Le Colonel Neville s’habille Tojours Pour le Diner. Semper Fi. Thomas Sowell: "There are three questions that I think would destroy most of the arguments on the left. The first is compared to what? The second is at what cost and the third is what hard evidence do you have?” Live free or die or both. Satirical empirical conservative. No, really.
Via the great zombietime com: In 1977 John Holdren, Obamas zombietime Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy dreamed and wrote about forced sterilisation and a global socialist totalitarian regime etc. He still has that beautiful totalitarian dream in the service of Gaia. No really.
Mark Steyn and Sean Hannity on the fabulous Obama tax cheat administration.
“Advocating for population control comes down to there’s too many of you and just enough of me!”P.J O’Rourke. [From memory.]
Another day and it’s always another collectivist socialist elitist dirt bag with Saul Alinsky student/teacher and Bill Ayers pal The Obamessiah. What a fucking waking nightmare this twisted Manchurian Candidate phony fuck Barry Hussein Sotoero Barack Obama clearly is. The Obama Timeline.
And new killer Candidates everyday. Are they podding these bastards? In Invasion Of The Body Snatchers they used gasoline and a lighter. [Link to Bill Whittle at PJTV.]
Via Michelle Malkin, the great Zombietime has done an exhaustive expose of recent beyond belief Obambi appointee, the hideous and unfit for any job, John Holdren. It’s all about the charming fascist global mass control book he co-wrote in 1977 advocating and I kid you not,
“Forced abortions. Mass sterilization. A "Planetary Regime" with the power of life and death over American citizens.”
This is what decades of Marxist product dealing left liberalism has wrought. [And sadly far too many semi to fake conservatives and Republicans:] smiley faced, [if you're lucky] fascist social elites dreaming of controlling by coercive stealth and overtly, evermore of our death filled existence from top to bottom. Holdren’s another of the endless Obamessiah rabble, of the forever living dead leftovers of the miserable 1960’s and 1970’s. Will they ever die off themselves? Not before they doom and kill us all.
Bert Pretlusky:“Speaking of liberal goofiness brings us inevitably to Barack Hussein Obama, as he now proudly identifies himself -- at least when he’s addressing Muslims, praising Muslims and, as usual, slandering America. By the way, isn’t it the least bit odd that he never condemns Muslims for clinging to their religion and their suicide bombs?”
Now being Zombie, it’s a meticulous and surgical crush as Zombie covers pretty much all the bases. Direct scans, photos and mucho proof that Holdren has not changed his views. On the contrary, like most of his ilk and The Obamessiah, he simply either airbrushes ‘em for now or merely CV's them in an easily acceptable form. And now Holdren has got himself the ultimate position to live out his fascist nihilist dreams and our nightmares. For a fab commentary and analysis go zombietime, young man. Meanwhile, read on terrified reader and may God help us all.
I Quote The Monster.
Director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy, Assistant to the President for Science and Technology, and Co-Chair of the President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology:
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
"One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it.
Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
“Involuntary fertility control...A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men...
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
"If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.”
"In today's world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”
“Toward a Planetary Regime....Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment.
Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.
The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries' shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”
“Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups. Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all. This is another case of the "tragedy of the commons," wherein the "commons" is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint.”
“Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants' destiny. Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world.”
Here's the always hip Mark Steyn at the ocregister on the natural bankruptcy of Globullshit Warming to help you clear the sour taste of vomit.
"...most of the developed world has already gone down the paved road of good intentions and is now frantically trying to pedal up out of it. New Zealand was one of the few Western nations to sign on to Kyoto and then attempt to abide by it – until New Zealanders realized they could only do so by destroying their economy.
They introduced a Dem-style cap-and-trade regime – and last year they suspended it.
In Australia, the Labor Government postponed implementation of its emissions-reduction program until 2011, and the Aussie Senate may scuttle it entirely. The Obama administration has gotten to the climate-change hop just as the glitter ball's stopped whirling, and the band's packing up its instruments.
Fossil fuel and cement emissions increased by 3.3 percent per year during 2000-06, compared to 1.3 percent per year in the 1990s. Similarly, atmospheric C02 concentrations increased by 1.93 parts per million per year during 2000-06, compared to 1.58 ppm in the 1990s. And yet, despite accelerating emission rates and concentrations, there's been no net warming in the 21st century and, more accurately, a decline."
Comment:“tominatl wrote: "The Atmosphere is 380 to 390 parts per million CO2. As a percentage that's 0.039%.
Man made CO2 runs, depending on whom you read, between 3 and 5% of annual world production of CO2. Mother Nature provides the other 95%.
Assuming the US produces 25% of man-made CO2 and assuming that all of that is eliminated, the decrease in annual world CO2 production will be 1.25% out of a maximum 5%. The reduction in parts per million of C02 in the atmosphere will not show until we get to, maybe, the fourth, fifth, or sixth decimal place. Anyone want to bet an economy on those numbers? On one ten-thousandth of one percent?
CO2 is believed by many to be a lagging indicator of global warming. In other words, nothing we do to control CO2 will affect temperature, because temperature rises first and CO2 increases as a result of the temperature. The lag time between elevating CO2 and climate change may be 800 years, in other words we don't have a clue and may not have a clue for several centuries.”
“"I am very interested in social developments in America (the New Deal). I believe that President Roosevelt has chosen the right path. We are dealing with the greatest social problems ever known (the great depression). Millions of unemployed must get their jobs back and this cannot be left to private initiative (free market capitalism). It is the government that must tackle the problem."Nazi Propaganda Minister Joseph Goebbels.
Barry denies ever being the lawyer, trainer and conman in Chief at the Whitehouse for ACORN! As you do... "I have never eaten cheese or listened to the radio.."
Barry saying and doing the exact opposite of the previous vid as you do. Along with Clinton, [who was so proud of his big socialist plan that got the penniless into a mortgage] planted many an ACORN and they grew into the financial disaster of today.
The always on the money machosauce on ACORN, Obama and Hell. How the dominant left liberal Democrat education system, MSM, celebrity etc, and current Obama Messiah, brainwash blacks and others with fraud, bias, welfare, abortion and grievance politics. It's a vastly evil sucker punch to maintain the Democratic voter base at ANY cost. Why? Cos it works everytime and it pay$. Three and a half trillion dollars can't be wrong.
Michelle Malkin and others, in a nice piece on Barry Hussein Sotoero Barack Obama and his perfectly in place Muslim beliefs. Big 'effing surprise. A Muslim bum Father and a radical Marxist atheist tart Mother, plus over twenty years in a Marxist black liberation theology fake church will do that to ya.
And dig Obama's cousin Odinga, the er, MUSLIM freak President and mass murderer loon of Kenya. Naturally Obama campaigned in 2006 for the Big O, as ya do. Odinga lost and his fans went on a rampage. Gee, a little like many a Barry fan was threatening to...
"If China and India had the same energy consumption as the average American, we'd have all melted by now.”President Barack Obama at G20 press conference.
Samson Obama is Obama's half brother, one of eleven such siblings, no really. Yeah, his Pop is a Muslim. Sadly, Samson has been stopped from entering Britain for er, molesting children. Hey, what can ya do...
"By Gloria De Piero, 11/04/2009.
AMERICAN president Barack Obama's half brother was REFUSED a visa to enter the UK after being accused of an attempted sex attack on a young girl in Berkshire. The News of the World can reveal that Kenya-based Samson Obama tried to get into Britain on his way to Washington for his family's big day, the historic inauguration in January.
But eagle-eyed immigration officials at East Midlands Airport, using the latest biometric tests, discovered he was linked to an incident here last November. The hi-tech database revealed that Samson - who manages a mobile phone shop just outside Nairobi - was the same man arrested by British police after he approached a group of young girls, including a 13 year-old, and allegedly tried to sexually assault one of them.
He then followed them into a cafe where he became aggressive and was asked to leave by the owner. That's when police were called and Samson was arrested.
A stewardess from nearby Nottingham told her local newspaper how she met him on his flight to America. Dawn Stewart, of Sherwood, described how Samson told her his nickname was Abo and said he was on his way to the US capital for the presidential swearing-in.
She recalled: "I asked him how he feels being the brother of the next president and he said, 'I can't tell you the depth of excitement we feel.'
"I asked what Barack was like as a teenager and he said he was always charismatic and calm."
The flight attendant said Samson claimed he had never travelled before and proudly showed her a headed letter from his half-brother requesting his three-week visa to the USA."
Colonel Neville: Gee, now where does that er Muslim thang come from?
The Saudi Arabian judge, Sheikh Habib Habib, ruled that the girl's marriage to a friend of her father's was legal and binding...
Sheikh Abdul Aziz Al-Sheikh,the kingdom's grand mufti, said last January there is nothing wrong with girls who are 15 or younger being married. "A girl aged 10 or 12 can be married," he told a local newspaper.
