Derek And Clive Tackle a Conundrum.

Clive: "From beginning to end, the Soviet product of political correctness sodden left liberalism is one big 'effing suicidal contradiction, Derek. It's such a very old load of unbelievably back-dated bollocks, that most lefties have to take enormous amounts of bleeding drugs to not only understand any of it which can't be done, but to believe and personally act on even a single shred of it. Thus their greatest wish is to convince every dissenter by force and state controlled conformity via intimidation and violence. Such phony baloney and moral vanity driven fraud can only be swallowed whole, if like a drug addicted whore in a toilet, one disguises the true flavor of morally and rationally going down, with ample helpings of cough syrup. This dear Derek, is the true face of left liberal smiley faced fascism".

Derek: "They're all arseholes!"

Clive: "Exactly, Derek".





Derek [on piano]: “Oh, John Pilger came into the lav to film his latest doc. ‘Ee said I need more bleeding funding, so can I suck your cock!”

Clive: “It’s a funny coincidence that you should mention John Pilchard, the avid fan of all things Marxist and nihilist thus deemed er, “progressive” Derek, because I never think of him. A progressive is someone who develops ever more acceptable versions of the exact same thing by simply changing the name.

The non-religion that is trying to kill us all and invariably is offended or threatens violence at any criticism of their murderous antics, is a religion of er, peace. Conversely the Judeo Christian faith that is the basis of our enormous free flow of ideas, choice and innovation, freedom and prosperity of capitalist democracy, free speech and natural rights [and ironically your homosexual right not to be killed by Islam] is called intolerant. 

Thus as they say at the peoples cube, truth telling is now hate speech and hate speech = sensitivity training. Targeting terrorists = indiscriminate murder of civilians, indiscriminate murder of civilians = resistance to imperialism.Destruction of the family = social progress. Clinical paranoia = outstanding film making. Free country = oppressive regime, oppressive regime = workers' paradise. Electoral process = failing democracy, Socialist dictatorship = will of the people. Export of capitalist democracy = imperialist war for oil, export of communist revolution = true democracy.  

Terrorists = freedom fighters, freedom fighters = imperialist occupiers, rapists and murderers. Rambling communist thug = idealistic romantic dreamer, hard-working productive individual = corporate fascist. Lowering standards = raising awareness, degeneracy = striving urban culture, and so on ad nauseum, Derek”.

Derek: “What if I said comfortable, unchallenged, phony, leftist radical arsehole?”

Clive: “Pilchard!”

Derek: “Oh, George Negus came into the bog to interview Hamas, they had a lot of inane laughs and George Needless kissed some arse!”

Clive: “Very good. You’ve finished. Now don’t call us, and we’ll never call you.

Now I don’t know if you’ve ever noticed the latest conundrum regarding the mentality of the average dhimmie leftard arsehole prick vomit bag, when it comes to the utter joy and light of Islamic terror, Derek?

As you know, I would never be so un-pc as to call a thing exactly what it is. No, circular wanking and denial is the way to go. Anyway Derek, have you had any contact with the people of whom I speak?”

Derek: “You mean your bog-standard apologist and Jew-hating mob loons of the left? All the fucking time, mate! They're always in my fucking bog! Always raving about "I need more government funding! More taxpayer gravy! Where are my bulging checks from the Melbourne Age, Green Left Retarded Socialist and the New York Times? And please cut my fucking head off cos’ I love it! They're 'orrible!”

Clive: “Exactly. There’s a curious contradiction that shows that their entire allegedly tolerant position regards Islam is an irresponsible fraud”.

Derek: “They’re all full of shit, mate!”

Clive: “Positively bursting. Well, this it how it works when you are stupidly determined to tolerate the intolerant vis a vis Islam. Anyone who says they are a Muslim is ipso facto a Muslim and their faith, Islam is untouchable by mirth or critique of any kind by us Infidels and filthy Kafirs, except in the er, positive”.

Derek: “I love the light hearted cheer and the good will to all, the most!”

Clive: “Who doesn’t? And the screaming. Then as if by magic, the same people who we must be ever vigilant never to offend, can be deemed as “not real Muslims” by the same Left pricks who say they will then arrest you for saying something they don't like or on behalf of Muslims everywhere, for something they don’t like, from only a moment before. This is the pure joy of left liberal fascism today, Derek”.

Derek: “Bloody ‘ell! It’s all a little fucking neurotic and complicated innit? What kind of things offend many Muslims around the world then, Clive?”

Clive: “The things that offend many Muslims around the world today Derek, can be narrowed down to everything and nothing”.

Derek: “Lovely. Er, how can a Muslim go instantly from being a Muslim, to not being a "real" Muslim, Clive?”

