Obamessiah, the MSM, the UN and Sean Penn love and support Marxist trash against free people.

“..there is no threat about Communism here in Cuba.” Fidel Castro Cuba 1959. therealcuba com.



“We want peace and democracy!! Zelaya, never come back!”

“Rally in favor of our new government and against Manuel Zelaya as the President of Honduras. Parque Central, Tegucigalpa, Honduras 30/06/2009.”

Colonel Neville: Compare the vids above with the ones below and spot the bleeding difference. Guess which one most of the MSM is reporting on and which side The Obamessiah is on, and win a prize! First prize is utter despair for the Republic, while second prize is a fully stocked and armed, nuclear proofed bunker in the High Sierras.

Shown above are the virtually unseen in the MSM, pro-Honduran government and anti-Zeliar, anti-Chavez, anti-Castro rally. Dig the crowd roaring approval of the army helicopter overhead! My Lord... The true Latin America is NOT a deluded or delibrate leftist. When the real masses of people have a voice and support, they want freedom, democracy and capitalist prosperity. And guns.

And below is an anti- Honduran government pro-Zeliar, pro-Chavez, pro-Castro leftist rally roughly th same size and similar profile as two average sized police line-ups.




Gee, The Obamessiah and totalitarian Marxist and Islamist swine, EUroweenie decadent suicides and the UN etc, all support Zeliar the Marxist and fat Chavez the Che the child killer lovin’ creep and the Castro twins... Ya don't say? Big as they say, fucking surprise. Well they must. Gotta keep up that leftard house of cards whatever it takes.




Colonel Neville: So the laughable ABC news avoids reporting the Honduran massive ANTI-Zaliar/Chavez/Castro/Communist protests that show Hondurans overwhelmingly in support of the government, by showing a few dozen leftards protesting about the death of one protester.

As per usual, for the largely wilfully biased, manipulative, incompetent and venal Bolshevik knitting circle that is ‘their’ ABC. They reported the Muslim Uigher riots not as the entirely common worldwide practice of Muslim riots and golly right near the gosh, Pakistani border, but as something the local Han Chinese created. Maybe so but no.

Maybe the Uighurs have a serious halal beef? Gee, but there were Uighurs in Gitmo etc, etc. Trust Chinese media? Not always less than here. What are the chances from experience of a certain growing percentage of Muslims within a state being a million laughs? The ABC apparently got the number of Uighers beaten to death wrong etc, showed no history of the region nor mentioned the massive arrests.

Finally the ABC seem to have almost barely made up for it somewhat, [as feebly as they can] on their 7pm report, though I missed much of it. Ah, images of gee, angry Muslim Uighurs with gee, 7th century fashion statement beards. The reporter said how "shocked" people are, shocked! at seeing images of Han Chinese being violently attacked by golly, Muslims. And gosh, said Muslims are demanding things! Like an independent caliphate, oops, Islamic terrorist state, oops, a peace loving but misunderstood Islamic basket case within China.

So the global Islamic threat is out of the bag dad in China. Good grief.

Gee, and I wonder what possible reason anyone could have for finding certain Muslim percentages problematic? Muslim immigration has been a great success everywhere...No. Try Islaminaction.

Via hotair:Comment: “12:17pm.

Inocentes. El comisionado nacional de los derechos humanos Ramón Custodio dijo que no fueron los militares quienes dispararon al joven que murió ayer en Tonctontín.

TRANSLATION:

Innocent. The National Human Rights commisioner Ramon Custodio said that the military was not responsible for shooting and killing the youth that died yesterday at Toncontin (Tegucigalpa airport). El Heraldo. elduende on July 6, 2009.

Comment via hotair: “...the Honduran Constitution is explicit that any President that even suggests, let alone, agitates for a Constitutional reform of term limits has immediately forfeit his seat as President and cannot run for re-election for at least 10 years. If you can come up with legal authority that countermands that clause in the Honduran Constitution please share it with all of us." elduende on July 6, 2009.

Comment: "You know I think the absolutely worse thing about the Left is their lying. It is the root of all their evil deeds. They know they cannot get into power if they tell the truth about who they are, what they think and what their intentions are. They have no desire to get out the facts or to present them objectively. The ends always justifies any means. (Yes, straight from Alinsky, whether they realize it or not).

Not to say some of the R’s don’t do that as well, but the Left is just absolutely twisted about truth, from the big names to the minions on the web.

It’s certainly appropriate that Alinsky dedicated Rules For Radicals to Lucifer, whom Jesus called a liar and the father of lies." INC on July 6, 2009.

Comment: “Members of Congress concerned about Zelaya’s possible ties to drug traffic.

Meanwhile, five members of the U.S. Congress, including three from Florida, want to know if the Drug Enforcement Administration has evidence that connects ex-President Mel Zelaya to drug trafficking. In a letter to President Barack Obama, Florida Congressmen Mario Diaz-Balart, Lincoln Diaz-Balart and Connie Mack, joined by California’s Dana Rochbacher and Michigan’s Thad McCotter, referred to assertions from Honduran Foreign Minister Enrique Ortez that the DEA possessed such evidence.

The letter concluded that the Administration should not press for the reinstatement of Mr. Zelaya if our law enforcement agencies have evidence that he is involved in drug traffic and asked the President for a direct response. I don’t know if this was posted yet, sorry if it was. If Zelaya is successfully reinstated as President all this goes away." fourdeucer on July 6, 2009.

Comment: “That the President of the United States would support Zelaya’s attempt to become a dictator is at once shocking and morally criminal. Their constitution states that the president can only serve one term, the supreme court of Honduras upheld the Honduran constitution. Zelaya refused to leave office so the military removed him. All legal, no coup, why is our media and government blind to the fact that Honduras is following their legal constitution?” Mr A on July 6, 2009.

Comment: “Meanwhile...Hillary Clinton, our wonderful SecState, will be meeting with Zelaya in Washington this week.

Giving a thug legitimacy is NOT the way to run foreign policy. No doubt about it, the Obama Adminsitration will stop at nothing to make sure Zelaya gets to force his way back into Honduras and we will recognize Zelaya as the sole legitimate “leader” of Honduras." coldwarrior on July 6, 2009.

“You missed this from Octavio Sánchez, lawyer, former presidential adviser (2002-05) and minister of culture (2005-06) of the Republic of Honduras."

"A ‘coup’ in Honduras? Nonsense.

These are the facts: On June 26, President Zelaya issued a decree ordering all government employees to take part in the “Public Opinion Poll to convene a National Constitutional Assembly.” In doing so, Zelaya triggered a constitutional provision that automatically removed him from office.

Constitutional assemblies are convened to write new constitutions. When Zelaya published that decree to initiate an “opinion poll” about the possibility of convening a national assembly, he contravened the unchangeable articles of the Constitution that deal with the prohibition of reelecting a president and of extending his term. His actions showed intent.

Our Constitution takes such intent seriously. According to Article 239: “No citizen who has already served as head of the Executive Branch can be President or Vice-President. Whoever violates this law or proposes its reform [emphasis added], as well as those that support such violation directly or indirectly, will immediately cease in their functions and will be unable to hold any public office for a period of 10 years.”

Notice that the article speaks about intent and that it also says “immediately” – as in “instant,” as in “no trial required,” as in “no impeachment needed.” INC on July 6, 2009.

“Many people may not have known that Zelaya’s flight started from Washington, where he apparently has set up his office in exile. White House officials told the Washington Post that they expect him to return to Washington after the aborted attempt to return to Honduras.”
Comment: “Here’s what the UN is saying:

UN chief calls for constitutional order in Honduras. GENEVA (AFP) — UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon called Monday on the Organization of American States to work to restore constitutional order in Honduras, where the president has been blocked from returning after a coup.

By “work to restore constitutional order” they mean “disregard the constitutional order”. What do they propose should be done with the Honduran Congress and Honduran Supreme Court if Zelaya is to be reinstalled?

Shouldn’t the UN and OAS clairfy who it is they believe has the authority to determine what is constitutional in Honduras since they clearly don’t believe the congress and supreme court has the authority? If UN/OAS succeeded in reinstalling Zelaya and Zelaya immediately disbands the congress, court and constitution, the UN and OAS wouldn’t have a problem with that, and at the very least, the majority of the 33 OAS members would vote to recognize the Zelaya dictatorship as legitimate.
Buddahpundit."

Comment: “La caída de Zelaya- sostiene el analista- genera mucha crispación y mucha angustia entre los presidente de los países de la Alba, donde hay ejércitos y temen que lo ocurrido en Honduras puede causar un efecto dominó. *Además: “Estamos dispuestos a pagar el precio del aislamiento político y diplomático con tal de que Honduras siga siendo una tierra de paz y libertad”. El Heraldo.

