saying. As you are being called upon to furnish facts instead of cock-and-bull stories, you had better try to make your profit off what I am taking the trouble to explain to you.

The sacrosanct fetish of today is science. Why don't you get some of your friends to go for that wooden-faced panjandrum - eh? Is it not part of these institutions which must be swept away before the F.P. comes along?'

Mr Verloc said nothing. He was afraid to open his lips lest a groan should escape him.

`This is what you should try for. An attempt upon a crowned head or on a president is sensational enough in a way, but not so much as it used to be. It has entered into the general conception of the existence of all chiefs of state. It's almost conventional - especially since so many presidents have been assassinated. Now let us take an outrage upon - say, a church.

Horrible enough at first sight, no doubt, and yet not so effective as a person of an ordinary mind might think. No matter how revolutionary and anarchist in inception, there would be fools enough to give such an outrage the character of a religious manifestation. And that would detract from the especial alarming significance we wish to give to the act.

A murderous attempt on a restaurant or a theatre would suffer in the same way from the suggestion of non-political passion; the exasperation of a hungry man, an act of social revenge. All this is used up; it is no longer instructive as an object lesson in revolutionary anarchism. Every newspaper has ready-made phrases to explain such manifestations away.

I am about to give you the philosophy of bomb throwing from my point of view; from the point of view you pretend to have been serving for the last eleven years. I will try not to talk above your head. The sensibilities of the class you are attacking are soon blunted. Property seems to them an indestructible thing. You can't count upon their emotions either of pity or fear for very long. A bomb outrage to have any influence on public opinion now must go beyond the intention of vengeance or terrorism. It must be purely destructive. It must be that, and only that, beyond the faintest suspicion of any other object.

You anarchists should make it clear that you are perfectly determined to make a clean sweep of the whole social creation. But how to get that appallingly absurd notion into the heads of the middle classes so that there should be no mistake? That's the question. By directing your blows at something outside the ordinary passions of humanity is the answer. Of course, there is art. A bomb in the National Gallery would make some noise. But it would not be serious enough. Art has never been their fetish.

It's like breaking a few back windows in a man's house; whereas, if you want to make him really sit up, you must try at least to raise the roof. There would be some screaming of course, but from whom? Artists - art critics and such like - people of no account. Nobody minds what they say.

But there is learning - science. Any imbecile that has got an income believes in that. He does not know why, but he believes it matters somehow. It is the sacrosanct fetish. All the damned professors are radicals at heart. Let them know that their great panjandrum has got to go, too, to make room for the Future of the Proletariat.

A howl from all these intellectual idiots is bound to help forward the labours of the Milan Conference. They will be writing to the papers. Their indignation would be above suspicion, no material interests being openly at stake, and it will alarm every selfishness of the class which should be impressed. They believe that in some mysterious way science is at the source of their material prosperity. They do. And the absurd ferocity of such a demonstration will affect them more profoundly than the mangling of a whole street - or theatre - full of their own kind.

To that last they can always say: "Oh! it's mere class hate." But what is one to say to an act of destructive ferocity so absurd as to be incomprehensible, inexplicable, almost unthinkable; in fact, mad? Madness alone is truly terrifying, inasmuch as you cannot placate it either by threats, persuasion, or bribes.

Moreover, I am a civilized man. I would never dream of directing you to organize a mere butchery, even if I expected the best results from it. But I wouldn't expect from a butchery the result I want. Murder is always with us. It is almost an institution.

The demonstration must be against learning - science. But not every science will do. The attack must have all the shocking senselessness of gratuitous blasphemy. Since bombs are your means of expression, it would be really telling if one could throw a bomb into pure mathematics. But that is impossible.

I have been trying to educate you; I have expounded to you the higher philosophy of your usefulness, and suggested to you some serviceable arguments. The practical application of my teaching interests you mostly. But from the moment I have undertaken to interview you I have also given some attention to the practical aspect of the question. What do you think of having a go at astronomy?'

For some time already Mr Verloc's immobility by the side of the armchair resembled a state of collapsed coma - a sort of passive insensibility interrupted by slight convulsive starts, such as may be observed in the domestic dog having a nightmare on the hearthrug. And it was in an uneasy, doglike growl that he repeated the word: Astronomy.'

He had not recovered thoroughly as yet from the state of bewilderment brought about by the effort to follow Mr Vladimir's rapid, incisive utterance. It had overcome his power of assimilation. It had made him angry. This anger was complicated by incredulity. And suddenly it dawned upon him that all this was an elaborate joke.

Mr Vladimir exhibited his white teeth in a smile, with dimples on his round, full face posed with a complacent inclination above the bristling bow of his necktie. The favourite of intelligent society women had assumed his drawing-room attitude accompanying the delivery of delicate witticisms. Sitting well forward, his white hand upraised, he seemed to hold delicately between his thumb and forefinger the subtlety of his suggestion.

There could be nothing better. Such an outrage combines the greatest possible regard for humanity with the most alarming display of ferocious imbecility. I defy the ingenuity of journalists to persuade their public that any given member of the proletariat can have a personal grievance against astronomy.

Starvation itself could hardly be dragged in there - eh? And there are other advantages. The whole civilized world has heard of Greenwich. The very bootblacks in the basement of Charing Cross Station know something of it. See?'

The features of Mr Vladimir, so well known in the best society by their humorous urbanity, beamed with cynical self-satisfaction, which would have astonished the intelligent women his wit entertained so exquisitely. `Yes,' he continued, with a contemptuous smile, `the blowing up of the first meridian is bound to raise a howl of execration.'

`A difficult business,' Mr Verloc mumbled, feeling that this was the only safe thing to say.

`What is the matter? Haven't you the whole gang under your hand? The very pick of the basket? That old terrorist Yundt is here. I see him walking about Piccadilly in his green havelock almost every day. And Michaelis, the ticket-of-leave apostle - you don't mean to say you don't know where he is? Because if you don't, I can tell you,' Mr Vladimir went on menacingly. `If you imagine that you are the only one in the secret fund list, you are mistaken.'

This perfectly gratuitous suggestion caused Mr Verloc to shuffle his feet slightly. And the whole Lausanne lot - eh? Haven't they been flocking over here at the first hint of the Milan Conference? This is an absurd country”.

E=Mc2 and a suitcase nuke.

“It’s the end...it’s Doomsday...damn you to Hell you bloody baboon!” Chuck finds everything truly human betrayed and that he's standing outnumbered, dragged low, mouthing into the storm and facing the swarming barbarians...alone.




“This is the end,
Beautiful friend.
This is the end,
My only friend, the end.

Of our elaborate plans, the end.
Of everything that stands, the end.
No safety or surprise, the end.
I'll never look into your eyes...again.

Can you picture what will be?
So limitless and free,
Desperately in need, of some stranger's hand,
In a, desperate land”. The End, Jim Morrison and the Doors.


We can’t go on like this. No, really. It’s a law of physics that “every object in a state of uniform motion tends to remain in that state of motion unless an external force is applied to it”. Newton’s First Law of Motion.

We are unbelievably on a gradual slide to no return, because quite simply, the spontaneous deflection and the required effective counter punches are restricted, lacking or non existent.

And the objects in a state of motion are the abyss and crush of Islam; the eternal living dead of the Left; of Marxist and Communist ideology based on murder and lies; a useless, spineless neurotic dhimmitude of denial; a bankrupt and untrustworthy MSM; the global socialism of global warming fraud and man, the general pitiful cluelessness of it all.

What’s acting against such er, objects, Jim? Not enough at all, to zero.

More are acting for it and the added momentum they eagerly and stupidly provide in literal treason comes rather incredibly and suicidally, from the intended target. That’s the free and human scale West, kids.

“The West is the best.
The West is the best.
Get here, and we'll do the rest". The End, Jim Morrison. The Doors.

Every moment, a vast drift of nihilistic evil is moving in the dark of wilful ignorance. Can you feel, hear and see it? I bloody can. Everything I can imagine and more is happening right now and much of it dreadful. This no matter how comfortable my bed, and how good a plate of pasta can be.

"I like not fair terms and a villain's mind”. William Shakespeare. The Merchant of Venice" Via Shooting Star.

“We were talking about the space between us all of illusion, never glimpse the truth, until it’s far too late, and we pass away”. Within You Without You. The Beatles.

We said how ain’t it funny how proportionately few read and read well...Yeah, it's a riot. Jesus, many people think this is the way it is, instead of a small period of light in “the dark tunnel of history”. They don't notice that everything we have is fragile, and created by often greater men and women of the past than us.

How long do you think it’s possible to draw upon the soul, blood and minds of those who saw the value of our liberty and the reality of awful and monstrous tyranny and think they were inferior and mistaken boobs? Not much 'effing longer, mate.

I mean, every second bastard it can seem, [apart from you and I of course!], seems to have a two dimensional idea of how our world is built, and why and how it functions often better than you could expect. We live in a miracle of individuality, creativity and co-operation, folks.

“Lost in a Roman wilderness of pain.
And all the children are insane.
All the children are insane.
Waiting for the summer rain, yeah”. The End, Jim Morrison. The Doors.

Islam and its enablers are a murderous force that has and is moving upon and against us. It will devour our civilisation and the million things that make it beautiful and flawed, and then as sure as the grave, it will collapse and implode in on its myriad factions. The world will resemble a perverted dead and forbidden zone, all without anyone left to buy their oil.

Islam teaches infiltration and forward movement when there is an opportunity, and never has there been a greater range of advantages to be taken and er, consolidated. Add ‘em up. Demographics, anti-Democratic laws and worst of all, incompetent, disingenuous cowardly authorities and a largely fake media, who refuse to inform the people of harsh facts or simply deny and lie about them.

“The relationship between an object's mass m, its acceleration a, and the applied force F is F = ma. Acceleration and force are vectors (as indicated by their symbols being displayed in slant bold font); in this law the direction of the force vector is the same as the direction of the acceleration vector”. Newton’s Second Law of motion.

Imagine any theatre of operations in WWll, where you think it’s a groovy idea to not even name your mortal enemy, while destroying your own ability from inside? Not only allowing it but encouraging this, legislating for it and making cultural and security suicide...compulsory? Don’t imagine, look around.

“The blue bus is callin' us.
The blue bus is callin' us.
Driver, where you taken' us?

There's danger on the edge of town.
Ride the King's highway, baby.
Weird scenes inside the gold mine.
Ride the highway west, baby.

Ride the snake, ride the snake.
To the lake, the ancient lake, baby.
The snake is long, seven miles.
Ride the snake...he's old, and his skin is cold”. The End, Jim Morrison. The Doors.

There’s the insane contradiction for you. They tell you to be tolerant of something you know nothing about. Why and how exactly? A dumb tolerance based on er, faith? Which one, you jerks?

As Mark Steyn said of multiculturalism, it absolves you from learning anything about another culture. Just feel good about it and go the restaurants. So hey, I decide to study Islam and what do I find? Nothing but a nest of unbearable vipers and a nausea that tracks and surrounds like some filthy smog. God knows what its like for the poor souls born and trapped within it. Ah yes, but we do, those of us who care to know. Like this ten year old bride piece for a tip of the dysfunctional iceberg.

So let me get this crap straight. If one respects Mohammad/Islam/the Koran enough to seriously research them, you ain’t gonna respect ‘em at all, unless one is deeply deficient. Gotcha. Check.

“I wanna destroy!” Pretty Vacant. Johnny Rotten. The Sex Pistols.

Yes, Mohammad, the Prophet of doom.

“The killer awoke before dawn, he put his boots on.
He took a face from the ancient gallery.
And he walked on down the hall.

He went into the room where his sister lived, and then he,
Paid a visit to his brother, and then he,
He walked on down the hall, and,
And he came to a door...and he looked inside.

Father, yes son, I want to kill you.
Mother...I want to...fuck you”. The End, Jim Morrison. The Doors.

Hey, an average night in Riyadh. We better start seeing what we have, it’s profound human meaning and what it will be like when it’s all gone, never to return, which is entirely possible. Everyday we should get down on our hands and knees and thank God for Capitalist Democracy. No, really. Every twerp that sneers at that can only exist within it.

“C'mon baby, take a chance with us.
C'mon baby, take a chance with us.
C'mon baby, take a chance with us.
And meet me at the back of the blue bus.

Doin' a blue rock,
On a blue bus.
Doin' a blue rock,
C'mon, yeah.
Kill, kill, kill, kill, kill, kill”. The End, Jim Morrison. The Doors.

”For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”. Newtons Third Law of Motion.’

In martial arts, there is no opponent per se, but a series of forces and actions in the real world that must be understood and dealt with effectively, with stripped down technique via a true individual and complete human being. There is only one goal in a fight for life or death. Deflect, counter hit and total annihilating victory.

Sure, there’s always an alternative, if you all don’t mind madness, the endless sorrow of dhimmitude and dying. Frankly my dear, I do give a damn.

“This is the end,
Beautiful friend.
This is the end,
My only friend, the end.

It hurts to set you free,
But you'll never follow me.
The end of laughter and soft lies,
The end of nights we tried to die.

This is the end”. The End, Jim Morrison. The Doors.

I said hang them from the yard arm, Mr Jackson!

A Moorish Ambassador a la Barbary pirate. Hey, the look is kinda familiar...yet I can't seem to put my finger on it...oh, that's right! Every Islamist loon and many an alleged moderate right now.

Terrorists: the pirates of today and an unbroken Islamic vampirical business tradition. Imagine if we still dressed in powdered wigs, stockings and buckle shoes? "Oh, weirdsville!" But millions dress like Ali Baba in drag, and this sets off no alarm bells? Sheesh. God and guns help us all.




Ahoy and avast ye Leftard liberal anti-Zionist Jew hating lubbers, scurvy Islamist Hamas dogs and pieces of PC hate! I sends ye all to Davey Jones locker!

“For centuries the Barbary nations of North Africa— which included the Muslim kingdoms of Algiers, Tunis, Morocco, and Tripoli—had been enriching their treasuries by committing acts of piracy against non-Muslim nations.

The pirates took the cargoes and held the crews for ransom or sold them into slavery. The only nations that were exempt from piracy were those that regularly made huge payments to the Barbary nations to leave their ships alone”. From the National Geographic.

“...But one cannot get around what Jefferson heard when he went with John Adams to wait upon Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785.

When they inquired by what right the Barbary states preyed upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers, America’s two foremost envoys were informed that “it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find..

..and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.” Christopher Hitchens on Andrew Jackson and the Barbary [Muslim] Pirates.

Here's a little satire I found of Leiberman.

Ah, Muslims have an endless history of piracy and slavery that they practice eagerly and as an intrinsic part of their er, culture. It's how Islam was founded, kids. Through banditry and by a bandit, AKA Mohammad.

So dear sports, I went to this great site, A Jacksonian Blogspot, and after a long absence, and it occurred to me. The kind of Islamist freaks and their Leftard Western enablers that Australia's Michael Burd or Mark Steyn, Bob Spencer, Bruce Bawer, Walid Shoebat and Wafa Sultan etc, have been empirically exposing, are defined clearly as pirates by the US and International Piracy Laws. God, it’s beautiful. Really.

That would mean eager asshat wearers like Antony Lowenstein, lying bogan trained child killer David Hicks, every chum of every pro-Islamist shit club and Hell, any of the thousands of MSM spastics and Islamist loons infesting our naïve land and thus proxy seas.

And for Davo the venal Hick, include the beyond belief ex-leader of the now defunct, long term bankrupt and laughably named Democrats, Natasha Stott Despoja. To celebrate the end of said party of Leftard neo Socialist and faux independent twerps, she takes the trained child killer Hicks, and I kid you not, to the break up party as a guest!

Derek: "She did that?"

Clive: "Yes, Derek. Maybe cleaned out Daves bazooka in the bog".

Derek: "What a stupid and deluded 'effing bint!"

Clive: "Exactly, Derek. Thick as a brick appears to be the operative word".

Thus Sean Penn and Kevin Spacey hang out and cheer on Chavez, who hangs out with Iran’s Armachimphead, and Chavez allows Hezbollah to train Indians among others in his country.

Landlocked doesn't void the definition. Think pirate, think bandit, think terrorist and child killer rapist etc. Chavez is a pirate, as Iran is a pirate state, continuing on the 1300 year old unbroken founding history of Islamic banditry and piracy. Thus Penn and Spacey, et al, are pirates and could be charged as such. Why ain’t they? But then, why did Jane Fonda never serve jail time?

Hey, here’s a groovy Annoy Jane story. Seems Jane and Turner went to a restaurant and demanded to be seated ahead of the queue. No dice. “Do you know who I am?” says the narcissistic, bloated ego and profoundly neurotic Treason Queen. Where’s da Manager? So, the manager comes and he’s a Vietnam vet! Classic. “Yes, I know exactly who you are” says the vet, and get the Hell out of my restaurant!

Wonderful eh? She was great in Klute and a lot of other stuff though, eh? Sadly, character acting is by definition, an act, and not always actual character.

I digress. Back to Lowy the poo poo face, who apparently loves to hang out on the West bank just having tea and a chat with various Islamist fruit loops. Never mind that the PLF, Hamas and the rest of the nihilist child killer parade, literally ARE pirates and should be treated as such.

And anyone who associates or supports their efforts in ANY way is also a pirate. Mate! But er gee whiz, Ma. Never say you don't like Islam. Put away that Islam Sucks t-shirt now.

I know why they don’t. Forty years of deluded Leftist propaganda has undermined our own sense of reality and survival. Deal with Hamas, the PLF or any of these abyss dwellers? Sure, when your mortal enemy is utterly crushed, demoralised, depleted of funds, resources, people and or they’re all dead. Sure, then we can talk. Gab away, creeps.

Now dear reader, do read this great Jacksonian piece and do visit the great 'A Jacksonian blogspot'. Ask for Old Hickory!


Extract from the incredibly good A Jacksonian Blogspot. 16 June 2007.

“Why do we refuse to call terrorism for what it is?

“Fourth is a key to ending help with Pirates and I restate it, again:

"Whoever consults, combines, confederates, or corresponds with any pirate or robber upon the seas, knowing him to be guilty of any piracy or robbery, or..."

Anyone who gives any help, advice, consultation, correspondence or actively confederates with Pirates can be charged under this statute when such aid is given to those known to be Pirates or even simple thieves and robbers upon the seas. This includes their organizations on land that have waged war upon the commerce of the US or its citizens. Those *are* Pirates.