Clive: “It’s surprisingly easy and there in lies the conundrum of the politically correct loser, as it were. A Muslim just has to act appallingly or kill someone and they are no longer a Muslim. At least until they stop killing and start complaining about people screaming as they're beheaded. And oddly, neither terrifying behavior nor murder is always seen as bad, per se. There are many er, "conditions" that can apply at any time to the religion of peace or else, but not really for anyone else. And they can change back again without any notice whatsoever too. Thus, it is technically impossible for a Muslim to ever set off a bomb, behead or murder someone, because..."

Derek: "They're naturally not real Muslims!"

Clive: " Exactly, Derek. So even if you don't know you're offending Islam by your mere Infidel or Jewish existence, you probably are.

Thus what happens is, that even though someone has been a Muslim all their life, and their entire family is Muslim going back generation after generation, and they go to the Mosque, they live in a Muslim community or state, they read the Koran, they dress and look like Muslims, they speak and eat like a Muslim and they say they are Muslims and may want to spread Islam globally by any means, exactly as Mohammad and the Koran clearly proscribes, no, no. The moment one cuts off a head and sets off a bomb, hey presto! The Western media, academia, governments, church leaders, celebrities and pop stars all decree as one “...but they are not real Muslims!” Amazingly, these people are yet to say this on a street corner in say Tehran, Riyadh or Cairo”.

Derek: “Why not, Clive?”

Clive: “Because many of the local Muslims would be real Muslims only up to a certain point. And I believe that exact point would be where they become not real Muslims as if by magic, and cut the real Infidels heads off”.

Derek: “That's a real puzzler, Clive! So, I guess Taoists, Hindu’s and Christians are not real whenever they do anything naughty then, too?”

Clive: “Oddly no. Taoists, Hindu’s and your cargo cultists, don’t really fit into the current lefts paradigm, so are largely invisible, though Christians do fit nicely. Just remember, when a Christian does something bad, they are always a real Christian, unless they do something good. Then they don’t exist. Yes, it’s a real conundrum, as you say”.

Derek: “Unless the conundrum cuts the heads off Christian school girls in Thailand because they're Christians and not Muslims, Clive?”

Clive: “Nope, such an orgy or relentless violence can be and is simply ignored. Remember they’re not real Muslims who have murdered over 150,000 people in Northern no-go zones of Thailand over the last twenty years”.

Derek: “Who did it then?”

Clive: “Oh, random and anonymous people who shall remain nameless, even though they look, sound, act, walk, talk and appear exactly like Muslims. It could have been Hawaiian Anglicans or animists from Toronto. Nobody knows, Derek, nobody knows. Even though not real Muslim jihadist groups have repeatedly declared it was them and they want to kill all non-believers. This is a mere incredible coincidence spread over decades. According to our elitist betters, its hate speech churned up by Asian journalists reporting the empirical facts. Facts are no excuse for speaking the truth, Derek. So remember, there are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world, but none of them are doing any of the mountains of atrocity you can see everyday”.

Derek: “Who is?”

Clive: “Someone else, Derek, it’s always someone else. And it pays to remember that. Or else”.

Derek [on piano]: “Oh, Steve Bracks came into my room and sat upon me bed. He said I’ve passed a fucking anti-free speech law and now you’ll end up dead, oy!”

Clive: “Bravo! All together now! The natural totalitarian fascism of the left and Islam is always all for our own good! Now once more without the music and lyrics!”




[Here's over 350 five star reviews for Mark Steyn's great empirical paperback opus, America Alone: the end of the world as we know it. A returning best-seller for two years running! I should be so lucky.]

The free capitalist democratic West is the best, just get here and those in charge will surrender the best.

Celebrating multicultural diversity and tolerance presents! Via islaminaction:




You’ve probably seen it before but not in the MSM or with popcorn. I can hardly stand to watch it myself. It is a gut turner and an anger management test. As folks like us know very well, this is just one of the many terrifying videos on overt Islamisation in Britain and elsewhere that now number in the hundreds of thousands. This is not isolated. It’s EVERYWHERE in the West that has Muslim immigration. Why do we need these dangerous criminals again? The rugs?

In this cheery little vid, the mob of Muslim laughter cadets do as they please to spread Islam and the UNARMED British PC Police simply run away...

This is what the British authorities have reduced the once respected British Bobby to. Imagine American hardcore serious Police professionals running like a rabble? It wouldn't get to this...or would it? Oh yeah, the Police do let Muslims parade and threaten to their black hearts content in major US cities like New York etc. I forgot. Here in Australia too.

It's easy to tell when an alleged "protester" is guilty of criminal sedition...It's when they relentlessly call for the destruction of the state. Yes, I believe so.

