A planet where apes evolved from men? There’s got to be an answer.

In Planet Of The Apes, Chuck famously finds Bin Laden's cave and forces Osama down to the beach, where the shit of the desert promptly becomes enraged at the sight of Nova in a rag bikini.

"Infidel blasphemer!" yells the old bladder in a bag, fraud, pervert and weirdy beardy. In Beneath the Planet Of The Islamists, er, Apes, Chuck shoots Iran's President Armachimphead dead, as the President of Hell on Earth grovels pantless, while worshipping The Holy War Bomb. It's a classic! "You bloody baboon!" says Chuck in the final scene.





"There's got to be an answer". And there is an answer. The answer is Islam, Communism and PC neo-Marxist Left Liberalism. Put ‘em all together and whatta ya got? An upside down Monkey Planet Madhouse. Your standard Planet Of The Apes. Chuck was right and not just about Dr Zaius.

“You dirty...I oughta kill you right now”. Taylor.

“It still doesn’t give me the why. A planet where apes evolved from men? There’s got to be an answer”. Taylor.

“Don’t look for it Taylor, you may not like what you find”. Dr Zaius.

Hey yeah, now dig. The Taliban and Hamas ad nauseum are not anomalies of Islam. No siree. They ARE Islam. Just like the SS were Nazism and Stalin was and still is the natural and logical high point of totalitarian Communism.

Thus the rag headed freaks of the nihilist child torturing rapist Taliban, murder one of Afghanistan’s top female Senior Police Officer’s because she was a woman, and especially because she was a modern woman and the head of the Department of Crimes Against Women.

"We killed Malalai Kakar," Yousuf Ahmadi told the AFP news agency. "She was our target, and we successfully eliminated our target."

"Anyone who calls themselves Taliban and Hamas et al, should be dead". The Colonel Neville Doctrine.


“Of course there's room for Hamas!” Tony two tone Blair in answer to whether there’s room for Hamas in negotiations for and within a two state final solution. Oops, not officially final yet! Nope, though Sharia Creep is making great progress in Britain.

Come on. Tony the official asshat wearer won’t be put to task by anyone in power or the MSM on his ah, how can I put this? Wilful and deliberate naïve contempt for reality regards Israel and the Jewish people, which makes Tony Blair a dangerous dhimmi bastard and well, an enemy of Israel, now don’t it?

But dig, swingin’ hepcats. Tony’s sucking successor, the beyond belief Gordon Brown gave this hard to believe speech to the ah, nation apparently wishing all Britain well on the eve of St. Crispin’s...opps, sorry no. Wishing all of Britain well on ah, er, gee, Ramadan! No, really.

Which reminds me of an old medieval joke via The Goodies. A Norman goes into a tavern and says “Do you serve sucking pig?” And the owner says “Mate, we serve sucking anybody!” Boom tish!

And here are wonderful Muslims and blacks in the UK grooming British children for prostitution.


In the Middle-East they apparently don’t design, develop or manufacture a single car but they have er, plans for it. Now places in Africa make cars. Much of Asia makes cars, but in Saudi Arabia where a lot of oil apparently comes from, they prefer to ban women from driving the cars they’ll never be able to create themselves. But they do love to put bombs in ‘em and then detonate at girls schools.

Oh yeah, in Britain they love to drive around raving just like that pervert child rapist Mohammad. Yes, they love driving a car made in Japan while screaming through a microphone made in Japan and putting it out on the Internet developed by Americans, on a computer chip and software developed by Jews from Israel and America. Hmmmm. Though I believe the bed sheet daywear and the filth of the Krazy Koran come exclusively from the creative types in Sandland.

It’s funny innit? The enemy within of hideous Islamists is not seriously or honestly discussed by our authorities and most of our MSM except to excuse, cover, support, fund and lie for them. A riot, no? In France, Norway, Britain and Hell, most everywhere they have any proportion of Muslims, it's a riot every night.

“Cornelius was right Doctor. He proved it, Man was here first. You owe him your science your culture, whatever civilisation you’ve got”. Taylor.

And here are the awesome facts of American economic superiority and the superior free culture that can create this in the first place.


Now here’s something that encapsulates nearly everything you need to know about many a Left Liberal and radical and their resurgent neo-Marxism via decades of indoctrination.

They will kids, most often champion someone who has never achieved anything proven. Unless its got that selfish thing, eh? They will side with evil and the complete opposite of what was originally said, and that which invariably ends in total failure. As a YouTube commenter said of Sean Penn's love affair with Chavez, this is known as "making the world a better place".

Anyone productive and with something proven and wanted by other people which actually does make the world a better place, is by the mere fact of their achievements, either ignored or reviled usually by default. You can prove this with a simple formula I call the Reagan/Che Inversion.

This is where the greater the empirical achievements of Reagan are, the greater the hatred of Ronnie and the greater the worshipping of Che the child killers image by a Leftard.

Yep, old Ron did indeed make some unbelievably flawed, wrong headed to plain clueless and appalling decisions. Not to the level of Jimmy Saudi whore and anti-Semite give global Iranian Jihad a hand farter Carter, or Bill spray it loud and run away from Jihad facts and force banks to finance home loans to welfare recipients Clinton. Yep, venal fraud is largely for heroes of the Left Liberal like the Billy, the Jimmy and Democratic Senator Byrd, the semi ex-KKK member.

Sadly, the Gipper's massive public, private and personal achievements are mostly ignored, dismissed and largely unknown. For Carter and Clinton, their utter failure at virtually everything but evil and perjury, are held up as great and noble achievements. Go figure.

Excluding Castro and the parasitical vampire members of Fidel's Gangster Fiefdom, any international criminal syndicate members and celebrities, or the lucky Cubans who have made it to Miami, the actual number of people made free, prosperous and happy by Che the child killer Guevara equals exactly...zero.

The number of people made free and able to be prosperous and happy by Ronald Reagan, being one of the few public figures to recognise and loudly state the empirical and inherent evil of Communism, and then act accordingly in part by bankrupting the Soviet Empire in an arms race, is around one billion people.

The number of people including young unarmed boys shot in the head by Che the child murdering sadist, and men and women personally beaten to death with a baseball bat by Che , raped, tortured in Che’s self designed concentration camps and shot by personal firing squad by Che is in the hundreds to thousands.

The number of people personally saved by Ronald Reagan the life guard and champion athlete is around seventy.

The number of things said by Che that were not vacuous platitudes, worth a damn or that were not perfect examples of a bloated egotistical narcissism and a sadistic insanity is around zero. Ditto for any examples of a reality based normality, warmth, humour, normal or genuine humility.

The number of things said by Ronald Reagan that are timeless principles of truth, proven facts, empirical, insightful, useful, self-deprecating, funny, witty and filled with a genuine love of humanity and freedom are countless.

Thus to a Left Liberal and radical, Che the child killer Guevara is naturally always a hero and Reagan is not. Never. Even after destroying a vast totalitarian gulag.

Nope. Che the coward wins every time because he created a gulag and nothing more. This is known as a the ugly core of the Left. There's nothing else there really.

The more Reagan achieved, the more his flaws and image were and are attacked. The more exposure there is of Che’s sadistic nihilist evil doing and the more documented the abyss of his non-existent achievements are, the more his purely fake image is elevated and paid homage.

The same lack of principal applies to Norman Borlaug, who rather quietly has helped feed billions of people through his application of science fact and humanity. Borlaug feeds billions and is largely unknown. Whereas Rachel Carson and her profoundly discredited book Silent Spring, has meant perhaps 60 million Africans have died and millions more disabled by malaria, because she kindly got DDT banned.

Hey, she sold a lot of books though! Shared the royalties with the dead?! No.

She banned the only known available and effective way of virtually eradicating massive disease carrying mosquitoes down to less than 1% infection rates or 0%, and all without proven evidence of any danger? Of course, if there was a vast plague of mosquitoes in Los Angeles or her neighbourhood, she wouldn’t have.

Using the same formula, another Leftard hero is the Environmental Defence Funds Michael Oppenheimer and I quote “...We have to stop these Third World countries right where they are.”

You know, to save the world, dig? Not their personal world, but Mike’s personal world view. What a dirty Left illiberal Liberal fucker. Hey, dig Al Gore’s idling air conditioned limousine. His chromed steed awaits the Sun King.

“He knew all the time. Long before you found your cave, He knew. Guardian of the faith; Defender of the terrible secret. That’s it isn’t it Doctor?” Taylor.

Yes, the terrible, terrible open secrets of the Islamic Terrorism Timeline. This link is a truly great piece and er, mostly very much correct. I'm sure you can dig which parts in the minority I may not er, agree with because they ah, ain't correct. But dig, with that small caveat, it is a vast and spectacular roll call of harsh and hideous facts. It's an incredible and awesome achievement. That's the Prophet of Doom, folks.

“What I know of man was written long ago sent down by the greatest ape of all. our Lawgiver”. Dr Zaius.

“Beware the beast, man, for he is the Devils pawn. Alone among gods primates he kills for sport or lust or greed. Yey he will murder his brother to possess his brothers land. Let him ot breed in great numbers for he will make a desert of his home and yours, Shun him and drive him back into his jungle lair for he is the harbinger of death”. Cornelius.

“How about coming along? It’s better than going to jail for heresy”. Taylor.

“His emotions must rule his brain. He must be a warlike creature who gives battle to everything around him even himself”. Dr Zaius.

And that’s your average Islamist bastard geek right there. Here’s a favourite bit from Islam in action blog, on the facts of Islam coming soon to a theatre near you. Yep, to burn it down.

“Islam is not the religion of peace, it is the religion of violence.

As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

Nation % Muslim
United States 1.0%
Australia 1.5%
Italy 1.5%
Norway 1.8%
Canada 1.9%
China 2.0%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Nation % Muslim
Denmark 2.0%
United Kingdom 2.7%
Germany 3.7%
Spain 4.0%
Thailand 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population. They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).

Nation % Muslim
Switzerland 4.3%
Philippines 5.0%
Sweden 5.0%
The Netherlands 5.5%
Trinidad and Tobago 5.8%
France 8.0%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world. When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam - Mohammad cartoons).

Nation % Muslim
Guyana 10.0%
India 13.4%
Israel 16.0%
Kenya 10.0%
Russia 15.0%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Nation % Muslim
Ethiopia 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Nation % Muslim
Bosnia 40.0%
Chad 50.1%
Lebanon 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Nation % Muslim
Albania 70.0%
Malaysia 60.4%
Qatar 77.5%
Sudan 70.0%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Nation % Muslim
Bangladesh 83.0%
Egypt 90.0%
Gaza 98.7%
Indonesia 86.1%
Iran 98.0%
Iraq 97.0%
Jordan 92.0%
Morocco 98.7%
Pakistan 97.0%
Syria 90.0%
Tajikistan 90.0%
Turkey 99.8%
United Arab Emirates 96.0%

100% will usher in the peace of 'Dar-es-Salaam' — the Islamic House of Peace — there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim: Nation % Muslim
Yemen 99.9%
Afghanistan 100.0%
Saudi Arabia 100.0%
Somalia 100.0%

Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons”.


Hey, and imagine what fun it is for the millions of compulsory Muslim human beings in these jolly little spots on the map? It must be one endless delight.

“What evidence? There were no weapons in that cave”. Taylor.

“The Forbidden Zone was once a paradise. Your breed made a desert of it ages ago”

“Dr Zaius, this is inexcusable. Why must knowledge stand still?” Cornelius.

“What will he find out there, Doctor?” Zira.

“His destiny”. Dr Zaius.


"It's Doomsday...the end of the world...You bloody baboon!" Taylor.

What's goin on? Kill Mugabe, Iran’s Ahmachimphead, Castro, North Korea’s Kim Sung and their entire cabinet to start with.

It doesn't get much better than this. And that was precisely the problem with Marvin Gaye's terrible childhood.



“Mother, mother
There's too many of you crying
Brother, brother, brother
There's far too many of you dying
You know we've got to find a way
To bring some lovin' here today – Ya”.
Marvin Gaye. What’s Goin’ On.

You know my favourite album of all time is Marvin Gaye’s What’s Goin’ On? The pulse is my kind of pulse, and it never ceases to reach out and in opening his supernaturally talented and expressive arms, Marvin grabs blue note after blue note and sends them hurtling off into the endlessness and into his audience and the world. Ah, Marvin. You know he used to sit and cry with a pal how the Vietnam War was er, “unnecessary". Sadly, it apparently never occurred to Marvin the Martian that Communism is unnecessary.

It’s a shame too, that Marvin apparently never had the empirical clarity to kick his insane religious freak of a child assaulting, pervert transvestite and criminal Father in the nuts, and never contact the mad swine again. Hey, we all die badly and learn too late, eh?

What’s Goin’ On is so very seamless, timeless, spectacular, dynamic and smoothly wonderful and yet...much of Marvin’s geopolitical analysis is like virtually every other celebrity, actor, musician, MSM journo and eternally tenured radical Leftard academic etc. As analysis it's totally off, to put it mildly.

I’ve known many South Vietnamese tub hikers and they all felt that after the fall of Saigon and the subsequent natural Communist total oppression, mass arrests, mass torture and mass murder, the caging of hundreds of South Vietnamese anti-Communists in multi-level boxes and then setting them on fire, the total collapse of the economy and medical system into a Socialist Hell, the massive spy network, the mindless and endless indoctrination via the enforcement of pointless soul crushing behaviour creating the biggest refugee movement in history, well, it just put a real damper on the joy of being “liberated” by Communist control freak totalitarians.

Yes, it ruined the peace fantasy's too. It's hard to really enjoy the hard protested for "peace" when you're starving, arrested, poverty stricken beyond belief, voiceless, unarmed, mired in total despair, toothless, screaming in agony or murdered. But hey, "peace!" Like that's gotta be good, huh?!

Peace...yeah...great...lovin' that peace. It's so right on. Yeah, go peace. No war. Like in Syria, the Maldives and Tibet etc. Nope, peace is not merely the absence of war, baby.

But don’t worry about ‘em, eh? They're just Asians like my wife and anyway, all those Vietnamese refugees were so ungrateful for losing their own country and everything else, that they never even said thanks to Jane Fonda and John Kerry.

“Father, father
We don't need to escalate
You see, war is not the answer
For only love can conquer hate
You know we've got to find a way
To bring some lovin' here today

Picket lines and picket signs
Don't punish me with brutality
Talk to me, so you can see
Oh, what's going on
What's going on
Ya, what's going on
Ah, what's going on

In the mean time
Right on, baby
Right on
Right on”.
Marvin Gaye. What’s Goin’ On.

If only Marvin had escalated on his crazed viper-like Pop early on. Nope, only losing a war is not the answer. Though for Germany, Japan and Italy, being defeated and defeated utterly, was just what they needed to become decent capitalist democracies.

Dig. Millions of selfless trust funded hordes and many others too, protested how unhip and unfair the war was, and how it was going to be sooooo much better by default if the military forces and the people of the South, the US, Australia and so on, could just start diggin’ the groovy scene of dishonourale defeat and surrender. Then when the Communists straight out of a comic book acted just as expected, hey, what went wrong with the love and peace? And where were the laughs?

Oh, protesting university students meant how it was gonna be soooo much better by default for them after they graduated. Yep, never having to live in Vietnam enjoying the fruits of their own efforts was a masterstroke. Nope, the average Left Liberal was so selfless, that they wanted the Vietnamese to have it all for themselves.

And today, many of the tertiary and rich still lend a helping hand by hiring Vietnamese at minimum wage.

Yep sure, the war was a real drag in a thousand hideous, stupid and criminal ways, though not always in the ways many imagine. Only the gross errors and failures of the losing side linger. Thus 2,000 Catholics murdered by Communists in Hue's Citadel is largely unreported and not in the public mind at all. Ditto for most any of the massive, incredible and admirable achievements of the South Vietnamese military, civilians and their Western allies.

And in many, many more ways it was noble, courageous, effective and professional, filled with sacrifice and entirely worthy. Thus not a single plane or boat load of refugees during the whole war. Funny that?

Um, but all during the war there was a continuous exodus from the Communist North to the actually prosperous South. The war was prolonged by incompetence but largely of the US civilian authorities and hobbled by the phony ideas of the false dichotomy of war versus peace. “War” always bad. “Peace” always good.

The war like many, managed to be simultaneously beyond belief horrible and hyper "groovy", in the words of the truly great photographer Tim Page. Now it appears from a recent interview in Time Magazine, that old Timbo is in a few ways your as per Left. What can ya do? There's always trouble on Tu Do Street. Still, God bless Page and his incredible achievements.

Tim Page was the first and maybe only journo I know of, who actually researched and reported the vicious back story of that most famous picture of the street administered gunshot to a VC head. See my old post on this here for the unpleassant details. Then consider what it means for millions to know the image, and almost zero know even a single piece of essential context.

What were the Communist North offering again? Oh yes, totalitarian Communism. Great! Nothing says peace like mass graves...

Sure, quite a few of the more hideous folks in the South Vietnamese Saigon leadership should have been arrested. I'm so tres cool with it, baby. Oddly though, for corrupt and disgusting freaks, they didn't really stop all the people from leaving, earning a living, or getting medical attention per se, eh? Total control of every aspect of the life and soul of all the people, are par for the course in a Communist love land.

Largely the facts of the war are invisible to most people, raised on the uniformally bogus movies allegedly about said war. I've never seen a single film that actually rings true, cos they sure ain't about the war. None of 'em. They're all about Hollywood.

Peace is for the strong.

Well, did the Vietnamese get “peace” as advertised? Nope, not at all. So all those protesters, no matter what their alleged “good intentions” can only be wrong and possibly regards the whole conflict then, can’t they?

Yep, all those millions of saints and “artists” cared so much about the Vietnamese that once the war ended so badly, they never gave a flying fuck about the Vietnamese again and never shared the royalties. How many hippies went to Vietnam to help out after the war, you know cos’ now things are so much better? At last count it was zero. Hey, they had peace! Peace from war!

Ah, peace. An utterly meaningless word. As I have said before, they have “peace” in Iran, North Korea and Saudi Arabia ad nauseum.

Yes, it's so peaceful there, except for the endless screaming.

“Peace kills”. P.J O’Rourke. [The title of a great O’Rourke book and I also I recommend the wonderfully titled Give War a Chance, All the Trouble in the World and Eat the Rich.]

From a review of Peace Kills at Amazon: “[P.J] concludes that we will never have Peace, but we will have a war where we talk about our soldiers [and] we can say "They are our Heroes".

“Father, father, everybody thinks we're wrong
Oh, but who are they to judge us
Simply because our hair is long
Oh, you know we've got to find a way
To bring some understanding here today
Oh

Picket lines and picket signs
Don't punish me with brutality
Talk to me
So you can see
What's going on

Ya, what's going on
Tell me what's going on
I'll tell you what's going on - Uh
Right on baby
Right on baby".
Marvin Gaye. What’s Goin’ On.

But I digress. I just wanted to talk about Marvin and I got distracted. Hey, all failure is a lack of concentration. Thus Marvin thinks only love can conquer hate. Nice for a desk calender, but it’s utter balls. And hey, as for war is not the answer? That depends entirely what the question is.

“Get me the Police! My husband is attacking me with a knife! He’s killing me! Quick! Send some love immediately!”

Such questions can be how can I stay alive, when will they kill me and how can I get the Hell out of here? It’s the fakeness, bankruptcy and utter stasis of much of the world that’s the problem. Within a hundred and more states, their phony “peace” is an eternal and multi-layered war against their own people. Virtually every Islamic state, Communist totalitarian and African cannibal gangster fiefdom is a permanent living Hell of “peace”. Thus the millions who escape ASAP to the free West.

Like ignoring a gangrenous leg, it’s the avoidance of war when the currently offered version of “peace” is so thoroughly rotten that absolutely guarantees war eventually.

"And so castles, made of sand, slips into the sea, eventually..." Castles Made Of Sand. Jimi Hendrix.

Thus we get the canard that any peace is groovier than war. Nope. Most of the wars in the world are crummy little wars against the people by their own authorities or the cruddy authorities just next door. Few are major conflicts, but they will be and due entirely to the alleged masturbatory fantasy not of war but of peace. Yes, it all worked out nicely for Cambodia and Laos with their fun with Communism...

Ooh, New Peace! Now with added status quo! Gotta love peace. It’s always good. It says so on the label. If only we could all get along and be nice to each other? Er, no thanks. I don’t want to get along with murderous bastards.

And the final irony is that while Marvin kept on trying to get along and live in er, peace with his arrestable Father, he made his own violent death inevitable. His hideous and criminal Father had waged a psychological and physical war against not only Marvin, but his entire miserable family for decades. And nobody inside or outside of it had the guts to do a damn thing.

Marvin had an incredible and awesome sense of rhythm, sound, tone and melody and much so much more. Oh yes he did. Gaye could improvise like a God. Hey, peace in our deluded, wilfully naive time and out of time.

A classically trained and very serious twerp.

The celebrity Left has figured out how to make the free market "fair". It's easy! Control the free market so badly that the ordinary majority of people are impoverished, but rich celebrities keep all their cash, benefits and fabulous lifestyle all courtesy of the er, free market! It's fantastic! Stalinistic! Che the child killer Guevaristasuperduperish! It's Pol Pottadoodle doo! It's Mao and how!


Dear sports, here's a classic slice and dice of a rich Leftard from Monday 18 February 2008. Follow the link for a very nice comment from the fabulous GM's Corner.



“Actors are like cattle”. Alfred Hitchcock.

Round ‘em up, ship ‘em out.

Dear sports, it was ever thus with the largely unchallenged, dull, naff and usually Left mind set and views of most celebrities whether actors, musicians or the fully sedated in-patient. Yep, guess whose “educated and intelligent?” Amazingly it’s a musician apparently. Classical guitarist and “genius” John Williams is so intelligent and educated that he refuses to perform for surprise, surprise, er, Israel! Hey, maybe he is a genius though I don't really see it. And for such a smart guy, he sure says the usual bog standard rhetoric and platitudes available anywhere, of the frivolous and simply not serious Left kind.

Er, by the way John, the Jews have produced more real genius type folks as a proportion of their population and as a raw number in almost every scientific and creative field etc, than virtually anyone else, ever. If it wasn't for the Jews, our modern world could barely exist.

“Rhetoric is a poor substitute for action”. Theodore Roosevelt.

“Gaza, that’s another crime” drivelled the classically trained Leftard. Gee, what a hero, bravely standing up for the rights of Hamas, Hezbollah and the Al Aqsa Brigades to fire endless rocket’s into Israel and to kidnap, torture, murder, blow up and behead Jews. Jeepers, how can Israel be so hurtful to Arab and Muslim feelings by insisting on existing and wanting to keep on living? Maybe with the support of freaks like John Williams, Islamist loons will one day live their collective dreams…

“Ask a deeply religious Christian if he’d rather live next to a bearded Muslim that may or may not be plotting a terror attack, or an atheist that may or may not show him how to set up a wireless network in his house. On the scale of prejudice, atheists don’t seem so bad lately”. Scott Adams.


Ok, John is a very successful and skilled guitarist. I should be so lucky. But like plumbing or architecture, such a wondrous skill or talent does not naturally equate to deep and profound insights. Er, as with the skill of acting, on the contrary. And when a “genius” has the same views as the average Islamist loon and Che the child killer Guevara fan? How is this not appalling to anyone decent?

Sure, who’d care what he ever says if John Williams was actually a truck driver? No one. But he’s a world famous musician whose fashionably hideous anti-Israel and thus by default, anti-Semitic views are as per usual, ‘right on and Left!’ and perfectly in sync with Hamas and any other freak Islamist outfit.

I’m sorry. But if you deny the truth of Israel and it’s right to defend itself against over a dozen hostile neighbours, well, you are not a friend of the Jewish people, I’m afraid. The Left either can’t or don’t want to grasp this. I guarantee that the interview I sourced will generate letters to ‘The Age’ newspaper praising John as a great talent, a humanitarian, a brave hero who is standing up to BushHitler and the Zionist oppressors etc, but said in the acceptable and reasonable fashion.

Yeah, it’s very brave for rich celebrities to stand up to Democratic governments...Riiight. Er, what risk is he or any celebrity taking exactly, apart from getting uniformly lauded, congratulated, awarded and applauded? Yeah, Dick Cheney is gonna shoot him, right? Er, no. John Williams will perform, pontificate and get paid a tasty fee as usual and all courtesy of the free markets he can somehow see as flawed, unlike er, Socialism. Ha, ha!

“Iraq was simply a modern day war crime, wrong on every single count: common sense, history, justice, necessity” sayeth William’s the comfortable hypocrite and non-analyst.

Replace “Iraq” with John Williams and “war crime” with moon bat fool, and useless John is right on the money. I always wait to hear what liberation, or what actual kind of action such Leftoids would support. They never say. Nope, for the fatuous, easy, privileged and irresponsible products of Western freedom, the moral high ground of perfect inaction and the vanity of abstraction is the way to go, every time.

So according to John, an adult... the war contained nothing worthy or noble. There is nothing to be done, nothing now or at any time and anyway, it was all for some entirely evil plan, sadly hyperbolic of the frothing Kos kid kind. And there’s no place in the empty opinions of Williams and others like him, for the sacrifice and great works of the better men of the military, and indeed for any Iraqi who wishes to be free like er, John Williams.

“The reason the Intelligence Community is unable to define the nature of the Jihadi enemy, the Chairman implies, is because we have not “read what the enemy has said.” In other words, we have failed to undertake an assessment of the threat based on the Jihadi enemy’s declared strategic doctrine”. The Coughlin Report.


“I hate sophisticated hypocrites and I put that down to being Australian”. John ‘Placard Slogan’ Williams.

Er, quite, old boy. The self-loathing must be extraordinary. I prefer crude hypocrites. They’re much cheaper.

So John cancelled his tour of America. Hey, so no strangely sterile and unappealing Squaresville alleged pop and high level baroque cover versions, all played note for note pretty much exactly the same every time. Bummer. I should be so lucky.

Sydney Morning Herald’s Bruce Elder called William’s African “excursion”, ‘Magic Box’, “suburban and middle brow” and a “patronising travesty”. Look, many of my favourite things are suburban and middle brow and even a travesty. But where does Williams’s alleged geopolitical insight come from? Oh, that’s right, by default of being a genius. I hung out with a Mensa pal or two. Of course it’s better to be intelligent than dumb, but it seems like no guarantee of Quality Control, if ya know what I mean.

Yep, John has the standard and patronising travesty and old Lefty default of any handy cipher for posturing like African music, as not just being as good as, but superior to European music. Why compare two very different forms that express rather different worlds? Another gem from the genius. “There is infinitely more variation in African music than the Western pantheon”.

Last time I looked at music, there was room for everybody.

Yeah sure. What else ya gonna say? I’m sorry, but I beg to differ. It’s not a matter of one or the other. It’s what you like, know, understand, want to do, what relates to you and who you are. And er, there are many classically trained African musicians and otherwise, including jazz, rock, R&B, pop and hip hop etc. Why is Williams operating entirely in what he says is the ‘inferior’ one then? Daft as a brush, I say.

"So why don't people look there instead of searching the slender repertoire of 1823?" John W.

Er, yeah mate, so many contempory music greats are stuck in 1823. Er, no. The charts are full of it. I myself play nothing but. That's why I got a Marshall 100 watt amplifier. To relive the dream. Um, I think outside of the classical fishbowl, it may be noted that a few people have indeed "looked" into the African thang. Thus call and response, rhythm and syncopation via jazz, blues, soul, gospel, funk, rap and so on.

John thinks that African music is so superior, that he “ignored the available talents of African musicians”. Way cool, John. Funny innit, how Left ideology is left wanting in person. It’s a riot.

He says it was “heartbreaking” to cancel. Hey, I sympathise. Tough gig for a millionaire guitar player. Never mind. In Saddam’s Iraq it was not just “heartbreaking” on a scale that the average muso can only emote about, but it was leg breaking, back, eyeball, head and family breaking and really snapped economic and all other freedoms pretty much into 1.3 million smashed pieces.

John tore up his British Labour Party membership after Tony Blair apparently failed to deliver whatever he was going to er, deliver. Labour Party member, eh? Ya surprised, right? Who would ‘a thought it! And Williams says that Britain is “dreadfully unpoliticised!”

So, as Britain collapses into a sodden mass of PC Leftist Socialist engineered crime, Islamic intimidation and bombs, death and self-loathing dhimmitude, John says:

“More! More ideology! I don’t even have to live here! Definitely not in the poor mult-culti areas of the UK, that’s for sure. Bring it on the vast social experiments! Encore! Author!”

It never changes. The chances are about zero of finding many musicians, actors and celebrities in general who would ever make the same “heroic” stand in support of the Jews and Israel, or advocate the freeing of any people from any Totalitarian death state. Say enough bullshit “artists” to fill the average blasted out restaurant, destroyed bus or school room? Nope, never, ever gonna happen. Never. Ever. Nope. No.

“The end of the human race will be that it will eventually die of civilization”. Ralph Waldo Emerson.


For years I played a small game. Every time I’d look in a music magazine or any interview with a celebrity in the MSM, or even the alleged alternative press, I’d speed scan through the tedium of what they said to find the default George Bush insults, the absurd disgust with the system that supports them and all the usual celebrity guff. Two thirds of the time it seems to have always been there. It was funny for a while then it became oddly and bizarrely repetitive.

“No, they can’t all be the same? Surely? And so unchallenged and accepted as truth?”


Oh yes they can. Then it was just creepy and boring, went onto stupid and mediocre, and then moved to a disgusting and a horrible joke. Finally there was merely zero interest in knowing what the vast majority of celebrities, alleged artists and public voices had to say about anything, which is often outside of their specialty, precisely nothing.

“A healthy male adult bore consumes each year one and a half times his own weight in other people's patience”. John Updike.

Here is more pure undergraduate gold from John the Baptist, now pretty damn excited about the imminent PC Neo-Left Socialist Utopia of Kevin Rudd.

“It’s fantastic, so far anyway. Immediate policy on Kyoto and getting troops out of Iraq, the two most important issues in the world!” John again.

Let me put it this way, outside of his musical and business abilities, when John Williams gets into science and geopolitics etc, he is as dumb a plank and every other celebrity and dullard. Hey, so no war crimes involved in leaving 25 million people to their own shattered devices surrounded by Iran, Syria and other freak kingdoms, plus Al Qaeda and Pakistani Islamists? That’s ‘Leftard Moral Gymnastic Move No. 764/9B4!’ Another one of my favourites and obviously popular with John Williams.

So the most important focus for John is spending trillions of dollars to limit and damage the kind of prosperity that leads to er, I guess the kind of life John Williams has. And all based on a giant money churning scam by a failed student and failed politician, a horde of celebrities, pop stars and Gravy Train academics floating in a smug sea of conceit.

Hey. Let’s go with the absurd predictive computer modelling by people who can’t get next weeks weather right. And the end result will “maybe” be around 0.05 of a degree difference! Why not? Different to what they can’t say for sure, as its all relative, innit? I recall that between summer and winter there can be over 20 degrees difference! And it's even hotter on the equator and much colder in the Arctic! It's true! Is that what they mean? What should it be today, hotter or colder and by how much? It’s all bunk and with time, will be shown to be so.

So, displaying massive tactical and strategic incompetence, cowardice and PC Western security suicide to your far more determined enemies and the world, is the way to go if it strokes the moral vanity of a mass of lemming like celebrities? Er, no.

Are these really the things that focus John’s feeble mind? Not his music, earnings and bloated nonsense ramblings? Surely not? The “most important issues”, eh? Er, not getting real economic system’s and civil government’s to over a billion hideously oppressed people? Not the liberation of the child indoctrination, torture and murder states like North Korea, Iran and Cuba? Not global inoculation, disease control, education, clean water, ending child soldiers and slavery, helping the millions dying form malaria and diarrhoea? None of these and dozen’s more?

Nope, John is a typically deluded and an entirely fashionable ideological musician type. They mistake their emotional posturing with actual thinking skills and coherent understanding. Like virtually all Left leaning Charlies, it’s all about emotions and how they feel. And that’s as far as they can go, or ever want to and ever will. No need to, you see.

The Left are only interested in intentions, not proven results. They get around the adult responsibility to provide the hard work of empirical proof, by simply saying someone evil and Conservative is stopping them. It’s never caution, maturity or evidence. Any opposition is just being mean because they refuse to get as shrill, hysterical and passionate as they are. It’s unlikely that many folks, especially in the MSM will regularly find Left celebrity views repellent or wrong, and give them a damn good ‘Fisk’.

“I do not know which makes a man more conservative—to know nothing but the present, or nothing but the past”. John Maynard Keynes.

Gee, John and his wife travel a lot and “Iran is currently a favourite destination…” Er, quite. Oh, the hideous irony! Hey, did ya catch any public hangings of 13 year old girls for kissing? Or get to stay at any of the dozens of torture, rape and mass murder prisons? I can recommend a few places by name.

Gosh I’m confused John. Do you play in Iran? So you refuse to play in Israel but the filthy no holes barred, loudly murderous Jew hating genocidal state of Iran is OK? Check. Rapist, child murder Theocracy, OK. Check. Free Jewish Democracy not OK. Check. I get it John. You’re a classic Left fraud.

As he curiously says “I never improvise. That is a jazz thing. When I play with Dankworth, he writes out my solo pieces for me which he has improvised for me in the first place” Riight. Hence the predictable boredom. Er, improvising is a musician thing, I believe. Like the kind who actually have something to express, say or offer. I notice there’s also no improvising in his by the numbers Leftist drooling. It’s all been written out on cheap activist pamphlet’s decades ago.

As he says in ‘The Age’ Good Weekend for Saturday February 16, “We don’t think hard enough”.No argument there with what I imagine is his use of the Royal ‘we’.

“In religion and politics, people's beliefs and convictions are in almost every case gotten at second hand, and without examination”. Mark Twain.


“Labour hasn’t sorted out how to mix social justice with the free market”. John Williams: Fatuous rich musician.

Er, I bet ya don’t know what either really means. For John’s kind of guy, this means destroying the latter, by imposing failed and tax funded schemes that will enormously increase the former as injustice. The free market is social justice. Thus the vast increase of wealth, health and freedom everywhere there are Capitalist economic systems, free markets and Democratic civil governments. This is the inverse result of Left Socialism. Hey, perform for nothing John, so the flat broke can all come. Its gotta work! Er, no.

If I’m not mistaken, I believe John’s great success is due entirely to him living and performing in a free market. Could be.

For the average celebrity is usually relentlessly and utterly clueless to real world action, consequences or authentically intelligent thought. Beyond their passions there is often entirely nothing. Above the very professional, talented shoulders and ‘Cognitive Bias’ of John Williams, there is only an empty Sky.

“The very purpose of existence is to reconcile the glowing opinion we have of ourselves with the appalling things that other people think about us”. Quentin Crisp.

My boy Bill destroys classic Leftard logical fallacy et al via harsh and beautiful reality.

The mythical sub that never was. Yep, The Big Lie of my early childhood. Yes, if only every five year old could build a Kingdom of Cardboard Fantasys! Well, now you can! Become a Left Liberal.






Dear sports, everyday I get hold of something great and they come overwhelmingly from conservative to libertarian but still essentially conservative sources. No, really. I'm a conservative liberatarian for want of a better hackneyed phrase. If Huffington Post and Daily Kos are two of the top Left Liberal forums and they apparently are, well it can only be as Lester Burnum said in American Beauty regards his morning wank in the shower, "its all downhill from here".

The Left Liberal is overwhelmingly interested in their ideas above all else, non-ideas that they have invested heavily and totally in. This is above the objective truth of most anything. It's easy if you have absolutely no intention of living out a single fantasy or abstraction you may spout and advocate, eh?

[I have found that such cheerless chums are usually incapable of possessing the curiosity to actually do any serious research and analysis whatsoever. Hey, but then the whole house of Leftard Liberal cards would come tumblin' down eh? Yep, then they'd be a liberal mugged by reality, also known as a newly converted conservative.]

And these unproven and unprovable "ideas" exist in the same two places almost exclusively. That's within the dread of their moral vanity and the set in aspic future that never arrives, except as a disaster. Today all Left Liberalism springs from this.

The conservative is firstly interested in proven and unchanging core values including freedom of the individual above all else, absolute free speech, private property and the right of the citizen to have guns above the governments. All conservative libertarian ideas come form these things.

There is a limit on what a true conservative will believe in. There is no limit on what a Left Liberal will believe in except a fact.

And in this stripped down and beautifully clear way, I present for you, one of the most outstanding and hip pieces I have ever happily stumbled upon. But then, the cool always meet up at the same oasis, eh? Ah, you can get away with a lot being a kidder,eh?

I added some other great bits of Bill's becasue I just had to Mister!

This is the incredible Bill at the fabulous and indispensible eject eject eject site. I'd misplaced it among the files but dig it all. This is Part 1. I'll put Part 2 up as well soon. Groove on it as Bill takes down and crumples into the waste paper basket of history many of the major delusions of our time. Oh God, it's beautiful and awesome to behold.

After P.J O'Rourke, Peter Cook and Dudley Moore, Bruce Lee, Groucho Marx, Marvin Gaye, James Dean, Jimi Hendrix and Mark Steyn, Bill is my main man as they say.


SEEING THE UNSEEN Part 1.

Folks, as in The Olden Days, this is a long read. It is an essay, not a blog entry. Print it, copy and paste it, or just grab a cup of coffee and settle back.
Oh, and all the pictures enlarge with a click, if you are so inclined. MMMnnnnn...pictures....


I’d like to begin this sermon, if I may, by employing some of the rhetorical restraint of the BushHitler crowd and tell you about the worst case of child abuse EVER in the annals of recorded history.

I grew up on an island. I was in the water almost every day. I wanted this Polaris Nuclear Sub more than I wanted the sun to rise. I had picked out a grotto where I could keep it docked. Taking the ferry across the bay from Hamilton, I would look over the rail in anticipation of the day when I would shadow that churning wake, the periscope a thin reed lost in the foam, pursuing those fat clueless prefects into a perfect firing position and their watery graves!

And I am not alone. In finding this picture, I discovered that there are thousands of boys like myself, begging and pleading for the six dollars and ninety-eight cents it costs to build a fully functional, 7-foot, 2-man nuclear submarine that had:

•Controls that work!
•Rockets that fire!
•Real Periscope!
•Firing torpedoes!
•Electrically lit instrument panel!

I stared at this ad for months and months on end as a small boy. And though I must have read each word a thousand times, I have no memory of the phrase “sturdily constructed of 200 lb. test fibreboard!” It finally fell to my father to inform me that “200 lb test fibreboard!” is, in fact, garden-variety cardboard. My immediate response was “but wouldn’t that get all soggy out in the ocean?” And I am deeply ashamed to admit that after all that time, it is only now, in posting this on the internet at 47 years of age, that I realized for the first time that the damn Polaris Nuclear Submarine doesn’t even have a propeller.

Well, that’s seven-year-old boys for you. Had I been so inclined, I was certainly smart enough to have determined that one could not build a Polaris Nuclear Sub with missiles and firing torpedoes and all the rest for $6.98. All $6.98 would buy you in 1967 was a cardboard box painted like a submarine.

I believed it – like so many of my cohorts – because I so desperately wanted to believe it…and the X-ray Specs, and especially those damn Sea Monkeys with their little briefcases and hats and aprons. What heartless son of a bitch wrote those ads? I hope he chokes on his brine shrimp, the bastard.

We live in a sea of information, an Information Age: and yet, it has been almost half a millennia since mankind has been so unwilling or unable to use critical thinking to separate the intellectual wheat from so…much…chaff!

Critical Thinking -- the ability to analyze data, determine it’s usefulness and fidelity, to learn how to assess reliability, question methodology, weigh expertise and all the rest -– is in shockingly short supply these days. It’s not just a shame; it’s an epidemic, it is a fatal metastasizing disease in a democracy where information is used by the public to make the decisions that steer the ship of state. For the ability to think critically allows us to see the unseen; to find the truth behind the falsehood, as well as the falsehood behind the truth.