The last is anyone who confines the master of a vessel, any vessel, is also covered under this statute.

One can be fined or put into jail for up to 3 years for doing these things.

As terrorists rarely plunder vessels these days, I will skip over the next two statutes which deal with attacks to plunder and plundering of those in distress. Likewise is receipt of stolen goods via Piracy skipped over.

There is a final one of interest and the last of the laws on Piracy:

Sec. 1661. Robbery ashore.

Whoever, being engaged in any piratical cruise or enterprise, or being of the crew of any piratical vessel, lands from such vessel and commits robbery on shore, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

Yes, if a member of an organization that has been deemed to be Piratical actually DOES try to rob you, they are liable to be imprisoned for life. They need only be engaged in a piratical enterprise to be liable for this.

Now here is the question: Just how many terrorist organizations have used war-like capacity to attack US citizens engaged in commerce overseas, including tourists and businessmen, or otherwise attacked any US facility or property, owned in whole or in part by US companies?

Because those activities against the commerce of the US, as defined by the US Code, are Pirates. Even if they don't have a single sloop to their name.

The harder question is to name one terrorist organization that has NOT attacked the US or its citizen’s intent on sending a message while utilizing war-like capability to do so.


We certainly can imprison all such individuals who take part in such organizations for LIFE...Consider this news report from 15 JUL 2006 by ABC News, confirmed by multiple sources:

Jerusalem Jul 15, 2006 (AP): A missile fired by Hezbollah, not an unmanned drone laden with explosives, damaged an Israeli warship off Lebanon, the army said Saturday.

The attack late Friday alarmed Israel because initial information indicated the guerrillas had used a drone for the first time to attack Israeli forces.

But the army's investigation showed that Hezbollah had fired an Iranian-made missile at the vessel from the shores of Lebanon, said Brig. Gen. Ido Nehushtan.

"We can confirm that it was hit by an Iranian-made missile launched by Hezbollah. We see this as very profound fingerprint of Iranian involvement in Hezbollah," Nehushtan said in an interview with The Associated Press.

Another Hezbollah missile also hit and sank a nearby merchant ship at around the same time, Nehushtan said. He said that ship apparently was Egyptian, but had no other information".

Do notice the last section there.

That, the unwarranted attack upon an unarmed merchant on the High Seas, is Piracy.

It does not matter if that was or was not a US vessel that was an indiscriminate attack upon civilian merchant shipping. Therefore, all members of Hezbollah are Pirates and can be put away for life imprisonment under the Admiralty adjudication of the Laws.

Amazing, isn't it? One simple Law and all of one entire Terrorist Organization can now be gone after by the US. And if they resist arrest... well, not the thing to do if you are a Pirate now, is it?

How about the next law in line:

Sec. 1653. Aliens as pirates.

Whoever, being a citizen or subject of any foreign state, is found and taken on the sea making war upon the United States, or cruising against the vessels and property thereof, or of the citizens of the same, contrary to the provisions of any treaty existing between the United States and the state of which the offender is a citizen or subject, when by such treaty such acts are declared to be piracy, is a pirate, and shall be imprisoned for life.

Yet another way to look at Piracy, this time from the perspective of going after the US, vessels, property or citizens of the Nation. Again, an Admiralty Law, not a Civil Law.

Now let’s think upon the 1985 hijacking of the Achille Lauro cruise ship. That was an act of Piracy against a ship with the attacking and killing an American aboard, who was using civilian maritime transport which he had paid for passage on: Leon Klinghoffer.

Who was behind it? The Palestine Liberation Front and was led by Abbu Abbas ( Muhammad Zaidan ). This organization would later be funded and backed by Saddam Hussein. Over at the Terror Knowledge Base we get this from their entry on the PLF:

Current Goals: The PLF continued to carry out attacks against Israelis through the 80’s and 90’s, often employing unique techniques such as hand gliders, and even claimed a naval unit. Abbas and the PLF did, however, support the signing of the 1993 Oslo accords, and officially renounced terrorism against Israel. Abbas was permitted to move back to Gaza in 1996 under an Oslo-related Amnesty program. PLF involvement in terrorism was still suspected after 1993 due to the group’s distribution of Iraqi funds to Palestinian suicide bombers.

By claiming a 'naval unit' and having previously performed Piracy, this organization continues its ways under that purview. Thus the whole of the PLF can considered to be a Piracy operation and can be brought in with life imprisonment for any involved with it.

Consider next the al Qaeda attack upon the USS Cole. As Al Qaeda sponsored this operation and takes full credit for it and it is an attack upon a US Navy vessel and it being an act of war to attack same, all of Al Qaeda is a piratical operation. They can be brought in and sentenced for life imprisonment under the Admiralty Laws.

Dear me! In three actions we now have three organizations that claim to be merely terrorist organizations, but are, in fact, piratical operations:

1) Hezbollah.
2) Palestine Liberation Front.
3) Al Qaeda.

This is becoming a 'who's who' of Transnational Terrorism! Let’s see what other lovely organizations there are out there that have performed acts of Piracy!"

Source: A Jacksonian Blogspot.

The trouble with Hurry Up Harry.

At Harry's place, things can seem kind of almost ok for while. That's until there's a sharp Left turn and the crazy pills kick in. Oh, and they will. They will...





"What a dump!". Bette Davis. Beyond the Forest [1949].

“Your manuscript is both good and original, but the part that is good is not original and the part that is original is not good”. Samuel Johnson. [Attributed.]

“Half of what I say is meaningless,
But I say it just to reach you, Julia”. Julia. The Beatles.

Now here’s the thing. There is a blog, Hurry Up Harry, that is less than half good, less than half funny and less than half decent. It’s a [less than] half a blog! It’s a Left blog, baby. It’s almost, almost neat and then it’s as if someone has cut out whole paragraphs, then inserted classic endless Logical Fallacy of the moral equivalence, absurd and contradictory Koskid boob kind. No, really.

"Is this love baby, or confusion?" Love or Confusion. Jimi Hendrix.

Harry seems to be doing some good work, and then invariably blows it. And Harry is damn popular. Hey, obviously a lack of Quality Control is a great selling point in today’s neo-teen market! Credit to Harry for unmoderated comments. A very rare thing on Left sites.

“A one... two-- A one... two... three... four...
Half a bee, philosophically,
Must, ipso facto, half not be.
But half the bee has got to be,
Vis a vis, its entity. D'you see?

But can a bee be said to be,
Or not to be an entire bee,
When half the bee is not a bee,
Due to some ancient injury?” Eric the half a bee. Monty Python.

Now Harry is in Britain, and is being sued, as one often is today, by a classic Islamist loon and creep. Now mostly, the conservative parts of the Net have quickly supported Harry. No surprise at all for the aware.

Harry: “...when I say I’m grateful for the most of the support we’ve received from the blogosphere after we reported the threatened lawsuit against us by Mohammed Sawalha, the Hamas supporter who is president of the British Muslim Initiative”.

Thanks for er, most of the support?

Er, riiight Harry, oh glaringly uncool and ungracious twerp. Why the er, “most” caveat, Harry? [See the comment/letter I left at Harry's joint further down.] Well, as is the standard form today, most support for free speech and in this case, Harry’s, has as stated previously, come overwhelmingly from the conservative blogosphere. Harry is rather prone to wrong definition, and absurd attribution. And yet, he still deserves our support including mine regards his right to free speech. Go figure true conservatives. We do mean the freedom thing, even for you.

“I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”. The Friends of Voltaire, 1906. Attributed to Voltaire.

Here's a good piece of work by Harry, on the background of the laughable charges made against his site, by the Islamist Hamas scumbag Mohammad Sawalha, President of the British Muslim Initiative. Whatever. I think Mohammad also makes the sandwiches during beheading video nights.

Harry: “Much of the backing comes as a result of an item posted by Glenn Reynolds at the very popular right-of-center blog Instapundit, who linked to a “Support Harry’s Place Blogburst” set up by the conservative blog NeoConstant. Although I haven’t done a thorough review of all the blogs that have signed up, at a glance they appear to be overwhelmingly on the political right”.

Actually Harry, Instapundit is not right of centre, and we are not so much of the mythical right per se, as mostly conservatives, libertarian, contrarian, iconoclastic, mature, secular or often Christian etc, and hip humorous empiricists like me. No, really.

“I’m more of a Heinleinian libertarian...” The great Glenn Reynolds.

Nick from South Africa on Harry: “Reynolds is a fiscal conservative and a social liberal, with libertarian leanings. I think describing his blog as ‘right-of-centre’ is a little clumsy and rather old fashioned”.

Harry: “In most cases, I have no problem with this...”

I bet ya do, mate.

Harry: “...for the most part I welcome the support of anyone who opposes the BMI’s dishonest efforts to suggest that we deliberately misconstrued the meaning of what Al-Jazeera originally reported Sawalha as saying about the Jews in London celebrating Israel’s 60th anniversary. (I hope they would all be equally supportive if, for some reason, we were being unfairly sued by Mark Steyn or Rush Limbaugh, but I live in the real world.)”

What real world is that? The Rings of Venus? Tragic innit? Harry just slings out super hyperbole and self-parody via an impossible hypothetical attribution. Mark Steyn would sue anyone? Bullshit , mate. How, why and bloody when? Evidence? Zero. Intellectual rigour? Ditto?

Harry: “...However there appear to be some anti-Muslim hate sites on this list– this one, for example...”

Er, it’s NOT a hate site. Oh that’s right. Defamation of Islam is newspeak for blasphemy. Sheesh. What crap.

Harry: “...whose support we can easily manage without. In fact I would be quite pleased if those blogs would remove themselves from our list of supporters. We have no more use for their support than we would for support from racist or anti-semitic sites”.

Then I guess that rules out a shit load of Left sites as the Left are almost invariably anti-Israel and anti-Semitic then? They are after all, the new bedfellows of Islamists everywhere.

Harry: “...Although the support from leftwing blogs has been a good deal less intense, I welcome it too...”

Yeah, less intense. Bugger all and late compared to the conservative sites, though, eh?

Harry: “...especially from our comrades at Shiraz Socialist who, despite their frequent disagreements with us, responded by telling the BMI to “Sue us too, you anti-Semitic scum!”

A boy named Sue?

Harry: "What’s interesting, however, is (aside from the usual nonsense by Seumas Milne) the absence of support on the web for the BMI’s position– at least as far as I’ve seen. Part of the reason for this, I suppose, is that the BMI hasn’t even mentioned it on their own website, which still prominently promotes last month’s demonstration against George Bush’s London visit..."

Hey, big effing surprise. Islamist freaks hate George Bush just like the Left? Who woulda thought it?

Harry: “...Another reason, perhaps, is that even the most dogged HP bashers are clear-eyed enough to see this threatened lawsuit for what it is, even if they’ll never admit it”.

Harry, conservatives always have, and do see this for what it is now. It's an attack on the individual and free expression by a totalitarian ideology called Islam. This is why they are supporting a Leftard like you. This is something the Left virtually never does. Narrow paradigms and rigid conformity to a total wooden package, is how Leftards celebrate diversity!

Harry: “Update: In the course of offering Harry’s Place his unwanted and unneeded support, Robert at Dhimmi Watch calls us “clueless dhimmis.” Is that a bad thing?”

Now here's a kicker. Insulting the great and empirically impeccable Robert Spencer, THE worlds foremost expert and specialist on Islam and associated ills. What is Harry’s beef exactly, beyond jealousy and Bob’s crushing superiority to anything Harry could ever muster?

Robert Spencer: “Over at Harry's Place, however, they still think that "jihad is what you make of it," as if words have no meaning and Islamic theology has no content, as if you could easily read The Brothers Karamazov as a cookbook or Mein Kampf as an adventure novel, or of course the Qur'an and Sunnah and rulings of all the madhahib as not counseling warfare against and the subjugation of unbelievers...

...With customary graciousness, Harry's Place says our support is "unwanted and unneeded", without, of course, specifying anything we say or have ever said about Islamic jihad as inaccurate, and tarring us with the familiar "Islamophobia" brush that jihad propagandists and their witless dupes (like Harry) wield against anyone who speaks accurately about the elements of Islam that jihadists use to incite violence. Harry asks if being a clueless dhimmi is a "bad thing."

Yes, Harry, it is, and the fact that you don't know why is only the beginning of your troubles". Bob Spencer.

“Singing...

La dee dee, one two three,
Eric the half a bee.
A B C D E F G,
Eric the half a bee.

Is this wretched demi-bee,
Half-asleep upon my knee,
Some freak from a menagerie?
No! It's Eric the half a bee!

Fiddle de dum, Fiddle de dee,
Eric the half a bee.
Ho ho ho, tee hee hee,
Eric the half a bee". Eric the half a bee. Monty Python.

Anyway, the great Phyllis Chessler has a link, and the very good Neoconstant felt it startlingly neccessary to apologise to Harry. Neoconstant is perhaps in error regards empirical equivalence and comparison. Sorry, mate, but you're maybe trying to be too er, reasonable...It's a conservative thing! In fact, because Neoconstant is such a very worthy site, these points have kept me awake all night in contemplation.

There is no proportional reality of Global Islam and the 57 various states of Hell that they inhabit with their official policy of Jew hatred, and a virtually impossible to calculate percentage wise, of local extremists such as abortion clinic bombers, who are dealt with through criminal law etc.

Ironically, it was Leftard radicals in the 1970's, who were reponsible for an unbelievable 20,000 or more violent domestic attacks on US soil, including armed robbery, arson, extortion, bombing and murder. And many have never been prosecuted, also boast about it, as per usual teach at Universities and clearly associate with Democrats. Then there's Europe.

"Paging the Baader Meinhoff and Red Brigades to reception. A call from the New York Times".

To naively believe or hope that Islam has somehow "drifted toward extremism" is simply mistaken. Extremism is not an anomally in Islam any more than murder, conformity and lies are an anomally of Communism and Nazism.

A doctrine founded by a mass murdering rapist and paedophile is by default, extreme. A doctrine that has at its core the eradication of all things un-Islamic is er, extremist. They haven't drifted. It's merely a case of now having the resources and opportunity, via oil money, technology, travel, PC Leftard multicultism and immigration.

[Note: I originally accused the pretty cool Neoconstant of er, "grovelling". Yes, rather boorish, rude and overdone of me, and I wish I hadn't.

Though what gets to me, is how many conservatives are just too damn thoughtful and agreeable, sometimes with people and views that we should simply NEVER agree with or accomodate to, or appear to. We are not always so combative really, and it can show with our lack of presence on the web and the media in general, the louder and fun examples withstanding. The sites removed that I've seen so far, are not worthy of the criticism aimed at them at all. And naff touchiness about often mild terms sans context, well...

In Australia, we often call each other bastards as a term of endearment. No, really. Sure, show me the rotten context and evil intent of a spooky site, and I'll be hip to the creepy of it all. Sorry folks, but I just don't dig the idea of trusting Harry's rather dodgy ideas of who and what is a worthy blog.]

Harry deserves support of course, but should be mature enough to handle a few blogs he doesn't approve of. Islam is bogus and requires no apologies. Here is my feeble comment at Harry’s sometimes not too sharp site.

"Dear sport, er, Harry, I support your right to free speech. No, really.

Even though mate, your site is sometimes rather sodden with Logical Fallacy, cant, canard and hyperbole. Steyn etc, would sue you? Riiight, sure he would! Give me a break. When, how, why? Nice dumb straw man and irrelevant subject change, kid. Stretching your Left cred in case an excellent comrade is looking at your current support?

"What, me pals with the Bush/Hitler people? No, way, man!" Ironic and laughable. Your nose is out of joint, eh?

As if...balls, mate. And er, there's no mirror image of the 52 Islamic states that oppress and murder gays, women and children etc, and support worldwide terror etc, in the Jewish or Christian world anywhere...Give me a damn example consummate to Iran, Syria, the UAE etc. Junk mate. The Jews and Christians the same as the people who have carried out over 11,000 major reported terror attacks since 9/11? AND 9/11? Ah, the logic…maybe the Jews did it with Bush/Hitler?! Pass me a “Truther’ vomit bucket.

Hey, as long as one says Koskid absurdities about Christians and Jews though, one can never be a bigot, eh?

It's no coincidence that Left sites are not supporting you as the Conservative blogs are. They never really do. And you know why. Are you saying this has not occurred to you? The Left talk freedom and diversity, but it's a fraud of every opinion as long as it's theirs. True conservatives at core believe in the individual first and limited government interference, especially foreign.

And the site you mentioned in the current Orwellian way as a "hate site" is no such thing. Islamists and PC Left Liberals now call any criticism of Islam defamation, because they cannot say blasphemy. It's a crock and you know it. Regards an authentic er, hate site, try evidence, via actual statements.

Harry, you’re getting more support than you may deserve personally, beyond your right to speak freely of course. Yep, I support your freedom of speech and mine, to slice and dice your mediocrity and lack of quality control, but Harry, you're often full of bog standard crap. Try humour, self reflection and honest maturity, kid.

Colonel Neville".


However, I found many of the comments fascinating such as these and many more:

Samuel Stott comments at Harry: “It really is time to get over the 18th century idea that all political positions can be assigned a place on a metaphorical left-right spectrum. Some people and political organizations and nations consistently support liberal-democratic rights of freedom of speech, freedom of assembly and association, freedom of religion, and freedom of the press. Most don’t.

That’s it and that’s all there is. You are either on the side of all of the above freedoms and the people and organizations and nations that honor them or you aren’t.

John P. on Harry: “On the question of anti-Muslim racism. Probably 50% of HP commenters are blatanty and overtly racist to Muslims.
Ah shut the fuck up! Would it interest you to know that the *sacred* texts used by for ALL muslims call for the death of gays. Just sayin’ as a gay man.

And quite performing your mortal preening on my back you disgusting, blinkered jackass before I boot you fuck off of it.

Everytime you buff-up your sick moral credentials, you righteous prig, you put the lives of ALL gays at a slightly higher risk.

Attacks on gays by Muslims are becomming an epidemic, you fucking retard. Quit facilitating those attacks!