Note the clueless apparent leftard fellow traveller in the orange vest who seems genuinely surprised that Muslim males are gee, dangerous and violent. This is law enforcement? A disgrace. And it goes on and on and bloody on...Where the hell is the senior leadership? NEVER run in a chaotic mob and with your back to the enemy.

The goal is to close ranks and take those Muslim loons down one by one, but no. Instead let’s show them you’re easy to destroy! That’ll work out. Note the one lone Muslim guy that tries to appease his fellow members of the Islamic Ummah to no avail [for now]. Gee, not much support for mythical “moderate” Muslims by the law on the ground, eh? Nope, you’re on your own, bub.

I tell you this, when Muslim psychopaths spread the joy of Islam across YOUR suburb, the Police WILL NOT COME. They won't be able to. I have witnessed the phenomena of the invisible Police officers. You can wait all night and all of the next day and night. So good night and good luck.

We can either deport these hot for jihad filth to the open sea or an island, or spend money on prosecuting them and either nothing happens, or they get to spread jihad in jail with all equipment supplied by our government! No really...

In a time of war, hang them for sedition and treason. You be the hanging judge. "This is a war" says one Muslim creep among many other delights. And he's right. Our spineless government's are simply too PC to declare it. Muslims don't have the same inhibition's, and thus they have a tactical and strategic advantage in their asymmetrical global jihad war of aggression.

Either way, the West will have to deal decisively with Muslim insurrection eventually. The alternative is our oppression, dishonour and death. And boy, the left and mainstream will help at our own downfall and execution, and theirs too.


Geert.

In-country Muslim convert psychopath.

Fox bends over a little for Saudi geeks while interviewing the great Robert Spencer. The US Muslim prison population is about 6%. 40,000 inmates are convered to Islam a year. [Poor sound quality of vid.]

Requiem for British decency. Melanie Phillips.

The cruelty of the Koran at warp speed.

Koran not lost in translation.

Vid on Koran er, "accuracy."



In Ft. Lauderdale, illiterate and jealous loser Muslim misfits love the child killers of Hamass, and hate the vastly superior, successful and contributing out of all percentage to their numbers, Jews. Gee, what a surprise!




Remember Aqsa Parvez.

John Kerry Hamass mailman.

Hey kids! Think like a homicide suicide bomber.

Confessions of an ex-Jew hater.

The great Geert Wilders makes the scene.




Anti-Jihad meeting.



Obama blows ACORN.

Anne Coulter with another great piece on Reagan, Coolidge and Eisenhower.

Irrational child = Koskid.

Kathy Shaidle.

“A working-class kid has less chance of moving up the ladder than they did 50 years ago now even the few good jobs (by which I mean both well-paid and a skive) which a bright, poor teenager could get into, like showbiz and journalism, are going to dim, posh nobodies, who can blame ordinary kids for grabbing the chance to get rich quick with both hands?”

Police arrest peaceful pro-life teens as you do.

Via blazingcatfur: Great headlines of our time!

York University 'harassment adviser' accused of posting anti-Semitic photo on Facebook: Luckily, it's York University in the UK! Phew. Makes for a bit of a change...

BCF: "What does strike me as curious is that this picture was displayed by someone who, in addition to holding down a non-academic job in the biology department, is also employed by the Equal Opportunities Office to act as a confidential adviser about harassment.

Collingwood says that he "does not personally share the views expressed in the picture" - but he is a stalwart of the York Palestinian Solidarity Campaign, so you can see how the confusion might arise. He's also a member of Green Left, Friends of the Earth, Republic UK and the North Yorkshire Humanist Group. You really wouldn't want to get stuck in a lift with him."



Via jihadwatch org: "February 17, 2009. Former FBI special agent: Every major Muslim organization in the U.S. is controlled by the Muslim Brotherhood

Covenantzone: Wrong kind of talking with Muslims.

Via jihadwatch org: February 17, 2009. Gitmo detainee: "I do pose a threat to the United States and its allies.... I am a Muslim jihadist"

USA Afghan Consulate official beat his wife for fifteen straight hours: Fagirad told police his “wife was a dog and he was going to treat her like a dog,” prosecutors said.

Steve Crowder go team Israel.




Kinda old but still classics. Pat Condell on Geert turned back at Heathrow.




Pat on Islams war on freedom.




Pat on stop Sharia in Britain.



Major British Muslim circus freak on TV.




Andrew Thomas Brit asshat journo hack interviews Geert. Plus Lord Haw Haw Ahmed the super Taquiyaa pushing shit fascist.

For Many You Could Have an Awareness of Anything at All Week.

