Why mass murdering Communism fails and mass murdering Islam is a successful vampire at large in the free West.

Via MrPatriot17176. Why CoMmUnIsM FailS. Because it's nihilist, insane and based entirely on murder, conformity, envy, spite and lies. Gee, just like the people who thought of it. Hey, I ain't sayin' that Marxist product sodden leftard liberalism hasn't been massively successful in infiltrating and damaging the West. It has. It's in the very air we breathe. Personally, this is why I never inhaled.



“Those who deny freedom for others deserve it not for themselves and under a just God cannot retain it.” Lincoln.

A dimwit hippie earlier this week on an SBS doco on GM crops. It was slightly above their usual dismal and mediocre non-standard, but not that much: “I don’t like GM food. I don’t like messing around with nature. Nature is love and you don’t mess around with love.” You are dumber than doghair but unlike doghair you serve no useful purpose whatsoever.

Glenn Beck, Jonah Goldberg and a scholarly host of others, present the harsh unfashionable truth of "progressive" Marxist leftist fascist Nazi totalitarian history. No really. It's outstanding. Part one of four?

[Here's networkedblogs com with the entire thang...]

Live Free or Die: the Revolutionary Holocaust.



PJTV on liberty or death in Iran.

PJTV and Zo [machosauce] on the kinda government we shouldn't have.


Jonah Goldberg with a brilliant empirical in 6 parts on "progressive" left liberal fascism.



Via the fabbo thedestructionofbritain blogspot, a brilliant Fjordman article.

Colonel Neville: Sure I have dreams. Small dreams but they’re mine. Gee, I wish I could have got to shoot Mao, Stalin, Che, Pol Pot, Ho Chi Minh and the rest, but I was so young.

Still, I may just get a chance to wack Kim Song, Mugabe, the Castro twins, much of the House of Saud, Ahmadinejad and most of the Iranian theocracy, Chavez and Sean Penn etc, etc. Maybe not. But a man can dream, eh?

For instance, at the front of an avenging Cameron model Terminator army, I want to liberate North Korea, Cuba, Iran and Zimbabwe etc, etc. As in WWll but more thoroughly, I want to kill all their leadership, completely dismantle the rotten totalitarian systems they are imprisoned under and convert to secular capitalist democracy via the Judeo Christian Western Canon.

This seems an entirely fair and rational trade for insane and nihilist belief systems that wish to enslave and murder me, millions of others and destroy everything I value. The point is that we can either do this ASAP, or wait until the inevitable fight to the death with such madhouse freaks in our own planes and streets as we already are, or nuke them. For the consolation prize of freedom we have ten seconds starting now...

Of course the handful of largely Anglophile countries that still almost value their freedom may need the support of the non-impotent parts of the EU that don’t. SO there’s really nobody much, beyond the fading same few states that won WWll and the Cold War and were finally liberated from the murderous Soviets. Thus we are all doomed to a slow death from combined internal Marxist leftardism and Islamisation, or a rearguard action at one minute to midnight or 12:20 am. No really. Like duh.

“A single death is a tragedy. A million deaths is a statistic.” Joseph Stalin.

'Entire families put in GLASS GAS CHAMBERS” by an escapee from North Korea: "I witnessed entire families being tested on suffocating gas and dying in the gas chamber” he said. “The parents, a son and a daughter. The parents were vomiting and dying, but until the very last moment they tried to save [their] kids by doing mouth to mouth breathing.”

Via answeringmuslims com, the great islaminaction blogspot and acts17.net, Muslim mob and security deceive, entrap, threaten and assualt Christians at a gee, learn about Islam festival! Hahahaha. Hey ya actually do.

This is almost all you need to know about the truth of Islam in your neighbourhood. Except for the stuff that is much, much worse. Go to the previous link for that. [Via atlasshrugs.]

Eyesisyou: "hey, welcome to how we live in europe. everywhere muslims are using violence to get done what they want. well, get ready for all of this to get much worse now that America has a muslim president!”

"Arm yourselves, and be ye men of valor, and be in readiness for the conflict; for it is better for us to perish in battle than to look upon the outrage of our nation and our altar. As the Will of God is in Heaven, even so let it be."

Winston Churchill, channeling Judah HaMaccabee (1 Maccabees 3:58-60) on May 19, 1940 at the climax of his first broadcast as Prime Minister."