TRANSLATION:

The Fall of Zelaya, the Analyst says, causes much concern and anguish among the (leftist) presidents of the ALBA countries, because they worry about the possible reaction of their own armies and a domino type effect occuring. Furthermore, we are willing to pay the price of political and diplomatic isolation if it means that Honduras remains a land of peace and liberty.

TRANSLATION 2:

It means what I said earlier about the leftists being worried because the Honduran’s have stopped Chavez cold. Their whole enterprise was predicated on the assumption that they could take and consolidate power on the sly. The impunity has stopped and now Obama’s buddies are worried about a reverse domino theory taking hold, threatening them all. I know that Bolivia is about to pop too. Evo Morales is in trouble." elduende on July 6, 2009.

Comment: “Here’s one of those important rules of thumb...if he lasted that long as Zelaya’s VP, Chavez must have approved of him.

That’s the thing he obviously served with Zelaya and knows what has been going on with Chavez. He felt comfortable enough to prepare a run for the top spot last winter when it was obvious the term limited Zelaya was to have stepped down next January.

Something must have motivated Chavez to push Zelaya to raise the constitutional reform issue now. Did Chavez decide the lame duck Zelaya had nothing to lose or did something raise his hackles regarding Santo’s reliability should he win in Novemeber. In my book, for now, and irrespective of his positions today, Santos is tainted by virtue of his association with Zelaya and Chavez. Its the safe play. The Hondurans would be dumb to go through all this trouble to then cede the country to Zelaya lite.

Trust him about as far as you can throw him. I’m sure all sides are scrambling to figure this out too." elduende on July 6, 2009.

Obama and Sean Penn love Hugo Chavez, Castro and Zeliar.




Sean hearts Hugo: The saga continues. By Doug Powers. April 23, 2009. 08:51 PM.

"Every few days I like to post something to remind us that, in spite of all the madness and stresses that may encompass our daily lives, we remain inexorably sane and grounded in comparison to some of the attention-starved, hypocritical, “phonier than the contents of bikini tops on Malibu beaches” Hollywood Left sect. Today’s poster-boy for Thorazine is a frequent guest in the leftist Cuckoo’s Nest: actor Sean Penn.

In a piece at the Huffington Post published yesterday, Sean Penn rode to the rescue of his pal Hugo Chavez, defending the Venezuelan dictator against his American critics like a knight in clueless armor:

"I know President Chavez well. Whether or not one agrees with all his policies, what is certainly true of Chavez is that he is a warm and friendly man with a robust sense of humor (who daily risks his own life for his country in ways Dick Cheney could never imagine). To treat such a man coldly is akin to spitting on him. As a country we’ve done enough of that.

Say what you will, but it has only resulted in the self-celebration of our smirking spitters, while costing us international respect, American lives, and left wounds in the hands of our children’s future. The Cheneys, down to the O’Reillys and Hannitys and Limbaughs, effectively hate the principles upon which we were founded. They are among the greatest cowards in all of American history."

Sean’s defending an outspoken, anti-American communist dictator from certain Americans because they hate the principles upon which America was founded? Nothing can better confirm your lucidity, or hone your sense of humor for that matter, that watching a wealthy American actor defending a man who, if in power in this country, would put a fast clamp on the “artistic freedom” of Sean Penn and his vacuous pals.

And the Hollywood Left has the gall to call black Republicans “self loathing”?

Whenever I see Penn, Glover, Belafonte, Spacey, et al, sucking up to anti-American, anti-capitalist thugs, goons, tinpots and despots I can’t help but think of the giddy minions boarding the spaceship at the end of the “To Serve Man” episode of the Twilight Zone. It’s a cookbook, Sean!

Perhaps the most frustrating thing about the Hollywood left is that, even though they have more money than brains, most have never been quite stupid enough to move to a country that practices what they preach. But why should they when it might be coming to them?

You can learn all about Penn’s special friendship with Hugo Chavez in Sean’s upcoming sequel [to Milk.]"

Michael Savage listener recounts how the past is becoming the present.




Savage on Obama digs Seliar, Fidel and Chavez.




Part 2.

“If Ali Khamenei and the Guardian Council had hoped to ride out the anger over the rigged presidential election, they didn’t figure on Qum. The association of Islamic leaders in the most important religious city in Iran have declared the election illegitimate, which threatens to undermine the credibility of the Khamenei regime’s claim to divine direction. If the clerics of Iran bolt, what does Khamenei have left?"

Gatewaypundit with vid proof of MSM props up tyranny.

Gatewaypundit with statistical proof of Democrat liberal cognitive dissonance.

“Obama will more than quadruple the US budget deficit his first year in office.

The US has lost 16,000 jobs each day since Democrats passed their non-Stimulus bill, the largest redistribution of wealth from the private sector to government officials in US history.

The US lost over 2.5 million jobs in the first four months of this year under the Obama Administration.The US unemployment rate rose from 7.6% to 9.5% under Obama..the highest rate in 26 years.

The stock market is down 3,000 points from a year ago. And, the crash did not hit the economy until September.

By any measurement, GDP growth is far below what it was last year. Gross Domestic Product fell at a 5.5 per cent annual rate in 2009's first financial quarter.

Over the past year, overall levels of consumer confidence have bounced around a lot but ended up with little change. For the full month June 2008, the Rasmussen Consumer Index was at 71.9. In June, 2009, that number was 72:0.

But underneath those stable topline numbers is a dramatic shift along party lines. A year ago, Republicans were far more confident than Democrats. Today, the reverse is true.

Among Democrats, the Rasmussen Consumer Index jumped from 53.7 a year ago to 79.5 in 2009.

Among Republicans, confidence was at 99.4 a year ago and it’s fallen to 68.6 today.

As for those not affiliated with either major party, there’s been little change.
So, democrats say the economy is better off today.

OK. Lets look at at a few sets of numbers...”

Continue being appalled.
KrAzY ObAMa lOVe wanes.



Gateway with media garbage that Cuba is the alleged 7th happiest country AKA poverty stricken Communist Stalinist police state murderous dictatorship. More from faustablog.


The absurdly relativist posturing of the useful idiot and liberal her Edward R. Murrow, the Keith Olberman twerp prototype, sucks up Castro’s exciting revolutionary cum.

“..there is no threat about Communism here in Cuba.” Fidel Castro Cuba 1959.




The fabulous real Cuban known as generationY at desdecuba com.

As on 9/11, there is no government when it comes to terrorism. They ignore, lie, cover, host, support, hire, run, bow and reach out to terrorists.

The great, empirical and free Mike Savage on why we must get armed. You cannot rely on the government to protect you. There is no government when it comes to terrorism. Terrorism can be anywhere, everywhere and at anytime.



Now dig this, hepcats. Here's our own er, Australian alleged security leaders in all their incompetent, lying PC inglorious dishonour and dhimmitude. The National Security Hotline people are objectively boobs and their site is junk, and we are therefore logically doomed. Imagine an alleged government security agency that helps our enemy hide in plain sight, by refusing to even name them, and makes calling them by their true name an illegal act? Imagine no longer.

Mike Savage on Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder, calls Americans “racists" and “cowards.” As you do if you’re part of Obama’s Marxist bigot and racist administration. “"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards," Holder said.” And how in the US, blacks can get free suport for their education and whites don’t. No really. That's identity politics, along with abortion and welfare, the three main pillars of Marxist sodden left liberalism a la Democrats.

“Here's an interesting tidbit guys and gals: In the last election..."Murder rate in counties that voted Democratic: 13.2 per 100,000 people Republican: 2.1 per 100,000 people."

Ilgeneralisimo.




Mike on the marines and the Barbary Muslim pirates.




A Savage history lesson on Islamofascism Pt 1.




Mike Savage on why vets suicide. Vets have a lower percentage of suicide and crime than the general populace. Maybe because they're real men and women. Could be.




Mike rams home some facts on FDR and history on a whining boob.




Mike explains FDR to a weak liberal chic to no avail.




Mike on Obama the revolutionary neo-Marxist/Fabian socialist, Stalin, Mussolini and Nazi geeks. Pt 1 of 2.




Mike t-bones a libtard on socialism.




Mike crushes the kind of irrational low IQ uneducated morons who think socialism is a great idea.

Comment: I'm a Conservative and I drive a 1992 Dodge Shadow, are you gonna take that away from me Brian so some gang-banging, purse snatching, walking AIDS epidemic doesn't have to walk to the crack house and the liquor store--don't fucking think so my friend. Ilgeneralisimo.