Today, it seems that legions of people – growing legions – are falling victims to ideas and beliefs that on the face of it are patently false...things that are so clearly and obviously nuts that you really have to wonder what deep, mighty engine of emotional need could possibly drive a brain so deep into a hole. Seriously now, there are millions and millions of people on this planet who will torture logic and reason to mind-bending extremes in order to believe monumentally ridiculous “theories”… theories drawn from an emotional need so warped and debased that you are catapulted beyond anger and disbelief directly into pathos and the desire to call 911 before these people hurt themselves.

So perhaps we could take a walk through Fantasy Island armed only with a shotgun of logic and a few fact-filled shells and see what intellectual tumors we may safely blow into atoms. Time is short! So let’s start with the easy stuff and work our way up to the Lord God King Mack-Daddy falsehood of our age.





CHICKENHAWKS.

Let’s shag a few easy fly balls to warm up, shall we?
The Chickenhawk argument goes something like this: anyone who favours military action should not be taken seriously unless they themselves are willing to go and do the actual fighting. This particular piece of work is an anti-war crowd attempt to silence the debate by ruling that the other side is out of bounds for the duration. Like all ad hominem attacks, (argumentum ad hominem means “argument against the person”) it is an act of intellectual surrender.

The person who employs an ad hominem attack is admitting they cannot win the debate on merit, and hope to chuck the entire thing out the window by attacking the messenger. This is a logical fallacy of the first order, because the messenger is not the message.

The messenger is not the message. That’s all you need to throw away the entire Chickenhawk response. But why stop there when this one is so much fun?
If you ever see this charge again, you may want to reflect that person’s own logical reasoning in the following fashion: You may not talk about education unless you are willing to become a teacher. You may not discuss poverty unless you yourself are willing to go and form a homeless shelter. How dare you criticize Congress unless you are willing to go out and get elected yourself?

Your opinion on a National Health Care System is negated out of hand since you are unwilling to get a medical degree and open a clinic. And as far as your opinions regarding the Democratic Underground or The Huffington Post are concerned, well, you can just keep them to yourself, mister, unless you can produce an advanced degree in Abnormal Psychology and Narcissistic Personality Disorder.

Using the internal reasoning behind the Chickenhawk argument means you cannot comment on, speak about or even hold an opinion on any subject that is not part of your paying day job. It is simple-minded and profoundly anti-democratic, which is why it so deeply appeals to those who sling it around the most. But wait! There’s more!

If you accept the Chickenhawk argument – that only those actually willing to go and fight have a legitimate opinion on the subject of war – then that means that any decision to go to war must rest exclusively in the hands of the military. Is that what this person really wants? To abandon civilian control of the military? That’s the box they have trapped themselves in with this argument.

Now to be perfectly honest, I think Robert Heinlein made a very compelling case for just this line of reasoning in Starship Troopers (the book, not the clueless projected travesty). Heinlein said that the only people who should be allowed to vote are those that have served in the military, since only they are willing to make the ultimate sacrifice on behalf of the state. I don’t agree with that. I think civilian control of the military has been one of the pillars of our nation’s success, and it has withstood the test of both World Wars and Civil ones. But that is the world you are stuck in when you toss that little Chickenhawk grenade.

Finally, if the only legitimate opinion on Iraq, say, is that held by the troops themselves, then they are overwhelmingly in favor of being there and finishing what they started. I recently received an e-mail from an Army major who is heading back for his fourth tour. The Chickenhawk argument, coming from an anti-war commentator, legitimizes only those voices that overwhelmingly contradict the anti-war argument.





WAR OF THE BUMPER STICKERS.

I’ve said before that living near the People’s Republic of Santa Monica gives you an unparalleled opportunity to see legions of people who can put their entire moral philosophy into a 3x10” piece of adhesive vinyl, applied to several tons of steel, hurtling down an eight-lane superhighway at six or seven miles per hour.
Here are some of my favorites, in no particular order:

Somewhere in Texas, a Village is missing its Idiot. I chose this one first since it’s the only one that has a particle of real wit. But the Bush is an idiot meme is very tired, and the most cursory look causes it to fall apart like -- how can I make them understand? -- like a lemon almond biscotti left too long in a grande’ caffe verona.

For starters, you can of course point to the fact that the man did graduate from both Harvard and Yale, but that was with a C average, and clearly, the idea of being merely in the middle of the pack of those getting advanced degrees from America’s two preeminent universities cuts you no slack from those community-college theater major drop-outs who love to level the charge.

So let’s leave that aside for a moment – Poppy’s connections and all that – and take a moment to look at this, if you will:
















This is a Convair F-102 Delta Dagger. It is a second-generation, supersonic fighter-interceptor. It cruises at 845 mph.

There were some minor aerodynamic problems with the F-102. For example, at certain power settings and angles of attack – like, say, take-off -- the jet compressor would stall and the aircraft would roll inverted. It is no picnic, skill-wise, to fly a modern F-16 with advanced avionics and fly-by-wire flight control systems. The workload on the F-102 was far higher. The F-16 has an accident rate of 4.14 occurrences per 100,000 flight hours. The F-102’s accident rate was more than three times that: 13.69 per 100,000 hours. 875 F-102A interceptors were built; 259 – almost 30% - were lost to accidents or enemy action while serving in Vietnam. George W. Bush flew hundreds of hours in the F-102. Now look at this:


















This is the cockpit of the F-102 Delta Dagger’s successor, the F-106 Delta Dart (I could not find an F-102 panel, but they would have been very similar)

Now, picture yourself in this chair, at 40,000 feet, travelling at one and a half times the speed of sound. Now imagine that someone has painted the windows white – you are flying on instruments. Now imagine that not only do you have to be able to fly blind, by referencing these instruments, but that you also have to stare into that orange jack-o-lantern of a radar, and interpret a squiggle that will lead you to your target.

Now imagine that in addition to not hitting the ground, or your wingman, and watching the squiggle, you also have to turn those switches on the right side panel to activate weapons systems, to overcome enemy countermeasures…without looking outside, as you hurtle through air at -40 degrees F, air so thin that should you lose pressure, you have about 4-6 seconds of consciousness before you black out and die.

I maintain that the instant George W. Bush closed that canopy and took off on the first of his many solo hours in an F-102, it is quite impossible that he was either an idiot or a coward.

Here is a random question from the instrument rating exam I had to pass a few years ago. Refer to figure 91:






















What should be the approximate elapsed time from the BOSEMAN (BZN) VOR to the DUBOIS (DBS) VORTAC if the wind is 24 knots from 260 degrees and your intended True Air Speed is 185 knots? (The magnetic variation is 17deg. E)
A. 33 minutes
B. 37 minutes
C. 39 minutes
(It’s C., obviously)

If he had been a civilian rather than military pilot, Dubya would have had to have passed 60 questions like this with at least 70% correct. Questions on weather, radio communications, mechanical systems, aerodynamics, pilot physiology, airspace, navigation and a hundred other things. But, since he was military, he also had to know how to operate that primitive in-flight radar, plus weapons systems, rules of engagement, electronic warfare, hydraulics, fuel systems...it goes on and on.

People like Michael Moore and Bill Maher and Keith Olberman would not be able to figure out how to close the canopy on an F-102. These people would be weeping with fear when those afterburners light up and you barrel down that runway hoping that engine doesn’t flame out and roll you inverted into the asphalt, or when you’re rocketing through the soup at 300mph watching two little needles chase each other, praying the next thing you see out the window is a runway and not a mountain goat.
George W. Bush is not stupid. It’s not possible to be a moron and fly a supersonic jet fighter, and everyone knows it.

What George W. Bush is, however, is inarticulate. English is his second language. From what I can see he does not have a first language. Abraham Lincoln spoke in simple frontier language in an age of rhetorical flourish. Like Bush, he was considered a bumpkin and an idiot, and like Bush, he realized that there were times when having people misunderestimate you repeatedly was a real advantage. That’s goal-oriented. That’s playing the deep game. That’s cunning.

I personally have gotten to the point where Bush’s malapropisms cause me to look at the floor and shake my head with an affectionate smile, in much the same way supporters of his predecessor used to do with every new revelation of coerced sex from former employees. He is what he is. But he is a damn sight more intelligent than the graphic designer in the Mini Cooper with the Village Idiot sticker. Me, personally, I look at the man’s entire catalogue of flaws in the same way Lincoln looked at Grant and his drinking: I can’t spare this man. He fights.

So to me, anyway, given the above information I feel that anyone calling President Bush a moron and an idiot comes off sounding like…well…a moron and an idiot.


No Blood for Oil!

Sometimes, the best way to examine a radical assertion is to assume that it is correct and examine the likely consequences. For example, proponents of the Loch Ness Monster assert that there is a surviving plesiosaur lurking in the murky depths of a Scottish lake. We are then drawn into endless discussion of distant wakes and grainy photos and claims of hoaxes, etc.

But if you cut to the chase, so to speak, and grant the premise, where does that leave you? Plesiosaurs are air-breathing reptiles that have to daily consume massive amounts of fish to survive. There are essentially no fish in Loch Ness. Does it order out for pizza? Also, as an air breather, we would not have a surface sighting once or twice a decade, but hundreds of times a day. If you grant the premise of an air-breathing dinosaur the entire proposition becomes ridiculous, not on the basis of the evidence, but on the monumental lack of evidence supporting the idea.

Likewise with a “war for oil.” What would a real "war for oil" look like? Well, US troops would have sped to the oilfields with everything we had. Everything we had. Then, secure convoy routes would have been established to the nearest port – probably Basra – and the US Navy would essentially line the entire gulf with wall-to-wall warships in order to ensure the safe passage of US-flagged tankers into and out of the region.

There would have been no overland campaign – what for? – and no fight for Baghdad. Fallujah and Mosul and all those other trouble spots would never even see an American boot. Why? No oil there.

The US Military would do what it is extraordinarily well-trained to do: take and hold a very limited area, and supply secure convoys to and from this limited area on an ongoing basis. Saddam could have stayed if he wanted: probably would have saved us a lot of trouble, and the whole thing would have become a sort of super no-fly zone over the oil fields, ports and convoy routes, and the devil take the rest of it. Sadr City IED deaths? Please. What the f**k does Sadr City have that we need?
That’s what a war for oil would look like. It’s entirely possible that such an operation could have been accomplished and maintained without a single American fatality.

We have lost thousands killed and wounded because they are being blown up as they continue to provide security, electrical and water services, schools and hospitals to a land ravaged by three decades of fear, torture and barbarism. It is the American presence in the cities, providing security and some semblance of order for Iraqi citizens, that has cost us so many lives. If we are going to be tarred and slandered and pay the public relations price for “stealing Iraqi oil,” then the least we can do is go in and actually steal some of it, instead of dying to protect that resource for the use of the Iraqi people. Which is what is happening, because, as usual, there is not a shred of evidence to the contrary, no matter how many imbeciles hold up signs and dance around in giant papier–mache heads.


Coexist!

You’ve probably seen this word spelled out with various religious symbols.
Who can argue with this? Not me, certainly.

What I CAN argue with is the idea that if only enough stupid, warlike Americans would just get on the Coexist train, then the world would be a happy and peaceful garden. Who else are the people with these bumper stickers preaching to, if not their ill-informed, knuckle-dragging neocon fellow commuters?

Unfortunately, here’s where reality inserts its ugly head. There is no more multi-cultural society on earth than the United States. The United States owns the patent on Coexisting religions and ethnicities. Drive half a mile though any major US urban area and you will see more ancient ethnic enemies living cheek by jowl in harmony than any other spot on the planet.

Thursday morning water cooler conversations about Dancing with the Stars wallpaper over more ancient ethnic and religious murders than history has been able to record, and this despite Hollywood and the news media’s deepest efforts to remind you on a daily basis that the black or Hispanic or Asian or white friend in the next cube is secretly seething with racial hatred just beneath that placid veneer.

Americans are able to coexist because they have subjugated, if not abandoned, those ancient religious and ethnic hatreds to join a larger family, that larger family being America. And this is why, if you truly value the idea of coexistence, you should be dead set against multi-cultural grievance and identity politics, which do nothing but pit one ethnic group against the others and reinforce, rather than dilute, ancient resentments and grievances.

Now as it turns out, there is one member of the human family that seems to be having a little difficulty with the whole coexist thing. Muslims are at war with Americans in Iraq and Afghanistan, they are fighting Animists in Africa, Hindus in Kashmir, Buddhists in Southeast Asia…they are blowing up nightclubs and schools and police stations and trains and buses and skyscrapers and are under daily orders to kill Jews on sight anywhere in the world.

I don’t mind preaching so much as preaching to the choir. When I see Coexist bumper stickers in Islamabad and Cairo and especially Riyadh to the degree I see them in Venice, California, I will be a happy man. They will make a very welcome sight covering over the Death to the Infidel! stickers that seem to be somewhat outselling Coexist messages in that part of the world. Until then I think we should coexist and carry a big stick.

End U.S. Imperialism Now!

Can I just take another quick second of your precious time to put this one to bed once and for all?

It is a staple of the left to accuse the US of “Imperialism.” That so many people can level such a charge with a straight face is a testament to the efficacy of forty years of standards-free education reform here and around the world.

An “Empire” is defined as a nation state that has political control over other nation states, and uses that political control to extract the wealth and resources from the subjugated country.

The United States of America does not have any political control over any other sovereign nation on the face of the Earth. We have influence, but influence is to control as a rich uncle is to a prison warden. That’s all you need to know. The entire idea of American Empire and U.S. Imperialism is dead on its face after that. No control means no empire. Period.

But we do have a large footprint in the rest of the world, and have military bases all across the globe. Is that a form of empire?

Look, the whole point of having an empire is to take the wealth out of the colonies and return them to enrich the home country. The US not only does not pull in the resources of other nations…it does exactly the reverse.

We pump billions and billions of dollars annually into those nations that host our facilities, and the minute any one of those nations decides we are no longer welcome, we pack our bags, leave and turn those billion-dollar institutions over to the host country. (Look up Subic Bay and Clark Air Base in the Philippines for some recent examples)

This is not “imperial behaviour.” It is, in fact, the precise opposite of imperial behaviour. I guess somehow STOP U.S. ANTI-IMPERIALISM just doesn’t have the same snap somehow for the North Korean-backed International A.N.S.W.E.R. crowd. Colour me shocked.

There are millions of people – actually, probably billions now – who genuinely believe that the wealth of the US was stolen from third world countries. This is one of the great perks of living a life free of the ability to think critically and do a little research. I have heard this slander repeated so many times I decided to look into some actual numbers to see if there is anything to this charge. This is a perfect example of how critical thinking allows you to see the unseen. That attitude, Google and ten minutes is all you need to shoot lies like this down in flames.

Okay. The US Per capita income is $41,300. That of a poor, third world country –Djibouti, say -- is $2,070.

Now it gets interesting. The US gross domestic product – the value of everything we produce in a year -- was last measured as $12 trillion, 277 billion dollars (hundreds of millions of dollars being too insignificant to count in this economy).
The GDP of Djibouti is 1 billion, 641 million US dollars.

A little basic arithmetic shows me that the US has a GDP 7,481 times greater than Djibouti. A 365 day year, composed of 24 hours in a day, yields 8,760 hours per year. Hang on to that for a sec.

Now, let’s suppose the U.S. went into Djibouti with the Marines, and stole every single thing that’s produced there in a year…just grant the premise and say we stole every goddam thing they make. If we hauled away all of Djibouti’s annual wealth, how long would it run the U.S. Economy, which is 7,481 times greater?

Well, 8,760 hours divided by 7,481 gives you an answer of 1.17 hours. In other words, it takes the U.S. 1.17 hours to produce what Djibouti produces in a year.
If the US really did go in and steal everything that the bottom thirty countries in the world produce, it might power the US economy for two or three days.
Conversely, the billions and billions of dollars the US spends annually in aid, rent, etc. – plus uncounted billions more from private American charities – would supply the entire GDP of Djibouti for hundreds of years.

Where’s your Imperialism argument now?

"You Can not Simultaneously Prevent and Prepare for War". Albert Einstein. [Old Albert showing his limitations. Colonel Neville.]

My first paying job in my life was teaching astronomy at the Miami Space Transit Planetarium. I have been fascinated by the stars and planets for as long as I have had a memory. I bow to no one in my respect and admiration for Albert Einstein’s stunning insights into the nature of space and time, matter and energy. That a young Austrian clerk sitting in a Swiss patent office could puzzle out the structure of the Universe using only logic and imagination is in my mind the greatest feat of intelligence in human history.

With that said, why aren’t the cosmological theories of George Patton or Dwight Eisenhower ever the subject of bumper stickers? Probably because cosmology is well outside their realm of expertise.

E=mc2 is a statement of such beauty and elegance that it commands belief in an ordered and structured universe. Human nature is not so ordered and structured. Psychology is not as predictable as gravity, and it is a mistake to think that it is. Human beings are subject to Murphy’s Laws, not Newton’s.

Quoting Einstein is an appeal to authority. But politics is not an area where Einstein is an authority. I give Einstein’s opinions on spacetime great weight; his opinions on politics and human nature, not so much. No one holds Einstein up as a great authority on fashion, grooming, family life, football or hairstyling. Why?

Because the modern era’s greatest mind clearly didn’t know diddly-squat about them.
Even in some areas where Einstein was an expert – quantum gravity, for example – he was flat-out wrong. “God does not play dice with the Universe," he wrote, trying to come to grips with quantum probability theory.

Well, turns out God does indeed play dice with the Universe, despite what Einstein says. Einstein refused to follow the quantum evidence based on the fact that he had a clear emotional aversion to the consequences of that theory. As a victim of national militarism in Germany, he quite naturally had an emotional aversion to that too.

But history is the laboratory of human behaviour, and history shows wherever you care to look that while being prepared for war may not guarantee peace, being notoriously unprepared is as sure an invitation to war as you are likely to see. To quote a politician on politics, rather than an astrophysicist: “Of the four wars in my lifetime, none came about because America was too strong.”

There is much more refined political wisdom where that came from, if you are inclined to look.

Quoting Einstein on politics is like catching a review of the latest Rob Schneider movie with the banner THE GREATEST COMEDY EVER MADE!! The source is never Variety or the L.A. Times, but rather the Palatka Times-Dispatch or the Oshkosh Super-Coupon Review. The quote is huge, the source type microscopic, because the authority is not much of an authority at all. (The smaller the source font on the screen, the more suspicious you should be.)

There is a restaurant near Santa Monica Airport, called The Spitfire Grill. It’s done in a WWII motif. In the restroom, at about eye-level for a person remaining still for a few moments, is a magazine page from 1947, talking about Soviet atrocities on local populations. The last sentence of the article almost took my breath away for its courage and moral clarity. It said:

PEACE IS FOR THE STRONG!

Gravitational lensing during a solar eclipse proved Einstein correct. History, recorded again and again through the ages, does the same for this unknown article writer, no matter what The Great Man had to say.

The day may come when the lion and the lamb lie down together, but if it does, we'd better damn sure be the lion. I don't know who came up with that line, but I wish to hell it had been me.




Give Peace a Chance.

Sounds reasonable to me. How much of a chance? Three years? Five? Ten years? See, now you’re playing me for an idiot.

We gave Saddam Hussein thirteen years before the Great Rush to War. He could have stopped the whole thing by coming clean, up until the instant the first tanks crossed the border. But he did not.

We know what “coming clean” to weapons inspectors looks like in the real world, because a few days after they pulled Saddam from his hidey-hole, Libya’s Colonel Khadafi turned over all the details of his nascent nuclear weapons program: blueprints, locations, stockpiles...the whole enchilada. We gave peace an even longer chance with the good Colonel, and we got bupkis: bupkis, and Pan Am 103 exploding over Lockerbie. That was our peace dividend. I can not see how anyone can deny that the idea of a little old-fashioned war and its consequence on dictators may have focused Mr. Khadafi’s mind somewhat.




War is not the Answer.

Okay. I’m listening. What is the answer?

No, you don’t get to say I don’t know but I know it's not war! If you admit you don’t know what the answer is, then it logically follows that you are in no position to say what it is not.

With regards to Iraq, Saddam started a suicidal war with Iran, and then with the United States. He then proceeded to break every single element of his cease-fire agreement...shooting at allied airplanes trying to belatedly enforce no-fly zones to prevent him from massacring even more of his own people, continuing with a well-documented and undeniable effort to obtain nuclear weapons, and all the rest.

So what is the answer, Mr. Moral Superiority? Sanctions? We sanctioned him for 13 years. He bribed the UN and stole billions of dollars for new palaces and industrial shredders for the opposition. Should we just leave him alone? The New York Times reported a few days ago that Saddam was a year or two away from a nuclear weapon. Do you trust the man’s judgment after Iran and Kuwait? I don’t.

War is an ugly, messy, filthy business, and the greatest slander I have seen in these last three years is the idea that somehow the pro-war crowd thinks war is a great thing. War is an awful thing. And yet I am pro war in this case. How can that be?

This is probably the most useful thing I’ll write in this essay:
Doves think the choice is between fighting or not fighting. Hawks think the choice is between fighting now or fighting later.

If you understand this, you understand everything that follows. You don’t need to think the other side is insane, or evil. Both hawks and doves are convinced they are doing the right thing. But it seems to me there is a choice between peace at any price and a peace worth having.

We cannot undo the invasion and compare that timeline to the one we have. The only data we can use to compare these philosophies is embedded in the pages of history. What does history show?

I cannot think of a single example where appeasement – giving in to an aggressive adversary in the hope that it will convince them to become peaceful themselves – has provided any lasting peace or security. I can say in complete honesty that I look forward to hearing of any historical example that shows it does.

What I do see are barbarian forces closing in and sacking Rome because the Romans no longer had the will to defend themselves. Payments of tribute to the barbarian hordes only funded the creation of larger and better-armed hordes. The depredations of Viking Raiders throughout Northern Europe produced much in the way of ransom payments. The more ransom that was paid, the more aggressive and warlike the Vikings became. Why? Because it was working, that’s why.

And why not? Bluster costs nothing. If you can scare a person into giving you his hard-earned wealth, and suffer no loss in return, well then you my friend have hit the Vandal Jackpot.

On the other hand, if you are, say, the Barbary Pirates, raiding and looting and having a grand time of it all, and across the world sits a Jefferson – you know, Mr. Liberty and Restraint – who has decided he has had enough and sends out an actual Navy to track these bastards down and sink them all... well, suddenly raiding and piracy is not such a lucrative occupation.

So, contrary to doomsayers throughout history, the destruction of the Barbary Pirates did not result in the recruitment of more Pirates.
The destruction of the Barbary Pirates resulted in the destruction of the Barbary Pirates.


And it is just so with terrorism. When the results of terrorism do the terrorist more harm than good, terrorism will go away. We need to harm these terrorists, not reward them, if we ever expect to see the end of them.

There are endless examples of this sort of thing. It makes me wish I had a mind on the level of Victor Davis Hansen so I could name every single one of them for you. But one example rings very loud to my ears.

After World War II, the allies captured the records of the German High Command. I was stunned to discover that the Wehrmacht’s generals were so appalled at Hitler’s decision to test the resolve of the Western Powers (by marching into the demilitarized Rhineland) that they were prepared to remove or even assassinate him should there have been any resistance to the move.

They were terrified of finding themselves in another war. Hitler, on the other hand, couched the violation in the same reasonable-sounding terms that Howard Dean and Nancy Pelosi would have undoubtedly approved of, and in he went.

Thus began the most horrible and tragic appeasement in the history of the world.
According to the Germans' own records, a platoon of French soldiers, stationed on that bridge and unwilling to retreat (there’s your problem right there) would have caused the overthrow of Adolph Hitler, and the abandonment of his expansionist policies. Why? Because it wouldn’t have paid, that’s why.

As it happened, intimidating the West paid handsomely: The Sudetenland, Austria, Czechoslovakia…It was only when the West finally realized the fruits of appeasement that Hitler was stopped. If it had happened much sooner it would have been much easier. If it had happened at the beginning it would have been painless.

Even though I did not live through it, I don’t forget lessons like this. Not something this clear. Likewise, I do not forget things that I did live through: that bullies who take your lunch money will beat you up more if you give them money and less if you fight back. There’s a logic behind this – predators have to survive every encounter with their prey, so why take chances on anything other than the sick and the weak – and there is an emotional component, too: and that is respect.
Thugs and bullies cannot produce anything of value. They have to take it from those who can.

Giving it to them in the hope they will go away does not engender love or respect in them – just the opposite. It creates more contempt and confidence. If it didn’t – if they behaved like sensible people – they wouldn’t be thugs and bullies in the first place.

This projection of rationality onto irrational people is the linchpin of the liberal failure to understand human nature. To those who tend to believe every claim on innocence from career criminals, I recommend COPS therapy. Watch any single episode of COPS and you will see people earnestly swear -- I swear to God, sir! – that they do not possess the drugs they are holding in their hands. What’s that crack rock on your car seat? That’s not my crack rock, sir!

It’s in your car. This isn’t my car! I swear to God sir! There are five crack rocks in your pocket. These aren’t my pants, sir! A friend gave me these pants just before I left the house! I swear to God, sir!

I have heard it reliably reported that once a police officer confronted a heroin addict who had passed out with a needle in his arm. When confronted with this, he supposedly said, that’s not my arm!

Telling reasonable people what they want to hear is a survival skill for criminals. They don’t get very far without knowing how to play people. In Narcotics Anonymous they have a spot-on term for this kind of behavior. They call it “dope-fiending.” How did you get that car? I dope-feinded my mom into letting me drive it.

When a spokesman for Hamas or Al Qaeda tells you that they are only fighting America or the Jews because they are worried about Global Warming, you are being dope-feinded.

How much more control do we have over terrorists if they are people with a series of reasonable demands, rather than murdering misogynists who want women enslaved and Jews and homosexuals killed on sight? See, if it’s our fault, all we have to do is change and they will go away.

But if it’s who we are, rather than what we do – well that’s a little more scary, isn’t it? That might be a little too much for the kind, gentle, sensitive latte-sipping lunch crowd to fully get behind. But that is what I hear these 7th Century murderers saying, and that is what I see them doing, and I choose not to look away just because I do not much like what I see.

Some people will believe anything if they want to believe it hard enough. Which leads us to…


Bush Lied, People Died.

Recent reports of the advanced state of the Iraqi nuclear weapons program, and the confirmed presence of 700+ chemical shells leaves this chestnut in some disarray. However, even if you take that away, the entire concept is a cowardly and petty retreat spoken by people who know better.

Here is a pretty decent encapsulation of what both Republicans and Democrats had to say about Saddam and WMD’s. You will find Bush’s and Rumsfeld’s rhetoric somewhat less adamant and warlike than that of Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, John Kerry, John Edwards, Al Gore, Robert Byrd, Nancy Pelosi, Hans Blix, Madeline Albright, Sandy Berger and all the rest. These were elected representatives who studied the same intelligence that the White House did, and came to the same conclusion.

Unfortunately for them, Al Gore in his unbridled enthusiasm went and invented the Internet, and so now there is a record of what they said and when, available to the great unwashed masses. It shows a group of people deeply concerned about what was a pressing threat to this country. And now, almost all of them claim they were lied to?

Are they capable of reading intelligence reports themselves, or did Bush have to read it to them aloud, with them seated at his knee in My Pet Goat fashion, skipping the parts he didn’t think would make a good sell? Some people say that they did not get the same intelligence that Bush got. To the degree that is or isn’t true, the record shows that it was the more outlandish claims that were not included, so that the intelligence that led them to come out against Saddam and in favour of military action was less provocative than the intelligence the President and Secretaries of State and Defence saw.

The invasion of Iraq was meant to prevent Saddam Hussein from using Weapons of Mass Destruction. This mission was accomplished by the time President Bush stood on that carrier deck. The huge majority of casualties we have incurred in the occupation and reconstruction of Iraq have come about by our willingness to rebuild and secure a country that we owed nothing to whatsoever.

Here is the legacy of the Bush Lied, People Died crowd: in the future, we know that no good deeds – building of hundreds of schools and hospitals – will go reported. We know that no foul deeds – a handful of idiots humiliating prisoners over the course of a few days – will ever be put into perspective.

So why do it? Why build schools and hospitals, and protect polling places, and suffer the casualties we have suffered to get a country on its feet, if all we hear and see is the negative and the undeniable failures? The next time we have to go and kick the hell out of some band of rabid crazies, why not just kick the hell out of them and then go home? Because there will be a next time, and I suspect sooner rather than later. By refusing to report the myriad successes and kindnesses, our compassionate and caring moral betters in the media have only shown there is very little reason to do them in the first place, except for the satisfaction of our own morality and conscience -- which I hope will be enough.

Let me leave you with something very, very important. It is the greatest logical fallacy of them all, and if you hope to gain any perspective in the world today, I believe you have to understand what I am about to say in your bones.
You cannot just count the hits and not record the misses.

May I show you something to make this point?

What you are about to see is a graphical representation of commercial air flights over the US on any given day. You will see dawn on the east coast as more and more flights get airborne, and watch morning spread to the west as the country comes alive. It is one of the most beautiful marriages of science and art I have ever seen. It is here. Go take a peek then come back. I'll still be here.

Every dot in that animation is a jetliner, carrying hundreds of people. This is the first time I have ever actually seen the miracle that takes place in our skies every single day.

Why am I showing you this? Well, because every single dot in that ocean of sparks is a successful flight. Tens of thousands of flights land in this country every single day and no one says a word about it. And yet, when there is an accident – and you would have to watch every dot in that animation almost 2000 times to get back to the last fatal accident by a large-scale carrier – that sticks in our minds, obviously, and that image of burning wreckage is what stays with some people on their entire flight. They do not think about all the millions of flights that land safely. Nor do they think about the thousands of car accidents that occur with so much greater frequency.

Why?

Because we are recording only the hits – the crashes – and not recording the misses, namely, the safe landings. If you had to drive to work every day listening to radio announcements of every successful landing, you would be listening to a cacophony of flight numbers twenty-four hours a day. After a few years of this you might be able to get a glimmer of perspective on the safety of modern air travel.

Likewise in Iraq. Hand out candies to children on a daily basis, and the smiles and gratitude are nowhere to be seen on US television. But if some death-loving lunatic decides to scatter body parts to the four winds you can bet that will get the News media’s attention. Complete a new hospital, or a water treatment plant, or bring electricity or television stations to neighborhoods that never had them before? Yawn.

On the day of the last Iraqi elections -- the day they ratified the constitution the press said these people would never ratify -- CNN's lead story was about nasty rain showers sweeping the southeast. About these historic elections there was heard not a peep.

Iraqi TV has a version of American Idol. Did you know that? They produce hundreds of hours of comedies, game shows – all that stuff. Sounds a little arcane for Iraq, you say? A little normal?

That’s because people who believe they are smarter than you have decided that such stories of hope and success do not fit the narrative needed to teach you poor ignorant slobs the lesson that you are supposed to be learning, and that lesson is that George Bush is a murderer while Saddam was a statesman, and that Iraq is a failure fuelled by the blood of poor, innocent, child-like soldiers too stupid to realize that they are dying to line the pockets of Halliburton.

My critical thinking skills, such as they are, tell me that you might be able to corral an army and send it over there under such false pretences. What I cannot explain is why so many people in the military re-up, two or three or four times, to go back and fight for this oil-soaked lie that people here maintain is the truth, despite what the people who have actually been over there have to say about it.
This is an all-volunteer military. Why would so many of these people keep returning to such danger, and put themselves and their families at such terrible risk, for a lie or a mistake?

If Iraq is a con game and an oil steal and an unwinnable quagmire then this just doesn’t make any sense. But back they go! That’s the data. The people most optimistic about Iraq – and those with the most to lose – are generally the same people. They are the men and women who are over there now because they believe they are doing something honourable and good. No one is forcing them to reenlist.

Hear that John? I’d hire any one of these people in a heartbeat. They are brighter than the general population, and they are so far beyond their Ivory Tower critics in terms of discipline, courage, ingenuity, integrity and honour that it makes one’s head spin.

Are we beating these terrorist scumbags and child-targeting insurgent bastards? Are we winning?

Well, let’s see if we want to switch sides with them. Let’s imagine the war where the insurgents have our cards and we hold theirs.

Imagine the US completely occupied by Al Qaeda forces, subject to Sharia law. We are able to take pot shots at a few of them, and we manage to murder a few dozen of our own people every day in an attempt to stop the population from collaborating with the hated invader. But more and more Americans seem to be turning to Sharia and want to get on with their lives. We find sixty percent of the population wants Al-Qaeda to leave, but hatred for the US insurgent forces – the Wolverines – is at about 98%. The people hate the occupiers, but they despise the Wolverines.

Now imagine that a year into the occupation of America, George Bush’s two daughters were killed in a fire fight with the enemy, which had surrounded the college sorority house where they were hiding. A year after that, President Bush was pulled out of a septic tank in Crawford by the Fedayeen, then put on trial and sentenced to hang, which he did on national television to widespread cheering. Condi Rice, captured in an early morning raid several years ago, has been a great source of useful information to target the American resistance, and Donald Rumsfeld was killed by a suicide bomber this last summer.

Everywhere you turn – in every street and every city in America – Al Qaeda forces run security patrols, training Americans to do this for themselves. The only way to stop this is by killing our own people, which further alienates us from a populace that already despises us.

Does that feel like winning to you? Me neither. Welcome to the insurgency.




Support the Troops – Bring Them Home Now!

Hey, I have an idea! How about we support the troops by bringing them home victorious? Whether the Iraqi people deserve it or not is not terribly relevant to me anymore. The troops deserve it. They deserve to leave that place on its feet, with an imperfect government – like every other government – and crime and death and all the rest but with some sense of hope amid all of that. Perhaps the same hope that keeps Iraqi men joining their police and security forces despite the danger and the horror. Regardless of what happens from now on, these people have accomplished something. They have given millions of people hope who had no hope before. That is noble and honourable and good, and nothing and no one can take that from them. That is theirs.

It’s a slog. It’s a slow, heart-rending miserable slog, and I find it as frustrating and disappointing as everyone. But I read history – a lot of history – and I have come to discover that from the inside, ALL wars are thus. We look back on World War II as a golden road to the inevitable victory, but it did not feel that way at the time. It was a miserable, awful, bloody mess with a list of disasters as long as the list of triumphs, but triumph and disaster alike were paid for in blood not because it was desirable or good or easy, but because it was necessary.

The people who are there now, who keep returning to finish the job, seem by and large to understand this. Supporting the troops by calling their mission a mistake and saying they are dying for a lie is not what I call support. Dennis Miller absolutely knocked the wind out of me when he said “I support this war, but even if I didn’t I’d lie and say I did, as long as we have those kids over there.”

This ongoing burden is a miserable solution to an ugly problem, but I believe it is the best of a series of very bad choices brought upon us not by our own doing, but by megalomaniacal lunatics who we will have to fight either now, over there, which is terrible and bloody, or later, here, which will be worse. Walking away from this fight now is like quitting chemotherapy early: immediate relief at the cost of long term consequences that are far more unpleasant.

I hate to be the person to tell you that the sub is made of cardboard. I wish it weren’t so. But sometimes all the solutions are awful, and it is the mark of a responsible adult, and a responsible adult nation, to realize that some problems you can not get around. Some problems you have to go through.





(In Part II we’ll look at 9/11 conspiracies, Global Warming, Chemtrails, professional cynics and Our Friends the Press)

Anyone interested in discussing any of this can do so over here. As for me, I'm always happy to hear from you.


CHAPTER ONE THE WEB OF TRUST. Posted by Bill Whittle at 01:57 PM July 24, 2006.

There was a time – and being born in 1959, I am old enough to remember it – when the idea of Civilization needed no explanation or defense. Everybody knew what it meant. Civilization was tied to another term, now likewise mocked, and that term is Progress.

Progress was the idea that society was moving forward, upward, toward higher goals – better medicine, faster transportation, the brutality of hard labor replaced by stronger, then smarter machines; abundant energy, increased wealth and leisure: all of these things were greatly desired, and society was proud to provide them, proud to show them off in World Fairs and Expos and in the mythology of the movies.

Now “progress” and “civilization” are ironic terms, in sneer quotes, muttered with that pathetic, bored tone of cynical nihilism started by the narcissistic brats that I have been ten years behind for my entire life. Today, I try to exercise and watch my weight only so that I may live long enough to see the last of these radical hippies die in their sleep.

The entire concept of Civilization has been so deconstructed, and vilified, that by having the audacity to defend the ideals of Civilized behaviour Your Author has been called a racist (nope – I happen to have African Ancestors!), a repressed homosexual (please – I have two pairs of shoes!) and even a potential cannibal! (What happens in Papua New Guinea, stays in Papua New Guinea.)

Worse than all of this – I can barely bring myself to mention it – I have been called a nerd by some of these horrible, mean, spiteful people! Me! A Nerd! I suppose that by having a banner on my website where a nerd compares me to another nerd by using a Star Trek reference somehow makes me a nerd! Preposterous!

Reading that made me so furious I just had to unwind and think. I removed my button-down triple-knit nylon print shirt (with all five Enterprises including kick-ass Enterprise E), and decided to just ‘go commando’ leaving only the black turtleneck underneath. I grabbed a Fresca, unzipped my boots and decided to pop in a cassette. (Man, that Dolby NR sure cuts the hiss!) Hanson or *NSYNC? ABBA or Partridge Family?

I definitely felt like some old skool, so I broke out the trusty old party mix with Starland Vocal Band and Gary Wright, plus some MC Hammer and Vanilla Ice representin’ that mad hip-hop flava I’m so down with, then put on my Yoda jammies and my bunny slippers, leaned way back in my plaid recliner, and began to ponder. Deeply ponder. Cogitate, even.

Why all the hatred? Why are so many people so ashamed of the most amazing Civilization that has ever existed on the face of this planet? What the hell have these people been taught to make them think such transparent nonsense?


I believe that human beings are interchangeable.

By this I mean that had Baby Billy been dropped off in the heart of the Amazon rainforest and raised by Yanomami tribesmen (and according to my mother there were times when I was in real danger of this happening), I would have spent my youth learning to hunt monkeys with my bow and 6ft. long arrows, and generally hanging around the shabono sleeping in till almost 6am. Likewise, if Baby Kopenawa had my parents, he’d probably be cranking out online essays at irregular intervals and shooting instrument approaches in experimental canard airplanes.

I don’t believe such a thing because I want to (although I do)…I believe it because to me it seems like coastline rather than map. I believe it based on the fact that wherever I look, I see a full spectrum of multi-colored barbarians and savages, and on the opposite end of the spectrum, a rainbow of the brilliant and the civilized and the decent. Rwanda and Bosnia are on different sides of the planet, and their citizens are as different-looking from each other as humans can be, but the horrors each perpetrated during the last decade should put to rest forever the idea that a few millimeters of melanin can save us or doom us one way or another.

There may in fact be some genetic component to intelligence, but if there is, I believe it pales compared to the effect of culture – and by that, mostly I mean the luck of the draw regarding your parents. In fact, I’ll bet my life on the fact that I can make astronauts and engineers out of any healthy babies of any color. I know I could make murderers and rapists out of anyone, and that this is far easier to do than the former.

So when we talk about the entire idea of civilization, a simple glance at history shows we are not talking about race at all. At various times in history the leading civilization has been black, yellow, brown, or white, and the barbarians lined up to tear down those civilizations have been of every color as well. So to make claim that saying one culture is civilized while another is not is somehow racist is patently ridiculous on its face. Anyone who claims otherwise is trying to shut down the argument because they know they cannot win it on facts and logic – which to some of these people are also racist. But facts and logic don’t give a damn what they think…facts and logic exist whether they like it or not. So do I, and I don’t give a damn what such people say, either. This intimidation tactic has silenced benign, well-meaning people for too long. How would a real Nazi respond to being called a racist? Hitler, dude, you’re like a total racist! That’s a compliment to goose-stepping sons of bitches. That’s a badge of pride for them. Only decent people are deterred by such rhetoric…and that is the entire objective. It works. But not here. Not anymore.
It’s not the hardware, it’s the software. It’s not race, it’s culture.
That’s what I believe.
There is a full-court effort to tear down civilization these days, to make ridiculous even the very idea of civilization, and that is a fight worth rising to. Because the unseen rhizomes of civilization – the impenetrably vast and intricate connections that exist out of our view, beneath the surface of our blinkered daily existence – produce so much that is good and necessary and completely taken for granted that to lose it would be to lose what makes us fully human.
And I don’t want that to happen. Do you?