Trundlemaster on Harry: “TJ said:”The Trots have been pretty quiet, haven’t they”

I’ve just popped over and looked at another left bulletin board called Urban75 which has quite a few SWP supporters on it and done a quick search to see if the publicity over the IslamExpo has caused any kerfuffle there and there is not word said. Nothing prior to 2006. There are posters on that site like other similar sites where Trots congregate like flies on rotten corpses and any challenge to the idea that extremist Islamism is not a threat to democracy is greeted by a chorus of ‘racist’, ‘Islamaphobe’ or ‘Tory’.

I might for the first time in years purchase a copy of Socialist Worker to see how deeply the Swaps are in denial about the Jihadist background to the organisers of IslamExpo.

There is a need for a national Islamic lifestyle exhibition but it should be pluralist not just a vehicle for extremists”.

Luke: “TT on Harry: “WHere are the great Leftists publicatsions - the Indi, Guardian etc.

Where is the great Leftist broadcasters, the BBC on this. Where are all the Leftist Human Rights people, like Liberty. I haven’t heard a peep from them.

Could it be that Human Rights was just a scam, used by the Left to gain power, money and influence where they have no right to be. Mmmmm”.

Like on Harry: "urban75 is full of wealthy middle class graphic designers and media types. They are living out a fantasy of being tough, radical. working class activists because they are enthralled to the Anti-capitalist movement and they have mortgages on Edwardian terraces in Brixton.

Proper radical man!!!!!!

They are middle class liberal tosers at their worst.

I went on the urban 75 forum to talk about why we as Leftists condemn right wing Christianity but give right wing Islamists a free pass.

Did an impassioned debate ensue? Did they listen to what I had to say and have an adult conversation? No they did not.

I was denounced as a racist by everyone who had a keyboard in front of them. It was like they didn’t even care what I had to say, I was a racist neocon because I dared to question a political/religious movement of an ethnic minority. I wasn’t supportive of the brown skinned anti imperialists of the third world. I wasn’t on the side of the good guys.

Which of course makes me a George Bush loving BNP supporter. I said time and time again that I didn’t support the war in Iraq but because I criticised Islam I was a neocon racist by default.

They are slaves to the dogmas of the Left. Urban75? Pathetic.

Jakester on Harry: “You folks can spin all sorts of stuff about who is more in favor of free speech(right/left) or are we being racist if we say or believe this or that or the Church did all these naughty things centuries ago so how can we rail against such things when committed by...

That is all bs. Look at the world, most of the wars these days involve Muslims attacking some other group (Philippines, Nigeria, Israel, Afghanistan, Kashmir, the Sudan) Some of the most oppressive, sexist and religiously bigoted regimes are Muslim, like the King of them all, Saudi Arabia.

This kind of pseudo intellectual argument is so redolent of the same intellectual vegetables who used to say that Communism isn’t bad, its the anti-Communists who are bad and causing these people to behave this way, or that country doesn’t have real Communism or it’s only a bad apple like Joe, Mao, Pol, Fidel giving this great way of life a bad name, or they have to seal their countries off so the counter revolutionaries won’t enter/escape and spread counter-revolution.

I judge Islam by the countries it creates and on that count, they are doing pretty poorly. Just compare India with Pakistan and Bengla Desh, cut from the same cloth in 1948. Which country has greater freedom and prosperity? Yes, I know the Hindu caste system is oppressive too. But at least modern Indians are moving away from that. Saudi Arabia won’t let Jews into their country".

John P. on Harry: "You can relable shit as sugar, but it won’t make it sweet. And you can buff and polish the Koran as much as you like, sweetie, but it still remains a turd. Now, off you go to feed the turks!"


Girl on the right on Harry: “I’m afraid you have our support whether you like us or not, Harry. Our wacky kind defend the freedoms of EVERYONE - not just people who agree with us. Try it sometime! RG”.

Afghan Whig on Harry: "The reason your website is getting sued is because your lawmakers subscribe to an irresponsibly broad definition of “anti-Muslim hate,” just as you do. By carelessly characterizing websites which are critical of Islam’s terrorist fringe as racist, you have helped create and sustain the atmosphere needed to legitimize the ridiculous lawsuit you’re contending with.

So on one hand I truly hope you win this case; Europe has been bullied by religious extremists for far too long. On the other hand, if you lose, you kind of did it to yourself. Cheers!"


“I love this hive, employee-ee,
Bisected accidentally.
One summer afternoon by me,
I love him carnally.

He loves him carnally,
Semi-carnally.
The end.

Cyril Connelly?
No; semi-carnally!
Oh. Cyril Connelly”. Eric the half a bee. Monty Python.

"Harry? Is that you?" The Geisha Boy. Jerry Lewis.

Billion dollar baby.

Meet the new mascot for The Emirates Melbourne Cup! It’s Omar the child slave camel jockey! Omar will be a special guest at the Members Dress Circle, straight from his daily beating and sodomising!

Our whole country seemingly stops for a horse race, but not to really understand and be aware of perhaps a damn thing that really matters. Still, have a white wine while you still can, you poor dumb Kafir bastards!

[The barefoot child camel jockey in the above picture is begging for water at a racing track in Dubai. He had been deliberately left tied under the hot sun with helmet, so that he bleeds through nose and thus reduces weight. During summer, the temperature goes well above 50oC (Asia Child Rights, 2004). Photo source: Ansar Burney Trust, 2004.] From Australian Islam Monitor.

Hey, go Emirates!





Ah, Saudi culture. I’ve seen less repellent cultures forming on a sewage drain outlet. And yet, there are so many things that I love about the United Arab Emirates, and they all add up to the fact that the UAE and Saudi Arabia are in the UAE and Saudi Arabia. Oh, wait a minute...there’s a lot of it over here in Australia too now! Oh goodie! And they started setting up camp in Australia around 1970. Forward planning. Fantastic!

Thus we unbelievably, the Emirates Melbourne Cup, the Emirates Collingwood Football Club, The Emirates Doncaster Handicap, The Emirates Western Force Football Club and The Emirates A.F.I. Awards etc, among seemingly endless massive United Arab Emirates and Saudi investments in Australia. [Enough to fill a six page PDF I will post soon.]

Like how massive, dude? Er, over the last ten years, millions and millions and millions of dollars.

But don’t worry...even though the Saudis have spent over 70 billion dollars worldwide largely on spreading the virulent, Nazi-like and insane 7th century dessert doctrine of Wahabist Islam, they ain’t up to nuttin’ secret here! No, really. Maybe we should listen to what Islamists tell us repeatedly and heed the warnings of Muslim dissidents. Could work.

Hey, what do ya think about this? Just go with me.

“The Emirates Parliament!?” Great, innit?

“We’ve spread Islamist influence everywhere we can by buying up land, business, real estate, institutions, brand names, events, advertising, people, University departments and media etc, etc, etc, but we Arabs would never do that in Australia. No way! Absolutely! Never! An Islamists word is his bond! Ok. We have. But just a little...ok, massively then”. Sheik Handzwizzadevil. [The bullshit artist formally known as Prince Number 50,000.]

“Billion dollar baby,
Rubber little lady, slicker than a weasel.
Grimy as an alley,
Loves me like no other lover,
Billion dollar baby”. Billion Dollar Baby. Alice Cooper.

You know what really won me over to the filthy rich shits of the desert, the ironically perverted sensualists and simultaneous super wowsers of neo-Dune? No, it wasn’t the Saudi’s massive funding of global Islamic terror.

Ironically, with the Melbourne Cup buy up and take over, it was their delightful and largely unknown nightmare of child camel jockeys. It’s a um, “cultural tradition” of the same wholesome folks who now run a gigantic PR campaign for Emirates Air, their professional Western enablers and via many, many high profile angles. Thank God they’ve got the enormous power and cash of Macquarie Bank to help and guide ‘em. Fills me with confidence in Australia's future!

“The purr wee thangs!” Aunty Doris.

You know cultural traditions? They’re the kind of cover all excuse and apologia that make’s me reach for my Luger! The FBI's Most Wanted List. Notice anything similar? Right! They're all related!

Sure, child slavery ain’t as many laughs as the tradition of Saudi women not being allowed to drive, work, travel, speak, laugh or do much like anything normal, like screaming as you’re executed for being raped or for talking to the opposite sex. But then, a lot of of what passes for sexuality in sand land, seems a little lopsided of normal.

Ah, tradition. Like the thousands of foreigners who do an unbelievable 80% of work in the UAE and Gulf states. From the Philippines and so on, they’re often entrapped, raped, enslaved, assaulted, murdered or just disappear. They don’t call it the Kingdom of Saud for nothing.

Ah, culture. Like the culture of Chop Chop Square, where every week they cut off all kinds of heads. A lot of folks don’t like being beheaded, so they ram a sword into their backside. Tradition! Culture! Air conditioned Hell! Hey, the tradition of Saudi Princes hiring whole floors of hotels or buying mansions and living invariably as uber perverts in the West and as the true hypocrites they are when returning to the East.

Funny about Tibet, but no interest on Muslim treatment of refugees, minorities and er, especially Muslims! Go figure.

All great traditions, I admit, but it’s the cultural tradition and a long one, of using thousands of two or five year olds and similar as virtual abused slaves, that are starved, beaten, raped, mutilated and murdered. Tied to camels as jockeys everyday, all day and for years if they live that long. Many are kidnapped and trafficked from Sudan, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Africa, Asia and other neighbouring states. This ain't fringe, it’s mainstream.

The endless progeny of the Saudi Royal Addams Family digs the midget dead child jockey scene. It’s all the rage! The law in the Middle-East is a game of the elites and there is no actual free media.

Yep, the Arabs who spend much of their petro dollars living like a cross between nymphomaniac pervert Pharaohs, all the seven deadly sins and Imelda Marcos on crack, are infiltrating and buying us up. Apparently they have sooooooo much to offer that we reaaaally need. Riight, sure they do!

Oh, I forgot. The vast piles of filthy cash thing. Check.

“Rubber little monster, baby, I adore you,
Man or woman living couldn’t love me like you, baby.
We go dancing nightly in the attic,
While the moon is rising in the sky.
If I’m too rough, tell me,
I’m so scared your little head will come off in my hands”. Billion Dollar Baby. Alice Cooper.

“...the United Arab Emirates is a destination country for men, women, and children trafficked from South and East Asia, Eastern Europe, Africa, and the Middle East for involuntary servitude and for sexual exploitation...

...the UAE is a drug trans-shipment point for traffickers given its proximity to Southwest Asian drug producing countries; the UAE’s position as a major financial center makes it vulnerable to money laundering; anti-money-laundering controls improving, but informal banking remains unregulated.” The CIA Factbook via Democracy Frontline Australia.

“I got you in the dime store,
No other little girl could ever hold you.
Any tighter, any tighter than me, baby,
Billion dollar baby”. Billion Dollar Baby. Alice Cooper.

“Race distances vary between 4 to 10 kilometers and may include anywhere from 15 to 70 camels or more (Hejaz, 2002). The Sheikhs of the UAE invest large sums of money into the development of camel racing throughout the Emirates, in addition to putting cash into the buying and training of camels in order to participate themselves in the races. Their interest and dedication is so much that they appoint specialists from all over the world with the primary goal of improving racing camel performance.

These children have to undergo a rigorous training schedule. It means working for about eighteen hours a day without payment. There is no holiday for them. Most jockeys only have a sheet on the sand for a bed and basic shelter. They have to work seven days a week in heats that even the local people shelter from (ABWT, 2004). Those who fall asleep are given electric shocks (in local language, this is called – giving a “KARBA”) as a wake up call (ABWT, 2005, Video Link 5). If they are tired and unable to carry out the orders of the trainer, they are tied in chains and mercilessly beaten.

Often, if they cry for their parents, they are tied up by the wrists with their feet dangling in the air and their tender bodies are kicked as a punishment, (Selby, 2004). The rescued children reported many stories of cruelty, as example, being tied up in chains in the desert heat, beaten with metal rods and leather whips, cut with blades and being raped by their “owners” (ABWT, 2005).

Other punishments include couple of days without food. They are often told by their trainers a story about being unwanted and being sold by their parents into slavery. They have no legal status and no one to protect them.

One nine year old rescued boy described that every week he used to see by his own eyes the deaths of about 20 children, and more than a dozen injured. He said "There was this one kid whose strap broke at the beginning of the race. His head was crushed between the legs of the running camel. Once the race has started it cannot stop”. (ABWT, 2005).

They are deliberately starved to prevent weight gain. Many of these children are fed with only two dry biscuits, or half dirty bread a day with water just to keep body and soul together (Selby, 2004). Some of them are not even that lucky. To reduce body weight, the owners often force the kids to wear metal helmets and leave them under the boiling heat of the desert so that they bleed through their noses and lose their body weight.

Another method of keeping them underweight is to force them to eat dirty and unhygienic food with seawater. The hope is that an upset stomach will stop the child from feeling hungry (ABWT, 2005). This saves the cost of the food and also keeps the kid underweight. Many of these children, who cannot tolerate this torture just collapse and die”. From Australian Islam Monitor.

Yep, I got hip to this story via the mighty AIM. A place where the empirical truth of Islam and it’s rotten activities in the West get a nice and rare airing. All easily verifiable sports, and after all, it’s hard to hide the Melbourne Cup, eh? Oh sorry, the Emirates Child Jockey Cup.

“Reckless like a gambler, million dollar maybe,
Foaming like a dog that’s been infected by the rabies,
We go dancing nightly in the attic,
While the moon is rising the sky”. Billion Dollar Baby. Alice Cooper.

Here’s just some of the wonderful world of Emirates in Australia. From Democracy Frontline Australia.

“Emirates Western Force Rugby.

Melbourne Symphony Orchestra. [Principal Partner Emirates Our Partnership.]

Emirates Australia Squad for ICC World Cup

Mt. Buller, Victoria. Ride the Emirates Discovery Chairlift!

Colonel Neville: “I will, baby!"

Emirates Kodak AFI Award.

Emirates sponsors Rugby World Cup. Wednesday, 14 February 2007.
Dubai-based Emirates, has further expanded its sponsorship portfolio by signing a deal to become official airline to Rugby World Cup 2007 in France.

“Qantas’s foe, Emirates Airline, was back on the radar this week, on another lobbying mission to double its number of flights here, something to which Qantas is implacably opposed. Emirates argues it warrants better treatment as its invested more than a billion dollars in Australia in the past decade”.

Emirates signs with Team New Zealand for the America Cup.
Dubai-based international airline Emirates today signed a lead sponsorship and naming rights agreement with...”

Emirates to sponsor Gold Coast racing.
Emirates, the Dubai-based international airline has announced its sponsorship of the Gold Coast Turf Club.

Emirates ties its hospitality to large sponsorships.
Eddie Lim is the Australian country manager for the Dubai-based airline Emirates, which has an immense corporate hospitality program. Lim said that in Australia, the companys main corporate hospitality events were tied in with its various large sponsorships covering the Victoria Racing Club (VRC), the Australian Jockey Club (AJC), and the Melbourne (MSO), Sydney (SSO) and West Australian (WASO) Symphony Orchestras.

Colonel Neville: "Ya gotta ask why acompany would do such smiley profile connections...so we all think:

"Hey, horse racing, pretty girls, fun and er... Islam? Hey, Islam ain't so bad then. It's the same as horse racing, pretty girls and fun! Maybe I gotta get me some of that Islam!"

In terms of racing, Lim said Emirates sponsorships with the VRC and AJC provided ideal opportunities to highlight the importance that the company placed on providing its guests with memorable, sensory experiences whether it be in the air or on the ground.

Colonel Neville: “Sensory experience? I bet they are. Jockey Club, eh? Ya can’t get in without a toy!”

"He highlighted the fact that the marquees in which Emirates hosted its guests at these racing carnivals were becoming legendary for their levels of luxury and originality".

Stephen Pearse, Emirates new VP discusses future plans. Monday, March 26, 2007. Amid the hub-bub of the service increases, the new Emirates Vice President Australia, Stephen Pearse, talks at a small media gathering about what Australia can expect from the Gulf airline in the months to come.
Foremost on everyone lips was...”

Colonel Neville: “Child camel jockey’s and beheading's?! Er, guess not”.

“...the new deal the Australian government had arranged with United Arab Emirates (UAE) which allowed Emirates and Etihad to double their services to Australia the signing of which saw the new vice-president in Dubai for...

Mr Pearse said that on top of this, Emirates will still pursue more interests in Australia as well saying, I’ll obviously continue to be a bigger airline, and we certainly do intend to be the second [largest] international airline, after Qantas, in Australia. Our investment here has been planned, significant, and will continue.

“...in more recent years the leaders of horse-mad Dubai in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) have taken a big interest in the events at Flemington. After all, it is called the Emirates Melbourne Cup, following the sponsorship by the UAE national carrier. And is this a bad thing?"

Colonel Neville: "Doik! Er, yes. Oops, I forgot about the great shit ples of cash again! My mind is like a sieve!".

"Emirates Chairman meets with Australian Prime Minister. Wednesday, February 28 2007. United Arab Emirates Vice President and Prime Minister and Ruler of Dubai, His Highness Sheikh Mohammed bin Rashid Al Maktoum met with Australian Prime Minister, the Hon. John Howard MP during his official trip down under.

As a state run airline, Emirates Airlines operations are under control of HH Sheikh Ahmed and, as a result, the meeting of the leaders was an appropriate time for the presentation of the first official Australian Cricket World Cup team shirt. The airline is the official sponsor of the Australian team for the Cricket World Cup to be played in the West Indies next month. Both leaders noted that the sponsorship was another example of the strong relationship between the Emirates and Australia".

Colonel Neville: “And this from an alleged Conservative PM in 2007. But then he did disarm us, didn’t he? Good grief. We are overwhelmed, clueless and thus most likely doomed”.

"The Liberal Party Of Australia.
The United Arab Emirates (UAE) is Australia’s 2nd largest trading partner in the Middle East and it is increasingly becoming a business hub for the whole region. Australia’s $8.4 billion trade with the Middle East has grown by over 60% since 1996. The UAE will be our first FTA partner in the Middle East and provide a first-class platform for further activity by Australian exporters into the region.

Emirates sponsorship splurge. Sunday, November 6, 2005.
“Introduce the low cost, long haul carrier, operating something like a 3-80 with 800 seats in it and you can start flying very long distances for very low unit costs, and you pass those through to the fares.”

Emirates Air sponsors the Melbourne Cup and, it seems, just about every other major event in Australia. Worldwide it spends US$200 million a year on corporate communications and sponsorship. Yet this expenditure is in stark contrast with other airlines, which have struggled to survive the past few years.