Mike Savage update Pt 1 of 4 on La Raza[the race] Mexican pro-terrorist racist group and its VIP member Sotomayor. A disabled vet and pharmacist stops black armed robbers who attempted an armed robbery on him while menacing two women in the store.




Mike Savage talks to the great Walid Shoebat.




Mike on the Fairness Doctrine defeat. AKA left liberal Democrat control freakery.




Mike on guns and Obama shadow puppets.




Mike Savage talks straight and angry about Jihadist Muslims. What is the other kind? Thinks...




Mike on bomb Iran and cut off the tentacles.

Saudi Intellectual States That Western Civilization Has Liberated Mankind.

Sane, healthy, free, balanced and typical young free women courtesy of the Western Canon ie: Judeo Christianity, the Greeks and Romans, capitalist free-market democracy being the two essential things that mean a place doesn't suck,  trust, respect for life, civil limited government, low tax, personal responsibility, even the er, Enlightenment, The Industrial Revolution, The Renaissance, The Constitution, fun, the free flow of ideas, private property laws, the rule of law, the Anglosphere, science, free markets, music, art, humor, movies, radio, technology, the scientific method, innovation...

...the right to bear arms, dentistry, plumbing, the skyscraper, sanitation, medicine, paediatrics, refrigeration, household appliances, cars, planes, the space program, literature, the Jews, industrial food production, dogs, great men and women, the Internet, respect for life, paradox, failure and success, nuclear energy, oil, nuclear weapons, books, the rights of the individual over the group, sacrifice, generosity, courage, love, freedom of speech and expression, hate, philosophy, Jesus, confidence, exceptionalism, logical empiricism and the men and women of the military etc, etc, etc... 

"Humbug! Fun is a lie and freedom is a Zionist plot!" Sheik Pervypoop Bin Kharzy Urynal.

"This just proves in my diseased mind that the West is inferior to Hamass run Gaza, Iran, North Korea and Cuba! Now where's that check from Hezbollah? I have a flying carpet in my attic, you know." George Galloway.











Gee, is Islam monstrously retarded, irrational, oppressive and naturally murderous? Who can tell? It's wrong to base our judgement on reason and millions of objective facts.

"It's a madhouse! A MADHOUSE!" Chuck in Planet Of The Apes.

Well, the following Saudi rowdy is "reformist thinker Ibrahim Al-Buleihi," and he's almost our man in Riyadh, as he very splendidly appreciates and see's the great human triumph of the Western Canon more clearly and passionately than the average Marxist University lecturer. Go figure. And everything he says about the great and free West and how fortunate we are, is entirely and empirically true. In fact, it's a simply brilliant, joyous and empirical effort.

The capitalist free-market, [despite massive government regulatory burdens] and civil, democratic West, [despite crony rent seeking socialist leftists] is a small and recent bright light in the long dark tunnel of history. Still, he says Islam is er, cool, [no, it's not in the least bit hip or fun or even useful] and has just been er, 'hijacked', ironically by actual Muslim hijackers. Hahahahahaha! I love that line. It's one of mine. So he's not entirely on the money but then few people from anywhere ever are. As in ex-leftists who must at some point completely repudiate, reject and fight Marxism, one usually needs to completely reject, leave and face Islam to really get how awful it is.

But ya gotta admire the courage of a guy who will state the bleeding obvious facts from within the totalitarian maw of Saudi Arabia. It's a miracle that anyone at all in any Islamic shit pile can even think outside the Ka'bah and maintain their reason and humanity, but many do.  Three cheers and we hope that he lives long enough.

Here an Indian Muslim reflects on no scientific minds and advancement in Muslim World.  [Open weekdays. Try the wild Hijack Ride!] A lot like the Westworld movie, minus all the fun and after it all goes horribly haywire and still Koran Land and Mohammad Acres is oddly even murderously robotic and inhuman. It's a laugh. No.

Memri TV April 29 2009.

"In an interview published April 23, 2009 in the Saudi Daily 'Okaz, reformist thinker Ibrahim Al-Buleihi expressed his admiration for Western civilization. The interview was posted on the same day on the Elaph website. [1] Al-Buleihi calls on the Arabs to acknowledge the greatness of Western civilization, and to admit the deficiencies of their own culture. He states that such self-criticism is a precondition to any change for the better. Ibrahim Al-Buleihi is a member of the Saudi Shura Council. [2] Following are excerpts from the interview:

"If It Were Not for the Accomplishments of the West, Our Lives Would Have Been Barren"

'Okaz: "I begin with the crucial issue which distinguishes your thought and which your opponents always raise against you - namely, your being completely dazzled by the West, while you completely belittle Arabic thought. Truly, this is the most outstanding feature of your writings. There is also extreme self-flagellation which many see [in your writings]. What is the cause of this?"

Buleihi: "My attitude towards Western civilization is an attitude based on obvious facts and great accomplishments; here is a reality full of wonderful and amazing things. [Recognizing] this doesn't mean that I am blindly fascinated. This is the very opposite of the attitude of those who deny and ignore the bright lights of Western civilization. Just look around...and you will notice that everything beautiful in our life has been produced by Western civilization:

...even the pen that you are holding in your hand, the recording instrument in front of you, the light in this room, and the journal in which you work, and many innumerable amenities, which are like miracles for the ancient civilizations. If it were not for the accomplishments of the West, our lives would have been barren. I only look objectively and value justly what I see and express it honestly. Whoever does not admire great beauty is a person who lacks sensitivity, taste, and observation. Western civilization has reached the summit of science and technology.

It has achieved knowledge, skills, and new discoveries, as no previous civilization before it. The accomplishments of Western civilization cover all areas of life: methods of organization, politics, ethics, economics, and human rights. It is our obligation to acknowledge its amazing excellence. Indeed, this is a civilization that deserves admiration.

The horrible backwardness in which some nations live is the inevitable result of their refusal to accept this [abundance of Western ideas and visions] while taking refuge in denial and arrogance."

'Okaz: "Sir, you can admire this civilization as much as you want, but not at the expense of others, especially our own civilization."

Buleihi: "My admiration for the West is not at the expense of others; rather, it is an invitation to those others to acknowledge their illusions and go beyond their inferiority and liberate themselves from backwardness. [Those others] should admit their shortcomings, and make an effort to overcome them; they should stop denying the truth and closing their eyes to the multitude of wonderful achievements. They should be fair towards those nations that achieved prosperity for themselves but did not monopolize it for themselves and instead allowed the whole world to share the results of this progress, so that other nations of the whole world now enjoy these achievements.

Furthermore, Western civilization has given to the world knowledge and skills which made it possible for them, the non-Western nations, to compete with it in production and share markets with it. Criticizing one's own deficiencies is a precondition to inducing oneself to change for the better.

Conversely, to glorify one's backward apathetic self is to establish and fortify backwardness, to strengthen the shackles of apathy, and to eradicate the capabilities of excellence. Backwardness is a shameful reality, which we should resent and from which we must liberate ourselves."

"Western Civilization is the Only Civilization that Liberated Man From His Illusions and Shackles; It Recognized His Individuality and Provided Him With Capabilities and Opportunities to Cultivate Himself and Realize His Aspirations."

'Okaz: "This may be so, and I'm with you in this demand but, sir, would you summarize for us the reason for your admiration of Western culture, so that we can have a basis for discussion?"

Buleihi: "There is no one reason, there are a thousand reasons, which all induce me to admire the West and emphasize its absolute excellence in all matters of life. Western civilization is the only civilization that liberated man from his illusions and shackles; it recognized his individuality and provided him with capabilities and opportunities to cultivate himself and realize his aspirations.

[Western civilization] humanized political authority and established mechanisms to guarantee relative equality and relative justice and to prevent injustice and to alleviate aggression.

This does not mean that this is a flawless civilization; indeed, it is full of deficiencies. Yet it is the greatest which man has achieved throughout history. [Before the advent of Western civilization,] humanity was in the shackles of tyranny, impotence, poverty, injustice, disease, and wretchedness.

"It is an extraordinary civilization, and it is not an extension of any ancient civilization, with the exception of Greek civilization, which is the source of contemporary civilization. I have completed a book on this great extraordinary civilizational leap, titled The Qualitative Changes in Human Civilization. Western civilization is its own product and it is not indebted to any previous civilization except for the Greek one...

It has revived the Greek achievements in the fields of philosophy, science, literature, politics, society, human dignity, and veneration of reason, while recognizing its shortcomings and illusions and stressing its continuous need for criticism, review and correction."

'Okaz: "In your words here, you completely wipe out all the endeavors and creativity of previous civilizations such as the Islamic one, by stating that the West not indebted to it."