"Those who think she's too young are wrong and they are being unfair to her. "We should know that Sharia law has not brought injustice to women."
“If Justice Ginsburg is correct in her view that there is a global consensus on the great questions, then America is badly out of whack. And long may that continue: After my experience up north, I value the First Amendment all the more because it is at odds with the way the rest of the world is going.
“we are now so deep into government intervention that constitutional objections are summarily swept aside. The last Treasury secretary brought the nine largest banks into his office and informed them that henceforth he was their partner. His successor is seeking the power to seize any financial institution at his own discretion.
Despite these astonishments, I remain more amused than alarmed. First, the notion of presidential car warranties strikes me as simply too bizarre, too comical, to mark the beginning of Yankee Peronism...
Obama has far different ambitions. His goal is to rewrite the American social compact, to recast the relationship between government and citizen. He wants government to narrow the nation's income and anxiety gaps. Soak the rich for reasons of revenue and justice. Nationalize health care and federalize education to grant all citizens of all classes the freedom from anxiety about health care and college that the rich enjoy. And fund this vast new social safety net through the cash cow of a disguised carbon tax.
Obama is a leveler. [Colonel Neville: Just not for himself.]
He has come to narrow the divide between rich and poor. For him the ultimate social value is fairness. Imposing it upon the American social order is his mission. Fairness through leveling is the essence of Obamaism. (Asked by Charlie Gibson during a campaign debate about his support for raising capital gains taxes -- even if they caused a net revenue loss to the government -- Obama stuck to the tax hike "for purposes of fairness.") The elements are highly progressive taxation, federalized health care and higher education, and revenue-producing energy controls.
But first he must deal with the sideshows. They could sink the economy and poison his public support before he gets to enact his real agenda.
It will come from Obama's real agenda: his holy trinity of health care, education and energy. Out of these will come a radical extension of the welfare state; social and economic leveling in the name of fairness; and a massive increase in the size, scope and reach of government.
Good evening. As you know, early yesterday, Somali-based pirates attacked the Maersk Alabama, a freighter carrying relief supplies to Kenya. While we do not yet know all the details, the Alabama's crew re-took control of the vessel and forced the pirates off the ship.
Since the pirates are still holding the captain, I have sent FBI negotiators to facilitate his safe and speedy release. I assure his friends and family that I will not stop until this man-made disaster is resolved in a peaceful, tolerant and ecologically-sound manner.
Obviously, this incident has raised many concerns among Americans. There have been calls for justice and even violence against the misguided perpetrators. But such an emotional reaction has led to the disparagement of entire groups with which we are unfamiliar. We have seen this throughout history.
For too long, America has been too dismissive of the proud culture and invaluable contributions of the Pirate Community. Whether it is their pioneering work with prosthetics, husbandry of tropical birds or fanciful fashion sense, America owes a deep debt to Pirates.
The past eight years have shown a failure to appreciate the historic role of these noble seafarers. Instead of celebrating their entreprenuerial spirit and seeking to partner with them to meet common challenges, there have been times where America has shown arrogance and been dismissive, even derisive.
Some of us wonder if our current Overseas Contingency Operation would even be needed had the last administration not been so quick to label Pirates as "thieves," "terrorists" and worse. Such swashbucklaphobia can lead to tragic results, as we have seen this week.”
I called the last week the "Obama Apology Tour." Caroline Glick thinks it was more of an Obama Appeasement Tour:
AMERICA'S BETRAYAL of its democratic allies makes each of them more vulnerable to aggression at the hands of their enemies - enemies the Obama administration is now actively attempting to appease. And as the US strengthens their adversaries at their expense, these spurned democracies must consider their options for surviving as free societies in this new, threatening, post-American environment...
If they do so successfully, then the damage to global security induced by Obama's emasculation of his country will be limited. If on the other hand, they fail, then America's eventual return to its senses will likely come too late for its allies - if not for America itself.
As I said the other day, this presidency has the makings of global tragedy. To modify a Bernard Lewis line, Obama's speeches risk giving the impression that America is "harmless as an enemy and treacherous as a friend." That's not a good message to send the world.
“In a world of legalisms, resistance is futile. The Royal Navy sailors kidnapped by Iran two years ago and humiliated by the mullahs on TV were operating under rules of engagement that call for "de-escalation" in the event of a confrontation. Which is to say their rules of engagement are rules of nonengagement. Likewise, merchant vessels equipped with cannon in the 18th century now sail unarmed. They contract with expensive private security firms, but those security teams do not carry guns:
When the MV Biscaglia was seized by pirates in the Gulf of Aden last year, the Indian and Bangladeshi crew were taken hostage but the three unarmed guards from "Anti-Piracy Maritime Security Solutions" in London "escaped by jumping into the water." Some solution. When you make a lucrative activity low-risk, you get more of it.
As my colleague Andrew McCarthy wrote, "Civilization is not an evolution of mankind but the imposition of human good on human evil. It is not a historical inevitability. It is a battle that has to be fought every day, because evil doesn't recede willingly before the wheels of progress." Very true. Somalia, Iran and North Korea are all less "civilized" than they were a couple of generations ago.
And yet in one sense they have made undeniable progress: They have globalized their pathologies. Somali pirates seize vessels the size of aircraft carriers flying the ensigns of the great powers. Iranian proxies run Gaza and much of Lebanon. North Korea's impoverished prison state provides nuclear technology to Damascus and Tehran. Unlovely as it is, Pyongyang nevertheless has friends on the Security Council. Powerful states protect one-man psycho states.
One-man psycho states provide delivery systems to apocalyptic ideological states. Apocalyptic ideological states fund nonstate actors around the world. And in Somalia and elsewhere nonstate actors are constrained only by their ever increasing capabilities.
When all the world's a "distraction," maybe you're not the main event after all. Most wealthy nations lack the means to defend themselves. Those few that do, lack the will. Meanwhile, basket-case jurisdictions send out ever bolder freelance marauders to prey on the civilized world with impunity. Don't be surprised if "the civilized world" shrivels and retreats in the face of state-of-the-art reprimitivization. From piracy to nukes to the limp response of the hyperpower, this is not a "distraction" but a portent of the future.”
“According to a source within the administration, she reportedly received death threats after this story hit national news on Thursday. An ASU spokesperson said they started receiving hate-email within minutes after the story was published on Huffington Post. Crow's office was barraged with so many calls that many went straight to voice mail.
Everyone wants to know... why not grant a meaningless, honorific degree to the first African American president of the United States?"
Obama addresses Planned Parenthood.Colonel Neville: Hey, check out margaretsanger blogspot com. Marge is a Nazi KKK pal scumbag nihilist racist. No really. That's why she's a left liberal heroine.
Saul Alinsky helped to establish the confrontational political tactics that characterized the 1960s and have remained central to all subsequent revolutionary movements in the United States. Obama never met Alinsky personally; the latter died when Obama was a young boy. But Obama was trained by the Alinsky-founded Industrial Areas Foundation (IAF) in Chicago and worked for an affiliate of the Gamaliel Foundation, whose modus operandi for the creation of “a more just and democratic society” is rooted firmly in the Alinsky method.
In the Alinsky model, "organizing" is a euphemism for "revolution" -- a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America's social and economic structure. The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted -- a revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and wholly unworthy of salvation.
Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle for nothing less than that status quo's complete collapse -- to be followed by the erection of an entirely new system upon its ruins. Toward that end, they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly understand what types of societal "changes" are needed.
But Alinsky's brand of revolution was not characterized by dramatic, sweeping, overnight transformations of social institutions. As Richard Poe puts it, "Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process. The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties." Alinsky advised organizers and their disciples to quietly, subtly gain influence within the decision-making ranks of these institutions, and to introduce changes from that platform.
For several years Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method.”
Along with his wife Bernardine Dohrn, Bill Ayers was a 1960s leader of the homegrown terrorist group Weatherman, a Communist-driven splinter faction of Students for a Democratic Society."
Characterizing Weatherman as "an American Red Army," Ayers summed up the organization's ideology as follows: "Kill all the rich people. Break up their cars and apartments. Bring the revolution home, Kill your parents."
In his 2001 screed Fugitive Days, Ayers boasts that he "participated in the bombings of New York City Police Headquarters in 1970, of the Capitol building in 1971, and the Pentagon in 1972." All told, Ayers and Weatherman were responsible for some 30 bombings aimed at destroying the defense and security infrastructures of the United States. "I don't regret setting bombs, said Ayers in 2001, "I feel we didn't do enough." In Fugitive Days, Ayers reflects on whether or not he might use bombs against the U.S. in the future: "I can't imagine entirely dismissing the possibility," he writes.
Today Ayers is a professor of education and a Senior University Scholar at the University of Illinois.
In the mid-1990s, Ayers and Dohrn hosted meetings at their Chicago home to introduce Barack Obama to their neighbors during his first run for the Illinois Senate. Ayers also contributed money to Obama’s 1996 Senate campaign.