A cheery shot from a recent Manson Family Affair Marxist scumbag rally for er, peace starring Obama pervert pals Bill 'murder that police officer and/or judge, then get a university tenure for life' Ayers, and Reverend 'twenty years of Marxist product fake Christianity, race baiting, racism, bigotry and hair-brained treason and Obama never noticed' Wright. Ta dah! Making a pipe-bomb for peace you dirty bankrupt frauds. I could happily pack these two bastards in the boot of a 1978 Impala for a midnight picnic in the desert. "He's a rabble and he ain't never gonna be any good..."




I dedicate this post to the courageous, outstanding and noble David Horowitz of discoverthenetworks org and his Terrorism Awareness Centre. Jihad in academia. Now over 150 US campus's have overt Jew hating, free West destroying and blatantly treasonous Jihadist Muslim front groups fully in place, AND FUNDED BY THE UNIVERSITY. No, really. Muslims are murdering millions of Christians and others. Between 2001 and 2002, Indonesian Muslim jihadist mujahadeen murdered over 10,000 Christians for not converting to Islam. See it in The Melbourne Age? How far is Indonesia from Australia? Far enough to lie and pretend.

The Koran is Mein Kampf. Hey, while digging the Horowitz sites, I started transcribing these Islamic gems of love and peace, by gee, leading OFFICIAL Muslim clerics until I found even more wonderful one's on Dave's vids. But dig 'em anyway. Ah, Islam. As Mark Steyn said, millions of Muslim's are world leaders at being murdering losers and virtually nothing else.

"Christians are infidels, enemies of Allah, his messenger and the believers. They deny and curse Allah and his messenger, how can we draw near to those infidels?" Saudi Sheik Marzouq Salem Al-Ghamdi in Mecca.

“Islam belives that only Islam and the ‘Camp of Kufur’ [unbelief] exist, and that ther is no way to reach Paradise...except by walking in the path of our Prophet Moahhad and joining Islam. Any other way leads to Hell...In light of this my believing brethren, how can it be claimed that Judaism, Christianity and Islam are all paths leading to Allah?" Sheik Adnam Ahmad Siyami, May 11 2001 at a mosque in Mecca.

“Muslims must...educate their children to Jihad…and to hatred of the Jews, the Christians, and the infidels.” Saudi Preacher Sheikh Muhammad Saleh Al-Munajjid.

Obama the corrupt not so ex-ACORN lawyer and continuing corrupt yet lying ACORN pal is cool cos' the NYT’s is hip to Obama. They approve if it's Obama Brand GraftTM. More great news on why people actually are getting more dimwitted. Man, do you know how rare it is to meet folks who can either read or construct a coherent sentence, never mind a paragraph or more? Hey, don't look at me.

The Dumbest Generation by Mark Bauerlein: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future (Or, Don't Trust Anyone Under 30)

“If you’re the parent of someone under 20 and read only one non-fiction book this fall, make it this one. Bauerlein’s simple but jarring thesis is that technology and the digital culture it has created are not broadening the horizon of the younger generation; they are narrowing it to a self-absorbed social universe that blocks out virtually everything else.” Don Campbell, USA Today. “An urgent and pragmatic book on the very dark topic of the virtual end of reading among the young.” Harold Bloom.

“Never have American students had it so easy, and never have they achieved less. . . . Mr. Bauerlein delivers this bad news in a surprisingly brisk and engaging fashion, blowing holes in a lot of conventional educational wisdom.” Charles McGrath, The New York Times. “It wouldn’t be going too far to call this book the Why Johnny Can’t Read for the digital age.” Booklist.

“Throughout The Dumbest Generation, there are . . . keen insights into how the new digital world really is changing the way young people engage with information and the obstacles they face in integrating any of it meaningfully. These are insights that educators, parents, and other adults ignore at their peril.” Lee Drutman, Los Angeles Time.

Townhall on why liberals never lie. Cos they say so!

“Nancy Pelosi is a liar, so labeled by her own party, the administration she serves, the party that opposes her, the media of our nation, and now the people who elected her. And there's little else that all those groups ever would agree on. So like most of the rest of the nation perhaps you find yourself asking, "Why did she do it?" Like the definition of "is," liberals don't know things objectively, rather only what they are told, what they choose to believe, and what they intended for things to mean.

Actual substance, definitions of words, indisputable facts are all things that can be explained away, understood to be something, anything other than what they actually are.

It actually stems from a very sad reality for them all, a lack of belief in absolute truth. If nothing can be seen, understood, or intended to be absolutely true--than nothing is true, everything is subjective, and the only person who gets to decide what is what is the person speaking at the moment. It's simple. Liberals believe that nothing that comes out of their own mouth can ever be classified as a lie. In the reality of liberals there is no objective record of fact or substance, only shades of interpretation.