Let’s start with the obvious, save the sublime for a moment….
I like to fly. Lots of reasons, but here’s one of the best: there is a moment during an instrument departure when – just for an instant – your head breaks out of the clouds but your body still feels engulfed in the mist. For those amazing few seconds you have a real, stationary frame of reference, and the sensation of brightening whiteness, followed by that incredible rush of speed as you punch through the top of the cloud deck, and the cotton turns to a blur as it roars past your ears…well, that’s worth the work it takes to do such things.

On the last day before my Instrument checkride, I departed from Santa Monica airport with my flight instructor to my right and my gorgeous pilot girlfriend in the back seat. We were given a clearance to climb to 4,000 ft. out to an intersection called SADDE. I expected we’d pop right out of the thin marine layer in a few seconds, as we usually did. But nooooo. This was several thousand feet thick – and dense. I can tell you in all honesty we could not see the wing tips ten feet away. It’s like the windows were painted white. Flying on instruments is just like regular flying, only you can’t see anything.

So barreling through the air at about 180 mph, I began my right turn towards SADDE. A glance down at the Turn Coordinator, a nice standard rate turn to the right, airspeed’s good, the engine seems happy…and then I notice that the Attitude Indicator – also known as an Artificial Horizon and my main view of the world outside – is showing me in a turn to the left, and increasing – fast.

Turn Coordinator showing right turn…Artificial Horizon showing one to the left. And in that instant, I felt something grab me by the toes. It was the sharp, tearing claws of panic, working their way into my shoes. I’ve had two engine failures in my flying career, and both of them were immediately followed by this same sick feeling. That fear has to be stepped on right now. If you start thinking about the hundreds of JFK Juniors I’ve read about and all the airplane wreckage scraped off mountainsides like the one I was approaching, then you are already most of the way to being dead.

Craig, we got a problem here. That was what I said, if in a vocal pitch that only dogs and flight instructors could hear. The turn coordinator and the AI are telling me different things!

He turns and looks at me calmly. Bummer!, he says casually, showing why the vast majority of CFI’s are not killed in training accidents but rather choked to death, found with finger-shaped bruises to the left side of the neck.

Then he gave me the best piece of advice I have ever received.

Kick its ass, he said. And that was it.

But that was all I needed to hear. God damn right! I’ll kick its ass! That’s a decision you make...a decision to not be ruled by fear and panic. It is a decision to take all of those hard-wired instincts that have brought us so far – the fear of falling, the rising desire to just call for help then curl up in a ball – and put them away. Forget what the seat of your pants is telling you: that’s an express elevator down to an NTSC report with your name on it.

The Attitude Indicator shows a turn to the left. Turn coordinator shows a turn to the right. But! Both the heading indicator and the whiskey compass also show a turn to the right. The A.I. – my only intuitive look at the world outside – is lying to me. I force myself to realize it is outvoted. We’re not turning left, like the little airplane wings on the little horizon in the little picture. We’re turning right.

This is the essence of training: the ability to do the right thing, not the instinctive thing. It is the voluntary placement of the human above the animal, the cerebral cortex above our reptile brain, which can be very LOUD in times like these. It is, in the end, a call to trust: trust your instruments, trust your airplane, trust your training and ultimately to trust yourself. This willing shift, this prying the claws of emotion from the inner voice of reason...

Trust, this is the very essence of civilization.

Trust what thousands of people have literally given their lives to teach us, even if it goes against instinct, survival and fear. Trust... It’s what makes the whole thing work.

Meanwhile, I need to notify Air Traffic Control that we’ve got a problem.
Socal approach, Experimental One Echo Foxtrot has a failed attitude indicator.
One Echo Foxtrot, roger. Do you wish to continue the approach?

No sir. What I’d really like is for someone to get a really big f***ing ladder and get us out of this mess.

Affirmative, One Echo Foxtrot will continue inbound on the ILS to Burbank.
One Echo Foxtrot, roger.

It’s much, much later that I wonder how and why the human animal – which when you get right down to it should really only need enough brainpower to make a sharp stick to throw at a gazelle – has enough reserve neuron connections to build a civilization so complex that a hairless ape like myself can chase a set of white needles across a four-inch instrument, while hurtling blind a mile up in the air at 150 knots without leaving nail and bite marks on the plexiglass. But, somehow, that’s what I did.

A few minutes later, I could see a patch of ground directly below, and then, after a little more needlework, we popped out beneath the layer. There, dead ahead, were the flashing approach strobes…Burbank Airport, right where those damn little white needles said it would be. Truth to tell, I was actually slightly to the left of the runway centerline, and Craig, my mute flight instructor in the seat next to me, was slightly to the right of it. That is a hell of a feeling, coming home to civilization, to an airport beacon right where it was supposed to be, to leave death up in the grey soup just this once with a weird, indescribable, clearly paradoxical mixture of burning pride and deep humility.

How many people were there with me that day? Not just the obvious two – Dana and Craig, whose support kept my monkey brain in the back of my head to return to throw pooh another day. How many guys were watching me on radar, keeping me separated from far, far better men and women who do this in their sleep up there?

How many people did it take to make the instruments, to mine the silica for the glass, to tap the rubber for the wires? Who laid the asphalt on the runways, who built the filaments in the approach strobes, and who attached the ceramic tips to my spark plugs? And how many millions of other unseen connections had to be made to allow me to do, routinely, and on a middle-class salary, what billions of dead men and women would have given a lifetime to taste – just once.

In those few minutes I just told you of, I stood on the shoulders of millions of my brothers and sisters, not the least of which were two sons of a preacher from Dayton, Ohio – now long dead but with me in spirit every day. I was atop a pyramid of dedication, hard work, ingenuity and progress, following rules written in the blood of the stupid and the brave and the unlucky.

I had tossed myself a mile into the air and landed safe in this Web of Trust.






Civilization is a loaded word, defined more often than not by its opposite: Civilization vs. Brutality. Civilization vs. Lawlessness. We’ll deal with both of those later. But for now, can we take a few moments to peel away the tiniest corner of the vast unseen web, to consider the depths of the Civilization we have built – Civilization vs. The Primitive?

Take a primitive society as an example – the Yanomami, say. Their primitiveness does not convey any moral disadvantage – there are millions of brutal people hidden in the folds of every civilization – nor does it provide them any moral pedestal either, for primitive people spend far more time at war, and suffer far greater violence per capita, than civilized people do. But one can call such a society 'primitive' not only because the tangibles of civilization are absent – the cities and power grids and transportation lines - but because of the lack of complexity of their Web of Trust.

In a tribe of thirty individuals, with infrequent contacts with what are essentially the same neighboring tribes, a member of the Yanomami may perhaps extend his trust to a few dozen people. Perhaps there is a witch doctor who attends to the spiritual needs of the entire village, or some herbal specialists in certain families who can be relied upon more than others to relieve pain and mitigate the symptoms of illness. The hunting may be done by a smaller group, gathering by another...but when all is said and done the number of people you connect to is remarkably small.

It is this close-knit aspect that appeals to many Western romantics, who admire the sincerity and human closeness provided by such cultures…that is to say, they admire it from a distance, in the pages of National Geographic say, or on The Discovery Channel. Needless to say, there is not a person in the West who subscribes to either outlet that cannot more or less immediately pull up roots and go and live the rest of their lives with these noble, authentic, warm, Third World people.

And yet they do not. And it’s not hard to see why, for they too are in love with the standard of living that their civilization provides – a civilization some of them, certainly, profess to despise.

Every time two people come together and trade, wealth is created. Out of thin air. By magic. Every trade, every bit of work done by every human on the planet increases the complexity and order of the whole, and thus makes it more valuable. This is a rich subject, one we will return to in a following chapter. But for now, suffice it to say that if I, as a member of a hunter tribe, make great spears and crappy baskets, and you, as a gatherer, make beautiful baskets and miserable spears, then when we exchange my spear for your basket both of us walk away richer.

Every trade, every transaction, increases the total wealth – for both parties. In a primitive society, where there are at most a few score connections among the people in that society, there is very little wealth, and very little leisure. The simplicity of those connections is plainly obvious. But how much more complex is Western Civilization?

If you could hear each of these transactions – trade and trust relationships – would that help? Tribal life as the sound of stones thrown into a pond at irregular intervals; a small village, the clicks of a Geiger counter; a city, the buzz of a hive of angry bees… and the whole of our incredible, magnificent Western Civilization, the clear, pure tone of a tuning fork.

This complexity is absolutely taken for granted. No one sees it. Ah, but Grasshopper…that is because you choose not to look.



Let’s look at Western Civilization at its naked pinnacle, at the height of its sheer fabulousness: Oscar night! It’s almost time for the Best Supporting Actor award!
Let’s start with the obvious: The amazing set, the stunning lighting, the beautiful people – not just American stars, but world-wide phee-noms. This culture reaches around the world. It’s a fair bet that every other crazed Jihadi getting lathered up for a good round of beheadings in Iraq or Afghanistan or Malaysia is wearing a Spider-man T-shirt or a Miami Dolphins cap or a pair of shorts with a Nike slash or one of the millions of other little trinkets mass-produced as easily as skin cells falling off the body of a sleeping Goliath.

But let’s peel away layers, shall we? One by one?

What about the television network that allows us to watch such things in the comfort of our homes? How much work did that entail? I work in television; I know how television and computers work – in theory. I could no sooner build a television or a computer from scratch than I could walk to Hawaii. I would be utterly incapable of manufacturing the most simple, basic component of a computer – one of the keys, say, or the on-off switch. Completely, and totally beyond my ability.

How many people did it take to make just one plasma TV screen? Just one? Not just the people that assembled it – how many people made the components of that plasma set? How many people does it take to make just the little green power LED? That’s not done in a hut somewhere.

And let’s not even begin to imagine the work needed to build the transmitters and fiber-optic lines, the satellites and launch systems, the local cable service, and their lines, and the repair technicians, and all of that.

I routinely have to enter a major communications ground center to arrange satellite uplinks to New York from L.A. Imagine a wall two stories tall and fifty feet wide, covered with perfect, brand-new color monitors – several hundred in all – on which is every show being broadcast over only a single satellite system. Hundreds of programs, in scores of languages, going up and down from satellites 22 thousand miles high – the entire world talking all at once, and those giant gold statuettes only one little window among hundreds, and thousands more unseen.
And the world... yawns.


Peel another layer: somewhere, a man is walking across a poured concrete floor, inspecting huge generators that power an electrical grid that simply boggles the mind. None of this lighting or TV happens without it. In much of the world, electricity is still non-existent, or rationed to a few hours a day. Not here. And this generating plant relies on water being pumped through likewise unnoticed underground arteries, being watched over 24 hours a day by anonymous men and women up along the 5 Freeway, not watching the show because if they did there would be no show.

And another layer: Outside, a man stands on the street talking into a radio. His job is to coordinate the few hundred limousines lined up like rail cars at a switching station. No show without them, or their drivers. Or the people who run the gas stations that keep them running. Or the mechanics that repair the engines.

Or the people that deliver the ice to the 7-11 to fill the champagne holders. Or the people that delivered that champagne in trucks, moving through the city at 3 am. Or the people that made the tires for those trucks. Or the Portuguese Engineer's Mate, 3rd class, who is attending to a potentially dangerous hydraulic leak on the container ship that brings the tires into Long Beach.

And another layer: That man, on the radio? He presses a switch, and inside that radio a connection closes. That connection is made with a very small amount of gold. That gold was mined by another man in South Africa. That miner was fed by a cook from Thailand. That cook’s mother was saved by medication developed by a pharmaceutical lab in Philadelphia. One of the biochemists who developed that medication is alive only because of a pacemaker made in North Miami. The man who empties the trash in that medical office is a big fan of Andy Garcia, and one of his favorite movies is The Mean Season. And one of the reporters in the Miami Herald Newsroom in The Mean Season was…me.

And it never stops…ever. It just goes round and round. Any permanent break in the Web of Trust and the Oscars… go away.

But back to the show: Oh, look! George Clooney has won! Let’s see what he has to say? Uh-huh. He’s talking about how brave Hollywood is. For going out on a limb and speaking up against the repression machine. Yes, there he is, like all courageous dissidents: worth millions of dollars, his every utterance fawned over by armies of reporters and millions of admirers, telling us about the incredible courage it takes to speak up in Bushitler’s Police State. God, the sheer guts it must require to be a Liberal in Hollywood.

He’s just come off of two brave, brave adventures, you see: one where the heroes are pampered, high-powered television executives, who, in a time where they rigidly controlled all of the information going out to the vast majority of voting citizens, bravely stood up and refused to acknowledge that many of them were members of a foreign-controlled organization devoted to the destruction of their nation, and championed their unwillingness to take the same oath of loyalty required by the most destitute new citizen or the most simple farm-boy soldier.

My God! What heroes!

But the award is for his moving and nuanced role as a representative of the American government, and it’s complicity in the illegal assassination of a kind and deeply moral Arab leader who only wants his wealth to be shared by his people, before being killed by rapacious, soulless American businessmen who only live for chaos and war because it helps line their pockets.

And the next day, this brave, brave man will wonder with a straight face why “liberal” has become a dirty word in America.

IT'S AN IMPENETRABLE MYSTERY, GEORGE!

Of course, this is to real bravery what a painted flat is to a solid steel bank vault. Sure, McCarthy was a blowhard and a bully, and while there is such a thing as “treason,” “un-American” behavior would be beyond my ability to define. But the fact is, he was right. There were hundreds of people determined to undermine this system and replace it with one that has shot 100 million people in the back of the head at midnight in underground torture cells.

Fifty years ago. Now, as it turns out, only a few years ago, a film director was stabbed to death on a street in broad daylight. He was not threatened with being fired by his own company. He was not being asked to sign a loyalty oath. No, Theo Van Gogh was stabbed to death, and a note left on the knife blade embedded in his chest, because a filmmaker dared to speak his mind about something that actually involved real risk to himself. That sounds like genuine bravery to me.

Will our intrepid free-speech champion be covering that one next, I wonder? I suspect not. Those murderers are, unlike Joe McCarthy, still alive. There is a particle of real danger attached to making such a movie. Perhaps this brave, courageous, Clooney voice will turn next to playing Boss Tweed, or perhaps the Teapot Dome scandal will bring him Oscar gold in the years to come. And in the end, who are we to judge a man’s courage, when he has already proclaimed it so loudly for himself?


There are a few people who were not watching the Oscars that night, who I would like to take a brief moment to call your attention to.

Paul Smith wasn’t watching George accept his award for bravery. Paul wasn’t watching that night, because three years earlier Paul got on top of an Armored Personnel Carrier outside of Baghdad International, and provided the covering fire that saved his Brigade Combat team. Paul was killed during that action. How many people know about his bravery?

William Walsh missed the show too. He and some of his buddies were huddled in a stinking hole on Iwo Jima, and when a Japanese grenade came in to join them, Bill threw himself on it without hesitation. Here’s the really sad thing: Bill’s sons and daughters didn’t see the show, nor did any of his grandchildren, because he didn’t get to have any children or grandchildren. He was 23 years old. We share the same birthday, I found. But I had to look for him.

Andrew Jackson Smith was a Negro soldier in the Civil War. He apparently did not suffer any doubts about the worth of the nation that had held his people in slavery. He was awarded the Medal of Honor for risking his life to defend…a flag. Because of Corporal Smith, the regimental colors did not fall. That doesn’t mean much to people these days, but Smith was ready to die for it. He believed in this country.

It took until July of 2001 for him to receive the recognition he deserved – a shameful lapse. But the wheels of justice, while turning slowly here, did, in fact, turn.

We can go on and on and on – all through 3,461 current Medal of Honor recipients. Not one of them could be named by any schoolkid in a hundred. Add all the other awards for gallantry and you have a small army of heroes, all unremembered by the huge majority of the population. And ask any combat vet, and he’ll tell you that only a sliver of the daily acts of sacrifice and heroism go reported, let alone recognized. For every selfless Medal of Honor recipient there are tens, perhaps hundreds, who have shown the same courage unsung. These people gave their lives for us…for this country and this Civilization.

They gave their lives so we could live in the freedom, security and prosperity that alone allows us to be so callow, so cynical, and so relentlessly ungrateful to those who have sacrificed on our behalf.

We don’t see these things because we choose not to see them. But we not only have movie awards, we have movie awards season. Oscars, Golden Globes, SAG awards, People’s Choice…it goes on and on and on. A civilization that is this debased when it comes to who and what they glorify is in some trouble.

And it is deeper than even that. It is not just the unseen heroes. It is the unseen, anonymous people that make this whole thing work. Right at this exact instant, there are men and women making sure that you have clean, safe water. That your aspirin is safe, and works as advertised. That you can pick up a can of food in any store in the country and eat whatever is inside it without a second’s worry about its danger. Armies of people, millions of people, get up and go to work every day to make sure that all of the transparent, unnoticed and unsung strands in this Web of Trust function.

And even when you are all alone, in the wild, as far from the Web of Civilization as you can possibly be, it is still there with you: in a body free from the parasites and diseases that have killed legions unimaginable, in a body free from pain, from the deformity of unset broken bones, in titanium hips and pacemakers we give not a second thought to. It is there in the mental bridge, the bridge only the designer sees as he looks across a chasm, before the first rivet is driven.

Civilization is in our hearts when we stand around a water cooler with people from all across the globe: ancient enemies, perhaps...people our ancestors have fought with for centuries and millennia, and who we now replay Saturday Night Live routines for before heading back to our cubicles to refine a little more order out of the chaos.

So mark these words, for this is not something beyond our control:
Civilizations fall because people bitch and complain when the electricity is off for fifteen minutes, and never give a thought to the fact that it has been on for their entire lives.







I'm off to Oshkosh for a few days. Comments, critiques and anonymous ad hominem attacks can be made here. Posted by Bill Whittle at 10:46 PM
June 26, 2006 UP NEXT...

Well, it's great to be back. Thanks, as always, for all of the kind words.
I have done a pretty substantial re-write of RAFTS. It's cleaner, better organized, less redundant and a little more impassioned. Much of the "maps" material was cut and pasted from two different sources, and I may have hit COPY AND PASTE three or four hundred times by accident. Anyway, I like it much better now.

Next is CHAPTER ONE: THE WEB OF TRUST. Ever been to the Oscars? Me neither. However, that night is as good an instant as any to get an idea of what it is that makes up this civilization.

Hint: It ain't in front of the cameras. Hopefully in the next day or two. See you then.

BW

INTRODUCTION: RAFTS. Posted by Bill Whittle at 11:03 PM June 18, 2006.

This is the introduction to a new book entitled AN AMERICAN CIVILIZATION. Regular readers -- and thank you for your support and patience these past long months -- may notice that there is in this chapter some recycled material, although none from the SILENT AMERICA essays. In this one case, I could not think of a better way to express an idea I had played with back in 2004.
[UPDATE: This post has been substantially re-written since it was first posted.]







There is a British tradition at Christmas time, a tradition I would love to see transplanted to these American shores. It’s an old form of interactive theater called the Pantomime.

I almost wrote ‘interactive children’s theater,’ but that would be to sell it short. Children’s theater today is completely Barneyfied – all syrup and rainbows. Pantomimes were derived from the classics, with pirates and other scary villains, and swordfights and the like. It was the kind of thing a young boy could sit through for two hours without thoughts of escape or serial homicide. It was the first live theater we children had ever seen, a magical experience turbocharged by the immediate proximity of the most magical night of them all.

There are two traditions that I remember clearly. First, the young male leads – Peter Pan, say – were invariably played by hot young women in tights, leaving eight year old boys watching swordfights, rooting for Peter or Puss in Boots, while in the deep back of the mind some faint but growing voice was whispering under all that cheering, saying Man, look at those legs! That was confusing.

What wasn’t confusing was the audience participation. Children and parents were encouraged to hiss loudly when Captain Hook entered the stage, to shout warnings of ambush and hiding places. It was a loud, screaming, cheering, full-on blast.

Now the other thing I remember is that moment in Peter Pan where Tinkerbell lies dying…dying from a lack of belief. It is at this point that Peter Pan would walk to the front of the stage, and implore us in the most desperate terms to clap as loudly as we could to show how much we believed in her, believed in magic, believed in redemption, believed in the power of our own belief.

We would clap till our hands were raw, clap and stomp our feet until the foundations shook, parents and children alike, while Peter would shake his head sadly and tell us it wasn’t belief enough. Then we would clap like furies, scream like Viking berserkers, mom and dad beside us, hollering and shouting and stomping their feet, a wall of sound, a rhythmic, pulsating tsunami of emotion…and then, just then, the slightest stirring of a delicate hand…


Humans are animals. I do not mean that in a negative way. But that is what we are: creatures capable of great good and great harm, susceptible to animal fears and passions, lower than angels but not without grace. Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn – a man who has seen a fair amount of both good and evil – wrote of that fault line, “that line separating good and evil, passing not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties, but right through every human heart."

As animals, we are wired to live in a state of nature. In the long marathon of our history, our civilizations are only the last two or three halting steps. It took millions of years to build the human animal. It will likely take that long again to design out all of the passions and furies that brought us here.

Until then, we live with a choice: to live in a state of nature, or a state of law. The state of nature is the default condition that the huge majority of human lives has lived under, and continue to live under to this very day – lives solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short in Hobbes’ memorable phrase.

Or, we can choose to impose upon our internal fault line a series of laws and customs, a Civilization, that imperfectly attempts to keep as many of us as possible on the side of the angels.

That Civilization is not a natural state. It is highly artificial and daily runs into our proclivities for murder, greed, pride and mayhem. And because of that artifice, it is a structure that not only must be built, but one which must be maintained, only once, and that is constantly. Victor Davis Hanson -- whom I deeply admire -- described this as rust build-up on an iron structure, rust that must be regularly removed if the structure is to remain standing. That seems exactly right to me. And so here is my poor attempt at providing something no more or less important than a small wire brush.

The maintenance of that Civilization requires many prerequisite tools, and in the following pages I hope we can examine some of them. But the elbow grease, the one indispensable element, is that belief: belief that this work is worth doing. It is the belief that we can drain the open sewers of our most base impulses, and in their place build lives of decency and civility. It is, in the long run, the belief that we can make Tinkerbell fly.

Now there are people who do not much admire this iron bridge we have built, this bridge from the terror and anarchy of the jungle to the distant shores of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. There was a time when these forces were strong enough to tear down that bridge. That time may again come. But for now, they lack the power to pull down this Civilization. But they do have the power to get us to forgo the wire brush.

In the pages that follow, I will do my flat-out level best to try not to generalize, and to confine my anger specifically to those who daily unscrew the bolts and drill out the rivets of this magnificent Civilization. We are past the point of name-calling now. The hour is late. This is too important for arguments between Republicans and Democrats, Conservatives and Liberals, or Hawks and Doves. There are villains and heroes aplenty on all sides, and we are going to need every hand that we can get.

So where are we?

Islamist terror masters are about to go nuclear, and an army of foreign nationals are flooding over the border. Liberals haven’t had a new idea since the National Health Card, Conservatives would lose the next election if they ran unopposed, Western birthrates are plummeting, lawlessness is rampant, everywhere you look the seams are starting to crack, and above it all sits an Imperial Congress riddled with corruption, stone-deaf to the howls of public outrage, and looking very tender indeed at the merest thought of being held accountable for anything. Why, it’s calamity enough to put you in mind of Shakespeare:

Now is the Winter of our Discontent, made more of a Bummer by these Sons of Pork…

Yes, yes – I get it. To the Untrained Eye it looks like Western Civ is going to hell in a hand basket; each of its former stalwarts marching silently into the sea, our only consolation as Americans being that we appear to be at the back of the line, leaning to the side of the queue to see which part of Europe takes the Big Drink first; our own progress towards oblivion being delayed somewhat by the usual band of Right-Wing Gun Nuts, Morality Hypocrites, Talk Radio Blowhards and Chickenhawk Bloggers – all four categories of which, thanks to Hugh Hewitt and Kim Du Toit, I now find myself in.

It doesn’t seem to take much arguing to conclude that Western Civilization, if not on the path to utter destruction, is at the very least somewhat frayed around the edges. One gets that sense of desperation most clearly from my good friend Mark Steyn (whom I have never met nor spoken to and who doesn’t know me from Adam) and his reports from an aging and impotent Continent whose civilization has ruled the world for no less than half a millennium and who now stands hunched and toothless, without even the courage to shake a fist at the backs of their new overlords… who, indeed, seem only able to mutter their gratitude that they will not live long enough to witness the final collapse.

When my mother, who is British, thinks of the shores of England she sees Spitfires returning home after splashing the Hun invaders in the North Sea. Nowadays you’re more likely to visualize twerps like George “Shrinkage” Galloway, sunbathing in his red leotards on her pebble-strewn, frigid shores, and Red Ken Livingston sitting alone in the only warm patch of water in the entire English Channel.

And needless to say, we are not without our own species of Suicide Lemmings. Surely the existence of Michael Moore is proof enough – as if more proof was needed – that given enough Civilization, the laws of Darwin will often be supplanted by those of Murphy.

Everywhere I’ve looked – and I’ve been looking around a lot – I get the sense of powerless frustration, of standing on the beach as the Thousand Foot Wave rises up to block out the sun and take everything we have built and fought for with it.
The forces of ignorance and barbarism – bearers of ruin and despair wherever they make camp – are growing in confidence. But beside their will to destroy and die they have nothing.

These Death Cult barbarians think this is all they will need – that, and an initial alliance with the forces they most despise.

I still hold out hope that they will crack open a second book – a history book, say – that might at the eleventh hour give them some insight into the avocado nature of the Civilization they seem determined now to assault: soft and pulpy on the outside, impenetrably tough and hard within.

They are going to do more than chip a tooth on us, these raving, bloodthirsty lunatics: they are about to make, I think, the same mistake that others have made before them – to see the Cindy Sheehans and Michael Moores as representative of a corrupt and dying culture, rather than what they really are: somewhat entertaining animal acts we Westerners use to pass the time while waiting for the next opportunity to pull the gloves off, and kick some new inhuman, barbaric horde onto the ash heap of history, where reside Aristocracy, Slavery, Fascism and Communism, holding in common only the mark of our boots on their asses.


There was a time, an age ago, where the differences between what we call the Left and the Right seemed more or less academic; maybe the distance from one high-rise tower to its twin – close enough to see the coffee mugs and family photos on the other side’s desk. Then something happened.

Now we peer across a divide so wide that we can no longer see the other side; where the residents of the opposing camps are not viewed as having a difference of opinion so much as being considered insane.

Two worldviews this opposed cannot both be right (although they could both be wrong). I was about to write that one of them must be closer to the truth, but I stopped myself, for often people will define truth as conforming to their ideology, rather than the reverse. But surely one of these positions must conform better to reality, to the evidence, for anyone with an open mind to see?
Which one? And how do we tell?

People of good will on both sides value peace and freedom, yet we have diverging choices to make, and we have to make them now. We have to chart our course, a course for our country, and ultimately, a course for the entire world.

We need a map. Several are for sale. How do we choose?

Actually, it’s not so difficult. We can choose the map that best conforms to the coastline we see unveiling before us. We choose the map that best matches reality – the objective, external, indisputable reality of bays and promontories, capes and gulfs and rivers and shoals.

We can, indeed, lay out competing philosophies on the table, and see where each conforms to reality and where it does not. No maps are without distortions; none of these are likely to be, either. And one map may conform perfectly to the coastline in one area, and be dreadfully amiss in another. We can cut and paste them as we wish. This is too important for us to be arguing about who is right – all our energies must go to getting it right.

And before we start, we must agree to one thing: we will never be so full of arrogance and blinded by pride that we dare confront a place where our map does not match the coastline, and proclaim that the coastline must be wrong.

I have a mental map of the world. So do you. So did Lenin, and al-Zarqawi, and Winston Churchill, and Attila, and Ronald Reagan. Everyone has an internal map of how the world works.

The problem is that we get rather fond of these maps. Some people feel that if one only had enough paper, and enough time, one could chart the world without ever going up on deck at all. They trade and collect and discuss these charts as if they were comic books or baseball cards. If they see something on another map that seems to agree, more or less, with what they have sketched out on their own, they feel vindicated. This is human nature. I do it, and you do it too.

How much pain and torture, how many human lives -- each as unique and wonderful as your own -- have been snuffed out of existence because self-righteous, power-mad bastards have waved maps written decades, or centuries, or millenia before, without so much as a peek out the window at how the world really works?

How many of the criticisms levelled at this civilization are genuine, and how many are nothing more than sketches on parchment in the minds of bitter and vindictive people who dare not face the light of day? How many people have died because a person would rather see a thousand people taken out in the night and shot in the head -- or a million people, or a hundred million -- seen them shot in the head, rather than facing the coastline and changing their mind?

When you use your common sense, your personal experience, over any of the so-called “social theories” being sold at fire sale prices, you are walking out of the dungeon of social theory and endless argumentation, walking up the ladder, mounting the bridge and looking out the window to see whether or not the map matches the coastline. If it does not, then it doesn’t matter how credentialed or tenured or respected the cartographer is or was -– he is wrong. He says river delta; there sits a barrier reef. Wrong!

Next map!

Navigation by means of reason and logic, taking sightings from historical landmarks and always keeping the firm hand of common sense on the wheel, can steer us clear of these dangerous and confusing shoals. This sort of thinking, what is essentially scientific thinking, is a new tool, relatively speaking.

It is a powerful tool, one that makes powerful demands of us, asking us to forgo pride and ego and preconception. It asks us, as blind men and women in the darkness of the present, to walk into the future not by imagining a map that is to our liking, but rather to learn to navigate like bats and dolphins, pinging our surroundings, interrogating nature and history at every turn, finding fixed points of reference that we can use to triangulate where we are and where we are headed.


These people, down below, arguing endlessly in the chartroom -– they have a word for themselves that they find flattering. They call themselves intellectuals. A friend of mine referred to me as an intellectual the other day, and I nearly knocked him off the bar stool. What a repellent thing to say to a man who tries on a daily basis to pre-flight his facts to make sure his theories – his maps – are as accurate as it can be. Things change. Things that were once true sometimes no longer are. The map has to change or you are in deep yogurt. It is that process, not my map, that I am trying to teach to the best of my ability.

There was a time when intellectual meant someone who uses reason and intellect. Today, people who call themselves intellectuals are in a form of mental death spiral: they search for, and find, those index cards that support their world view, and clutch little red books like rosaries in the face of all external evidence. They are ruled by appeals to authority. Their self-image and sense of emotional well-being trumps any and all objective evidence to the contrary.

Many (perhaps most) things these intellectuals believe are so wrong, in so many places, that they are far worse than no maps at all. They draw all manner of hazards where there are none, and disastrously, they show open seas and smooth sailing in the most treacherous and deadly places.

Such maps are not merely worthless; they are dangerous. Ronald Reagan once said that the problem is not that these intellectual social theorists are ignorant; "it's just so much of what they know isn't so."

I am hammering this point here in the very beginning because so much of the corrosion attached to this American Civilization is, in the final analysis, nothing more than the assertions of pedigreed people who have an axe or two or three to grind, and in order to scrape off that corrosion, we are going to have to look at hard facts and draw our own conclusions.

How many students today believe what they believe because they met someone who knew a guy whose girlfriend turned him on to an article by Noam Chomsky? Noam Chomsky predicted, in his even, intellectual, authoritative, tenured manner, that if the US went to war in Afghanistan after 9/11, the result would be 3 million Afghan casualties.

How many of these students who worship St. Noam independently ask themselves why he had come up 2,999,500 bodies short? Noam is not wrong by a factor of one or two; Noam is not wrong by an order of magnitude. Noam is not wrong by a factor of a hundred to one. Noam is wrong by more than three orders of magnitude. Noam is wrong by a factor of 6,000 to one. Noam says the reef is three miles off the port bow, when in fact it is barely ten feet away. That’s six thousand to one. Noam says the ocean is a thousand feet deep when in fact the keel has been ripped out and is sitting on the sandbar back yonder: that’s a 6,000-to-one error. Extrapolating this accuracy rate, if Noam writes 6,000 pages on the evil of the United States, how many pages of truth might there be in such a twenty-volume set?

Does this mean that everything Noam Chomsky writes is nonsense? Not at all. He is a professor of Linguistics. I am not qualified to say how accurate the work in his field of expertise is. I can however make a stab at how accurate he is in the field of US foreign policy, and if you have a handheld calculator at home, you can make the same comparison and achieve the same results.

We are not blind, and we are not crippled, and the world is not a novel or a treatise or a theory or a manifesto. It exists. We can go look for ourselves. And on the way up, when those desperate elitist bastards start clutching at your ankles and implore you to stay below where it’s safe and argue some more…be sure to kick those sons of bitches right in the teeth. Their blind obedience to their Big Ideas have killed more people in history than anything except disease. Boot to the teeth, I say. But that’s just me. You’ve been around. You’re no sap. What do you think?


Socialist intellectuals will tell you that Cuba is a model nation: universal free health care, near total literacy, and essentially no gap whatsoever between the rich and the poor. They call it an island paradise where brotherhood and compassion reign in stark contrast to the brutal inequalities of the heartless and racist capitalist monster to the North, ruled by its Imperial Nazi King, who is the devious mastermind of all manner of Conspiratorial Wheels and is also a moron.

Capitalist intellectuals -– and there are not many, since most of these people have jobs -– argue that Cuba is a squalid, corrupt, poverty-ridden basket case, a land of oppression and secret police and torture chambers run by a megalomaniac who practices the most idiotic, inhuman and degrading economic system ever invented.
So here we sit in the chartroom, with our competing maps. What to think?

Well, ask yourself what it would take to give up your home, your country, your family and all your friends. Ask yourself how desperate you would have to be to sneak out in the night, and strap your family – your grandmother and infant son – to a collection of inner tubes lashed together and set out in the dark surf across 90 miles of shark-infested water in the dead of night, hoping against hope to make landfall. We can all agree, I think, that that kind of desperation could only be driven by a fairly passionate first-person opinion of such things. Surely this goes beyond what you or I would do to win a map argument at Starbucks.
So. Go up on deck, get out the telescope, and answer one simple question for me and for yourself:

Which way are the rafts headed?



We need to know how to cut to core truths. We need to practice testing our maps against the shoreline. We need to do this, and more – right now – because as we sit here together, you and I, something delicate and precious is dying before our eyes for the simple lack of belief in what it represents.

We need to put our children on our lap and clap like furies.



While the comments have gone, I fear, my main motivation has always been the words of support and honest criticism that readers have so generously taken the time to write. I'd love to continue to hear from you by e-mail. You can reach me at bill at ejectejecteject dot com.


LINER NOTES. Posted by Bill Whittle at 12:47 AM
June 16, 2006.

Hello, faithful, faithful reader! Thank you for continuing to check back, against all common sense. It’s been a long time.

As you probably know by now, I prefer not to get paid by the word, or the page, but by the pound. That said, I’ll try to make this brief because there is much work to be done at long last.

I have been meaning to return to these pages for months now – months! Everything I have written here so far has just shot out of me like a fighter jet off a carrier deck: one or two 3-4 hour sessions during which I contract a case of the vapors, then next thing I know I’m reading what the Invisible Hand wrote and out the door she goes.

But for months and months now I have been struggling with a single idea, an essay I wanted to call CIVILIZATION, and despite dozens of false starts, I tear it all up the next day because it reads like an okay parody of me. There was so much I wanted to say, so many bases to cover, that it was like drinking from a firehose – no fun.
Finally, this morning, after another hacking attempt last night, it finally hit me what I was doing wrong. I was trying to avoid delving into areas I had planned to save for later, but I needed these foundations to make the case, and it was going to turn into a 400 page essay. But 400 pages is not an essay. 400 pages is a book.
Aha!

So, here is the plan: within 24 hours I will post the introductory chapter to a new book called AN AMERICAN CIVILIZATION. Then, over the next several weeks, I will post a series of chapters, looking at the various building blocks of such a civilization. Then, when those have been written, I will write that final chapter – Civilization – that ties it all together, and in doing so I cut the Gordian knot that has kept me flummoxed al these long months.

I will soon be on hiatus from my day job, and have about three weeks more work to do between now and the first week in September. I would like the have an entire book finished by then. And, unlike SILENT AMERICA, which is collection of disparate essays, this is an actual book-worthy idea, with each chapter building on the last and setting up the next.

I have been thinking about this for almost a year now, and I am loaded, cocked, sighted and my finger is inside the trigger guard. And I can tell you that a few moments after I had that revelation on the way to work this morning, I have felt like a genii let out of a long and painful isolation.

I can now turn that firehose outward and try my best to put out some of the fires that distress us all. Also during these next few months, I will put out a hardcover edition of SILENT AMERICA, fully proofed, with better formatting, a table of contents (Uptown!) and which will also include SANCTUARY and TRIBES, which did not get to the station in time to catch the paperback.

Of course, right now these are just words, and I’ve made assurances before. So let’s judge by actions and not words. But sometimes, you have to let a field lie fallow for a while or else the next crop is thin and reedy. Fortunately, there has been so much manure slung around this past year that I hope that fertility of ideas will not be too much of a problem.

But of course, you will be the judge of that, not me. And that’s as it should be.
Thanks for continuing to check in during this long absence. I hope that you will find the delay worthwhile. In any event, we will know soon enough.
Back with more later tonight.

Bill@ejectejecteject.com.

Islam sucks.

Warning! Imam! Keep away from children, women, men and pets!



Dear sports, here's an old favourite from Wednesday 28 November 2007. Go to the original to dig the swinging comments of the time.





From the great Roger Kimball: ‘Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. Their credo: “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope”.

I have a screech owl that I’ve called Mohammad. I also have a baboon and a chimpanzee named Mohammad. I have a dozen lovable newts, a hamster, a gnu, three aardvarks, a poodle, two mice, a rattlesnake and a sloth all named Mohammad. I also have a centipede, a slug, a blow fish, a family of Sea Monkeys and a Petri dish of bacteria all named Mohammad. I can say "Hey Mohammad!" and they all appear at once, alighting in photogenic pose.

The borderline insane and those that have rabidly leapt over that border of the mind, say that Mohammad is all. All lies? All insane? All over? All rubbish? All washed up? Allman Brothers? All I want to do is boogie?

Gee, the fact is sports, there’s absolutely no need to try to er, 'understand’ Islam, or come to an ‘accommodation’ with Mohammad and the Krazy Koran etc. Nope, can’t be done. Not without signing your own death warrant! None of that irrational and suicidal PC floop. Islam or Islamism, has exacly NOTHING to offer the great Western Canon whatsoever, except for the abyss.

Come on, let’s be honest. With Islam, there’s always the clearly implied threat of violence, isn’t there? Yep, there are millions and millions of all kinds of wonderful, decent and regular Muslims. But do just observe how these and the many Muslim dissident's, feminist's, journalist's, intellectual's and activist's etc, etc in the Muslim world and the West, are largely ignored, insulted and virtually completely unsupported by the Western Left intelligentia. It's empirical, baby.

Name one Left figure who supports a single courageous Iraqi Muslim in their struggle for normality? I'd love to ask such illiberal Leftards what kind of Iraq, the people there should have. Their logic would mean either putting or allowing the Baathist Party back into power, or any dominant group of killers, as long as they er, just love to hate America.

So naturally, such Muslim's really ain't generally the one's in charge in most places I'm afraid, and in the way that counts, are they? Power in such peculiar states, coming largely out of the oil fed barrel of a gun and the pages of the Koran, so to speak.

And er, many earnest PC folks seem to forget that Islam entirely sucks for million's of Muslim's too, and to the point of death. Hey, maybe that sucks!

