Le Colonel Neville s’habille Tojours Pour le Diner. Semper Fi. Thomas Sowell: "There are three questions that I think would destroy most of the arguments on the left. The first is compared to what? The second is at what cost and the third is what hard evidence do you have?” Live free or die or both. Satirical empirical conservative. No, really.
The great, empirical and free Mike Savage on why we must get armed. You cannot rely on the government to protect you. There is no government when it comes to terrorism. Terrorism can be anywhere, everywhere and at anytime.
Now dig this, hepcats. Here's our own er, Australian alleged security leaders in all their incompetent, lying PC inglorious dishonour and dhimmitude. The National Security Hotline people are objectively boobs and their site is junk, and we are therefore logically doomed. Imagine an alleged government security agency that helps our enemy hide in plain sight, by refusing to even name them, and makes calling them by their true name an illegal act? Imagine no longer.
Mike Savage on Obama’s Attorney General Eric Holder, calls Americans “racists" and “cowards.” As you do if you’re part of Obama’s Marxist bigot and racist administration. “"Though this nation has proudly thought of itself as an ethnic melting pot, in things racial we have always been and I believe continue to be, in too many ways, essentially a nation of cowards," Holder said.” And how in the US, blacks can get free suport for their education and whites don’t. No really. That's identity politics, along with abortion and welfare, the three main pillars of Marxist sodden left liberalism a la Democrats.
“Here's an interesting tidbit guys and gals: In the last election..."Murder rate in counties that voted Democratic: 13.2 per 100,000 people Republican: 2.1 per 100,000 people."
Mike Savage on why vets suicide. Vets have a lower percentage of suicide and crime than the general populace. Maybe because they're real men and women. Could be.
Comment: I'm a Conservative and I drive a 1992 Dodge Shadow, are you gonna take that away from me Brian so some gang-banging, purse snatching, walking AIDS epidemic doesn't have to walk to the crack house and the liquor store--don't fucking think so my friend. Ilgeneralisimo.
Mike Savage update Pt 1 of 4 on La Raza[the race] Mexican pro-terrorist racist group and its VIP member Sotomayor. A disabled vet and pharmacist stops black armed robbers who attempted an armed robbery on him while menacing two women in the store.
“You sound like a Brezhnev era apparatchik giving the party line.” Or a Police Commissioner giving the dinner-party line.
Frances perpetual Muslim Intifadah and Marxist leftard loon riots now firmly in Australia. Imagine sitting in those houses powerlessly watching from your upstairs window as all this happening all around you and for years on end? I have done that. And the leftist PC multiculti policy’s of Australian authorities and elites, will guarantee it stays this way and continues on to its logical end. [More vids at the end of the post.]
“Mister city policeman sitting Pretty little policemen in a row. See how they fly like lucy in the sky, see how they run. I'm crying, i'm crying. I'm crying, i'm crying.”The Beatles I Am The Walrus.
Last night I went to an as per usual affable speech and slight PR drone on by the new Police Commissioner Simon Overland: over long, under par and over there in a chair. I’m sure he’s terrific per se. What do I know? But if the corny, distracting self-effacing regular guy Dad humour was lessened, the speech could have been a few blessed minute or two shorter.
The HUJ has six Nobel Prize winners. If you discount Yasser Arafat the mass murdering gangster, closet homosexual rapist and embezzler’s prize for er, “peace”, it’s the same amount that 1.2 billion Muslims have won, ever. 14 million Jews have produced 149 Nobel Prize earners. There was nice talk of how to achieve peace that was er, doubtful. The only way to peace is the same as in WWII. Crush the will of the enemy to fight, meaning Arabs and Muslims and destroy their political ideology which is Islam.
Thus outside of Israel, there is not a single world class university in the entire middle-east.
Yep, the cheerful and kinda unimpressive Chief made some practical and worthwhile points like do not leave anything in your car you boobs, and you can help to cut car related crime by 17%.
That Police have a “disconnect between how they see themselves, [less good] and how the public see them, [more good.]" Simon stated that he is “at all times fully accountable,” logically impossible though it may be, and that he was “not afraid to deal with the controversial issues.” A statement and not yet a result and it depends on how one defines controverstial, I believe.
All great, but community guidelines could have been mailed in. And what was the point of the meeting? Nothing really. Oh yes, he talked and we listened. Check. He sure was careful about the old Police Association, cos gee, I don’t think they were as sufficiently impressed with ex-Chief Nixon as Simon says he is. Fancy that?
[Here's the fabbo Miranda Devine on the wilful and criminal incompetence of those in power re: bushfires, the Greens and both party's.]
[And ere's a great slap in the face for the idiot powers that be, and the Green criminal's who killed 200 Australians with their policies and without charge, via mangledthoughts at rumcorp.]
The apparently worthy success of the Purana Task force was piped and the Cheef said “the public need to say that being drunk in public is not on.” Sounds great, but unless one is a drunkard I thought they already did. That's why we have Police...
Does he mean the powerless, culturally confused and demoralised, overregulated, not allowed to defend themselves effectively and totally unconstitutionally disarmed public? That one? Or maybe the one that has no core values as their values and enjoys adversarial nihilism violence and social decay? Or the host culture that is forced to import destructive and subversive alien cultures and attitudes for no good rational reason?
Gee, so why are the Police armed and with the power of the law behind them then, and that barely works? Gosh, cos banning guns DIDN'T take away any criminals guns like they said it would, just ours. Got it. The “people” say all kinds of gee, diverse things but who listens to the non-PC? No one. Simon said he was not “afraid to use necessary force.” Nice to hear. It’ll come in handy when we turn into France, Germany and Britain etc, while the Police are pre-occupied defending themselves and their families with cheap revolvers.
As for Simon’s non-hilarious lack of confidence building admission of his online inexperience and computing mediocrity, I’m sorry. While that may be amusing for Granddad, it ain’t so reassuring in a modern Police Chief. Dig? He goes “online for an hour a week [!]” to er, chat with members.
“Did catering send the six boxes of Krispy Crèmes to Christine?”
