tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415265324366462368.post8852440783640685412..comments2024-01-04T22:01:17.430+11:00Comments on Colonel Neville Always Dresses For Dinner. : Colonel Neville exposed as a flawed human being by Mark "I Was the Son of a Communist!" Davis.Colonel Robert Nevillehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03846514965728659622noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415265324366462368.post-53320629312057424982008-12-28T11:18:00.000+11:002008-12-28T11:18:00.000+11:00YOU WROTE (On Right Truth): "With all Mark's prote...YOU WROTE (On Right Truth): "With all Mark's protesteth of Frank's er, "innocence", Mark curiously writes and has a blog on um, the offical Obama site...No, really."<BR/><BR/>RESPONSE: I'm not sure why you would find my blog on Obama's website to be "curious." Obama has always been the primary target of the disinformation campaign. Defaming my father was only collateral damage. If it were not for Obama, they would have had no reason to attack my father.<BR/><BR/>I would have thought that you could recognize, Colonel, that it makes perfect military sense to colocate defensive fortifications.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415265324366462368.post-13626852323750562592008-12-27T13:43:00.000+11:002008-12-27T13:43:00.000+11:00Col. You have more time than I do. Just saw your...Col. You have more time than I do. Just saw your comments at Right Truth, for some reason they went to spam. They are posted now.<BR/><BR/>I think Mr. Davis Jr. had been leaving comments on several sites who posted on his father, Frank. I suppose we can't blame a son for speaking out in favor of his father.<BR/><BR/>Debbie Hamilton<BR/><A HREF="http://www.righttruth.typepad.com" REL="nofollow">Right Truth</A>Right Truthhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18274108313586611205noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415265324366462368.post-10353076299288100442008-12-21T23:03:00.000+11:002008-12-21T23:03:00.000+11:00Gosh! I would have thought a Colonel would have a...Gosh! I would have thought a Colonel would have at least taken the time to learn about 1930s misinformation and disinformation, especially if he intended to insult people due to their ignorance.<BR/><BR/>Military historians know, good sir, that layman knowledge about the atrocities of Europe was very limited before WWII. Neither Stalin's nor Hitler's crimes were common knowledge. To be fair, you must use a "reasonable man" standard of culpability.<BR/><BR/>Once again, since it didn't register at all during the first presentation: During that period misinformation and disinformation were rampant. German disinformation disseminated the hoax "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" as they were killing. Russian disinformation disseminated "Potemkin Villages" of a happy workers paradise as THEY were killing. An American "reasonable man" did not know of the European atrocities, nor were they aware of the coercive3 nature of those regimes.<BR/><BR/>It is unfair to judge with hindsight. You must judge historical events of contemporaneous standards, because such standards reflect common knowledge. For example, neither the effects of tobacco, nor the truth of European atrocities, were not very clear in the 1930s. The atrocities were obvious only with hindsight.<BR/><BR/>Would you judge Jefferson and Lincoln by current standards? Would they be considered "racist" by current standards, even though they may have been more progressive than 90% of their peers?<BR/><BR/><BR/>BTW: If we are going to discuss these issues, may I ask you to conduct yourself in a more professional manner?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415265324366462368.post-22284929816416038552008-12-21T20:49:00.000+11:002008-12-21T20:49:00.000+11:00Dear Mark:Hey, that's a pretty substantial reply. ...Dear Mark:<BR/><BR/>Hey, that's a pretty substantial reply. Pretty neat.<BR/><BR/>Mmmmm. "Flaws" eh? Um, personal flaws like being boring, a lack of empathy, dishonesty or picking your nose are not really equivalent to joining the Communist Party. <BR/><BR/>A totalitarian, absurd, utterly discredited, inhuman ideology based on murder, conformity, lies, spite, envy and madness. Bad grooming, selfishness and pro-collective fascism? See the subtle difference?<BR/><BR/>It's a flaw showing a total lack of discerning judgement and analytical research skill to be sure.<BR/><BR/>And what I am, ain't really the main story at all is it? No one I know is President elect and I mentored no-one. So who cares?<BR/><BR/>Not a "lifetime member" then? Well, on what date did Frank resign from the Communist Party? As I said, AIM missed the mark at a clear target. Frank was a Marxist radical and Obama is a Marxist radical.<BR/><BR/>I don't know why Kinkaid doesn't reply to you. You are good value and you being Frank's son, you do deserve that. No, really.<BR/><BR/>Hey, if Frank "criticised" Stalin, obviously not to his face[!], what EXACTLY did Frank say? If you said he did, you must know what it was...