George Orwell's novel on the mass conformist collectivist totalitarian fascism of the left: 1984:

"We shall abolish the orgasm. Our neurologists are at work upon it now. There will be no loyalty, except loyalty towards the Party. There will be no love, except the love of Big Brother.

There will be no laughter, except the laugh of triumph over a defeated enemy. There will be no art, no literature, no science. When we are omnipotent there will be no need of science. There will be no distinction between beauty and ugliness. There will be no curiosity, no enjoyment of the process of life.

All competing pleasures will be destroyed. But always—do not forget this Winston—always there will be the intoxication of power, constantly increasing and constantly growing subtler. Always, at every moment, there will be the thrill of victory, the sensation of trampling on an enemy who is helpless. If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face—forever."

The causes of the first democratic revolution.




Listening to a reading of a Martin Luther King speech Bill Clinton too, has a dream. Clinton slept through the 1993 World Trade Centre bombing, the Marine Barracks attack and the blasting of the USS Cole etc, etc. Clinton was entirely energised and fully awake for any applause, blow jobs and Saudi ca$h.




“..probably because it wasn't all about them”, the Clintons BOTH fall asleep during President Reagan’s funeral. Toward the end Bill turns into a wax likeness of a British Butler.robcleary com.




Hillary’s blow job.




Via the ocregister, Richard E. Ralston: “What should we think of the claim that a public option will be more efficient and less expensive than private insurance? That is less complicated and less Orwellian. It is just a lie.

President Barack Obama has frequently reassured us that, if we are happy with our present insurance, there is no cause for alarm – our right to keep it will not be denied. Of course, private insurance will no longer exist in a few years, so the right to keep it is pointless. A new "public option" would provide employers with a strong financial incentive to drop private insurance.

Your right to keep your individual insurance will be meaningless when it cannot compete with government insurance. Private insurers will be forced out of the game as the public plan draws unlimited credit from a government cashier playing with a stacked deck from a dealer who forces the other players to cover the government's bets. Yet this is the solution offered to head off the so-called "predatory" nature of a free market, in the name of promoting "healthy competition."

Evidently competition is good in doublespeak – when it means eliminating competition.

We are also told that Medicare is very popular with senior citizens, so most Americans will embrace the public option even if it destroys the other options. Then why is every retiree, after a lifetime of paying Social Security and Medicare taxes, denied a Social Security pension if they do not participate in Medicare Part A insurance? Medicare is so popular that anyone who declines to participate has his monthly Social Security payments taken away.

At the core of the deception is a destruction of the concept of individual rights. Why, in a free country, should the government be allowed to seize control of any part of the health care industry? Because, we are told, everyone has a "right" to health care. By this they mean the exact opposite: No one has the right to any health care at all – except what the government provides and controls. The word "right" is used to destroy any true right – the freedom of individuals to pursue or provide health care in a market without coercion.

Government intervention requires tyranny, because the government cannot give anyone health care unless it takes it from someone else or forces someone to supply it.”

“Andrew Bolt Wednesday, July 01, 2009 at 09:01am.

What is it with the Left and violence?

THE Green Left Weekly is probably Australia’s best-known radical-left newspaper. While nominally independent, it is affiliated with the Socialist Alliance party and its youth movement Resistance! Like most radical socialist groups, it invariably aligns with the anti-Israel movement.

For some time it has been apparent that an unholy alliance is growing between extreme left-wing groups and Arab and Islamic extremists, despite completely different visions for society...

But what isn’t widely known is that the Green Left Weekly is openly promoting extremism among Arabic speakers in Australia through a monthly Arabic-language insert called the Flame. This support is not limited to Green Left Weekly’s own far-left agenda. It supports terrorist groups and promotes violence as the solution to the existence of the “Zionist state.”

You would think GLW’s declared pursuit of the advancement of “anti-racist, feminist, student, trade union, environment, gay and lesbian, civil liberties” would rule out the promotion of radical Islamist groups such as Hamas, which are deeply hostile to all the above.”


Before the death of Michael Jackson, here’s a major kind of popular focus of millions. Inaccuracies in Paris Hilton interview.

The Lefts Assault on Language Mirrors and Supports the Islamic Assault on Female Genitals.

Insane Saudi Sheik/Cleric/circus freak interviewed by Leftard hack Paul asshat Auster, rather ironically on the right. [See the second article by Caroline Glick titled the Lefts Assault On Language.]