And Emirates keeps building, with 45 of the new giant A380 Airbus aircraft recently ordered. Critics say this is only possible because the company is propped up by government oil dollars". Source is Democracy Frontline Australia. From Democracy
Frontline Australia.

Here are the Four Stages of Islamic Treachery.

As Democracy Frontline Australia asks “Who owns Australia?” Why it's the people with the money, baby! And those people are people who need people...dhimmi people!

Like the Emirates do, mate. Gosh, do ya think they’re connected to any other unsavoury Islamic States? They are an unsavoury Islamic State! And yes! And er, gee, what do they all want, yo all? Everything. The revolution will not be televised until it’s completely in place...mate.

“If I’m too rough, tell me,
Im so scared your little head will come off in my hands.
Million dollar baby,
Billion dollar bay,
Trillion dollar baby,
Zillion dollar baby”. Billion Dollar Baby. Alice Cooper.

Billion killer babies.

Hey! It’s just like a PTA meeting! Yeah, of Perverts, Terrorists and Arseholes!

Dear sports, even among the avalanche of largely unreported insanity from Leftard land and Gods Islamic Monkey House, an article will somehow stand out. And not always cos’ it’s really unique, new or surprising. No, no. Sure it may have a certain charm, but more because it possesses the required trigger for a kind of epiphany. Like this true fable from freakville.

“About 2,000 Islamist women gathered at the radical Red Mosque in the Pakistani capital on Wednesday and vowed to raise their children for holy war, days after a suicide bomber killed 18 people after a similar rally.

Chanting slogans of "jihad is our way", burqa-clad women, some with babies, listened to fiery speeches from the daughter of the mosque's jailed cleric on the eve of the anniversary of a commando raid on the complex in which more than 100 people died.

"Our mujaheddin (fighters) laid down their lives for the enforcement of the Islamic system in Pakistan. We are left behind to carry forward their mission," the daughter of cleric Abdul Aziz told the tightly guarded rally in the mosque compound.
as the cleric's daughter, who did not identify herself, told the crowd to steel their families for holy war.

"We should prepare our children and men for jihad," she said.

The crowd responded with shrill chants of "we are ready" and "Al Jihad". From the Daily Mail.

Hey, that's completely:
A.) Insane.
B.) Sickening.
C.) Hell on earth.
D.) Moderate.

Now dig. This is just one little immensely ugly story that made it through the dreary limits of the MSM. Now do the math. In that part of the Islamic Paradise, many folks have typically three, six to ten or more children. A 2007 Pew report showed around 91 million Muslims worldwide are all for Jihad and the implementation of Islamic nightmare states everywhere, including the West.

Only nineteen Islamist geeks committed 9/11. And they didn’t have the lovely nukes like Pakistan does. And the one's that are kinda floatin' around...

How many junior homicidal zombies could 2,000 Jihadist incubators churn out over say twenty years or more if you start production as a child or teen bride? Then they have another wave of killers as grand children. Now that’s some family tradition!

Keep splitting the difference. Say 6 X 2,000 =12,000 then... No, better yet, start at half of 91 million. 6 X 45 million = 270 million. 3 X 270 million etc, etcetera. Get it? Sure, there are plenty of things that would effect any figures down as much as up. But any figure is deeply disturbing unless one is an avid wearer of the dhimmi asshat. And also, Jim, a lot more than 91 million Muslims worldwide rather unsurprisingly, support the goals of Islam. Name a good goal of Islam...

Kick a goal for Mohammad!

Yep, there’s a Hell of a lot of infant mortality in places that disqualify women from seeing any kind of Doctor. There’s a lot of mental retardation due to inter marriage of cousins and old men with children via arranged marriages etc. But so what? Islamist terrorist groups love to use the retarded as human bombs. And in the end, it is numbers.

And remember, there are people who feel this way in country, especially if one is unlucky enough to live near Sydney’s Lakemba Mosque. Though it appears to be largely a some kind of bizzarro Muslim ghetto or fast approaching it.

But enough with the times table. Think of the vast gulf, literally, between these profoundly deluded, nihilistic and dysfunctional psychopaths and say your local Mothers Club run school canteen.

“Ok, we’re in agreement on promoting healthy fruits, nuts and similar as snacks for the children. Any other suggestions?”

“Yes. More babies for Jihad!”

“Beheadings and car bombings!”

“Infiltration of Western institutions!”

“Ban music and humour!”

“I want a promotion and a raise at the New York Times!”

For many an apologist for Islam, these lovely ladies are simply er, “misunderstanding” things. So easy to do and they always are, eh? No, they ain’t. And so what if they were? It doesn’t matter.

Who is going to stop them from ah, “misunderstanding” and following through on their threats? No one, that’s who. There are actually millions and millions and millions of these abominations of humanity. It takes a whole deeply sick state, society, culture and religion to create such necrophiliacs. Islam my dears, is filled with vast armies of the lovers of all things dead and inhuman.

This is the terrifying memeplex of Islam. And no evil revolution by stealth has ever had a better friend than PC neo-Socialist Left Liberalism and multi-cultism. Then there’s no need or requirement to integrate at all, but rather to separate, demand and dominate. That’s Britain and Europe today, folks.

The parallel army of the dhimmi Left will naturally say this is isolated, taken out of context or when cornered, not true, even the photos. The thing is that these hateful pod people, are going to make their own children into useless, uber-nihilist and destructive monsters. And yet, within their piece of culture, this will be viewed as a norm and the ideal. Think what that means.

We teach our kids to be thoughtful and kind, to get along, to be creative, sunny and positive minded individuals. They teach their children to hate Jews, Infidels, Hindus, the West and so on infinitum to the point of no return.

Our kids blow up balloons and cut out pictures of animals and cars. They will learn to blow up pet markets, cafes and schools and cut off the heads of men, women and children. We grow up to see life as naturally myriad in light and dark, diverse, vibrating, filled with discovery, pulsing with potential, the unknown, laughter, tears, joy and the limitless.

They see life as static, proscribed, totalitarian, negative, perverted, stuffed with a 7th century absurdity and essentially worthless.

This my friends, is the end of the world as we know it.

“Aziz's wife, identified as Umm-e-Hassan, said they had nothing to do with the attacks. "We are not terrorists. Islam does not teach terrorism ... America and its stooges are terrorists," she told reporters at the rally, referring to the Pakistani army.

"We are holding this rally to tell the world we are alive and in high spirits. Islam can never be wiped out. It grows more after martyrs shed their blood." The Daily Mail.

Interesting is it not, how much their line of illogic, hyperbole, irrational America and Bush hatred matches the standard rhetoric and drivel of the Left? They have the utter arrogance and half wittedness to say simultaneously that they want to commit mass murder via their own children and then say it’s someone else who are the ah, real terrorists. It says so much and yet it’s nothing you can’t hear on most any campus, or in an interview with many a celebrity, on the ABC, NPR or a in a madhouse.

“Aziz was caught during the siege last year trying to slip through a cordon dressed in a woman's burqa. His brother, Abdul Rashid Ghazi, who was also a mosque cleric, was killed.

Ghazi's widow, identified as Umm-e-Hassam, said President Pervez Musharraf should be punished for ordering the crackdown: "This man is the enemy ... I want this man to be severely punished before I die," she told the rally.

The Red Mosque and an adjoining women's madrasa, or religious school, had for years been a bastion of militant support in Islamabad and the clerics and their followers had waged an increasingly defiant campaign to enforce Taliban rule.

They occupied a state library, kidnapped women they accused of prostitution and some policemen, and stormed music and video shops and beauty parlours, much to the dismay of the moderate majority in the capital”. The Daily Mail.

Ask someone to define what a moderate majority means, and who knows? The sophisticated and secular of Pakistan have almost sophisticated themselves into irrelevance and doom. They're amazingly afflicted with the same delusions and corruptions as the Left and Liberal elites of the West, except without the wheat grass.

It’s instructive how the Left peaceniks protest about US and Western nukes as if we’re just itchin’ ta use ‘em. And yet, India and Pakistan threaten a real nuclear exchange a few years ago, and none of them seemed to notice at all. The Leftard is distinguished by being virtually incapable of seeing conflict that doesn’t involve white people, but merely Asian, black or brown.

And most Left feminists are pretty damn comfortable in their willful blindness whenever they see a burqua, to say the monstrous freakery of having babies for the singularly insane purpose of murder. Because kids, one must not comment on cultural differences, unless in the positive.

Nope, never speak in the negative, even when confronted with a vortex-like abyss of nihilistic and murderous child abuse. Wear a smile and have a cake raffle!

I cant dance, so don’t ask me.

"Hey! Cool it! Can't we get a little maturity and sophistication here?! Sheesh! There's enough dead Islamist psychopath for everybody!"

At the Ayatollah Khomeini's funeral and May Clearance Sale, a "minority" of millions of Muslims tried to attach themselves to the old pervert for er, "legitimacy!"




Longmans Contemporary English Dictionary defines ‘cant’ thus: “Cant. 1 [kaent] N. Insincere talk about moral or religious principles by someone who is pretending to be better than they really are. A politician’s cant about family values. 2. Special words used by a particular group of people, especially in order to keep things secret: thieves cant. 3. A sloping surface or angle”.

For some folks there are no yes or no answers to anything, unless they’re aimed in mindless hyperbole at George Bush. This is a list of questions that have only yes answers when in the right "context". Meaning they are happening to you now, or these profoundly criminal acts have already been committed. That's unless of course, you’re the kind of person for whom the “context” can er, change.

“Is this a bomb blast? Are you cutting off my head? Am I being lashed for being raped? Are these dead children? Are you screaming Allah Akbar? Are you murdering the flight and cabin crew? Are you running over that child’s arm to punish un-Islamic behaviour? Are you beating that woman to death? Are you hanging that 14 year old boy for being gay?

Are you screaming death to Israel and all Jews? Are you repeatedly stating you want a global Islamic Caliphate by any means? Is it true that what happens to Israel will eventually happen to the West? Was the World Trade Centre destroyed by 19 Muslim loons? Etcetera”.


Dear sports, a guy who is not me and not called Roger Kaputnik, sent some questions to Waleed Aly. Aly is our local man from Mecca, and Australia’s seemingly smooth operator number one in the post modern art of auto-moral relativism. Ah, drifting on a sea of forgotten teardrops.

“Cry me a river and weep and moan for me, guitar”.

Not sure about reality? Reality is a punch to the head. Here's a formidable contender in the deeply empirical Dr Sanity.

So anyway, my baby wrote me a letter. The questions and points were regarding Wal’s mediocre op-ed for Wednesday July 09 in The Age newspaper. Sure it is! It was, dear reader, a standard Waleed piece where Wal just can’t seem to recognise, name or see Islamic terrorists for what they are. No, really. In fact it was so bog standard and stupid that only Philip Adams or similar could take it seriously. Not Roger Kaputnic asked what is Wal’s problem with relating Jihadists with terrorism? I think it may start with the letter M. That’s right. Macrame!

“Hey, what’s the thing with airline peanuts?”

This is in spite of the fact that an Islamic terrorist nearly always looks like a duck, er, Jihadist Muslim, and talks like a duck, acts, lives and plans like a duck, and usually lives in long established Islamic duck ponds with millions of other ducks. Go figure.

Roger asks that if all these millions of long-term Muslims call this violence Jihad, are they um, wrong? And do ya think a terrorist likes to kill civilians?

Do chimps like bananas? Here's the great nose on your face for a little insight and a few laughs.

And are J.I, Al Qaeda, Hezbollah, Hamas, Islamic Jihad, the IRA and ETA and the rest of the worlds destructive and unproductive geeks etc, gee, terrorists?

Pick the odd two out. Here’s a clue. They’re the two that are still insane, but are curiously not dreaming of a global Irish or Basque Caliphate.

And how asks Rodge, do ya describe the nineteen 9/11 hijackers? Is it just as people or Muslims? And does the threat of worldwide terrorism come from er, gosh, extremist Muslims? Lastly, do you think terrorists are ever justified in attacking people say at a supermarket, a pet market or a crèche?

So it was yours tediously, Not Roger Kaputnik”.



Mr Mojo Risin’ replies with er, my cute and fun lovin’ interjections...

Wal: “Hi [not Roger Kaputnik]”,

Hey, how ya doin’? How about those Redsox? Tell me Wal, are many Muslims worried about the backlash from tomorrows bombing?

Wal: “Thanks for your email. I'm flattered by your interest in my piece, and the topic”.

Yes, emails are pretty exciting events. Yes, a “piece” of something.

And do you mean flattered on behalf of the topic of Islamist serial killers? Er, a pro-typical op-ed in the peoples glorious broadsheet, AKA‘The Age’, is hard to miss, with the strange masked insult tone of it all, "...on the dodgy subject of are there UFO’s or indeed space people..." Oh, sorry, Jihadists. Check. Er, not “interest”, as much as a kind of voiceless sub nausea

“Ever get the feeling you’re being had?!” Johnny Rotten.

“Ever get the feeling you’re being Jihad?!” Colonel Neville.

Wal: “Regarding the question of "Jihadism", my objections to the term are two:”

Ah, any “objections” to the act or just the term? For me, Jihadism is not a question, as much as an answer by Islam to everything. Everything that is not Islamic and that’s just about anything that won’t fit on the back of a postage stamp, like everything that makes up the normal, healthy and successful free world.

I only have one objection to Jihadism: the relentless murder part.

Sure, I find the invariably ugly minds and matching faces objectionable too, but it’s really the blood and screaming that focus my mind. Yes, the blood and the screaming...

Wal: “1)...that, as a matter of theory,”

Er, Jihad is not a theory as yet unproven. It’s a continuous and daily series of acts all documented, that have no limits on their beyond belief depravity.

A tiny sample: The planting of bombs in a children’s pet market; the blowing up of 27 children getting candy and toys from marines; the multiple car bombing of hundreds of school girls having lunch; the beating to death of school girls; the hanging of retarded thirteen year olds and the use of the mentally deficient as human bombs.

Or the mass murder of gays minors; the indoctrination of toddlers in the pathological hatred of Jews and of homicide/suicide bombing as a career path; the licking up of blood after an assassination; the endless beheadings; gang rape as the official policy of theocratic nightmare states; eight year old child brides and genital mutilation; the beheading of Christian school girls in Northern Thailand among the 150,000 murdered by Muslims over twenty years, and all part of over 11,000 reported major Islamic terror attacks since 9/11 and so on into the awful night.

Wal: "Jihad" is a very poor description of terrorism. I've explained this in a fair bit of detail in my book if you're interested in reading further on it”.

Not really. Funny, terrorism is a very good description of Jihad, mate. Of course, the inverted brackets and matching inverted morality of post modern theorising and apology, just adds that something extra, as only true gibberish can. Yeah, ya book. Ali’s Adventures in Wahabistland. For many a boob, it can seem that the Devil is never in any of their alleged details.

Another good description of Jihad would be as a fantastically terrifying memeplex and endlessly clever tactic of deception. Oops, Taqiyaa again. But do Taqiyaa on. I have a great description of Jihad I’ve been workin’ on.

I define Jihad as something that wants me dead and clearly plans to destroy everything I value and care about. But try this humble and incomplete list anyway.

Er, this may ring a few bells. Start with agonised screaming and vast swathes of blood, incredible noise, explosions, intimidation, heartache, oceans of tears and sorrow, extortion, kidnapping, beheading and add organised crime to raise funds. That’s usually a queue for subject change to whatever. Anything but stay on topic, eh? Um, but I can. Hey, has Islamic Jihad been done to death? Then it’s working!

Jihad is a globally recognised brand name for the major Muslim modus operandi of spreading Islam by any means as clearly stated and acted upon by the example of Mohammad/The Koran. They are one, you see. Ya can’t argue with the free market of death, destruction and dhimmitude, can ya?

Funny, in fact it’s a riot, how old Islamic terror has “definition” problems but not detonation problems. Odd how Jihad always involves three guys name Mohammad. Curious how the cheery global Jihad thang, is not um, really equated with Taoist, Buddhist, Animist, Anglican, Hindu, Seventh Day Adventist or um, anyone else really.

How come when Muslims commit crimes that are easily defined by the criminal code, there’s always some fault on behalf of the victims? Why is it that I can define every kind of violence such as assault, rape, murder, kidnapping, beheading and bomb blasts, unless a Muslim does it?

Why can I define say Kamikaze, as the deliberate smashing of explosive laden planes by proudly deluded, suicidal and homicidal pilots of Imperial Japan into Allied targets? Or Blitzkrieg as a mechanised, fast moving, total war strategy utilised to great effect by Adolf Hitler, using maximum force against military targets and civilian populations. But some people just can’t allegedly seem to be able to define Jihad and terrorism? Gee, why is that?

Jihad my friends, is a series of clear acts that can all be empirically defined.

Here is a definition of terrorism for the morally, intellectually and tactically useless.

The deliberate and indiscriminate targeting and murder of civilians and military personnel including, children, women and men, using extortion, arson, shooting, kidnapping, torture, bombing, mutilation and beheading etc, for political and or religious aims.

Yep, even here is a suitable launching pad for a million University and Mosque designed bogus deconstructs and diversion tactics. The key is that Islamist killers backed by Saudi money, Iran and many others, are attacking the free West of the USA, Britain, Australia, Europe, Israel, the Mediterranean, Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Asia, India and just about everywhere. Much like Hitler, Imperial Japan and Fascist Italy did.

We are under attack by a continuation of a 1300 year old cancer, simply with renewed resources. Islam is a doctrine of asymmetrical and continuous warfare by stealth and frontal assault.

And here’s the thing. This kind of endlessly complex philosophising Leftard wank is like the ever spreading branches of a tree. There’s no end to the detours and side tracks of obfuscation and deception. The problem is that such minds are actually useless, in that they are incapable of seeing anything decisively, clearly or effectively. Oh, except when feverishly imagining the West and Israel etc, as the root of all evil. Blah, blah, woof, woof.

The error is that they’re going the wrong way up the tree. As Bruce Lee said, strip away all the layers and go down to the simple root.

There you will see the shocking cause of Islamic terror is and always has been dah, dah! Islam itself. It’s a self perpetuating hatred if one cares to look. It is my friends, a complete system for a state of endless warfare, [Jihad!] by the realm of Dar Al Islam, [Muslim] against the realm of Dar Al Harb, [Infidel and the place to wage continuous war!] for the singular goal of total Islam.