Abortion is not taking the life of an innocent human being. Adultery is not engaging in oral sex with someone who is not your spouse. Marriage is not the sanctified union of a man and woman. Tax cuts can be given to people who do not pay taxes. Water-boarding is torture though it leaves no scars nor permanent damage. Nationalizing the banks, car companies, and mortgage industries is not socialism. Increasing gun control is not taking away second amendment rights of citizens. Closing Gitmo doesn't mean shutting it down. And for this president especially, letting born children starve to death in soiled hospital utility closets is just allowing a woman the right to choose."

Goldberg and Hannity on the MSM atheism agenda.

University's promote a diversity of THEIR singular opinion.

"The colleges have been transformed," said David Horowitz, whose organization, Students for Academic Freedom, tracks ideological bias on campus. "They're now these partisan institutions. They're not going to change."

Horowitz ran a study in 2003 that looked at commencement speakers at 32 top institutions in the U.S. for the previous 10 years. He found that liberals and Democrats were favored over conservatives by a ratio of 15-1. And then he stopped counting. "It's permanent. It's not going to change, partly because there's so little attention being paid to it," he told FOXNews.com"

Nancy 'take my wife'...Pelosi!, is a simple minded, utterly spineless and treasonous liar. Though she is a world-class venal twerp, inside-trading corruptocrat and dimwit too. Mark Steyn dissects Pelosi: “..Speaker Pelosi is a contemptible opportunist hack playing the cheapest but most destructive kind of politics with key elements of national security..

It's worth noting that, by most if not all of her multiple accounts, Nancy Pelosi is as guilty of torture as anybody else. That's not an airy rhetorical flourish but a statement of law. As National Review's Andy McCarthy points out, under Section 2340A(c) of the relevant statute, a person who conspires to torture is subject to the same penalties as the actual torturer. Once Speaker Pelosi was informed that waterboarding was part of the plan and that it was actually being used, she was in on the conspiracy, and as up to her neck in it as whoever it was who was actually sticking it to poor old Abu Zubaydah and the other blameless lads.

Well, sure. It's the Miss USA standard of political integrity: Carrie Prejean and Barack Obama have the same publicly stated views on gay marriage. But the politically correct enforcers know that Barack doesn't mean it, so that's okay, whereas Carrie does, so that's a hate crime. In the torture debate, Pelosi is Obama and Dick Cheney is Carrie Prejean. Dick means it, because to him this is an issue of national security. Nancy doesn't, because to her it's about the shifting breezes of political viability.”

Phyllis Chessler on how the murderous burden of the lie of multicultism falls on women and female children:

“The Afghan-Canadian brother, Hasibullah Sadiqi, who killed his sister and her fiancé in Ottawa and who is now standing trial, came to Canada when he was five months old. Nevertheless, Hasibullah enacted ancient tribal, (or radically Islamic codes), despite the fact that he had been living in the West for more than twenty one years.

Many male immigrants look as if they’ve assimilated to western ways. They dress in western attire, speak the language of their adopted country, study, socialize with, and work alongside native citizens. They may do all these things even if they wear Muslim, Sikh, or Hindu religious attire.

When it comes to many female immigrants, especially if they are Muslim, things are different. The women are forced into (or “choose”) to wear hijab, niqab, burq’a, or chador. Their movements are closely supervised and monitored. They suffer daily threats: If they do anything that is viewed as “too western,” or do anything against their parents wishes, they will be beaten, cursed, grounded, stalked, spied on, and threatened with death...right now, there are 100 girls being sheltered in hiding to protect them from honor-related violence in just one Swedish county. (Vastra Gotaland). Protecting each one costs “1,500-3,500 kroner a day. “ Multiply that by every county in Sweden.”

Via Hugh Hewitt at townhall, Hitch crushes middle-aged “schoolgirl” Maureen Dowd and Pelosi the super lying, twittering twit. For the top echelons of the Democrat left et al, a life of opportunistic and well paid Marxist mediocrity, corruption, incompetence and intern blow jobs, IS a life. Go figure. And the GOP is an oft spineless, hollowed out shell. And may God help us all.

Know only this, that the enemy of all free, productive, sane, moral and authentic human beings is the naturally radical left and nihilist Islam.

Muslims in Norway everyday and everynight. An authentic Muslim will always plan to kill you. It's just a matter of time and opportunity. Think Assassins, who were an Arab tribe. No really.



"The Genocidal Harvest of Leftist Self-Loathing By Andrew G. Bostom Wednesday, April 08, 2009.