Dig, I dedicate this post once again to the truly great women who run stophounourkillings, and to the women at the slightly peculiar rawa org, who nonetheless have a vast resource with serious insight into worthy essentials. You know the drill.


In the tedious MSM, Arab religioso head geeks and freaks, are laughably referred to as "top clerics" or "spiritual leaders" either of the Saudi or other wasteland stripe, and they are.

All one apparently needs to qualify for such a drooling moniker, is gross intellectual and emotional retardation, a mindset permanently attuned to the criminal as normal and thus possessing of the required and relentless psychopathology.

Basically, one must be stark raving mad, or you'll fail the interview.

Dig the teeth. He’s borrowing them from his camel. I have a whole hideous gallery of these mutilation pics and this, yes this vile crime and standard cultural practice is one of the least repulsive. Nope, I don’t mean the emotional and mental spastic on the left, who is a major advocate for the mutilation on the right.

Now it’s a well known fact that not a single lip licking advocate of depravity without limits via the genital mutilation of female children, has demanded that someone slice off their wanger with a blunt razor. Though I’d be willing to do a free consultation for any dirty Imam shit Sheik or other faux titled criminal butcher and Islamist psychopath.

"Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." Pope Benedict, 2006. Groovy link via moonbatcentral.


Why millions of Muslims are inbred, irrational and beyond reach dysfunctionals. Via Yahoo news.

Edited extract: “Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric was quoted on Wednesday as saying it is permissible for 10-year-old girls to marry and those who think they're too young are doing the girls an injustice.

Sheik Abdul-Aziz Al Sheikh, grand mufti, said during a lecture that those who say women should not marry before the age of 25 are following a "bad path," according to the pan-Arab Al-Hayat newspaper.

...about parents who force their underage daughters to marry, the mufti said: "We hear a lot about the marriage of underage girls in the media, and we should know that Islamic law has not brought injustice to women."

"For it to be said that it's not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger is wrong," Al Sheikh was quoted as saying.

"A female who is 10 or 12 is marriageable and those who think she's too young are wrong and are being unfair to her." The mufti said a good upbringing will make a girl capable of carrying out her duties as a wife.

"Our mothers and before them our grandmothers married when they were barely 12," said Al Sheikh, according to Al-Hayat.

...it's also not clear whether these unions are on the rise or whether people are hearing about them more now because of the prevalence of media outlets and easy access to the Internet.

Activists say the girls are given away in return for hefty dowries or as a result of long-standing custom in which a father promises his infant daughters and sons to cousins out of a belief that marriage will protect them from illicit relationships”.


"The most fundamental fact about the ideas of the political Left, is that they do not work. Therefore we should not be surprised to find the Left concentrated in institution's where ideas do not have to work in order to survive". Thomas Sowell.

Colonel Neville: Think unversities, government, activist groups, unions, Hollywood, music and celebrity and so on.


Extract: "Our World: The Left's Assault on Language by Caroline Glick, THE JERUSALEM POST Nov. 3, 2008.

THE LEFT's co-optation of the language of law and democracy is not limited to geopolitics. It extends to issues of cultural politics as well. Take feminism for example. Education Minister Yuli Tamir fancies herself a great champion of women's rights. She has written about feminism and the need for women to have mandated equal representation in both public and private forums.

In all of her work on behalf of women's issues, Tamir has been clear that a society's refusal to mandate full equality for women goes hand in hand with militarism and other violent and anti-liberal tendencies. And yet, in 1996, while a visiting professor at Harvard, Tamir authored an article defending female genital mutilation in the Arab world.

In the Islamic world, girls are forced to undergo clitoridectomies to deprive them of sexual pleasure and so "preserve" their "modesty." Yet Tamir argued in her article, "Hands off Clitoridectomy," published in The Boston Review, it is wrong to oppose the practice because doing so requires a rejection of multiculturalism.

As she put it, opponents of the barbaric practice, "intentionally widen the gap between our culture and those in which clitoridectomy is practiced, thus presenting those other cultures as incommensurable with ours. The effect of this distancing is to disconnect criticism of their practices from criticism of our own, and turn reflection on other cultures into yet another occasion for celebrating our special virtues."

Celebrating Western virtues is a no-no for Tamir, because doing so makes us likely to defend those values at the expense of her leftist appeasement agenda. If the West judges Arab societies that mutilate women and girls objectionable, it is likely to judge appeasing them as objectionable and so reject the political message of Tamir and her comrades. And so, as she sees it, it behoves "feminists" like her to defend clitoridectomies, which she did in that article.