When in Riyadh and Iran etc, one must do as Islamists do, which is "Destroy Infidels!" One thing though, under any circumstances, don’t ever "misunderstand" Islam. Your head may come off and you can just explode.

So this is what we should all do. Some of the ways I’ve found to utilise Mohammad, the all purpose 7th Century paedophile, rapist, madman, mass murdering lice ridden Jew hating bandit, is simply in conversation, to replace random or key words with Mohammad and so on. Everyone knows what you mean, as when one says "Frankly, Islam scares the Hell out of me".

And yet, we can still get some of the few laughs available out of the old bastard freak and the rest of the axis of medieval regards the krazy Koran, and as Christopher Hitchens perhaps correctly called it, "the filth of Islam". I’ve also thrown in some swingin’ bumper stickers. Try these. Remember, if Islamism goes global with the help of PC Left liberal socialism, we're all dead anyway or will wish we were. Especially the female half of the population. Still, gawd, it's a larf, innit, eh?


Islam. The Religion of Peace...or else!

Hey! Did somebody just Mohammad?

Frankly my dear, I don’t give a Koran.

Oh John! Oh Mohammad!

Oh God! I think I’m going to Mohammad!

Removes most bathroom Mohammad’s with a single wipe!

Removes even the most stubborn Mohammad’s in the wash!

I think we may have to put Mother into a home. She’s becoming more Mohammad everyday.

I’m afraid your tests are positive Mr Kowalski. You have Mohammad.

Sir! I said drop the Koran and move away from the nuclear device, now!

Your towel, sir.

In all my years of medical and psychiatric practice, I’ve never seen a Mohammad like it.

Islam? No, it’s beef!

Islam treats women like a precious gift. That’s why they wrap them up.

Larry, Mohammad and Curly.

Hey Mo! Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!

And then he says, ‘you should have seen the other Mohammad!’

Hey Mohammad! Here boy!

All units respond to a Mohammad at 12th and Vine. Suspect is armed, has a history of psychological illness and is considered extremely dangerous.

In zis experiment I vill transfer zer brain of zis Mohammad into zer brain of zis chicken!

Of course I love you but we’re so different. You’re just way too Mohammad!

It looks like Mohammad is going for the triple play.

Hey Dude, like that Mohammad is like totally radical!

Early behead and early to lies, makes Mohammad unhinged wacky and despised.

Hey Kor-an, you’re the girl for me.

My, my, my, my, my, my, my, my Mohammad!

My Mother caught me having a Mohammad.

Hey, that’s like, totally Islam!

Adventurous cross dresser wishes to meet midget acrobat for casual fun times. Must be into Mohammad.

Oh, Mr President! I'll never get your Dhimmi stains out of my new dress!

Hey buddy. Interested in half an hour with a really hot little Mohammad?

I woke up this mornin’ and got myself Mohammad!

Are you some kind of Mohammad?

They Came From Outer The Koran!

I Was A Teenage Mohammad!

I never had sexual relations with that Mohammad.

I am not a Mohammad!

Dhimmi, Dhimmi coco pop!

The Australian Labour Party stands for all Mohammad's.

Read my lips. No more Mohammad's.

That curry gave me terrible Sharia.

Islam ah bad?

Life is but a dream...kaboom, kaboom!

Congress has just outlawed Islam. We commence bombing of Mecca in five minutes.

Whoh oh Black Betty, Ramadan. Damn things gone wild. Ramadan.

I just met a girl called Sharia.

Bewitched, bothered and beheaded am I.

In the merry, merry month of Ramadan.

A full Burqa looks like Gort the robot in drag.

Islamic puzzle book. Join the heads!

It looks like Mohammad is going for the red in the side pocket.

Now Mohammad, I just want you to relax and close your eyes and tell me, why do you hate everyone’s Mother?

That’s Mohammad ahead by two points.

Crazier than an Imam.

After washing thoroughly, please place all Mohammad’s in the bin provided.

I’ll have the Mohammad and eggs and a coffee, thanks.

I’ve been seeing another Mohammad, and we’re in love!

How could you spend all our savings on a Mohammad!

Hey man, this is Grade A Mohammad!

I’m sorry. We just sold our last Mohammad. We’re expecting more by Thursday at the latest.

They tried to tell us we were Mohammad.

Here’s looking at you, Mohammad.

Ramadan a ding dong.

Iraq me baby, all night long.

Hey, I’m gonna Mecca summa spaghetti!

Try ‘New’ Mohammad! Now with five times more Jihad!

Is your hair dry, lifeless and hard to Mohammad?

There is nothing to fear but Islam itself.

This is a day that will live in Islam, see.

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for Dhimmitude.

The truth about Islam? You can’t handle the truth!

Israel is real. Islam is unreal.

Islam gave me cancer!

'Harem Jane' Fonda. 'Haram Jane' Fonda. 'Annoy Jane' Fonda!

Islamism. It’s the crème de’ la crude.

Sayet again.

This is the logical end of a stupid is as stupid does life of naturally Marxist diseased Leftard Liberalism. Ending up as an incredibly embarrassing, never to be cool, laughably useless and ineffective morally inverted intellectual bankrupt and mental asylum groomed spastic. A kind of permanent poo-poo pen playing infant.

In the wonderful world of the Left Liberal Radical, one can inevitably "progress" to believing that inflating ones scrotum means anything beyond being mentally ill and having balls made entirely of air.

[Via the great and vast resources of the Zombietime Hall of Shame.]




Dear sports, I’m sure many who are truly hip are hip to Evan Sayet and his outstanding speech How Liberals Think given at the Heritage Foundation. He describes perfectly the peculiar and distinctively narrow mechanical paradigm of Left Liberalism as it is, and has been ever thus really. So I’ve posted the entire available transcript and the video link as above.

It's a Hell of a speech. And yeah, there are some aspects I may not exactly groove with. For example I really liked Brokeback Mountain! No, really. Especially the clothes and horses. It was a little naff though.

Hey, but for 99.9% of the How Liberals Think thang, Sayet is so shockingly and sadly on the money.

Here’s a game to play with a Left luvvie. If by some miracle one of 'em even pretends to have watched Evan's little masterpiece, ask a question regarding several actual points from throughout the vid. The average tinfoilhat won’t be able to stay on subject or answer a single point, I betcha. All that crazy subject change and sodden auto screaming of juvenile epithets and absurd attribution is the way of the Leftard.

Gotta admit though, I do love a nice epithet myself, but only the rude and insulting ones.

“Now showing. The Way of the Leftard. Tim Robbins stars as Butterboy, a rich phony from Hollywood courageously risking nothing as he screeches the most clichéd hyperbole at a Democratic government with zero chance of those authorities ever doing anything whatsoever in retaliation ever.

In the heartbreaking finale, Tim not only keeps his millions of dollars and incredible privileges courtesy of the fantasy life he leads supported entirely by the system he despises, but makes even millions of dollars more. Sean Penn stars as the evil Mastermind Han the Chavez blowing man, a fraudulent bastard so intellectually venal and morally bankrupt, that he's actually Jane Fonda”.

Notice how Leftooties go into the most banal and embarrassing chants at the drop of a clichéd protest placard or paper mache figurine? And always with the same meagre list of words and phrases for every and any occasion. Such an imprisoned bonce must echo with one long chant of mindless and meaningless idiocy.

It's actually intellectual and moral cowardice.

The saviour of the worlds downtrodden repeat the same useless, cheap mediocrities and then like a Berkeley Don Quixote, aim them at the vast endless range of life’s challenges and problems and seriously expects an effective and positive result. Go figure.

They are in short, the most spoiled of brats and tantrum prone children. But as Left Luvvies are generally adults, that makes them not only creepy, grossly and bizarrely immature, but the lifetime victims of some kind of mass mental and personality disorder. Apart from that, they're quite wonderful!

It’s ain't really adult, healthy, normal, balanced or hey, sustainable to be so incompetent on so many levels, innit? From dress sense to basic thinking ability, to practical responsibility, personal behaviour and [any] perception of reality. Self-reflection and logical goals are not a big thing for the poor dears either, eh? Which is odd for such extreme and natural narcissists.

Thank God I don't have any faults! But then, I'm neither dangerous nor suicidal.

The perfect bookend to Evan’s great talk is the pictorial evidence of the permanent five year old child tantrum that so defines the Left Liberal mindless set photographed and documented in such startling and living colour at Zombietime. Of course, Dr Sanity, the Peoples Cube and Dissect Left among others, adds the required literary analysis. So here's the transcript with the introduction too, folks.


May 10, 2007. Regurgitating the Apple: How Modern Liberals "Think" by Evan Sayet.

Heritage Lecture #1020 Delivered on March 5, 2007.

Becky Norton Dunlop: The Heritage Foundation has a very fine reputation for excellent research and writing on policy issues that are facing our nation and our world, focusing on Capitol Hill. One of the things that we have talked about in some of our work and with some of our speakers is the challenge that we face in our culture.

So we've decided to do something about that in this year of 2007, and what we've decided to do about it in the External Relations Department is to bring some people to our podium who have worked in the entertainment world: people who have a profession that is recognized and well received but come from a perspective on the culture that doesn't get widespread coverage, let's say, in today's mainstream media.

We aim to change that. We think some of the people and some of the productions that we're going to be bringing to Heritage in 2007 are ones that more and more people should see and hear and messages from people that need to be told to the mainstream, and you're going to hear them first here at The Heritage Foundation.

Evan Sayet has written and/or produced in virtually every medium there is. He started out as a stand-up comic. Very few are successful, but Evan has been suc¬cessful at that. He was quickly spotted by David Letterman and offered a spot on a special episode featuring young talent. He then moved into writing, and he was an integral part of the team that made the "Arsenio Hall Show" the first late-night program in 30 years to give the "Tonight Show" a run for its money.

Then he moved to a very interesting assignment called "Politically Incorrect" with Bill Maher. After that, Evan wrote and produced the highest-rated special in the Learning Channel's history, "The 70's: From Bellbottoms to Boogie Shoes." He perfected the book for a musical comedy, wrote a screenplay optioned by Penny Marshall, and even tried his hand at game shows as the original writer of the cult classic, "Win Ben Stein's Money."

The latest twist in Evan's career came during the recent presidential elections when he turned his attention and skills toward convincing others of the greatness of America and the need to reelect President Bush and to stay the course in the Middle East. In a short time, Evan was made the communications director for Los Angeles for President Bush. He wrote a number of articles about this for major conservative outlets and later was asked to offer weekly commentary on KMJ Radio. He also began delivering the lecture that he's going to be deliver¬ing to us today.

He now is among Los Angeles's most in-demand speakers, a political pundit recognized by Dennis Prager as brilliant for his take on the unique power of the Judeo-Christian culture and singled out by Rush Limbaugh for his explanation of why Liberals lie. Evan is signed with one of the country's top speakers bureaus and has recently been booked at the highly prestigious Lincoln Club, whose monthly roster of speakers has included people such as Ken Starr, former U.S. Treasurer Rosario Marin, and the Consul General of Israel.

At around that same time, Evan returned to his first love, stand-up comedy, only now with a decidedly conservative twist. He has been the headliner of a night of conservative comedy called "Right to Laugh" and is now planning a series of one-nighters around the country. He recently appeared at the Conservative Political Action Conference and was well received by his audience on a night when there were many luminaries on the stage. He will soon produce his first CD, "Funny, You Don't Look Conservative."

Becky Norton Dunlop is Vice President for External Relations at The Heritage Foundation.


Evan Sayet: I call myself a 9/13 Republican. I grew up a liberal New York Jew; you don't get much more liberal than that, although it was lower-case "l," not what's considered Liberal today. I graduated from high school knowing only one thing about politics: that Democrats are good and Republicans are evil.

I tell a story. It's not a true story, but it helps crystallize my thinking that brought me to become a conservative. I say: Imagine being in a restaurant with an old friend, and you're catching up, and suddenly he blurts out, "I hate my wife."

You chuckle to yourself because he says it every time you're together, and you know he doesn't hate his wife; they've been together for 35 years. He loves his daughters, and they're just like her. No, he doesn't hate his wife.

So you're having dinner, and you look out the window and spot his wife, and she's being beaten up right outside the restaurant. You grab your friend and say, "Come on, let's help her. Let's help your wife," and he says, "Nah, I'm sure she deserves it." At that moment, it dawns on you: He really does hate his wife.

That's what 9/11 was to me. For years and years I'd hear my friends from the Left say how evil and horrible and racist and imperialistic and oppressive America is, and I'd chuckle to myself and think, "Oh, they always say that; they love America." Then on 9/11, we were beaten up, and when I grabbed them by the collar, and I said, "Come on, let's help her. Let's help America," and they said, "Nah, she deserves it."

At that moment, I realized: They really do hate America. And that began me on what's now a five-plus-year quest to try to understand the mindset. How could you possibly live in the freest nation in the history of the world and see only oppression? How could you live in the least imperialist power in human history and see us as the ultimate in imperialism? How could you live in the least bigoted nation in human history and, as Joe Biden said, "see racism lurking in every dark shadow"?

Over the next five years, what I came to think through, what I came to learn, what I came to find in conversations and studying, listening, and reading became this talk and very soon will be the book Regurgitating the Apple: How Modern Liberals "Think."

I assume that just about everybody in this room agrees that the Democrats are wrong on just about every issue. Well, I'm here to propose to you that it's not "just about" every issue; it's quite literally every issue. And it's not just wrong; it's as wrong as wrong can be; it's 180 degrees from right; it is diametrically opposed to that which is good, right, and successful.

What I discovered is that this is not an accident. This is part of a philosophy that now dominates the whole of Western Europe and the Democratic Party today. I, like some others, call it Modern Liberalism. The Modern Liberal will invariably side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success.

Give the Modern Liberal the choice between Saddam Hussein and the United States, and he will not only side with Saddam Hussein; he will slander America and Americans in order to do so. Give him the choice between the vicious mass murderer corrupt terrorist dictator Yasser Arafat and the tiny and wonderful democracy of Israel, and he will plagiarize maps, forge documents, engage in blood libels, as did our former President Jimmy Carter, to side with the terrorist organizations and to attack the tiny democracy of Israel.

It's not just foreign policy; it's every policy. Given the choice between promoting teenage abstinence and teenage promiscuity, and believe me, I know this from my hometown of Hollywood, they will use their movies, their TV shows, their songs, even the schools to promote teenage promiscuity as if it's cool: like the movie American Pie, in which you are a loser unless you've had sex with your best friend's mother while you're still a child.

Conversely, NARAL, a pro-abortion group masquerading as a pro-choice group, will hold a fund-raiser called "‘F' Abstinence." (And it's not just "F." It's the entire word, because promoting vulgarity is part of their agenda.)

So the question becomes: Why? How do they think they're making a better world?

The first thing that comes into your mind when trying to under¬stand, as I've so desperately tried to understand, is that if they side always with evil, then they must be evil. But we have a problem with that, don't we? We all know too many people who fit this category but who aren't evil: many of my lifelong friends, the people I grew up with, relatives, close relatives.

If they're not evil, then the next place your mind goes is that they must just be incredibly stupid. They don't mean to always side with evil, the failed and wrong; they just don't know what they're doing. But we have a problem with this as well. You can't say Bill Maher (my old boss) is a stupid man.

You can't say Ward Churchill is a stupid man. You can't say all these academics are stupid people. Frankly, if it were just stupidity, they'd be right more often.

What's the expression? "Even a broken clock is right twice a day," or "Even a blind squirrel finds an acorn now and again."

But if they're not stupid and they're not evil, what's their plan? How do they think they're making a better world by siding with Saddam Hussein, by keeping his rape and torture rooms open, by seeking the destruction of a democracy of Jews? I don't know if you've seen the list going around the Inter¬net of all the Nobel Prize-winning scientists from this tiny state of Israel. How do they think they're making a better world by promoting to children behaviors that are inappropriate and cause diseases and unwanted pregnancies and ruin people's lives? How do they think they're making a better world?

What I discovered is that the Modern Liberal looks back on 50,000 years, 100,000 years of human civilization, and knows only one thing for sure: that none of the ideas that mankind has come up with--none of the religions, none of the philosophies, none of the ideologies, none of the forms of government--have succeeded in creating a world devoid of war, poverty, crime, and injustice. So they're convinced that since all of these ideas of man have proved to be wrong, the real cause of war, poverty, crime, and injustice must be found--can only be found--in the attempt to be right.

If nobody ever thought they were right, what would we disagree about? If we didn't disagree, surely we wouldn't fight. If we didn't fight, of course we wouldn't go to war. Without war, there would be no poverty; without poverty, there would be no crime; without crime, there would be no injustice. It's a utopian vision, and all that's required to usher in this utopia is the rejection of all fact, reason, evidence, logic, truth, morality, and decency--all the tools that you and I use in our attempts to be better people, to make the world more right by trying to be right, by siding with right, by recognizing what is right and moving toward it.

When this first started to dawn on me, I would question my Liberal friends--and believe me, there were plenty of them in Hollywood. The thing about Hollywood is that it is overwhelmingly Liberal: upper-case "L," not lower-case "l." There are a lot more of us conservatives than you would suspect, but they are afraid. It's hard to come out because what's so Orwellian--and virtually everything about this philosophy is Orwellian--is that the Liberals are as illiberal as you can imagine.

As much as they scream "McCarthyism," there is a "graylist" there that sees people not get hired because they don't toe the Leftist line.

What you have is people who think that the best way to eliminate rational thought, the best way to eliminate the attempt to be right, is to work always to prove that right isn't right and to prove that wrong isn't wrong. You see this in John Lennon's song "Imagine": "Imagine there's no countries." Not imagine great countries, not imagine defeat the Nazis, but imagine no religions, and the key line is imagine a time when anything and everything that mankind values is devalued to the point where there's nothing left to kill or die for.

Obviously, this is not going to happen overnight. There are still going to be religions, but they are going to do their best to denigrate them. There are still going to be countries, but they will do what they can to give our national sovereignty to one-world bodies.

In the meantime, everything that they teach in our schools, everything they make into movies, the messages of the movies, the TV shows, the newspaper stories that they pick and how they spin them have but one criterion for truth, beauty, honesty, etc., and that is: Does it tear down what is good and elevate what is evil? Does it tear down what is right and elevate what is wrong? Does it tear down the behaviors that lead to success and elevate the ones that lead to failure so that there is nothing left to believe in?

You might recognize this as the paradigm and the purpose of one of the most successful Liberal motion pictures of all time, Fahrenheit 9/11. There's nobody who believes Michael Moore's Fahrenheit 9/11 was an honest attempt to portray the real events of that horrific day and its aftermath.

Every¬body knows that Michael Moore is a Leftist and that it was a propaganda film in which the facts were cherry-picked, the evidence manipulated, the nar¬rative near-lunatic, all for one purpose. The ques¬tion that we were debating at the time was, "Should we go to war against the Iraqi government, against Saddam Hussein?" So he used all the tricks and manipulations and lies that he could to show that America isn't that good, that America isn't worth fighting for, that Saddam Hussein isn't that evil and not worth fighting against, for the purpose of undermining our efforts to go to war.

Again, there is quite literally nothing in Hollywood, in the newspapers, in our schools that does not have this as its sole criterion. For example, there is no journalistic standard by which the misdeeds of a handful of night guards at an obscure prison for terrorists--misdeeds in which nobody was killed and nobody was seriously hurt--ought to be a front-page story in The New York Times.

Not for a single day. Yet, for 44 straight days, this non-story was a front-page story in The New York Times. Why? Because while it met no journalistic standard, it met the one and only Modern Liberal standard: "You think America's good? We found something that's going to make you not believe that any longer. You think that the Islamic fascists are bad? No, no, no, this is why they do it. No wonder they fly airplanes into our buildings."

And that's just one of so many other examples. There was no journalistic standard by which Newsweek printed the story of Korans being flushed down the toilet. Not only was it a bogus story, it never happened--it was an impossible story. Think about it: Can you flush a book down the toilet? Even a five-year-old would know that you can't flush a book down the toilet; you can't fit a square peg into a round hole. So why did Newsweek run a story that was not only bogus, but that failed to meet even the most obvious logic? Because nothing matters to them. There is no standard, because a standard would require them to say something is better than something else, which goes against this entire philosophy. It met the one and only criterion of truth to Newsweek, which was that it attacked America and justified the Islamic fascist terrorist.

The same thing is true in the art world. There is no artistic standard, no aesthetic criterion by which-- forgive me--a jar of urine with a cross in it is beauti¬ful. There is no aesthetic criterion by which the cura¬tors of the museum said, "Take down the Monet and put up the urine," but it met the one and only stan¬dard of art that exists to the Modern Liberal.

Similarly, the movies last year met no criterion of storytelling and no criterion of cinematography. The five nominees for Best Picture met one criterion. Brokeback Mountain said heterosexual marriage isn't that important; go be a homosexual if you choose. Munich said there is no difference between the terrorists and the people who stop them from murdering again. And if you look at the other pictures as well, ultimately with Crash winning, Crash said America is this evil, horrible nation where every moment of every day is filled with bigotry and racism.

There truly is no standard, no criterion for truth, beauty, justice, or anything else amongst the Modern Liberals, the dominant force in today's Demo¬cratic Party: not all Democrats, but those who will mindlessly accept without question, without doubt, that of course we went into Iraq to steal their oil because that's what America does; no need to even consider any other possibility. Not everyone who voted for John Kerry and who fits that description is aware of the elite's blueprint for utopia, and I don't think some of them would support it if they were.

What the elite have succeeded in doing through the institutions we've allowed them to control--and if we're going to save America, we must take back the schools, the universities, the media, the entertainment industry--is indoctrinating, starting with the very young and going all the way up through college and beyond, starting the first time they turn on "Sesame Street" and "Buster Bunny," going up through the middle years when they're told, "Hey, little boy, if you have a queer eye, you're going to be a cool guy," or, "Hey, little girl, it doesn't matter how cool you are; if you grow up to be a heterosexual married woman, you're going to be a desperate housewife."

So many of the other shows that are on the air show family and marriage and all the things that are traditional and that we recognize as good--shows like "The War at Home" and "Rules of Engagement"--as if it's another battle. They wouldn't allow "Make Room for Daddy" and shows like those because they were not realistic, so instead we now have the Bundys, where the mother and father hate each other and are looking to get as much as they can from each other, and this whole mindset. And it continues on through Ward Churchill's ethnic studies class.

What happens is, they are indoctrinated into what I call a "cult of indiscriminateness." The way the elite does this is by teaching our children, starting with the very young, that rational and moral thought is an act of bigotry; that no matter how sincerely you may seek to gather the facts, no matter how earnestly you may look at the evidence, no matter how disciplined you may try to be in your reasoning, your conclusion is going to be so tainted by your personal bigotries, by your upbringing, by your religion, by the color of your skin, by the nation of your great-great-great-great-great grandfather's birth; that no matter what your conclusion, it is useless.

It is nothing other than the reflection of your bigotries, and the only way to eliminate bigotry is to eliminate rational thought.

There's a brilliant book out there called The Clos¬ing of the American Mind by Professor Allan Bloom. Professor Bloom was trying to figure out in the 1980s why his students were suddenly so stupid, and what he came to was the realization, the recog¬nition, that they'd been raised to believe that indiscriminateness is a moral imperative because its opposite is the evil of having discriminated. I paraphrase this in my own works: "In order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate."

I'll give you an example. At the airports, in order not to discriminate, we have to intentionally make ourselves stupid. We have to pretend we don't know things we do know, and we have to pretend that the next person who is likely to blow up an airplane is as much the 87-year-old Swedish great-great-grand¬mother as those four 27-year-old imams newly arrived from Syria screaming "Allahu Akbar!" just before they board the plane. In order to eliminate discrimination, the Modern Liberal has opted to become utterly indiscriminate.

The problem is, of course, that the ability to dis¬criminate, to thoughtfully choose the better of the available options--as in "she's a discriminating shopper"--is the essence of rational thought; thus, the whole of Western Europe and today's Democratic Party, dominated as it is by this philosophy, rejects rational thought as a hate crime.

So what you're left with after 10, 12, 14, 20 years in the Leftist indoctrination centers that our schools have become are citizens of voting age who are utterly unwilling and incapable of critically judging the merits of the positions they hold and have held unquestioned since they were five years old and first entered the Leftist indoctrination process.

There was a book that came out at just about the same time as Professor Bloom's that in some ways even better describes and explains the mindset of the Modern Liberal. It was Robert Fulghum's All I Really Need to Know I Learned in Kindergarten, and it reads like the bible of Modern Liberalism and the playbook of Democratic Party policy.

The sentence fragment "Don't hit," which is one of the lessons that Fulghum refers to, has morphed into an entire sentence now that they're adults: "War is not the answer." But they don't really need to know anything, because even though they know about Neville Chamberlain and what happens if you appease evil, they don't really need to know it because knowing it or not knowing it would not have changed the position they have now and have held unquestioned since they were five.

When I was five years old, I used to go around the neighborhood trick-or-treating with my friends on Halloween, and we'd have in one hand a bag for candy and in the other hand a little box with a slit on top for nickels and dimes and pennies for UNICEF, because at five years old, the United Nations is a terrific thing: "Don't hit, talk." Another lesson from Robert Fulghum is "Share everything." Well, here, we'll share power; we'll share our wealth; we'll pay for the United Nations. Let's talk things out. What a lovely, wonderful thing.

Then you turn 10, 15, 20, and you learn some things about the United Nations that change your opinion. You learn about the corruption. You learn about the anti-Semitism, that they ran away from the genocide in Rwanda, have done nothing about the Sudanese genocide--in fact, made the Sudanese members of the Human Rights Commission while they were committing this genocide!

You and I change our position because these are things we really need to know, yet the Modern Liberal will maintain their five-year-old's position, their belief that the United Nations is this great, wonderful thing, and completely ignore everything they've learned since.

There was a song that came out at about this time called "Goodbye Stranger" by a group called Super¬tramp--because, you know, being a "tramp" is super! In it, this guy and this girl shack up together for a couple weeks, and apparently things are pretty wonderful until she says something like, "Honey, we've run out of food. Why don't you go to the supermarket, pick up some things, and then we can do this for another week or two?" He says, "I should go shopping? No, no, that's not my paradise. I'm leaving." And as he's walking out the door, he says to her, "Now, I believe that what you say is the undisputed truth, but I have to see things my own way just to keep me in my youth."

That is so much the mindset of the Modern Lib¬erals. It's not that they are not aware of all the things that we're aware of; it's that they need to reject them in order to remain in this five-year-old's utopia that they've been told is the only hope for mankind: a mindless indiscriminateness.

So what you're left with is not really adults, but citizens of voting age who cannot judge their own positions but are virulently antagonistic to any posi¬tion other than their own. Why? Because when you've been brought up to believe that indiscriminateness is a moral imperative, any position other than their own must have been arrived at through the employment of discrimination. This is why Bush is Hitler; this is why Reagan is Hitler; this is why Giuliani is Hitler.

How is Rudolph Giuliani like Hitler to a thinking person? In one way: Hitler discriminated against the Jews; Giuliani discriminated against the crack-addicted prostitutes mugging people in Times Square. Hitler discriminated against the Catholics; Giuliani discriminated against the criminal over¬lords.

Hitler discriminated against the gypsies; Giuliani discriminated against the terrorists on 9/11 and beyond. In other words, any form of discrimi¬nation is wrong.

The Modern Liberals know that theirs is a position arrived at through the moral imperative of indiscriminateness; therefore, any position other than their own must have been arrived at through the employment of discrimination.

So this makes you not just wrong on your issues and your stances. They don't even think about your issues and your stances. They don't have to. Even if they were willing to, even if they were able to, they don't need to. Would you sit and contemplate Hitler's Social Security policy? No, you would fight Hitler.

So what you're left with is, after 10, 12, 14, 20 years in these indoctrination centers--and it's not a coincidence that the longer you stay in the indoctri¬nation process, the more morally inverted you become, so that to become head of the Ethnic Studies Department, you have to argue that the Islamic fascist terrorists are the good guys and the victims of 9/11 were all little Eichmanns--is people who quite literally cannot differentiate between good and evil, right and wrong, better and worse.

But indiscriminateness of thought does not lead to indiscriminateness of policy. Indiscriminateness of thought invariably leads the Modern Liberal to side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success. Why? Because in a world where you are indiscriminate, where no behavior is to be deemed better or worse than any other, your expectation is that all behavior should lead to equally good out¬comes.

When, in the real world, different behaviors lead to different outcomes, you and I know why-- because we think. We know why communities that promote teenage promiscuity tend to fail at a greater rate than communities that promote teenage abstinence: Teenage promiscuity and teenage abstinence are not the same behaviors. Teenage abstinence is a better behavior.

Forget the moral component for a moment; let's just talk practicalities. If your boy's out messing around, he's not home reading a book. If your daughter's down at the abortion mill again, she's not at the library studying for the SATs. If your son's in a hospital bed somewhere dying of AIDS, he's not putting together his five-year plan.

You and I recognize why communities that pro¬mote teenage abstinence do better than those that promote teenage promiscuity in their music, in their movies, in the schools. But to the Modern Liberal who cannot make that judgment--must not make that judgment--that would be discriminating. They have no explanation. Therefore, the only explana¬tion for success has to be that somehow success has cheated.

Success, simply by its existence, is proof positive to the Modern Liberal of some kind of chicanery and likely bigotry. Failure, simply by its existence--no other evidence needed, just the fact that it has failed--is enough proof to them that failure has been victimized.

So the mindless foot soldier, which is what I call the non-elite, will support the elite's blueprint for utopia, will side with evil over good, wrong over right, and the behaviors that lead to failure over those that lead to success, out of a sense of justice. As I said at the beginning, they're not evil. It's just a mindless acceptance without any true Socratic desire to talk about the real consequences. It's meaningless to them, and it's why John Lennon said utopia was all the people living for today.

By the way, it's not a coincidence that those who live for today now have so much debt. What is debt? It's the failure to repay a promise from yesterday. And they vote themselves nothing but more and more entitlements, which is what? Stuff for me. I'll worry about who pays for it later.

The same is true of good and evil. Since nothing can deemed good, nothing can be deemed evil. That which society does recognize as good must be the beneficiary of some sort of prejudice. That which society recognizes as evil must be the victim of that prejudice.

So, again, the mindless foot soldier will invariably side with whatever policy, mindlessly accept whatever policy seeks to tear down what is good--America, Israel, Wal-Mart--and elevate what is evil until everything meets in the middle and there is nothing left to fight about.

Take an issue in the news and think like a Mod¬ern Liberal, and you will see how, once you've been indoctrinated into this mindset, there is no other choice. Remember, I said it was inevitable. Once you belong to this cult of indiscriminateness, there is no other conclusion you can come to than that good is evil and that evil is the victim of good.

We all know it's official policy at the Leftist media outlets to never call Islamic Jihad, al-Qaeda, Hezbol¬lah, Hamas, Harakat ul-Mujahidin, or any of the oth¬er Islamic fascist terrorist groups around the world "terrorists," and you know why. In fact, it's even in official memos to reporters ordering them not to use the appropriate word. That reason is that "one man's terrorist is another man's freedom fighter. Who are we to employ critical, rational judgment?"

But, as a very minimum standard, can't we at least agree that in order to be called a "freedom fighter," you have to be fighting for freedom? We know what Osama bin Laden is fighting for; he's told us. It's not freedom; it's an oppressive theocracy in which women are covered from head to toe and beaten if their ankles become exposed, and unless we all change to his religion, we are considered the offspring of pigs and monkeys to be decapitated. People like Cindy Sheehan and Michael Moore will call Osama bin Laden a freedom fighter because being indiscriminate quite literally leaves them unable to tell the difference between freedom and having your head hacked off. That's how sick this mentality is.

So, if The New York Times and CNN and News¬week and the rest of the leftist media outlets are right and there is no objective difference between the ter¬rorist and the freedom fighter, why is it that you and I teach our children that George Washington is a hero and Yasser Arafat and Saddam Hussein are villains? You and I know why because we think.

George Washington risked his personal fortune to personally lead his troops into battle: battles fought nobly against other uniformed warriors for the purpose of creating the freest nation in the history of the world. Pretty noble, pretty heroic stuff. Yasser Arafat, on the other hand, stole his people's money, sent 14-year-olds out to fight his battles: battles fought against kids and women and civilians in pizza parlors and Passover ceremonies, all for the purpose of maintaining his corrupt dictatorship. Pretty villainous stuff.

But to the folks at The New York Times, there is no objective difference between the terrorist and the freedom fighter. So why do we teach our children that George Washington is a hero? The only possible explanation is that he is a white Christian of Euro-pean descent. If there is no difference between the behaviors of the freedom fighters and the terrorists, then why do we teach that Yasser Arafat and Saddam Hussein are villains? There can be no other rea¬son than they are darker-skinned Muslims of Middle Eastern birth.

So when push comes to shove and after 18 Unit¬ed Nations resolutions and 10 years of having our airplanes shot at in direct violation of our very clear agreements, after Saddam Hussein had invaded Iran and invaded Kuwait, bombed Saudi Arabia and bombed Israel, committed atrocities against the Kurds in the North and was committing genocide against the Marsh Arabs in the South, we finally, reluctantly go to war to liberate those poor people. You and I know why because we think: because we make critical, rational, moral judgments.

But to the Modern Liberal, to the mindless, to those who cannot discriminate between these behaviors, the only possible explanation for us going to war is some nefarious cause: because we're evil and Saddam Hussein, therefore, is a victim. So they will rush there, as we've seen, and act as human shields to protect his rape rooms and his torture chambers because they won't judge rape rooms and torture chambers, for that requires critical and moral judgment.

And if you listened to the chants of the mindless minions as they marched down the streets in their anti-America rallies, which the forged document users and the Leftist press euphemistically called "anti-war rallies," you could hear their chant: "One, two, three, four, we don't want your racist war." What race, exactly, comprises Iraq? What are they talking about? They don't know. It's not a factual statement; it's not an accurate statement. Didn't we just recently go to war to protect Muslims in Kuwait? Didn't we bomb the Christians of Europe to protect the Muslims of Europe?

What is this based on? It's based on the reality that once you subscribe to indiscriminateness, anything other than indiscriminateness is the evil of having discriminated.

Questions and Answers.

QUESTION: You repeatedly used the term "Modern Liberal." When you go back in time, how do you view other definitions of "liberal" religiously, as when liberals were called "bleeding hearts" related to Jesus Christ, and in classical intellectual thought? I know a lot of Libertarians today like to call themselves liberal in the classical sense. How do you view Modern Liberalism with past liberalism?

MR. SAYET: Normally I would refer to the dif¬ference between upper-case "L" and lower-case "l." I refer to these people as Modern Liberals because it did come out of what we thought was the liberal tra¬dition but went in a new direction. What they are now is very different from what they were. In fact, Modern Liberalism--upper-case "L" - is about as illiberal a philosophy as we've had in America, and though it's not quite yet gotten as violent as some others have, I fear that it's on its way.

As you go back through time, there was always the sense that we were trying to work toward some¬thing; there was a belief that there was something better than what came before. This Modern Liberalism is nihilism in a lot of ways. They will constantly argue, "question authority, question your government, don't trust your neighbors, don't trust Wal-Mart, everybody's out to get you," but they don't really replace it with anything. So there is nothing to aim for that you can make a judgment whether that's truly a good thing to do.

I think that, more than anything else, Modern Liberalism is characterized by its destructive nature. It tears down the authority of people in the schools, the authority of the old textbooks, the heroism of the people we would look up to and teach our children to look up to, but replaces it with nothing.

QUESTION: Do you have any more commen¬tary on the past liberals? Do you respect liberals in the past?

MR. SAYET: There was always a liberal tradition in America, starting with the Founding Fathers and prior to them. It's very, very, very rare that the major¬ity would cede so many rights and recognize that the rights came to everybody and that they didn't come from the powers here but came from a greater power than ourselves. The power that minorities have in America and have always had in America-- and I include myself as a Jew amongst the minorities--is unprecedented in human history, and that was true liberalism: the fact that it wasn't forced upon people.

The things that are happening now, like losing free speech in our schools, are the opposite of what liberalism was. Some of the same values that were liberal back in the '60s are conservative now. I'll give as an example a color-blind society. That remains a liberal concept; unfortunately, it's not liberal from a Modern Liberal--upper-case "L"--point of view.

QUESTION: Owen Graham, foreign policy intern here at Heritage. I think you've come to the nexus of what we as conservatives confront, because it really is a revolution. As Bloom puts it, it's changing everything from a right society to the privileging of differences and the lack of being capable of making decisions based on principles. The only princi¬ple is that you can't discriminate against anything.

MR. SAYET: Indiscriminateness of thought doesn't just lead to sometimes being right; it actual¬ly is a philosophy that has an inevitable conclusion. Bloom talks about "seeking the good," and that's what we try to do. It doesn't mean we're always right, doesn't mean we always get there, doesn't mean we don't stumble along the way; but without a recognition of good, then how do you progress toward good?

Which puts the lie to the concept that Modern Liberalism is progressive in any fashion. If they have nothing to progress toward, if there is no good, then they are forcing every single generation not only to reinvent the wheel, but to fight every battle we've ever fought to get to this great nation, this great time that we're in.

QUESTION: I thank you, and I hope that you are counseling some of the conservative candidates to bring this up, because it has permeated everything.

MR. SAYET: It's quite literally everything. That's why I didn't hesitate at the beginning to say it is the only standard in Hollywood, the only standard for journalism, the only standard for art, the only stan¬dard for justice.
One of the big canards of Modern Liberalism is this notion of diversity, as if diversity is a virtue. Diversity is not a virtue; diversity is meaningless. Diversity just means "different." Without the critical moral judgment to say, "Yes, it's different and good," you're not only not supporting good, but you are invariably supporting evil.

Our melting pot melted out some of the failed behaviors, some of the lesser behaviors. That's how we became such a terrific nation: by taking the best and leaving aside the rest.

That makes the bad behaviors rare in our society, so to be diverse you have to promote that which is rare. Common sense and conventional wisdom are both rejected for no other reason than that they're common and conventional. So you find, again, the Modern Liberal championing always that which is the worst.

QUESTION: Alan Nichols from Washington Dip¬lomat magazine. If Hillary Clinton were sitting here listening to you, trying to be open to you--assum¬ing she's capable--she would say, "You have a per¬spective, but I also am working toward the good." You say liberals don't work toward the good, but Hillary would say, "I want universal health care because I believe it is best for America's citizens."

MR. SAYET: Absolutely. I really did try to stress at the beginning that I don't necessarily consider them evil. I absolutely believe that they believe that they are working toward "the good." The problem is that you've eliminated critical, rational judgment; you've eliminated the ability to tell the difference between what works and what doesn't work; you're coming from the mindset of a five-year-old.

When I was five years old, the New York World's Fair closed up in my neighborhood, down the street from me, and I insisted that my father buy the monorail that went around the park because I want¬ed to put it up alongside the Long Island Express¬way and ease congestion and pollution because I was a liberal kid. He explained to me in grown-up fashion that we couldn't afford it and, technically, there were problems like getting the rights of way, creating a bureaucracy, etc.

When you have a conversation with a Modern Liberal about health care, there's no doubt that their goal is as good as mine was: curing air pollu¬tion or curing everybody's health problems. But if you don't have the grown-up sense to be able to discuss how, what's the reality, what's the truth, you can't have a conversation where you make the world a better place. It's all fantasy at that point. Again, you're dealing with a five-year-old, so of course she wants to make the world a better place. Very, very few of us don't.

It's a matter of having given up the ability to dis¬criminate: (a) they can't bring it about because it's a childish conversation; and (b) when you have to make the decisions about who gets certain things-- for example, health care, welfare, or illegal aliens-- certain decisions have to be made about who qualifies for it, and when you're just going through indiscriminately giving all these benefits, then you're actually going to be assisting that which is most failed because they're the ones who are going to be most in need.

QUESTION: Global warming and Al Gore?

MR. SAYET: I am convinced that global warm¬ing is not a position they have arrived at through an honest and sincere look at the scientific data and the recognition that these models--look, we don't even trust models of weather three days down the road on the nightly news, but we're going to trust this one for 50 years down the road? I don't think it's an honest attempt to understand global warming.