Buleihi: "Indeed, it is not, nor is it indebted to any other previous civilization. Western civilization has its foundation in Greece in the sixth and fifth centuries BC; then it stopped in the Middle Ages, but resumed its progress in modern times, when its benefits have come to include all nations.

It is really extraordinary in every meaning of the word - excellence, uniqueness, and novelty...It has components and qualities which distinguish it from all previous and subsequent civilizations.

It is the product of philosophical thinking invented by the Greeks. The Europeans have based themselves on this kind of thinking, especially on its critical aspect, which developed the capability of producing objective knowledge that is always open to review, correction and progress..."

'Okaz: "Some Western thinkers wrote that Western civilization is an extension of previous civilizations. How can you, a Muslim Arab, deny this?"

Buleihi: "When we review the names of Muslim philosophers and scholars whose contribution to the West is pointed out by Western writers, such as Ibn Rushd, Ibn Al-Haitham, Ibn Sina, Al-Farbi, Al-Razi, Al-Khwarizmi, and their likes, we find that all of them were disciples of the Greek culture and they were individuals who were outside the [Islamic] mainstream. They were and continue to be unrecognized in our culture. We even burned their books, harassed them, [and] warned against them, and we continue to look at them with suspicion and aversion. How can we then take pride in people from whom we kept our distance and whose thought we rejected? "As for the question of cultural development, there are two approaches. According to one approach, civilization is the product of a cumulative process. However, this approach is contradicted by the facts of history. According to the other approach, a quantitative change does not become a qualitative one, except through an extraordinary leap. This is the correct compelling approach, which I adopt. Quantity cannot possibly turn into quality spontaneously.

"The only civilization which possesses the ingredients of perpetual progress is Western civilization, with its Greek foundation and its amazing contemporary formation.

Western civilization believes that it is impossible to possess absolute truth and that human perfection is impossible, so man must strive to achieve it while recognizing that it is impossible to reach. Thus it is the only civilization which is constantly growing and constantly reviewing and correcting itself and achieving continuous discoveries..."

"Humanity Lived Thousands of Years Ruminating on the Same Ideas and Living in the Same Conditions, Using the Same Tools... It Could Have Continued Forever In This Way If It Were Not For the Emergence of Philosophical Thinking in Greece."

          'Okaz: "Let me ask you about your complete fascination with Western civilization."

Buleihi: "The light of this civilization is very bright and only a blind person can be oblivious to its brightness. Anyone who is capable of sight and insight is inevitably fascinated by it...We should give credit where credit is due. Has any previous civilization dreamt of the astounding revelations and exact silences and complex technologies [achieved by Western civilization]?

Have previous generations imagined the possibility of opening the human chest or head and conducting intricate surgeries on the heart and brain? Could they imagine the deep understanding of the living cell and the way it is formed... Did they imagine airplanes, cars, telephones, and innumerable accomplishments of this civilization? Would you want us to go back to writing on parchment and papyrus and using wooden sticks for pens, and riding donkeys?

'Okaz: "Sorry, no one has asked you to return to the era of donkeys, but it is necessary to pass historical judgment in a fair and balanced way. You are saying that you want 'to give credit where credit is due,' but, in fact, you deny any credit to whatever existed before Western civilization, and while everybody recognizes that human achievements are cumulative in nature, you negate that axiomatic rule when you speak about Western accomplishments."

Buleihi: "Humanity lived thousands of years ruminating on the same ideas and living in the same conditions, using the same tools and instruments. It could have continued forever in this way if it were not for the emergence of philosophical thinking in Greece in the sixth and fifth centuries BC. Civilizational progress at its current level cannot be achieved by accumulation; rather, it is the outcome of great revolutions in the fields of thought, science, politics, society, and labor...

"What pushes man out of his routine is the struggle of ideas, the freedom of choice, and equal opportunity. The best proof of this is that many peoples today live in the depth of backwardness, despite the availability of science, technology, and ideas. They witness the examples of prosperity, and despite this, these backwards peoples are unable to abandon their trenches and free themselves from their shackles. In other words, they are unable to emulate those who are prosperous and they are completely unable to invent and initiate."

'Okaz: "There is a crucial question in our debate: do you understand by civilization only its material aspect?"

Buleihi: "The most important achievement of Western civilization is the humanization of political authority, dividing it into separate powers, and establishing and keeping a balance between the separate powers. Western civilization has given priority to the individual and subordinated its institutions, laws, and procedures to this principle, whereas in the old civilizations the individual was a cog in a machine."

"Ever Since the End of the Period of the Rightly-Guided Caliphs, Man's Individuality Was Eradicated in Arab History, And His Value Has Been Linked to His Political, Religious, Regional, or Tribal Affiliation."

'Okaz: "A cog in a machine? Do you believe that this is true also of Islamic civilization?"

Buleihi: "We sharply distinguish between Islam in itself and what people do in its name. The great principles of Islam and its sublime doctrines that emphasize and uphold human value and dignity have not had a chance throughout history to establish themselves.

Colonel Neville: Sadly, that little bit is pure balls and bullshit, but I understand that you are still a practicing Muslim and speaking from within the centre of God's Monkey House. So do carry on...

"Ever since the end of the period of the rightly-guided Caliphs, man's individuality was eradicated in Arab history and his value has been linked to his political, religious, regional, or tribal affiliation… The only civilization which acknowledges and respects man as an individual is Western civilization… Behavior in any field is not the outcome of teachings, as such, but rather of practice and actual experience...."

'Okaz: "Has this been the case throughout all of Arab history, in your opinion?"

Buleihi: "Yes, all of Arab history can be characterized in this gloomy way, except for the period of the rightly-guided Caliphs and discrete periods such as the reign of Omar ibn 'Abd Al-'Aziz. One should not confuse the sublime principles and doctrines of Islam with its history, which is full of mistakes, transgression, and tragedies. When the Abbasids overcame the Umayyads, they covered the bodies of the dead with rugs and held a feast over the bodies in a display of vengeance.

When [Caliph] Al-Ma'mun defeated his brother Al-Amin, he flayed him like a lamb. This scene recurs throughout our history. Political power is the pivotal value in Arab culture. In our age, there have been recurrent military coups in the Arab world, in a struggle for power, but not in an attempt to bring about a change for the better. Each successive regime is worse than its predecessor."

'Okaz: "Mr. Buleihi, haven't you read in the history of your people about hundreds of scholars who had significance and impact and whose lives are studied to this day, even though they possessed no power, tribe, or religious affiliation, and who are valued for their scholarship?"

Buleihi: "This is a general statement which is not backed by fact.

Arab history, with the exception of the period of the rightly-guided Caliphs, was dominated by politics. When the Fatimids took over Egypt and North Africa, these areas became Shiite, and when Salah Al-Din Al-Ayyubi [i.e. Saladin] put an end to the Fatimids, he drove out everything that had any relation to Shiism. The same happened when the Safavids converted Iran to Shiism, which then led the Ottomans to act the same way [in imposing Sunnism]. Thus Arab history, or Islamic history, in the wider sense, is the outcome of political ups and downs..."

"Those Exceptional [Arab] Individuals Were Not the Product of Arab Culture, But Rather Greek Culture... We Don't Deserve to Take Pride In Them, Since We Rejected Them and Fought Their Ideas"

'Okaz: "Let me pause here for a moment. You are reducing Islamic history just to political history. Even Islamic political history for all its tragedies, is not as bad as you described it. You also overlook the scientific and cultural aspects of Islamic history, which created a great civilization even while Europe suffered under the rule of feudalism, the Church, ignorance, and backwardness."

Buleihi: "We have inherited certain clichés about our history and the history of other nations without reading our history critically and without reading the history of others fairly and objectively. The luminous Greek civilization emerged in the sixth century BC and reached the peak of its flourishing in the fifth century BC. In other words, Greek civilization emerged many generations before the Islamic one, and Greek philosophy was the source from which Muslim philosophers derived their philosophy.

Those individuals in whom we sometimes take pride, such as Ibn Rushd, Ibn Al-Haytham, Al-Razi, Al-Qindi, Al-Khawarizmi, and Al-Farabi were all pupils of Greek thought. As for our civilization, it is a religious one, concerned with religious law, totally absorbed in the details of what Muslims should do and shouldn't do in his relations with Allah and in his relations with others. This is a huge task worthy of admiration, because religion is the pivot of life. We must however recognize that our achievements are all confined to this great area. Let us not claim then that the West has borrowed from us its secular lights. Our culture has been and continues to be absorbed with questions of the forbidden and the permitted and belief and disbelief, because it is a religious civilization...

'Okaz: "They [the Muslims] learned from the Greek civilization and this is not a fault, this is the way young civilizations are, they learn from previous civilizations and build upon them. Is it expected that they should have abolished the achievements of the Greeks and started from zero?"