In a recent blog, I described how a courageous modern “traditional liberal” politician, Geert Wilders, aptly warns of the dangers posed by the ancient, but living totalitarianism of Islam, an entirely unreformed, and unrepentant religio-political system.

Why does the Left—from the more vociferous, to the (outwardly) sober—openly embrace, or rationalize, or at very best ignore and fail to condemn—the totalitarian scourge of contemporary jihadism, and all its accompanying “sacralized” Islamic ugliness: genocidal hatred of non-Muslims, Muslim “apostate” freethinkers, and women?”

Colonel Neville: Why indeed. Cos they're the same kinda nihilist and narcissistic people who hate free individuals that just won't obey and respect them. Essentially jealous, self-loathing, dangerously envious control freak mediocrities, they must therefore project at all costs, an image of themslves as ENTIRELY RIGHT ABOUT EVERYTHING and the ONLY VALID SHOW IN TOWN...or else.

Naturally the complete opposite is true and thus they must shut you up or kill you to stop you ever mentioning this. Go figure. So dig. Thus we get the life-time Marxist con-man creep Barry Hussein Sotoero Barack Obama and an entire world, drowning and lost in a fog and fear of dhimmitude.

Don't do or say anything to offend the Muslims so don't mention the Jihad! What offends Muslims can be narrowed down to precisely everything and nothing.

No, mustn't. Hey, to any practicing Muslims who really believe in all that is Mad Mohammad, the filth of the Krazy Koran and the nihilist fascist totalitarian political project of Islam, I bid a hearty fu..., er golly, no thanks! If I ever want to commit cultural and security suicide, I can always do it myself. Sadly, the left is doing it for as as rapidly as possible.

Why? Cos it's for the "greater good"silly! File under the "fear and self-loathing" of dhimmitude. Bat Ye'or excerpt. Andrew Bostom and here via Amazon on dhimmitude.

Via dhimmitude org. Via americancongressfortruth com, here's Brigitte Gabriel, the Lebanese Christian and best selling author of Why They Hate. It's all about how Muslims murdered and destroyed the once free and prosperous Lebanon. How?

By using the multiculturalism, PC'ism, tolerance and open cosmopolitanism of the host and largely Christian, secular majority against them. And with Islam.

"It could happen soon, for you". Jimi Hendrix.

Now I'm rather pre-occupied of late as many of us are, know what I mean? And I don't have the time to write just now. So I thought it's a great chance to put up a lot of essential stuff I've picked up lately on the diseased mind-sets of leftards and Muslims, together in beddy byes at last. Well, that's the plan, but no, really.

All the best from Colonel Neville.


Via the truly fabulous roadsassy com:

“It matters little if Barack Hussein Obama attended a madrassa or not. The politics of the the left and it’s stepchild, black liberation theology, resonate on a core, essential level with Islam.

European Muslims are presently exercising the political and cultural muscle that their American counterparts are working towards. A democrat/socialist in the White House will accelerate their progress. Obama in the White House will guarantee it.”

Bill Warner, Center for the Study of Political Islam:

Barack Obama has closely aligned himself with Reverend Jeremiah Wright and Black Liberation Theology (BLT). When viewed from the Christian point-of-view, BLT is a strange creed, but when seen from the standpoint of Islam, there is a very strong parallel.

Islam and BLT are theologies that have a political goal of making all politics submit to their demands. Submission is the political goal.

Islam and BLT are both based upon the principle of duality. The Koran divides up humanity into Muslims and the kafirs (unbelievers). BLT has a god that divides humanity into blacks and whites. But the duality is not the division, but a complete separation that is ethical, political, cultural and religious. The believer has nothing in common with the kafir/white. Allah loves the Muslim and a black god loves the blacks.

Allah preaches violence against the kafirs and helps Muslims to kill them. The Koran says that cruelty and hatred of the kafir is a sacred duty for Muslims.

BLT does not preach violence against whites, but excuses and justifies it. BLT also justifies black crime as a legal way for oppressed blacks to strike back at the white oppressors. It sees a rapist or killer of whites as a revolutionary committing a legitimate act of a just war. Here we have a quote from James Cone, the father of BLT:

“What we need is the divine love as expressed in black power, which is the power of blacks to destroy their oppressors, here and now, by any and all means at their disposal” [James Cone, A Black Theology of Liberation, p. 70]”

“The reason for so many parallels between Islam and BLT is that they are both based upon the same principles—submission and duality. Since Islam views white America as an enemy, BLT see Islam as the “enemy of my enemy” and therefore is a friend.

Witness the award that Rev. Wright gave Louis Farrakhan as an outstanding person.

