I Had a Spare Afternoon So I Called Up the Laughable National Security Hotline and ASIO.

Pictured are three of the gals I spoke to at the National Security Hotline and ASIO, and the P.A for the Attorney General. They're in deep conference about who these mysterious "terrorists" could be. And getting their nails done. "Terrorists? Whatever! Like, der!"



Request of the week from Thursday 19 February 2009.

No really. I did call the whip crack smart super security portals and departments in charge of our er, security against our mortal enemy, [as yet un-named]. Dig my recent Fisk on the real life parody that is the National Security website. Enjoy your tax dollars and naive trust in our boob laden authorities at work. But then, they do allow hijab wearing Muslims to er, "man" the x-ray and security pantomime at our airports against terrorist who are 95 to 100 percent, wait for it, Muslims. And then there's Dubai Ports and Etihad Qantas etc, etc, etc... Who are we to judge, eh. Especially stealth jihad.

By "whip crack smart" I mean a beyond belief parody of PC'ism, the disingenuous, the incompetent, the stupid and the skirting of treason by manipulating and omitting harsh facts that put Australia and its people at grave and serious risk. And oh yes, threatening the average citizen with bankrupt laws, if they dare to not play the game and point out the bleeding obvious to the overpaid and unreachable.

So oatmeal sharp really. In short, our major security services are apparently some kind of absurd and profoundly disturbing joke. A gravediggers joke. So keep laughing if you can or call ASIO. Be polite and expect nothing and you'll never be disappointed. The National Security Hotline is waiting for your call, unless it's lunch. Ask for Sir Arthur Streebgreebling. No, not really but you may as well be asking for a pizza delivery or that great new melon peeler you saw advertised.

I said to the little dears that I had hoped that ASIO was better than their reputation, but my hopes were sadly crushed and without ceremony. Now nowhere on the NS website do they mention who the terrorists are, either by name, profile, what drives them, where they are likely to be from, what their goals are and so on ad nauseum.

Now, they were nice enough people for what nice is worth, which ain't much in fact it's nothing security-wise. Though they were snooty, rather unnatural and not straight speaking whatsoever and all but useless. And all but one hung up on me when I asked the utterly basic question "Can you tell me who these terrorists are?" The Attorney Generals Personal Assistant[!] said and I quote as best I can remember, "I can't do that". Why not exactly? Then resign, dear boob.

Colonel Neville: "So you're from National Security and you cannot tell me who these terrorists are but you expect the average citizen to identify them for you and let you know?"

PA: "I'm not prepared to continue this conversation..." [How convenient and ridiculous.]

Colonel Neville: "Then that makes you incompetent or dishonest".

Sound of hung up phone. "Brrrrrrr". Oooh, sooooo chilly!

The first dame I contacted reminded me of the lovely kind ladies who worked at the school canteen when I was a kid. Sadly, dealing in donuts, candy, small change and small children is not my idea of counter-terrorism training. But then in Australia, alleged "counter terrorism" university departments are almost invariably run by Muslim apologists cum taquiyaa pushers and Marxist cum leftist academics. And thus they "advise" our military and government...how to lose. Go figure.

Hell, just trying to get through on the phone was bad enough. When I called the NS and ASIO, the phones kept dropping out and I also got a technical feed recording, then someone else answered then it dropped out again and then I could hear the office background noise! No, seriously. Being a sarcastic satirical kinda guy, I asked them all about the "mysterious terrorists" and how I have a list, and if they could just help me eliminate some of the suspects, I may be able to narrow it down to who they are most likely to be. The terrorists that is.

"Could they be Hawaiian Taoists?" I asked cheerily. "Japanese salary men? Welsh pensioners? Taiwanese motorcycle cops? Red haired kilt wearing Scotsmen? Catholic nuns? Stamp collecting dentists from Pago Pago? Grid iron pros from the Bronx? Italian dairy farmers from Wonthaggi?"

Nope, apparently they couldn't say one way or another. No, really. What I can say for sure, is that these people appear to me to be PC infected idiots who will endanger and ultimately kill us all. No, really. I asked many questions and not one of them could give me a single straight answer on anything except yes, they were the main citizen portal for terrorism unpleasantness. Though this is of course entirely problematic. Professional government twerps do love that inhuman death sentence speak, don't they? You know, the junk that sounds almost polite to the ignorant but is cynical, entirely phony and profoundly insulting to real people.

Colonel Neville: "At the absolute basic, would you say that the NS and ASIO are the main and only places for citizens concerned about terror to go to?"

"Yes". Ok, they answered that one straight as I said but to no avail.