Buleihi: "I am not against learning [from others]. What I wanted to clarify is that these [achievements] are not of our own making, and those exceptional individuals were not the product of Arab culture, but rather Greek culture. They are outside our cultural mainstream and we treated them as though they were foreign elements.

Therefore we don't deserve to take pride in them, since we rejected them and fought their ideas. Conversely, when Europe learned from them it benefited from a body of knowledge which was originally its own because they were an extension of Greek culture, which is the source of the whole of Western civilization."

Derek And Clive Tackle a Conundrum.

Clive: "From beginning to end, the Soviet product of political correctness sodden left liberalism is one big 'effing suicidal contradiction, Derek. It's such a very old load of unbelievably back-dated bollocks, that most lefties have to take enormous amounts of bleeding drugs to not only understand any of it which can't be done, but to believe and personally act on even a single shred of it. Thus their greatest wish is to convince every dissenter by force and state controlled conformity via intimidation and violence. Such phony baloney and moral vanity driven fraud can only be swallowed whole, if like a drug addicted whore in a toilet, one disguises the true flavor of morally and rationally going down, with ample helpings of cough syrup. This dear Derek, is the true face of left liberal smiley faced fascism".

Derek: "They're all arseholes!"

Clive: "Exactly, Derek".





Derek [on piano]: “Oh, John Pilger came into the lav to film his latest doc. ‘Ee said I need more bleeding funding, so can I suck your cock!”

Clive: “It’s a funny coincidence that you should mention John Pilchard, the avid fan of all things Marxist and nihilist thus deemed er, “progressive” Derek, because I never think of him. A progressive is someone who develops ever more acceptable versions of the exact same thing by simply changing the name.

The non-religion that is trying to kill us all and invariably is offended or threatens violence at any criticism of their murderous antics, is a religion of er, peace. Conversely the Judeo Christian faith that is the basis of our enormous free flow of ideas, choice and innovation, freedom and prosperity of capitalist democracy, free speech and natural rights [and ironically your homosexual right not to be killed by Islam] is called intolerant. 

Thus as they say at the peoples cube, truth telling is now hate speech and hate speech = sensitivity training. Targeting terrorists = indiscriminate murder of civilians, indiscriminate murder of civilians = resistance to imperialism.Destruction of the family = social progress. Clinical paranoia = outstanding film making. Free country = oppressive regime, oppressive regime = workers' paradise. Electoral process = failing democracy, Socialist dictatorship = will of the people. Export of capitalist democracy = imperialist war for oil, export of communist revolution = true democracy.  

Terrorists = freedom fighters, freedom fighters = imperialist occupiers, rapists and murderers. Rambling communist thug = idealistic romantic dreamer, hard-working productive individual = corporate fascist. Lowering standards = raising awareness, degeneracy = striving urban culture, and so on ad nauseum, Derek”.

Derek: “What if I said comfortable, unchallenged, phony, leftist radical arsehole?”

Clive: “Pilchard!”

Derek: “Oh, George Negus came into the bog to interview Hamas, they had a lot of inane laughs and George Needless kissed some arse!”

Clive: “Very good. You’ve finished. Now don’t call us, and we’ll never call you.

Now I don’t know if you’ve ever noticed the latest conundrum regarding the mentality of the average dhimmie leftard arsehole prick vomit bag, when it comes to the utter joy and light of Islamic terror, Derek?

As you know, I would never be so un-pc as to call a thing exactly what it is. No, circular wanking and denial is the way to go. Anyway Derek, have you had any contact with the people of whom I speak?”

Derek: “You mean your bog-standard apologist and Jew-hating mob loons of the left? All the fucking time, mate! They're always in my fucking bog! Always raving about "I need more government funding! More taxpayer gravy! Where are my bulging checks from the Melbourne Age, Green Left Retarded Socialist and the New York Times? And please cut my fucking head off cos’ I love it! They're 'orrible!”

Clive: “Exactly. There’s a curious contradiction that shows that their entire allegedly tolerant position regards Islam is an irresponsible fraud”.

Derek: “They’re all full of shit, mate!”

Clive: “Positively bursting. Well, this it how it works when you are stupidly determined to tolerate the intolerant vis a vis Islam. Anyone who says they are a Muslim is ipso facto a Muslim and their faith, Islam is untouchable by mirth or critique of any kind by us Infidels and filthy Kafirs, except in the er, positive”.

Derek: “I love the light hearted cheer and the good will to all, the most!”

Clive: “Who doesn’t? And the screaming. Then as if by magic, the same people who we must be ever vigilant never to offend, can be deemed as “not real Muslims” by the same Left pricks who say they will then arrest you for saying something they don't like or on behalf of Muslims everywhere, for something they don’t like, from only a moment before. This is the pure joy of left liberal fascism today, Derek”.

Derek: “Bloody ‘ell! It’s all a little fucking neurotic and complicated innit? What kind of things offend many Muslims around the world then, Clive?”

Clive: “The things that offend many Muslims around the world today Derek, can be narrowed down to everything and nothing”.

Derek: “Lovely. Er, how can a Muslim go instantly from being a Muslim, to not being a "real" Muslim, Clive?”

Clive: “It’s surprisingly easy and there in lies the conundrum of the politically correct loser, as it were. A Muslim just has to act appallingly or kill someone and they are no longer a Muslim. At least until they stop killing and start complaining about people screaming as they're beheaded. And oddly, neither terrifying behavior nor murder is always seen as bad, per se. There are many er, "conditions" that can apply at any time to the religion of peace or else, but not really for anyone else. And they can change back again without any notice whatsoever too. Thus, it is technically impossible for a Muslim to ever set off a bomb, behead or murder someone, because..."

Derek: "They're naturally not real Muslims!"

Clive: " Exactly, Derek. So even if you don't know you're offending Islam by your mere Infidel or Jewish existence, you probably are.

Thus what happens is, that even though someone has been a Muslim all their life, and their entire family is Muslim going back generation after generation, and they go to the Mosque, they live in a Muslim community or state, they read the Koran, they dress and look like Muslims, they speak and eat like a Muslim and they say they are Muslims and may want to spread Islam globally by any means, exactly as Mohammad and the Koran clearly proscribes, no, no. The moment one cuts off a head and sets off a bomb, hey presto! The Western media, academia, governments, church leaders, celebrities and pop stars all decree as one “...but they are not real Muslims!” Amazingly, these people are yet to say this on a street corner in say Tehran, Riyadh or Cairo”.

Derek: “Why not, Clive?”

Clive: “Because many of the local Muslims would be real Muslims only up to a certain point. And I believe that exact point would be where they become not real Muslims as if by magic, and cut the real Infidels heads off”.

Derek: “That's a real puzzler, Clive! So, I guess Taoists, Hindu’s and Christians are not real whenever they do anything naughty then, too?”

Clive: “Oddly no. Taoists, Hindu’s and your cargo cultists, don’t really fit into the current lefts paradigm, so are largely invisible, though Christians do fit nicely. Just remember, when a Christian does something bad, they are always a real Christian, unless they do something good. Then they don’t exist. Yes, it’s a real conundrum, as you say”.

Derek: “Unless the conundrum cuts the heads off Christian school girls in Thailand because they're Christians and not Muslims, Clive?”

Clive: “Nope, such an orgy or relentless violence can be and is simply ignored. Remember they’re not real Muslims who have murdered over 150,000 people in Northern no-go zones of Thailand over the last twenty years”.

Derek: “Who did it then?”

Clive: “Oh, random and anonymous people who shall remain nameless, even though they look, sound, act, walk, talk and appear exactly like Muslims. It could have been Hawaiian Anglicans or animists from Toronto. Nobody knows, Derek, nobody knows. Even though not real Muslim jihadist groups have repeatedly declared it was them and they want to kill all non-believers. This is a mere incredible coincidence spread over decades. According to our elitist betters, its hate speech churned up by Asian journalists reporting the empirical facts. Facts are no excuse for speaking the truth, Derek. So remember, there are 1.2 billion Muslims in the world, but none of them are doing any of the mountains of atrocity you can see everyday”.

Derek: “Who is?”

Clive: “Someone else, Derek, it’s always someone else. And it pays to remember that. Or else”.

Derek [on piano]: “Oh, Steve Bracks came into my room and sat upon me bed. He said I’ve passed a fucking anti-free speech law and now you’ll end up dead, oy!”

Clive: “Bravo! All together now! The natural totalitarian fascism of the left and Islam is always all for our own good! Now once more without the music and lyrics!”