Wow, intense. Some very profound research and analysis is going down in Cheap of Police land. Yeah, my email will get answered personally. I know it. Maybe he has a Go Team that handles all that? Then the team needs new pom poms.
The mathematics of why no one effective will probably ever get a serious chance to hold Sy the pie in the sky guy or anyone in power up to any prolonged empirical probing, are simple.
They will speak when it suits them and the least difficult looking people such as the addled and other journalists will then get to share three or so feeble questions, if ever. If by some incredible mistake somebody with the intellect, spine and insight throws a rhetorical spike worth a damn, they’ll be unlikely to get a concrete answer to anything, except maybe their worst fears.
The gasping pointless diplomacy of polite avoidance, subject change and logical fallacy are not my idea of a good time.
To be honest, my heart kept on pounding through a lot of the whole rather deluded and actually unpleasant evening. No really. What’s weird is that no matter how many times I see what those with power are like in the media, when you see them in person and they’re the same er, drag, it’s actually quite shocking.
It's a toss-up which is more likely to guarantee a business as unusual waking nightmare: people who are actually sincere and believe in PC bunk and for their dreaded good intentions, or those who are just plain crazy, dangerous and phony. And that’s the problem.
After decades of indoctrination via the very air we breathe, most everyone has absorbed the fraud of left ideology as mainstream and cannot conceive of thinking outside of it. I find for many the questions never even occur. Nope, for the PC infected it’s always the fault of those that still have the rational ability to simply ask for gee, evidence.
I imagine if you meet Simon he’s a nice enough guy, which sadly means precisely nothing. The fact is, these are the people in charge, and they do seem to have startling blank areas. And he came over as well, not that sharp. Not as fully rounded as Christine Nixon, but...
"I say, I say there! That boy's about as sharp as a bowling ball!"Foghorn Leghorn.
Now my questions[link to drsanity] would’ve been oh I don’t know perhaps rather Mark Steyn, Robert Spencer and Bat Ye'or such as:
What are two books apart from the Koran that you’ve read on Islam and terrorism? What titles have you read on American, European and Asian geopolitics and our own heritage? What online analysis sites do you frequent? What journals, magazines, newspapers and books do you and have you read?
Do you accept and understand that the majority of Islamic states and a significant proportion of Muslims in those states and in the West are rabid anti-Semites and that they want enthusiastically to murder all Jews? Do you know that this is what Mohammad taught and practiced and what is written in the Koran?
How is it a good thing to have so many major political and media figures that are radical Marxist, left Labour, Union and Greens Pro-Palestinian/Hamass/Hezbollah anti-Semitic fellow travellers, giving vocal, logistical, legal and financial support to mass Jew hatred and anti-Western criminality in the centre of Melbourne?
Is it good that the majority of the media, government and even the Police have ignored, lied, covered for and manipulated the truth of these events and movements?
Is it of concern that most of those in power are either uninterested, say nothing, are fearful or lie about this?
Does multiculturalism have any innate limits or flaws and what are they?
Why won’t the utter abasement to Islam, and the crushing and terrifying failure of Muslim integration in Europe, Britain and everywhere else with Muslim immigration, not happen in Australia?
How much political ideology of the left exactly, is sufficient to run a Police force and the government?’ Apparently it’s never enough...
A friend of mine got up and showed the infamous non-MSN photo of the junior jihadist Nazi Muslim poster child at the Jew hating Muslim and Marxist killers festival. She noted how Simon had kind of responded as if it’s an isolated event, with the formula directive of B12/A I believe..“We have forward your concerns to the appropriate channels.”
This usually translates as somewhere on the outer rings of administrative Venus. So you can expect an exciting form letter within the next decade. Yep, she was like most lay people and nervous and was told to er, “sit down..”, along with the classic unfulfilled tactic of “let him answer!” Nope, he didn’t. Unless..
Please select one of the following and wait..and wait:
“I am shocked. Shocked. Of course I condemn any such behaviour, actions, attitudes, zebras. We are addressing this issue, excellent question cos we all know the answer already, we will come down hard on people who are not too frightening, I’d direct you the correct channels, golf is the thing, and I like bananas...” Etc.
And my friend didn’t get her photo and form letter back! Gee, it just disappeared. Like that. Ah, trust and competence. Outstanding. "Theft at Police conference! Ripper strikes again!"
So sports, no honest debate is due any time soon in Australia, in fact probably NEVER. No really. Not one where anyone worthy will make a sustained, cohesive and very public case. Sure, questions that merely require the same techniques of official offal brush-off that kinda make ya feel weird for pointing out the bleeding obvious that nobody else does but you..
“Purge the anti-group thinker! What’s wrong with you? Racist! Fascist!” Yep, by default.
A Groundhog Day waste of time that condemns us to watching ineffectively as Australia takes maybe five to less than ten years to become like Britain and Europe, by following virtually the same Marxist product sodden multiculti left policies.
It’s damn easy to discount the average untrained citizen. The chances of a reporter asking a burning elephant sized question that needs to be asked are about zero. In fact there is no serious and effective voice or forum for the people at all, and definitely not in the Australian media. Everybody just sat there and applauded as Simon made some available anywhere standard points while providing thrilling Police administration updates.
The glaring irony never seemed to strike Simon as he talked on and on about protecting the whole community, when outside this largely Jewish meeting in the middle of Caulfield on a Monday, they have to have armed guards and metal detectors because of the er, Buddhists and Anglicans?!
Nope. The Muslim and Marxist loons we must never mention, except to apologise for and rationalise away. Si made required and absurd PR claims for the previous Police Commissioner Christine Nixon. Apparently Chrissie was “significant” according to the new egghead of law enforcement.
Hey, any photo of Christine Nixon doing her Marlon Brando in drag routine will verify that. She was “connected with the community” said King Q ball. Hopefully that’s not the dead community under her beady eyed watch, but clearly the Police catering community helped create an enormous part of Chrissie or two. I never knew it, but Chris provided “strong leadership and effective management.” Sorry, I guess I was just thrown by all the incompetence, resignations and terrifying crime.