Colonel Neville: "So how can the major portal not name the enemy and be regarded as serious and effective?" No answer beyond rather identical diversions. "I can't say...I'm not prepared to...if you have a specific concern...send in a report..."

Yeah, maybe I should take up tennis or waste a day sending a missive that disappears into the bowels of bureaucracy, is dismissed or at best get me a nice form letter. Or I get arrested for looking into terrorism seriously for over eight years and noticing gee, that it does indeed connect with a very particular religion. Guess which one and win a prize! Yeah, a fucking brain!

I asked if an actual citizen can actually ever get to meet one on one say, any of the faceless drones of the alleged security apparatus? Nope. No dice. Not for the plebs. Simply not done, old boy. All hush hush. Mum's the word. Fall of Singapore and all that. They just accept "reports". Quite. Well, accept one up your nose with a garden hose then.

I could kinda tell that they may never have had ANYONE, ever call their bluff and say gee, is this a joke, are you crap and it's not all a parody, right? Guess not. I had a rather strong feeling too, that they were suppers upon the tit of The Idiot Age newspaper, the ABC and so on. No, really. All the dreary and miserable ineffective fantasy boxes were being ticked off as they driveled in faux response. They said send in any suspicions. All righty then. I will. Yes I said, here's a few.

That on your entire site you never mention the enemy by name. And yet you mysteriously state later that any connecting of terror with any religion is false, wrong and against the law. Gee, who mentioned religion? You did! Coincidence right? Arrest yourself.

By default, any citizen that studies terror seriously using any of the many major best selling books, journals, papers and websites both official, media and private supplying a profound empirical evidential Himalaya on the subject of golly, terror, would have to arrest themselves for noting the bleeding obvious. Gee, suspicious? Hezbollah and Marxist Left flags flying in the CBD is kinda suspicious. And here's my post on that very subject with that fun photo that describes so much about the multiculti dream come true.

The Age newspaper running pieces by Jew hating Islamists and Marxist Leftard traitors and self-loathing Left Jews on a regular basis is suspicious. Even politicians and Police...Yep, suspicious. The ABC, SBS and our universities employing and paying the same people to propagandise the same is again, suspicious.

That none of the major best selling empirical books by well known and respected analysts, writers and journalists on the subject of terror are in the public mind or in the media at all really, is suspicious again. And that anyone who aids or supports in writing, words, actions, deeds or financially etc, is clearly guilty of piracy ie: terrorism, according to the 300 year old international laws of piracy of which Australia is a signatory. And not a single action has been taken on this when offences occur 24/7. Yep, suspicious.

To the Attorney Generals P.A, I said that I was not impressed with the curiously female public face of our silly security services cos' they just won't answer serious questions and just hang up. She answered "I hope you don't include me?"

Oh no, I said. I'm still talking to you obviously. She then proceeded to not answer any serious question and hung up! So yes, you're silly too so you really included yourself, didn't you? Apparently receptionists do a security analysis and profile ad hoc on the phone, make a conclusion and hang up and that's good enough? No name, number or shoe size. Yep, I have suspicions of someones stupidity and on a shocking scale. And all this time I thought it was me!

I wanted to ask if there was ANYONE, anyone at all at the rather absurd and oxymoronic named NS and ASIO that was truly intelligent, honest, informed and had read a book lately if at all, but I didn't get the chance. Big deal. It's just a matter of our life and death. I imagine they all have bunkers. They were absolutely bunkers! Boom tish! Only one didn't hang up on me so kudos to one of the women at the NS. Not much though, is it? It's a little like the embarrassing Chaser prank at the meeting of world boobs. We have to play along that the expensive security and fancy dress with all the right phraseology, is reflective of any known reality and oh so effective, when it ain't when slightly tested.

It's like the dope who thinks they can counter and fight and then you easily just slap them. "I wasn't ready!" they invariably say. That's the whole point, Jim.

The inauthentic fool never is ready. What a joke. See how unprepared the authorities were for the bushfires? They let Marxist Green Leftard policies run rampant for years with an entirely predictable and hideous result. And golly, no warning to thousands. Yeah, it was all Global Warmings fault. Give me a fucking break with that global $cam and uber gravy train.

When the first terrorist attack breaks through in Australia, and by the law of averages they will, they'll say "...no one could have known it would be so er, surprising! We must review! We must wack off!" Hey, just have another interfaith dialogue, bub. It's a great way spread Islam, which again, is entirely coincidental. Oops! I accidentally connected a religion to terror! Don't worry, Islam is not a religion. It's a political project and a total nihilist ideology founded by a pervert and psychopath. Nope, it's not the Attorney General. Think 7th century desert tribal assassin lunatics.