In one fell swoop, you can turn America from the greatest nation in the history of the world--our pro¬ductivity feeds the world--into the most evil nation in the history of the world. The idea that we're destroying the world is accepted more because it's an attack on America as evil polluters than it is because it's scientifically supported.

QUESTION: Since you're here from Hollywood, let's talk about the future. There are conservatives in Hollywood; they just don't want to put their heads out of the hole in the ground. Where do you see us getting to the tipping point, or where can we get along the road of retaking?

MR. SAYET: Let me tie those two questions together very quickly. One of the things that conser¬vatives recognize is that the answer to problems is progress, and fortunately, technological progress has seen the conservatives find alternative methods.

Back in the studio day, you needed to work at the studio, and there was no place else to go; but now you have a Mel Gibson who can find unique ways of distributing and promoting, and there's the Liberty Film Festival that my friends run and whatnot. I am able to promote my shows via the Internet and through all kinds of technologies that would have made it impossible just five or seven or ten years ago. So as more and more channels come on cable, you're going to have more and more opportunities for unique voices, and because we are so incredibly right, they find us.

QUESTION: Can you talk about the term "pro¬gressivism," how that sort of replaced liberalism in a lot of ways as the new way they talk about them¬selves and what it means to be a progressive?

MR. SAYET: What I find interesting is how often what the Liberal claims about himself is exactly the opposite of what the truth is. Chris Matthews has this show called "Hardball," as if the title is going to tell us what the show really is when it's really quite the opposite.

They've come to recognize that people recognize Liberalism in its modern form as the pol¬icies that have failed our schools, the policies that have failed us as a nation, the policies that have done so little to help the black community to get out of the rut that it's been in for the last 40 years in some ways--and that it is a pejorative.

It's funny, because the Liberals very much recognize themselves. I remember watching "Hannity & Colmes," and Sean Hannity said of Nancy Pelosi that she's a San Francisco liberal, and immediately Alan Colmes yelled at him that he was trying to demonize her. How do you demonize someone by stating the facts?

So suddenly they decide, "Okay, people have caught onto us about Liberalism; now let's call ourselves progressive. We won't be progressive in the slightest. It's just a name. It's just an advertising slogan."

Three Stooges refuse to recognise the truth of Islam even if it brings down the Westgate Bridge.

Herald Sun journalist Keith Moor, Victorian Police Commissioner Christine Nixon and Australian Federal Police Chief Mick Keelty see something that looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like duck and is therefore definitely a banana.






In the West, no matter how harsh the daily onslaught of global Islam, our authorities, media and others can always go another level higher and deny it. In the last two days, our pathetic MSM has shown 12 Muslim creeps and pals on trial for gosh, what a coincidence, terrorism. The Australian newspaper is perhaps the best of a bad lot.

Seven guilty and five laughably not. Yes, I’m sure the five identical beard wearing, miserable looking ugly bastards with the faces of para-military brutes are completely innocent. Yes, they’re probably really open minded, light-hearted and groovy fun kids from the inner-city, all with a youthful smile and so very interested in Soul music and dancing etc. Er, no. I bet they like knives though.

Just look all twelve up. Notice any similarities? Yes, they all look like they’ve spent a lot of time to a lifetime thinking about murdering non-believers. Only two were not born here in Australia.

Ah, the innate and natural success of multiculturalism as opposed to integration and the big old melting pot. Just like in Britain and France and America and Sweden and Norway and Germany and Hell, everywhere and anywhere you have a percentage of Muslims approaching 1% to near the dreaded 10%.

Ok, I’ll start with the terribly decent I'm sure, no really, but annoying Stooge One Keith Moor at the Herald Sun for Wednesday September 17 2008. Now Keef “spent months interviewing and examining thousands of pages of court transcripts and other documents relating to Melbourne’s home grown terror cell to write this special report”.

Sadly, Keef forgot to actually study the key document the Koran, the key founder Mohammad and the harsh empirical facts of Islam today.

Oh but first remember folks, just because a Muslim has been a Muslim and followed Islam all their life, and their family has been Muslim and followed Islam for generations and centuries, and they look, live, dress, speak, pray, eat and think like a Muslim etc, and they read the Koran and have been to Mecca and so on and so on and so on, if Keith Moor and other boobs say these Muslims are mistaken about the truth of Islam, hey presto! Keiths allegedly da infidel Islam expert man but still thinks Islam has been er, "twisted".

Here’s Moor or less avoiding being un-PC to Islam, the doctrine of permanent warfare that wants to kill us all.

“They were also taught why, in Benbrika’s warped view of Islam, Muslim’s were expected to take part in violent Jihad”.

Benbrika’s view is not warped, Keef’s is. Classic apologist dhimmi drivel that cannot stand up to serious scrutiny via the facts. When folks say such things, is it incompetence, fear, ignorance or lying? What does it mean? You be da judge!

Benbrika is from Algeria and he has seven children by a full Burkha wearing Lebanese wife. He's been on welfare in Australia for 19 years. The country he wants to destroy. He was employed as an aircraft technical assistant by Algerian Airlines...Talk about giving a bad name to dole bludgers. It's Jihad for the Dole!

So often it seems they're baggage handlers or similiar, or no visable ability at all, eh? Oh, except for screaming about Jihad. And Doctors.

"Are you a raving Muslim Jihadist loon? Australia wants you to come here now and join the multi-culti daydream!"

From the Herald Sun: “He said he didn’t want to go back to Algeria because of its economic difficulties and that he “loved the Australian lifestyle[!]”

Yeah, whenever it's an Islamic monkey house and basket case vortex, full of freaking Islamist loons, that’ll happen every time. It's a real drag. A bummer even.

True Muslims are expected to wage permanent Jihad, [terror and warfare by any means] just as Mohammad did, as the Koran commands and how Muslims have behaved for 1300 years.

"Just like Mohammad did for me, ee, ee, ee!" I'll Make You Unhappy. The Uneasybeats.

Gee, I don’t really feel that Keef has read the Koran, studied Mohammad or Islam, and how it’s practiced by millions of Muslims in every Islamist state and in their long list of global aggression. What Islam is he referring to? Is there another Islam not founded through war, banditry, deception and mass murder by a rapist, paedophile and Jew hating killer?

“He used his classes to discuss an extreme form of Islam-a form which most Muslims despise and reject”.

Keef supplies zero evidence of Muslims who “despise and reject” the core beliefs of their own faith. Recent endless surveys of thousands of Muslims from Pew, the Census and others, have clearly shown that a significant proportion of Muslims support Sharia Law and an Islamic state in the Western country in which they have chosen to live, and in the goals and methods of Islamist terrorists. This is especially so with the Muslims of Britain and Europe, or as it’s now known, Eurabia.

Up to 75% of people in many parts of the Middle-East say they see Bin Laden as a Muslim hero.

Who rejects and despises Islam? Where and when exactly? Usually only a minority dare to be vocal if at all. So how would Keef know? Can he name a single Muslim dissident he supports?

Any Muslim or non-Muslim who criticises Islam, is threatened by other Muslims or murdered, and largely “despised and rejected” by Westerners like typical PC Left journalists as “racist” for saying anything.

One is always wrong about what fantastic and open minded fun Islam is, if you think it's no fun at all. Remember, no criticism of Islam is EVER the right kind of criticism. The only acceptable criticism of Islam is criticism of us, the West, the US and the Jews.

The auto rejection of criticism of Islam and its usual apologia, serves the same purpose as Communist apologia. It strips all hope and voice from Islam's millions of victims, and helps to crush the dissent of those Muslims who do "reject and despise" Islam. They're known as ex-Muslims. A very dangerous thing to be, even in the West if some other Muslims find out, or theWestern media.

“Moderate” Muslims have no serious or effective voice, power or influence whatsoever in any Islamic state. They figure and matter at about minus zero, as they largely do in the Western MSM.

If all these “moderate” Muslims are busy rejecting and despising “radical” Islam, how come the hundred or so Islamic states that are run entirely on such “radical” Islamic principles such as one religion enforced via mass torture, oppression and murder like Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Lebanon and Gaza etc, etc exist in the forms they do?

It’s not radical if millions follow Mohammad and the Koran to the letter.

Oh yes, all those massed Muslim rallies and protests against Islamic terror and the states that support them. Let me add them up for you Keef. Er, so far zero. It’s not an “extreme form of Islam”, Islam is extreme. There are no grades or personal interpretations of Islam. You can try, sure. But then they’ll kill you. You do understand that Mohammad, the Koran, Islam and Allah are all one and irrefutable? Islam punishes blasphemers with death don’t cha’ know?

Oh wait, Keef. Maybe you could direct me to this non-extreme Islam, the name of the founder, its book and where it’s practiced?

“Police who raided Benbrika’s home in 2005 seized video clips of eight executions carried out by radical Muslims in recent years, including eight beheadings”.

Like they do on a regular and daily basis in every Islamic state, so ipso facto the norm is not radical, innit?

Keef talks about fundamental Islam when Islam is fundamental etc. God, he get’s exhausting. So even after listening, seeing and speaking, Keef sees no evil. It’s not Islam, eh? It never is when it sucks. It’s “twisted”, “radical” or whatever disingenuous apologist drivel one can come up with sans a single damn fact to back it up. Everything that Benbrika said, I repeat everything he said, can be traced back clearly to Mohammad and the Koran and back again, all through Islamic history and right up to now. None of Keef’s excuses can make the same journey to any proof whatsoever.

Nope, PC dhimmi wishful thinking is not evidence, fluffy.

Benbrika says how those who think Jihad has any other meaning but war would be a “donkey”. Yes, the Western media and governments are filled with the ass hat wearing and deluded who simply refuse to do any serious research about the subject at hand, preferring to reel off the usual canards and bullshit to a gullible, uninformed and naïve public. But we’re not all boobs and media hacks.

“Benbrika was taped extolling the virtues of Al Qaeda Osama Bin Laden and urged his network to follow the doctrine of the notorious terrorist leader”.

Correction. Osama Bin Laden has no doctrine. He merely follows Koranic teachings as received by Mohammad. Bin Laden is not despised in the Islamic world, but is a Muslim hero available freely on video, DVD and t-shirts in every Muslim state worldwide.

He is seen by millions of Muslims as following the Koranic message exactly, just as the Ayatollah Khomeini is seen by millions and millions and millions of Muslims as a major Islamic spiritual leader. He’s the King Freak who promoted permanent war in anyway and against anyone, at least until the coming of the global Islamic Caliphate. He also gave explicit instructions on how to rape infant girls.

Oh yes, and he said this, baby:

"Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those [who say this] are witless. Islam says: Kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all!

Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers]? Islam says: Kill them, put them to the sword and scatter [their armies]...

Islam says: Whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for the Holy Warriors!

There are hundreds of other [Qur’anic] psalms and Hadiths [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight.

Does all this mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war? I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.” Ayatollah Khomeini.

So for Keef, it doesn’t occur to him why there is the same continuity across the globe in Islam especially when it’s er, “radical” dig? If each was pursuing merely their own “twisted” take on Islam, by logic there would be much variation. But there isn’t. It’s uniform.

It has much the same goals, methods, statements and results most everywhere because, now listen stupid, it all comes from the same single source and that’s Islam. The Koran, Mohammad and Islam are one and the same. Not a version, not a hijacking, not a perversion, not a misinterpretation and not any out of context diversionary tactic ad nauseum.

No, but Islam as it is.

Terror is Islam and Islam is terror. Islam is Mohammad and Mohammad is Islam is the Koran is Islam is Allah is Islam is the Koran is Islam. Dig?

“Benbrika was able to twist Muslim literature to extol the virtues of being a suicide bomber...”

Balls, he twisted nothing. The virtues are spelled out in the Koran. 72 virgins including underage boys, all sins forgiven, cross the bridge to paradise, seventy members of your family go to paradise, a special crown, soul kept in the body of a green bird! Hey, and saved from the punishment of the grave!

So Keef writes these down, must know they exist then seemingly denies it by saying Benbrika twisted Islamic literature? How? Show me the untwisted stuff then, Keef.

Also, there is no real Muslim literature per se. Even their own meagre offerings are not particularly valued. Thus the single Muslim writer who won a Nobel Prize, was attacked and paralysed by surprise! Another Muslim, with gosh, a knife. Here’s a fact about Muslim literature for what it's worth. [About $10.95 in paperback!]

Spain translates more actual literature into Spanish in any twelve month period than the entire Mid-East has published in 1300 years. Some of the most popular and allowed books in the cultural and literal deserts of the Muslim world where the illiteracy rate reaches 80%, would feature prominantly Mein Kampf which is on the Saudi and others school curriculum and the KGB anti-Semitic fraud The Protocols of the Elders of Zion’. Tons of Jihad stuff though and Henry Fords anti-Semitic ravings are damn popular too.

“Benbrika’s interpretation of Muslim religious documents was that if Merhi killed himself while committing a terrorist act in Victoria he would receive the seven special things Allah supposedly gives to martyrs and no one else”.

“Muslim religious documents?” The Koran you mean? Check. “Supposedly?” Is keef denying this? Blasphemer! So this ain’t in the Koran? It clearly is. Any journo worth a damn must be able to recognise fact from opinion unless incompetent, stupid or a liar.

Who speaks the truth of Islam? Puzzled and wrong Keef the Infidel, or Benbrika the sheet wearing Muslim creep? Benbrika baby, and every time.

Just read Benbrika the Freeker. His words and actions are entirely consistent with Mohammad the bastards hideous examples. Ah, Mohammad and his rotten insane life of criminal mass depravity, the filth of the Koran as Christopher Hitchens rightly called it and naturally, the abyss and Hellish doom of Islam. Yep, it all fits very nicely.

“I’ll take these but in white cotton!”

Maybe Keef et al, should just damn well listen to what our mortal enemies are saying? There’s an idea. The first dictum of war and victory is “Know thine enemy”.

“Ok by Allah because stealing to fund terrorism was approved by the exalted one”. Article excerpt.

The following spells out the global truth of Islam in these heartwarming Benbrika quotes:

“We’ll damage buildings, blast things...thinking big not small”.

“So the Jihad exists here”.

“The first thing I ask of you is the pledge, and this is the pledge [is] the Jihad...”

“Killing them is permissible...The scholar’s opinion is that women and children of the Kuffar [unbelievers] are not to be killed deliberately...” There’s a nice lie right there. Yes, Muslim terrorists are well known for their careful quality control when murdering. They’re so moral! And always we are Kuffar’s".

“...but if killing of the Father’s cannot happen without hitting them...” So protect your family and society against Islamists creeps and you are murdered, or if you are the Father, they'll kill you anyway. So resist Islamisation at all and you die. In Australia, you just won’t get published in any media".

“It is permissible to kill (inaudible)...the killing of unprotected women, the elderly and children...”

“...and this is clear due to the Prophet’s, blessed is he, justification”.

Benbrika also says how expressing an opinion that Muslims do not approve of will mean death. And he’s merely stating the truth as it happens.

The Police in part say “...They certainly talked the talk. Constantly in the back of our minds was the dreadful thought ‘What if they do something and we miss it?’

Exactly. And you appear to have done precisely that. Like the mountain of facts regards Islam. Keef looked for months and seemingly lived the cliché of there are none as blind as etc.

Stooge Two is our enormously fantastic Police Commissioner Christine Nixon. Or is that fantastically enormous?

“It is a fair description to say Benbrika preyed on the vulnerability of young men, under the cloak of religion, as a means to extol his own extremist version of Islam”. Christine Nixon.

Er, no. It’s a fairly dumb description or no description at all. There is no er, “cloak” per se. Islam is out in the open. Maybe you’ve fallen for the Koranic method of deception known as Taqiyaa. Now there's a cloak, but used to hide the hideous truth of Islam. Then you better resign then, eh?

Benbrika has no personal “extremist” view of Islam. How come all these dumb Islamist bastards can all come up with their own religion?! I mean, really. You believe that? And they’re amazingly and exactly the same. Gee, what a freaking coincidence?

Christ, it goes on. Let’s get to Stooge Three. Australian Federal Police Commissioner Mick Keelty. The very decent too, and seemingly out of his intellectual depth Keelty, often has the feel of a well meaning but kinda daggy Uncle.

"Have you boys seen my shifting spanner?"

Mick says the Koranic fact of the 72 virgins thing is used by er, Islamic “extremists”. Where’s the logic?

“That’s really at the heart of the radicalisation process”.

Really? Is that how they do it? Well I'll be a monkey's Imam. No. Islam itself and its singular aim of spreading Islam is at the heart of it. Why does this guy drain my confidence like finding out your date is wearing big Mumsy flesh coloured underpants?

“This is one of the things our counter-radicalisation strategies are trying to defeat. We now know a lot more about radicalisation and how it works around the world”.

Er, don’t appear to and not enough to think where it comes from eh, and what powers it. 1300 years of Islamic history via Mohammad and the Koran I believe, Chuck. Is Mick aware that Muslims conquered much of the known world, and murdered as far as Toures in France after enslaving and destroying utterly everywhere they went?

Is he not aware that modern terror is not new and is much like the Muslim Barbary Pirates? They were stopped by military means. Does he know that the head Muslim guy of the time said the same things as Benbrika and Bin Laden? That Islam has the duty and right to murder anyone in the name of Islam until they pay the jizya, [a form of permanent ransom, tax and extortion], or they surrender and or die? Guess not. It all seems rather recent with no serious core causes or goals of its own.

Then as per usual, after every Muslim atrocity, Mick too says how we have to reach out to the Muslim community, and why the “relationship” with Muslims is so important. The one where Muslims attack and murder people all over the world and other Muslims and we apologise “reach out” and excuse or ignore the murders, especially of other Muslims? That one? You mean interfaith dialogue number 750?

It's a seemingly one way relationship, innit?

Er, shouldn’t all these alleged moderate Muslims be reaching out to er, us? Just once? And gee, maybe without using it as an opportunity to blame us and as usual, the ah, Jews?

It’s pathetic, embarrassing and sadly, rather deadly. Why are there no moderate or radical Taoist’s, Buddhist’s, Anglican’s, Jews, Hawaiian volcano worshippers or Cargo Cultist’s per se? Nope, there's only really moderate and radical Muslims pretty much. Yep, maybe a few other kind of limited examples, but nothing that wages global asymmetrical Jihad like the Islamists do.

"The way you do the things you do!"

Sure there are moderate Muslims. Sadly, by default they cannot be real Muslims, and that’s why they’re the first target of Islamists, who are authentic Muslims, just like Mohammad.

“That’s why the broader Australian community does not condemn the entire Muslim community for the actions of a few”.

Yes, it’s always about our alleged bigotry sans any evidence but never theirs, even while Muslim's plan to murder us and kill thousands globally. 52 Islamic states that condemn and hate Jews via the UN is not a minority. 750 no-go zones in France is not a minority.

Almost half of UK Muslim males 15 to 35 supporting Jihad, Sharia, an Islamic state and the goals and methods of terrorist's and especially Al Qaeda, is not a minority. Over 2,000 Muslims pouring out of a Lakemba Mosque in support of Islamist killers and threatening to kill the press and Infidels is not a minority. Etc, etc, etc.

It’s not a minority if there are many Islamic states and they contain millions of Muslims who follow Mohammad, the Koran and er, gee, Islam.

“That is really important because we have all got to work through this together”. [!]

WE don’t have to work through anything. The free West does not need Islam for a damn thing. Maybe just stop the fucking terrorist attacks, you miserable stupid bastards! Anything to be noticed outside of actual achievement and contribution. Yes, “work through” that.

We are under attack by Islamist Muslims and Muslims only, and they believe entirely in Islam. What can we say or do that will make them stop believing in Islam? Only Muslims need to work through anything.

Like jeepers, why do they follow the murderous and insane doctrine of a rapist, paedophile and killer? Why are all Muslims states utter totalitarian theocratic Hell hole failures even with their free oil money?

Why is Islam so problematic? Why are so many Muslims often such humourless, miserable, blame shifting, Jew hating losers and liars? Why is about 95% of global violence committed by Muslims? Why are the biggest oppressors and murderers of Muslims other Muslims? Why do 1.4 billion Muslims have 7 Nobel Prizes while 14 million Jews have 159?

Why do Muslim states produce virtually no art, music, film, medical advances, technology or well, much of anything at all? If you removeoil from the equation, why does Finland produce more actual goods for export than the entire Mid-East? Why do Muslims alone among the people of the world, blame the entirely for their largely self inflicted problems and dysfunctions, the successful parts of the world like the USA and exclusively the best and brightest people, the Jews?

But I digress.

Maybe Mick means the invisible Muslim community that have expressed such silent outrage at the terrorists and what Islam does and what they wanted to do to um, us. Yes, sure. Like the following from the Herald Sun:

"The reaction from the Muslim community to the verdicts is one of mixed emotions, as many people know of these men and empathise with the hardship that their families have endured to date and will continue to endure beyond today."

Yes. Mixed. Not much “empathy” for the Infidel in that mix is there? Oh, I’m sure there will be many Muslim apologies, sharing the bill for the trial and wow, huge Muslim protests condemning terror...any...day...now. Guess not.

In the end, Benbrika “manipulated” nothing. He simply opened a franchise of Islam Murder Inc, and presented Islam as it is.

So why do people we rely on for our very lives such as our Police, government and media, say, promote and maybe even good God, believe such Islamist apologia bullshit? Maybe sports, because not one of them has the intellectual courage or otherwise, to look directly at and understand, grasp or state the truth of Islam.

Could be. They’d all get fired, or worse, wouldn’t they?

Imagine the peaceful reaction of our alleged friends in Indonesia, our local Leftard cultural elites and our largely bankrupt MSM, ad nauseum? No, better to abase ourselves and lie to the clueless Australian public. That’s much easier and it’s cheaper! Hey, they’ve got no voice anyway.

Imagine there’s no Islam. It’s easy if you try. No Hell below us, above us only sky...

No one needs to "twist" Islam. Islam is pre-twisted.

Benbrika and millions and millions of authentic Muslims no more need to er, "twist" Islam, than the SS and Gestapo needed to "twist" Nazism. Or Imperial Japan had to "twist" Bushido.

Or Che the Child killer Guevara and Castro had to “twist” Communism on their floating firing squad with an island of 300 prisons attached. Or the vast 1984 times a thousand styled concentration camp of North Korea “twists” totalitarian Communism. Or the Soviet KGB, the NKVD and Stalin etc, ever needed to "twist" their totalitarian Communist/Socialist mass grave. They always were as they always did and gee, still do.

The scandal of the 20th century as the great Christopher Hitchens correctly noted, was that Western elites never called Communism what it was: an evil ideology based entirely on mass murder, oppression, lies, conformity, envy, spite, millions of helpless prisoners and madness. Just like Islam.

The scandal of today is that the same kinds of people are now doing this for Islam, as they apologise, excuse, ignore and lie not just maybe to themselves, but to you and I.

The fact that millions of simple minded and highly intelligent boobs commit treason against our society by incompetence, laziness, cowardice, error, default or deliberation, sickens one, does it not? The fraud that Islam is anything but an inherently violent totalitarian doctrine is merely a classic 'Big Lie', just like all the others, starting with Communism, then Nazism and now Islamism, which ironically pre-dates them all.

It is to laugh.

God help us all, because those in charge seem incapable of it and refuse to do so by disclosing fully, effectively and truthfully the harsh, horrible truth of Islam. So check.

"What are you afraid of Dr?" Chuck to Dr Zaius. Planet of the Apes.

The Colonel Neville Doctrine.

For total victory over Islamist terror states, narco-feifdoms, Communist firing squad prison worlds, cannibal King G8 charity funded Hell holes and any other totalitarian vortex, The Colonel Neville Doctrine is as follows:

"First enrage your opponent. Then kill their leaders. Destabilise their governments. Crush their military power and reach. Stop and confiscate their funds. Copy and modify victory, deflect force, reject defeat and always counter-strike. Defeat utterly then rebuild. And oh yes. Effectively and immediately stop enabling the same threats to grow domestically toward a terrifying cultural and security collapse, and societal suicide. Repeat.

While grooving on the previous, state the facts in clear, simple terms repeatedly and loudly and always at the time. Never let big lies go unanswered. Never apologise for the facts. Always have a sense of humour and style. Understand that the free Western Canon is a small bright light in the long dark tunnel of human history. It may not hurt to declare that we are indeed at asymetrical war, and thus it's a series of multiple and overlapping events on many fronts. It's WW1V [4] actually".

Sadly, being a guitar playing blogger, the Colonel Neville Doctrine is not currently available per se. But I do make a nice warm chicken salad and people rave about how neatly I fold my tea towels.




“The best lack all conviction, while the worst,
Are full of passionate intensity”. William Butler Yeats.

The trouble with a standard out of contest and dull reading of the classic Yeats quote bit, is that it appears to be balls in a lot of ways, and a rather lose-lose conundrum if you follow it as any kind of non-plan of non-action. If you’re a jellyfish putz prostrated with confusion on the floor, you’re good! Get off your arse with conviction and ipso facto, ya bad?

“Gee, I wish there was more of the failure of the ineffectual and unsure around!” Er, no. I get enough of that at home.

“It’s some catch that Catch 22!” Catch 22.

Of course that ain’t what Yeatsy baby meant, as any full reading of the interesting focus in the poem on things curiously creepy and desert dwelling reveals. Check it out the full Bill Yeats menu at the end of this shabby post.

Hey, here’s a cool doctrine I recall. The epic and tragically flawed JFK was not really talking interfaith dialogue number 754, and cosy fireside chats with killers I believe, though sadly far too many have committed that sin. Nope, it's very muscular and just what the Doctor ordered.


“Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans—born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage—and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this Nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, in order to assure the survival and the success of liberty. This much we pledge—and more”.

John F. Kennedy Inaugural Address.


Dear sports, yes if one diggeth the empirical and rational via serious research, and is in possession of any core values based on the acceptance of er, reality, well, most every communication with variations on “starry eyed Clintonistas” or similar, will invariably open a can of tiresome mass cliché worms by default. They are if anything it seems, passionate, but not always much else tangible.

It can try one’s patience, and not just because it’s demanding to write down such by the numbers raw material for comedy and pathos, but because hey, you can tell you’re really ending up doing all the thinking skills for another person or two or the hordes of Left infected Koskid millions, who refuse to follow the logic of things and do the work required to face objective facts with or without nuance. No, really.

But then, I do live in the inner-city, where there are thousands of rebels easily recognisable by their identical mediocre, worthless thoughts and tedious statements signifying precisely zero. I can’t use ‘em, man, except for laughs.

Curiously, while I humbly admit I seem to be able to come up with destabilising, fresh, fun and crushing punch lines, rather sadly, most supply the same straight line set-ups over and over again. Though it's often a real gasser, it still can give me a headache and a feeling of inertia.

Sure, there's a negative side too.

And here’s the great Charles Krauthammer on the facts of the Bush Doctrine Mark 4, being the spread of Democracy globally. I like it, but then I’ve lived in a showroom of Democracy by force in Japan. Oh yes, it works. And Mr K should know. Charlie kind of coined the term Bush Doctrine. This cool piece of essential insight via Shooting Star via the terrific Andrew Bolt.

The lovely Eowyn at Shooting Star posted a groovy and thoughtful comment on the same brain bursting fall-out felt by us all from the research required in sourcing, cross-referencing, remembering, analysing and making sense of the etc, etc, in order to see the harsh reality of things. Dig? Anyone who kisses a mammal born with a permanent smile, is ok with me.

“My dear Colonel:

I would refer you to this post by a dear Canadian friend as background: as an example of the increasing insanity demanding increasing brain circuitry to process increasing demands on said brain circuitry. (If that makes sense.)

William of Ockham must be performing gymnastics in his grave.

I admit that I, as a mere mortal, suffer brain overload by merely trying to connect the dots between outright insanity and reality ... and I guess, what I'm asking here, is strategies to not only be able to absorb black-equals-white, and recognize it for what it is, but also how to answer it effectively.

Whew. A tall order, I realize...” Eowyn.

She’s right. And how many folks are like our Eowyn, and really want to get to the old apple core of thangs? God bless that inquisitive kid.

One thing in countering not just those infected by Leftism but regular folks for example, is that everywhere you go people often say curiously identical things that can usually be dealt with rather effectively with the same answers. This can maybe sound kinda mechanical, and maybe easy to become ineffectual due to things constantly changing an' all, but not necessarily. In fact, surprisingly not as much as you'd think. Armed with a few links to the definitions of Logical Fallacy, Cognitive Bias, Ockhams Razor and macrame for beginners etc, I feel stripped down and prepared to break up my rhythm to events, so to speak.

Rhetorically speaking, my motto is to never throw a mistimed and thus bad punch, Jim. You must know the possible range of responses per se, and if not, be able to respond authentically, simply and effectively. Aye, there's the rub.

“All failure is a lack of concentration”. Bruce Lee.

Lee used to laugh at some of the pointless despair of alleged martial arts boobs, who would learn perhaps hundred of complicated moves that under pressure of a real opponent, may just collapse like wet bread, or a new child rearing theory when applied to an actual child. Instead, good old Bruce worked endlessly on perfecting simple and stripped down moves, until they were extremely fluid, spontaneous, natural, complete, flexible and so very powerful. They were beautiful, baby.

So that’s what I try to do in my feeble way. Lacking the educational training I sorely needed, I guess I developed the classic polymath approach on most things. But I focus and refine an actually small set of mental tools. I have to! Well, that’s my aim, as man, I still get very badly caught out sometimes, though I can usually regroup the old brain and correct errors after a breather.

Yep, it ain’t easy as there is soooooooooooooo much of everything, especially bullshit. Bruce Lee had these few simple lines as a kind of personal guide. It’s pretty hip.

Lee said “Absorb what is useful, reject what is useless, research your own experience and put in what is essentially your own”.

I dig paradox, or do I?! And ditto the traditionally good, proven and useful as well as the new and worthwhile or for that matter the utterly pointless, if it’s a laugh and fun, which is entirely the point. I can accept two or more opposing things at the same time, like a husband and wife for example! I do try. At least that's the plan. Hey, hey, hey.

“Annihilate your opponent”. Bruce Lee.

"There is no opponent". Bruce Lee.

“Life is too important to be taken seriously”. A worn Oscar Wilde quote but a good one.Here’s another.

“The truth is rarely pure and never simple”.

Sometimes people say gee, you know a lot, but I don’t. Really. I’m essentially untrained, under pressure and under funded. I’m not a raging success. I can’t buy all the materials I want such as all the books I dig. I’ve just made some effort to maintain an open curiosity and thirst for learning. Also I have limited interest in my own opinions. I don’t want any mere opinions per se. Opinions are not understanding. Opinions are amusing and human, but not always of much use.

“Find the causes of your own ignorance”. Bruce Lee.

Ah, there were so many! Man, I was damn unclear and rather ignorant for a damn long time, and only recently feel that I have a sense of lightness from the doubt of thinking gee, I wish someone could tell me. And you know why? 30 years of Indoctrinate U via the dominant Left paradigm, innit? It’s all alleged “good intentions” balls on the merry road to Marxist PC Hell.

It’s usually as practical and natural as a cheese umbrella, but way more evil for your autonomy than say, underwear made of vipers. Look at my previous post for the true Soviet Communist history of the PC. It all seems so nice and caring from this end, eh? But it ain’t. It’s a massive control freak lie.

But I digress, cos’ now I have the Net, books and friends online and so on. It’s all just a breath away. It’s a real relief, baby.

Though isn’t it odd, that there is so much great Quality Controlled stuff available and yet the majority seem uninterested, or go for the usual inferior brands because it’s fashionable and more right on, and thus nicely self-reflective?

I don’t seem to need that so much. I kinda like harsh facts. They keep me warm at night.

Roman writer Terence (Terentius) (c. 190-160 BCE): "Homo sum: humani nil a me alienum puto. I am a man (or human, or human being), (therefore) nothing human can be foreign to me".

"We should start with the premise that the United States, like all sovereign nations, has the unilateral right to defend itself against attack. As such, our campaign to take out Al Qaeda base camps and the Taliban regime that harboured them was entirely justified… (If) we’ve got (Osama bin Laden) in our sites, we should ask for Pakistan’s cooperation, we should ask Pakistan to take him out. But if they don’t, we shouldn’t need permission to go after folks that killed 3,000 Americans". Barak Obama.

"(The) global community should offer “big sticks and big carrots” to persuade Iran to halt its nuclear programme". Barak Obama.

“A nuclear Iran would pose a grave threat and the world must prevent Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon...” Barak Obama.

"I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our security and our ally, Israel". Barak Obama.

Colonel Neville: "It's almost enough to make you warm to Obama, inn it?"

“In order to stop Islamic extremists, those terrorists, who would seek to destroy America and our allies, we must do whatever it takes, and we must not blink...” Sarah Palin.


The Second Coming by William Butler Yeats.

“TURNING and turning in the widening gyre
The falcon cannot hear the falconer;
Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold;

Mere anarchy is loosed upon the world,
The blood-dimmed tide is loosed, and everywhere
The ceremony of innocence is drowned;

The best lack all conviction, while the worst
Are full of passionate intensity.

Surely some revelation is at hand;
Surely the Second Coming is at hand.
The Second Coming! Hardly are those words out
When a vast image out of Spiritus Mundi
Troubles my sight: somewhere in sands of the desert

A shape with lion body and the head of a man,
A gaze blank and pitiless as the sun,
Is moving its slow thighs, while all about it
Reel shadows of the indignant desert birds.

The darkness drops again; but now I know
That twenty centuries of stony sleep
Were vexed to nightmare by a rocking cradle,
And what rough beast, its hour come round at last,
Slouches towards Bethlehem to be born?”

Local Muslim community protest against Islamic terrorism held in undisclosed elevator.

Yep, it was standing room only at the recent Muslim anti-terror protest. "What do we want? Blame everyone but ourselves! When do we want it? I'm not sure as I used my mobile for a bomb timer, but I know it's all the Jews fault!"

"I’m beginning to think that everything causes terrorism: 1. Free Speech. 2. Kermit the Frog. 3. Britney Spears. 4. The price of arugula. 5. Those stupid looking Smart Cars. 6. Women wearing sweatpants with “juicy” written on their bums. 7. Debates about Creationism/evolution. 8. The Oscars.

Everything causes terrorism, except you know, terrorists and their stupid beliefs". mjk on Hotair July 30, 2008.


.
“In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is stoned to death”. Joan D. Vinge.



Mohammad: Alright. We’re all here then?

Mohammad: Allah Akbar!

Mohammad: Great. Ok. I think I speak for all of us when I say I totally condemn terrorism.

Mohammad: Absolutely, Roger, er Mohammad. Who doesn’t?

Mohammad: Thanks Mohammad. And I believe we all want to eliminate not only terrorists but the causes of terror as well?

Mohammad: Couldn’t agree more, old cheese.

Mohammad: And I believe that our Muslim scholars have identified both of these things.

Mohammad: Naturally. What hasn't the superior Islamic faith discovered? I mean our last big discovery was literally the idea of zero! And even less since! Ha, ha! But I digress. Now whose been cutting off all those heads and blowing up girls schools and so on?

Mohammad: I’m afraid it’s as our superior Islamic Universities suspected all along. It’s the Jews.

Mohammad: Excellent. So now we know what to protest about. I knew no Muslims were ever involved in terror. Outrageous!

Mohammad: So it’s unanimous then? Let the protest against terror begin!

Mohammad: Wait! We need a slogan!

Mohammad: Er, what about “Stop Terrorism! And really, it has nothing to do with Islam and Muslims, so don’t even think it. Not even a bit. No, really. It doesn’t. No. Even if you have millions of photographs, documents, a massive death toll and a crushing empirical Himalaya of profoundly researched and analytical evidence, it’s still not true. Just dismiss it. Please? Or we’ll kill you. And anyway, it’s all the Jews”.

Mohammad: It’s a bit long.

Mohammad: Ok, what about this one from Mohammad? “I am made triumphant through terror”.

Mohammad: I admit it’s got a certain sparkle , but anything else?

Mohammad: Here’s a Koran one. “Qur’an 3:151: "We shall cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieve”.

Mohammad: It’s good but something more, I don’t know, short, catchy and to the point.

Mohammad: Hey! “Death to the Infidels! Allah Akbar!”

Mohammad: I like it!



“When a thing is funny, search it carefully for a hidden truth”. George Bernard Shaw.

“I never did give them hell. I just told the truth, and they thought it was hell”. Harry S. Truman.

And now for something completely the same, the Official Danish Apology to the many heartwarming Muslims who were outraged by pencil drawings, but curiously, not by a single murder, beheading, mutilation or bomb blast. Go figure.

The Triangle of Left Liberal Hell: Repackaged, remodelled and delivered.

Barak Hussein Obama shown on the right and Saul Alinsky on the extreme Left, pictured travelling together as Barak absorbs completely the bright burning future of Left Liberal Marxist lies, indoctrination, infiltration and totalitarian control freakery. "Heed my words. Brainwash the young via the middle-classes, Obama".

[Saul Alinsky was an “extreme left intellectual. He was a radical Chicago activist who, by the time he died in 1972, had had a profound influence on the highest levels of the Democratic Party. Alinsky was a ‘transformational Marxist’ in the mould of Antonio Gramsci, who promoted the strategy of a ‘long march through the institutions’ by capturing the culture and turning it inside out as the most effective means of overturning western society”. Melanie Philips.]





Dear sports, now dig this. This is one of the most important posts I’ve ever done. No, really. At least outside of Islamism both foreign and domestic, any other Left insanity etc, and macrame.

Here's the full and amusing title: The Triangle of Left Liberal Hell via repackaged Marxism by PC stealth, the facts of Obama’s ideological training and the 45 long-term Communist goals now mostly in place". Certainly long and boring enough to be official, eh?

Now while some in the Koskid abyss of the Leftardsphere may consider my writing only suitable for wrapping fish, I consider their reading chronically below par. This is entirely due to their embarrassing love of conformist mediocrity, a low threshold for the empirically superior, linked to a high threshold for authentic boredom and that they're ugly, especially older Left Socialist hags.

More often Conservative women have an individual pride and self-respect, curiously lacking in the self-loathing and guilt ridden neurotic old activist pear and pumpkin shaped bore.

Meaning most any brand of either undernourished and listless vegetable swallowing, overweight and glamour-free, middle-aged, inner-urban neo-Socialist Left luvvie. Sometimes if it’s a woman [or both], they often sport a greying Prince Valiant bob framing a face of a don’t kiss and no make-up sand groper, or the equally dispiriting visage of Benny Hill meets the Picture of Dorian Grey.

Dig, or like courageously wearing a semi-pyjama twin set made of curtain material and sad 1970’s style ethnic cotton memory tailoring, finished off with some kind of ugly and overly large African or Latin faux jewellery, to you know, show solidarity with the kind of people they have nothing in common with and that they’ll never have to get personally involved with in their better class of neighbourhood. For a Leftard, a plain shabby, juvenile lack of style and a pose of permanent anti-glamour, denotes being allegedly down to earth and “with the common people” credibility.

For credibility and reliability regards the pragmatic or nuanced, a score of zero is usually sufficient.

This usually shows that they may never have met any common people, at least those with standards, pride and ambition. But then an essential assumption of the Left Liberal, is their innate superiority and the converse inferiority of their adopted victims. Go figure.

If it’s a man, the smug conceit and general air of misery on behalf of the worlds downtrodden begins at the front door, and continues down past the hairline. Many a Left neo-Socialist cares deeply for people. Sadly, those people must live at least several neighbourhoods or 10,000 kilometres away. So if you’re standing next to him, lower your expectations of one on one warmth and concern, especially for your diversity of opinion.

Ok, they ain’t all like that. Many are worse! No, really, most folks infected by generations of Leftard Marxism are entirely regular people from all walks of life as the cliché goes. And that’s precisely the problem...

But I digress.

At the end of my part of this post, is the fabulous Melanie Phillips with an outstanding piece titled Revolution You Can Believe In, on the peculiar truth of Obama’s background, the radical Marxist freaks that he learnt from, what he learnt and why.