Sadly Mr Overland, the new head plod, said a major part of his policy will be “enforcing crime [!]” I believe it! Without correcting himself or seemingly noticing his gaff, he added reassuringly that “that sort of approach will continue.” Well, why not. Fabulous then. What could go wrong?
So plenty more sacrificing law and order to PC multicultism; continued police demoralisation and high levels of resignation; squads of dead gangsters; nights of city wide urban mayhem; Police taking part in gay parades while the law continues to turn up around 40% of the time, while keeping wilfully clueless minds and hands off growing Muslim stealth jihad and so on ad nauseum. Carry on then. Got it.
Simons kept to the respectable dirty laundry list of mass PC leftardism that falls without fail and so evenly across those in charge. Ticked ‘em off one by one as he displayed a rather disconcerting wide eyed Pavlovian belief in Global Warming. He did. According to our head skinhead, there’s “no doubt” that GW is causing all the extreme weather and I kid you not, “the bushfires.” Balls.
Funny. Which court was that proven in? The Supreme Court? The Melbourne Tennis Court?
No, the court of the laughable mainstream media, anything to be elected government, eager for GW gravy funding academics and easily manipulated and incurious public opinion. What an embarrassing joke to see the guy in charge of our security and civil order babbling such bunko scams. Stick within your brief and curriculum, kid.
And big surprise, he’s against zero tolerance. I’ve noticed. Apparently so the Police can use er, "discretion.” Yes, perhaps like being beyond belief lenient, while totally ignoring and lying about and manipulating crime figures for say, over a decade of Lebanese Muslim and black gang crime et al?
Hey, or not charging black rapists of white females so we can all continue to celebrate diversity undisturbed by reality. Gotta work. It’s worked so well in Britain, Holland, Sweden and France. No.
Yep, I had a few enlightening and disturbing little chats with the local Police Chief, various Constables and Detectives when I lived above my unfortunate café in a multicultural Policing experiment known as "across the river." The salons included those serving and those who resigned in frustration, disillusionment, disgust and fear. There’s nothing worse than harsh facts for spoiling a visit to an ethnic restaurant.
Ah, and maybe letting thirty cars of violent armed Muslims do as they please for three days after Cronulla. Oh, I forgot. Victorian Police are um, different. Check and nuance. I'm sure they are.. Yes, nothing to see here. Discretion. All very hush hush.
Or maybe outside my cafe, the Police letting the last remaining Maori go after he and his three friends attempted to murder a skinny white guy by slashing his chest open and jumping on his head. Say goodbye so fifty odd Maoris’ don’t ransack the Police station later I imagine.
Or maybe letting 70 to 120 black Africans riot and fight at an intersection in Footscray from 2200 on a Saturday night until 0600 Sunday morning and not a Police officer in sight. Gee, I called about five times, and not once for pizza!
Or indeed allowing Footscray in it’s entirety for over twenty years. Go figure. What do I know? Probably equal to my efforts and curiosity, eh?
Ah, or how about the idea of assigning about five Policemen to watch over those 1500 plus Jew hating Muslims and Marxists freaks waving Hamass, Hezbollah and Soviet/Cuban flag shouting “Death to the Jews and Israel!”,“Smash Capitalism!” and “Destroy the West, America and Australia etc, etc”, ad nauseum.
My personal favourite, screeched by a young female leftard bint was "Israel and the USA, the biggest terrorists in the world today!"
Quite. And finally they all marched down Swanston Street screaming “Allah Akbar!” while waving enormous Hezbollah and Jihad flags. No really. Don’t worry. A lone motorcycle Policeman and two others on foot stood by and escorted them. Fab, eh?
Golly gee, the Police we spoke to and saw were clearly incurious, ignorant and semingly indifferent about what it all meant. Yes, how about that?
But then for the two hours I was there, the Police were not really paying attention, were they? The only squad car was facing away from the crowd and the officers inside were so adrift in apparent boredom, that they never apparently noticed the car of four Lebanese er, “youths” inside. The dear celebrators of multiculturalism and gang rape and assault asked me if I was Palestinian as you do. Their heartfelt junior jihadist enquiry was accompanied with the unmistakable leering signals and expressions that said, “if only you were in a quiet and empty street somewhere...”
We mentioned to one lone Bill, the wide range of variant 'death to the Jews and the West..' signs, and in particular, the one held by the Muslim seven year-old and her fully burked Mother that read ”The Jews never learn. They need more of this”, [with a tasteful picture of a swastika.]
He said that “the others will take it down [!] They won’t allow it!” Riiight, being all tolerant an’ all. Er, no. Virtually everyone agreed with it...that was the point of the whole rally. They all hate Jews and the free West! Hey, as authentic Muslim Hamass fans and Marxist misfits do.
It was like talking to well, regular and naïve, incurious, indoctrinated, intellectually and morally lazy unread people. Which I beleive I was. Which is nice for a hamster but not in law enforcement. Observing a dim copper is not a nice thing.
And so for our tough law enforcement and government authorities, what are they scared of exactly? Islam everytime, [I know I am] cos it get's violently "offended" by everything and nothing.
Yep, there's nothing smarter or braver than letting criminals try out the Broken Windows Theory and finding it’s often entirely on their side. No.
"Expert textpert choking smokers, Don't you thing the joker laughs at you? See how they smile like pigs in a sty, See how they snied. I'm crying.
I am the eggman, they are the eggmen. I am the walrus, goo goo g'joob g'goo goo g'joob. Goo goo g'joob g'goo goo g'joob g'goo." The Beatles I Am The Walrus.
Jew hatin’ Muslim circus geeks and Marxist trash on parade. Check out the goatee geek from the Islamic Council of Awfulness, and the fat broad with her phony tears for the poor Palestinians. For tiny Israel, nuttin’. Why are middle-aged Socialist Marxist leftards so unatractive? You know why. They're ugly inside too.
But there was lot’s and lot’s of terrorist kaffiyeh rags. Sadly these clips just don't give a tru feel of the overwhelming vile atmosphere and the hideous clichés at this delightful event. I guess ya had to be there to get the er, joke.