[Here's over 350 five star reviews for Mark Steyn's great empirical paperback opus, America Alone: the end of the world as we know it. A returning best-seller for two years running! I should be so lucky.]

Cuban 'Revolution' lacks a laugh track. Part One.

Castro and Che in a pre-revolution conference huddle.

Castro: "You're stepping on my foot!"

Che: "I'm sorry comrade. I can be so insensitive!"


Revolutions appeal enormously to the ignorant hubristic teenage brat and grossly immature adult misfit because revolutions are well, essentially about murder, mayhem, theft, screaming and lies, while offering a thrilling chance to project a phony image of yourself entirely without merit or constructive effort. Thus affluent eternally tenured academics too, love to lecture about revolution to their agitprop by the numbers sodden black hearted delight. No really.

To incredible ad nauseum, said teen twerps and provisionally adult perverts often say to me that even if Che the child killer Guevara did murder people, steal their property and destroy everything he touched, ”which he didn’t man! Cos Che was a hero who just wanted to help people...and get rid of you evil fascist's!” er, neocons, BushHitler, Florsheim Shoes salesmen, tennis pros etc...well, it was “necessary” for the revolution and to er, “help people”, unless of course they were beyond help being already starved, drowned, tortured or shot to death.

Hey, is it OK if Che the child killer had have stolen your parents house, arrested and executed your folks as enemies of the revolution, so that your sister now works as a child prostitute, and you were say tortured to death for being a “long haired rock n’ roll musician” and your brother escaped to Miami on an inflatable giraffe? That’d be like, totally radical! Guess not.

Such eternal tantrum prone children as Mark Steyn said “live in a fantasy life completely supported by the system they despise.

But then Marxist Soviet product sodden radical left liberalism is in the very air we breathe. It’s everywhere. Beyond belief but true. Say you are a Marxist or socialist and few will say anything, even though they have murdered over 100 million human beings and CONTINUE to oppress and murder millions. No one can say they’re a Nazi and get a shrug of the shoulders or a pat on the shoulder and “cool! Kill BushHitler!”

Thus education, mainstream media, celebrity, pop music, entertainment and the government are riddled with them, all with identical phone ‘em in opinions based often entirely not on actual empirical reading of facts but on reacting to single words and one and three word slogans, like a Pavlov experiment in which the subject is swallows International Socialist pamphlets whole. Go figure.

Gee, why do the mass left indoctrinated get hysterically attached to psychopathic totalitarian Marxist incompetents, narcissists and now Jew hating Islamofascists? Easy. They're trained to and it's for the phony rebel cred.

If for over fifty years much of our culture has deliberately used Marxist critical theory to undermine the ability of people to see the incredible historical fortune of being born in the kind of place that doesn’t suck, meaning the free capitalist democratic West, then naturally a hip young twerp will want to find some way to off set the subsequent self-loathing this engenders. And that criminally insane circus freaks like Che the child killer and Chavez are foreign and hate America and the Western Canon but don’t live in their affluent neighbourhood next door to them is well, perfect.

It’s a perfect set-up as it requires virtually zero lifestyle change and zero commitment, beyond emotional outbursts of leaden laughable leftist clichés, attending a few screaming riots with your fellow spoiled brats, buying a nice Che the child killer t-shirt and a Rage Against The Machine CD. All this is a great way to make other stupid unread friends and meet conceited snot nosed girls. No really.

When I witness how common this is and how perfectly the dominant left paradigms o’ junk have become cosy bedfellows with Islamofascist stealth and overt jihad, I can only conclude one thing. According to Newtons Third Law of Physics, we're all doomed. No really.

Che love, the love that dare's to speak its name, says almost everything you need to know about someone's mind or the lack there of.

The equation goes something like the following: If one thinks Che is a great and heroic role model, they’re the kind of person who is er, passionate, and equally immature. And being ah, passionate, are more inclined to value emotions and self-image over anything else, especially any easily dismissed Himalaya of empirical evidence to the contrary. Rather problematic but apparently not for them.

Thus such boobs believe in anything but the facts. For the excitable, volatile and morally vain, reality and truth can be quite a damper and well, a real drag. So there’s something hideous ‘bout Fidel the pig and Cuba Inc, kids. Everything! It's been a fifty year reign for the killer phony and uber bore and yet, like the day of the living dead that is the never dying 1960’s, and like The Blob, Fidel just expands and absorbs one useful idiot sycophant after another.

Maybe like the blob, Fidel and his ilk will be killed off when Global Warming is revealed to be the Global Socialism power, money and control grab con and lie that it is, as the temperature drops to a new cool period. An authentic cool and one that doesn’t include wearing child murdering narcissist Stalinist commies on a free market t-shirt.





P.J O’Rourke once said that the only thing you need to know about Communism, is that for most or all of their respective histories, you couldn't get a decent Chinese take-away in China or a good Cuban cigar in Cuba.


Ah, Cuba. As Humberto Fontova the author of 'The Real Che Guevara: and the idiots who idolize him', and 'Fidel Castro: Hollywood's favourite Tyrant' has shown, the images of Che the child killer Guevara, Fidel El Pig Castro, and pre and post Revolutionary Cuba are wrong on almost every count. In the West this is so as it is in Hollywood, on almost any university campus and in the MSM etc, and among failed or successful killers, rapists and child prostitution aficionados. But then they see such totalitarian evil as good thang.



Er, a lot of regular and organised crime digs Cuba too, though I've already mentioned Hollywood. A clear objective view of Fidel's Cuban miracle is hard to find at Sunnyvale Sanatorium and Madhouse or any University, and Che naturally has a fan base in the Middle East and any African gangster cannibal state. Che is largely despised in South America by the mass of people, even in the few remaining dysfunctional led latin powder kegs etc. But Che is eternally popular with affluent liberal left whites, black identity politics race hustling criminals and various misfit minorities like MECHA and La Raza etc.

The rotten to the core lies and delusions of the liberal celebrity fan club for Che and his ilk’s revolutionary brain splattering machines, are delightfully perpetuated by literally millions of fashionably unread, ignorant and spoiled, free world phony rebels, and a chorus of dysfunctional grudge fantasy failed and failing states. [Here's a neat piece on the growing and terrifying duo of Che lovin' Chavez and Iran's Ahmachimphead.]


Via Humberto Fontova: 'Every third male in Miami has the same background of having his family and friends murdered, all property stolen and being the lucky one to have escaped alive. Castro sent his agents to torture to death American POWs in North Vietnam's Cu Loc POW camp outside Hanoi, in 1967'.

“The black is indolent where as the European is forward looking”. Che.

“If the missiles [nuclear] had remained in Cuba, we would have use them against the heart of the United States, including New York City”. Che.

For fifty years the "right on!" revolutionary scene of Fidel, Che and Cuba, have been pushed along nicely by bad TV shows and even worse films and docos. Dross that has perpetuated Che as a delight, and assumptions of Latinos as not having the same aspirations and abilities as say, you and l. Nope, they apparently need a uniquely experimental and shocking solution to their problems, not like er, us. It’s as if for some, certain nation states can only be comprehended as being almost entirely and naturally comprised of people straight from Central Casting.

“We need a coupla million latinos to cheer for Che and their own firing squad, pronto!”

When it comes to national and international disgrace and scandal, bogus attitudes to Cuba, especially in the clueless MSM and celebrityville, are the real deal and a monstrous scandal.

Humberto Fontova: "A Cuban gentleman named Pierre San Martin was also among those jailed by the gallant Che. A few years ago he recalled the horrors in a El Nuevo Herald article. "32 of us were crammed into a cell" he recalls. "16 of us would stand while the other sixteen tried to sleep on the cold filthy floor. We took shifts that way. Actually, we considered ourselves lucky. After all, we were alive. Dozens were led from the cells to the firing squad daily. The volleys kept us awake. We felt that any one of those minutes would be our last".

"One morning the horrible sound of that rusty steel door swinging open startled us awake and Che's guards shoved a new prisoner into our cell. His face was bruised and smeared with blood. We could only gape. He was a boy, couldn't have been much older than 12, maybe 14.

"What did you do?" We asked horrified. "I tried to defend my Papa," gasped the bloodied boy. "I tried to keep these Communist sons of bitches from murdering him! But they sent him to the firing squad".

Soon Che's goons came back, the rusty steel door opened, and they yanked the valiant boy out of the cell. "We all rushed to the cell's window that faced the execution pit, " recalls Mr San Martin. "We simply couldn't believe they'd murder him!"

"Then we spotted him, strutting around the blood-drenched execution yard with his hands on his waist and barking orders: the gallant Che Guevara." Here Che was finally in his element. In battle he was a sad joke, a bumbler of epic proportions [For details see the book Fidel; Hollywood's Favorite Tyrant.] But up against disarmed and bloodied boys he was a snarling tiger.