In 1995 Obama was appointed as the first Chairman of the Chicago Annenberg Challenge (CAC), a “school reform organization” founded by Ayers, who would later write, in his book Teaching Toward Freedom, that his educational objective was to “teach against oppression” as embodied in “America’s history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.”
When National Review Online writer Stanley Kurtz in 2008 asked the Obama presidential campaign about the nature of its candidate's connection to Ayers, the campaign issued a statement claiming that Ayers had not been involved in the “recruitment” of Obama to the CAC board in 1995. But when Kurtz reviewed the CAC archives at the Richard J. Daley Library at the University of Illinois at Chicago, he found that Ayers in fact had been one of five members of a working group that assembled the initial CAC board which hired Obama.
“Ayers founded CAC and was its guiding spirit,” Kurtz wrote in September 2008. “No one would have been appointed the CAC chairman without his approval.” According to Kurtz, the CAC archives show that Obama and Ayers worked as a team to advance the foundation's agenda -- with Obama responsible for fiscal matters while Ayers focused on shaping educational policy. The archived documents further reveal that Ayers served as an ex-officio member of the board that Obama chaired through CAC's first year; that Ayers served with Obama on the CAC governance committee; and that Ayers worked with Obama to write CAC’s bylaws.
A September 2008 WorldNetDaily report offers still more details: “Ayers made presentations to board meetings chaired by Obama. Ayers also spoke for the Chicago School Reform Collaborative before Obama's board, while Obama periodically spoke for the board at meetings of the collaborative … According to the documents, the CAC granted money to far-leftist causes, such as the radical Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, or ACORN, which …has done work on behalf of Obama's presidential campaign.”
WorldNetDaily reported further that “while Obama chaired the board of the CAC, more than $600,000 was granted to an organization founded by Ayers and run by Mike Klonsky, a former top communist activist. Klonsky was leader of the Marxist-Leninist Communist Party, which was effectively recognized by China as the all-but-official U.S. Maoist party.”
In 1999 Ayers joined the Woods Fund of Chicago, where he served as a director alongside Barack Obama until the latter left the Woods board in December 2002. In 2002 (while Obama was still on the board), the Woods Fund made a grant to Northwestern University Law School's Children and Family Justice Center, where Ayers' wife, Bernardine Dohrn, was employed.
At a 2007 reunion of former members of the Weather Underground and Students for a Democratic Society, Ayerscomplained about “a kind of rising incipient American form of fascism,” and about America’s “jingoistic patriotism, unprecedented and unapologetic military expansion, white supremacy … attacks on women and girls, violent attacks, growing surveillance in every sphere of our lives … the targeting of gay and lesbian people …”
In 2008 the Obama campaign produced a “fact sheet” pronouncing Ayers and Dohrn to be "respectable" members of the "mainstream" community."
The current favourite person for the left liberal to to uber-lie about, and all with zero supporting evidence, Rush Limbaugh:
“Simon Koschut of the German Council on Foreign Relations, 'Merkel is not a huge fan of Obama. She is skeptical not only of his policies, but she is skeptical of his whole personality.'" That was the backdrop for their joint press conference that took place.
“So the myth continues. The world hated Bush; the world loves Obama; now the world loves the United States. If the world loves the United States, the G20 loved the United States, it's 'cause the United States has decided to stop being who we have always been. Barack Obama wants to turn the United States into something similar to a Western European socialist democracy.
The next story I found interesting, also from the Associated Press: "Welcomed with thunderous cheers, President Barack Obama pledged on Friday to repair damaged relations with Europe, saying the world came together following the 2001 terrorist attacks but then 'we got sidetracked by Iraq.'"
We were all kumbaya, we were all happy, we were all hunky-dory, we were one world. And then Bush, Bush, Bush made us hated around the world 'cause he went into Iraq. Obama said, "We must be honest with ourselves," Obama said. "In recent years, we've allowed our alliance to drift. ... We got sidetracked by Iraq and we have not fully recovered that initial insight that we have a mutual interest in ensuring that organizations like al-Qaida cannot operate.
I think it is important for Europe to understand that even though I am president and George Bush is not president, al-Qaida is still a threat."
I cannot tell you how this makes the blood boil. Feed the hatred of George W. Bush but then don't change the policy? Ramp up the policy in Afghanistan all the while pledging to repair US relations with Europe? How do you do that?
You go over there and you bow down to the king of Saudi Arabia, you go over there, and you say, "Yep, we're to blame, I agree with you. United States is the problem, and we're going to fix it." That's how you do it.
You go to the ChiComs and say, "Hey, look we're going to get rid of our nukes," and you go to Medvedev, "Hey, we'll get rid of our nukes, hey, we're going to totally nuclear disarm," and the audiences applaud and the ChiComs and the Russians, "Can we be this lucky? Can we be this lucky?
The American people elected this dunce? All we gotta do is pretend we're going along with this?"
These guys have figured out all they have to do is act like they are enthralled with this guy, all they've gotta do is do that and the American people will think Obama's working miracles while he dismantles the United States of America, and these guys sit around and laugh behind closed doors all the while in public, except for Merkel, they make it look like they are just as big rock star fans as many Americans.
(a) DESIGNATION.—The Department of Commerce shall serve as the clearinghouse of cybersecurity threat and vulnerability information to Federal government and private sector owned critical infrastructure information systems and networks.
(b) FUNCTIONS.—The Secretary of Commerce— (1) shall have access to all relevant data concerning such networks without regard to any provision of law, regulation, rule, or policy restricting such access; …
SEC. 18. CYBERSECURITY RESPONSIBILITIES AND AUTHORITY.
The President—... (2) may declare a cybersecurity emergency and order the limitation or shutdown of Internet traffic to and from any compromised Federal government or United States critical infrastructure information system or network;
“The New York Times sharply criticized Bill Clinton for a mere inclination of his shoulders towards Japanese Emperor Akihito in 1994:
It wasn’t a bow, exactly. But Mr. Clinton came close. He inclined his head and shoulders forward, he pressed his hands together. It lasted no longer than a snapshot, but the image on the South Lawn was indelible: an obsequent President, and the Emperor of Japan.
Canadians still bow to England’s Queen; so do Australians. Americans shake hands. If not to stand eye-to-eye with royalty, what else were 1776 and all that about?...
Guests invited to a white-tie state dinner at the White House (a Clinton Administration first) were instructed to address the Emperor as “Your Majesty,” not “Your Highness” or, worse, “King.” And in what one Administration aide called “some emperor thing,” an Army general was cautioned that he should not address the Emperor Akihito at all as he escorted him to the Tomb of the Unknowns at Arlington National Cemetery.
But the “thou need not bow” commandment from the State Department’s protocol office maintained a constancy of more than 200 years. Administration officials scurried to insist that the eager-to-please President had not really done the unthinkable.”
Barrack Barry Hussein Sotoero Obama is shown here in a rare fit of political rage being restrained by his advisers, as he tries to kill off his white half completely. Barry was heard to shout " Die white boy! I don't need you anymore!"
Dear sports, here's a slightly modified rant from Tuesday 05 February 2008. [There's 12 comments at the original posting.] My how I've changed. Now I'm really repelled and creeped out by Obama! Wah hey!
“Fascism was the shadow or the ugly child of Communism. As Fascism sprang from Communism, so Nazism developed from Fascism. Thus was set on foot those kindred movements that were destined soon to plunge the world into even more hideous strife, which none can say has ended with their destruction”Winston Churchill.
A commenter on a blog I have been unable to backtrack, referred to Obama as “The Manchurian Candidate!” He is of course almost entirely, except his acting is less convincing, and his goals are slightly different, but just as er, unfortunate. Yep, at heart, left liberals are essentially Socialist control freak, totalitarian Fascist's who believe in big government and state power to control ever more individual freedoms, but not theirs.
“What? Me a son of a Muslim, a life-time Marxist and Socialist and a friend of the racist bigot Rev Wright and Muslim circus geek Farrakhan/a pal of Bill Ayers the Marxist terrorist radical/pal of PLO terrorist pressman Rashid Khalidi/pal of jailed criminal Syrian nationalist Tony baloney Rezko/an ACORN lawyer/a teen protege of Marxist pervert druggo Frank Marshall Davis/a student of Saul Alinsky/ with personal political support from me for my cousin Odinga, the Muslim murdering dictator of Kenya etc, etc?
Even a little? Na... No. Never. Not a bit. I split that Muslim scene, man. It was a real drag. A definite bummer and it was bringing me down”.
Ignore that having a Muslim Father makes one a Muslim or reciting the Koran means you accept Mohammad and Islam etc.
Hey, now that must be some of that “change”, that ‘Flashbacks’ Obama just loves to spout. Obama’s real name is not Barrack but er, Barry! Among others.