And most importantly, perhaps what it means for both you and I. It’s no coincidence that the pure Marxist ideology on which he has suckled, has leaked out via his venal and creepy hypocrite wife, Michelle. This is pivotal and serious stuff, matey’s. It should be spread far and wide, but it won’t be. It’s Left Liberalism and cleverly re-packaged Marxist ideology that has been spread far and wide.

[I have posted it in full as Melanie's writing on this is vitally important and I don't want it to become a lost link. Go to the original and dig the fantastic links.]

Then there’s the magnificent Atlas Shrugs on the true, startling, disturbing and over 80 year old history of the PC [Political Correctness] what its true purpose is, the Marxist geeks who created it and why. And especially the kind of damage it has done to our ability to actually think rationally, freely and with any discrimination at all in so many areas. Also, dig the narrators camp pipe and slippers routine. It's endearing!

I like this quote via Atlas Shrugs, [and the 22 minute video you must all watch] on the evil trickery of that Marxist centrepiece of contemporary post-modernism and ideological political tactic, known as “critical theory”.

Also known as "deconstructionism", its an original and authentic Nazi coined word. They too, wanted to destroy normal society and create a world of indoctrinated, hateful, inhuman and duped robots, all for the "collective good" of course.

“What is the theory? The theory is to criticise. The unremitting destructive criticism of every aspect of Western society, they hope to bring that society down”. From Atlas Shrugs.

And with more than a little help from their Islamist anti-Semitic friends and bedfellows.

And finally though many in our part of the blogosphere do know about this, most anyone you meet will never have heard of The Naked Communist book and the 45 Declared Long-Term Goals of Communism. Most will be nonplussed if by some miracle, they are actually curious at all. And if they do have that slim commodity of interest in things polymath and specific, they will find it alternatively hard to grasp, a deeply shocking record, feel helpless or dismiss it as far fetched.

Which will all work out just perfectly for the instigators.

Originally it must have seemed fantastic for Communist killers and avid exporters of Marxist methods to have such exact and clear plans and goals. Why I don’t know really, especially when that’s clearly as Marxist Leftist Radicals have always written, spoken and acted. But now, much of this hideous list is now the beyond belief local school or council policy and the platform of major political parties!

And more everyday, folks. More every day. Thus I've posted the exact Congressional record of these profoundly dangerous and evil aims as entered, just after Melanie's great piece. Remember that the links are cool at Melanies original posting.

A small note. The British Labour Party has enacted on average, one new law a day since being in office. That’s around over 3,000 new regulations. Can you be aware of all the old new laws plus the new ones in any practical way, and not be bored, disgusted, indifferent, fined or arrested? Hey, that’s the joy of PC re-packaged Marxism.

Thus the equation that Global Warming and Environmentalism = Global Socialism and Death.



Revolution you can believe in by Melanie Phillips. Tuesday 09 September 2008.

In her game-changing convention speech, Sarah Palin took a swipe at Obama for having been nothing more in his life than a ‘community organiser’.

This prompted the Obama campaign to issue a pained defence of community organisation as a way of promoting social change ‘from the bottom up’. The impression is that community organising is a worthy if woolly and ultimately ineffectual grassroots activity. This is to miss something of the greatest importance: that in the world of Barack Obama, community organisers are a key strategy in a different game altogether; and the name of that game is revolutionary Marxism.

The seditious role of the community organiser was developed by an extreme left intellectual called Saul Alinsky. He was a radical Chicago activist who, by the time he died in 1972, had had a profound influence on the highest levels of the Democratic party.

Alinsky was a ‘transformational Marxist’ in the mould of Antonio Gramsci, who promoted the strategy of a ‘long march through the institutions’ by capturing the culture and turning it inside out as the most effective means of overturning western society. In similar vein, Alinsky condemned the New Left for alienating the general public by its demonstrations and outlandish appearance.

The revolution had to be carried out through stealth and deception. Its proponents had to cultivate an image of centrism and pragmatism. A master of infiltration, Alinsky wooed Chicago mobsters and Wall Street financiers alike. And successive Democratic politicians fell under his spell.

His creed was set out in his book ‘Rules for Radicals’ – a book he dedicated to Lucifer, whom he called the ‘first radical’. It was Alinsky for whom ‘change’ was his mantra. And by ‘change’, he meant a Marxist revolution achieved by slow, incremental, Machiavellian means which turned society inside out. This had to be done through systematic deception, winning the trust of the naively idealistic middle class by using the language of morality to conceal an agenda designed to destroy it. And the way to do this, he said, was through ‘people’s organisations’.

Community organisers would mobilise direct action by the oppressed masses against their capitalist oppressors. In FrontPageMagazine.Com John Perazzo writes:

These People’s Organizations were to be composed largely of discontented individuals who believed that society was replete with injustices that prevented them from being able to live satisfying lives. Such organizations, Alinsky advised, should not be imported from the outside into a community, but rather should be staffed by locals who, with some guidance from trained radical organizers, could set their own agendas.

The installment of local leaders as the top-level officers of People’s Organizations helped give the organizations credibility and authenticity in the eyes of the community. This tactic closely paralleled the longtime Communist Party strategy of creating front organizations that ostensibly were led by non-communist fellow-travelers, but which were in fact controlled by Party members behind the scenes...

Alinsky viewed as supremely important the role of the organizer, or master manipulator, whose guidance was responsible for setting the agendas of the People’s Organization... Alinsky laid out a set of basic principles to guide the actions and decisions of radical organizers and the People’s Organizations they established. The organizer, he said, ‘must first rub raw the resentments of the people; fan the latent hostilities to the point of overt expression. He must search out controversy and issues, rather than avoid them, for unless there is controversy people are not concerned enough to act.’

[40] The organizer’s function, he added, was ‘to agitate to the point of conflict’[41] and ‘to maneuver and bait the establishment so that it will publicly attack him as a “dangerous enemy.” ‘[42] ‘The word ‘enemy,’ said Alinsky, ‘is sufficient to put the organizer on the side of the people’;[43] i.e., to convince members of the community that he is so eager to advocate on their behalf, that he has willingly opened himself up to condemnation and derision.

Obama’s connection with Alinsky, whom he never met but whom he reportedly idolised, was through two bodies promoting the Alinsky model of community organisation, ACORN and the Gamaliel Foundation. John Perazzo again:

Obama was trained by the Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) in Chicago and worked for an affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation, whose modus operandi for the creation of ‘a more just and democratic society’ is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method. As The Nation magazine puts it, ‘Obama worked in the organizing tradition of Saul Alinsky, who made Chicago the birthplace of modern community organizing...’ In fact, for several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method.

But Obama brought a special slant to Alinsky’s radicalism.Far from being – as he has been painted – a ‘post-racial’ politician, Obama’s politics are all about promoting the cause of black people and achieving ‘reparations’ from white society (a perspective through which his whole welfare redistribution agenda is framed).

Accordingly, he saw his three-year role as a community organiser in Chicago as mobilising black people for action against their white oppressors. Finding himself hampered in creating an activist network among black churches, he decided to join such a church to give himself more credibility.

That’s why he joined the infamous black-power Trinity Church of Christ – a move, it seems, that had less to do with any spiritual quest than as a radical tactic for mobilising the black proletariat.

According to Stanley Kurtz in National Review (subscription required), as a trainer for Gamaliel and ACORN Obama used his influence to secure a major increase in funding for both groups. Kurtz writes of Gamaliel, one of the least known yet most influential national umbrella groups for church-based community organizers:

Gamaliel specializes in ideological stealth, and Obama, a master student of Gamaliel strategy, shows disturbing signs of being a sub rosa radical himself.

Obama's legislative tactics, as well as his persistent professions of non-ideological pragmatism, appear to be inspired by his radical mentors' most sophisticated tactics. Not only has Obama studied, taught, and apparently absorbed stealth techniques from radical groups like Gamaliel and ACORN, but in his position as a board member of Chicago’s supposedly nonpartisan Woods Fund, he quietly funneled money to his radical allies -- at the very moment he most needed their support to boost his political career.

Kurtz also quotes Rutgers political scientist Heidi Swarts who, in her book Organizing Urban America: Secular and Faith-based Progressive Movements, lays out the strategy of stealth:

Swarts calls groups like ACORN and (especially) Gamaliel ‘invisible actors,’ hidden from public view because they often prefer to downplay their efforts, because they work locally, and because scholars and journalists pay greater attention to movements with national profiles (like the Sierra Club or the Christian Coalition).

Congregation-based community organizations like Gamaliel, by contrast, are often invisible even at the local level. A newspaper might report on a demonstration led by a local minister or priest, for example, without noticing that the clergyman in question is part of the Gamaliel network. ‘Though often hidden from view,’ says Swarts, ‘leaders have intentionally and strategically organized these movements that appear to well up and erupt from below.’

Although Gamaliel and ACORN have significantly different tactics and styles, Swarts notes that their political goals and ideologies are broadly similar. Both groups press the state for economic redistribution. The tactics of Gamaliel and ACORN have been shaped in a ‘post-Alinsky’ era of welfare reform and conservative resurgence, posing a severe challenge to those who wish to expand the welfare state. The answer these activists have hit upon, says Swarts, is to work incrementally in urban areas, while deliberately downplaying the far-Left ideology that stands behind their carefully targeted campaigns.

To avoid seeming like radicals or ‘hippies left over from the sixties,’ Gamaliel organizers are careful to wear conventional clothing and conduct themselves with dignity, even formality. Since liberal social movements tend to come off as naïve and idealistic, Gamaliel organizers make a point of presenting their ideas as practical, pragmatic, and down-to-earth. When no one else is listening, Gamaliel organizers may rail at ‘racism,’ ‘sexism,’ and ‘oppressive corporate systems,’ but when speaking to their blue-collar followers, they describe their plans as ‘common sense solutions for working families.’

If anyone should doubt Obama’s debt to Saul Alinsky, they might ponder this encomium from no less an authority than Alinsky’s own son. In a letter to the Boston Globe, L. David Alinsky wrote of his father’s influence at the Democratic Convention:

All the elements were present: the individual stories told by real people of their situation and hardships, the packed-to-the rafters crowd, the crowd’s chanting of key phrases and names, the action on the spot of texting and phoning to show instant support and commitment to jump into the political battle, the rallying selections of music, the setting of the agenda by the power people.

Barack Obama's training in Chicago by the great community organizers is showing its effectiveness. It is an amazingly powerful format, and the method of my late father always works to get the message out and get the supporters on board. When executed meticulously and thoughtfully, it is a powerful strategy for initiating change and making it really happen. Obama learned his lesson well.

Obama’s questionable links to various radicals are now well-known: the black power racists Rev. Jeremiah Wright and Fr. Michael Pfleger, the former Weather Underground terrorism supporters Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorn. On CNN’s Glenn Beck show a few days ago Jerome Corsi, author of Obama Nation, observed:

Obama began his career, his coming out party in 1995, and Ayers and Bernadine Dorn's home. And then for, you know, some 20 years, Obama has been working with Ayers, certainly since 1995, on a series of foundations: the Annenberg Foundation and the Woods Foundation. The boards of directors together, or in the Annenberg Foundation, Ayers created it, and Obama was on it. And together they spent the money of these foundations to implement their radical socialist agenda.

As EM Forster wrote in a somewhat different context, only connect.

When Hillary Clinton was fighting Obama for the Democratic candidacy, her camp implied that the party would be making a terrible mistake in selecting Obama because, unlike centrist Hillary, he was a left-winger. But Hillary is an even more fervent Alinsky acolyte. In their book The Shadow Party, David Horowitz and Glenn Poe recount how Hillary first met Alinsky through a left-wing church group to which she belonged in high school, and stayed close to him until his death. Indeed, so impressed was she with his beliefs that she wrote a 75-page salute to him in her senior thesis at Wellesley College in 1969, which contained excerpts of the not-yet published Rules for Radicals. She wrote:

If the ideals Alinsky espouses were actualized, the result would be social revolution. Ironically, this is not a disjunctive projection if considered in the tradition of Western democratic theory. In the first chapter it was pointed out that Alinsky is regarded by many as the proponent of a dangerous socio/political philosophy. As such, he has been feared -- just as Eugene Debs or Walt Whitman or Martin Luther King has been feared, because each embraced the most radical of political faiths -- democracy.

That’s not democracy as we know it, more a Marxist conception of people power. On FrontPage, Perazzo writes:

During her senior year, Hillary was offered a job by Alinsky but chose instead to enrol at Yale Law School. Alinsky’s teachings, however, would remain close to her heart throughout her adult life. According to a Washington Post report, ‘As first lady, Clinton occasionally lent her name to projects endorsed by the Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF), the Alinsky group that had offered her a job in 1968. She raised money and attended two events organized by the Washington Interfaith Network, an IAF affiliate.’

Alinsky was a radical straight out of the Gramsci playbook. In both America and Britain, Gramsci’s acolytes have been conducting a decades-long march through the institutions. In Britain, they have substantially achieved their aim of subverting western morality and changing the face of British society. No political party stands against this. In the US, they have made huge inroads but haven’t yet won. With Palin on one side and Obama on the other, it is now clear that this US presidential election has taken the culture war to the gates of the White House itself". Melanie Philips.



Congressional Record--Appendix, pp. A34-A35. January 10, 1963.

Current Communist Goals

EXTENSION OF REMARKS OF HON. A. S. HERLONG, JR. OF FLORIDA IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. Thursday, January 10, 1963.

Mr. HERLONG. Mr. Speaker, Mrs. Patricia Nordman of De Land, Fla., is an ardent and articulate opponent of communism, and until recently published the De Land Courier, which she dedicated to the purpose of alerting the public to the dangers of communism in America.

At Mrs. Nordman's request, I include in the RECORD, under unanimous consent, the following "Current Communist Goals," which she identifies as an excerpt from "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen:

[From "The Naked Communist," by Cleon Skousen]

CURRENT COMMUNIST GOALS.

1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament of the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev's promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers' associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policymaking positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to "eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms."

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. "Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art."

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them "censorship" and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with "social" religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a "religious crutch."

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of "separation of church and state."

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the "common man."

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the "big picture." Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture--education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand.

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use united force to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction over nations and individuals alike".

Send Guns, Capitalism and Civil Government.

"Dictators agree. Gun control works". As Penn and Teller have empirically shown in the first of a video series, gun control is bullshit. Watch them all. They swing!




Here's a favourite from Saturday 16 February 2008.


Dear sports, a gun free zone means the armed can roam free shooting at their leisure. This is why lone killers go to “Gun free” school’s instead of an NRA meeting, a gun show, a police station, a gun shop, an air force base, a motorcycle gang roadhouse, a firing range, a military academy, a South Central gang house, a Mafia barbecue or Charlton Heston’s house. Well, because in a “Gun Free” zone no-one can defend themselves but most of the latter will take their rights of survival entirely seriously.

"Power comes out of the barrel of a gun". Mao, cliched but true.

It was precisely THE LACK of student guns that were the problem. Students are chosen because they’re entirely defenceless and in the end, for no other reason. That’s why the killer always fires so calmly as he knows everyone will I'm afraid, mostly die like sheep. Even hundreds of student’s to one creep will usually not try to rush one pud with a gun. That’s how everyone is trained now it seems. That’s what you always hear. “It’s foolish to resist. No point being a dead hero. Etc, etc, etc”.

They even tell women to do as they are told when raped! Men rape unarmed women. Armed women can stop a rapist completely.

Regards the Amish murders, half a dozen alleged males meekly stood passively outside in the hallway as the swine inside the school room shot one girl after another in the head. This is not so much a gun free zone, as a balls, spine and courage free zone. It certainly seems free of a sense of survival and strength of community.

Do not, I repeat do not rely on the fashionable and plain stupid directives of our weak minded authorities and the police, unless you enjoy the idea of dying like an animal in an abattoir.

Hey, following their illogic, why not make school a non-boredom zone, hospital’s a non-screaming zone, work a non-stress zone, make shopping centres a non-stealing zone and cinema’s non-farting zones. The non-applications that apparently and instantly make the world nicer and safer are endless.

Yep, ya right, these are all natural things though. So is the fact that killers will arm themselves and prey on those in the weaker position. I hesitate to call such killers fully insane beyond disturbed, because they are clear minded enough to figure out how to get a gun and go where people are unarmed and passive. Now if they attacked everyone with a banana, that would be insane.

Nearly everything that the MSM say about guns is wrong. As are those that have no experience of guns and are often irrationally hostile to the mere thought of their existence, knowing little to zero about them. Every cliché is just that and belongs in the realm of Logical Fallacy, Cognitive Bias and false attribution etc.

Let me say this clearly. I want guns but they have disarmed Australia just like England. Thus we are not free. Only American’s are truly free because no one and I do mean no one, can take their freedom away from them as long as they have their guns. Consider the truth of what the possession of guns by citizens means. We are not free because our freedom does not belong to us. The government allows us to be free and in a profound way, we must justify it and ask for it.

In America, the government cannot ask the question of “Can we take your freedom?” as they know the answer and they know they can’t. In truth, all Totalitarian Government’s and dictatorship’s never ask for anything from their people, they just take it and it’s gone. First they take the economic freedom of the people and then their guns. Thus a nation of slaves and mass murder victims are made.

Nobody ever oppressed and killed a wealthy and fully armed people.

Yeah, I want guns, racks of guns. I want submachine guns, heavy assault rifles, sporting guns, handguns and rack mounted heavy calibre weapons. I want to have a vast array of every kind of weapon I feel like having. Sorry, but I do. And I want them all entirely legally, and stored in an advanced secure armoury. I know I shouldn’t. I should purchase them illegally within a few days to weeks like most killers, criminals and Dictators do. Hey, but that’s just me.

Instead I have a trench shovel, a reading lamp and some dinner pepper. I’m ready! Ready to have every freedom stripped from me.

You see I was watching the film ‘The Lord of War’ starring Nick Cage as an arms dealer. The basic cliché is that people are dying because of the mere existence of guns. There are lots of guns in New York and not one civil war, revolution or coup. Gee, I wonder why? That’s right. They have a Capitalist economy and civil government, so no reason, no need and no way to start. It’s very hard for the average cannibal warlord, narco gangster, Islamist freak, Communist loser, revolutionary Che the child killer Guevara fan or other parasite misfits and frauds to build up an effective power base, say in Venice Beach, Boston or Fifth Avenue. Sure, they may often shop there…

A lot of smart, talented and skilful people were involved in making this film, but it never seemed to occur to any of them what the actual causes of people being killed with guns are. In this Sherlock Holmes Free Zone, no one noticed the two real reasons their Western home countries didn’t entirely suck and other places do, and not because the places that suck have almost as many guns as very gun bristling Sweden.

Nope, it’s because as P’J O’Rourke has clearly and empirically shown, every place that sucks lacks two things: great Capitalist economic systems and civil governments. Suck places can have lots of people or no people, resources or no resources or fertile land or desert. It will in the end, make not a damn bit of difference if they don’t have these two things. And once they have these two things they need guns to keep them. Mugabe took peoples economic freedom and only he has guns.

Now the whole idea is that if we can just take all the guns away, people won’t get killed anymore and will just sit pulling faces at each other, or maybe just start hugging.

“I love you man!” “No, I love you, man!”

So, apparently, the 90% of war dead made up of unarmed civilians can be decreased by making more civilians unarmed? Er, governments can and always will be able to buy or manufacture weapons. The problem for many civilians is that they have no civilian government to go with being a civilian. Thus their lowly status and the lack of any means to the prosperity with which to afford to arm and defend themselves. A pivotal scene that sums up a lot of the fairly modish views of the film is where Cage is making a gun deal near a refugee camp in Liberia. The guns are going to be used to first kill all the refugees, all living in er, a "Gun Free Zone!" His brother is shocked when he sees a women and child run from the camp and they get hacked to death by machete wielding killers.

"You can live and die in a Gun Free Zone!"

So what’s the message exactly? In the entirely impossible scenario of an unarmed cannibal kingdom, they’ll be reduced to machetes? Most of the fully unarmed of almost a million dead in Rwanda were murdered with machetes. Took a month but gangster states have plenty of time on their unproductive and heavily financed hands. Just like at a Bono and Bob ego Wankfest, no one ever mentions economic systems and civil governments of the type that make Bonzo and Boob’s lives so obscenely privileged as er, the answer. I mean at all. Apparently guns can not only kill, but even direct government policy.

“If it wasn’t for polishing my golden Kalashnikov, I really would have created free markets, a constructive environment for a professional business class to flourish in, an education system to be proud of and serious infrastructure projects. Instead I used up all the donor money on cocaine, whores and most spare evenings were spent eating human body parts. Guns are evil!”

Someone in the extra features said that it's not a Leftish film. I beg to differ, kid. The film lacks real solutions based on any historical or contemporary and correct analysis. It ends on a bogus and hopeless solution of control of the mere symptoms, and is filled with contradictions. That's pretty classic Left all right there.

Governments should be afraid of their people and not the people afraid of the government.

The film was enjoyable but it lacked clarity of insight, to put it mildly, of the central theme. It was maybe the usual Leftish list of evil big business, sinister government and America as the pre-eminent Machiavelli nation. Oh, there was the ‘good’ government agent, but he was er, ineffective and trumped by a shadowy mystery man from the Military Industrial Complex.

Hey, while wearing his full uniform, he remained undetected by keeping his back to the camera and re-enacting the ‘Deep Throat’ parking garage scenes. Yeah, sure, a government that can’t run a Department to handle drivers licences or your health care competently, can somehow still run a world wide conspiracy so perfectly that only Hollywood film directors, Charlie Sheen and Noam Chomsky know about it. And they roll out their global Master Plan while being simultaneously alleged “morons?!” Riiight, sure they do.

Hey, that's 'Innate Contradiction of the Left 326/12B'. One of my favourites.

Che the child killer and Fidel the torturer and pig destroyed the economy of Cuba, which was better than most European ones, and then disarmed everyone. All Totalitarian regimes act as if they are a government with a country. Free countries behave as a country with a government.

“The only way to make a small fortune with Marxism is to start with a big one”.

There are places in America where you have to carry a gun and they have little to zero crime. Only the unarmed of the world have been oppressed and murdered en masse for decades and always will be until they have economic freedom and guns. Enforce the correct training, use and storage of guns, not the disarming of millions of people. Thirty million guns in Africa and it’s a Hellhole.

There are millions of guns in Scandinavia and it’s not riven with perpetual civil chaos, patrolled by beaten up utilities stuffed with teenage rapist mutilators and mounted with machine guns. 250 million guns in America and an immeasurably small percent of the population act negligently or criminally using guns.

The numbers are entirely measurable regards the 100 million unarmed people murdered by Communist regimes so far. They’re still killing them in North Korea, China and Cuba etc. Why? Because they can, sports, because they can.

Unarmed people can never really be free in the first place, nor stay free.

There’s a lot of bullshit on the prairie.

Test audience reaction to the lovable new Muslim sitcom, 'Wanted Double Child Murderer' tested through the roof, of the Mosque! 45% of Islamist killers said they loved it and the other 50% said they wanted to kill the other 45%. The remaining 5% said it was a rip-off of Little Mosque on the Prairie. [No, this really is a show. Here's Mark Steyn on same.]

Nahahaha Mahoyhoyhee, pictured seventy third from the right, said she found it offensive to Islam. Not the show, but the actual word "it". "I will keel anyone who says it!", she said with a sparkle. "Oops! I must die!"





In the new Muslim drama, ‘Wanted Double Child Murderer’, Roger Mohammad Wilson plays the part of a devout Muslim Father struggling to shoot his two average daughters in the back of a car. Roger says he took the part to counter the stereotype of the wacky, fun loving and wry Muslim Father, fighting with a smile the natural intolerance of the Western host country that actually has an immigration policy.

This bigoted view of the cheerful Muslim always ready with a witty comeback to yet another stupid Infidel, has been unfairly promoted by government funded TV broadcasters who naturally feed off the long tradition of light hearted Islamic situation comedies and cuddly Hamas children's shows that love child killers. [No, really.]

Roger noted the enormous success and popularity of such shows with Islamic values and themes such as ‘Blind Date with a Blind Imam’, ‘Blankety Blank Mohammad’, ‘Dhimmi Celebrity Blow Up’, ‘Child Camel Jockey Race Around the World’ and ‘Kill That Jew’. Such programs have shown a more realistic and rounded Islamic reality, more so than the minority easy going one that is the usual image shown in the Western media.

Sadly, many in the Muslim community fear that naturally inferior Western infidels, kaffirs and blasphemers, especially non-Left Liberal Christians and Jews, still misunderstand Islam, with their unfair and "racist" criticism of tomorrow’s beheadings and bomb blasts.

“Improvised Urban Explosive Device detonations especially, are often taken out of context”, says Roger, who plays the lovable Mohammad Mohammad in 'Wanted Double Child Murderer'.

In the high rating Islamist comedy, Roger's character goes by the nickname Chuckles, as he attempts to highlight a more nuanced view of insane, low IQ killers on the run. The show revolves mostly around the comical murders, mayhem and other wacky daily Jihadist plots, that occur each episode in the colourfully named Death to the Unbelievers Mosque.

The series examines how the ignorant locals, mostly white Christians and Jews, regularly "misunderstand" their Muslim neighbours as they take the regular Islamist death threats and kidnappings "out of context".

'Wanted Double Childer Murderer' is set in the imaginary town of Delusion, Massachusetts. It originally began as a PBS program titled 'The Wonderful World of Yasser Arafat'.

Roger plays a typical everyday Islamist, who struggles to maintain not only a fake cover while secretly banking Saudi funds, but also the laundering of local money raised through organised crime and various phony charity organisations.

“What man doesn’t want to provide the best for his Jihadist cell? That’s where a lot of the great sitcom “misunderstandings” come in. There are some really great laughs there.

But seriously, I was drawn to this part because at last I could show the true face of Islam. It’s frustrating that when most people hear the word Islam, they smile and automatically say “Hey, I’d love some more of that Islam! Have you got a Koran on you?” If only people could see the reality of Islam as I do”, says Roger.

I asked Roger exactly what he would like people to realise about Islam and perhaps take away with them from the show.

“I’d be happy if folks just realise that Islam wants you all dead, even your own daughters”, he said with a wicked smile.

If all else fails, read the instructions. They’re in the Koran.

Mohammad was not alone in his lice ridden cave. But as the old joke goes, you’re never alone with delusions. Whatever Moe was afflicted with in his fevered little criminal mind, it sure has spread. One mans mental illness projected over 13 centuries. Sadly the other reptiles found Mohammad way too cold blooded and well, a freaky bastard who just wouldn’t shut up and eat his flies and bugs. Legend has it that he devoured the lizards too, just as he said he would and just as a minority of the easy going gecko’s suspected all along.



"It wasn't meant to be a game!" Rollerball. [1975]

In the original Rollerball film, a load of old rubbish from my teenage movie going years, there's a computer that holds all the world's knowledge. Must've been the size of Arizona. Oh that's right...it was the future. Yeah sure. It looked just like 1975, only neater. Apparently this computer had lost, and rather ironically I feel, the entire 13th century!

Yes, that century. If only we could. New York Times: "Norman Jewison's lumbering 1975 "Rollerball", a well-intentioned [why?] though heavy-handed assault on capitalism and sanctioned blood lust". [That's the movie, not Islamism.]

"...a movie that wasn't successful financially or artistically in the first place, then ''Rollerball'' fits the bill. The current version, however, like its predecessor, fails as entertainment...the sober-minded original was as graceful as a tap-dancing rhino, but it is just as boring and as obvious". [Gee, maybe they do mean Islam?]

My Father was a builder and I recall that the first sentence of the title of this post was originally printed on the top of certain paint tins. I thought it was kind of neat and curiously true of human nature. Sherlock Holmes liked to say that once the impossible has been eliminated, whatever is left, however improbable is most likely to be the truth.

Ok. Now dig this. I know the following is a link from the “All this and world war too” post, but it’s so good, so important, so vast, so profoundly researched, so extremely well annotated, as well as deeply, deeply scholarly and very much at the core facts of “the filth of Islam”, as Christopher Hitchens has rightly said, that I want to feature this. Take a week off to get through it all though. It covers almost everything but the dance cards for the Riyadh Fun Palace. No, really.

If it was compulsory reading at schools...wouldn’t that be interesting? Every day, Islamist geeks relentlessly state their case loud and clear, and it’s straight from their killer/pervert/paedophile/rapist/bandit/Jew hating Reptile King founder and his crude, turgid rather unreadable ravings. And relentlessly too, much of our clueless authorities, MSM, educators and Hell, most everyone, continue to not listen. Great, eh? And often not at all, to what millions of Islamist/Muslims are saying to us, what they mean and what they are empirically doing globally 24/7. Like, er, right now.

The Krazy Koran, like Mein Kampf but without the laughs, is the doctrine, document and the white paper that spells out everything you need to know explicitly in hellish and nihilistic detail. Thus, most of the MSM, educators, academics, military intelligence and government authorities have incredibly never read it! Maybe they’re waiting for the movie? It’s out. It’s called Obsession. No, really. Follow the, link kids.

Here’s my naff idea for a voice over: “Out of the 7th century comes a monster so strangely and immensely evil and deceptive, that only the mind of the Devil Mohammad, cast into the 9th Circle of Hell by Dante, could conceive of it. Islam: Coming to a cinema near you to burn it down”.

No go? So dig this excellent excerpt instead, by the fantastically scholarly Jeffrey Imm. His monumental efforts grabbed me as they should anyone. All hail The Great Imm!

“'Ere! It’s ‘im what done it!”


"Courage - of - our convictions... is more than just a phrase. It is an ethical challenge to generations of Americans past, present, and future. It is the fuel that burns the beacon of equality and liberty. America has a history of heroes that lived for and died for such courage - to stand as an example to those who would come after them.

Will our generation be able to rise to such a challenge, or will it find the burden of defending our values of equality and liberty too heavy? The choice to defend these values will be a costly sacrifice, but an even more costly sacrifice would be to fail to do so”. Jeffrey Imm.


A. The Islamic Supremacist Declaration of War on Equality and Freedom.

From a counter terrorist perspective, the Al Qaeda declarations of war against the United States in 1996 and 1998 are widely examined as a basis for a "war on terror." However, the Islamic supremacist challenges to equality and liberty have been occurring long before declarations of war by Al Qaeda or any other Islamic supremacist terrorist groups.

Three years after the defeat of the Nazi supremacists, in 1948, the United Nations General Assembly advocated a Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR) on human rights, freedom, and equality. In addition to abstention by Communist totalitarian nations, the Islamic supremacist Kingdom of Saudi Arabia refused to support such a resolution on equality.

In 1981, the Islamic supremacist Republic of Iran effectively issued a Sharia-based declaration of war on such ideas "when its representative affirmed that the UDHR represented a secular interpretation of the Judeo-Christian tradition which could not be implemented by Muslims; if a choice had to be made between its stipulations and 'the divine law of the country,' Iran would always choose Islamic law."

The Islamic supremacists leading Iran were more forthright in their position than Saudi Arabia; they stated clearly and unequivocally that equality and Sharia were clearly incompatible. In the midst of the Cold War, few truly appreciated this as the Sharia declaration of war on equality and freedom that it was.

In 2000, a year before the 9/11 attacks, the 57 nation Islamist supremacist organization, the Organization of the Islamic Conference, officially resolved to support the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights in Islam as an alternative document that says people have "freedom and right to a dignified life in accordance with the Islamic Shari'ah" -- an exclusionary ideology only for Muslims that denies freedom of religion and many other fundamental human rights of equality.

In 2001, nearly two months before the 9/11 attacks, the European Court of Human Rights determined that "the institution of Sharia law and a theocratic regime, were incompatible with the requirements of a democratic society."

Throughout the world on a daily basis, as analysts pore over the details of violent groups and their tactics, the details of terrorist finance, and the details of battlefield theatres, the anti-democratic stories of Sharia repression are widely ignored by many as the war of ideas with Islamic supremacism are not fully understood even today”.

B. "All Men Are Created Equal" Versus Sharia.

Tacticians believe the war is between Al-Qaeda and the West, the Taliban and the West, Hezbollah and the West, between Shiite and Sunni "extremists," or between terrorists and those who advocate non-violence. But this tactical view of world war only sees snapshots of individual theaters of violent activity and propaganda. The true aspects of the war remain a clash of ideological views, not merely individual political demands or battles.

Many in the United States and United Kingdom government leadership positions definitely do not want debate on this clash of ideological views, because they rightly fear that this will lead to more, not less confrontation. The historical mistake that they make is the assumption that such confrontation is something we don't need and something we can avoid. American leaders who fear such confrontation ignore the historical lessons of how other supremacist ideologies were fought and defeated.

The root of the real war is the ideas of equality and liberty versus Sharia and an Islamic supremacist form of societal control. Little is written about this war, which has numerous fronts around the world -- violent and non-violent, with propaganda fronts, economic fronts, demographic fronts, legal fronts, educational fronts.

It is really what happens in this war of ideas, not in the individual battles in Iraq, Afghanistan, or elsewhere that will be the deciding factor in our victory or defeat. But to understand this war of ideas, and understand the application of history in fighting supremacism to dealing with Islamic supremacism, we must understand the dual aspects of freedom and how they remain the greatest weapon in America's arsenal.

While Islamic supremacists view their growing population as their greatest weapon, America has its twin towers of freedom -- liberty and equality - which combined provides the greatest weapon on Earth against supremacism. Liberty and equality are the twin towers of America that can not and will not fall as long as American retains its commitment to its national values. America has proven the value of these hard-won ideological weapons against supremacist ideologies repeatedly throughout our history.

Liberty alone is not enough to fight supremacism. Liberty is only half of the equation of freedom; equality is the other completing half of freedom that provides the values to truly challenge any supremacist ideology -- the values of America that all men and women are created equal. We learned that nearly 90 years after America's creation, and we fought to rectify this with a dual commitment for equality as well as liberty.

In the larger, strategic war against Islamic supremacism, it is America's unique historical experience in the war of ideas against other supremacist organizations that our leaders must examine in finding answers and strategies in fighting Islamic suprematism today.

...Sometimes the correct thing to do in terms of tactical measures is not the right thing to do in terms of defending American values. When America is only viewed as a nation-state of citizens, it is easy to view tactical measures as the appropriate focus. But America is more than merely the geo-political nation state of the United States of America - it is an idea, it is a principle, for many it is a dream -- of equality and liberty. When Americans don't stand by the courage of their convictions, it doesn't just hurt America - it hurts the world.

Every oppressed person that looks to America as a beacon of hope in a dark world is mocked when we fail to stand tall. They are mocked to look at "their America" -- as corrupt and weak as "everyone else.

…Incredibly, in the minds of some, the Taliban are being viewed as "multi-faceted" and individuals available for negotiation, and rehabilitation back into political governance. Could you imagine suggestions that the Nazis or the Ku Klux Klan were multi-faceted and that attempts should be made to bring such supremacist ideologies into "mainstream" political parties? Yet this is precisely what has been suggested for the Taliban in Afghanistan by members of the United Nations and western political leaders.

The root of such dysfunctional behavior is the unwillingness to discuss the ideology behind the Taliban's actions. "Islamic supremacism" (or the westernized term of "Islamism") and its basis in Sharia are not a topic for discussion in western debate.

Per my recent writing on Pakistan, the growth of the influence of Sharia throughout the nuclear weapons-armed Islamic Republic of Pakistan and the efforts of the Taliban to enforce such Sharia law by gunpoint, beheadings, and bombs is also largely ignored by much of the news media and by civil liberty activists. Debate on Sharia is now officially forbidden in United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHRC) public hearings, as recently addressed.

-- Where once bombings and killings by white supremacist organizations were condemned by an informed American public and media, now such bombings and killings by Islamic supremacist organizations around the world go widely unnoticed and unreported, unless they happen in Iraq.

-- Where once marches and rallies were held calling for action against white supremacists, now marches and rallies are held calling for inaction against Islamic supremacists, including calls to release from prison Islamic supremacists associated with terror groups.

-- Where once white supremacist groups were excoriated as bullies, now much of academia, the media, and many individuals in American leadership apologize for Islamic supremacist groups around the world as victims, regardless of who is killed or maimed for the furtherance of such a supremacist ideology.

-- Where once we challenged white supremacist segregated schools, now American leadership chooses to ignore Islamic madrassas that teach hate and violence, including ones in the United States funded by the Islamic supremacist nation of Saudi Arabia.

-- Where once we alienated nations that advocated supremacist ideologies, now American leadership recognizes nations such as Saudi Arabia, Pakistan that advocate or support Islamic supremacist ideologies as "allies."

-- Where once we sought to destroy the remnants of Nazi Aryan supremacism in defeated Germany, now American leadership allows so-called non-violent Islamic supremacism to continue to grow and gain influence in Afghanistan and Iraq.

-- Where once the media and the creative world publicized the plight of Jews trying to escape Nazi supremacism, now there is a concerted silence by most of the media and the creative world on the plight of those who leave Islam trying to escape from death punishment as "apostates" in Islamic supremacist nations.

-- Where once academia viewed white supremacists as ignorant social outcasts, now today's academia invites representatives of Islamic supremacist organizations as members of forums on homeland security.

-- Where once leaders of America's news media attacked the savage nature of white supremacist ideology, now leaders of America's news media refuse to acknowledge the existence of Islamic supremacism, and the Washington Post and New York Times allows Islamic supremacist representatives of Hamas to publish articles in their newspapers.

… Supremacist ideologies, by their very nature, are at de facto war with equality. Failure to defend the ideology of equality is a de facto victory for supremacism.

So in an effort to reinvent old policy, today's UK has gone to a "War on Criminals" mode (since they won't use the word "Jihadists"), continuing to avoid recognizing the threat of Islamic supremacism as an ideology, and continuing to tolerate Islamic supremacist organizations (such as Hizb ut-Tahrir), while using terminology and public relations efforts (such as training Bobbies on Sharia) to convince British Muslims not to accept "extremism" or to support "criminals."

In fact, this "new policy" is not much more different from the "old policy" on Islamic supremacist ideology, except that if Islamic supremacists make direct, public, and prosecutable threats, then they can expect to be arrested, at least until they are turned loose again.

This "new strategy" by UK is not intended to confront Islamic supremacism as an ideology at all, which is why the chorus of denial on Islamic supremacism find it so attractive. It is only intended to discourage and temporarily disrupt Islamic supremacist terrorist plots from being actualized on a rolling basis. What the UK government fails to appreciate is that it can't simply keep its ship of state afloat by endlessly bailing water as the hole in the bottom continues to grow larger.

So with every new Sharia court established in the UK, with every new instance where British courts accepts Sharia, with every new pronouncement that Sharia law should be accepted, with every new comment that the Taliban and Al-Qaeda should be negotiated with, the empowerment of Islamic supremacism continues to grow as an ideology that can affect change within the United Kingdom.

While the UK government believes that such "tolerance" and "understanding" of Islamic supremacism defuses violence, it fails to understand that weakness in its national values encourages others to gravitate to stronger, more defined values, such as Islamic supremacism".

The Celebration of Mohammad the Reptile King.

Hey, Franz Kafka. The Metamorphis. The Trial. Just like a "How To Islamise" for today! Islamisation of the West is happening incrementally, like a ratchet: always relentlessly adding one more slot and without most people really noticing. Man, until one is not only surrounded by Sharia Creep and Sharia creeps, but you yourself are eventually infected in some way, as is your neighbourhood, the body politic, the media, schools, workplaces, the government and your associates etc, etc ad nauseum.

But here's the kicker: nobody believes it and that's why everyone flinches when they hear a loud bang. You just know everyone is thinking the religion of pieces as you are now. Poor bastards. Just not this time, sport.



“I woke up this morning and got myself a beer.
The future’s uncertain and the end is always near”. Roadhouse Blues. Jim Morrison and the Doors.

I've always thought how nicely Jim Morrison and the Doors doing their Celebration of the Lizard, Not To Touch The Earth panorama and medley thang, evokes the happening scenes of Mohammad, Islam and the Koran. Like these lines do:

“Lions in the street and roaming
Dogs in heat, rabid, foaming
A beast caged in the heart of a city...