This comradeship is temporary. When the time comes and Islam is fully ascendant, BLT will find out that Islam has been using them, just as Islam uses the Left. In the end, Islam will annihilate BLT for the simple reason that Islam demands political submission from ALL, not the just the whites.”


Gloomwatch Update Mark Steyn.

"I called the last week the "Obama Apology Tour." Caroline Glick thinks it was more of an Obama Appeasement Tour:

AMERICA'S BETRAYAL of its democratic allies makes each of them more vulnerable to aggression at the hands of their enemies - enemies the Obama administration is now actively attempting to appease. And as the US strengthens their adversaries at their expense, these spurned democracies must consider their options for surviving as free societies in this new, threatening, post-American environment...

If they do so successfully, then the damage to global security induced by Obama's emasculation of his country will be limited. If on the other hand, they fail, then America's eventual return to its senses will likely come too late for its allies - if not for America itself.

As I said the other day, this presidency has the makings of global tragedy. To modify a Bernard Lewis line, Obama's speeches risk giving the impression that America is "harmless as an enemy and treacherous as a friend." That's not a good message to send the world.

Distractions by Mark Steyn:

“In a world of legalisms, resistance is futile. The Royal Navy sailors kidnapped by Iran two years ago and humiliated by the mullahs on TV were operating under rules of engagement that call for "de-escalation" in the event of a confrontation. Which is to say their rules of engagement are rules of nonengagement.

Likewise, merchant vessels equipped with cannon in the 18th century now sail unarmed. They contract with expensive private security firms, but those security teams do not carry guns: When the MV Biscaglia was seized by pirates in the Gulf of Aden last year, the Indian and Bangladeshi crew were taken hostage but the three unarmed guards from "Anti-Piracy Maritime Security Solutions" in London "escaped by jumping into the water." Some solution. When you make a lucrative activity low-risk, you get more of it.

As my colleague Andrew McCarthy wrote, "Civilization is not an evolution of mankind but the imposition of human good on human evil. It is not a historical inevitability. It is a battle that has to be fought every day, because evil doesn't recede willingly before the wheels of progress." Very true. Somalia, Iran and North Korea are all less "civilized" than they were a couple of generations ago.


And yet in one sense they have made undeniable progress: They have globalized their pathologies. Somali pirates seize vessels the size of aircraft carriers flying the ensigns of the great powers. Iranian proxies run Gaza and much of Lebanon. North Korea's impoverished prison state provides nuclear technology to Damascus and Tehran. Unlovely as it is, Pyongyang nevertheless has friends on the Security Council. Powerful states protect one-man psycho states. One-man psycho states provide delivery systems to apocalyptic ideological states. Apocalyptic ideological states fund nonstate actors around the world. And in Somalia and elsewhere nonstate actors are constrained only by their ever increasing capabilities.

When all the world's a "distraction," maybe you're not the main event after all. Most wealthy nations lack the means to defend themselves. Those few that do, lack the will. Meanwhile, basket-case jurisdictions send out ever bolder freelance marauders to prey on the civilized world with impunity. Don't be surprised if "the civilized world" shrivels and retreats in the face of state-of-the-art reprimitivization. From piracy to nukes to the limp response of the hyperpower, this is not a "distraction" but a portent of the future.”


Via roadsassy com:

“I ran into an article that I printed out a few years back on the “arab personality” that, at the time, provided me with much needed insight into the behavior of Islamists. It’s worth reading if you want to get a grasp of the muslims inverted sense of honor as well as their disconcerting similarities to the left. It appears that mohammad (spit) found in Arabs a society quite amenable to the claustrophobic conrtol that Islam exerts, just as the left finds comfort in such fatuous notions of “the greater good” or the idea of sacrificing “the one for the all.”

Here are a couple excerpts:

Arab society is tribal-nomadic, with its outstanding trait being clan loyalty and the anarchy of the desert. Most of its values were shaped in the jahiliyah age before Islam. The important values in Arab conceptions and behavior reflect the pre-Islamic ideals. In the jahiliyah age, “The Arabs did not know Allah and his Messenger and the rules of the religion.”

Despite their desert character, the city was the Arabs’ focus of change and political activity. Mecca was a center of trade and pilgrimage, since it was on the caravan routes. Religion had secondary importance in jahili society. Religious customs were observed out of tradition and feelings of respect for forefathers, but religion was fetishist, and values were fatalistic, out of absolute faith in the decrees of fate. Secular values took a central place, and were expressed in the concept of manliness (muruwwah), which meant the whole set of traits of a perfect Bedouin. The most important framework was preserving tribal solidarity (`asabiyyah). The tribe was the foundation for personal and group existence.