Amazingly, the Big O is perhaps the first public Muslim Apostate not sentenced to death for leaving ‘The Religion of Peace, or else!’ Nope, no Islamic extremism in any Indonesian religious schools he went to apparently. Check. It was maybe entirely dull.
An oxymoron I believe, can be defined by the word Islamic being linked with school. Imagine if you will, spending any formative years in a ‘society’ that allows gangs of Muslims to carry the severed heads of Christians around the streets, all watched by the local ‘Police?’
“I went to the mall and they were giving free ice cream to celebrate the death of another Infidel!”
“Hey, Obama, I didn’t see you at the Peninsula Club, but didn’t I see someone that looked a lot like you, applauding at the Louis Farrakhan Nation of Idiots for Islam Jew Hatefest?” Thurston Howell the III.
What’s really hilarious about Obama is that he’s no more black than he’s white and both mean almost entirely nothing. Or do they? Tah dah! His Mother was white and his Father was black. I hate to spoil the “Racist!” shouters dreams, but there is entirely no such thing as race, sports. There are only gradients that show us all as irrevocably connected by our shared genetics. I'm just glad we don't have to all share the same apartment.
But Obama is such a do anything for power phony baloney, that while his whole fake apparent posture is that only creeps care about “race”, almost his whole actual angle is about the tedious irrelevant drivel of race. His fraudulent self scribbled book is based exactly on such blarney in which he manipulates and lies selectively about his past to project just the right amount of PC crapola to win the deluded hang wringing votes of the self-loathing.
For example, in the Medium Sized O's wee autobiography, apparently Indonesia is painted as quite the land of tolerance and glee, and Hawaii, where he also spent time, is shown as just above Dixie, circa 1850. In the real world, the exact opposite is true.
He’s pulling this classic straw man stunt to avoid talking about his entirely non-existent policies and his virtually unknown, unexplored and unspoken past. Add his air built qualifications for the position of President.
Ah, but the drivel of colour is a back-dated red herring, innit? Just ask Allen West, Michael Steele, Condie Rice, Colin Powell etc. Now culture, background, character, personality, history, attitude, education, skills, qualifications and religion, do usually matter.
Now the Clinton's are white, whiter than Whitewater! Fat lot of good that has been. Nope, I'm afraid voting for folks because of their tan or lack of it, is nonsense. You may as well have high hopes for a guy who happens to be plaid.
So anyway, Barack just happen’s to want to be seen as black. Big 'effing deal. He just as easily could have chosen white, brown or none of the above. Why black exactly? Just because he looks kinda more black to the racially unfamiliar? Cos white would be uncool and racist, silly! Everyone knows that. Hadeehardar.
My wife is Japanese so our son looks pretty much like her, but he is neither Japanese nor Asian. He’s Australian, because this is where he was born and where he is growing up.
Obama plays the black candidate meme cos it works as it always has. The entire opposite of what the crushing boredom and fraud of grievance politics allege.
Obama chose Barack instead of er, Barry, and who wouldn't? Barry just doesn't have the same exotic cache and edge of Barack. Barack snaps to where as Barry, well, it's one of those names, eh?
Nope, so Obama is black! Well, that's settled then. Ok, I’m Welsh! How hip and er, politically expedient. He knows precisely that in today’s PC auto idiocy, being black is not a hindrance. Nope, just having no sane non-Socialist bankruptcy policies may be a bad idea. Maybe not. Just ask what’s beyond Super Control Freak Hillary come in here dear Bill, have a cigar Clinton. Just bog standard liberal fascist utopianism and incompetence, but more so.
That’s why Obama talks about colour so bleedin' much, because it shouldn’t be an issue! Er, it ain’t and he knows it, thus it’s an entirely convenient diversion of no consequence, for his virtually empty campaign platform. Obama adopts a permanently faux ‘offended’ stance regards non-existent racial attacks regards his non-existent ‘race’. Obama is merely an American. Apparently this is too dull, ordinary and pedestrian for Mr choose your most disingenuously and useful persona.
Do you know there is more variation within an alleged "race" than between the "races?" It's mostly I'm afraid, disingenuous and irrelevant baloney. It's where and how you grow up more than anything, kids. Thus the children of immigrants can often feel their own parent's are from just left of Asteroid TZ92/B.
“Once you have the right to no longer be offended, you no longer have any other rights. Freedom is offensive”.Mark Steyn.
Allegedly “Racist!” Louisiana via New Orleans voted in a black Mayor, the venal, incompetent, corrupt, stupid and blame shifting idiot Ray "What should I do, Mother?" Nagin. The man who let 200 evacuation buses sit in mud.
The state that let environmentalists stop the Corp of Army Engineers reinforce the levees several decades ago, and sighted this as a “victory for the environment”. It’s an absurd and disgusting slur that President Bush is somehow responsible when in the US Federal system, much like Australia; the states are independent of the Union for local decisions. Or would the Left be happy if Bush the “Fascist!” controlled the whole country, down to the local level of counties and councils?
Isn’t that the er, legendary secret Halliburton plan of many a conspiracy bore?” Or do liberal’s want this now? Schizo drivel mental back flips as usual, I’m afraid.
The whole Katrina and Mayor Ray Nagin thang exposes and describes the inherent hypocrisy of the PC. They imagine they're demanding autonomy and rights for blacks, but when it comes to black responsibility, the same boobs almost invariably negate it by showing how deep down, they don't really see blacks as responsible adults at all. Thus, nothing is Nagin's fault, even though he's in charge.
The same mentality will apply to Obama I believe, which will just be dandy. This is why few of the Left seem to ask what Obama stands for beyond being kind of er, black. Outside of Barry's crony beneficiaries all Obama fans have two odd things in common: they know nothing about Obama and they don't want to know.
They don't expect Obama to really have anything proven and practical to offer and are entirely happy with that. Paradoxically, strange and smug reflections of themselves as naturally morally superior is just fine.
“A Fascist is a Conservative who’s winning an argument with a [Left] Liberal”.Tom Paine at Shire Network News.
Barren Obama is the perfect, empty and mediocre cipher for the average white faux middle class rebel. “I’m voting for half a black man!”
Er, by default you’re voting for half a white man, for what it’s all worth to ya. Entirely nothing I’d say. Ask any sub Koskid to name one policy of their man in two tonetown and they can’t, I’ll wager. Aye, there’s the rub. Obama lacks the guff to even stand up to Hillary, AKA Bill in drag.
Now come on, if Obama is so crappy, wouldn’t the people notice? Nup. Not a lot of folks it appears either read books, journals, newspapers or use the Net for much beyond email, work, school or hobby specialties and porn. Many apparently get their imagined rebellion via passive consumption of the MSM and gossip. The Daily Show seems to fill many an intellectual teen gas tank to full. That’s the way it is.
If you can get to forty years old, you know and understand nothing if you think that the world’s foremost clinical narcissists Bill and Hillary are heroes to anyone or anything but their own ambition. If you can think that Che ‘the child killer’ Guevara was anything beyond a sadist, coward, narcissist and utter stupid failure and bum, then you are a profoundly, wilfully deluded and ignorant twerp.
And that’s the way it is, because it’s easy to believe such bunk when every fake non-conformist is "completely supported by the system they they despise". [Mark Steyn] Every brat lives in an imaginary Hell while living at home with free meals and laundry service, and millions transfer this drivel onto another authority figure or two and simply never grow up.
And Barry's not the only stand-in for Laurence Harvey’s gripping role in the movie of the same name. Hillary is the "for and against" and neither contortionist, or whatever it takes to get hold of “POWER!” Hillary is simply another brand of Manchurian Candidate bringing her own destructive and absurdly monstrous fascistic visions of a dream government state, that she'll never have to live in. The Clinton’s always just sit back in their own personal and eternal Hamptons enjoying the wholly unearned backwash of adulation from their "great works" which are exactly zero.
“Everything I have ever said is a lie, including that”.
It's informative that the newer and crap version of The Manchurian Candidate has been "updated" to standard conspiracy tripe. It replaced the actually plausible brainwashing by real Communist totalitarian regimes, with a juvenile Koskid fantasy of the entirely fictional Halliburton/Cheney one. Thus it bombed. Not enough twerps to sustain the required Grand Canyon sized suspension of disbelief, I'm afraid.
For dramatic fantasy to work, it must have some connection to reality. Screaming "9/11 was an inside job!" just won't cut it outside of Sunnyvale Sanatorium or MoveOn.
If you don’t believe in naturally occurring Manchurian Candidates living like termites in the Whitehouse, think Jimmy Carter, the world's first eunuch President. A man so diseased with leftardism and Jew hatred, that the US and the world are still paying for his policy of cultural and security suicide abasement.
“I believe the best policy in a dangerous and harshly real world is to perpetually show the weakling face of a grinning idiot hick, with the same level of serious spine, strength, courage and self belief as a lump of jello on a giant water slide”.Jimmy the farter Carter.