"Kneel Down!" Che barked at the boy.

"Assassins!" We screamed for our window. "Murderers! How can you murder a little boy?!" "I said kneel down!" Che barked again.

The boy stared Che resolutely in the face. "If you're going to kill me," he yelled. "you'll have to do it while I'm standing! Men die standing!" "Cowards, murderers, son of bitches!" The men yelled desperately from their cells.

"Leave him alone!" How can...?! "And then we saw Che unholstering his pistol. It didn't seem possible. But Che raised his pistol, put the barrel to the back of the boys neck and blasted. The shot almost decapitated the young boy.

"We erupted. We were enraged, hysterical, banging on the bars. "Murderers! Assassins!" His murder finished, Che finally looked up at us, pointed his pistol, and Blam, blam, blam!, emptied his clip in our direction. Several of us were wounded by his shots."

To a man (and boy), Che's murder victims went down in a blaze of defiance and glory. So let's recall Che's own plea when the wheels of justice finally turned and he was cornered in Bolivia. "Don't Shoot!" he whimpered. "I'm Che! I'm worth more to you alive than dead!" This swinish and murdering coward, this child-killer, was the toast of the Oscars".

The many hypocrites of Hollywood have assisted enormously and enthusiastically in all this and quite traditionally too, considering Tinsel Towns long, deep history of happy partnerships with the Mafia and other organised crime. The same hopelessly crude, violent and sentimental Mafia goombahs who preyed on Cuba pre the revolutionary disaster, have worked freely among the many shallow, relentlessly self-indulgent and decadent creeps of Bel Air, way before and all during the current ongoing Cuban murder spree.

So many Hollywood names have feted and received a cheery kickback holiday of thanks in the other Cuba, the one without firing squads and with imported Champagne, that one could throw up continuously all over the carpet of a rich celebrity Lear Jet. Pity the poor cleaner.

"Yukka, Mr Hollywooda! How do I getta out a so many a stains? First a cocaine, then booze and cum, and now ah the vomit!"

It's very complicated, Doctor. It's affluent people having a tedious guilt about their affluence, and the fortunate recipients of the benefits of capitalist democracies, finding that this just doesn't sit so well with their wished for rebel image. It's hard to hold a grudge and maintain the pose of struggle when you've got more than enough of nearly everything.

So, just make it all up and find a safe false enemy such as your folks, any US President, but preferably and almost always Republican, affluence in general or the price of cheese. It really doesn't matter. At every G8 protest rally cum violent riot, it's a sea of unresolved parental issues and a free for all festival of the disingenuous, the immature and the morally inverted.

After doing even a small amount of easily available research on Hollywood history and its often ugly, peculiar and fashionable attitudes, how can anyone decent ever respect a lot of these people and beyond their often mediocre, repetitive specialties, find them in the least bit interesting? Hey, it's not just Hollywood films either. It's the same for much of the alleged creative classes, baby. You can apply the same test to many celebrities, musicians and writers etc. They nearly all seem to love a nice Che T to enhance what is often a thin rather tawdry image.

And it’s not just my image that’s tawdry. Hey we're all human, even agents, but these people have real power, influence and opportunity and an incredible platform in which to indulge themselves and they usually do.

Don't get me wrong. I like a lot of Hollywood films and even some of the people, especially the technicians. I'm the same as any other movie fan. But boy, when delving deeper into the shallows, the dishonour roll is rather long, eh? Celebrities have in their usually ignorant, lazy and research free zone babbled on for almost fifty years with a sickening mix of delusion, out and out lies and mutual narcissism in the strange corrupt cult of celebrity complicit revolutionary Cubanism.

The sometimes appealingly pretentious tick prone Johnny Depp is just crazy about Che, about whom Depp seems to know fuck all factual. Nope, it's just a romantic dream for our faux rocker and rebel. Well, cream dream on, wimp boy.


"Had Johnny Depp been born two decades earlier [and in Cuba], if he attempted the lifestyle of a U.S. teenager or campus rebel his "digging" would have been of a more literal nature. Depp would have found himself digging ditches and mass-graves in a prison camp system inspired by the man glorified on his little pendant. Had his digging lagged, a "groovy" Czech machine-gun butt might have shattered his teeth or perhaps some "groovy" Soviet bayonets slashed his buttocks.

Hugo Chavez recently labeled his regime's socio-economic model, "Mission Che Guevara." As I write Chavez' police goon squads [some mimicking their national leader by wearing Che t-shirts, as visible on Youtube], bludgeon, tear gas and arrest hundreds of rebellious college and high-school students. Nothing could be more fitting."

For a dictator, nothing could be more fitting than a Che t-shirt! And these students can find zero “solidarity” with any Western student movement of support, cos there is none.

Via Humberto Fontova: "In a famous speech in 1961 Che Guevara denounced the very "spirit of rebellion" as "reprehensible." "Youth must refrain from ungrateful questioning of governmental mandates" commanded Guevara. "Instead they must dedicate themselves to study, work and military service."

And woe to those youths "who stayed up late at might and thus reported to work [government forced-labor] tardily." Youth, wrote Guevara, " should learn to think and act as a mass." "Those who chose their own path" [as in growing long hair and listening to Yankee-Imperialist Rock n' Roll], were denounced as worthless "lumpen" and "delinquents." In his famous speech Che Guevara even vowed, "to make individualism disappear from Cuba! It is criminal to think of individuals!"

Tens of thousands of Cuban youths learned that Che Guevara's admonitions were more than idle bombast. In Che Guevara the hundreds of Soviet KGB and East German secret police STASI "consultants" who flooded Cuba in the early 60's, found an extremely eager acolyte.

By the mid 60's the crime of a "rocker" lifestyle or effeminate behavior got thousands of youths yanked off Cuba's streets and parks by secret police and dumped in prison camps with "Work Will Make Men Out of You" in bold letters above the gate. The one at Auschwitz' gate read: "Work Will Set You Free", with machine gunners posted on the watchtowers. The initials for these camps were UMAP, not GULAG, but the conditions were much the same.

Today the world’s largest Che Guevara image adorns Cuba’s headquarters for its KGB-trained secret police. And Johnny Depp seems delighted to flaunt this emblem from his pendants, shirts and kerchiefs". Fontova.

Yep, it's a Havanawood party in Cuba for a lot of celebrities, and Hollywood is a cool source of La-La Land polished propaganda for Fideliano. Cuba is great way for stars to get their right on rebel badge accreditation via a completely fake and dead revolution.

Well, they're only helping to maintain the half century crushing of anonymous Cubans, so who's to know? Almost no one, especially not in most of the MSM. And with such immoral lack of judgement, you wonder why so many movies are so very bad? What else would you get from immensely spoiled and privileged people whose main occupations are forever amplifying their own reflections via the creation of fantasy worlds, drug taking and getting laid?

Jack Nicholson said of Castro: “He’s a genius. We spoke of everything”. Of cabbages and Kings no doubt?

Kevin Costner said meeting the killer was: “An experience of a lifetime”. Movie wise, Costner is mostly remembered and still rides on the same one experience of his lifetime from about fifteen years ago. I should be so lucky.

Harry Belafonte’s anti-US rants and pro Castro boot licking is broadcast unbelievably from Havana State Radio. Unbearable boredom FM on your dial. It's interesting that Harry does seem to always return to the evil United States? But Belafonte couldn't possibly be a phony and a hypocrite, right?

No mention by Harry Bellalugosi that while Batista had eleven prisons in total, Castro now has three hundred! There were over four thousand firing squad executions without trial in the first three years of the er, revolution, and around two thousand of those were ordered by the lovely Che.

"Che's life is an inspiration for every human being who loves freedom", reckons Nelson Mandela. Right, and Mandela has done so much post Apartheid for South Africa, and to help the people of Zimbabwe and well, help Africa in general. Er, nope.

Ah, Nellie forgot to comment on the typical kind of useless imbecile er, leader, that curses the continent of Africa, described nicely in the er, Prime Minister of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki. For many years, Tab acted upon his belief that AIDS is not spread by HIV. Lot of protests at the deaths of millions of African people because of this kind of profound ignorance? Negative. Zilcho. Hey, Mandela is a living Saint and His miracles work in mysterious ways, right? I digress.

Steven Spielberg said meeting the Dictator was: “the greatest eight hours of my life”. For the worst eight hours of your life, go to the next Spielberg festival of sickening contrived sentimentality and mawkish shallowness: A Retrospective, and watch four of his films in a row.

Naomi Campbell opined that meeting the Debauched One was: “very spiritual” and “an inspiration”. So far no guy seems to have been as equally inspired by Naomi to stick around long-term.