“I think the one of the wife with the Hezbollah flag came out nicely.” Aw, they edited out the screams of “Alluah Akbar!”
Dr Peter Slezak the self-loathing left Jew presents his uber-lies of Jew hatred! Go figure the leftard.
“It is also a lie, endlessly repeated by our politicians and media, that Hamass does not want to negotiate...striking evidence of Hamass’s GOOD FAITH and CONSIDERABLE RESTRAINT in face of the blockade.”
No really. That’s what this bastard says. Riiight. Oh, the Israeli’s “violated the ceasefire..” What a suicidal and disgusting shit bag.
Hey, looking like a wino at 3am as usual, here’s Michael Leunig, the elite National Trashbag, Jew hatred cartoonist, leftard neurotic and Hamass rally fellow traveller. Mike's a big fan of Al Jazeera. "Al, it was Al Jazeera all the time!" Hey, nine out of ten terrorist groups can't be wrong. Ain’t he so nice with his successful career in venal but respectable anti-Semitic and repetitive scribbling?
Now virtually drained of all wit and humour and with the light touch of a German jazz band, the Leunig paradigm is creepy, insanely addled, convoluted and weirdly backdated. Observe as Mike babbles on wilfully regardless of the Jew hating nihilism swirling around his fluffy head, cos Mike the twisted fuck has plenty of bilge swirling around in his own idiot disturbance.
Dig how the audience of radical circus freaks is largely indifferent and restless with Mike’s faux “sensitivity” until he makes a clear anti-Israel stab that is. What a laughable and repellent freak. "National Treasure" can apparently triple for prize wacko and an irrational disgrace.
The Real Srebrenica Genocide. All about the Bosnian Mujahadeen Islamo fascist mass murdering psychopaths and how they have spread Islam in Serbia.
Dear sports, here's the rest of Fridays miserable post.
In an honest and curious world based on empirical reason and moral values, Clinton would be charged with perjury, aiding the enemy, accepting criminal bribes, sedition, high treason, gross incompetence, dereliction of duty and serial rape.
Instead these classic er, "progressive qualities" of Bill the Slime and like Ted 'let the bitch drown' Kennedy, make them Democrat Party leftard liberal elitist heroes. Much as Bill 'balls out' Clinton's uber-narcissistic bookend wife, the brilliantly incompetent and sub-par henchwoman in crime, Brillary Pad Clinton. Go figure.
The Balkans, Yugoslavia, Croatia, Bosnia and Kosovo etc, etc, are one vast tangled mess of vipers and global super-lies.
To those most responsible for aiding and abetting the narco death Islamisation and Marxist product sodden dhimmitude of Europe and beyond, such as the bankrupt EU, the the spineless, deluded PC Socialist Euroweenie's of NATO, the Islamic and Communist geek dominated U.N, avid Oval Office wanker Clinton, the half-blind, self-abasing Blair and the doomed French and so on ad nauseum, I would never say fuck 'em all, cos we can't touch them; while they do as they please and not just to people far away but to us, America and the Anglosphere in general.
I hope to appear live on stage again as soon as possible to er, expound on just such topics a la P.J O'Rourke, Mark Steyn and Peter Cook etc. I should be so lucky. We shall see, sports...
"You'll be damned in Hell before I'm gone."Jim Morrison.
The True and Terrible History of Croat Muslim Nazi Ustashi Jihad crime and the SS Divisions of the Grand Fucking Mufti of Jerusalem..
BBC4 doco on the siege of Srebrenica, the fraud of U.N “forces” and the massacre of Muslim men and boys etc, Pt 1. The BBC? Are they reliable? Hahahahahaha. But one must be open without being like a sieve, to terrible and awkward truths as they often find us out, eh? And we're often dealing with ordinary people from all sides trapped in the middle of the nihilist madness of those with the power. Is this not so?
Sadly, the BBC and Muslim sources involved, lie and manipulate and continue to do so as a matter of policy, ideology, culture, tactic and strategy 24/7. Go figure.
How much of their product is pure bullshit? Clearly most of it so far, and yet...
[NOTE: About 18 months ago Nathan Pearlstein, Robert Peter North and Felix Quigley began educating Israpundit readers as to the truth about the fighting in Serbia. As a result we came to understand that the US was at fault and the Serbs were innocent.]
Introduction by Nathan Pearlstein:
Why are the mainstream Western media, the US administrations under George W. Bush and Bill Clinton as well as the governments of NATO and the EU covering up this monumental crime against humanity?
Why are the Serbs - whom apart from the Jews were the major victims of the Holocaust during World War 2 - being cast as the perpetrators of genocide while the real perpetrators of genocide - the Islamofascists loyal to Alija Izetbegovic - are being cast by the corporate media, the US, NATO and EU governments as “the victims”?
Why was Naser Oric - the Islamofascist commander of Srebrenica and perpetrator of a massive genocide against Serbian men, women and children in Srebrenica from 1992 to 1995 - given only a 2 year sentence for this monumental crime against humanity and allowed to walk free from NATO’s Scheveningen ICTY prison: the former Nazi SS dungeon for patriotic Dutch resistance fighters against the Germans during World War 2 in The Hague, Holland?
Our dear friend and colleague at 4International, Peter Robert North, has graciously allowed us to reproduce in full his outstanding work here on what really happened in Srebrenica and Gorazde from 1992 to 1995. A revelation of truth which is of enormous historical significance and importance to all good people across the globe but especially for all patriotic Jewish people in Israel and the diaspora.
We all remember the Western media hoaxes and fakery concerning the events in Jenin and Qana recently and how these media frauds were used to demonize Israel and the Jewish people.
So it is absolutely crucial that we also expose the Western media fraud concerning the events in Srebrenica, Bosnia in July, 1995, in order to reveal just how corrupt and dishonest the Western media, the US, NATO and EU Imperialist governments are when they turn the world upside down by demonizing the victims of a massacre in order to prop up the Islamofascist perpetrators, thereby creating new independent Islamist states for the Islamofascists (as the US, NATO and EU are doing right now in Kosovo on behalf of the Islamofascist terrorist group: the KLA).