Hey, now Jimminy the cricket mind is using his same insect level of non-intellect to chirp endlessly about how the Jews and Israel are the problem. It's like he’s taken all the pamphlets ever handed out at every student union crisis meeting, paper mache'd them in a vitamiser, and squashed the entire content’s into his rattling brain cavity. Jimmy is a freaking dangerous imbecile who has amazingly learnt even less as his miserable lifetime has ambled on through his own personal Dog Patch of inbred ideology.
Obama riffs on meaningless platitudes of “change”. So, any change is great, eh? Well, I change my underwear everyday, so I’m obviously pro-change right there. Change your height? Maybe change the colour of your teeth to purple or change to talking backwards maybe? Obama is all for rhetoric actually, that’s all. You could just as easily say you’re all for changing from change to not changing because we want a change from so much change.
“We’re tired of the same sun up and down resulting in night time. We want change! We’re tired of eating well and sleeping regular hours! We ain’t gonna take it anymore! We want change!”
Obama is a classic Democrat of the kind with no real values that contradict the current Democrat orthodoxy as his values. So, zero values beyond the fashionably Socialist. What Obama is not interested in changing is his privileged, rich and elite position, the kind occupied by Hillary my balls itch Clinton, John love me, love my 1980’s hairstyle Edwards, John Viet Kong traitor franchise Kerry and Teddy let the bitch drown Kennedy ad nauseum.
Barry Obama is in short, full of crap. Black or otherwise, is not a qualification. But what is the real change that Barack "must kill the President!" "But I’m the President!"Obama?
Based on nothing more it seems, than having black Muslim not around bum Father and a weirdo atheist Marxist freak white Mother, and being a perfectly superficial race and other grievances Democrat.
Whatever he may say, Barack Obama does have some kind of semi-Muslim background over several years when he was six. Now he's a wacko brand of black militant influenced Christian and an in the past Muslim, if that's possible, who has wanted to be the President of the United States of America since he was a teen. And now he is.
Now that may just turn out to be some kind of real change right there. Oh it has? Carry on then.
"Get out of my damn toilet!" Colonel Neville in a Tokyo bathroom. How do you think I met my wife?
[Warning. Long post ahead! Great Frank Caliendo vids at the end. Phew!]
Now’s here’s a funny thing. Apparently I have flaws and even make mistakes! No, please. Sit down. It’s true.
I didn’t believe it at first. I mean, who would have thought? Not me, fellah. But apparently if we can just "nuance" totalitarian fascist Marxist Communism, it's gonna be wonderful. Er, no.
Curiously, while I do have limitations of judgement, I’ve not yet subscribed and cheered for any totalitarian ideology and over decades, while as Mark Steyn said “living in a fantasy life completely supported by the system I despise”. I never despised it!
And so far I’ve never hidden and lied about virtually everything and anything in order to be the elected President. Or have I?
Also I've never promoted my own mediocrity, incompetence and total lack of ability as a plus for the free world. Sure, I do like to kick cute puppies, but who doesn’t?
So dig. It may just be true that Frank Marshall Davis, the Communist beatnik pothead and jazz weirdo, who had semi-treasonous dreams and wrote semi-pervert novels and semi-sub-Kerouac beat poetry, [though not as sub as Kerouac himself did] may be one of the less hideous influences on Obama. Now think about that. Go figure?
Again, dig. Frank appeared to never suffer from any miserable and paranoid race grievance syndrome. Frank never threw farewell dinners for Islamist PLO pressmen anti-Semites. Frank made little money over his entire life. Frank didn’t read from cue cards. Frank didn’t lie about everything and get have a sycophantic and hagiographer MSM give him free blow jobs.
Frank was not messianically adored on a relentless, massive and bizarrely incurious level by more people than JFK, Ghandi, Hitler, Mao, Jesus and the Beatles combined and for no tangible or quantifiable reason whatsoever.
And most of all Frank never ran for President.
And the amazing thing is that personally, Frank may have been a blast to hang out with, even without the Colombian Gold. Where as to me, Barack Obama is a less than four year known presence.
Obama ALWAYS gives me the dread feeling of the literally bent, sinister, radical and cynical apparent male model who is presented as a merely well spoken and allegedly thin Saint.
Barack Obama is as horrible and un-redeeming as the armies of the night he has spent a lifetime vampiring with.
“Mark [Davis] said: Now if you would care to discuss the points I actually made, instead of refuting straw man points that I did NOT make (such as an "evil" AIM or "criminal mastermind" Kincaid), we can have a rational discussion! But I understand it might not be as much fun for you . . .
Colonel Neville: Er, mate, that’s humour. It’s all the rage in some parts. Go on, tell me joke. I could do with a laugh. Rational=humourless bore. Got it.
“...not as much fun”. Gee, somehow I bet it wouldn’t be. And as much fun as what exactly? Trapped in a HACU meeting with you, Frank and Obama? I couldn’t take the jazz cigarette smoke and the convoluted and multi layered whining. From either of us. Hey, I'm with you on the AIM thang.
Mark Davis: BTW: Remember that the NAACP falsehoods were just the tip of the AIM iceberg. I would like to disabuse you of the illusion that his Body of Lies could just be "innocent mistakes."
Colonel Neville: I can dig it and thanks. I could do with an abuse free day. Ok, so AIM blew it in more ways than one. But they are still only part wrong, as Frank was Frank and Obama is still Obama, only more so. Frank Marshall Davis, the "family friend" of Stanley Ann Dunham, Marxist atheist and non-diletante oddball Mother of Barack Hussein Obama.
But the tip of an iceberg? Really? Well, if we’re sailing into hackneyed waters, keep rearranging the deckchairs. Who knows how far the tentacles of AIM reach? I hear they’ve organised the waterfront and infiltrated the Pentagon. Oh sorry, I’ve got them confused with someone else. Ok. AIM are out to smear a Commie weirdo’s reputation. I get it.
Mark Davis: Don't get me wrong. He does his job rather well. It's tough being a professional prevaricator when your stock in trade is easily disprovable lies.
Colonel Neville: Then quit. Kinkaid is a Communist? I didn’t know.
Mark Davis: His disinformation campaign might have actually derailed the Obama campaign if voters were more gullible.
Colonel Neville: Er, excuse me. Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahah, ah hum. Ha! No.
The ENTIRE REASON why Obama’s campaign was NOT derailed is because many people ARE wilfully gullible. SO how much more? Jesus H. fucking monkey handles Christ! It reminds me of a variation on the vomit scene in Monty Python’s Meaning Of Life:
“Please Monsieur voh-tar! Jarst a tiny leetle beet more gullabillartee to swallow wun more sar-lice of HOPE arnd BARLEEV!”
Everyone Obama fan I have spoken to can’t tell me anything about him beyond that they like him and the usual mange and soap. Oh sorry, Change and Hope. I have a dictionary too and it’s filled with many fine words and phrases like chocolate pudding, linoleum, incurious hordes, mesmerised dupes, guilt ridden spastic, phony, acorn, weather and bullshit.
So Bill Ayers, Rashid Khalidi, Rev Wright, Farrakhan, Rezko, ACORN, Woods, the venal incompetent Michelle, Alinsky, Mansour, Odinga the mass murdering Muslim dictator of Kenya, B.O’s poverty stricken relatives, less days in the Senate than would qualify him to run a hospital or a McDonald’s, heavy drug use, a Marxist atheist family, a Muslim bum Father, a fake birth certificate, no medical records, personally locked down school records, Socialist policy’s...
Takes breath, phew!
...no depth, being virtually unknown before four years ago, being a profound part of the deeply corrupt world of Chicago politics, no experience outside of activism and the tax payer funded, writing a paranoid grievance opus, Che the child killer posters in his campaign volunteer office’s and so on ad nauseum, DIDN’T derail B.O for Prez, but YOU say AIM and Frank the empirically proven Commie beatnik and potheaded perve could have? Er, NO.
So could have, fucking should have really. A stripped down and accurate description of Obama is available in Australia at many a working class motorcycle repair shop and bar.
“He’s a lying corrupt rich Leftie elitist bastard”.
Of course I would never say it so politely. I’m afraid you’re going to have to use the totalitarian method to get many people to feel differently, and they still won’t. And again, there is NO comparison to any AIM triggered avalanche of deceit supported by a largely PC Leftard Liberal anti-Semitic media.
Here’s a nice aside on effective spreading of said "memes". Apparently the fraud that around “ten percent of people are gay” was traced back to a gay magazine circa 1974. They had zero basis for this as every government census before and since have clearly shown. But it’s now an often accepted and quoted figure. The true figure is from one and a half percent to no more than around two percent.
Thus even in the very gay area that I live in, the full ten percent gay quota remains unfilled, so to speak.
