Obama's pre-emptive surrender so put on a happy face or two.

Machosauce presents Shoot again! Barry: "slow our development of future combat systems"

Comment: "This includes improved weapons, vehicles and body armor that increase the survivability of troops, as well as systems that permit us to use less manpower for the same task. Obama hates the bourgeoisie that serve in the military. If they don't vote leftist, he'd just as well have them get killed by not funding the projects what would have otherwise saved them.”

Comment: "If it wasnt for war, I wouldn't be here. My mother's family are survivors of the Holocaust. Most of my Mom's family were murdered. America/USSR's intervention in WWll, saved what's left of my family. My father's side is from Yemen, and if it were not for the Independence War of Israel, Yemen (and the whole Arab world) was on a killing spree of their Jews. The war and Israel's strong defense, was able to make a secret mission to save the Jews of Yemen. Thank G-d I am alive today."

Machosauce, we always could. Obama's Socialist left policy is much the same as a lotta Hitler's state control policy's. "More salad, Mein Fuhrer?" Hermann Goerring.

Mike Adams on the nature of Conservatism and the empirical difference with liberalism which is innately non-empirical. Hence the left liberal hysteria aimed at anyone who presents a single fact.

"This tragic view of human nature also explains why conservatives often speak of religion and family values. Given his selfish nature, man must internalize some reason to behave in pro-social ways. That fact that he falls short of these values does not mean he is a hypocrite. The one who does not even believe what he says is the hypocrite. The one who believes what he says and falls short is merely human."

Comment: "The entire article can be summed up as follows: The difference between conservatism is Conservatism works. Liberalism doesn't. It's really that simple."

Comment: "For me, the fundamental difference between liberals and conservatives is that conservatives, is that conservatives agree with the old adage that 'we are only 'little people'[=current PC term]standing on the shoulders of giants (e.g., Moses, Jesus, St.Paul, Plato, Aristotle, yes, Augustine, US Founders); whereas libs think 'we [e.g., Pelosi, Madonna, Dennis Rodman, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank etc.) are the giants, standing on the shoulders of 'little people."

Thomas Sowell author of The Housing Boom and Bust AKA The Wonderful World Of Bill Clinton, Obama and ACORN et al.

The fabulous iowahawk Don Rickles and Peter Cook's Obama, and other wilfully incompetent fascistic freaks. "You should have seen the other guy!"

And here. And again, The One is incapable of being hubris free.

Just so you all know where to find the great Steven Crowder, apart from all over hotair, pajamasmedia and YouTube.

Happiness is being old and Republican. McCain: one out of two.

Women just never notice how miserable they often make men's lives. Yep, women are more sensitive than men, but to only the things women care aout. No really. Go figure.

Celebrating traditional cultures.Papuan stone-agers eat woman. Please shoot on sight. This is how primitive men ruin women's lives. It's the lack of good straw housing.

“A woman was killed and parts of her body eaten by a Papua New Guinean cult, local media reports. Police in Kerema, Gulf Province on PNG's southwestern coast, arrested four people over the weekend believed to be part of a group who ate the dead woman."

Celebrating our multicultural diversity. Importing Tamil Tiger comedy improv and nihilist violence.

“There are conflicting reports about a brawl in western Sydney involving Tamil protesters, which has left one man in hospital. Police say two carloads of men assaulted another man who had taken a Tamil flag from them and snapped its pole in half on Railway Parade, Westmead, on Sunday afternoon." 'Conflicting', but there's a consensus on it's a total drag for us all.

Hey, Celebrating totalitarian fascist Islam Muslim jihad in New York. Via islaminaction.

Comment: “ANY MUSLIM THAT ADVOCATES THE IMPLIMENTATION OF SHARIA LAW AND A CALL FOR JIHAD TO IMPLEMENT SHARIA LAW IS ADVOCATING THE OVERTHROUGH OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND THE CONSTITUTION. IS THIS NOT TREASON?”

Colonel Neville: Exactly. Arrest, charge, try and execute him now or when millions of terrifying criminal freaks just like this get power? Tough call, eh?

Pajamasmedia meets the true face of pure evil in Iran's Ahmashithead. The disgusting Ahmadinejad murders thousand's of gay people, many of them minors, and he get's an audience of VIPS...Venal Irresponsible Pip Squeaks.

51% US citizens now pro life. 42% for murdering babies.

Earn over 600,000 pounds in your spare time! Become a government subsidised baby killer.

“In 2004, Adlakha was filmed by an undercover reporter from the Sunday Telegraph admitting that she had arranged for her daughter, Shilpa Abrol, to travel to Barcelona in order to have her healthy 31 1/2 week old unborn child killed. The legal gestational age limit for abortion in Spain remains 22 weeks.

The video showed her agreeing to help arrange a similar abortion for undercover reporters, by offering medical help and lying to a British hospital in order to obtain a scan for the Ginemedex abortion facility in Spain.