<BR/><BR/>Let me know.<BR/><BR/>Ah, "honourable men" sarcasm. I can dig it. It's a little rough speaking of honour among Marxist geeks and so on though, innit?<BR/><BR/>AIM is not THAT ironic. I mean I ain't rolling in irony. The vast majority of their site is entirely correct. At no point is Frank mistaken for a Rotary Club member or a Quaker.<BR/><BR/>"Rejected by the Obama campaign?" On their record that's a virtual guarantee that the opposite of what they say is true.<BR/><BR/>The fake birth certificate, the terrorist links removed from B.O's site, the denials and lies, then some mild admissions via more lies regards Ayers, Wright, Khalidi, Odinga, Annenberg etc, etc, etc, etc.<BR/><BR/>I'm sorry, but I don't give a flying fuckerooni about anything the Obama spin whore hordes say whatsoever. Except of course, as a pointer to another beyond belief piece of treasonous crime, and as per usual ignored by Barry’s massively bankrupt fraud pals, that apparently make up much of the incompetent MSM.<BR/><BR/>Obama is the old joke of how do you know when he's lying? His lips are moving. Boom tish!<BR/><BR/>The "relationship" with Frank, [so there was one?, [but just er, "poetry" and "music"...yeah, right, check, nuance] was not what got Obama success. He had a good education and was accepted fully and supported by most everyone quite naturally all the way through it. It didn't take BO long to go from middle class to wealthy class as a junior politician and activist lawyer.<BR/><BR/>So the "bi-racial" struggle fantasies don't wash with me, kid. <BR/><BR/>"Vision of an inclusive society" means what exactly? Nothing. It's just a meaningless string of PC Marxist platitudes and clichés.<BR/><BR/>There is no more "inclusive" country in the world than America, thus President elect via the crime and corruption of Chicago machine politics and Illinois etc, of which BO was a chummy well paid and major cog.<BR/><BR/>Davis was not "uniquely qualified" but merely part of a lifelong pattern of radical and criminal associations of Barry Hussein.<BR/><BR/>Sadly, a lot of your next paragraphs sound like faux reasonable mixed with the classic and awful tracts written by Leftard academics sodden with Marxist Critical Theory.<BR/><BR/>"The subject, or the 'unterdurmenschtrangfindleblingen' in the original German, canonises the reversal of the outer and inner paradigms of the post mechanical grieveances of the concord. This metaphysical struggle for the uber prancing of the doodle sneebling, introduces to the hegemony of the Wurlitzer....blah, blah".<BR/><BR/>Er, Jim Crow was a thang endorsed by the old Democratic Party...<BR/><BR/>Yeah, ya right, saying America is "implicitly racist" as you do, IS er, rather racist and bigoted. Yeah, that 7 year old Jewish girl in Milwaukee and that Chinese guy in Maine are all sooo racist. Balls. Where are these non racist countries or less "racist" than America? There are none. Only America has a genuine ability to self correct, change and truly progress in ideas.<BR/><BR/>What is the beef with the US from invariably inferior states anyway?<BR/><BR/>Kudos to you and Frank for a lot of the positives such as pro free market, er, anti-Communist ideology, anti-black liberation drivel and so on.<BR/><BR/>I imagine he probably was a "mellowed" guy when he finally met Barry. Acapulco Gold and retirement will do that to ya every time!<BR/><BR/>"Push me to the duck pond, will ya Barry?"<BR/><BR/>Er, Ron Paul is an incompetent intellect and an absurdly incoherent wacko boob. He makes little consistent sense, really.<BR/><BR/>"Further, the barbarity of communist regimes discredited the CPUSA and Marxist ideology. Newly divorced, he entered his golden years with glee".<BR/><BR/>Yep, 100 million murdered and counting spoils everything....With "glee" eh? Maybe he should have started a club?<BR/><BR/>"Davis deeply loved the United States, despite his occasional flirtation with radical ideology. He recognized, perhaps belatedly, that the United States offers a unique combination of economic opportunity and personal freedom, thus providing sufficient strength and moral authority to champion human rights worldwide".<BR/><BR/>Great. And yet he never joined the Heritage Foundation, a business body the Republicans or wrote a book speaking about these very things?<BR/><BR/>"If he HAD been so lucky, Barack Obama could not have found a finer mentor anywhere".<BR/><BR/>Really? Frank was the best choice to train a President to be then? Ya don't say?<BR/><BR/>I guess that depends entirely on what Obama wanted to be mentored in.<BR/><BR/>Colonel Neville.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7415265324366462368.post-74036219069060344832008-12-21T08:08:00.000+11:002008-12-21T08:08:00.000+11:00Everyone has flaws, my friend, including you, me, ...Everyone has flaws, my friend, including you, me, my father, and Cliff Kincaid. That is part of the human condition.