But then my intelligence is no match for your wilful ignorance.

After 1940, no one had any problem defining Blitzkrieg as a method and what its effect and purpose was. After Pearl Harbour, no one had any problem defining aerial attacks in the same way. It is a lie and a common Islamist tactic to obfuscate and distract the Infidel with bogus hair splitting of the er, "true meaning" and allegedly ah, the “correct definitions”. And always with the outrageous posit that those being destroyed and threatened by Islam are simply somehow "misunderstanding" why they were murdered.

But then the goal of any Islamic apologist and deceiver, is to make it impossible to define their behaviour at all, so that it can't be dealt with effectively. This is shown clearly when the same people have no problem in defining every action and indeed inaction by Democracies, as wrong. Thus the current totalitarians at heart of the Left, have joined comfortably with many Muslims, to destroy free speech.

It’s not true at all that Jihad means a kind of inner struggle, in the way Western people may see that as inferring a purely philosophical one. The only inner struggle in Islam is how to be a true Muslim and serve Islam by literally any act. All is permissable in the sevice of Islam.

The only inner struggle of Jihad is how to destroy the non-believer. The true face and purpose of Jihad is understood exactly by many Muslims, but quite a few do so love to blatantly lie and fool the naïve Kafir. Amazingly, it usually works.

The concept of a culture built on lies and deception, with the ultimate goal of a global Caliphate by vile means and over vast periods of time, is beyond the thinking of the average person, living as they do in an open and normalised society. The West functions entirely in the end on trust, whether one admits and understands this, or not. The fundamentals are essentially voluntary

Wal: “2) that, as a matter of strategy, it is self-defeating to use any derivative of "Jihad" to describe terrorism because it actually gives an air of legitimacy to it”.

It’s not self defeating to call Jihad what it is, which is the prime modus operandi of the Islamist for spreading Islam. This is how Islam was created, founded, established and spread, baby. By the sword of the Jihadist warrior. The only “self defeating” act is to be such a PC Leftard that you can’t even recognise or name a clear and mortal enemy. Now THAT'S the problem, innit?

Legitimacy, schmitacy. I thought that was your job.

The old baloney that Islamic violence is all rather isolated and committed by a small proportion of Muslims doesn't match the numerical facts. It's balls. 52 Islamic states are not a minority.

Over 91 million Muslims worldwide have been conservatively estimated as supporting Jihadist terror and its goals of changing Western democracies into Islamic states with Sharia law. This by definition, is not a minority. 35% of Muslim males 15 to 35 in Britain, all pining for the coming Islamic wonderland, are not a minority again, by definition. People who have amorphous views on the oh so gauche thinking skills of being able to define anything, are surprisingly prone to defining say, white Western Christians as an unlimited evil.

But here’s more standard semantics overload.

Wal: “Regarding the definition of terrorism, I'm afraid it's a little more complex than simply saying the term applies to people who target civilians”.

Yes, it would be. Complex. Yes, of course. Er, not if you’re the civilian being targeted, then it’s elemental and immediate, with zero grey area. Sure it may be harder to do for a slim customer, living in a free democratic state like Australia, all while writing sub par bunk for a dull broadsheet. Great work if you can get it.

Wal: “I do not deny that terrorist’s describe their conduct as Jihad. Clearly they do. And they do so for a reason, because then they can buy into something legitimate. I see no reason why we should capitulate to their terminology. It seems odd to allow them to establish the semantic
field”.

You hang on to that if it makes you happy, "...just like ya Momma did for me, ee, ee, ee!"

I see no reason we should “capitulate” militarily, politically or culturally to their terminal atrocity. Capitulate, eh? What that says to me is “...don’t listen to what they say, just cos’ they mean it, folks!”

It's kind of the creepiest paragraph and reveals something pivotal. Some people just can’t speak straight for sustained periods of time. So “terrorists” and not actual Muslims, and only “describe”, and not authentically Islamic? No one is being beheaded by a description are they? Why would Muslims have to buy into Islam? Because it’s er, legitimate? Give me a break.

No, they don’t describe as you say, for any other reason that they are in fact Muslims, following the teachings of Mohammad/Koran/Islam. All for one an’ all for one.

Let’s call Jihad tap dancing then. That’ll stop it. Er, you seem pretty successful at and eager to “establish the semantic field” yourself there. I thought that was the whole gist? No? Mostly convoluted balls though, innit?

Oddly, Islamists actually do have deconstruction fests, but it’s about how to successfully and easily manipulate the Western media, and how many thousands they have on their side. Of course tthey never neglect the non-theoretical attack. Good grief.

Wal: “Firstly, what is the definition of "civilian" or "non-combatant?”

Er, that’s the person who was a moment ago buying some cheese and is now screaming in a pool of their own blood. It can be an Israeli Ambassador who is having his blood licked in the lobby of a hotel up by Muslim killer. Secondly, if you honestly don’t know what a civilian is, stay the fuck away from my children.

Wal: “Does it include soldiers who are not on duty at the time? Does it include the defence infrastructure of a country? So for example, was the September 11th attack on the Pentagon, not a terrorist attack? Was Al Qaeda's attack on the USS Cole a terrorist attack?”

While I’d love to linger on every one of the disgusting faux questions above, that maybe only some kind of bastard could seriously proffer and be paid for writing, I’ll sum them all up so to speak. Yes, yes, and yes it was a terrorist attack, [get glasses or help] and er, yes.

Especially if the people under attack are the citizens of free, open, prosperous and democratic countries, and the people attacking us are Islamist freaks whose sole purpose is the spread of Islam. That’s as per the world’s greatest asymmetrical warfare handbook, the Koran, and its main maniac, Mohammad. So er, yes. Oddly, I can feel via what is not said, that Muslim terrorists maybe have some kind of sub-reasonable beef after all. But we in the free West apparently don’t and never really can.

“Can you feel it? Can you feel it? Can you feel it?”

Wal: “Secondly, there is considerable disagreement about whether or not it is necessary to target civilians, or indeed people at all, for an act to be deemed terrorism”.

Hey, that’s great! So ya talkin’ about it then? Toppo! To kill women and children or not, and with whom exactly? That’s nuance, right? And who is disagreeing with who? Maybe Mother Theresa with Bin Laden?

Mother Theresa: “We should not kill anybody!”

Bin Laden: “For Islam, there isn’t anybody we shouldn’t kill! But not me of course, that goes without saying!”

Ah, there’s always disagreement among those with no moral compass and limited to zero rational thought processes. Academics: your guarantee of nothing but bad grooming and total ineffectiveness.

Wal: “As I mentioned in the piece, the US, Britain and
Australia all define terrorism to include violence against property. Many academics do the same”.

Yes they do. The same. And that’s the problem with academics entirely. But please, drone on.

Wal: “In fact, one academic study concluded that a surprisingly small minority of academic definitions of terrorism required the attack to be aimed at civilians or non-combatants. So it's a complex area that academics haven't yet resolved, and won't any time soon”.

Big ‘effing surprise. Ten academic studies can be worth less than one.

Many academics only seem capable of resolving anything up to the point of either the vague, fashionable or Leftard dogma. What about some field studies by serving military men and women and law enforcement agencies? Like the studies that show most funding for terror comes from Middle-East states via oil revenue and Muslim immigrants via crime and front companies? From the Saudis, it’s to the incredible tune of over 70 billion bucks pumped worldwide over the last decade. Add Communist states and ditto your Uncle.

Wal: “In response to your specific questions: I would consider all the groups you mentioned to be terrorist groups”.

Er, isn’t that a little judgemental and thus so un-PC?

Wal: “How I would describe the 9/11 hijackers would depend entirely on the context in which I was describing them”.

Ah bet it wud! I’d describe them as Muslims and killers. I knew the clarity couldn’t last and it didn’t! So it’s straight back into the house of bullshit, and with all the solid judgement of a rat in a burning crack house. Great eh? I got that from ‘Two and a Half Men’. That’s the sitcom, not the aftermath of a car bombing by the religion of peace.

Er, what context can the 9/11 hijackers, the Muslim 9/11 hijackers be described in, except by the facts of their behaviour and their intended and achieved result? They had like, another intent, other than what we witnessed? Er, no.

So they acted other than deceptively, all to commit mass murder for Islam? Nope again. Maybe they served party pies and wore festive hats! Hey, while slashing the throats of air hostess’s and stabbing the pilots in the eyes over several minutes! Fill me in, bub. I’m all fucking ears.

Wal: “What do you mean by "world wide terrorism"? I'd certainly say that Muslims are the biggest participants in what I call "global terrorism", but they would not constitute most, or perhaps even a majority of terrorists worldwide”.

Let me say that anyone who asks such a spooky and fraudulent question, perhaps has no real interest in the answer. Er, what do I mean? Let’s stay with Charades!

World and wide means all over the bleeding world I believe. For terrorism, re-read the previous. So they’re “the biggest” but not “most” or a “majority?” What the Hell does that mean? Here’s a fact. Most Muslims are not terrorists but most terrorists are Muslim and that takes a lot of in-house support. That’s unless of course they’re maybe operating from a space station orbiting the earth.

All Jihadist scumbags believe in Jihad as proscribed by the Koran and the Hadiths, which are Mohammad and Mohammad is them, as we are all together.

Wal: “I cannot imagine circumstances that justify the targeting of civilians”.

I’m sure you can. And all in the imagination, I'll wager.

Wal: “...but then most of the Western world felt comfortable with Churchill's deliberate bombing of German civilians during WWII”.

See, I knew you could imagine it and you did! So Winston Churchill was ah, a terrorist or just another bad Western leader?!

“Sure thing! Brides maid! Optical promise! It’s the only solution! Isn’t it amazing?” Shaman’s Blues. The Doors.

Wal: “Hope that helps, Waleed”.

Actually it does. It says so much while saying absolutely nothing of worth.

That last part on Churchill, how can I put this? It’s an enormous steaming pile of Logical Fallacy. Subject change to a straw man, with a false argument etc, etcetera. Sure, it’s also glib, fatuous, juvenile and disingenuous. Or is that a stupidly ignorant reading of WWll, to the point of monstrous absurdity, regards the empirical reality of the harsh facts of a fight for survival?

Whenever I read stuff like this, I’m not sure where the demarcation point is from the phony to the plain dumb. Read enough of what laughably passes for intellect and analysis in the mostly mediocre Age and our dull and fake media, and you can feel like you’re in a Hall of Mirrors, going mad or both.

“I’m a tea pot! I’m a tea-pot!”

The first sign of madness is not talking to your self, its hearing logically, evidential and morally disembodied voices from the netherworld, the heart of darkness, that is Islamism. Then embracing it.

Oh, and that reminds me. The group that gets murdered the most due to Islamic terror, oppression, disorder, dysfunction, corruption, blame shifting, lies, absurdity and paranoia, are called Muslims. That’s men, women and children. How does baloney help them exactly?

Let’s deconstruct and discuss!

The Great Bloat of St. Ives.

The only head that can be seen from space.



[Here's an old favourite from Monday 17 December 2007.]

People still speak today about The Great Bloat of St. Ives. Sadly, I am that person, as no one had ever heard of The Great Bloat of St. Ives, until now. Have you heard of The Bloat of St. Ives? I believe you have.

Oh, The Great Bloat of St. Ives is a wondrous thing, a wondrous thing to behold, is The Great Bloat of St. Ives. People come from far and wide to admire its width and pay homage. "Oh, show us the way, Great Bloat of St. Ives!" they implore, and the Great Bloat obliges like clockwork, expanding itself to enormous proportions until it reaches a full and majestic bloatedness. Hence the name, The Great Bloat of St. Ives.

Excuse me, but have you heard of The Great Bloat of St.Ives?

The Great Bloat of St. Ives has said many wise and profound things. If The Great Bloat of St. Ives is about anything, wisdom and profound things are what The Great Bloat of St. Ives is all about. For example, The Great Bloat of St. Ives has said that, “one word sums up probably the responsibility of any Vice President, and that one word is to be prepared”.

Yes, if you want to be ready for anything, anything at all, being prepared is one thing I always recommend, even to the deaf and blind. Be prepared, I say, be prepared!

Hence, The Great Bloat sayeth “we are ready for any unforeseen event that may or may not occur”.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives is a wondrous source of pure gold, a source of pure gold is he. If you can’t get pure gold from The Great Bloat of St. Ives, I can’t help you. Nay, you are beyond helping. I cannot reach you no matter how much reaching I may do. Such as the following, which is something I live by religiously.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: “It isn't pollution that's harming the environment. It's the impurities in our air and water that are doing it”. And they are. I can feel them doing it now, even through the linoleum.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "For NASA, space is still a high priority”.

Space is something that The Great Bloat of St.Ives is determined to fill.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "It's time for the human race to enter the solar system”. I myself have taken serious steps to enter the solar system by leaving my lounge room to go to the local shop and get another pack of Pall Malls. It’s a small step for a Mars Bar but I’ll have a packet of crisps too, thankyou.

Again, I can put my hand on my heart and say as The Great Bloat of St. Ives has said, "Quite frankly, teachers are the only profession that teach our children”.

Aah, yes, a wondrous thing is an education. I myself am the product of one.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "The Holocaust was an obscene period in our nation's history. I mean in this century's history. But we all lived in this century. I didn't live in this century”. Oh yes, a nasty business was your Hitler. Do you know that Hitler invented Auto Barn?

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "We're all capable of mistakes, but I do not care to enlighten you on the mistakes we may or may not have made”.

I myself am only capable of mistakes. When I have foolishly done something that makes any practical sense whatsoever, quick as a flash, I cover it up with something stupid, leaving no one the wiser.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "I believe we are on an irreversible trend toward more freedom and democracy, but that could change”. Irreversible we are indeed. No matter how many times I have stood in my front garden covered in soup imploring to the Heavens, "Reverse! Reverse!", not once have I been able to return to last Tuesday.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "Verbosity leads to unclear, inarticulate things”. Indeed it does. I was saying to my Aunty Doris only last Tuesday, I think I’ve reversed, Aunty Doris. Every Tuesday Aunty Doris says to me "You say that every Tuesday. You must be reversing again, dear".

"I have made good judgments in the past. I have made good judgments in the future”. Sadly, I have never had the privilege of making any good judgements as I can never get the right kind of timber. I’m afraid of using chipboard, fear it I do, as it expands in the rain and we don’t have a ceiling.

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "The future will be better tomorrow”.

Aunty Doris: "What day is it?"

Colonel Neville: "It’s Tuesday. Everyday it’s Tuesday, especially on Thursdays. In fact, it’s been Tuesday all week. Wednesday is not until Monday. And Saturday was last Monday. Friday has been postponed due to a lack of interest and they’re replaying Sunday".

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "We're going to have the best-educated American people in the world”.

Aunty Doris: "Are you Mr Barnes?"

Colonel Neville: "Yes I am. I’m Mr Barnes as I’ve been all my life, both man and boy".

Aunty Doris: "Is there any lettuce? Don’t threaten me with your salad!"

Colonel Neville: "Not with my legs".

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "We have a firm commitment to NATO; we are a part of NATO. We have a firm commitment to Europe. We are a part of Europe”.

Aunty Doris: "When does this film end?"

Colonel Neville: "At the beginning, around July".

Aunty Doris: "I don’t like the people in it!"

Colonel Neville: "Who does? They’re all actors".

Aunty Doris: "Well, when does it start?"

Colonel Neville: "It never does, I’m afraid".

Aunty Doris: "But it’s half way through!"

Colonel Neville: "See what I mean".

Aunty Doris: "You can’t keep me here like a caged lion!"

Colonel Neville: "Hence the fleas".

Aunty Doris: "What day is it?"

The Great Bloat of St. Ives: "I stand by all the misstatements that I've made”.

Have you heard about The Great Bloat of St. Ives? So wondrous is he. I believe you may have...

Jonathon Livingstone Seagull I presumed.

"One is the loneliest number that you'll ever know..."



Sadly, with the uber conformity of socialist global warming, Jonathon Livingston Seagull's habit of breaking away from the lemming like herd, is now instinctively seen by the Left Liberal as problematic. As the pacifist and pinko perversely like to do, they simply shot him down as a profoundly relevant part of the zeitgeist. Maybe the non-salad carressing ate him with some gravy sauce?

They can drop in an instant, any allegedly deeply held values previously advocated and forced onto everyone else for decades. Just like that! Witness the dumping of feminist ideals and gay rights for laughably imagined kudos from Islamists. Well, they are anti-American after all.

“Well I remember when I was young,
The world had just begun and I was happy.
I used to wonder about the earth,
And how it moved around the sun so snappy.

Imagination goin’ wild,
Makes a very backward child, they told me.
So back at school I’d sit around,
Just waitin’ for the sound, so I could go home.

Sometimes I think about it...it happens every day.
I should think of the present, cause the present’s now”. I Remember When I Was Young. Matt Taylor and Chain.

Dig, the Left Liberal is naturally full of contradictions. No, really. The basic one is that any Conservative government is a vast and convoluted conspiracy of evil sans any court ready evidence whatsoever. And yet every Libs main aim is to give total power to the state and thus via an ever expanding government.

And er, won’t a Conservative government be elected at some point? Gee, and doesn't everything Liberal only grow out of the base of capitalist democratic freedoms created by individuality and Conservativism, and not the other way round? Gosh, they squawk that Capitalism is a failure. Sure it is! And yet they want to take the real wealth and prosperity created only by allegedly "failed" Capitalist innovation and the productive, and give it away without any goal seemingly beyond the cynicism of welfare.

They love to say “Fascist!” Yet they all want to disarm the mass of ordinary people, which is always the first step of every fascist dictator. Curious, innit?

George Bush the fully qualified jet pilot, is apparently so stupid, and yet he managed to somehow fool most Democrats and Congress into originally supporting the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq. So George is simultaneously an evil genius and a moron and this presents no logical absurdity to a Left Liberal. Er, if George allegedly lied about WMD's, which he didn't, um, "...why didn't he just dump some fake evidence around Iraq?"

Oh I know. He was an evil Mastermind for the WMD part, but a dolt for the planting of evidence bit. Gotcha. Check. And to what end? That's right. Apparently to secure an easily traded commodity like oil at higher cost, while spending billions of dollars, thousands of military personel and guaranteeing he'd lose office even if he had another term. Riiight. That's some genius plan the President has there.