Oh yes, its just come to me! I remember which religion now and who those terrorists are that commit over 95% of global violence. It's ISLAM and they're MUSLIMS. Gee, arrest those bigots at the offical US government National Counter Terrorism Centre now for slandering the people who just happen to be Muslims of Al Qaeda!

Golly gosh and jeepers creepers! I must call the National Security Lukewarmline and ASIO and let them know! ASIO, the Australian Stupid Idiot Organisation. Or maybe I won't and save fifty cents. I'm gonna need it to build my underground headquarters in the High Sierras before the whole shithouse comes down. Here's a thought. If you really care about the millions and millions of ordinary Muslims in Islamic states and elsewhere and many of us do, well maybe it'd be a good idea to be honest about Islam and terror? Take them at their word and actions for example? Crazy enough to work.

And these human beings have no choice where it's invariably compulsory to be a Muslim, and dangerous to be otherwise. And even dangerous to be a Muslim, or not enough or the wrong kind etc, etc, etc. Thus they're victims too of one mans insanity. Thus faithfreedomorg is run by ex-Muslims and others. Yep, save the Muslims. No, the PC don't seem to mind what happens there as long as we don't point it out. How snug. Anyone for official idiocy? You be the judge. God help us all. Still, it's a larf, innit? Not much lately.

"Islam is waging a 1300 year old asymmetrical war for a global Islamic caliphate from without and within America.” Obama if he wasn't a dirty liar.

Barry Hussein Sotoero Barack Obama: "Gobble gobble!"

King Pervert Abdullah: "Hey let me fully unzip first!"

Yes, if only Barry Hussein Sotouero Barack Obama wasn't a dirty lying dhimmi, a crypto-Marxist Muslim and an embarrassingly brittle narcissistic and super incompetent coward.



Yep, Barry said in his uber-cognitive dissonant PC way that “...the United States “is not and will never be at war with Islam.” Barry bullshit. Gee, I'll let all those people that have been beheaded and blown up know immediately.

Gee, whose attacking us then? Oh, just some mistaken "people" that we all "misunderstand" that we can't even name or recognise. Amazingly, they're all consistently and fanatically propelled without let-up, by the SAME IDENTICAL er, "twisting" of lovely Islam. An incredible 1300 year old coincidence! Another fantastic coincidence is that they look, speak, think, plan, live and act the same, just like golly, Muslims! And this is just like Mohammad and as the Koran explicitly says to!

Amazing! But just a coincidence.

Sadly old boy, Islam declared war on everything and everyone not Muslim and Islamic over a thirteen hundred years ago, and in a billions of ways since, has continued their ETERNAL WAR against the non-Islamic world. Millions of Muslims commit to this relentless jihad twenty four hours a day, seven days a week and year after year at some stage or another, in most every country and state in the world.

Imagine it being 1944 and FDR saying “The United States is not and will never be at war war with Nazism, the code of Bushido, Emperor worship and Shintoism, fascism or Communism.”

And the MSM reporting straight faced that FDR was: “Calling for a greater partnership with the Axis world in an address to the Reichstag. FDR called Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and fascist Italy, important U.S. allies in many areas, including the fight against World War 11.

He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and fascism, portraying terrorist groups such as the Wehrmacht, the SS and Kamikaze pilots as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Axis forces.

“Let me say this as clearly as I can,” FDR said. “The United States is not and never will be at war with Nazism, fascism or Bushido, which is a religion of peace. In fact, our partnership with the Nazi world is critical...in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all totalitarian political projects reject.”


Colonel Neville: Hey, whatever big lie works for the current suicidal PC facade. Gee, how long will this fraud work? Well, Muslims have committed over 13,000 reported terrorist attacks since 9/11 and yet, the seemingly simple and direct statement of “kill the kaffir and infidel!” backed up by relentless MUSLIM ACTIONS, still doesn’t register with many. Go figure.

Here's more of B.O's crawling spineless lying dhimmi speech at this link, with lot's of drivel like we're all the same and "we pray to the same God", "I believe that Islam is a great religion that preaches peace", a "Muslim partnership" etc. All absolute moral equvalence bunk of course, so no. And as per usual, that the free West has caused Muslim resentment by Muslims murdering thousands of civilians and so on, in much the same way that armed bank robbers are often angry at bank staff.

Obama said and I kid you not: “There is an old Turkish proverb: ‘You cannot put out fire with flames." But Jihadist Muslims try, don't they?

Barry: "But force alone cannot solve our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism. The future must belong to those who create, not those who destroy. That is the future we must work for, and we must work for it together."