Just close your eyes forget your name
Forget the world forget the people
And we'll erect a different steeple..

Reptiles abounding
Fossils, caves, cool air heights...

All now sleeping…There’s been a slaughter here...

With a strange creature groaning beside him
Sweat oozed from its shiny skin...

Feel the good cold stinging blood...

The snake was pale gold
Glazed and shrunken
We were afraid to touch it...

I think you know the game I mean
I mean the game called 'go insane'...

And I'm right there I'm going too
Release control we're breaking thru...

Wound in sheets
And daughters, smug...

The ceremony is about to begin
Wake up!
You can't remember where it was

Had this dream stopped?

Not to touch the earth
Not to see the sun
Nothing left to do, but
Run, run, run
Let's run”. The Doors. The Celebration of the Lizard.


Now if you can go with the conceit, it’s a little as if the alcoholic, clinically depressed acid head and laugh a minute genius didn’t die in Paris, but lived on and is writing from a spot near one of the over 750 no-go zones in France. It’s a groovy and hip piece. Ok, non-sequitur and slim in narrative clarity, a bit corny here and there, I know. Hey, it was the 1960's after all. But dig the weight of the words, much like the weight one feels once you have the understanding of the truth of Islam. Note the sudden explosive lines, the startling and prescient images a la the Islamic.

It’s all rather resonant don't ya think? But then the world is most resonant at night...

Knowing Morrison, the highly intelligent, extremely well read, rather perceptive and analytical soul that he was, he’d probably state the awful clear truth of what’s a’ happening over there, here and everywhere rather more harshly and dynamically today. Man, I wish he didn’t die, that James Douglas Morrison. We need you now. No, really. There's maybe not a single artist in the public mind today, that has a damn thing of any worth or authenticity to say about what should be the major subject: Islam. It is as they say, beyond their ken.

What’s the buzz? Tell me what’s a happening? It’s a disaster in Eurabia etc, and the disaster is on a permanent world tour, kid.


The Celebration of the Lizard. Jim Morrison and the Doors.

Lions in the street and roaming
Dogs in heat, rabid, foaming
A beast caged in the heart of a city

The body of his mother
Rotting in the summer ground
He fled the town

He went down South and crossed the border
Left the chaos and disorder
Back there over his shoulder

One morning he awoke in a green hotel
With a strange creature groaning beside him
Sweat oozed from its shiny skin

Is everybody in?
The ceremony is about to begin

Wake up!
You can't remember where it was

Had this dream stopped?

The snake was pale gold
Glazed and shrunken
We were afraid to touch it

The sheets were hot dead prisons
And she was beside me
Old, she's not, young
Her dark red hair
Her white soft skin

Now, run to the mirror in the bathroom
Look!
I can't live thru each slow century of her moving
I let my cheek slide down
The cool smooth tile
Feel the good cold stinging blood
The smooth hissing snakes of rain . . .

Once I had, a little game
I liked to crawl back into my brain
I think you know the game I mean
I mean the game called 'go insane'

Now you should try this little game
Just close your eyes forget your name
Forget the world forget the people
And we'll erect a different steeple

This little game is fun to do
Just close your eyes no way to lose
And I'm right there I'm going to
Release control we're breaking thru

Way back deep into the brain
Back where there's never any pain
And the rain falls gently on the town
And over the heads of all of us

And in the labyrinth of streams
Beneath, the quiet unearthly presence of
Nervous hill dwellers in the gentle hills around
Reptiles abounding
Fossils, caves, cool air heights

Each house repeats a mold
Windows rolled

Beast car locked in against morning
All now sleeping

Rugs silent, mirrors vacant
Dust blind under the beds of lawful couples
Wound in sheets
And daughters, smug
With semen eyes in their nipples

Wait
There's been a slaughter here
(Don't stop to speak or look around

Your gloves and fan are on the ground
We're getting out of town
We're going on the run
And you're the one I want to come)

Not to touch the earth
Not to see the sun
Nothing left to do, but
Run, run, run
Let's run

House upon the hill
Moon is lying still
Shadows of the trees
Witnessing the wild breeze
C'mon baby run with me
Let's run

Run with me
Run with me
Run with me
Let's run

The mansion is warm, at the top of the hill
Rich are the rooms and the comforts there
Red are the arms of luxuriant chairs
And you won't know a thing till you get inside

Dead president's corpse in the driver's car
The engine runs on glue and tar
C'mon along, we're not going very far
To the East to meet the Czar

Some outlaws lived by the side of the lake
The minister's daughter's in love with the snake
Who lives in a well by the side of the road
Wake up, girl! We're almost home

Sun, sun, sun
Burn, burn, burn
Soon, soon, soon
Moon, moon, moon
I will get you
Soon!
Soon!
Soon!

Let the carnival bells ring
Let the serpent sing
Let everything

We came down
The rivers and highways
We came down from
Forests and falls

We came down from
Carson and Springfield
We came down from
Phoenix enthralled

And I can tell you
The names of the Kingdom
I can tell you
The things that you know

Listening for a fistful of silence
Climbing valleys into the shade

I am the Lizard King. I can do anything

I can make the earth stop in its tracks
I made the blue cars go away

For seven years I dwelt
In the loose palace of exile
Playing strange games
With the girls of the island

Now I have come again
To the land of the fair, and the strong, and the wise

Brothers and sisters of the pale forest
O Children of Night
Who among you will run with the hunt?

Now Night arrives with her purple legion
Retire now to your tents and to your dreams
Tomorrow we enter the town of my birth
I want to be ready”.

All This And World War Too.

Chuck faces of the mutant freaks of Islamism and saves the free world too late. "If only I could find the nest!" Sadly, they've infiltrated City Hall!

Ah, if only people knew the good old days of Tin Pan Alley are perhaps over. When this asymetrical war's in full swing, it'll be T.S Eliot's alley "where the dead men rot their bones". It'll be oh so late at night...and not a police car in sight.

I was walking down the street one day, in the merry, merry month of May, when I was taken by surprise, by a pair of roguish ey.. He's the man who broke the bank at Monte Carlo! Doing the Lambeth Walk, oh..When you're smiling, when you're smiling, the whole world smiles with..We'll meet again, don't know where, don't know..Somewhere, beyond the sea, somewhere waitng for me, my lover stan..Life is a but a dream, shaboom, sha..Cold grinding grizzly bear jaws hot on your heels. You're alone...




Dear sports, we are currently waiting in the ante-room of World War 1V. The blind war against Islam Murder Inc is shockingly global, but still relatively localised. Like in France, it only takes up over 750 no go zones...

Though not for much longer. It'll be so very dark and profoundly awful when Islam finally gets what it wants. You and I dead and everything we value destroyed and gone. Perhaps as we near such a point of no return, the millions of deluded and clueless Western dhimmi fools will finally be able to see things as they really are. But I wouldn’t count on it. Because we're kind of already on the Istanbul Express, so to speak.

I can still do that? I mean, speak? Actually it's illegal to express the empirical facts of Islam/Mohammad/Koran. Much of the freaks beyond belief UN, are just itching to ratify it globally. It will be a crime to touch or approach Islam in any way but with insane abasement, grovelling or while drooling PC bullshit.

"The snake was pale gold. Glazed and shrunken. We were afraid to touch it". Jim Morrison. The Celebration of the Lizard.

I can dig it. Mohammad the reptile King, now he can do anything. Everything but the positive. Especially when our own local governments will swallow, endorse and enforce proto Sharia on their own initiative and without prompting! Now that's dhimmi franchising for you.

In this er, spirit, I’ve posted a collection of five or more easy pieces on the death trick that is Islam. I could have easily selected from any of another thousand random news items, or another, or another. That 24 hour Islamist/Muslim news cycle sure is something, eh?

[Full articles via links.] Via the fantastic Gathering Storm Blogspot newsletter and this rather useful intro:

“Winds of War: The Battle Over the Mind.

Here's some disturbing news that only supports my contention that this war between two civilizations - the free world and Islam - is not over territory as such, but over men's minds. In a recent article in the UK Telegraph, the reporter writes that significant numbers of white Britons have been lured into Islamic terrorism, according to a Whitehall report.

"Details of the document, which have emerged in the week before the first anniversary of the July 7 London Tube bombings, also reveal that white converts and other British Muslims are joining a "terrorist career path" after being targeted by radicalist recruiters at universities or by extremist preachers. The report follows calls made by al-Qaeda in April last year for white converts to become suicide bombers because it was easier for them to travel and evade detection before carrying out their attacks."

The lure of the Islamist agenda attracts not only middle-eastern and Asian converts but has reached into the minds of the white western culture as well. This struggle between a 21st century modern mindset and a 13th century ideology has little to do with what is called the battle over the 'soul of Islam'. There is a more devious Islamist agenda afoot which this blog tries to expose every day. That is the intimidation, infiltration and disinformation tactics being used surreptitiously and not so surreptitiously against us and seeks to install the Islamist agenda throughout the world".

Daniel Pipes calls it the threat of 'lawful Islam'.

"Terrorism is one method to advance these projects but it is not the only one. Indeed, the activities of nonviolent Islamists arguably will prove a more effective tactic in the long term. For while the public intuitively understands the threat of terrorism and is mobilized by it, and while states have well-developed institutions (law enforcement, intelligence agencies, the military, the justice system) to protect and fight against it, the activities of nonviolent extremists are not alarming and institutions do not exist to deal with this problem."

You can view a sample list of these lawful Islamist tactics at his Islamic Watch website. So what do we do about it? The Truth Project blog has some suggestions.

1. Print business cards which contain a web link or two. Leave those cards in public places, such as bus stops, restaurants, malls, grocery stores, etc. (See sample business card below)

2. Contact your public library system. Donate books which tell the unvarnished truth about Islam. Donations are tax deductible!

3. Contact your alma mater to see if you can place books in the institution's library. If you are a member of an alumni association, you might already have an "in" to place materials.

4. Contact private schools in your area to see about the feasibility of placing materials.

5. Review the social studies textbooks used in your school district. If you find errors about Islam in those books, contact the curriculum specialist in your school district, and, using reference materials which tell the truth, specify the errors.

6. Check with your school district to see if textbook changes are in the works. If so, as a resident of that district, you have the right to review the textbooks. Contact the curriculum specialist if you find the books are whitewashing Islam.

7. If you are affiliated with a church, be on the alert for whitewash of Islam. Speak up if your spiritual leader is uneducated as to the truth about Islam.

8. Contact your political representatives and disabuse them of the politically-correct whitewash of Islam. Keep contacting your political representatives.

Above all, don't keep quiet about what you've learned!”

“Father, brothers shoot girl in court. The Daily Times Monitor.

LAHORE: A 17-year-old girl was shot dead by her brothers and father while in police custody in Sahiwal on Wednesday. According to Dawn News, Sara alias Nusrat Bibi had appeared in the Sahiwal Sessions Court to seek the dissolution of her marriage. She was married in 2001 when she was just a 9-year-old. However, she had subsequently filed a petition in the court seeking to dissolve her marriage, against the will of her brothers and father. The court had given the decision in her favour. Her brothers and father shot and killed her as she left the courtroom".


From the Anti-Jihad League of America, a massive and outstanding essay with great links on Islamism, Beslan and children.

“Our Hope, Our Children, Our Responsibility in Fighting Jihad. By Jeffrey Imm on September 3, 2008.

As children return to schools, we are reminded that they are our hope for the future, but they are also the target of Islamic supremacists around the world. We need to defend the future, hopes, and lives of these children, and assume the "grown-up" duty as responsible adults for defending them from the ideology of Islamic supremacism and Jihadist terrorism.

On September 1, 2004, 770 children were kidnapped by Jihadists in Russia in a small town of Beslan. It was a return to school for these children at Beslan School Number One; the event was celebrated as a "Day of Knowledge," and parents accompanied their children in the joyous return to school. After lining up for photographs to remember the day, children entered the school. So did Jihadists who rushed into Beslan School Number One, while the children were filing into classes. Many of the older children who saw the Jihadists were able to flee. Most of those left behind were the smallest, youngest children, including parents with their babies. Jihadists sought to lure back confused children, uncertain if they should flee, with candy".


Welcome to ‘Lawfare' - A New Type of Jihad by Brooke Goldstein. Family Security Matters April 14, 2008. Via Islam Watch.

"The Islamist movement has two wings – one violent and one lawful, which can operate apart but often reinforce each other. While the violent arm attempts to silence speech by burning cars when cartoons of Mohammed are published in Denmark, the lawful arm is skillfully maneuvering within Western legal systems, both here and abroad.

Islamists with financial means have launched a "legal Jihad," filing frivolous and malicious lawsuits with the aim of abolishing public discourse critical of Islam and with the goal of establishing principles of Sharia law (strict Islamic law dating back to the 9th Century) as the governing political and legal authority in the West.
Islamist Lawfare is often predatory, filed without a serious expectation of winning, and undertaken as a means to intimidate, demoralize and bankrupt defendants. The lawsuits range in their claims from defamation to workplace harassment and they have resulted in books being pulped and meritorious articles going unpublished".

Fear Stalks Muslim Apostates in the West by David J. Rusin. American Thinker August 3, 2008.

Persuading Western Muslim leaders to repudiate Shari'a-sanctioned violence against apostates can be a frustrating exercise, as Prince Charles discovered in 2004. Troubled by the treatment of Muslims who convert to Christianity in Islamic nations, the prince convened a summit of senior figures from both religious communities. It ended in disappointment. The Islamic representatives failed to issue a declaration condemning the practice, which the Christians had requested; they also cautioned non-Muslims not to discuss such matters in public, arguing that moderates would be more likely to make progress if the debate were kept internal.

Bishop Michael Nazir-Ali, the outspoken Anglican prelate of Rochester, attended the meeting but rejected their advice. While continuing to highlight the perils faced by those who leave Islam in countries like Saudi Arabia and Iran, he now has turned his focus to the harassment of apostates in the West. Last year the bishop warned that a convert could die in Britain unless prominent Muslims affirm the right of all people to change their faith. There have been few takers, despite the dire need for this message: a poll indicates that 36% of younger British Muslims believe death to be an appropriate punishment for renouncing Islam.

Their views are grounded in Shari'a law. All major schools of Islamic jurisprudence stipulate that a sane adult male must be put to death for abandoning Islam, though varying interpretations persist on whether females should be killed or merely imprisoned. Many Islamic states outlaw apostasy and seven list it as a capital offense. However, freelancers such as angry relatives present the greatest danger to ex-Muslims, as Sunni and Shiite scholars largely agree that Shari'a empowers individuals to punish converts. This tradition has followed Muslims to the Western world.

Europe or Eurabia? by Daniel Pipes. The Australian. April 15, 2008.

"The future of Europe is in play. Will it turn into "Eurabia," a part of the Muslim world? Will it remain the distinct cultural unit it has been over the last millennium? Or might there be some creative synthesis of the two civilizations?
The answer has vast importance. Europe may constitute a mere 7 percent of the world's landmass but for five hundred years, 1450-1950, for good and ill, it was the global engine of change. How it develops in the future will affect all humanity, and especially daughter countries such as Australia which still retain close and important ties to the old continent.

I foresee potentially one of three paths for Europe: Muslims dominating, Muslims rejected, or harmonious integration.

(1) Muslim domination strikes some analysts as inevitable. Oriana Fallaci found that "Europe becomes more and more a province of Islam, a colony of Islam." Mark Steyn argues that much of the Western world "will not survive the twenty-first century, and much of it will effectively disappear within our lifetimes, including many if not most European countries." Such authors point to three factors leading to Europe's Islamization: faith, demography, and a sense of heritage.

The secularism that predominates in Europe, especially among its elites, leads to alienation about the Judeo-Christian tradition, empty church pews, and a fascination with Islam. In complete contrast, Muslims display a religious fervor that translates into jihadi sensibility, a supremacism toward non-Muslims, and an expectation that Europe is waiting for conversion to Islam".

EU High Court Invalidates Sanctions Against Al Qaeda. By Jonathan Winer.
"
In a devastating blow to existing international financial sanctions against terrorist groups, the EU's highest court has today overturned the sanctions program imposed by the European Union on Osama bin Laden, Al-Qaeda and the Taliban. The ruling by the European Court of Justice annulled the EU's freezing of the funds of Yassin Al-Kadi, a Saudi businessman who has been on terrorist financier black-lists since his listing as a "Specially Designated Global Terrorist" by the U.S. Treasury in October 2001".

Middle Eastern crime in Australia via the great Tim Priest, by Nemesis at Islam Monitor.

"For some time now a handful of ex police officers, like Tim Priest who was a Detective Sergeant in the NSW Police Force, have been writing and lecturing to any one who wishes to listen on the rise of Middle Eastern Crime (MEC) in this country.

Most ‘aware’ officers working in and around Sydney during the mid to late 90’s became familiar with the type of crime that Middle Eastern gangs were starting to concentrate on such as vehicle theft, armed robbery and smash and grab raids. Any police force is only as good as the information its intelligence services can gather on organized crime or criminals in general. The downside, of course, when collating reliable information for which police act on, is the amount of time taken to gather that information.

While there was an awareness at Senior Police level, of the rise of crime related incidents involving Middle Eastern gangs before the Royal Commission of 1996 was convened, it was the advent of that Commission that put the investigation of these gangs onto the back burner. Senior Police decided that until the fallout from the Commission had been fully assessed nothing further was to be done".

Jihad in plain sight. A truly great official white paper on Islamist Jihad by Andrew C. McCarthy. [PDF file.]

The awesome Christopher Hitchens on the inversion of news from Iraq by much of the MSM.

“One day I will publish my entire collection of upside-down Iraq headlines, where the true purport of the story is the inverse of the intended one. (Top billing thus far would go to the greatest downer of them all: the tale of Iraq's unemployed gravediggers, their always-insecure standard of living newly imperiled by the falling murder rate. You don't believe me? Wait for the forthcoming anthology.) While you wait, you might consider last week's astonishing report about the Iraqi budget surplus and the way in which the report was reported".

Via Mesopotamia West with cool links. Howard Rotberg: Fighting Soft Jihad.

"It's not just Ezra Levant being targeted by the new wave of soft jihad, here's another individual who refuses to be a victim, Howard Rotbert. He's just gone through a bizarre trial instigated by a Muslim Chapters employee who recanted at the last moment.

One can expect more of these character-assassinations from Muslim activists in the future, but what I have problems with was the response by Chapters' owner, Heather Reisman. In effect she ran a secret trial all of her own and declared Rotberg guilty with no evidence".

Exclusive: As the West Sleep, Islamists Work on Establishing a Worldwide Islamic State.

“Hadith of Hate” Banned at USC. Islamic Infiltrators in the West.

"The commentary below by Daniel Pipes illustrates the daunting challenge we in the West face in dealing with the threat of Islamist infiltration of our government and intelligence agencies.

If government officials are deemed as too aggressive in doing background checks of Muslims who seek such positions, they are met with the predictable cry of “discrimination” and “Islamophobia.”

If they are not aggressive or thorough enough in their background checks, radical Islamists slip through and gain access to classified intelligence information that could compromise critical anti-terrorism investigations – putting us at greater risk.

But the blame for this situation does not lie with Americans who are concerned about national security and demand exhaustive background checks of Muslims, and the “victims” are not Muslims who claim they are being discriminated against or treated unfairly.

The blame lies first with those millions of Muslims who are intent on waging jihad against us, whether through violent means or cultural subversion".

Muslim appeasement has crippled India. August 30, 2008 at 12:51 am. Via Secular India Wordpress.

"Thanks to UPA government’s policy of soft borders, Pak-Bangla nationals are infiltrating into India every-day changing the demographic map of various states in the country. And even before perpetrators of 1993 bomb blasts in Mumbai could be punished, Mumbai faced fresh blasts on July 11, 2006 in trains which claimed about two hundred lives.

By J.G. Arora.

Genocide and eviction of Hindus from Kashmir to be made refugees in their own country; frequent Pak-Bangla sponsored terrorist attacks on security forces, civilians and temples; continuation of Article 370 conferring a special status on Muslim majority Jammu and Kashmir; infiltration of crores of Pak-Bangla nationals into India to create one more Islamic country on Indian soil represent the bitter harvest of this suicidal appeasement.

Congress government under Jawaharlal Nehru started “Haj subsidy” for Muslims in 1959 though such subsidy is anti-secular and though none of the 57 Muslim countries pays any such subsidy.

A large majority of Indian Muslims who demanded Pakistan for Muslims and exchange of population on creation of Pakistan stayed back in India, and did not go to Pakistan.
Sir Winston Churchill said, “An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last”. Though India is being devoured bit by bit every day by its tormentors, India continues to appease them. Poisonous politics of appeasement has crippled India and ravaged its body and soul".

New Saudi Fatwa allows Cheating on Kafir women. Via Infidels Are Cool.

"Surprise! Another reason to be accused of being Islamophobic!

A recent Saudi Islamic fatwa (permit) says: Saudis who study out of Saudi Arabia like America have the Islamic permit to married a western girl by intending to leave her after a short time for just intercourse and when he will come back to Saudi he must divorce her and all that without telling her the truth at all.

They mean that a Saudi student, who study abroad, can lie to a kafir girl that he loves her and want to marry her in order to have sexual relation with her. But when he has finished his studies, he must divorce her before he coming back to Saudi Arabia.

Islam teaches lying and cheating on others especially on non-Muslims. I was Muslim from Saudi Arabia. I know well how bad and liar Muslims are. Innocent non-Muslim girls must be saved from the deceptive traps of Muslims, especially from Saudi ones".

Lies and wilful delusions so factually absurd, that only professionals can believe them.

Senior lecturer in strategic studies, Clinton Fernandes, brushes up on his Islamic studies. Rest assured sports, Australian security is in intelligent hands, however hairy the palms.




Dig. You know in Pakistan, the ‘Stan brimming with nukes and diahorea, they sell mobile phones freely with pictures of 9/11 and Osama Bin Laden, the shit of the desert, printed on them? Pakistan is an unstable, sinking abyss of Islamism and a terrifying madhouse where thousands go to fully train for their Jihad franchise, ready for export and infiltration. It seems that the very people we should be able to trust and turn to for muscular and intelligent security attitudes, are curiously lacking.

Speaking of myopia and counter clockwise spinning eyes, I went to my optometrist and spotted the latest edition of The Bulletin for September 04 2008. That’s the Australian publication that imagines it cuts it but doesn’t really, much like the long time gone and negligible, Time Magazine.

Two bits from an article titled The Dark Web, on cyber Jihad etc, grabbed me by some utterly beyond belief statements. I'll Fisk the second bit in the following post, sports.

From The Bulletin: “Clinton Fernandes, a senior lecturer in strategic studies at the Australian Defence Force Academy and a former Army Intelligence officer, says auto-radicalisation begins with a sense of loneliness and alienation from mainstream society. On the Internet, such people can fall victims to perverted Islam”.

Colonel Neville: Hey, "...perverted Islam?". Right on! I hear ya. Can I quote you on that? At least Clint got something right. One is not a victim if you choose something like Islam Murder Inc.,because you like and enjoy it.

Au contraire, it's the other people that Islamist Muslims behead and blow up everyday that are clearly to the non-deluded and sane, the empirical victims here. And they probably didn't even ask for a bad case of sudden death via the religion of peace.

We and the dead are the true victims and don't you ever forget it. Maybe that's something to remember at those all important strategic meetings? Gee, maybe that's why Dante cast Mohammad the stratospheric pervert into the 9th Circle of Hell...

Yes, "lonely" like Osama the 200 million dollar ex-playboy with 76 siblings? Islamist radicalisation begins 99% of the time with that essential ingredient, a Muslim. How so? Because Islam is a radical and total doctrine of perpetual war. Hence the screaming and rivers of blood.

One is not alienated from mainstream Muslim society in an Islamic state if one is an Islamist. You are most likely to be the government or a government employee, an alleged spiritual leader, wealthy or one of the average Ummah Muslim masses. It’s the dumb monicker of “moderates” and the minority voices of modernity who are the alienated and “lonely” ones.

Clint, your premise is empirically wrong. It’s a perfect fit for phony PC wishful thinking though, and thus is entirely bogus and useless. How crap and how many light years off exactly? Let’s see, shall we?

Clint: “Australian Muslim community leaders are correct in saying that Muslim radicals aren’t reflecting Islam’s teachings,” he says. “Just as you wouldn’t try to understand violent revolutionaries by reading Karl Marx...you shouldn’t try to understand Muslim radicals by reading the Koran”.

Mohammad: “I am made triumphant through terror”.

Colonel Neville: I know. Re-read that last bit of Clint's again. It's slightly surreal the first time around. What is an Australian Muslim community leader exactly, anyway? It means precisely nothing as there are no standards that must be met that I know of, only fraud that must be tolerated. Anyone can be a "Muslim Community Leader" apparently, as long as they don’t actually behead anyone live on an SBS chat show.

I have not seen an alleged "Muslim Community Leader" yet, that was not revealed by startlingly easy research as completely full of shit.

“...aren’t reflecting Islam’s teaching?” Really? Well, that would make those alleged leaders either absurdly clueless about their own er, faith, or classic Islamist taquiyaa pushing liars in hyper deception overdrive, wooden tit?

What are those teachings exactly and who came up with them Clint? It was Mohammad. Have you heard of him? You know, the 7th century warlord, mass murdering Jew hater, rapist and paedophile. It was in all the papyruses.

Clint, have you actually read the Krazy Koran? Start here at Faith Freedom Org. It's run by ex-Muslims. If known, all ex-Muslims face the permanent threat of death. Then buy a few best sellers on Islam and Mohammad by that great scholar Robert Spencer over at Jihad Watch.

If you read the turgid, crude and almost unreadable pages of the Muslim holy book, you can clearly see that it is stuffed full of explicitly and clear instructions for deception, oppression, murder and warfare on a permanent, massive and apocalyptic scale. The Koran is a total doctrine for Islamic life and death, and a hideously effective manual for how to wage war and the art of deception.

Clint: “...you wouldn’t try to understand violent revolutionaries by reading Karl Marx?!”

Colonel Neville: Actually I would, and most valid historians would too. Gee, we better let Cuba, North Korea, China and remnant Communists in Russia know that they weren’t really inspired by Karl the pervert. Sheesh.

Are you kidding me or are you more deluded than General Custer when he said “Men, when we get to Little Big Horn, we’ll get out the picnic baskets?”

Violent revolution is Marxist. Marxism is violent revolution.

That’s the point. Communism is based on mass murder, lies, conformity, envy, spite and insanity. Marx had most of these attributes, apart from never conforming enough to normality or decency, to give a damn about anyone else, and being limited to not being able to actually murder anyone. But he did abstract about the method, and how to experiment to one’s heart content on millions of living people. What a matinee idol he was. A real sweetheart. No.

Clint: “...you shouldn’t try to understand Muslim radicals by reading the Koran”.

Colonel Neville: Er, why? He doesn’t really say evidence wise. But he's right, we mustn't. Because then the awful, awful truth would be terrifyingly revealed for all to see. And for the PC infected, the truth is always the wrong thing to say about Islam. So maybe let me go through such classic Logical Fallacy.

So you should never seek to understand anything by going to it's source? Check. Gotcha. Balls. Tell it to Norman Podhoretz, P.J O'Rourke, David Horowitz, Mark Steyn, Jonah Goldberg, Robert Spencer, Churchill, General Patton, Oriana Fallaci, Christopher Hitchens, Socrates, Isaac Newton, Einstein and Stephen Hawking.

How do I understand you? Addled er, thinking is it? Good luck then. Maybe I should read Advanced Psychiatry 101? Or Dhimmi Boobs for Beginners? These look good:

Wilful Stupidity in the Military and Government: Its Sources, Effects and Solutions.
Sanity On Three Crazy Pills a Day: I’m Sane, You’re Insane, and It’s All Good!
Accidental Treason by Pre-Surrendering: How We’re All Doomed.
Are You Mediocre Enough to Join Today’s Army Intelligence?
Islam and Loving It: How To Cut Off Your Own Head Before They Do.

You cannot understand Muslim radicals without reading the Koran. It’s their How To Manual. The Koran/Mohammad and Islam, [they are all one] state clearly and for all time, that anyone who questions the Koran is a blasphemer and must be killed.

Do you seriously think that the massive Muslim global enthusiasm for Jihad, the only purpose of which is to spread Islam by war all over the world, is somehow energised by a few odd lines allegedly “cherry-picked” from the Koran? Are you nuts or jiving me, man? Share your opinion with Islamist loons regarding what motivates Islamist loons to be Islamist loons, and they’ll kick your ass.

Clint: “In fact, radicals aren’t theologians, and they don’t respect community leaders. They practice a do-it yourself vision of the little that they do read. This is akin to youngsters who don’t buy a whole music album, but cherry-pick the songs they like and download only those”.

Colonel Neville: Good grief and Jesus H. Christ. Actually, with that attitude, radicals and moderates will never respect you. You seem to know millions of radicals personally and apparently they don't add up to much, according to you. So nothing to worry about then?

NOW HEAR THIS! ALL HANDS ON DECK! IT'S THE THEOLOGY THAT MAKES THE RADICAL.

Add the dysfunctional culture and hey presto! And not the alleged petro trillions poverty, bogus history, the Jews or any thousands of blah, blah excuses. How come Japan and Germany no longer fight or hate the West? Why don't England and America fight and hate each other? Why don't the French, the English and the Spanish still go to war?

There are no unique Muslim gripes except for the sheer whining idiot loser extreme volume of them.

And hey, those "alienated" and "lonely" Muslim "victims" seemed pretty effective the last time I looked. Clint's posture of seemingly discounting our mortal enemy as rather pathetic and inherently inferior losers, reminds me of the fall of Singapore. Yes, those Japanese were spindly legged little weirdos who could never mount a serious threat, what?!

Ah, your theology canard. The Ayatollah Khomeini is considered a major spiritual leader, an Islamic scholar and a theologian. He was a true Muslim Community leader! He quoted the Koran and knew it well, like millions of Islamist Imams, who are the high command of Islam. Who the Hell do you think makes up the insanely violent Islamist theocracy of Iran? Fuller Brush salesmen?

Old Khomeini also was on permmanent violent Jihad. The only kind and he inspired and inspires millions and milions and millions, just like Osama, Hezbollah and Hamas etc. Among the Ayotollah's many colourful thoughts, were his detailed instructions for raping infant girls.

The theological is all these nuts often know. That and terror tactics. You on the other hand, seem to know next to nothing for some reason about the core facts of Islam. So it's PC shibboleths on the very subject you have taken an oath to protect Australia from? Can you see my point? I’m just a guitar player, but you get paid to be right everytime, all the time. Go figure. You must be good at something. Get professional help. Oh, you are professional? Too bad. Maybe I can show you some cool arpeggios?

Clint: “...akin to youngsters who don’t buy a whole music album,...”

Colonel Neville: Er, no. It ain’t. Nada. Comparing the music listening habits of regular teenagers to the mentality and behaviour of Islamist terrorist mega freak killers and perverts, is one of the most bizarre things you’ve said, Clint. And the competition for that prize is fierce. What did the average post-Napster kid ever do to you, exactly?

Clint: “Radical Internet forums are in a sense an internal discussion about Muslims, and Australian Muslims should be encouraged to participate in these discussions where they can challenge the cherry-picked version of Islam that gets bandied about”.

Colonel Neville: Yes, "...bandied about" and “...an internal discussion?” Ya putting me on, right?

No one is discussing a damn thing. This is not a high school debate and there is entirely nothing to negotiate. Don’t you get it? Osama Bin Laden doesn’t want anything except our death. I guess you can't get more "internal" than slicing into someone's neck and murdering school children, eh?

Maybe we should encourage online discussions with rapists, murderers, peadophiles and bank robbers? Then we can "challenge" their er, "ideas!" Er, and isn't it entirely illegal or at least unethical to communicate in this way with such creeps? Give me a fucking break.

Osama is a simple man with simple desires. He just wants the whole world to be Islamic whatever it takes. As does Iran’s President Armachimphead, with the beyond belief caveat that he must of course first start a massive conflict that will then usher in the 12th Imam, who will then apparently return to destroy the Jews and Infidels etc, ad nauseum. You can visit a covered well in Iran, where the little guy is allegedly waiting for the big day...I kid you not. Take the tour.

Islamists only have one demand and that is that we die. And it seems that many in the surprisingly still free West are going to help arrange their own execution. God help us all.

Hey, a minority of courageous Muslims like on MemriTV org, do challenge Islamist freaks rather regularly. They are then mostly uniformly ignored, criticised and hated by the Western media and the Left etc. And in the Islamic world, they are routinely threatened with death, at least up until they're actually murdered.

Reading The Fernades Statements, gave me the feeling of standing on sinking mud in a Hall of Mirrors.

“This can’t be real! It’s all wrong yet familiar, and so strangely distorted... It’s a madhouse! A bloody madhouse!”

Nope, it’s just our far too often as per usual dhimmi security and cultural suicide courtesy of our stupid authorities, phony closed MSM and PC Leftard multi-cultism indoctrinating education system. So everything is steady as she goes then? Oh, and it will eventually.



[Stay tuned for Part 2 in the next post.]

Roland Jabbour jabbers in the freaking sewer of Hezbollah TV.

Roland Jabbour in drag, shows some possible station promo slogans for Al Manar, the premier Hezbollah station on your dial! Wake up to the great breakfast feel of Islamic insanity! All this week, watch for your chance to win a rocket launcher and a romantic getaway for two lucky homicide/suicide bombers in love! Think Islamic terrorists and think romance and fun, fun, fun!





Hey, ya know there’s an Australian Arab Council? How bazaar. Boom tish! Anyway, they’re a fun site, if you dig the usual humourless tripe of blame shifting and Jew hatred. Apparently the sandwiches are good. They’re Kosher.

From the ACC on Palestine:

“For over 50 years now, the Palestinians have been subject to a harsh and inhumane Israeli rule. As Australians, we urge the government to work towards an unconditional end to Israel’s continuing, and illegitimate, violations of Palestinian human rights”.

Colonel Neville: Gee, what a surprise. No mention of the Palestinians living under the gangster child killer perverts of Hamas and decades under Arafat the manipulative super liar, embezzler closet gay and out of the closet hijacker. And golly, no mention of virtually every Middle East poop pile taking turns at trying to kill all Jews and destroy Israel. Maybe a typo?

Here’s the AAC on Iraq. Oh yes. I fixed a few speeling mistakes. They may need to update by about several years I believe:

“The AAC has worked hard to heighten awareness in Australia of the effects of sanctions on the Iraq people, and advocated for the lifting of the sanctions to facilitate rebuilding of infrastructure and the availability of medicines and essential services”.

Colonel Neville: Funny, I don’t remember a lot of Arab condemnation of Saddam over his thirty odd year totalitarian fascistic reign. It must have been on the funny pages. I love that Bristow. Isn’t he great?

Yes, the Arab nations did so much to free the Iraqi’s and build a civil society. Though I guess you can’t get more focused on Iraqi families than blowing up their pet markets, schools and child slavery, can you?

But enough laughs courtesy of the Arab Aluminium Siding Council. What got my sickened attention, like stumbling across a traditional Middle Eastern castrated boys market, was the following story of how unbelievably, Indonesia kindly beams the Hezbollah run TV station Al Manar into Australia. You know Indonesia? The majority Muslim neo-vortex and unstable neighbour of 200 million people to our North.

I dunno. I feel that Hezbollah setting up shop comfortably in Indonesia says it all, really. What muscular reaction are we a’ flexing about it? Search me. Maybe we’re threatening to put starch in the shorts the Indonesian Embassy staff.



From Naomi Levin. Australian Jewish News.

“B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission president John Searle criticised remarks by the chairman of the Australian Arabic Council.

The chairman of the Australian Arabic Council (AAC) has been accused of breaching the Racial Discrimination Act with comments he made about the Hezbollah-run television station al-Manar, which continues to be broadcast in Australia”.

Colonel Neville: Yes, the Act that has brought us all so much closer together by forbidding any critical analysis of mere ideas.

Judaism, Christianity, Buddhism and most every other belief has weathered and grown from long periods of criticism, except for Islam. Islam wouldn’t likely last the year as it is if it was seriously exposed for what it is. To critique Islam is to reveal that it's completely 100% hideous and utterly irredeemable. Thus ANY criticism is unacceptable. Any honest analysis if accepted, would destroy the mountain of lies and shit that is Islam.

Now I do mind what people say, but as long as they can be answered, dismantled and if required, completely destroyed in the free market of ideas and truth, I can dig it. And if fully armed and dangerous and supporting of those that are, that’s a different angle entirely, innit?

Islamism is like Nazism and Communism, in how it effectively uses our open society so effectively as the very tool with which to destroy it.

“Roland Jabbour told The AJN last week that he stands by the comments he made to The Age (21/08), that in the context of Israel’s “crimes”, it was acceptable for al-Manar to call Jewish people “the offspring of apes and pigs” and to resurrect the ancient myth of blood libel.

Colonel Neville: Nice. Well, he would. Israel's "crimes", eh? At least he’s a seemingly consistent as per usual apparent Islamist creep, the apes and pigs being a core view of the Krazy Koran an' all. Ok, caveat number A9/12G. Not all Muslims are creeps. Of course not. Muslims have no choice. Most are just like you and I, if we were Muslims...

That blood libel and apes/pigs drivel are core fantasy’s for the fuel of Muslim fanaticism. Islam itself is the engine. Always has been. The little engine that could.

“I said you need to see those comments in the context of the State of Israel and the ongoing conflict in the region. I thought it was reasonable,” Jabbour told The AJN”.

Colonel Neville: The only er, “context” is that this is the reality of the morally and intellectually retarded mind set of millions of Muslims worldwide towards the Jewish people.

Funny isn’t it, how the criminal minds of the fraudulent and irrational like to protest their utter inhumanity is er, “reasonable?” Before this, Rolland Jabber was I imagine, one of those moderate community leaders we hear so much about, but never actually witness. Rollover Jibber is merely a classic standard Islamist mediocrity. The chances of Jabs coming up with an original idea of any positive merit are it seems, precisely zero.

“He said that while he would never speak about Jewish people like that, “we need to see [the comments] as directed to the State of Israel, not directed to Jews”.

Colonel Neville: Oh, that's all ok then. No. Er, isn’t the state of Israel made up of er, Jews? What a phony. What a sleazebag. What a Hezbollah fan.

“He said that in broadcasting anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views into Australia, the network was exercising its right to free speech".

Colonel Neville: Er, no. Bollocks. And the key words are “broadcasting anti-Semitic and anti-Israel views into Australia”. Yeah anyone can babble on here as many obviously can, and I for one will always defend their right to be a dirty pro-Islamist fucker and a Jew hating geek. Though I would never say that.

Ah, the absurdity and fraud of a clueless Islamist mind is a thing to behold. Sadly, for many millions, the concepts of depth, decency, truth, maturity and the rational, go right over their heads and interest them not. Just following the ravings of Mohammad like blind mice into an abyss of bigotry, ignorance, dysfunction and violence is the thang for millions of Muslims. What it must be like to live there for healthy, regular folks, I can only almost never read about.

But I digress.

“By supporting a station to be aired in Australia, we are not supporting the things that it says, we are simply saying that if somebody says something that we are not happy with, then that is the whole issue with freedom of expression,” Jabbour argued”.

Colonel Neville: Excellent Taquiyaa there, Jabby. What a shithead sheik. All total lies and nonsense of course. Like many a boob, he can’t come out completely and say it. Yet. It's a God damned Hezbollah station!

“The broadcaster, he said, was not supporting terrorism, but he concurred that Hezbollah, a proscribed terrorist group in Australia, operated the station”.

Colonel Neville: Oh, nuance. He was not? But he does then? What a phony. What perverted logic. What a schlemiel. What went wrong? We caved, baby.

“Peta Jones Pellach, an expert in interfaith relations, said that Judaism does not believe free speech is an “overriding right”. “Speech is described as a powerful force that must be exercised with restraint and sensitivity,” she said.