Another bunko meme is that FDR’s New Deal tax burden and money giveaway for useless mass behaviour programs lifted the US out of recession. It prolonged it, as only lowering the costs of doing business, and naturally occurring real demand makes an economy work. And lastly, the endless fraud of Che the child killer and avid sadist, narcissist, coward, phony and totalitarian dark dreamer, and that he was a hero of any people, outside of himself.
There’s plenty of ‘em. And that’s because they are made effective by the MSM, academia, celebrity, Hollywood and our own deluded authorities. Meaning that the mass of the MSM, education, even the government the the social all reinforce this crap.
Not really AIM's league, eh?
Junior: YOU WROTE: Hey, Marky Mark is conversely INCORRECT about...well, he says it best here: Jnr Marx: “...you are asking if anything about my father or President-Elect Obama strikes me as suspicious. No, because I believe I understand them”.
How does that work? Ain't this a Logical Fallacy of perception and effect? You understanding A does not and cannot change A at all, unless perceiving A changes you, and then you change A by doing um, something.
[Listens....] Not a sausage.
Or in Obama’s case, anything. Neither understanding, which the intelligent Mark admits to, or being wilfully oblivious of Barry and Frank renders their true natures above suspicion. The psychological term for such a line of unreasoned wishful thinking is "utter balls", from the Latin "E tu Balls?" To look at Barry Hussein and Frank and see nothing suspicious, is the kind of disingenuous raw power that could possibly power a small planet. Forget your dreams of being a Detective, sport.
Junior: RESPONSE: I understand “suspicious” to mean a slight trace, hint or suggestion of something. When you understand something, you move beyond the vague into the concrete. Comprehension replaces suspicion. I believe I understand their motives, and therefore do NOT consider them suspicious. For example, if I know my wife is meeting secretly with someone, then her activity may be suspicious. Once I understand the purpose of the meetings, it is no longer suspicious.
Colonel Neville: Listen, if you don’t bleeding know if you’re “wife is secretly meeting someone”, don’t complain to me. As Dudley Moore said, a dead give away would be if she came home “with her hair matted with cum”.
Now about the rest. Ah, I dig the Logical Fallacy, Okham’s razor, reason and False Argument scene and polka music as much as the next man, unless it’s you. But I’m a simple man and even a small man in many ways, but if you think you can go through life so er, sophisticated, you are deluded.
It is a variant of the European elitist disease I believe. [Mark Steyn on the smug conceits and snobbery of the highly professional mediocrity.]
They endlessly waffle about everything right up to usually ours but also their own execution. For such decadent, useless and ineffective geeks, the idea that a plain man of action and clear solid belief’s such as Reagan, who saved around 70 lives as a lifeguard, is gauche and beneath serious consideration as not just a President, but any position of power. No, serious minds and leaders study convoluted and constipated arts of discourse and utter corrupting failure at the Sorbonne, while admiring Castro and living in Bonne.
And the European is largely venal and ungrateful for their freedom and effete Socialist welfare states bankrolled by the military, moral and economic power and generosity of the US, the longest continuous Democracy in the world after Britain. Not a single European country has been a successful and continuous democracy for any more than the last 60 years. They are economically powerful and militarily impotent. Their power is non-existent and thus they have no reach. They are theorising in the abstract addicted idiots.
Sometimes simple and even crude spontaneity is called for, wouldn’t you agree? Like Freud said, sometimes a cigar is just a cigar and sometimes a turd pie is just a turd pie, no matter how faux reasoned and tolerant you imagine yourself to be in the circus of the allegedly balanced argument.
The difference between an intellectual and someone who takes effective action is that the intellectual is always right. As long as they never tell anyone and never do anything. Conversely, the person of action invariably sharpens their abilities and hit rate in a harsh and messy reality and by virtual default, unless of course they’re a stupid bunt.
I believe you are looking at the wrong end of the tree, old boy. Try the stripped down and grounded roots instead of the rather endless and exhaustively complicated branches.
What do I mean? One can babble on rationalising anything as long as you are not the one receiving the 400 blows. Communism, Obama-ism and the rest are pieces of shit and cannot be polished.
Junior: YOU WROTE: There is no AIM conspiracy, and if there was, that would make the MSM a 9 to the power of whatever conspiracy. The MSM is more a kind of phony, incompetent, group think, mediocre, dull, and censorious, failing, liar filled, idiot employing, boring, and irrelevant and an often crippling and stunted diversion. Sure, it has its bad side too. It's a largely self-regulating and agreed upon stupidity.
Colonel Neville: Excellent eh? Thanks.
Mark Davis: RESPONSE: If all of the AIM falsehoods were innocent mistakes, then they would randomly exaggerate and minimize my father’s radical background. Unfortunately for your theory, they all exaggerate his radical backgrounds. In addition to misrepresenting others’ statements, such as Edward Berman, some of them are absolute lies.
Colonel Neville: Fair enough and I award you a Kewpie Doll for that, but would they really? If AIM is crap, fuck ‘em off as a waste of time. Look, I have my own flaws, problems and crushing frustrations. But at least you can blog on the President’s official site, eh? For what it's worth.
And Frank was noted, liked and admired by many. It’s a shame they didn’t pay him properly, but they wouldn’t would they?
“When money talks, people listen”.Thurston Howell lll.
Look man, people write negative stuff about Picasso, Elvis, Mr Potato Head and Charles Manson. That’s celebrity. It is if anything, creepy, depressing and a laugh.
And I can dig how it is uncomfortable to have boobs get the nuance of you Pappy’s radicalism so wrong. That what I said about my Father. He may have been in the KKK, but he never followed the Grand Cyclops Line!
So stop crying like a big girls blouse and maybe promote Franks many wonderful achievements and not just the world class choofing and hot cracker banging. Or keep a low profile. Frank was a lauded writer, one of the first young black people to attend University freely and was apparently not an avaricious man. To be honest, I can see why a teenager would think Frank was hip. He was so hip it hurt.
Oh, and write about Obama’s achievement’s too. With a crayon and a single Post-it, you should be occupied for all of one minute.
Sappy Davis Junior: YOU WROTE: All that is cleansed into the Current Truth by focusing on errors and failings of a single website called AIM, about a single square song and dance attended by a bunch of boring Commies and the often very decent people of the NAACP. Tra la la.
RESPONSE: You will find that the vast majority of the thousands of negative references to my father can all be traced to AIM. In addition, the NAACP incident is only a small part of AIM’s Body of Lies. I thought you understood this point. Perhaps I should post more of their Specific Misrepresentations right here for your review.
Colonel Neville: Ok. So AIM is the only source of negative waves aimed at Frank Davis, eh? It is an outrage to be sure. The way AIM have twisted Frank’s underage porn novel, pot hedonism and Communism into something bad, is a disgrace. I’m alerting the Pope and the Daily Worker!
Mark Davis: But my posts are primarily about the lies regarding the Davis-Obama relationship,”
Colonel Neville: Kinkaid’s or Obama and Davis? Or the MSM or academia or the Democrats?
Junior: RESPONSE: The vast majority came from Kincaid’s AIM. I am unaware of any such lies from Obama, Davis, MSM, academia or the Democrats? Please enlighten me.
Colonel Neville: Ya shittin’ me right? Yes, anything negative about Frank the Redhead is a lie? Check. Got it. Nuance. Radicalism is soooooo misunderstood by the uptight squares man!
No lies from “Obama, Davis, MSM, academia or the Democrats?” To “enlighten” such a disingenuous or wilfully ignorant mentality would require the kind of wattage that no mere mortal can generate. It would be easier to write the few truth’s of this group on a table napkin than list the frauds in a telephone book sized notepad.
“Now listen to me. I’m gonna tell you. I never, ever had sexual relations with that woman. Never, ever etc, blah,blah woof, woof. Vote for mah wife!”Billoil.
“I’m a good swimmer, but I’ve always cared about those who can’t swim”.Democrat Senator Ted Kennedy.
“There are none as blind s those who don’t want to see”.Gideon’s Bible. [Top drawer]
Mark Davis: YOU WROTE: Can I ask your clear candid views, Mark? Say on either Frank, Obama, Communism, the Western Canon and Capitalist Democracy, free markets and innovation, truth, God, humour, the First, Second and Third Amendments, freedom and free speech, the MSM, academia, radicalism, maturity, principles and so on. If I know where you “stand and deliver” Mark, all the rest is rather moot to pointless, innit?
Junior: RESPONSE: If you read my blog, you would know how much I despise communism. I support the constitution, but I have neither the time nor the inclination to write about your other topics.
YOU WROTE: Big Lie? Wasn't he in Hawaii Five O? So there was some radicalism to "exaggerate" then? “His values, passed on to Obama, were those of a communist agent who pledged allegiance to Stalin.” Is this a direct quote? Of course not, “...it should still be plausible to those with the appropriate predisposition to believe. It should make sense to the casual observer”.