Also in 2004, the Daily Telegraph revealed that British abortion agencies, funded by the public health system, were routinely sending British women whose pregnancies had advanced past the 24-week legal limit abroad to the Ginemedex facility."

Spanish government upholds the proud EU tradition of not giving a damn what the majority of the people say. Ole!

Notre Dame’s President says murdering African babies is a beautiful thing and it’s for their own good but the Prez refuses to abort self.

Homeland Security’s super strawman fallacy. People who don’t want to murder babies are “right wing extremist’s” says Homeland Security.

We know just the men for the job says Scottish government agency. Please shoot on sight.

“EDINBURGH, Scotland, May 14, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A ringleader of a pedophile ring unveiled in Scotland was a top advisor to the Scottish Executive on homosexual issues regarding children, reports the Daily Mail.

LifeSiteNews.com reported Monday that James Rennie, the 38-year-old chief executive of LGBT Youth Scotland, was found guilty this month of molesting for four years an infant - beginning when the infant was 3-months-old - whom friends left with Rennie to babysit.

Rennie, who resigned from his position at LGBT Youth following his arrest late last year, lobbied for homosexual issues in the Scottish parliament, and has visited with the Prime Minister of England as "the Executive's most important and influential adviser on gay issues affecting children," according to the Daily Mail. Among other issues, the group lobbied for adoption to homosexual couples under Rennie's leadership.

Rennie and fellow homosexual activist Neil Strachan, who was found guilty of assaulting an 18-month-old boy he was babysitting on New Year's Eve 2005, are facing maximum sentences of life in prison as the ringleaders of an extensive network of pedophiles."


Despite the world not being entirely populated by only fifteen very stylish men, and the continuing popularity of bad taste, the American Psychology Association is damn puzzled why most people are naturally heterosexual.

"There is no consensus among scientists about the exact reasons that an individual develops a heterosexual, bisexual, gay or lesbian orientation. Although much research has examined the possible genetic, hormonal, developmental, social, and cultural influences on sexual orientation, no findings have emerged that permit scientists to conclude that sexual orientation is determined by any particular factor or factors. Many think that nature and nurture both play complex roles..."

Colonel Neville: Hey, go figure. But I know why most every organisation,[even scientific] now becomes by virtual default, a silly, bankrupt and activist joke clone. Now that's bad taste.

The Lefts Assault on Language Mirrors and Supports the Islamic Assault on Female Genitals.

Insane Saudi Sheik/Cleric/circus freak interviewed by Leftard hack Paul asshat Auster, rather ironically on the right. [See the second article by Caroline Glick titled the Lefts Assault On Language.]




Dig, I dedicate this post once again to the truly great women who run stophounourkillings, and to the women at the slightly peculiar rawa org, who nonetheless have a vast resource with serious insight into worthy essentials. You know the drill.


In the tedious MSM, Arab religioso head geeks and freaks, are laughably referred to as "top clerics" or "spiritual leaders" either of the Saudi or other wasteland stripe, and they are.

All one apparently needs to qualify for such a drooling moniker, is gross intellectual and emotional retardation, a mindset permanently attuned to the criminal as normal and thus possessing of the required and relentless psychopathology.

Basically, one must be stark raving mad, or you'll fail the interview.

Dig the teeth. He’s borrowing them from his camel. I have a whole hideous gallery of these mutilation pics and this, yes this vile crime and standard cultural practice is one of the least repulsive. Nope, I don’t mean the emotional and mental spastic on the left, who is a major advocate for the mutilation on the right.

Now it’s a well known fact that not a single lip licking advocate of depravity without limits via the genital mutilation of female children, has demanded that someone slice off their wanger with a blunt razor. Though I’d be willing to do a free consultation for any dirty Imam shit Sheik or other faux titled criminal butcher and Islamist psychopath.

"Show me just what Muhammad brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." Pope Benedict, 2006. Groovy link via moonbatcentral.


Why millions of Muslims are inbred, irrational and beyond reach dysfunctionals. Via Yahoo news.

Edited extract: “Saudi Arabia's most senior cleric was quoted on Wednesday as saying it is permissible for 10-year-old girls to marry and those who think they're too young are doing the girls an injustice.

Sheik Abdul-Aziz Al Sheikh, grand mufti, said during a lecture that those who say women should not marry before the age of 25 are following a "bad path," according to the pan-Arab Al-Hayat newspaper.

...about parents who force their underage daughters to marry, the mufti said: "We hear a lot about the marriage of underage girls in the media, and we should know that Islamic law has not brought injustice to women."

"For it to be said that it's not permitted to marry off girls who are 15 and younger is wrong," Al Sheikh was quoted as saying.