Chevy Chase said: “Socialism works. Cuba might prove that”. None of his films have really worked regards quality and timelessness, have they?

Robert Redford asks Che's sister to approve his phony Motorcycle Diaries script. Spike Lee, Sidney Pollack, Oliver Stone, Woody Harrelson, Danny Glover, Shirley MacLaine, Alanis Morissette, Leonardo DiCaprio, Dan Rather, Ed Asner etc, etc, are all creepy and flaky fans of Fidel the creep, and have made various delightful endorsements of the old cigar sucker.

Old Bob Redford used Che's diaries for The Murder Cycle Diaries, with the crazy and perhaps not so marketable of Che's psycho rants of extreme violence, edited out by er, Fidel. Gee, I hope Bobby also submitted the script to Fidel for approval. Oh, he did! It just shows that the Golden Boy has still got that romantic touch.

Sara Lequerica De La Vega stated on UCLA Today, in an article titled "Che Show only glorifies ruthless killer", that the “The self-indulgence and frivolity of pampered Western pseudo revolutionaries, speaks clearly of their lack of critical objective analysis”. Mark Morano on CNSNews, titled an article "Critics Assail Fidel Castro’s Sickening Grip on Hollywood Celebrities".

The people who dig Che en masse, are perhaps never going to do any easily performed research about their sickening hero, because they don’t really want to know. Once you start examining and removing pieces in this particular house of left cards, you’ll have to keep removing the many other lies and fantasy’s that have made up their dreamscape for many, many tragic decades. It ain’t gonna happen, kids.

So they stay with the fantasy and defend it ever more from any evidence whatsoever. And there's plenty of company worldwide for 'em, with the millions of stubbornly deluded and curiously aggressive fans of Che the shit. But hey, that's a cool t-shirt ya wearin'! You must be a real rebel and a champion of the people!

Gotta be.

Where Has Everybody Gone?

Chuck: "Hey Big Brother, how's your ass?"


[Originally posted on the great Copious Dissent a week ago. This post is slightly modified.]


“Tolerance becomes a crime when applied to evil”.
Thomas Mann.

”One of the greatest blessings of living in America is our First Amendment, which protects the right of all of us to speak out without facing government persecution. People in other countries, even strong Western democracies, are not as fortunate.

The French government, for instance, is prosecuting 73-year-old former film goddess Bridget Bardot for criticizing the ritual [Islamic] slaughter of sheep in a 2004 letter to Nicholas Sarkozy, now France’s president”. From Projo.

Man, in Australia regards the true freedom of the US Constitution via the First and Second Amendments, they were never really around downunder much if at all in the first place. Because dear reader, a few of the fundamental rights we had have been able to be modified down and virtually without a squeak. Are we men or mice? "Waiter! I'll have some more cheese!"

So it's a funny thing to have over an eighteen month period, an epiphany about your own country mine being the very, very far away land of Oz and to completely realise that there is apart from a few scattered columnists, blogs and the rare and isolated radio program, entirely no public forum, voice or constitutionally guaranteed freedom of speech or expression of the kind found in America the Beautiful because it's free. And there's certainly no media place for the free expression of our true Australian character. No, really.

There is no freedom of speech if it’s conditional you know. There is also no longer any right to bear arms in Australia, thus we were disarmed by making the owning of guns criminal, [and by alleged conservative John Howard no less.] Now mostly criminals have guns. As is shown in every hell hole on earth disarming the populace is an essential step to the convenience of permanent control and firing squads.

Hey, I don’t want to overstate my case. That would be silly and well, hyperbole. Things are only getting worse incrementally so it’s all really cool, eh? I believe that like the three saps of the Wizard of Oz, when it comes to defending and maintaining our own precious freedoms we too often lack the courage to act effectively, the heart to be angry in the first place and the brains to realise what this all means. If we allow ourselves to be boobs then we'll wake up one dark afternoon of the sol, but a much too late.

“Read, every day, something no one else is reading. Think, every day, something no one else is thinking. Do, every day, something no one else would be silly enough to do. It is bad for the mind to be always part of unanimity”. Christopher Morley.

In Australi, this largely non-existent freedom of speech is like a piece of rope whose length is pre-proscribed by the government and aided by our dreadful PC appalling and censorious, phony and uselessly leftard dominated MSM. In other words, I never need to say anything per se as one already knows exactly what one can and should say unless you want to be at best totally ignored, or at worst arrested.

Or is that at best arrested and at worst, totally ignored?

“In America, there are efforts, particularly on college campuses, to silence voices of dissent through the imposition of punishments for stirring bad feelings. But most citizens still seem to understand the Founders’ wisdom in crafting the First Amendment: A vigorous exchange of ideas helps us solve problems, and protects other freedoms. Without a First Amendment, government officials would move quickly to silence the spread of information they found inconvenient or threatening to their power”. From Projo.

As Mark Steyn has said, if you only believe in speech that you don’t find offensive because you agree with it, then you don’t believe in free speech at all. No one has a right to not be offended. "Freedom is offensive". That's the point. I'm constantly offended by the control freak left radical frauds of the MSM, the current neo-faux socialist government of Australia, the Education and Indoctrination Department and the quality of coffee at chain stores. But that’s the way it is for the foreseeable future

Man, I never get tired of quoting both the Steyner and P.J O'Rourke. If only they felt the same!

Oh, I get it. Referencing Mark again there is a kind of unspoken 'Gentleman’s Agreement' on whom and what cannot be criticised, examined or analysed. With rather clear guidelines on how this narrow censure is reported and sold to an often clueless public. It can folks mostly be filled in blindfolded and usually is.

“When everyone is against you, it means that you are absolutely wrong, or absolutely right”. Albert Guinon.

To expect any significant or other event overseas to be reported in our dull and duller Oz MSM with any brave insight or mature skill is laughable. Jeremiah Wright’s fraudulent, insane, bigoted and mediocre ramblings are presented here as mere “criticism of America”. Riiight.

So it's like criticism of the weather then or the tax code, or perhaps wine in certain regions of the Napa Valley? They’re all just er, “criticism” of America, right? What has happened is that as one gradually falls away from the grip and distractions most of our local media and the dominant zeitgeist thang it maintain. One also tends to read a hell of a lot more and do most research online, even bookstores and the library. Today online is almost the only truly Democratic source as it's open to cross-referenced critique.

I love my local library, but the day they employ someone who is not of the as per usual left liberal persuasion I’ll propose to Alec Baldwin. What I’ll propose, I cannot say. There is a same disease of the PC and "right on!" at most book stores, either independent or creep chains like Boredoms Books. But I digress.

This is an exact extract of the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act 2001. SECT 8. Religious vilification unlawful. 8. Religious vilification unlawful.

(1) A person must not, on the ground of the religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other person or class of persons.

Note: "engage in conduct" includes use of the Internet or e-mail to publish or transmit statements or other material. (2) For the purposes of sub-section (1), conduct-

(a) may be constituted by a single occasion or by a number of occasions over a period of time; and(b) may occur in or outside Victoria”.

Hey, nothing like setting up an environment with vast new holes of no-go zones in the already feeble and sclerotic public discourse, eh?

For "religion" invariably read as Islam and the upside-down denial of the harsh reality thereof...

In other words choose the right er, "religion" and you can wage cultural and literal war against the West largely unimpeded, nay, abetted and your empirical true sources, motives and modus operandi will be protected in a trust of threatened litigation and is therefore given legitimacy. This no matter how outrageous the empirical Himalaya of daily, historical and relentless evidence to the contrary.

All the sins of Islam, when they do finally come to the attention of law, are invariably seen as exceptions and er, "hijackings" of a fine ur, "faith." It’s ironic is it not, that the Tourets Syndrome of Western apologia is always saying that Islam has been hijacked by frauds? Quite, but no. They’re always real hijackers.

Basically, for writing the empirical truth as I do about Islam, I’m breaking an interestingly fascistic control freakery law. This is the beginning and the end of why I wish to leave our sunny land and move to America, even with all its murdering illegal immigrant's and Alec Baldwin included.

My Japanese wife used to live in New York and it would take us maybe half an hour to pack for Texas. Maybe we should emigrate on a jihadist economy free pass via Tijuana? Twelve million illegals can’t be wrong. Hey, maybe I'll get one of those little toy dogs for the car and maybe some nice Mexican cowboy boots.

Colonel Neville: “No, I don’t want to buy a rocket launcher, pal. No, I don’t want to see pictures of your sister”.

Local businessman: “You want to see pictures of YOUR sister?”

“The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it”. George Bernard Shaw.

Colonel Neville.