RESPONSE: Yes, his ideas were radical for the era. Civil rights was a radical concept back then, which is the reason that J Edgar Hoover targeted Martin Luther King Jr. as a “communist.” On the other hand, the quote IS a direct quote (from http://www.aim.org/aim-column/media-excuse-obamas-false-advertising). It is in the fourth paragraph down from the heading “Another Cover Up”:
Colonel Neville: Brush up on your “despising” credentials is all I can say, sport. Hoover? Now there's a can of worms. "Targeted" by Hoover could have all effect and power of a light hand vacuuming. Maybe even annoying and a little noisy, but largely ineffective, then what? Nothing mostly. MLK the Republican.
Junior: [QUOTE] In fact, his white grandfather helped raise Obama by selecting Frank Marshall Davis, a black communist writer and poet, as a father-figure and role model while he was growing up in Hawaii. His values, passed on to Obama, were those of a communist agent who pledged allegiance to Stalin. [END QUOTE]
Colonel Neville: Er, that’s only really in contention even according to you from “agent...” The rest is entirely correct. As I said, I don’t give a flying Marxist about the phony Quality Control of Communist gradients. Gosh, what was the good and worthy Communist douche bag dictator they were pledging to at the time?
These boobs were merely deluded and classic useful idiots. Now listen. From its core and outwards, Marxism is ALL pure shit.
Junior: YOU WROTE: Colonel Neville: Hmm. “Stalinist” is a phony tactic to make out that Stalin spoiled Marxism by falsely introducing totalitarian conformity via mass murder and propaganda. Er, that IS Marxist Communism. Stalin was NOT an anomaly of Communism, but the natural result of it. The only way to power in totalitarianism is through utterly ruthless last man standing tactics, behaviour and strategy. There is no false “meme” here.
RESPONSE: There are many other types of communists than Stalinists. Kincaid’s expert, Edgar Tidwell, dismisses the Stalinist claim. It is a false meme unless you contend that all communists are Stalinists. Is THAT your position? Even Kincaid does not make such an absurd claim! Were Trotsky, Lenin, Gorby and Yeltsin “Stalinist”? Is the PRC today “Stalinist”?
Colonel Neville: Who you jiving with this cosmic debris?
Trotsky was a boring fellow travelling fool who thought there was he was aware of a decent collectivism to be found somewhere, perhaps up his own ass? Lenin was a mass murdering nihilist totalitarian madman who never gave a damn about human life. He ended his days as a demented circus freak in a cane bath chair. Gorby was another idiot who could neither understand the past, the present or the future, and was at core another of these “I’m sure there’s some nice Communism somewhere!”
Yeltsin the semi-man of the people and doomed semi-clown drunk. At least Yeltsin like people, whereas Putin does not, except as a means to an end. Sadly, as Vlad the not so ex-KGB overlord builds his fiefdom via total media control and the power of primary resources etc, Russia collapses ever more via a 500,000 head of local population loss a year.
So no, really. Mere variations on a very narrow theme of gosh, totalitarianism which is Communism and which naturally gives you Stalin etc, or similar progeny. Ps. Are you kidding me?
Junior: As posted on my blog, Kincaid said my father was a “Stalinist,” because “He stayed with the Communist Party even after the Hitler-Stalin pact. That's why I refer to him as `a Stalinist agent.’ In reality, Davis could not have “stayed with” the party after the pact when he was not even a member of the party before WWII.
Also: Perhaps you did not pay attention when I wrote that he did not believe in collectivism. He, like many others, joined the party for other reasons. Must I repeat it yet again? He was a capitalist. He owned his own businesses in Hawaii”.
Colonel Neville: A capitalist, eh? Great. It warms my heart. Stay with "the party", don’t stay with the fucking party? Again, I don’t give a shit about brands. It all comes down to being a useful idiot to the East and a useless idiot to the free West.
And neither does being a successful capitalist inure one from being a hypocrite, an idiot and a creep. Witness Soros as he finances the demise of the Republic with fashionable treason and chicanery, and much of Hollywood as they hang with Fidel and Chavez et al. Read Humberto Fontova’s The Real Che and the Idiots Who Idolize Him, Jonah Goldberg’s [Left] Liberal Fascism and Nick Cohen’s What’s Left etc, just for laughs. It was ever thus.
Junior: YOU WROTE: Hey, Marky Mark is conversely INCORRECT about...well, he says it best here: Jnr Marx: “...you are asking if anything about my father or President-Elect Obama strikes me as suspicious. No, because I believe I understand them”.
How does that work? Ain't this a Logical Fallacy of perception and effect? You understanding A does not and cannot change A at all, unless perceiving A changes you, and then you change A by doing um, something.
[Listens....] Not a sausage.
Or in Obama’s case, anything. Neither understanding, which the intelligent Mark admits to, or being wilfully oblivious of Barry and Frank renders their true natures above suspicion. The psychological term for such a line of unreasoned wishful thinking is "utter balls", from the Latin "E tu Balls?" To look at Barry Hussein and Frank and see nothing suspicious, is the kind of disingenuous raw power that could possibly power a small planet. Forget your dreams of being a Detective, sport.
Junior: RESPONSE: I understand “suspicious” to mean a slight trace, hint or suggestion of something. When you understand something, you move beyond the vague into the concrete. Comprehension replaces suspicion. I believe I understand their motives, and therefore do NOT consider them suspicious. For example, if I know my wife is meeting secretly with someone, then her activity may be suspicious. Once I understand the purpose of the meetings, it is no longer suspicious”.
Colonel Neville: How very convenient for yoo. I remember when I accidentally joined the KKK, the Wermacht, the SS, the Baader Meinhoff Gang and a crack head gang all in one day.
After a few months I “understood” them all, and like you I never felt suspicious again. Even when they came to meetings covered in blood I’d say “Never mind me! I don’t have a suspicious bone in my body!”
Junior: YOU WROTE: There is no AIM conspiracy, and if there was, that would make the MSM a 9 to the power of whatever conspiracy. The MSM is more a kind of phony, incompetent, groupthink, mediocre, dull, and censorious, failing, liar filled, idiot employing, boring, and irrelevant and an often crippling and stunted diversion. Sure, it has its bad side too. It's a largely self-regulating and agreed upon stupidity.
RESPONSE: If all of the AIM falsehoods were innocent mistakes, then they would randomly exaggerate and minimize my father’s radical background. Unfortunately for your theory, they all exaggerate his radical background. In addition to misrepresenting others’ statements, such as Edward Berman, some of them are absolute lies.
Colonel Neville: Theory schmeory. Lies pies. When are you going to randomly start emphasising Frank’s non-radical er, background? Probably when you bloody find it, eh? Can’t wait. I sit with a non-Clintoned cigar and brandy, counting the seconds.
Junior: YOU WROTE: All that is cleansed into the Current Truth by focusing on errors and failings of a single website called AIM, about a single square song and dance attended by a bunch of boring Commies and the often very decent people of the NAACP. Tra la la.
RESPONSE: You will find that the vast majority of the thousands of negative references to my father can all be traced to AIM.
Colonel Neville: Did ANYTHING negative ever come from Pop? What a positive guy!
Junior: In addition, the NAACP incident is only a small part of AIM’s Body of Lies. I thought you understood this point. Perhaps I should post more of their Specific Misrepresentations right here for your review.
Colonel Neville:“Jan, Jan, Jan!”
As I said, we all have to harden the fuck up. I have to do that everyday with regards much of the MSM, the endless in your face of celebrities and their venal idiot opinions, that they have no intention of ever living, the endless parasitical reamers of academia, and our own clueless and two faced government. Welcome to the bloody club, mate. I admitted that AIM way suck for you. What do you want?
Junior: YOU WROTE: Mark Davis: But my posts are primarily about the lies regarding the Davis-Obama relationship,”
Colonel Neville: Kinkaid’s or Obama and Davis? Or the MSM or academia or the Democrats?
Junior: RESPONSE: The vast majority came from Kincaid’s AIM. I am unaware of any such lies from Obama, Davis, MSM, academia or the Democrats? Please enlighten me.
Colonel Neville: See, you have lost track that you already asked me that. Your post’s are largely about Frank and Obama apologia and blame shifting to anyone but them, while not conceding a single point. You are if anything, a consistent pest. And consistently you are surgically logical until you want to present Frank and Obama love or some other seemingly by the numbers radical Left Liberal canard and fraud.
“Every time I looked around, there he was that hairy hound, from Budapest! Never have I ever known a ruder pest!”Professor Higgins. My Fair Lady.
Junior: YOU WROTE: Can I ask your clear candid views, Mark? Say on either Frank, Obama, Communism, the Western Canon and Capitalist Democracy, free markets and innovation, truth, God, humour, the First, Second and Third Amendments, freedom and free speech, the MSM, academia, radicalism, maturity, principles and so on. If I know where you “stand and deliver” Mark, all the rest is rather moot to pointless, innit?