The critical phenomenon in its importance to Arab-Islamic society is honor. A man’s honor is sharaf. It is flexible, dynamic, and subject to change in accord with his deeds. A woman’s honor is `ird (also meaning her pelvis). In contrast to a man’s honor, this is firm and permanent. The woman grows up with her honor, and her most important role is to preserve it.

The moment that a woman’s honor is lost, it cannot be restored, and a man’s honor is severely wounded. Indeed, Muslim society is based on the virginity of its daughters. Honor is the most important supreme value in Arab life, more important than life itself. A man without honor is considered dead.

Hence the saying, “It is better to die with honor than live with humiliation.”

A man’s place in the tribe, as well as the tribe’s place among the tribes, was according to the measure of his and its honor. When honor was harmed, shame was caused which originated in public exposure, overt to everyone, a phenomenon which severely humiliated a man. Indeed, the Arab individual is caught up throughout his whole life in intensive activity to avoid shame and advance his honor. The central means for this was vengeance. Honor is restored only when vengeance has been carried out in public and is known to all.

Tribal tradition and clan loyalty had dominant influence in society. Likewise significant were blood ties within the extended family or the tribe, which determined group loyalties and identifications. Most of these social traits exist to this day, and influence the functioning of Arab society as a primordial system in which symbolic values are more important and esteemed than concrete values and the overall, holistic system of beliefs. This is “a shame society”, in which everyone must behave according to the accepted norms and internalize his own feelings in the system of group behavior.

Good lord if that isn’t a working definition of your typical garden variety amerikkan progressive. And shame is a tool that the left wields with great aplomb.. Again I am reminded why the left and Islam do so well in bed together. About the only difference is the left doesn’t embrace a moon god, unless of course you count Al Gore or Obama.

I once read that the series “Friends” faithfully portrays the new type of American family. Severed from meaningful family ties, young people find their identity in the group - be it the one who gathers at the neighborhood pub or those who seek their validity and connection in a tribe like those gathering around Obama. Or Hillary with her detestable “it takes a village”. None of which can provide society with the stability that the family unit can exert.

F. A. Hayek, whose classic work The Road to Serfdom (1944) was a shot across the bow of triumphal statism, connected socialism to primitive tribalism and a yearning for the solidarity and the morality of small groups, a yearning which, if extended much beyond the family, would prove incompatible with the requirements of the extended market order. The great novelist Robert Musil (1990 [1921]: 109), another Austrian critic of both nationalism and socialism, observed that socialism is “stuck in the ethics of fraternity.” The morality appropriate for family members is, however, quite different from that appropriate for governing the relations of the countless strangers one encounters in an extended order.

The following paragraph could easily describe ReProgressives. Substitute Marxism, socialism or progressivism for the words Islam or Arab.

The Arab:

“This reality expressed too the collective’s superiority over the individual. In contrast to modern societies which promote the individual’s interests, and in which the ethos is what the individual takes and receives from the generality, in Arab society, the ethos is what the individual does for the collective. There is a communal consensus in contrast to an individual’s opinion. Islam does not encourage individualism, rather favoring organized, orderly authority.

The individual does not exist by his own right, and he and his opinions are unimportant, except through his belonging to a group framework. This is based on the hadith attributed to the Prophet: “The opinion of the many cannot be mistaken.” There is nothing more contemptible than individualism, which is viewed as factionalism and as harming the achievement of goals.

This is also the basis for the attitude towards political opposition, which is not accepted in principle.

Jews and Christians internalize the guilt. The Jews extend one cheek in the sense of, “We have sinned, we have transgressed, we have committed crimes,” while Christians extend the second cheek, in the sense of “mea culpa”.

In contrast, the Arabs externalize guilt: “Do I have a problem? – You are guilty!” Among them, there is no attempt to compromise. They have no tolerance for the justice and rights of the other. From their vantage point, justice and rights are totally on their side, and nothing will divert them from their total, one-sided position. Among Arabs, you will not find the phenomenon so typical of Judeo-Christian culture: doubts, a sense of guilt, the self-tormenting approach, “Maybe we were not entirely OK,” or “Maybe we need to act or react differently.” These phenomena are totally unknown in Arab-Islamic society, towards outsiders.

They have no doubts about their positions or the justice of their side. They have no sense of guilt that they may have erred. They have neither twinges of conscience nor any regrets that they may have done wrong to anyone else. From their viewpoint, they have no problem concerning unbelievers, and no difficulty accusing or acting against those who do not live in dar al-harb. The phenomenon of the murderers by suicide, sometimes called suicide bombers, is an absolute indication.

There is no condemnation, no regret, no problem of conscience among Arabs and Muslims, anywhere, in any social stratum, of any social position. For the most part, there is total support without reservations.”