Yes, whenever you meet an violent extremist, reach out and talk to them and mot of all listen! To your own screaming as your head comes off. Yes, passive suicide and slaughter of the self is the best eh? Gee, didn't "those who create" build the World Trade Centre, Vienna and the giant Buddha?

And didn't golly, extremists either destroy or lay siege to them? And gee, isn't it clear from Obama's disgusting words and embarrassing cowardly behaviour, that "the future" belongs to the most violent Muslims? For Islam, violence and murder works EVERYTIME. Instant Western apology and concessions!

Yes, and what is it exactly, that the Muslim world last created beyond lies, oppression, dysfunction, irrationality, madness, violence, perversion and death? Zero, literally.


Via Amazon reviews on Stealth Jihad by Robert Spencer:

“Most terrorism experts agree: it is not "if" we are attacked again, but "when." Yet the assault has already happened. A silent battle is being waged on our nation everyday. Not with guns and bombs, but via covert sources: Islamic charities, the ACLU--even presidential candidates. They are all pawns in a stealth holy war.

Unwittingly advancing the jihadist agenda not by violence, but through endeavors designed to acclimate and subject us to Islamic law--just the way Osama bin Laden wants it. In Stealth Jihad, bestselling author Robert Spencer exposes how a silent but lethal movement is advancing on the U.S. and calls upon Americans to resist it--before it's too late.”

From the Inside Flap.

Does America face a jihadist threat that's even bigger than terrorism?
While our homeland security efforts are focused on preventing terrorist attacks, another jihadist threat is growing right here in America--in plain sight.

In Stealth Jihad, Islam expert and New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer blows the whistle on a long-term plot by Islamic jihadists to undermine the United States. This effort aims not to bring America to its knees through attacks with guns or bombs, but to subvert the country from within--by gradually Islamizing America. The ultimate goal, the stealth jihadists themselves declare, is nothing less than the adoption of Islamic law in the United States.

Describing the disturbing ease with which stealth jihadists have already become ensconced in the American political and media landscapes, Spencer exposes the full modus operandi of the movement as revealed in a stunning document unveiled in a recent terrorism funding trial. In this unsettling book, he explains:

* Which Islamic fundamentalist organization is behind the stealth jihad.

* How stealth jihadists have reinvented themselves as mainstream civil rights activists--despite their many past declarations of Islamic supremacism.

* How stealth jihadists played a key role in formulating U.S. government guidelines for the War on Terror.

* How insistence on "accommodating" Islamic cultural and religious practices in America is part of a calculated strategy to achieve a dangerous larger agenda.

* The effort by stealth jihadists to whitewash the teaching of Islam in schools.

* What can be done to defeat the stealth jihad and preserve America's liberty
America, Spencer demonstrates, is all but oblivious to a new kind of threat presented by a loosely organized movement whose activists are well funded, highly motivated, and relentless in pursuit of their agenda. This book is a wake-up call for a country so focused on foreign threats that it has left itself vulnerable to a growing danger much closer to home.”


Hotairs Ed Morrissey get’s it almost right on how George Bush spouted the same wilfully ignorant PC nonsense and blather, on how Islam is just dandy. The Ed spoils it all with a phony or is it stupid?, caveat of his own:

“And he’s right; the last thing we would want to do would be to declare war on a billion people just on the basis of their religion.

Colonel Neville: Hey, but it's OK if millions of Muslims worldwide have declared war on us, and most Muslim states either support it overtly or covertly in some way. Check. Nuance.

Ed: "The more we can keep the Muslims on the sidelines, the better off we are in fighting against the radicals.”

Colonel Neville: That entire sentence is an absurd fantasy entirely without merit or empirical evidence, cos there is none. But there's lotsa dark laughs!]

So balls and utter nonsense. WE ARE AT WAR, but unlike WWll, we are under attack globally and domestically with an overwhelming level of infiltration, self-delusion and out and out LIES that is beyond belief. And if we had the same kind of dominant super denial in WWll, without a doubt WE WOULD HAVE LOST.


Hotair: “Barack Obama, making his first visit to a Muslim nation as president, declared Monday the United States “is not and will never be at war with Islam.”

Calling for a greater partnership with the Islamic world in an address to the Turkish parliament, Obama called the country an important U.S. ally in many areas, including the fight against terrorism. He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and Muslims, portraying terrorist groups such as Al Qaida as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Muslims.