The following article, my dear readers, is the horrific truth about what happened to the Serb civilians of Srebrenica and Gorazde - a shocking truth which the Fascist Left supporters of Hamas and PLO/Fatah, as well as the pro-NATO Imperialist cowards on British website “Harry’s Place” - especially Oliver Kamm and Marko Attila Hoare - are so desperate to hide from the people of the world.
The following is a dire warning to us all! We ignore this at our own peril”. The Real Srebrenica Genocide: The mass murder of Serbs in Srebrenica and Gorazde from 1992 to 1995 by Alija Izetbegovic’s Islamofascist terrorists.”
Colonel Neville: Ya wouldn't know the Balkans have been crawling with Arab and other Muslim scumbag psyhcopath jihadists for over a century or more now, would you? They are currently in plague prorportions and right in the heart of Europe[!], fully armed and in charge of the major EU drug conduit drug states of Kosovo and big juicy pieces of Croatia and so on. It's a delight. Oh yes, and fully aided by er, the Islamic and Communist dominated U.N, the Euroweenie decadents of NATO and er, our suicidal dhimmi alleged representatives.
This is what is known as supplying the rope to your own hanging.
My edit via hirhome com: "The exhaustive definition of the Islamic Order is: the unity of religion and law, education and force, ideals and interests, spiritual society and State...the Muslim does not exist at all as an independent individual...
The education of the population, and especially those media which have an effect on the public such as newspapers, radio, and television, must be entrusted to people whose good Islamic reputation, moral attitude, and intellectual ability are unimpeachable.
[...the very existence of non-Islamic systems is a violent affront:] "It is not in fact possible for there to be any peace or coexistence between ‘the Islamic Religion’ and non-Islamic social and political institutions..."
If there can be no peace or coexistence, then Islam is at war with all non-Islamic cultural and political institutions. And since 'institutions' do not exist apart from the people involved with them, this translates into a war against 'infidels', i.e. against non-Muslims - a jihad, or holy war.
"And combat on Allah’s path those who combat you, and don’t disobey. True, Allah does not love the disobedient! And kill them where you will find them; chase them from where they chased you: association is a graver sin than murder. But don’t fight them near the sacred Mosque unless they fight you there first. And if they fight you there, kill them then. Such is the retribution against infidels. Should they cease, Allah is, surely, forgiving and merciful."
Alija Izetbegovic, leader of the Bosnian Muslim faction backed by the US and NATO during Bosnia’s civil war. And the book he wrote, and from which all the lines quoted above were taken, is entitled "Islamic Declaration". (This is sometimes translated, "Islamic Manifesto").
He "heard" that some call Mr. Izetbegovic a fundamentalist? Was it a vague rumor? Remember, Izetbegovic reissued his book in 1990. There is no question that the diplomatic corps was aware of the book's contents. Moreover, as seen above, Izetbegovic had been famously imprisoned in Yugoslavia for several years precisely because of his writings and other activities meant to incite Islamist violence. None of this was a secret; everybody in Yugoslavia knew it, and it is stated in the preface to the French translation of his book (the one I have been using here).
And note Zimmermann's argument:
1) Fundamentalism is bad;
2) If Izetbegovic were a fundamentalist, that would be bad;
3) Therefore, Izetbegovic is not a fundamentalist.
This Alice-in-Wonderland logic translates:
1) The American public would rebel if the US government told them it was backing a fundamentalist (whose great hero, by the way, is the Ayatollah Khomeini);
2) It would be bad if the American public rebelled;
3) Therefore we will simply say that Izetbegovic is a moderate, and the truth be damned.
This became the position of the Western mainstream media, as I show in part 2 of this series. Almost without exception, the media -- and, I am afraid, many academics -- lied about the Izetbegovic regime, precisely as intended by US officials such as Warren Zimmermann.
Up next I show how the media went out of its way to paint fascists as victims, and their victims as fascists: the mainstream media turned Bosnia upside down”.
But it was Alija Izetbegovic, the leader of a minority Bosnian Muslim faction, the one that NATO supported, who wrote a book calling for the slaughter of infidels so that a Muslim takeover could install an Islamist theocracy in Bosnia (documented in Part 1, below).
This Alija Izetbegovic may have participated in the extermination of Serbs and Jews during WWII. After all, he founded at this time the Young Muslims in Bosnia, in imitation of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that was closely allied with the German Nazis.
This Alija Izetbegovic may have participated in the extermination of Serbs and Jews during WWII. After all, he founded at this time the Young Muslims in Bosnia, in imitation of the Muslim Brotherhood, an organization that was closely allied with the German Nazis.
HIR does not have materials to positively document Izetbegovic's participation in the WWII Nazi massacres in Bosnia. What is well documented, however, is that in the 1990s Alija Izetbegovic proudly recreated the SS Handzar Division that the Mufti of Jerusalem Hajj Amin al Husseini had earlier created, for the German Nazis, out of tens of thousands of Bosnian Muslim volunteers (documented in Part 2).
This [Muslim] SS Handzar Division eagerly participated in the slaughter of hundreds of thousands of Serbian, Jewish, and Roma (Gypsy) civilians. It is not unreasonable to propose that if Alija Izetbegovic was proud enough of the WWII SS Handzar Division to recreate it in the 1990s, then perhaps he was a Handzar soldier during the World War.
Once you get to know Izetbegovic, you are forced to ask this question: Isn't it more likely that the one killing innocent people in the 1990s was Izetbegovic, and not the Serbs? Yes. Consistent with this expectation, every allegation against the Serbs evaporates into nothing the minute one investigates.
The overwhelming, crushing bulk of the evidence supports the view that in the Yugoslavian civil wars of the 1990s the Serbs behaved much like did in WWII, when they were the staunchest defenders of the persecuted Jews in all of Europe.