Could it be that like Truman, Eisenhower, JFK, Lincoln, Roosevelt, Reagan or Johnson, [all with some greatness, flawed and with their own glaring limitations] the in some ways excitingly average George Bush, is a fairly decent and ordinary man?

Maybe like Lincoln, he's simply trying to do his inarticulate best as demanded of every Presidency, and currently under rather extremely difficult, peculiar and almost impossible circumstances?

"In determining reality, Sherlock Holmes maxim, was that "when you have excluded the impossible, whatever is left, however improbable, must be the truth".

Left Liberals are allegedly for absolute freedom of expression and lifestyle, and yet their heroes are people like Che the child killer Guevara; a totalitarian Fascist Communist who hated long haired hippies, rock n’ roll, film makers, writers, black people and gays.

Here's a nice speech by Swedish Parliamentarian Goran Lindblad, on the vast and ongoing crimes of Communism. More here and here and here.

Every Left Liberal says they believe in feminist ideals and the complete and equal rights of women. And yet they support by default and actively, sharia creep and the absurd equivalence of Islam. Islam is to put it mildly; a harsh 7th century desert and totalitarian doctrine, hallucinated by a paedophile and rapist. It’s a total way of organising only an Islamic theocracy, a form of authority that can only exist via the relentlessly vicious and ongoing oppression, assault and murder of girls and women. Go figure.

“Rebel, rebel, you’ve torn your dress.
Rebel, rebel, your face is a mess.
Rebel rebel, how could they know?
Hot tramp, I love you so!” Rebel Rebel. David Bowie.

What happened? We arrive at today, where the Left who gabbed for decades about individuality, are now often virulent supporters of the mass conformity of global warming orthodoxy. A mental place where any dissent from the dominant mass by rational and questioning individuals is strictly verboten. It's now treated as a non-PC thought crime against the earth Gods, the state and the er, “people”.

“To the tumbrels and on with the pointed cone hats, Comrades!”

Now I remember the corny book Jonathon Livingston Seagull, that made such a splat during high school. It’s central theme of the single and outvoted, outnumbered and misunderstood rebel, maintaining his individuality against the dominant and conformist group of boobs, was well, a major hippie theme. Not any more though, eh?

“Vot is zer ideological fashion for today, Comrade? Please, I must know vot my opinion iz!”

Man, it's plain to see that there's nothing rebellious about Left ideology at all. Never was if you followed it to its natural and logical end, which is the socialist conformity of a Brave New World, but without the laughs. The real rebels of today are variations on the rational and empirical Conservative, the Libertarian, iconoclastic, contrarian, the renaissance of mind and Judeo Christian, all with a sharp sense of humour and ridicule. Hey, that’s me, Evan Sayet, P.J O’Rourke and the Steyner etc!

Left belief is a mechanical and platitudinous package wrapped up in a drab and largely humourless fancy dress. Whenever people start mouthing Left clichés by numbers at me, they appear much like a cheap and soiled whore; bought and sold in the market place of second hand non-ideas.

Though with a prostitute, you generally know what they're selling, and thus you know what you're buying. And one often gets one's money's worth. With Left Liberalism, freed from the harshness of the free market, it's usually other peoples money and mostly worthless.

“Crawling down the alley on your hands and knee,
I'm sure you're not protected, for its plain to see,
Diamond Dogs are poachers, and they hide behind trees,
Hunt you to the ground they will, mannequins with kill appeal”. Diamond Dogs. David Bowie.

Thus I can say to a Leftard that President Armachimphead of Iran has murdered 4,000 gay people and the response is that “What about George Bush?! He’s murdered a million gay people!” And while the former is rejected by default, for many a moonbat, the latter is perfectly acceptable as a rational statement of fact. Having no standards of discriminating, objective and evidential thought is their standard.

“Will they come? I keep a friend serene.
Will they come? Oh, baby, come unto me.
Will they come? Well, she's come, been, and gone.
Come out of the garden, baby, you'll catch a death in the fog.
Young girl, they call them the Diamond Dogs.
Young girl, they call them the Diamond Dogs”. Diamond Dogs. David Bowie.

So what exactly became of the worthy message of Johnny the beach pecker? For decades it was an absolutely pivotal idea of personal freedom and of a healthy democratic society. You know, the perhaps enlightened, inspired and original individual versus the sometimes stale, uniform and mindless mob? Er, now the latter is seemingly the right on fashion, while the former is naturally the enemy. That’s if an individual refuses to express their proscribed individuality via the current idiot paradigm of the faux and ersatz.

As Frank Burns from M*A*S*H said “Sure, individuality is great. As long as we all do it together!”

“In the year of the scavenger, season of the bitch,
Sashay on the board-walk, scurry to the ditch.
Just another future song, lonely little Keats,
There's gonna be sorrow, try and wake up tomorrow”. Diamond Dogs. David Bowie.

So Left Liberals care about the environment. Why? Because “...there won’t be anybody alive without it!" And yet, many of the major figures of the enviro-freak religion, have stated clearly that they see people as a “virus” and a “cancer” that should be greatly reduced via deliberate sterilisation, coercion, infection, poisoning and mass murder. Oh, but all for the good of the God of Gaia, mate.

"This aint rocknroll...this is genocide!" Diamond Dogs. David Bowie.

Such nihilist totalitarian bastards should not be allowed real power over a single household pet, never mind over billions of free, individual and naturally flawed human beings.

“Who, who, who?
Call them the Diamond Dogs.
Who, who, who?
Keep cool.

Beware of the Diamond Dogs.
Beware of the Diamond Dogs”. Diamond Dogs. David Bowie.

Stop Ross Garnaut before he kills again!

My God! Call the Police! 4,000 people are going to be killed! It’s Ross 'what me worry?' Garnaut! MAD Magazine and Alfred E, Neuman’s got nothin’ on Ross! And who says academics are dorks and mega dags? What a swinger and so self aware! Yep, Ross is apparently sensitive to the environment, but perhaps not the dating environment.

“Come in here, dear boy, have a cigar.
You're gonna go far, fly high,
You're never gonna die,
You're gonna make it if you try;
They're gonna love you”. Have a Cigar. Pink Floyd.

Deaths due to Global Warming are exactly zero. People dead due to Left Socialist ideology are more than a 100 million and counting. But don’t worry, with bio-fuel food production diversion and stopping development in the third world, the Left can even it up nicely. Here's eco-imperialism.

Wikipedia: "Atmospheric scientist Reid Bryson said in June 2007 that "There is a lot of money to be made in this... If you want to be an eminent scientist you have to have a lot of grad students and a lot of grants. You can't get grants unless you say, 'Oh global warming, yes, yes, carbon dioxide".

About four billion bucks in 2007. Hey, yeah, the world is acting just like a greenhouse eh? You mean a greenhouse with ice and snow and oceans and air currents and mountains and plains? Like that kind of greenhouse? There’s no way I could grow rhubarb in that! But Ross Garnaut can!

“Well I've always had a deep respect,
And I mean that most sincerely.
The band is just fantastic,
That is really what I think.
Oh by the way, which one's Pink?
And did we tell you the name of the game, boy,
We call it Riding the Gravy Train”. Have a Cigar. Pink Floyd.

It's full steam ahead. To paraphrase someone, education does little to nothing regards curing stupidity. In fact it often enhances it. According to Professor Ross McFarter Garnaut, 4,000 people in Queensland will die from heatwaves caused by the massive fraud and gravy train of climate change. Balls. [From the Herald Sun Saturday July 05 2008.]

Nowhere in this front page hack piece, does it say how he got this incredible predictive ability. Maybe from Merlin, Nostradamus or God? Apparently method and testable evidence is not important when one is proving the astrology of global warming.

Er, no. They use dodgy and absurd computer models that can’t predict next Fridays weather accurately. Great! But not enough to bet their own money on I’ll wager. It’s a real test of someone’s sincerity to say “Ok. If you believe this 100%, then I expect no more than what I can get when buying a kitchen appliance. You’ll naturally be happy to give a written guarantee with this?” Go on, ask for one next time. Gee, I bet I know what the answer will be.

“We're just knocked out.
We heard about the sell out.
You gotta get an album out.
You owe it to the people,
We're so happy we can hardly count”. Have a Cigar. Pink Floyd.

Here's the swingin' Minority Senate Report of over 400 scientists that don't agree with the global scam of climate change. Hey, and no Nazi's!

Why not make it 100,000 dead? Cos that would be ridiculous! Nope, 4,000 dead seems reasonable and absurd enough. Pitiful really. We are surrounded by professional boobs, egotists and fakes, all followed by a vast and willing global wave of conformist twerps. Ah, skepticism is evil. Check. Must conform.

Global warming = global socialism. Check.

Why do people believe this crap? No, really. What’s in it for them? They really believe and want to save the world? I mean, over getting laid? I mean, just keep asking why do they believe it? Because of Gore, the MSM or school etc? Why trust them and believe the er, evidence?

Have they done serious research? Few people I’ve met, have either the curiosity, interest, skills or energy to look into most anything. We are kids, largely passively indoctrinated. It’s not rebellious in the slightest to swallow Left junk and standard mass conformity. Rebellion is usually not so er, pre-digested, pre-packaged and such a group activity!

Keep on asking why, and it'll come to a dead end without a reason why they personally believe it. I can think of five authentic reasons. A sense of superiority, fear, conformity, delusion and money. Let me at that tasty gravy and product placement!

Also, it's easier just to agree. People are basically decent and are being manipulated and duped on a massive scale. That's Leftardism.

“Why buy NEW bullshit? Because it’s great for the environment and because we really care!”

Thus from ordinary dupes to celebrities to our own bureaucrat at heart Prime Minister Rudd, they almost invariably want someone else to pay the pooper. [Bureaucrat: An official who is rigidly devoted to the details of administrative procedure.] Paging Mr Rudd!


Jesus, in Marie Claire, various Hollywood intellectuals, are holding up incredibly vain signs admonishing us plebs for not being as superior GW wise as them. Ya gotta read it. Heath Ledger says he cares about the children’s future. Thus he spent years away from his children heavily using drugs like heroin and is now dead.

David Suzuki says he "tries to use less..." Try suicide.

Cate Blanchet says how we are such consumers! Yep, but not always enough of private jet and limousine ferried movie stars and their er, product. When in Melbourne Cate lives frugally in a St. Kilda boarding house. The other tenants, a wino, a psych out patient and a crippled girl all comment how Cate sits in the dark most nights chewing on raw oatmeal.

“I often hear Cate screaming “I gotta save the planet!”

Celebrities appear to get their brains set on mediocre somewhere around High School.

Hey, but we can save 4,000 retirees from dying simply by getting the government to DO more and more, and TAX more and more and SPEND more and more of your money, and REGULATE more and more of your life, and LISTEN to more movie stars, and PAY more and more to academics, consultants and failed politicians! What a surprise!

And at the head of our directionless and empty neo-Socialist Tourets spin addicted government is Kevin the technocrat who has maybe achieved less than my Aunt Doris. Mr Swann, the Western worlds foremost corner store reject Treasurer and Deputy PM Julia Gillard, ex-University Commie and a lawyer.

But don’t worry. The other two dynamos who make up the inner-circle of five are, and I kid you not, two 28 year olds with no clear reason why they are there. Unless one thinks working as some kind of campaign assistant to minor politicians, is what the free world is screaming out for right now. “Chaos”, “emptiness”, “spin” and “indecisive” are four of the words most commonly associated with Prime Minister Fluffy. Move the furniture or move the staff and ya get the same effect. Drag marks on the floor.

What strikes me is, where’s the rebellion of people and especially of the young? It’s beyond belief that young people could ever think of a gerkle like Kevin Rudd, or a fat rich venal doofus like Lear jet Al Gore, or an embarrassing old Leftard diesel bus fraud like David Suzuki and pampered Hollywood hypocrites as heroes. How? Why? When? Er, all so very, very uncool.

I don’t want revive my own youthful unfashions, and when I think of reliving them as if they actually achieved or meant something lasting, I feel claustrophobic, unhealthy and as if I’m going mad.

A very clever pinhead like Ross Garnaut, is not apparently qualified in his alleged area of expertise, the voodoo and soothsaying of absurd climate change fortune telling. Not that qualifications seem to always help.

Here’s a piece on a cognitive bias and logical fallacy soaked Garnaut lecture. Ah, Pascals Wager is just like GW faith in that one must accept GW on faith and do something! Anything! As the consequences of not doing something crazy could be Climate Change Hell!

Here’s another bit of background on Toothy. Sadly, it’s as a commenter said “eco-Fascist cheerleading”, which is the purpose of the site cos, it’s Clive Hamilton, the alleged King of Ethics! But then, enviro hipsters and their academic minions, are capable it seems of every kind of mental gymnastic. Clive says how naturally evil, perverse and inferior are the climate change “denialists!” You know, like er, Holocaust deniers?!

“...The truth is that if any of the skeptics - especially those who do have some claim to expertise in the area , were to undertake a study that cast genuine doubt on the global warming hypothesis and it could pass the tests of professional scrutiny, it would cause a sensation”.

Really? Maybe it’ll be put on the front page of ‘The Age?’ Guess not. Er, Clive baby, the burden of proof is on you. It is not a flaw of the audience that they are not convinced. The natural position of science is skepticism if nothing else.


Clive Hamilton: "In 1995, Garnaut was offered the Chairmanship of a new PNG mining company, Lihir Gold Limited. This large open-cut gold mine generates huge taxes and export revenues for PNG. It is also a serious polluter of the coral reefs and ocean floor around Lihir Island, as mine tailings which contain traces of cyanide and heavy metals are loaded on barges and dumped on the nearby ocean floor...post-processing waste is discharged by pipeline 1.5 kilometres out to sea. In June 2000 there was a cyanide spill at the mine.

Lihir was financed by an Australian Government loan by the Export Finance and Insurance Company, which provided hundreds of millions in finance guarantees. The guarantees were provided after the US Government export credit agency, OPIC, rejected the Lihir project on environmental grounds.

In 1995 Garnaut told the ABC…that the environmental impacts had been "very carefully studied, and the studies have concluded that there won't be detrimental effects on fish life. It's highly technical stuff, and I myself have to rely on expert opinion on that. But the expert opinion is reassuring."

...Garnaut didn't tell ABC listeners...that PNG's environmental standards were far lower than those expected of an Australian mine…a mine so environmentally damaging that BHP was eventually forced to divest itself of the polluter. Garnaut remains the Chair of Lihir Gold…in the top 100 companies by market capitalisation on the ASX.

Garnaut's experience and connections at the intersection of government, trade and mining have proved lucrative beyond the wildest dreams of other academics. By 2000...advising global oil giant Exxon on "fiscal arrangements in the petroleum industry"...sitting on the PNG Sustainable Development Program, the PNG Government body that ended up owning the Ok Tedi mine after BHP washed its hands of it”.

Rather interesting, eh? In other words, he cares man! Ross is a classic member of the super-elites of Australia. He’s very rich, powerful, influential and has as many do, a free and endless media platform on which to spout largely unchallenged as per usual. His words and advice for the plebs, don’t match his actions and history, also as per usual. Even shorter, Ross Garnaut is, like Al Gore, Rudd and Tim Flannery ad nauseum, mostly full of crap. A tragic life of human waste.

Flannery the abstractician, doodles and extrapolates in the way that only an academic and morally vain activist can. Some one once said that “it’s so stupid that only an academic could believe it”.

The glib way he spouts and imagines the reality of economics working to his fashionable cant is truly breath taking. Timbo Flannery: “...the issue is so complex, yet so urgent, that we have no choice but to learn on the job!” Riiight. So you know what you’re talking about now though? Guess not. Source: The Sunday Age July 06 2008.

“Economic modelling” by er, activist Leftard zealots. Hey, it’s worked so well everywhere it’s been tried in the past, so why not?! Good grief. At what point if any, would Flannery an academic and Garnaut, an economist, admit they were out of their depth? Almost never. After all, it ain’t their money where their mouth is. If such noodles had to apply testable Quality Control, they’d maybe grind to a standstill. Wait ten years and then look in wonder when nothing they predict has happened. Not a damn thing. Except for the myriad fiascos and disasters such impractical loons are so good at creating.

Today the heroes of too many people it seems, are the most venal, fashionable and filthy rich establishment bastards one can find. Go figure.

“Everybody else is just green.
Have you seen the chart?
It's a helluva start,
It could be made into a monster,
If we all pull together as a team.

And did we tell you the name of the game, boy?
We call it Riding the Gravy Train”. Have a Cigar. Pink Floyd.

Everybody’s heard about the Burd, or should have.

Sheik Kalihd Yassin having a well earned break from giving a lecture at Werribee Islamic College. Sayeth Sheiken but nut stirred, “The Jews are poisoning the bananas! That’s why I prefer to chew on my own foot and I just lick the rest!”




Now here’s a funny thing that’s as clear as day, especially the heart of darkness and well of evil parts. However vast the currently fashionable Himalaya of disgusting anti-Semitism is, or the repellent bog standard hatred of Israel and all round conspiracy to murder Jews by stealth, for some folks it can never be enough.

No matter how venally Left snivelling, nihilist, stupid and Islamist chummy it is. Nope, I largely hear, read and see the canard that "...isn’t criticism of Israel allowed?” whenever I question said bogus er, criticism. And as if the age-old idiot hatred of the Jewish people has any noble intent. Er, no actually. Innit funny, the lack of ah, "criticism" of any of the 52 Islamic states of varying degrees of suspended Hell?

Yeah, and like my feeble objections are gonna stop the avalanche of lies, and the mountain of hate aimed exclusively at Israel and Jews.

The Logical Fallacy of “balance” is a major Islamist tactic, mate. The Age and the New York Times would happily publish Hitler under a non de plume, if he wrote with er, “balance”, except he’s kind of the Age and NYT’s laughable idea of a right wing Conservative, so no. And anyway, why publish the Fuhrer when both publications have a large stable of more sophisticated and acceptable advocates of the same to draw on? No, really.

There’s stable work to be had at the Age and the NYT’s. Yep, and with real manure!