<BR/><BR/>Cliff Kincaid and his colleagues have accused Frank Marshall Davis (1905-1987) of being a Stalinist, a lifetime member of the Communist Party, and “Obama’s Communist Mentor.” Kincaid heads “Accuracy In Media” (A.I.M.), an organization dedicated to “fairness, balance and accuracy in news reporting.” Kincaid and his colleagues are all honorable men.<BR/><BR/>Having asked Kincaid to substantiate some of his accusations, and having received no reply, one can only conclude that Kincaid must be preoccupied with more important questions, because Kincaid is an honorable man. <BR/><BR/>Although the ironically named “Accuracy In Media” has yet to substantiate that Davis actually mentored Obama (a claim specifically rejected by the Obama campaign), such a relationship could have provided a bi-racial teenager with the key to success in mainstream America. To minimize criticism and maximize their potential, bi-racial African-Americans must walk a narrow identity path between group expectations. Davis was uniquely qualified to show the way. He may have significantly facilitated Obama’s vision of an inclusive society.<BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/><BR/>Davis may have advised Obama that to succeed in mainstream America, African-Americans must consider worst-case scenarios without wearing a chip on their shoulders, even though this normally requires judgment borne through actual experience. They must learn to give others (such as Cliff Kincaid) the benefit of the doubt. Success within mainstream America requires that abusive behavior should be attributed to bias only when there is no other plausible explanation.<BR/><BR/>Growing up in explicitly racist America, Davis learned never to immediately trust anybody white, but professional and personal familiarity nevertheless produced many warm interracial relationships. While one could plausibly argue that such stereotype activation is inherently racist, the recent expansion of “racist” to include such thought processes (as opposed to differential treatment) renders virtually everyone similarly culpable. <BR/><BR/>Although his experience with Jim Crow may have “incurably” limited his expectations of contemporary America, he shared Dr. King’s dream of a color-blind society. He unequivocally rejected racism, and worked tirelessly in support of equal rights for all Americans. He recognized that although victims of racism may have a reason to hate their oppressors, such reasons do not become rights – a distinction often lost on his critics. Collective responsibility is a double-edged sword.<BR/><BR/>Davis’s crusty radicalism may have perfectly counterbalanced Hawaii’s laid-back lifestyle for an African-American teenager destined for greatness. He provided coherent insight on African-American history, politics, and culture vis-à-vis mainstream America. Davis recognized the folly of cultural nationalism, including Black Separatist movements, long before meeting Obama. Obama’s grandfather may not have recognized the true value of his gift.<BR/><BR/>Although he may have used CPUSA periodicals as a publishing tool in the 1930’s and 1940’s, along with contemporaries Richard Wright and Langston Hughes, he rejected communist ideology in general and specifically attacked Stalin. He supported a fully integrated mixed economy, because neither laissez–faire capitalism nor collectivism provide the greatest benefit for the greatest number. He also had a libertarian streak that may have made Ron Paul proud.<BR/><BR/>Davis retired from activism by the 1970’s. His civil rights agenda had become the law of the land. He wrote little. Even if he had remained prolific, the burgeoning black publishing world obviated CPUSA periodical support for African-American writers. Further, the barbarity of communist regimes discredited the CPUSA and Marxist ideology. Newly divorced, he entered his golden years with glee.<BR/><BR/>As an honorable man, Kincaid must be unaware that by the 1970’s, the twin forces of Hawaiian and hippie cultures had mellowed Davis to the point that “Stalinist” charges are especially absurd. By the early 1970’s, Davis had become a virtual teddy bear, a permanent fixture of the Koa Cottages in the “Waikiki Jungle,” noted for its counterculture residents. Davis was known as a kindly old man, usually sitting on his porch a few steps from Kuhio Avenue, waving at all that passed. Although he had little money, he was always willing to share with those in deeper need.<BR/><BR/>As an honorable man, Cliff Kincaid must also be unaware that his portrayal of a raving Stalinist could not be further from the truth. Davis deeply loved the United States, despite his occasional flirtation with radical ideology. He recognized, perhaps belatedly, that the United States offers a unique combination of economic opportunity and personal freedom, thus providing sufficient strength and moral authority to champion human rights worldwide. If he HAD been so lucky, Barack Obama could not have found a finer mentor anywhere. (IMHO)<BR/><BR/>Regards,<BR/><BR/>MarkKaleokualohahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16503278385015253407noreply@blogger.com