“Let me say this as clearly as I can,” Obama said. “The United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical...in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all faiths reject.”
Here’s the objectionable part:

The U.S. president is trying to mend fences with a Muslim world that felt it had been blamed by America for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

Yes, because George Bush spent the last seven years blaming the entire Muslim world for the 9/11 attacks, right? Right? Er, no, as this collection of Bush quotes regarding Islam makes excruciatingly clear. In fact, Bush emphasized friendship with Muslims from the very start of the war:

• “I’ve made it clear, Madam President, that the war against terrorism is not a war against Muslims, nor is it a war against Arabs. It’s a war against evil people who conduct crimes against innocent people.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush and President Megawati of Indonesia The Oval Office, Washington, D.C. September 19, 2001.

• “The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That’s not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don’t represent peace. They represent evil and war.” — Remarks by the President at Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. September 17, 2001.

• “All of us here today understand this: We do not fight Islam, we fight against evil.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush to the Warsaw Conference on Combating Terrorism November 6, 2001.

• “I have assured His Majesty that our war is against evil, not against Islam. There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion. The exact opposite of the teachings of the Al Qaeda organization, which is based upon evil and hate and destruction.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush and His Majesty King Abdullah of Jordan The Oval Office, Washington, D.C. September 28, 2001.

• “Islam is a vibrant faith. Millions of our fellow citizens are Muslim. We respect the faith. We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.” – Remarks by President George W. Bush on U.S. Humanitarian Aid to Afghanistan Presidential Hall, Dwight David Eisenhower Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. October 11, 2002.

And so on; there are plenty of examples to make the point. Obama spoke in the tradition established by Bush over the last seven-plus years of emphasizing that America did not declare war on Islam. That’s been obvious through our partnership with Islamic nations, such as Iraq, Turkey, Afghanistan, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, just to name a few. And he’s right; the last thing we would want to do would be to declare war on a billion people just on the basis of their religion. The more we can keep the Muslims on the sidelines, the better off we are in fighting against the radicals.

However, the AP wants to pretend that this is some new effort by the US to assure Muslims of our intentions. It decidedly is not, and perhaps a mention that Bush tried making these same assurances for almost his entire presidency would be in order here.” Ed Morrissey still not admitting the bleeding obvious.

Ralph White review of Stealth Jihad:

“Robert Spencer describes an America that welcomes its mortal enemies into its midst, gives them equal time with our founders' ideals, and defends their right to hate us. Spencer is a veteran of the struggle against jihad; his previously published titles include "The Truth About Muhammad," "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, and the Crusades," "Religion of Peace, Why Christianity is and Islam isn't," "The Myth of Islamic Tolerance," and "Islam Unveiled..."

Spencer adds his voice to Islam's courageous adversaries, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Brigitte Gabriel, Mark Steyn, Bruce Bawer, Carafano and Rosenweig, Benjamin and Simon, Efraim Karsh, Mary Habeck. Take the time to understand Spencer's and these other authors' warnings; distill their thoughts; and join the resistance to Islam's malevolent spread in America. France and Holland are already past the tipping point and will have some form of sharia law within 50 years. If you don't think it can happen here in America consider the Minnesota taxi incidents of 2006.

One taxi driver refused to pick up passengers carrying alcoholic beverages at the Minneapolis airport because to do so would "insult Islam." Soon other drivers joined the embargo against passengers with alcohol.

The city tried a system using different colored taxis to accommodate the drivers who were and weren't willing to transport alcohol, but the system broke down. Within three months 5,400 passengers were denied service. The drivers claimed that they were defending "freedom of religion." In fact, Spencer shows that no one was preventing the drivers from practicing Islam.

What the drivers were doing was "asserting sharia norms over non-Muslims." Had the precedent been allowed, what was to prevent drivers from refusing to carry passengers with pork products, or an unmarried couple?

Spencer shows that it is the Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al Banna, which is directing these and other incursions into the unalienable rights which Americans blithely take for granted. The Muslim American Society is the Brotherhood's front organization in America, and the Council of Islamic-American Relations is its political arm. These organizations reject peaceful coexistence, [promote] moral equivalence, and reject pluralistic governance. Resistance to jihad is not bigoted, racist, hate mongering, or Islamophobic; it is self defence against the war Muslims are obliged to wage against us. For them to live peacefully with us is to insult the prophet Muhammad.

You will not have to believe Spencer. His argument is most forcefully made by Islam's governance documents, the Qur'an and the Hadith (traditions of the prophet), and by Muslim writers and speakers themselves. Spencer quotes Islam's words verbatim and shows that there is no scope for compromise in the mandate to convert us, extract jizya (humiliating tax on non-Muslims), or kill us. These are their sole options and they mean business. America's very openness, its civil rights, its democratic ideals and institutions, and its tolerance create a vulnerability which Muslims use against us.”