As far as Tamir is concerned, cutting out a girl's genitalia is no different from pulling her teeth. As she put it, "Removing a tooth is also a painful procedure, often imposed on children, and if performed in non-hygienic conditions, it can produce permanent damage." Tamir then went on to say that criticizing female genital mutilation is itself an act of misogyny because by expressing concern for the practice, critics objectify women. They reduce them to mere sexual objects.

So for Tamir the feminist, rejecting the superiority of Western culture - which allows her to freely express her views, vote, run for office, own property and control the fate of her genitals - over Islamic culture - which allows her to do none of these things - is more important than defending women. Indeed, she is willing to empty the rhetoric of women's rights of all intrinsic meaning to advance the interests of her radical leftist ideological platform against its rightist rivals who trenchantly criticize the mutilation of women and girls.

AND, OF course, Tamir is not alone.

In the US presidential race, American feminists have lost all credibility as champions of women's rights in their support for the often pornographic, openly misogynist and unabashedly chauvinist assaults against Governor Sarah Palin. Kim Gandy, the leader of the National Organization for Women, has argued that due to Palin's opposition to abortion, she is not a woman. [Dr Sanity on the how and why of the appalling criminal treatment of Sarah Palin. The groovy Deborah Gyapong picked it up too.]

Ignoring her record of service and achievement in Alaskan politics, leftist commentators and politicians have attacked her clothes, her shoes, her hair, her glasses, her children, her figure. They have insinuated perverted sexual proclivities and they accused her of everything from harlotry to illiteracy.

In an interview with Yediot Aharonot on Friday, the leftist American novelist Paul Auster, [GREAT link via rovianconspiracy on Auster the Leftard pervert and closet rapist] said of Palin, "There is something erotic about Palin that attracts people to her. Someone said that she reminds him of a strict schoolmarm, who wears a stripper's costume under her modest clothing.

I know this might sound funny, but I think that a lot of men are attracted to her and fantasize about being with her in bed. Particularly because she is conservative and far from all these erotic descriptions, the fantasy becomes even more powerful."

Auster then warned that if Palin is elected vice president, "a lot of good values will disappear from this country and we will become an evil, ugly country."

It apparently never occurred to him that his "funny" statements about Palin are the very epitome of ugliness and the absence of values like decency, tolerance and respect for women. And that's the thing of it.

THE ESSENCE of liberal democracy - the edifice on which liberalism and the democratic form of government were built - is reasoned discourse. Reasoned discourse can only take place when words like "values," "democracy," "law," "rights" and "equality" have intrinsic meanings that all members of society accept. When the Left empties these terms of their fundamental meaning and uses them only to enhance its political power at the expense of the Right, reasoned discourse is abandoned in favour of propaganda.

When equal rights are the exclusive privilege of leftist women rather than the natural right of all women, no woman can ever trust that her rights will be preserved. When the rhetoric of law is abused to advance the political power of the Left instead of defending the cause of blind justice, the rule of law is sacrificed in the name of leftist tyranny. When the cause of a nation is ignored in the interest of the fortunes of a faction, the fortunes of that faction will be advanced at the expense of the nation.

Auster told Yediot that the political discourse in the US has become so charged that dialogue is no longer possible between leftists and rightists. In his words, "We have reached a point where the two sides are no longer capable of speaking to one another, and I view this situation as a sort of civil war. There are no weapons or shooting. This is a civil war of ideas and separate ways of thinking, and often a war of ideas is the worst sort of war."

Auster's statement is true, and it applies to the entire Western world. But it is also true that one side bears the brunt of responsibility for the absence of discourse. The side that has destroyed the meaning of democracy, liberalism, feminism and racism to castigate and criminalize its political opponents is responsible for the absence of dialogue. And until the Left is compelled to acknowledge the intrinsic meaning of words rather than use vocabulary as a tool of political warfare, it is hard to see how this situation will improve.
caroline@carolineglick.com


The character Syme discussing Newspeak with Winston Smith, in the George Orwell book 1984 via Hotair.

"It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms.

After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take “good”, for instance.

If you have a word like “good”, what need is there for a word like “bad”? “Ungood” will do just as well — better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of “good”, what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like “excellent” and “splendid” and all the rest of them?

“Plusgood” covers the meaning, or “ doubleplusgood” if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words—in reality, only one word.

...Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year".