Faux critiques of Israel are a fraud, the biggest lie of today and have zero decency, because sports, the're about destruction by deception. But some folks just can’t come out and say they want Israel to disappear, and why can’t the Jews stop insisting on surviving? That’s unless you’re a freakish and alleged hero of the Left, a Fatah farter or an Islamist loon.


Paul Johnson with an excellent article in Commentary Magazine on ever growing Arab anti-Semitism [my edit]:

“...if anti-Semitism is a variety of racism, it is a most peculiar variety, with many unique characteristics...it is so peculiar that it deserves to be placed in a quite different category...an intellectual disease...extremely infectious and massively destructive...a disease to which both human individuals and entire human societies are prone...

What strikes the historian surveying anti-Semitism worldwide...is its fundamental irrationality. It seems to make no sense...than malaria or meningitis makes sense. In the whole of history, it is hard to point to a single occasion when a wave of anti-Semitism was provoked by a real Jewish threat, (as opposed to an imaginary one).

In Japan, anti-Semitism was and remains common even though there has never been a Jewish community there of any size. [Neville: Oddly there was a small one apparently.]

Asked to explain why they hate Jews, anti-Semites contradict themselves. Jews are always showing off; they are hermetic and secretive. They will not assimilate; they assimilate only too well. They are too religious; they are too materialistic, and a threat to religion. They are uncultured; they have too much culture.

They avoid manual work; they work too hard. They are miserly; they are ostentatious spenders. They are inveterate capitalists; they are born Communists. And so on...the language of anti-Semitism through the ages is a dictionary of non-sequiturs and antonyms, a thesaurus of illogic and inconsistency...is highly infectious, and can become endemic in certain localities and societies.

...a disease of the mind, it is by no means confined to weak, feeble, or commonplace intellects; as history sadly records, its carriers have included men and women of otherwise powerful and subtle thoughts...it is damaging to reason, and sometimes fatal.

...when anti-Semitism is added in; irrational thinking becomes not only instinctual but systemic. An experienced anti-Semite constantly looks for "evidence" to confirm his idée fixe, and invariably finds it...

...a Marxist, looking for "proof", constantly uncovers events that confirm his diagnosis of how the world works.

Anti-Semitism is self-inflicted, which means that, by an act of will and reason, the infection can he repelled. But this is not easy to do, especially in societies where anti-Semitism has become common or the norm...is also self-destructive...of societies and governments...individuals”. Paul Johnson.


So anti-Semitic creeps are not saying “Gee, you know Israel, if you got some new shoes and a new hairstyle, you’d look great and then we could date!”

Nope, goons mostly work toward the same goals. It’s the end of the Jewish people and the Jewish state, mate, and then onto the same thing for the free Capitalist Democracies of the West. But then, everyone needs a hobby.

In the end, the Age, the NYT’s, the ABC, NPR etc, and the MSM in general, make the world more dangerous for Jews, and that’s a fact.

And with these cheery thoughts in mind, I went to see the courageous and proportionately lonesome Michael Burd, last Tuesday night at Caulfield Campus, as part of the Limmud Oz happening.

Basically, Mike reeled of a list of plain old and new cold facts, all rather easy to verify. And the facts are that for the most part, the MSM, academia, entertainment, the arts and public discourse ad nauseum, are stuffed to the gunnels with the bizarre dominance of Islamist anti-Semites, radical Left fellow travellers and Hamas fans. And quite a few are perversely Jews of the Left and the Left my dear, are natural Islamist bedfellows. Funny, innit?

Yep, I could feel and hear the hostility in the room toward old Mike. It was a cracklin', baby! The last thing the weird advocates of faux criticism want is criticism, of them of course.

Professor Mark Baker has said that "There's no shortage of academics that foam at the mouth at the mere mention of Israel".

Middle-East analyst Ted Lapkin writing in the Australian publication, Quadrant Magazine, said that "Australian Academia is a rogues gallery of Anti –Zionists..."

Steven Crittenden has said that the Australian University is being taken over by Islamist groups.

And er, I notice sports, this is pretty much happening not just a Hell of a lot in the West, but with most any country with much of a Muslim percentage.

Mike spoke how Left wing Jewish groups like AJDS and their members aligned themselves with the Palestinians, Arab and Muslim community to help demonize Israel. And how one can say almost any lie about Jews and the MSM largely never follows it up when it’s debunked. Like the Al Dura fraud, exposed by the French media.

Mike pointed out the Age has staff writers who are members of the Islamic council of Victoria, are Palestinian activists, anti Zionist cartoonists and biased Jerusalem based journalists etc. Why? Oh, “balance”. Check. Got it.

Mike Burd asked “Don’t the Jews who are leading the anti Zionist movement realize that if the Arab/Muslim world succeeds in destroying the Jewish state as we know it, they themselves will become redundant and useless? Are they that naïve and self-destructive?”


Now I’m hip, but even I was surprised at how wide spread anti Zionism is in not just the MSM and Jewish academia, but Universities in general and how very few academics stand up for Israel. The defaults I’m afraid, are more on the Jew hating side.

Al Age features a rotating and hack filled smorgasbord of as per usual Left twerps, smooth to crude Islamist Taqiyaa pushers and perverse self hating Jews. They gab endlessly how Israel, the only successful free democracy in the region, is never good enough, all while Israel is under relentless attack. Now take chuckling Andrew Jaspin. Please!

Previously the editor of the Scottish Sunday Times, where allegedly a journalist said Israel deserved homicide/suicide attacks! And another blames Jews and Mossad for 9/11. Yeah, riiight, obviously a brilliant plan. Then said scribbler added delightfully that the true purpose of bringing down the World Trade Centre was to “bind America and Jews in blood”. Ugh.

The amazing list of pro Hamas, pro-Palestinian anti-Zionist Left midget people, who are given a major and permanent mainstream media voice, is rather long. Anti-Zionist, Jew hater or Nazi? Take your pick of titles. What’s the diff?

As Mike showed, many Left wing Jews are insanely more sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians than their fellow Jews.

Louise Adler’s greatest wish is apparently to publish David slice ‘em Hicks. While the out going Natasha Stott Despoja, unbelievably took Hick the sick prick as a companion and guest to the formal end of the Democrats dinner and fire sale!

“Sale! All our ethical judgement must go!”

“Hicks last night made his first public appearance since being released from jail in December, stepping out for drinks with departing Democrats senator Natasha Stott Despoja.

With his father, Terry, at his side, relaxed Hicks sipped beer and chatted freely with guests at an Adelaide function to mark Ms Stott Despoja's retirement from the Senate. The confessed terrorism supporter left the fashionable Universal Wine Bar”. The Australian July 01 2008.

Ah, and people unfairly call such geeks Chardonnay Socialists. Sometimes they sip beer!

Er, that’s David Hicks the freakishly dull moronic bogan, liar and allegedly innocently trained Islamist terrorist, trained to kill men, women and children. Not to be confused with Saint Hicks who saved millions of blind children.

Columnist, sometimes guest and favourite reference point of the ABC’s Phil Adams, is the relentlessly bogus and logical fallacy addicted Robert Fisk, whose name is now a pejorative ‘to Fisk’, meaning to debunk the logical fallacy of largely Leftist junk. Think of another of Adams guests of the “I agree completely, Phil!” stripe, like Bruce Shapiro, but without the charm. Now I used to like Phil’s radio show a lot. But sadly, not anymore, chum.

“Perceived victims are the new heroes. Have been since Socialists found it a neat way to manipulate the masses. Only they get to say who the victims are and how they are to be recompensed. It takes a real conspiracy to do that to a population in so short a time”. GrahamF of Melbourne .

“Natasha Stott Despoja became increasingly loony in her political life the closer she, and the Democrats, came to their inevitable doom. But what fun it was to ‘spit in the eye’ of boringly middle-class and complacent Australia by courageously feting David Hicks, who sought the murder of fellow Australians, as a hero. I wonder what Don Chipp would have though of it all? I’m sure Meg Lees isn’t surprised". Spencer de Vere of Brisbane.

“Don’t you talk about Natasha that way! I love her and one day we will be married and live together in a tree, or maybe a trendy Adelaide apartment! I’ll leave the decision up to her, because she’s good with things like that and I won’t hear another word against her, so just shut up, shut up, shut up!” martinX. Via Andrew Bolt.

As I said, the list is soooooooooo long! Hey, there’s the frothing beyond belief hyperbole and pamphlet spouting Leftist John Pilger. It’s always 1972 for John and he’s forever "giving it to the man! With the power! Let’s burn down the Deans office!" Once he did brave work exposing the atrocities of Indonesia in East Timor, and the venality of our governments on same. What went wrong? Too many Che the child killer Guevara pills?

Peter Rogers, laughter cadet and apparently some kinda fellow traveller of Hamas and Islamic Jihad. Tubular! Like, rad dude! Dr Phillip Mendes. Love him! Who wouldn’t? Julian Burnside. Fantastic! Like, totally! Get out the water crackers and cheese! A real sweetheart is Robert Richter QC, and someone whom I could never imagine as say, a tap dancer.

My Aunt Doris is always asking me, "Colonel, where can I find a premiere anti-Zionist Jew?”

Colonel Neville: "Beats me Aunty, as I’m way too small to know. And I can’t blow raspberries with these blow fly lips".

Check and match.

There's always, always, the hilariously neurotic Michael Leunig. He’s a “National Living Treasure” ya know? Thus half buried in dirt and the appearance of a 3: AM wino. The comfy one track, out of whack mind of Bruce Petty is more tangled than his string drawings. And dear Professor Andrew Vincent, [sigh!] is seemingly another tenured and Left anti-Zionist. What a darling! Er, no.

Once Was Funny: The Michael Leunig Story.

"Look there's Mr Curly! No, it's an evil American. Look! It's a duck! Er, no, it's apparently an evil Jew attacking a saintly Hamas killer and for no good reason".

Yes, once was sane. Many a regularly published boob seems to pretty much think terrorist's have some kind of er, legitimacy and Israel is a big poopy mistake. And Israel is the real cause of trouble for all the poor little vicious, dysfunctional theocratic totalitarian dictatorships that surround it.

Funny, they never say the same thing about Islamic states?

Radical Leftist misfits like Michael Butterball Glanz, the S11 rioter, get an unquestioned voice in the MSM echo chamber of bankrupt moral equivalence.

Anti-Zionist Left loon Antony Loewenstein is called on regularly as an 'authentic’ Israeli mind! Riiight, sure he is. And I’m the go to guy for Shirley Temple impressions. Apparently he’s been to Israel only a little more than my Aunt Doris, preferring to apparently spend his time on the Arab West Bank. Nuance.

‘Da Burd’ gave some rather revealing insights to put it mildly, into Lowenstein’s trip to Israel via Ronald Green, Lowy’s cousin. He described how obsessed Lowenstein was to vilify Israel, and how Lowy baby, never really revealed his true purpose.

Burd asked how could so many prominent dissident Jews from the IAJV, [Independent Australian Jewish Voices] could still have their names associated with Loewenstein and his partner Peter Slezak from the Uni of NSW, when Lowy argues Israel should not be a Jewish state and should be part of the Arab world. And when Loewenstein is so closely aligned with Palestinian lobby group Australians for Palestine?

“Enough with the Holocaust and alleged Palestinian terrorism”. Antony Loewenstein.

Nice. Nuance. Or why a platform for Aimin Saikal, the pineapple faced Islamist? Or Waleed Aly, the reasonable and smooth face of Islamic apologia and blame shifter to the “white” West? And both with some perhaps rather um, ‘unpleasant’ links on their sites…

Dig, Mahir Mugrahbi. No, really. What a guy.

"No way, man! He’s not a manipulative and deceptive Islamist kinda guy! He used to mow our lawn!"

Then there’s Tony Walker, the Australian Financial Review’s resident anti-Zionist, or so it seems, eh? But what do I know? With his two biography’s of Yasser Arafat and why not, eh?! Professor Evan Jones is likewise, a seeming variation.

So untouchable and unreachable and never really grilled about a damn thing, eh? Just boob on unchallenged in a mostly closed MSM shop. Still, it’s a larf.

Everything Mike said is the way things are folks, and he was merely giving credit where credit is due to the tip of the old cliché. It’s criminal and creepy really, the state of our laughably no public access discourse. Very certain sections of our society have the controlling voice.

My favourite bizarro story was of the insane Sheik Kalidh Yassin, who was invited here to talk to children. He then said to the kiddies some kind of variation on “…the Jews are poisoning the bananas!” Sure, he may have said it in a good way!

And he was invited back. And they say fruit is good for ya. But first a typical semi-dhimmi ABC interview by John Cleary, with the Shitbag Sheik. Even while Junior Jihad spells out what Islam factually means, little seems to register with clueless Cleary.

From Tim Blair:

“Don't even ask what they do to the apples.

You learn all sorts of interesting things at Werribee Islamic College: The teacher could not believe what he overheard. The “visiting” imam was launching into a tirade against the Jews and Americans that bordered on the ludicrous.

But then came the clincher, he recalled. “The imam told the students that the Jews were putting poison in the bananas and they should not eat them."

Poisoned Bananas College receives about $3 million per year from state and federal funds, reports The Age. Aside from instruction in the fruit-tampering ways of those wily Jews, students acquire healthy values:

“...what she discovered in the school library. An image of Christ in a book on comparative religion had been defaced. When she asked students to explain, they told her that another teacher, a devout Muslim, had asked them to demonstrate that Islam was the one true faith by striking the picture with sharpened pencils".

"They told me they had been made to line up and one by one stab the picture...”

“...[the] teacher, who was dismissed from the school because she was "over qualified", is now employed at a Christian faith-based school. She says she has no regrets about leaving. "The atmosphere at the school was unhealthy," she said. "When you asked children to write about their favorite hero, they nearly always wrote about Osama bin Laden." Via Tim Blair and the Age!

In the end, you can go to a lot of most anywhere and say stupid anti-Semitic cliché’s and few say much or they agree. It’s accepted much as propaganda is meant to be. Surprisingly few even understand what anti-Semitism is or means. It means that whatever happens to the Jews and Israel, will happen to us eventually. It’s happening already, via the endlessly problematic facts of the dominant ideology of the Left and Islamism combined.

If anyone can compile a good sized list of well known pro-Israel voices in the MSM, I’d love to see it.

Where are they, the clear, strong and effective? And not just for Israel, but pro-empirical Conservatism in general? You may need a map to find such a legend, but then it is a largely lost treasure, innit?

Derek and Clive discuss ethics.

Pictured centre is the head of the Greenpeace National Socialist Environmental Party, Adolf Hitler Junior, giving a speech titled "Today, total control ov zer public opinion, tomorrow, zer verld!"




“We no longer debate people who don’t accept the scientific reality of anthropogenic climate change”. Greenpeace.


Clive: “Ladies and gentleman, a warm welcome for the star of 'I Was a Teenage Communist', it's the eternal ABC government employee and easily frightened, Phillip Adams! Oh come on Phil, say something urbane, witty and entirely bogus. Come on, say it”

Derek: “Oh thank you Clive. I’d like to do a little song about taxpayer funded and unchallenged jobs for life…”

Clive: “Take it away! Ladies and gentleman a big round of applause for the world’s oldest beatnik, Phil the shill!”

Derek [on piano]: “Here’s a little number called ABC.

A B C, mostly Left ideology.
As simple as a Left luvvie.
All P C, so phony.
Baby, ya want to scream…”

Clive: “Excellent. Really outstanding. Derek, did you know that the ABC are thinking of ways to spruce things up a bit with a novel and fresh approach, by doing something they’ve never done before?”

Derek: “The ABC is going to find someone even more incredibly boring, predictable, screwy and stale to replace Phillip Adams?”

Clive: “An enormous challenge, but no. The board got together in their taxpayer funded inner sanctum, and some wag proposed introducing the rather cutting edge idea of ethics. A radical idea, I grant you. There was a fear with this, that a public broadcaster could inadvertently broadcast the actual opinions of the public, which could lead to anarchy or even worse, uncontrolled freedom of speech”.

Derek [on piano]: “Come on Aunty’s just a load of shit.
Come on and bore me just a little bit.
I'm gonna teach you how to sling it out!
Come on, come on, come on, let me tell you what it's all about!
Preaching, lying, the arthritic!

‘Ere Clive, talking about the cutting edge. I heard that Ramona Koval on the book show. A real turn up for the books it was too. No. Ramona said you are what you read and she was bleeding right! Apparently Noam Chomsky is not getting enough exposure on the Left, and Ramona is going to er, help out. She can help me out with my Chompsky, if she likes!”

Clive: “Yes, the ABC has always been a risk taker. Only last week they had a John Pilger free week”.

Derek: “I heard they’ve stopped polishing the statues of Al Gore, Tim Flannery and Stalin in the foyer?”

Clive: “Derek, these are ugly rumours spread by the ungrateful people who don’t realise how well the ABC represents the average pleb, by employing smug, conceited, beyond belief untouchable University educated dullards, virtually tenured for life”.

Derek: “Ungrateful masses! Fuck ‘em all!”

Clive: “And at the ABC, SBS et al, they largely do. Noam Chomsky promoted on the ABC? There’s your ethics right there, Derek! Chumpsky wrote a book saying how wonderful the Khmer Rouge and Pol Pot were. If anything, the Khmer Rouge were always at the cutting edge of Leftist ideology, hence the mass torture and executions.

And now the Chumper works almost exclusively in the high ethical standards of conspiracy theory. His current monument to the ethical, is in saying that 9/11 was an inside job directed by George Bush. And he’s achieved it all sans any empirical evidence that he’s willing to present to a court. Isn’t it nice of Ramona to give such a great guy a taxpayer funded helping hand?”

Derek: “She’s a saint and a hero of the Cambodian people!”

Clive: “Ethics, Derek, that's ethics. Apparently our own Clive Hamilton is also big on ethics. According to Andrew Bolt, Hamilton has been made Professor of Public Ethics at Charles Sturt University.

Derek: “Bolt gives me the horn! Funny though, Ramona doesn’t”.

Clive: “Yes, broadcasting is filled with the limp making. Old Hammy the hamster said and I quote, “Over the last 20 or 30 years . . . academics have been less willing to engage in public debate”. Meaning agree totally with a Leftard.

Later Lady Clive Hamilton said "I will not be contributing any further pieces to the site, [Online Opinion] because it has been captured by climate change denialists”. You know the denialists? There are the people who insist on valuing their democratic and scientific right to dissent from the howling and conformist mob. Thus, ordinary men and women can be discredited sans proof by equating them irrationally with Nazis.