The portrait that was painted of the Serbs in the 1990s as "the new Nazis" is not only false, it is absurd. For this reason, the lies we were told about the Bosnian Serbs (repeated to this day) have required spectacular hoaxes, knowingly perpetrated by the Western mass media. These are easily shown to be false with a minimum of research, as for example the accusation that the Bosnian Serbs were running death camps (refuted in Part 3).
The documentation you will encounter here raises the sharpest possible questions about the integrity of the mass media, and concerning the intentions of the Western powers that destroyed Yugoslavia.
Introduction: by Jared Israel, Emperor's Clothes (21 October 2003).
A few days ago, the Bosnian Muslim Fundamentalist (or, for short, Islamist) leader, Alija Izetbegovic, died of heart failure. The Iranian Foreign Ministry issued a statement praising:
"...the late president's serious attempts to defend the identity and territorial integrity of his homeland as well as the unity among the residents and various ethnic races of the country."[1]
The US State Department praised him as well:
"President Izetbegovic's personal courage helped the Bosnian people endure one of Europe's greatest tragedies since World War II. His determined leadership was instrumental in Bosnia and Herzegovina remaining a unified multiethnic country."[2] Note the similarity between the two statements. They might have issued from the same foreign office.
This may be surprising if you don't know that the Pentagon coordinated Iranian and Saudi military intervention in Bosnia, on the side of Izetbegovic, against the Bosnian Serbs and moderate Muslims. This included the importation of the worst Mujahideen cutthroats - they boasted that "we do everything with the knife" - to indoctrinate and train Izetbegovic’s army, and lead it in a campaign of terror.[3]
The State Department's reference to "Bosnia and Herzegovina remaining a unified multiethnic country" has one problem: Bosnia was never a country. It was an administrative unit within the internationally recognized state of Yugoslavia. Rather than protecting the multiethnic state of Yugoslavia, Izetbegovic’s fundamentalists fought to secede with the aim of creating an Islamist republic on this piece of Yugoslav territory. This was opposed by virtually all the Serbs and probably most Muslims. But it was backed by the US, Iran, Saudi Arabia and other Islamist states.
Despite the hype in the Western media, Izetbegovic was not fighting to affirm (let alone reaffirm!) some supposed Bosnian nationhood. Rather, he called for: "...the implementation of Islam in all fields of individuals' personal lives, in family and in society, by renewal of the Islamic religious thought and creating a uniform Muslim community from Morocco to Indonesia. ..."[4]
In other words, the Islamist takeover of Bosnia was intended as a step towards the creation of a unified Muslim world-state.”
The documentation you will encounter here raises the sharpest possible questions about the integrity of the mass media, and concerning the intentions of the Western powers that destroyed Yugoslavia.
Quite the opposite of preserving the nonexistent 'Bosnian nation'! And yet the fiction of a Bosnian nation, threatened by supposed Serb secessionists (the Serbs were in fact the people who didn't want to secede from Yugoslavia) was sold to ordinary people in the West.
The Iranian statement refers to Izetbegovic as a unifier among "the various ethnic races". I wonder, what on earth is an "ethnic race"? Sounds like something from a Nazi's dream.
That aside, was Izetbegovic aiming for unity? And if so, what kind of unity? Prof. Gil-White deals with those questions below.
1. Who was Alija Izetbegovic: Moderate Democrat or Radical Islamist?
Alija Izetbegovic is the Muslim leader whom the U.S. and NATO supported during the Bosnian civil war in the 1990s. The Western media and governments recognized him as President of Bosnia.
According to Newsweek magazine: "The government of Bosnian President Alija Izetbegovic...has always been committed to a multiethnic society."[5]
Knight-Ridder News Service stated that: "The Bosnian [Muslims] are struggling for democracy, human rights, and a multiethnic country."[6]
And Warren Zimmerman, former US Ambassador to Yugoslavia, wrote in Foreign Affairs: "Izetbegovic was...A devout Muslim but no extremist, he consistently advocated the preservation of a multinational Bosnia." [7]
But others disagree.
For example, various writers published on Emperor's Clothes have argued that Izetbegovic was an Islamic fundamentalist whose goal was to create, by all available means, a totalitarian clerical state, modeled on Iran.
Emperor's Clothes and HIR have argued that the NATO and Western media blamed the fighting in Bosnia on its main victims, the Bosnian Serbs. Our research contradicts the official -- and mainstream media -- story, which has Serbs as opponents of all Muslims, as if the latter were monolithic. On the contrary, Fikret Abdic, arguably the most popular Muslim leader, was militarily allied with the Serbs. There is plenty of evidence that Alija Izetbegovic, who victimized the Serbs, was supported only by a minority in the Muslim population, and that his fanatical followers victimized thousands of moderate Muslims.[8]
So who is telling the truth? Newsweek, Knight-Ridder, Warren Zimmermann, the rest of the Western media, and a slew of academics, all of whom claim that Izetbegovic was a moderate democrat fighting for human rights and multicultural tolerance?
Or are Emperor's Clothes and HIR telling the truth when we argue that Izetbegovic was always an Islamic Fundamentalist, or Islamist?
Why is this an important question? There are three reasons why it matters whether or not Izetbegovic is a fundamentalist.
First, because NATO intervened politically and militarily for Izetbegovic. For example, former US Ambassador to Croatia, Peter Galbraith, admitted in congressional testimony that the U.S. gave Croatia the green light to violate international agreements by letting Iranian weapons reach Izetbegovic's army.[9]
The US also allied with Iran in order to import foreign mujahideen terrorists into Bosnia, and this was all coordinated directly by Pentagon intelligence.[10]
And NATO repeatedly and massively bombed the Bosnian Serbs, including with bombs encased in depleted uranium. The US and NATO backed Izetbegovic with destruction and death.[11]
Second, because if we are right to say that Izetbegovic was an Islamist fanatic, and that this was no secret in Yugoslavia, then the media lied systematically. It is difficult to explain such uniform media disinformation absent coordination by the covert services of Western powers. If we are right about Izetbegovic, then this constitutes evidence that the West has a controlled media.”
Barry Hussein Sotoero Barack Obama: "Gobble gobble!"