RESPONSE: If you read my blog, you would know how much I despise communism. I support the constitution, but I have neither the time nor the inclination to write about your other topics.
Colonel Neville: Too bad. Write one less comment. That should free up a week.
Junior: YOU WROTE: Colonel Neville: Big Lie? Wasn't he in Hawaii Five O? So there was some radicalism to "exaggerate" then? “His values, passed on to Obama, were those of a communist agent who pledged allegiance to Stalin.” Is this a direct quote? Of course not, “...it should still be plausible to those with the appropriate predisposition to believe. It should make sense to the casual observer”.
RESPONSE: Yes, his ideas were radical for the era. Civil rights was a radical concept back then, which is the reason that J Edgar Hoover targeted Martin Luther King Jr. as a “communist.” On the other hand, the quote IS a direct quote (from http://www.aim.org/aim-column/media-excuse-obamas-false-advertising). It is in the fourth paragraph down from the heading “Another Cover Up”:
Colonel Neville: Really? Yeah, now everyone is into Marxism, underage sex and drug use. Hey, they almost are! You’re right. Er, I thought the Democrats held back the civil rights movement, led by among others, Chuck Heston and Martin Luther King who were apparently BOTH Republican’s. And Democrat Senator Byrd, the happy KKK man voted against the civil rights act too, hmm?
Mark said... You seem to jump to conclusions rather often, Sir! To assume someone is a Stalinist by virtue of membership in a Communist Party is deductively invalid. It is a Fallacy of Hasty Generalization:
Colonel Neville: [Massive Logical Fallacy list deleted due to urge to ad hominem.]
Junior: Repeat: To assume someone is a Stalinist by virtue of membership in a Communist Party is deductively invalid. It is a Fallacy of Hasty Generalization. People often join organizations without internalizing their core ideology, from joining the YMCA to joining the Nazi Party, because membership has its privileges. While jumping to such conclusions is understandable, it is deductively invalid. When empirical evidence contradicts such conclusions, ignoring such evidence constitutes intellectual dishonesty.
Colonel Neville: Yes, “..the YMCA to joining the Nazi Party”. Quite. Who can tell the difference? They both involve people in showers. So nothing "deductively invalid" nor any "conclusions jumped" and humped, and no "intellectual dishonesty" at all then? Excellent.
“False Dichotomy for table 8! Here’s your hypocrisy, sir”.
Junior: Expert testimony from Edgar Tidwell concludes Frank Marshall Davis was not a Stalinist. He criticized Stalin by name and ran capitalist enterprises. Although he criticized the excesses of capitalism, none of his voluminous writing advocated the replacement of capitalism with collectivism, much less Stalinism.
Accuracy In Media's Cliff Kincaid appears to have originated the "Stalinist" viral rumour sometime between February and June 2008. In Kincaid's original (February 2008) attack against Davis (http://www.aim.org/aim-column/obamas-communist-mentor), he does NOT call Davis a "Stalinist." Kincaid reports that Davis joined the CPUSA during WWII, according to Edgar Tidwell, "an expert on the life and writings of Davis."
Colonel Neville: So AIM stink? Hey, when I was in the Wermacht, I never personally followed the “Hitlerist line” myself. In fact I don’t remember a single Nazi who did. We were all such carefree party dudes.
Junior: In June 2008, however, Kincaid starts the "Stalinist" falsehood (http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/opinion/s_571431.html). This is where Kincaid explains that he calls Davis a "Stalinist" because "he stayed with the CPUSA after the Hitler-Stalin pact" (1939).
This contradicts Kincaid's February 2008 column, which states Davis did not even JOIN the CPUSA until later. Obviously Davis could not have "stayed with" the CPUSA before he even joined the CPUSA. Obviously, Kincaid's stated reason is invalid. Obviously, something else changed between February and June 2008, when Kincaid suddenly starts calling Davis a "Stalinist." Davis suddenly became a "Stalinist" because Cliff Kincaid said so??
Colonel Neville: Ah, what can ya do? Poor Frank. You suck one Stalinist cock and they call you a Stalinist cock sucker for life! Ah, the “Stalinist falsehood”. Now ya got it. You just couldn’t get the good Communism at the time because of wartime shortages, right?
“You can’t get the wood mate!” The Goons.
Junior: Jumping to conclusions seems to be quite common in the fantasyland of the right-wing blogosphere. When asked to substantiate their conclusions, we may encounter bluster, red herrings, and ad hominem attacks more often than rational, focused answers. Military Intelligence students are quickly disabused of such behaviour, and learn the value of supporting every conclusion they proffer. Researchers at the Rand Corporation and other highly-regarded research institutions often come from such rigorous backgrounds, where conclusions are based on empirical evidence, rather than wishful thinking.
Colonel Neville:“Behavior” but not spelling, eh?
Yes, the "right-wing blogosphere" are sooo wrong about the evils of totalitarian Marxist Communism, Islamism, anti-Semitism, Left Liberalism, treason and ever bigger taxing and more control freakery government. Sure. And we’re so wrong about Capitalist Democracy via absolute free speech, the First and Second Amendment’s, the bedrock values of property rights, the rule of law, free markets and the rights of the individual over the mass as THE core value of freedom. Yeah, all fucked up eh?
And there is nothing negative worth considering about Obama, right? Go it.
"Look away childen! Look away!"
Junior: It's a pity that blogosphere researchers and commentators are not held to similar high standards of accuracy. It's a pity that their fans consider clearly documented misrepresentation to be insignificant as long as it confirms their biases.
It's a pity that such predisposition to believing disinformation can be exploited just as easily by Accuracy In Media (AIM) editor Cliff Kincaid as it was by the Bush administration in selling the Iraqi threat. Even today, when all of the false evidence supporting Iraqi WMD stockpiles has been clearly debunked, Bush loyalists may insist their conclusions were true despite the lack of evidence.
[Read more about jumping to conclusions in the right-wing fantasyland at http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/post/Kaleokualoha/gG59cf#extended]
Colonel Neville: It’s a shame you ain’t deliberately funny.
The lone Bush conspiracy is utter balls sans motive. And the presence of an actual pivotal enemy is always invisible to the Left Liberal. They can only see imaginary one's and only have the jelly spine to face off someone who has zero chance of responding to them. Thus they deem themselves "daring" rebels.
Thus George Clooney the talented and handsome clod, says "we took a chance" against 95 year old ex-HUAC members in Zimmer frames by making an empirically bogus movie, Goodnight And Good Luck.
The Left Liberal loves the UN but not George Bush, if George actually enforces the UN's 17 resolutions. The Left scream "fascist!" at Bush and anyone who disagrees with them, but never at any actual fascists.
The Left wish to live in a priveleged fantasy life but wilflly refuse to recognise their own mortal enemies and are incapable of defending their negotiable and fashionnable non-values. Etc, etc, etc.
Er, AIM’s minority flaws don't extrapolate to the vast empirical truth of the er, Conservative Libertarian and combinations there of blogosphere.
Your almost half-way decent writing, that alarmingly turns into effete Liberal hyperbole, has no effect at all on the superiority to you of fabbo and fun people like P.J O’Rourke, Tim Blair, Daniel Pipes, Robert Spencer, Mark Steyn, David Horowitz, Jonah Goldberg, Bruce Bawer, Brigette Gabriel, Roger Kimball, Penn and Teller, Dr Sanity blogspot, the people’s cube, Humberto Fontova, Norman Podhoretz, Dissectleft blogspot, aJacksonian blogspot, machosauce on YouTube, Andrew Bolt and Hotair and many, many, many more.
On the Left, it can seem that apart from folks like Nick Cohen et al, there are little to no publically well known equivalents to the empirical and moral quality of these people.
Outside of the Euston Manifesto adherents and so on, there are so few Left Liberal sites or writers that are not doomed by their own innate predisposition to the treasonous, to ideological canards, doctrinaire hysteria and spineless cant, that I can barely stay awake to even consider neglecting them. No, really. What do I know? Plenty!
My advice? Don't be a Commie, a Nazi or an Islamist loon. They often hurt and murder people.
And oh the irony of when the Left is attacked by reals fascists, as Harry’s Place was by UK Islamist geeks.
It’s your “fantasy land” of the right wing blogosphere that rushes to support them, and NOT really the Left at all.
Why? Because they have no real and proven core values that are not merely fashionable and entirely up for grabs. And therefore the Left do not generally put their beliefs into effective action because they cannot, and never as much as they get others to bear the cost and burden of their unproven abstractions and theory’s.
Maybe that’s why they never really seem to get that sharp or funny whenever gagging outside their often seemingly limited specialty, eh? Can Robin Williams, [who I often do genuinely enjoy] ever talk as an adult without the natural bent paradigm of a very talented, rich, privileged, dope headed, irresponsible, annoying one track Hollywood comic about say, George Bush? No. And most of the MSM et al are entirely comfortable with Robin Williams tiresome done to death tangent fantasies.