In this way, you no longer have to prove anything and are untouchable and unreachable and probably making a lovely pile of cash out of the worlds biggest scam and gravy train in history. But that’s global socialism , er global warming for you”.

Derek: “Fucking staring into a glow ball warming, more like it”.

Clive: “Ham the man then said “I do not presume to engage in arguments about climate science because I do not have the expertise to do so without making a fool of myself.”

Derek: “Nuance. Check”.

Clive: “Of course. You are obviously hip to the scene, Derek”.

Derek: “I’m so hip, it fucking hurts!”

Clive: “Yes, and as Andy said in his lovely piece on the Hamilton:

“...as with other such preachers, this didn’t stop him, [Hamilton] from vilifying the “denialists” who disagreed with him as “loopy and deceptive”, the sort who’d accuse “the Royal Family (of) being in cahoots with global Jewry”.

Derek: “What if some of the skeptics are Jewish, as many scientists and intellectuals are? Isn’t that kind of absurdly and bizarrely outrageous?”

Clive: “This is probably part of the job description of a Professor of Ethics today, Derek.

Derek: “And of course he can name some of these er, “denialists” and link them to a belief in such a conspiracy?”

Clive: “Er, apparently not, Derek. It appears that Logical fallacy, the entirely bogus and the hatefully disingenuous are the Hambone’s thang, Derek”.

Derek: “Also, there’s also a lot of arseholes about”.

Clive: “Exactly, Derek. But there’s only so many vacancies at the ABC”.

Derek [on piano]: “Your education ain't complete!
Tea, tea, teacher's gonna show you!”

Clive: “Phil’s gonna bore you!”

Derek: “How to get some A! Nya, nya, nya, nyaaaaaagh!”

Clive: “I’d like to say good night on behalf of myself and patronizin' Punxsutawny Phil! Good night”.

Derek and Clive tackle a conundrum.

Clive: "From beginning to end, PC Left Liberalism is one big 'effing suicidal contradiction, Derek. It's such a very old load of unbelievably back dated bollocks, that most Leftards have to take enormous amounts of bleeding drugs to not only understand any of it, which can't be done, but to believe a single shred of it. Thus their greatest wish is to convince every dissenter by force, via state controlled conformity, intimidation and violence.

Such phony baloney and moral vanity driven fraud, can only be swallowed whole, if like a drug addicted whore in a toilet, you disguise the true flavour of morally and rationally going down, with ample helpings of cough syrup. This dear Derek, is the true face of Left Liberal smiley faced Fascism".

Derek: "They're all arseholes!"

Clive: "Exactly, Derek".




Derek [on piano]: “Oh, John Pilger came into the lav to film his latest doc. ‘E said I need more bleeding funding, so can I suck your...”

Clive: “It’s a funny coincidence that you should mention John Pilchard, the avid fan of all things Marxist and thus deemed er, “progressive” Derek, because I never think of him. A progressive is someone who develops ever more acceptable versions of the exact same thing by simply changing the name.

Thus the religion that is trying to kill us all and invariably is offended or threatens violence at any criticism of their murderous antics, is a religion of er, peace. And the faith that is a major cornerstone of what has given us the enormous freedom and prosperity of Capitalist Democracy, free speech, women's rights, children's rights and gay rights via the free flow of ideas and innovation is called er, intolerant.

Thus as they say at the peoples cube, truth telling is now hate speech and hate speech = sensitivity training. Targeting terrorists = indiscriminate murder of civilians, indiscriminate murder of civilians = resistance to imperialism.

Destruction of the family = social progress. Clinical paranoia = outstanding film making. Free country = oppressive regime, oppressive regime = workers' paradise. Electoral process = failing democracy, socialist dictatorship = will of the people. Export of capitalist democracy = imperialist war for oil, export of communist revolution = true democracy.

Terrorists = freedom fighters, freedom fighters = imperialist occupiers, rapists and murderers. Rambling communist thug = idealistic romantic dreamer, hard-working productive individual = corporate fascist. Lowering standards = raising awareness, degeneracy = striving urban culture, and so on ad nauseum, Derek”.

Derek: “What if I said comfortable, unchallenged, phony, Leftard radical ar…?”

Clive: “Pilchard!”

Derek: “Oh, George Negus came into the bog to interview Hamas, they had a lot of inane laughs and George Needless kissed some a...”

Clive: “Very good. You’ve finished. Now don’t call us, and we’ll never call you. Now I don’t know if you’ve ever noticed the latest conundrum with the average dhimmie PC Leftard Liberal arsehole prick vomit bags mentality, when it comes to the utter joy and light of Islamic terror, Derek. As you know, I would never be so un-PC as to call a thing exactly what it is. No, circular wanking and denial is the way to go. Anyway Derek, have you had any contact with the people of whom I speak?”

Derek: “You mean your bog standard apologist and anti-Semitic loons of the Left? All the fucking time, mate! They're always in my fucking bog! Always raving about "I need more government funding! More taxpayer gravy! Where are my bulging cheques from the Melbourne Age and the New York Times? Please cut my fucking head off cos’ I love it!”

Clive: “Exactly. There’s a curious contradiction that shows that their entire allegedly tolerant position regards Islam is an irresponsible fraud”.

Derek: “They’re all full of shit, mate!”

Clive: “Positively bursting. Well, this it how it works. Anyone who says they are a Muslim is ipso facto a Muslim and their faith, Islam is untouchable by mirth or critique of any kind by us Infidels and filthy Kafirs, except in the er, positive”.

Derek: “I love the light hearted cheer and the good will to all, the most!”

Clive: “Who doesn’t? And the screaming. Then as if by magic, the same people who we must be ever vigilant never to offend, can be deemed as “not real Muslims” by the same Left pricks who say they will then arrest you for saying something they don't like or on behalf of Muslims everywhere, for something they don’t like, from only a moment before. This is the pure joy of Left liberal fascism today, Derek”.

Derek: “Bloody ‘ell! It’s all a little fucking neurotic and complicated innit? What kind of things offend many Muslims around the world then, Clive?”

Clive: “The things that offend many Muslims around the world today Derek, can be narrowed down to everything and nothing”.

Derek: “Lovely. Er, how can a Muslim go instantly from being a Muslim, to not being a "real" Muslim, Clive?”

Clive: “It’s surprisingly easy and there in lies the conundrum of the PC loser, as it were. A Muslim just has to act appallingly or kill someone and they are no longer a Muslim. At least until they stop killing and start complaining about people screaming as they're beheaded. And oddly, neither terrifying behaviour nor murder is always seen as bad, per se. There are many er, "conditions" that can apply at any time to the religion of peace or else, but not really for anyone else. And they can change back again without any notice whatsoever too.

Thus, it is technically impossible for a Muslim to ever set off a bomb, behead or murder someone, because..."

Derek: "They're naturally not real Muslims!"

Clive: " Exactly, Derek. So even if you don't know you're offending Islam by your mere Infidel or Jewish existence, you probably are.

Thus what happens is, that even though someone has been a Muslim all their life, and their entire family is Muslim going back generation after generation, and they go to the Mosque, they live in a Muslim community or state, they read the Koran, they dress and look like Muslims, they speak and eat like a Muslim and they say they are Muslims and may want to spread Islam globally by any means, exactly as Mohammad and the Koran clearly proscribes, no, no.

The moment one cuts off a head and sets off a bomb, hey presto! The Western media, academia, governments, church leaders, celebrities and pop stars all decree as one “...but they are not real Muslims!” Amazingly, these people are yet to say this on a street corner in say Tehran, Riyadh or Cairo”.

Derek: “Why not, Clive?”

Clive: “Because many of the local Muslims would be real Muslims only up to a certain point. And I believe that exact point would be where they become not real Muslims as if by magic, and cut the real Infidels heads off”.

Derek: “That's a real puzzler, Clive! So, I guess Taoists, Hindu’s and Christians are not real whenever they do anything naughty then, too?”

Clive: “Oddly no. Taoists, Hindu’s and your cargo cultists, don’t really fit into the current Left PC paradigm, so are largely invisible, though Christians do fit nicely. Just remember, when a Christian does something bad, they are always a real Christian, unless they do something good. Then they don’t exist. Yes, it’s a real conundrum, as you say”.

Derek: “Unless the conundrum cuts the heads off Christian school girls in Thailand because they're Christians and not Muslims, Clive?”

Clive: “Nope, such an orgy or relentless violence can be and is simply ignored. Remember they’re not real Muslims who have murdered over 150,000 people in Northern no-go zones of Thailand over the last twenty years”.

Derek: “Who did it then?”

Clive: “Oh, random and anonymous people who shall remain nameless, even though they look, sound, act, walk, talk and appear exactly like Muslims. It could have been Hawaiian Anglicans or animists from Toronto. Nobody knows, Derek, nobody knows.

Even though not real Muslim Jihadist groups, have repeatedly declared it was them and they want to kill all non-believers. This is a mere incredible coincidence spread over decades. According to our elitist betters, its hate speech churned up by Asian journalists reporting the empirical facts. Facts are no excuse for speaking the truth, Derek. So remember, there are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world, but none of them are doing any of the mountains of atrocity you can see everyday”.

Derek: “Who is?”

Clive: “Someone else, Derek, it’s always someone else. And it pays to remember that. Or else”.

Derek [on piano]: “Oh, Steve Bracks came into my room and sat upon me bed. He said I’ve passed a fucking anti-free speech law and now you’ll end up dead, oy!”

Clive: “Bravo! All together now! Left Fascism is always for our own good! Now once more without the music and lyrics!”






[Dearsports: here's over 350 five star reviews for Mark Steyn's great empirical paperback opus, America Alone: the end of the world as we know it. A returning best seller for two years running! I should be so lucky! Dig.]

2020 Myopia.

"DO EVERYTHING I SAY AND I'LL STILL SHOOT YOU! VIVA LA 2020 RUDD/OBAMA/BROWN REVOLUTION!"

It's the hero of every Leftard, Che the child killer Guevara! Get the t-shirt and poster! This is the zero standard of Quality Control in action that Left illiberal loons apply to their choice of er, people to look up to.

Che was a narcissistic control freak coward and utter impractical failure at everything and loved to shoot 12 year old boys in the head. Hey, but as long as he looked good and could deliver a few insane and useless lines of bullshit, he's deemed somehow a great example of er, something! Riiight. Communist Fascism = collective freedom via Hollywood celebrity. Got it. Graphic via Che-Mart.




Dear sports, last week I went to a Limmud Oz celebration of Jewish culture thang, where I saw a new to me speaker, and now a favourite, Michael Burd. Mike spoke regards the harsh facts of the overwhelming dominance of Left neo-socialist anti-Semitism and Islamist Taqiyaa pushers in our largely laughable, biased, phony and creepy media, academia and entertainment etc. It’s horribly true and thus a drag.

That was after I did some research on the overwhelming infiltration of the Saudis in almost all levels of Australian society, business, academia and government.

Naturally, I had a million laughs with that too.

And then good old Andrew Bolt quotes the barely repackaged Communist Manifesto that was the venal, insufferable elites and celebrities at the inane 2020 Summit, in all their pinheaded mediocrity, egocentric conceit and fake "for da peeple!" posturing. To put it mildly, these people are indulged, self-indulgent narcissistic pinhead control freaks. But the Left was ever thus, being a largely often middle-class manipulation hobby and pursuit.

What these bastards recommend for the rest of us, but not for themselves as per usual, is beyond belief. If these are the “elite” and “the best and brightest”, er, excuse me if I just fucking spew first.

"The people I distrust most are those who want to improve our lives but have only one course of action". Frank Herbert.

Kate Blanchet and Hugh Jackman are actors at best, not the writers of the Declaration of Independence. Their opinions and those of the rest of the ah, 2020celebrity, media and academic jerk-offs are to put it mildly, mere bog standard Leftards with all the nuance, depth, maturity and understanding of objective reality of any student union crisis meeting.

“Yeah! Let’s make all the people do what we want and we can save the world that way! But first, I have to catch my first class flight back to Bel Air!”

Oh, that's right. Maybe the profoundly deep Hugh and Kate saw what was goin' down man, and raised their voices passionately saying "Wait! This is getting out of hand! It's all limousine Left Liberal collectivist power trip wanking! This attacks the very foundations of what our democratic freedoms mean. The most basic and precious principle, is the freedom and value of the individual above all else. Especially aginst the conformist mob. Stop!..." Er, no. Maybe I missed it.

The whole 2020 wankfest came down to the rotten and absurd Socialist canard that the government should control as much as possible and do more of everything to us and ASAP, and then blah, blah, woof, woof...Er, but none of this will really apply to the rich and powerful, will it? Oh yeah, shorter showers. Whatever.

Cate Blanchet: "I am willing Comrades, to accept ten sacks of fertiliser and a glorious peoples tractor as payment for my next Imperialist American blockbuster!"

I tell ya. We are all doomed via a freakish joining of Leftard Socialist radical enviro-control freaks and their anti-American racist bigotry, anti-Semitism and their myriad Islamist pals. Sure there’s a negative side too. They will kill us all in the end. These geeks are exactly as roundly described by Jonah Goldberg in his profoundly researched book of 2007 called [Left] Liberal Fascism.

Do you know that the British authorities installed their first CCTV surveillance cameras in 1984? They now have millions of ‘em. And just recently they added, and I kid you not, loud speakers in the street. No, really. Do something wrong and someone will speak to you from on high...

Its Orwell Hell is it not? And also just like in the book 1984, the 2020 Summiteers want their smiley faced Fascism to include enforced exercise, for our own good, right? Check. Gotcha.

Now here is just a small taste via journalist and author Andrew Bolt, of what our alleged betters, [cos’ they’re rich!] would like to do to us, and all this fascistic crap was hosted by our ah, Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd! Why does this give me no ah, confidence?

Andy calls it a “Mein Kampf for meddlers”. Great and appallingly true, eh?

From Bolts cool piece called Return of the Wowser in the Melbourne Herald Sun for July 02 2008. . Wowser means an obsessive killjoy of the puritan stripe.

“We don’t realise how insidious this individualism is,” chorused our “best and brightest”.

“Individuality trumps community at every turn” when we really “need to move from individualism to community focus”.

Even what people eat should be seen as a decision best made not just by individual diners, but with “the emphasis on collective responsibility”.

Of course, some party pooper at Rudd’s summit must have coughed nervously, because the report goes on: “A view was put forward that this type of approach to policy and program implementation would risk the notion of a ‘nanny state’ and over restriction of behaviour...”

But damn it: “It was felt...that health promotion must not succumb to these pressures.”

Why not is not explained. It is enough that our “best and brightest” disapprove of what you do. So, having given themselves licence even to dash the chips from your mouth and the slurpee from your hand, off they go, thinking up fresh ways to bully you into living the life of their jackbooted dreams.

“educating the ‘white’ population on indigenous culture”.

Making people suffer is actually good: “Cities should become car-unfriendly.”

Making them go without is the whole idea: “Don’t just buy green, buy less.”

And having to force them to obey is no problem: “We need . . . accountability mechanisms to reduce their consumption”, plus “levers” such as “taxation, incentives (positive and negative) and regulation”. You can hear them drooling over that, no?

Here are bullies who dream of interfering even with your right to buy musical instruments, demanding we “move from buying to hiring”, and adding: “Examples are pianos...” Pianos, but not didgeridoos, of course.

It’s hard to believe our allegedly finest minds could still think like this not two decades after the fall of the Berlin Wall.

Somehow, these are people who must have read George Orwell’s grim 1984 as not a warning but an inspiration. When Orwell wrote of his poor hero being forced “to join in compulsory exercises following the instructions given by a woman from the telescreen”, our intelligentsia must have thought: “Great idea! Let’s tell Rudd!” Andrew Bolt.


So to cheer myself up I was reading a post at Forthardknox, on the forty-five goals of Communism, and here they are. Sadly, little cheer, just the harsh facts that most if not all these goals have been over achieved or need just a little more adjustment. Meaning they don’t have the mass arrests and firing squads yet.

Congressman Albert S. Herlong, was a Democrat and the man who tabled these shocking modus operandi a la Commie, [via such front organisations as the ACLU, founded by two Communists] They don’t make Commie exposing Democrats like that anymore. But then most things are almost in place now, eh? And saying anything serious about Communism now is so gauche! Even while Cuba, North Korea and Cuba etc, still oppress, beggar, torture and oppress millions of human beings.

"Oh, how can you mention something so unimportant and unfashionable!"

From Forthardknox:


“On Jan. 10, 1963, Congressman Albert S. Herlong Jr. of Florida read a list of 45 Communist goals into the Congressional Record".

1. U.S. should accept coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. should be willing to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament by the U.S. would be a demonstration of “moral strength.”

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extend long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China and admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the Germany question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the U.S. has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces.

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the U.S.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions, by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for Socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations that are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book review assignments, editorial writing, and policy-making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV & motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all form of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings,” substituting shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. ”Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural and healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity, which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the grounds that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state”.

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American founding fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of “the big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture – education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures, which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioural problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand or treat.

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special interest groups should rise up and make a “united force” to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally Reservation so the U.S. cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike".


Well sports, all totalitarian monsters first disarm the populace.

"Dictators agree: Gun Control Works!" Done. Check.

Then control the MSM for Leftist fascist propaganda. Done. Check. Then remove the freedom of speech and artistic expression. Approved artists only should receive government funding, Comrades! Done. Check. Destroy economic freedoms. A work in progress, Chief! Then it’s on to the confiscation of private property, restrictions of movement, then the glorious destruction of our culture and society.

And finally the pedagogy of the wall! Fire! As I have said many times, environmentalism is a mere pretext for total control via other means. It’s NO coincidence that the enviro-freak movement is full of extremist Leftards, hungry for taxpayer provided funding to support their goals and ideology. If you follow the ‘logic’, it can only end in mass murder. No, really.

Many leading environmental figures have stated repeatedly and clearly, that people are a “cancer” and they want to murder “cull” as many as possible. All Left ideas are discredited, without apology, if you simply wait long enough. Sadly, the waiting usually involves the death of millions of people. And then the Left intelligentia just repackage it again, and your children bring it back as homework.

[The fraud of] Global Warming = Global Socialism.