King Pervert Abdullah: "Hey let me fully unzip first!"
Yes, if only Barry Hussein Sotouero Barack Obama wasn't a dirty lying dhimmi, a crypto-Marxist Muslim and an embarrassingly brittle narcissistic and super incompetent coward.
Yep, Barry said in his uber-cognitive dissonant PC way that “...the United States “is not and will never be at war with Islam.” Barry bullshit. Gee, I'll let all those people that have been beheaded and blown up know immediately.
Gee, whose attacking us then? Oh, just some mistaken "people" that we all "misunderstand" that we can't even name or recognise. Amazingly, they're all consistently and fanatically propelled without let-up, by the SAME IDENTICAL er, "twisting" of lovely Islam. An incredible 1300 year old coincidence! Another fantastic coincidence is that they look, speak, think, plan, live and act the same, just like golly, Muslims! And this is just like Mohammad and as the Koran explicitly says to!
Amazing! But just a coincidence.
Sadly old boy, Islam declared war on everything and everyone not Muslim and Islamic over a thirteen hundred years ago, and in a billions of ways since, has continued their ETERNAL WAR against the non-Islamic world. Millions of Muslims commit to this relentless jihad twenty four hours a day, seven days a week and year after year at some stage or another, in most every country and state in the world.
Imagine it being 1944 and FDR saying “The United States is not and will never be at war war with Nazism, the code of Bushido, Emperor worship and Shintoism, fascism or Communism.”
And the MSM reporting straight faced that FDR was: “Calling for a greater partnership with the Axis world in an address to the Reichstag. FDR called Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and fascist Italy, important U.S. allies in many areas, including the fight against World War 11.
He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and fascism, portraying terrorist groups such as the Wehrmacht, the SS and Kamikaze pilots as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Axis forces.
“Let me say this as clearly as I can,” FDR said. “The United States is not and never will be at war with Nazism, fascism or Bushido, which is a religion of peace. In fact, our partnership with the Nazi world is critical...in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all totalitarian political projects reject.”
Colonel Neville: Hey, whatever big lie works for the current suicidal PC facade. Gee, how long will this fraud work? Well, Muslims have committed over 13,000 reported terrorist attacks since 9/11 and yet, the seemingly simple and direct statement of “kill the kaffir and infidel!” backed up by relentless MUSLIM ACTIONS, still doesn’t register with many. Go figure.
Here's more of B.O's crawling spineless lying dhimmi speech at this link, with lot's of drivel like we're all the same and "we pray to the same God", "I believe that Islam is a great religion that preaches peace", a "Muslim partnership" etc. All absolute moral equvalence bunk of course, so no. And as per usual, that the free West has caused Muslim resentment by Muslims murdering thousands of civilians and so on, in much the same way that armed bank robbers are often angry at bank staff.
Obama said and I kid you not: “There is an old Turkish proverb: ‘You cannot put out fire with flames." But Jihadist Muslims try, don't they?
Barry: "But force alone cannot solve our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism. The future must belong to those who create, not those who destroy. That is the future we must work for, and we must work for it together."
Yes, whenever you meet an violent extremist, reach out and talk to them and mot of all listen! To your own screaming as your head comes off. Yes, passive suicide and slaughter of the self is the best eh? Gee, didn't "those who create" build the World Trade Centre, Vienna and the giant Buddha?
And didn't golly, extremists either destroy or lay siege to them? And gee, isn't it clear from Obama's disgusting words and embarrassing cowardly behaviour, that "the future" belongs to the most violent Muslims? For Islam, violence and murder works EVERYTIME. Instant Western apology and concessions!
Yes, and what is it exactly, that the Muslim world last created beyond lies, oppression, dysfunction, irrationality, madness, violence, perversion and death? Zero, literally.
“Most terrorism experts agree: it is not "if" we are attacked again, but "when." Yet the assault has already happened. A silent battle is being waged on our nation everyday. Not with guns and bombs, but via covert sources: Islamic charities, the ACLU--even presidential candidates. They are all pawns in a stealth holy war.
Unwittingly advancing the jihadist agenda not by violence, but through endeavors designed to acclimate and subject us to Islamic law--just the way Osama bin Laden wants it. In Stealth Jihad, bestselling author Robert Spencer exposes how a silent but lethal movement is advancing on the U.S. and calls upon Americans to resist it--before it's too late.”
From the Inside Flap.
Does America face a jihadist threat that's even bigger than terrorism? While our homeland security efforts are focused on preventing terrorist attacks, another jihadist threat is growing right here in America--in plain sight.
In Stealth Jihad, Islam expert and New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer blows the whistle on a long-term plot by Islamic jihadists to undermine the United States. This effort aims not to bring America to its knees through attacks with guns or bombs, but to subvert the country from within--by gradually Islamizing America. The ultimate goal, the stealth jihadists themselves declare, is nothing less than the adoption of Islamic law in the United States.
Describing the disturbing ease with which stealth jihadists have already become ensconced in the American political and media landscapes, Spencer exposes the full modus operandi of the movement as revealed in a stunning document unveiled in a recent terrorism funding trial. In this unsettling book, he explains:
* Which Islamic fundamentalist organization is behind the stealth jihad.
* How stealth jihadists have reinvented themselves as mainstream civil rights activists--despite their many past declarations of Islamic supremacism.
* How stealth jihadists played a key role in formulating U.S. government guidelines for the War on Terror.
* How insistence on "accommodating" Islamic cultural and religious practices in America is part of a calculated strategy to achieve a dangerous larger agenda.
* The effort by stealth jihadists to whitewash the teaching of Islam in schools.
* What can be done to defeat the stealth jihad and preserve America's liberty America, Spencer demonstrates, is all but oblivious to a new kind of threat presented by a loosely organized movement whose activists are well funded, highly motivated, and relentless in pursuit of their agenda. This book is a wake-up call for a country so focused on foreign threats that it has left itself vulnerable to a growing danger much closer to home.”