Colonel Neville: I beg to differ. What’s needed is a more ass kicking response. Or AAC kicking response. What a shower of sheesh. Lift the rock off and out they scuttle.

“Pellach said that if Jabbour believed in free speech, he should use it for good, rather than evil”.

Colonel Neville: Yeah, that's also one of my favourite Maxwell Smart lines about a KAOS scientist who developed an ear wax that killed! And even more unlikely.

Jabs doesn’t believe in frickin’ free speech. That my dear is what is known a broad daylight ploy and diversionary tactic. Concentrate on what Muslims do, not on what they say, per se.

But other than that trip down suppressed memory lane, Pellach sadly sounds well, lame. El Lame O, actually. And this is the problem. Why the measured and polite tea party responses to such a toilet sneak as Jabber the what the fuck?

It’s kinda like this:

“Dear London Times: I very rarely put pen to paper, but I feel in this instance I just had to! This Mr Goebbels fellow being allowed on the radio has offended all sense of proprietry and good manners when he said he would continue murdering millions in Europe. The man is unbearable.

I demand that the Times asks for a written apology from the Nazi Minister in the strongest possible terms, or both myself and my Aunt Dolly will cancel our subscription forthwith. You have been warned! Yours sincerely, Cyril Peanuts-Farce”.

This is what is known as a dead paradigm scetch. Myself I prefer to call freaky geeks floating in the goat bowels of Mohammedism just "What it is! What it is!" Creepy potato heads that maybe couldn’t make it this far outside of the inbred world of pro-Islamist propaganda mills, like the AAC appears to be, are a boring drag on a good day.

Hey, I could be wrong. Maybe Jabbs is a handsome brute, damn popular with attractive, professional and free feminist women and a real drawcard at parties.

He has a rapier wit and is currently writing what may just turn out to be the Great Arab Novel. Jabs has a light touch in anecdote and a mysterious charisma, that seems to draw the best of the best in the creative and scientific fields to him. Kids love Rolls for his self effacing and irreverent humour. Ya never know. He just happens to be a pro-Hezbollah TV freak as well. Go figure.

“The freedom of speech he enjoys here could much better be used to inform citizens of the Arab world, who do not have access to such information, that this is a scandalous libel and spreading it does not further the cause of the Arab people or Islam.”

Colonel Neville: Yeah, Islamist loons would be so unaware of that. Check. No. Sheesh. This IS spreading the "cause of the Arab people and Islam"[!]

“Meanwhile, the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ) acted in the strongest possible way last week, calling for an urgent meeting with Communications Minister Senator Stephen Conroy to discuss al-Manar’s broadcast in Australia”.

Colonel Neville: Ooh, heavy! Er, no. That’s not really the “strongest possible way” now is it, surely? If that’s all you’ve got, give up now, kid. I for one do not plan to dig my own fucking grave, though many of my fellow citizens nauseatingly seem ready to, by horrible increments of Sharia Creep.

Chuck Heston to Mathias in The Omega Man: “Build coffins. That’s all you’ll need”.

“The letter said that Jabbour’s statements indicated “the insidious influence of al-Manar’s programs and their ability to foment hatred of Jews in Australia”.

Colonel Neville: It ain’t helping, but no. I imagine they mostly foment pre-fomented freaks, really. So what are you going to do that will effectively counter Jibby the er, "anti-Israel" but ha, ha, allegedly not a Jew hating turnip knob then?

Hey, what am I going to do? Like the mass of voiceless citizen patriots, 'eff all effective. Give me a damn column in the AJN and then I can maybe start to take such chuckleheads down a little. Couldn’t hurt.

There are three great conservative libertarian and humorous bloggers in Australia. Or are there? Tim Blair, Andrew Bolt and that Colonel Neville bloke is better. Hey, I could be wrong, but I just enjoyed writing it. Anything for a laugh says I. No, hang on. I am pretty hip and groovy and I’m not fattening or expensive, at least yet.

“The ECAJ also joined with the Zionist Federation of Australia (ZFA) to urge Jabbour to retract his remarks, which they said contravened Part IIa of the Racial Discrimination Act.

“We invite and urge you to dissociate yourself and your council from the remarks and ... to publicly withdraw them and to apologise to the Jewish community for the deep offence and hurt that you have caused,” the letter reads.

Colonel Neville: Yeah, tough words. Or perhaps, “Hey Roland, you stink, ya pro-Hezbollah poop head fuck”. Where's Joe Pesci when ya need him, huh? Rolly should be able to drool what he likes and anyone should be able to answer him freely. That's free speech. Or speach. Or a peach.

“Last week other Jewish groups echoed the ECAJ and ZFA in condemning Jabbour’s comments and calling for a ban of al-Manar. John Searle, president of the B’nai B’rith Anti-Defamation Commission called Jabbour’s comments “dishonest”, “un-Australian” and said they “undermine our multicultural society”.

Colonel Neville: Sorry, but this the intrinsic horror of multiculturalism as it invariably morphs into multi-cultism. We don’t all make daisy chains together cos someone caught a flight over. Multiculturalism as opposed to integration is undermining...of the host culture then everyone else.

“He said Jabbour should apologise or resign from the AAC to “pave the way for the appointment of a chairperson who is capable of working towards a harmonious, multicultural society”.

Colonel Neville: Balls. Dreams of harmony are bound to dissapoint upon waking. Jabbooby should be cut down to size by some serious scribes and so on, and then go fuck himself. Put yourself out there as pro-Hezbollah broadcasting and an example of er, "free speech" and expect a blast, baby. No pun intended.

“Dr Colin Rubenstein, executive director of the Australia/Israel & Jewish Affairs Council, said Jabbour’s comments “reek of fringe extremism”. Dr Danny Lamm, president of the State Zionist Council of Victoria, also condemned Jabbour’s comments and called on the Federal Government to do whatever it could to prevent al-Manar broadcasting into Australia.

Colonel Neville: He ain’t “fringe extremism” exactly. It’s mainstream in much of the Muslim world, wherever that world may be. Though Jabber certainly does reek.

And now a word from my sponsor: For that persistent desert aroma, try Arab Ban. It’s new, from Mecca. The name you can trust.

Ted speaks: “Victoria’s Opposition Leader Ted Baillieu even weighed into the debate, and called on Kevin Rudd to convince the Indonesian government to stop using its satellite to beam al-Manar to Australia”.

Colonel Neville: Good luck then.

“I would encourage the Prime Minister to use his special relationship with the Indonesian government to highlight the dangers of broadcasting networks that incite violence, vilification and terrorist activities,” Baillieu said”.

Colonel Neville: Ah, the old special relationship with a largely corrupt government. That means they try not to laugh when you leave the room. Again, good luck and bon voyage.

“The Australian Communications and Media Authority is currently investigating al-Manar”.

Colonel Neville: Why does that give me so very few feelings of confidence?

Like the confidence I need in a deodorant.

All I need is the air in my head and to love me.

Two women murdered by the Taliban. That's the Muslim Taliban. They are precise followers of Islam as clearly laid down by Mohammad, dig? Hey, if only Jude Law was there to talk to the concerned "parties" about I don't know, the Taliban's goals and aspirations and why can't we all just get along? Just drop your fascist religion! See? Easy! Jude could've made it a real win-win situation. Go Hollywood stars! Only you can make it happen for the millions of people oppressed and murdered by totalitarian Islam. No need for uncool judgementalism. I love those happy endings, don't you?



“They say the Neon lights are bright on Broadway.
They say that there ‘s always magic in the air”.
On Broadway. George Benson does the Drifters.


The lights are bright but the analytical ability is usually dim to out, while the cognitive dissonance often burns brightly. And ditto the curiosity, intellectual rigour, moral honesty and effort required for any serious empirical research of gee, I dunno, Islam. Jude Law, the world famous geopolitical analyst, courageous exposer of the harsh truth of Islamism and terror and the er, Hollywood actor, made a rather bog standard celebrity style statement regarding Afghanistan.

Look, I'm sure Jude cares and means very well, but there's always something wrong with this picture. Know what I mean, Squire? Looking into the abyss of Mohammad is a dirty business, but somebody's gotta do it...

“But when you're walkin' down that street,
And you ain't had enough to eat,
The glitter rubs right off and you're nowhere”.
On Broadway. George Benson does the Drifters.

“British actor Jude Law called for all parties in Afghanistan’s conflict to observe a Peace Day on September 21 as part of a global campaign for ceasefires and non-violence”. Source: Yahoo News.

Colonel Neville: Yes, peace. A word. In the dictionary. Not a precise definition from physics or the periodic table, but a variable term. What does peace mean exactly? Precisely nothing.

"Peace kills". P.J O'Rourke.

The mere absence of war doesn’t necessarily mean peace or anything worth a damn. They have peace in the vast Communist concentration camp of North Korea, in the theocratic hell of Iran, Syria and Saudi Arabia. They have no war per se, in Zimbabwe, Haiti or Cuba.

Peace can mean poverty, disease, corruption, murder, oppression and utter despair. Fuck most versions of alleged peace, pal. Victory, freedom and prosperity beats slowly rotting in totalitarian and dysfunctional shit every time, and that’s whatever it may take to destroy one’s tormentors.

Empty slogans via naïve boob and Left infested movements like Peace Day, usually have the stink of radical front groups and out of time white dreads and nose ring drum circles. Things that invariably attract incoherent mobs mouthing every affluent griper and paper mache modeller from “I don’t want to work and the government should pay me, the fascists!”, to the as per usual Socialist creeps going down on Hamas supporters.

Real peace means long term to centuries old civil democratic government, capitalist economic systems, freedom and the rule of law. Or that previously totalitarian regimes have been completely destroyed, dismantled and rebuilt as capitalist democracies, like Japan and Germany. Thus stable, advanced, prosperous, contributing to the world and with no serious military reach.

As the great P.J O’Rourke has shown, the Left never tire of measuring a fast moving world with their beyond belief dated theory and paradigms that mean the living death of the illogical. A kind of abstract decore.

"I love what you've done to your lounge. It's so 1970's retro! Hang on...it is the 70's!"

It’s a refusal to see anything as it is, innit? God knows I try. The dry, dead and useless ideas of the Left are like the cobwebbed remains of the wedding banquet in Wuthering Heights, without the party atmosphere. Like that crazy sad old loon, they just can't allow any daylight to penetrate the bankrupt gloom. Yeah, so just stop shooting, huh, Jude? At you?

So they’re all firing off for nothing then. For the careful moral relativist, nothing is worth dying for because no one thing is more valid than another. That’s easy when for some nothing has meaning and consequence. At least not the fantastic one they imagine.

“Law, ambassador for the Peace One Day project set up in 1999 by British filmmaker Jeremy Gilley, was in the war-wracked country to promote its aims and show a film about events that marked the campaign in 2007”.

Colonel Neville: Yes, must show a film. That’s maybe why they were fighting? A lack of inner-urban Left flavoured film festivals that the local survivors of Taliban atrocity could discuss later at a hip café. Maybe dig some ironic retro sounds and smoke a joint.

"What we hope to do... is to remind all parties that it is happening and see then what happens through negotiations," Law told a press conference in Kabul.

Colonel Neville: Yeah, “parties”. How interestingly equivalent. Mustn’t mention Islam just because Islam is the singular cause of virtually all Afghani ills.

So they’re just parties, and not necessarily good or bad as such? I bet that if one has to be bad, it’s the coalition forces that get that label, right? The fatuousness of it all reminds me of an excellent piece by Mark Steyn, of course. Mark was writing about George Clooney, the handsome and affable Left Liberal clod. Someone asked George if he had a wish, what would he wish for? George answered along the puerile lines of ‘I wish for one day people would just stop shooting at each other!

Close enough to Miss Worlds “I want world peace!” joke. Steyn made the point that what struck him, was the child-like thinking that people are just shooting at each other, and that there are no reasons or anything complicated or serious as to why. They’re just shooting, cos they’re bad. There is no real value to such meaningless and airbrushed posturing.

"Negotiate" what exactly? How stupid can a celebrity be? Enough to get steady work. What the Taliban want is total control over life and death and thus the power to take their murderously insane beliefs to the 9th degree.

“Talks with elders leading up to Peace Day 2007 allowed health workers to vaccinate 1.4 million Afghan children against polio in areas that had been off-limits as they were under Taliban influence, the United Nations said”.

Colonel Neville: Oh really? Under Taliban er, “influence?” You mean the massive violence of torture, such as skinning, disemboweling and burning children, women and men alive, bombing, beheadings and burning down schools, hospitals and police stations etc? That kind of influence?

Er, gee, those talks were amazing. No mention then of the reality of the required force, courageous professionalism and sacrifice of coalition troops and local military to make anything possible, effective and sustainable in the first place? No, it was just talk. Buffalo bagels.

“Describing the world as being in a "disastrous state," Law said the Peace Day project aimed to encourage all sides - "whether they are fighting for change, killing for change" to "pause."

Colonel Neville: Who is who, Jude doesn’t elaborate, but I can probably make a guess at the obfuscation of it. “Encourage all sides?” So there you have it. The great men and women of the allied forces and the immensely brave locals are the same as the hideous Taliban. And Jesus! "Pause?" Ya kidding me right? You really think the Taliban listen to movie stars? You think Islamists have no goals of their own that they take entirely seriously? Even when it's staring you right in the God damn face? Sheesh!

“They say the women treat you fine on Broadway.
But looking at them just gives me the blues.
'Cause how ya gonna make some time,
When all you got is one thin dime?
And one thin dime won't even shine your shoes”.
On Broadway. George Benson does the Drifters.

Every second affluent and clueless teenager or witless paranoid senior citizen sucking passively on the addictive junk and distraction of the MSM, thinks the world is in a “disastrous state”. Balls. This despite the Himalaya of evidence to the contrary, including being an affluent teen boob and faux maverick in the first place, and still being alive at 80 years old and usually cared for. It is it seems, a required delusion for teen cardboard rebellion and a kind of lifestyle for the pre and post-senile.

On virtually every count the world has improved immensely. From health, medicine, dentistry, plumbing, technology, scientific understanding, refrigeration, child welfar, transport, human rights, communication, food production, life expectancy and so on and so on and so on. The only places that haven’t, lack either civil governance and or capitalism, chum.

"And if that pause is simply to allow, as we did in last year's call for action here, vaccinating children or bringing in food... then let's use that," he said”.

Colonel Neville: Well, that's great of course, but perhaps a rather dubious kudo. Celebrities, especially of the Hollywood and musician kind, can have no embarrassment and shame in appropriating or claiming the achievements of others as their own masterstroke, so it seems. Use is the operative word. Maybe he did help inspire such efforts, but somehow I doubt the context.

“Law and Gilley, who were in Afghanistan in July last year, were due to meet with the NATO-led military force that is helping Afghanistan fight a brutal Taliban insurgency marked by regular suicide attacks”.

Colonel Neville: Why? It’s Jude Law and his pal, not General MacArthur and Patton. Field Mouse Marshall Law: “The way I see it General, you’re not using your air support in this region to your advantage. I’d just like to draw your attention to a manoeuvre and dictum of Rommel’s. I think here, you’ll see that if we move the 101st Airborne to North Poop and then form a pincer movement here. If you can recall that scene in Alfie where I came up from behind and then...”


“Peace Day was established on September 21 in a resolution adopted by the United Nations in 2001 after lobbying from Gilley's project and is intended to be a day of "global ceasefire and non-violence."

Colonel Neville: Yeah, I can dig it. The usual Left and Muslim inspired venal fraud for framing and attacking Israel, America and any Western power that still has the spine, resolve, brains and will left to fight Islamic and totalitarian Communist regimes at all. Check.

“This year events are planned across the globe, ranging from football games and concerts to screenings of Gilley's new documentary "The Day After Peace."

Colonel Neville: Why do I find that title such a perfectly laughable cover for a myriad of sins? Because it's not only pompous, facile and a likely a phony joke, but a standard trick of Left Liberal and Marxist ideology. Gee, ya reckon they're big fans of capitalism or neo-Socialist control freakery?

Peace is not the absence of war. Peace is not a solid object or an event, but a series of objective conditions. I bet the advocates of this particular brand of peace, don’t really mean peace for the West and Israel from Islamic terror per se.

Nor do they likely mean economic freedom via free market capitalism for the masses of oppressed people who live not by mere coincidence in Islamic states, Communist regimes, cannibal gangster fiefdoms, and various totalitarian shitholes etc. Nope.

Making an actual judgement of real despotism and the true face or goals of global Islam is usually beyond the platitude riddled and mechanical mind of many a Left Liberal. No, better to leave the definitions of Islamic and other fascist freaks kind of comfortably vague. Funny, the same folks are usually clear on how evil and wrong the West or Israel is. I sense a pattern, don’t you? Left ideology and Islam are nothing but a series of repeated patterns themselves, just reducto ad absurdum.

"We are appalled at the situation in Afghanistan and beyond," Gilley told reporters. "Nobody wants people to suffer in the way that they are. That is precisely why we came back."

Colonel Neville: Exactly. That way you at least ain’t making any films. "Nobody wants people to suffer in the way that they are?” Er, I believe you are mistaken, either because you’re as dull witted as a box of old wigs, or just wilfully deluding yourself and others. Some people, in fact millions, entirely do want many other people to indeed suffer. The murderers, torturers, rapists, school bombers and child killers of the Taliban get simply rapturous, as they commit their relentless and beyond belief crimes.

What is it that celebrities think they have to offer that’s so apparently unique, that only they must step in for a shining moment and then humbly return to a party in Bel Air?

Maybe they’re sincere here and have done some good? Maybe, but not really sincere enough to drop their ideology whatever the cost, and not serious enough to really look into the monster of Islam to learn and speak the harsh truth of it, whatever that cost. You know, like maybe career and security wise. I don’t get it, but then it may be that the answer is so awfully obvious.

“They say that I won't last too long on Broadway.
I'll catch a Greyhound bus for home, they all say.
But they're dead wrong, I know they are,
'Cause I can play this here guitar,
And I won't quit till I'm a star on Broadway”.
On Broadway. George Benson does the Drifters.

Griffith and Melbourne Universities announce their wonderful Hamas Studies.

Just follow the signs to a politically correct Islamic indoctrination! Pictured are contemporary "Muslim values" in Saudi Arabia where Muslim control is at 100%. Hamas Studies? What are the electives? Well. there’s Urban Improvised Explosive Devices or Money Laundering for Jihad 101. Maybe Infiltration, Deception and Flight Training is more up your skyscraper? Or maybe just do journalism, then write for the Age newspaper, work at the ABC or SBS and thus, cut out the middle man.




Dear sports, as per usual all over the still free West, our Leftist sodden Universities just suck up Islamic propaganda by the drain full. Here’s a regular chuckle fest, [article via Michael Burd] on how your tax dollars go toward spreading the insane word of Mohammad and the er, religion, that always brings a smile to any face, especially at a beach party, Islam.


"Melbourne University Griffith University. NCEIS. National Centre for Excellence in Islamic Studies. Issue 1. August 2008. Researching Islam and Politics.

By Associate Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh Deputy Director, NCEIS.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “What makes Muslims tick?”

Colonel Neville: Damned if I know. The timer on explosive belts? Wait, they use mobiles or self detonation triggers and so on. Um, the hyper irrational? A well founded fear of other Muslims? Logical Fallacy? Cognitive dissonance? Blame shifting? The heat? Emotions? Conspiracy theory? Anti-Semitism? A deep sense of inferiority? Profound ignorance? Lies? Self-delusion? Revenge? Mediocrity? Petro dollars? Wahhabism? Insane dreams of a global Caliphate? Macramé?

Professor Shazzam: “Especially in societies, such as Australia, where Muslims constitute a small minority”.

Colonel Neville: Then why are they such a problem, unlike say Scots, Japanese and Hawaiins? Especially after they reach 10% or over…

Professor Shizzle: “To ask this question is to assume there
is something inherent about Muslims that makes them different, something that is true of Muslims but not of the rest of society”.

Colonel Neville: No, we must never notice any differences. We must never use any discriminating thought process, the basis of rational thinking. That would expose Islam, wouldn’t it? There’s your answer. We ask this of almost no other culture but Muslims, exactly because they are different. Islam is different. You are apparently different.

Professor Swizzlestick: “This is a highly problematic assumption”.

Colonel Neville: Gee, well, um, Islam is by definition, problematic. Thus Muslims protesteth too much methinks. Er, this and much more are not mere assumptions, but on every count, empirical observable facts.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “This kind of assumed Muslim peculiarity has been at the root of the debate on Australian values and multiculturalism”.

Colonel Neville: No, Islamic terror and the general Muslim mentality is at the er, "root" of the feeble and censored er, "debate" in the naive dreamland of Oz. Gee, “Muslim peculiarity”. Why do I only hear peculiar Muslims complaining about being thought of as peculiar? Maybe stop worrying about your image and change your behaviour? Hey Presto! I bet your image would then miraculously change...how about it?

Professor Sham: “The assertion that Iraqi refugees would sacrifice their children overboard to force their way into this lucky country has been truly discredited now”.

Colonel Neville: Ah, a classic canard. No it hasn’t been discredited cos it ain’t what happened really. First of all, haven’t thousands of refugees of every nationality and religion settled in Australia with full rights of citizenship? Name a Muslim country that does the same. There are exactly zero.

There was no Master plan by John Howard to commit any malicious act, no matter how much millions of Muslims and Leftards love conspiracy and need them apparently like oxygen. As far as I can feebly recall, John Howard merely went on the Navy’s intelligence and then clumsily commented in his cardboard way, that if anyone had done such a thing, it would be naturally largely alien to our culture, and it would. And um, I seem to recall than many, many Muslims train their children from two years old to er, “sacrifice” themselves for Islam with a belly full of plastic explosive.

And what were the refugees fleeing from? From other Muslims and not coalition troops, which is a common inference, or they would not head for the West really, would they? But then much of our media are excellent enablers of every Left activist and Islamist.

Professor Shapeshifter: “But the children overboard claim was used effectively by the Coalition Government to drive a divisive and ultimately damaging message: Australian values are unique and Muslims present a challenge to them”.

Colonel Neville: This is an interesting run of shite. See how Islamist and Leftard radical views are fundamentally symmetrical? Id’ say your message is “divisive and ultimately damaging” making the massive slur that a great civil servant and moral man as Howard was up to amazingly evil plans, curiously identical to what anti-Semites say about the Jews, eh?

So it’s damaging and divisive to say Australian values are unique or that we have any at all? So Muslims don’t? Then why learn about the non-existent differences then? Why be a Muslim? Because Bub, Islam is different in every way that counts and then some. Well, obviously Muslims do present a challenge to our values or we wouldn’t be here talking about it. Oh I forgot, we don’t have any values. What a clever way to create a cultural vacuum. Deny the local culture, undermine it and then fill the nullity with gee, I don’t know…Islam? Just like in Eurabia and Londonistan!

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “So what constitutes Islamic values? Muslims are just like any other people. This should not come as a surprise to anyone with a bit of common sense”.

Colonel Neville: Er, no they ain’t. No other fifth of the worlds population follow a doctrine of perpetual warfare via Jihad, founded by a 7th century paedophile rapist and mass murdering madman Jew hater. What are Muslim values? You tell me, because we so seldom see the positive results, if ever. Personal and individual values and choices have zero to do with Islam which sees individuality and democratic choice as blasphemy.

Mohammad and Allah have laid out everything including all the possible “choices” and for all time. There is no room or place for debate in Islam. You can disagree sure, but then they kill you. Muslims are often and mostly not like other people at all. When they have the appearance of normality, they can drop it all in an instant for the operation of Jihad. This can include murdering their neighbours and taking their own babies on a mission as a cover. Sorry, but I don’t know anyone like this. Maybe you do.

What are Muslim values? Nothing overrides the Muslim Ummah, or Muslim masses. And interesting is it not, that anyone who objects or disagrees with Muslim views is a fool and wrong? No criticism or question is ever the right kind.

Or maybe like this one. A tangle of mouse plague proportions. Lucky there’s the er, “justice” of Sharia to add to the maddening crowd. Islamic law apparently limits a man to four wives, as you do. How ah, perversely sensualist. At least there’s no death involved. Oh wait, there is. Damn, man, and eveything was going so well...

“An 84-year-old Nigerian man with 86 wives and 170 children has accepted a decree issued by Islamic authorities that he must divorce 82 of them.

The BBC, quoting a local emir, reported that Mohammadu Bello Abubakar agreed to the mass divorce at the weekend. Abubakar, a former teacher and preacher, faced the death penalty under Sharia law, which was reintroduced to the Muslim-majority Niger state in northwest Nigeria in 2000”.

Professor Shahahaha: “Muslims send their kids to school with hopes for a better future, they look to better their employment prospects and social status. They look after their families and try to keep their faith and traditions alive. That some attend mosque to achieve this is of no consequence”.

Colonel Neville: I’m sure many do. I know some regualr Joes myself, as far as one can tell.

Sadly, many Muslims ironically storm schools, bomb schools and cafes, shops, pet markets, places of employment and value the nihilistic status of martyrdom. In fact, millions and millions do. What does “keeping traditions alive” mean? Is that always ipso facto a good thang?

Is it not so that true Islam accepts no equality of any other faith? It cannot. This would be a blasphemy against the word of Mohammad, wouldn't it? I’d say that whether Muslims go to the Mosque is entirely of consequence when you research what goes on there. Try Finsbury Park Mosque or Lakemba or a hundred others in France, Scandinavia, America, Britain and Asia etc. It’s more than just a Mosque, innit?

Professor Shagpile Abracadabra: “A current study has found that socio-economic objectives related to education and employment are the top issues of concern for Muslims, regardless of the levels of religious devotion”.

Colonel Neville: "Socio-economic is so pre-Noodlestein. Er, so even the most rabid fanatic and head slicer cares about his University course and living in a nice suburb above Islamic duty? Riiight. Give me a fucking break.

Professor Sha Na Na: “It is this mix of perceptions, assumptions and questions which has been an area of research for me in the past few years.

Colonel Neville: Yeah, every criticism based on actual experience of Islam and Muslims and any fact whatsoever, is always just a nasty misunderstanding of perception naturally on our part, whenever it involves the relentless global violence and deception of Muslims. Nothing it seems, is ever the fault of a Muslim. Always the blameless and innocent victims of misunderstanding and bigotry by the nasty free West and those awful immensely successful Jews…

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “In addition to researching Islam in Australia, I have a keen interest in the political manifestations of Islam”.

Colonel Neville: Your research is either laughably superficial, incompetent or an utter fraud of standard Islamist propaganda then, Prof. "A keen interest?" I'm sure you do.

Professor Shovelin' Akartload: “I feel that the debate on the challenge of Islamic radicalisation, which is often covered in the media, misconstrues the situation and tends to collapse the international and national categories into a homogenous whole”.

Colonel Neville: Yes,the “situation” is always ah, “misconstrued” innit? Especially the beheading videos. Happens to no other group on such a massive scale though, eh? It kind of is a homogenous whole: the black hole of Islamism. Of course there’s the natural infighting of the last 1300 years...

Professor Sharkbite Avabanana: “There is no denying that in some parts of the Middle East, there is a difficult relationship between Islamic political groups and ruling regimes”.

Colonel Neville: Yes, difficult... Riiight. Meaning they all want to be head totalitarian bastard freaks.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “Various political groups have often used Islam to gain legitimacy for their claim to power”.

Colonel Neville: Yes, “used” Islam. Check. Islam is the political group. Nice diversionary tactic though and attempt to separate nice old Islam from alleged naughty and nameless political er, “groups”.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “In return, most governments have utilised Islamic symbols and frequent references to Islam to counter claims to their Islamic credentials. Given that both camps operate in Muslim-majority states, this is understandable.

Colonel Neville: Yes, “used Islamic symbols”. Amazing really. Check. “Both camps?” Nice bullshit. Where is this alleged duality? There is none.

Professor Shureham Azbadforya: “But this does have a far-reaching ratcheting-up effect with Islam increasingly entrenched in the political culture of Muslim majority states”.

Colonel Neville: Yeah, since about the 7th century, Fluffy.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “Ironically, a good number of Muslim migrants to Australia, have chosen to leave their home countries in part due to the above experience”.

Colonel Neville: And then often to establish their own version of it here, where this time, they have the same power.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “ My work on Islam and politics has taken me to Central Asia, where the newly independent states of Uzbekistan and Tajikistan have tried to grapple with the challenges of sovereignty. The ruling regimes have quickly settled for a form of neo-Soviet authoritarianism, which is endorsed by the United States,”

Colonel Neville: Really? Er, no. Soviet yes, US support for Sovietism, no. Tragic support for reform, yes. It may have something to do with the Islamic Movement of Uzbekistan.

Seems the old ragheads want to replace said Soviet shit pile totalitarianism with an Islamic shit pile. And it may have something to do with the growing threats of Russia and China and gee, Iran etc? Could be.

Professor Shaboom Askyafather: “...perhaps ironically, as it has helped coalition building in the ‘war on terror”.

Colonel Neville: Yes, “ironic”. It is to laugh. There’s no terror threat then? It’s all in our heads, even when decapitated.

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “This point brings me to another area of interest, ie. the implications of US policy toward the Middle East. In a major joint project, I am involved in the examination of how the articulated US policy on democracy is actually driving the Middle-East further away from the core values of popular will, public accountability and transparent governance”.

Colonel Neville: I think you need and “examination”. Call a Doctor now! Er, where do the er, “core values of popular will, public accountability and transparent governance” exist in the Middle-East or any Muslim state? Virtually nowhere. Zilch, nada and zero.

Cheap shot, but adding “articulated” before “US policy” is superfluous, and rather indicative of bad writing and cover up by those who have nothing authentic to say. Read Orwell. I think you’re in it.

Professor Shampoo Aboobie: “Indeed, the constant erosion of public trust in the proclaimed notion of democracy,”

Colonel Neville: Ah, “proclaimed notion”, eh? You ain’t really interested in democracy except as a convenient ploy then? You don't believe in it...so what have you got worth a damn then, pal?

Professor Shahram Akbarzadeh: “...when Washington says one thing about the importance of elections and does another when US-unfriendly parties win them, should be an area of concern for any observer of the Middle East”.

Colonel Neville: Hey, I just remembered a core Muslim value! Saying one thing and doing another is a fundamental Koranic belief. Any deception or taqiyaa is permissible for Islam. Er, “when US-unfriendly parties win...” Meaning Hamas, right? Now we’re getting somewhere. So you’re just another dirty Hamas lover? Congratulations then, matey! You’re now a runner up in our Islamist bore and Jew hater of the week, for next week!

Keep the pure Islamist gold coming, champ! I know you can do it. I believe in you. No, really. Now would I taqiyaa to you?

Islamist bore and Jew hater of the week.

Recent critical reaction to the truly draining writing of Islamist phony and boob, Sonja Karkar.



Well, the entries are in, Jim. And man, the competition for Islamist creep is fierce. Even though there are bigger and better Islamic spastics, sadly, there can only be one loser er, winner. This week the honour goes to Sonja ‘down Fido’ Karkar. [Sonja Karkar is the founder and president of Women for Palestine in Melbourne, Australia. editor@australiansforpalestine.com]

Karkar! Too much, baby, I mean and I kid you not, this is her name. Karkar by name, poo poo face by nature. I must tell Roger Assbiter and Suzy Creamcheese about it. Jesus Christ. Where do such intellectual toilet dwellers roll from and how do they remain so unchallenged? Here's the Jewish Virtual Library on the myths about Israel.

Anyway, for Red Sonja, anything the Jewish people say, do or are, is apparently damning evidence of Jewish trickery and grist for her seemingly rabid Protocols of Zion diseased mind. What a circus geek. Hey, and she apparently cares about the Australian Koori people. Surprisingly, I feel this is somehow maybe bollocks.

The pro-Islamist is defined by partisan fakery and posturing. Any cipher will do. Thus Israel organising soccer play offs is part of the conspiracy I guess. Er, gee Sonja, the Jews have achieved and continue to achieve and contribute to the world way beyond their numbers in everything from entertainment to science, to literature, technology and law etc. Conversely, a large part of the Muslim world continues to disappear evermore into a self-made vortex of stupidity, violence, failure and blame shifting.

Sonja reckons with the breathtaking hyperbole of classic Muslim denial and delusion, that it’s the Jews who are mean by stubbornly surviving and not the 23 theocratic, military basket case monkey house combinations that have tried to destroy Israel for well, ever. Arab armies are almost uniquely stupid, while Israeli's not of the suicidal and treasonous Left, are almost uniquely intelligent.

The Nobel Prize winners score so far: There are 14 million Jews and they have 159. There are 1.2 billion Muslims, and they have 7. Here’s Sonja in full taqiyaa mode:

”To counter this, Israel has established an Australian chapter of the Peres Centre for Peace which is endeavouring to cast Israel in the role of peacemaker, a role it has been unwilling to honour at the negotiating table. It is part of Israel's new public relations strategy to secure its legitimacy in the global community. Rather than the usual rounds of dialogue and conflict resolution, it is being done on a populist level through sporting activities and culture, and in Australia, where sport dominates so much of our cultural life and social inter-action; it is a powerful vehicle for projecting an intended image”.

Colonel Neville: Er, banana peels. The Jews don’t have to project through any image. They do it through massive positive and outstanding achievements. You can send me a list of Middle-Eastern Muslim achievements and contributions to the world maybe on the back of a postage stamp. Bombing, beheading, lies, big talk, easy oil parasitism, exporting terror and figs and oppressing your own people don’t really count.

And er, Muslims are attacking the Jews. Won't leave them alone, being a constant source of reflection on the comparative inferiority of Muslim culture. If the Israeli's seriously attacked, I mean seriously, they could flatten much of the surrounding Mid-East in a few days. Think of the Seven Day War etc. The title alone says it all, Furry.

Millions of Islamists or Muslims, take your pick, would destroy Israel and murder all Jews if they could, but naturally they can't, being so often profoundly, sorrowfully and laughably backward. After fulfilling their seeming only dream of being the Nazis many always have been, then Muslims would continue on opppressing and killing each other, as they always have. But please, do drool on.

Sonyuk: “The Centre, named after one of the more notorious Zionist architects of Palestinian ethnic cleansing, Shimon Peres,”

Colonel Neville: Ah, ethnic cleansing. Riiight. How many Jews and Christians or any other non-Muslim group across the Arabian Peninsula? None. All murdered. How many Muslims includingPalestinians and other non-Jews live in Israel enjoying full citizenship? About 150,000 and counting.

“...has already persuaded the Australian Football League (AFL) to include a friendly team of Israelis and Palestinians in their 18-team line up for this year's AFL International Cup. It has bedazzled the AFL administrators with the idea of people crossing all boundaries "for the simple love of the game" -- a notion that would never be entertained by a government at war with an enemy state and one that has been rejected when political pressure through sports' boycotts is deemed necessary to stop countries behaving oppressively. Nowhere else was this so effective than in South Africa's anti-apartheid struggle".

Sonja Karkar is the founder and president of Women for Palestine in Melbourne, Australia. Australians for Palestine".

Colonel Neville: Dig how pro-Islamists tick all the politically correct boxes, just like any Leftard activist and Bin Laden? Here’s Miss Wonderful again. Get a bucket, folks.


"Sonja Karkar, The Electronic Intifada, 7 March 2008.[1948.com.au.]

"Australian government continues its love affair with Israel.

So much for the new Australian government taking an even-handed position on Israel-Palestine. Before our politicians even warmed their seats in the new parliamentary sittings, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd announced that he will lead a parliamentary motion to honour Israel on 12 March acknowledging Yom Ha'atzmaut, Israel's Independence Day. The opposition leader will second the motion. Then, celebrations will take place at a reception in the Mural Hall of Parliament House".

Colonel Neville: Well, one can honour actual achievement like medicine, neuroscience, physics, computing, communication, rule of law, human rights and just surviving a bloated stone fish headed embezzler gangster hijacker and closet homosexual like Arafat. It’s so hard to honour easy oil money squandered on Western prostitutes, gold limos and terror, but many on the Left try.

Karkar: “If Palestinians and their supporters had any hopes of a sympathetic hearing from the new Rudd government on the multiple human rights abuses being perpetrated by Israel in the Occupied Palestinian Territories, those hopes are now dashed.

This year marks 60 years of Palestinian dispossession and displacement and a savage, relentless occupation that is smothering the lifeblood of the Palestinians while Israel celebrates its ill-gotten gains”.

Colonel Neville: I thought Arafat did that for forty years. Where did the millions go? Not a dollar spent on a school or hospital. Thus even Muslim terrorists get equal medical treatment in Israel, while captured Jews are murdered and literally torn into bloody pieces of flesh and paraded around the streets being licked by Palestinians, the world’s most imaginary people. Er, name me one Arab country that has allowed a single Palestinian refugee to become a citizen and access services? There are none I believe.

Son of Karkar: “Palestinians are starving in Gaza, Palestinians are being sold out in the West Bank, and Palestinians are dying. Their very existence is under threat. It is as simple and as awful as that”.

Colonel Neville: Er, when every Palestinian child from two years old is taught to want to murder Jews and commit suicide in a homicide bombing, whose selling out the lives of these children exactly?

Karkooky: “Every Australian ought to be asking why our prime minister and the parliament feel so humiliatingly obligated to Israel that they must go to these lengths to show their friendship with a foreign country that consistently violates international law, United Nations resolutions and human rights conventions”.

Colonel Neville: Er, because Israel is a successful modern and free democracy, and the only one in the intellectual, moral and humour free moonscape of dysfunction that is Sandland. And gee, recognise the corruption of the UN with its biggest block of 52 Islamic freak states who help pass a majority of resolutions that invariably condemn Israel and never true shit piles like Zimbabwe, Iran, Cuba, Sudan, Congo or North Korea etc? The UN sucks shit, like you Sonja.

Poo Poo again: “If supporting the Palestinian cause is too much to ask, then refusing to single Israel out for any kind of positive recognition would at least be sensitive to the Palestinians living here and their stateless nation's painful history. It is on a human wreckage of Palestinian lives that Israel celebrates its independence, honoured so gratuitously by the Australian government”.

Colonel Neville: Supporting the murder of any and every Jew you mean? And years of rocket launches? What exactly? Regards media recognition, we both know that's a mighty load of bullshit, don't we? Our MSM reeks with pro-Palestinian, pro-Hamas, pro-Islamist creeps and various other Central Casting Jew haters and Israel loathers, like our Sonja. Israel is singled out exclusively 24 hours of everyday for well, attacks of bog standard anti-Semitism, again like yours Sonja.

Are you thicker than cheese whiz?

Sonny: “Such demonstrations of affection are not new. Former Prime Minister John Howard had already fostered this extraordinary bond when he declared Australia as Israel's closest friend. Many of his ministers followed suit and none was more accommodating than former Foreign Minister Alexander Downer when he said that he wore Israel as "a badge of honour" even as Israel's war planes decimated the Lebanese landscape in 2006.

True to form, Israel has rewarded its friends with facile honours”.

Colonel Neville: Facile? You’d know. Sonja has all the substance of a furball. Why do so many Muslims so lack not only any sense of honour, but of any style, and are so devoid of any trace of humour or indeed, self-reflection?

Sonjah: “John Howard received two in one year. He was awarded the Jerusalem Prize from the World Zionist Organization and he had a forest named after him in the Negev by the Jewish National Fund, which specializes in acquiring property for "the purpose of settling Jews on such lands." These lands are the subject of legal proceedings brought by the now displaced indigenous Bedouins of the Negev who are being "moved out" for the exclusive benefit of Jews worldwide who want to live in Israel. Although these Bedouins live in what is now called Israel, 45 of their villages are not recognized by the state and have never received even the most basic amenities”.

Colonel Neville: Any reason that all Arabs haven’t shared around their massive oil revenues? Israel has no oil. It’s only assets are brains and co-operation. Egypt receives more aid than Israel and look at Cairo. And Egypt is one vast urinal with the most outstanding architecture built several thousand yeas ago. And why can’t a single Jew live safely outside of Israel in any Muslim country when many nationalities live in Israel? Well, because many Muslims want to murd