Hotairs Ed Morrissey get’s it almost right on how George Bush spouted the same wilfully ignorant PC nonsense and blather, on how Islam is just dandy. The Ed spoils it all with a phony or is it stupid?, caveat of his own:
“And he’s right; the last thing we would want to do would be to declare war on a billion people just on the basis of their religion.
Colonel Neville: Hey, but it's OK if millions of Muslims worldwide have declared war on us, and most Muslim states either support it overtly or covertly in some way. Check. Nuance.
Ed: "The more we can keep the Muslims on the sidelines, the better off we are in fighting against the radicals.”
Colonel Neville: That entire sentence is an absurd fantasy entirely without merit or empirical evidence, cos there is none. But there's lotsa dark laughs!]
So balls and utter nonsense. WE ARE AT WAR, but unlike WWll, we are under attack globally and domestically with an overwhelming level of infiltration, self-delusion and out and out LIES that is beyond belief. And if we had the same kind of dominant super denial in WWll, without a doubt WE WOULD HAVE LOST.
Hotair: “Barack Obama, making his first visit to a Muslim nation as president, declared Monday the United States “is not and will never be at war with Islam.”
Calling for a greater partnership with the Islamic world in an address to the Turkish parliament, Obama called the country an important U.S. ally in many areas, including the fight against terrorism. He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and Muslims, portraying terrorist groups such as Al Qaida as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Muslims.
“Let me say this as clearly as I can,” Obama said. “The United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical...in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all faiths reject.” Here’s the objectionable part:
The U.S. president is trying to mend fences with a Muslim world that felt it had been blamed by America for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Yes, because George Bush spent the last seven years blaming the entire Muslim world for the 9/11 attacks, right? Right? Er, no, as this collection of Bush quotes regarding Islam makes excruciatingly clear. In fact, Bush emphasized friendship with Muslims from the very start of the war:
• “I’ve made it clear, Madam President, that the war against terrorism is not a war against Muslims, nor is it a war against Arabs. It’s a war against evil people who conduct crimes against innocent people.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush and President Megawati of Indonesia The Oval Office, Washington, D.C. September 19, 2001.
• “The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That’s not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don’t represent peace. They represent evil and war.” — Remarks by the President at Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. September 17, 2001.
• “All of us here today understand this: We do not fight Islam, we fight against evil.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush to the Warsaw Conference on Combating Terrorism November 6, 2001.
• “I have assured His Majesty that our war is against evil, not against Islam. There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion. The exact opposite of the teachings of the Al Qaeda organization, which is based upon evil and hate and destruction.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush and His Majesty King Abdullah of Jordan The Oval Office, Washington, D.C. September 28, 2001.
• “Islam is a vibrant faith. Millions of our fellow citizens are Muslim. We respect the faith. We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.” – Remarks by President George W. Bush on U.S. Humanitarian Aid to Afghanistan Presidential Hall, Dwight David Eisenhower Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. October 11, 2002.
And so on; there are plenty of examples to make the point. Obama spoke in the tradition established by Bush over the last seven-plus years of emphasizing that America did not declare war on Islam. That’s been obvious through our partnership with Islamic nations, such as Iraq, Turkey, Afghanistan, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, just to name a few. And he’s right; the last thing we would want to do would be to declare war on a billion people just on the basis of their religion. The more we can keep the Muslims on the sidelines, the better off we are in fighting against the radicals.
However, the AP wants to pretend that this is some new effort by the US to assure Muslims of our intentions. It decidedly is not, and perhaps a mention that Bush tried making these same assurances for almost his entire presidency would be in order here.” Ed Morrissey still not admitting the bleeding obvious.
Ralph White review of Stealth Jihad:
“Robert Spencer describes an America that welcomes its mortal enemies into its midst, gives them equal time with our founders' ideals, and defends their right to hate us. Spencer is a veteran of the struggle against jihad; his previously published titles include "The Truth About Muhammad," "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, and the Crusades," "Religion of Peace, Why Christianity is and Islam isn't," "The Myth of Islamic Tolerance," and "Islam Unveiled..."
Spencer adds his voice to Islam's courageous adversaries, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Brigitte Gabriel, Mark Steyn, Bruce Bawer, Carafano and Rosenweig, Benjamin and Simon, Efraim Karsh, Mary Habeck. Take the time to understand Spencer's and these other authors' warnings; distill their thoughts; and join the resistance to Islam's malevolent spread in America. France and Holland are already past the tipping point and will have some form of sharia law within 50 years. If you don't think it can happen here in America consider the Minnesota taxi incidents of 2006.
One taxi driver refused to pick up passengers carrying alcoholic beverages at the Minneapolis airport because to do so would "insult Islam." Soon other drivers joined the embargo against passengers with alcohol.
The city tried a system using different colored taxis to accommodate the drivers who were and weren't willing to transport alcohol, but the system broke down. Within three months 5,400 passengers were denied service. The drivers claimed that they were defending "freedom of religion." In fact, Spencer shows that no one was preventing the drivers from practicing Islam.
What the drivers were doing was "asserting sharia norms over non-Muslims." Had the precedent been allowed, what was to prevent drivers from refusing to carry passengers with pork products, or an unmarried couple?
Spencer shows that it is the Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al Banna, which is directing these and other incursions into the unalienable rights which Americans blithely take for granted. The Muslim American Society is the Brotherhood's front organization in America, and the Council of Islamic-American Relations is its political arm. These organizations reject peaceful coexistence, [promote] moral equivalence, and reject pluralistic governance. Resistance to jihad is not bigoted, racist, hate mongering, or Islamophobic; it is self defence against the war Muslims are obliged to wage against us. For them to live peacefully with us is to insult the prophet Muhammad.
You will not have to believe Spencer. His argument is most forcefully made by Islam's governance documents, the Qur'an and the Hadith (traditions of the prophet), and by Muslim writers and speakers themselves. Spencer quotes Islam's words verbatim and shows that there is no scope for compromise in the mandate to convert us, extract jizya (humiliating tax on non-Muslims), or kill us. These are their sole options and they mean business. America's very openness, its civil rights, its democratic ideals and institutions, and its tolerance create a vulnerability which Muslims use against us.”