"A female who is 10 or 12 is marriageable and those who think she's too young are wrong and are being unfair to her." The mufti said a good upbringing will make a girl capable of carrying out her duties as a wife.

"Our mothers and before them our grandmothers married when they were barely 12," said Al Sheikh, according to Al-Hayat.

...it's also not clear whether these unions are on the rise or whether people are hearing about them more now because of the prevalence of media outlets and easy access to the Internet.

Activists say the girls are given away in return for hefty dowries or as a result of long-standing custom in which a father promises his infant daughters and sons to cousins out of a belief that marriage will protect them from illicit relationships”.


"The most fundamental fact about the ideas of the political Left, is that they do not work. Therefore we should not be surprised to find the Left concentrated in institution's where ideas do not have to work in order to survive". Thomas Sowell.

Colonel Neville: Think unversities, government, activist groups, unions, Hollywood, music and celebrity and so on.


Extract: "Our World: The Left's Assault on Language by Caroline Glick, THE JERUSALEM POST Nov. 3, 2008.

THE LEFT's co-optation of the language of law and democracy is not limited to geopolitics. It extends to issues of cultural politics as well. Take feminism for example. Education Minister Yuli Tamir fancies herself a great champion of women's rights. She has written about feminism and the need for women to have mandated equal representation in both public and private forums.

In all of her work on behalf of women's issues, Tamir has been clear that a society's refusal to mandate full equality for women goes hand in hand with militarism and other violent and anti-liberal tendencies. And yet, in 1996, while a visiting professor at Harvard, Tamir authored an article defending female genital mutilation in the Arab world.

In the Islamic world, girls are forced to undergo clitoridectomies to deprive them of sexual pleasure and so "preserve" their "modesty." Yet Tamir argued in her article, "Hands off Clitoridectomy," published in The Boston Review, it is wrong to oppose the practice because doing so requires a rejection of multiculturalism.

As she put it, opponents of the barbaric practice, "intentionally widen the gap between our culture and those in which clitoridectomy is practiced, thus presenting those other cultures as incommensurable with ours. The effect of this distancing is to disconnect criticism of their practices from criticism of our own, and turn reflection on other cultures into yet another occasion for celebrating our special virtues."

Celebrating Western virtues is a no-no for Tamir, because doing so makes us likely to defend those values at the expense of her leftist appeasement agenda. If the West judges Arab societies that mutilate women and girls objectionable, it is likely to judge appeasing them as objectionable and so reject the political message of Tamir and her comrades. And so, as she sees it, it behoves "feminists" like her to defend clitoridectomies, which she did in that article.

As far as Tamir is concerned, cutting out a girl's genitalia is no different from pulling her teeth. As she put it, "Removing a tooth is also a painful procedure, often imposed on children, and if performed in non-hygienic conditions, it can produce permanent damage." Tamir then went on to say that criticizing female genital mutilation is itself an act of misogyny because by expressing concern for the practice, critics objectify women. They reduce them to mere sexual objects.

So for Tamir the feminist, rejecting the superiority of Western culture - which allows her to freely express her views, vote, run for office, own property and control the fate of her genitals - over Islamic culture - which allows her to do none of these things - is more important than defending women. Indeed, she is willing to empty the rhetoric of women's rights of all intrinsic meaning to advance the interests of her radical leftist ideological platform against its rightist rivals who trenchantly criticize the mutilation of women and girls.

AND, OF course, Tamir is not alone.

In the US presidential race, American feminists have lost all credibility as champions of women's rights in their support for the often pornographic, openly misogynist and unabashedly chauvinist assaults against Governor Sarah Palin. Kim Gandy, the leader of the National Organization for Women, has argued that due to Palin's opposition to abortion, she is not a woman. [Dr Sanity on the how and why of the appalling criminal treatment of Sarah Palin. The groovy Deborah Gyapong picked it up too.]

Ignoring her record of service and achievement in Alaskan politics, leftist commentators and politicians have attacked her clothes, her shoes, her hair, her glasses, her children, her figure. They have insinuated perverted sexual proclivities and they accused her of everything from harlotry to illiteracy.

In an interview with Yediot Aharonot on Friday, the leftist American novelist Paul Auster, [GREAT link via rovianconspiracy on Auster the Leftard pervert and closet rapist] said of Palin, "There is something erotic about Palin that attracts people to her. Someone said that she reminds him of a strict schoolmarm, who wears a stripper's costume under her modest clothing.

I know this might sound funny, but I think that a lot of men are attracted to her and fantasize about being with her in bed. Particularly because she is conservative and far from all these erotic descriptions, the fantasy becomes even more powerful."

Auster then warned that if Palin is elected vice president, "a lot of good values will disappear from this country and we will become an evil, ugly country."

It apparently never occurred to him that his "funny" statements about Palin are the very epitome of ugliness and the absence of values like decency, tolerance and respect for women. And that's the thing of it.

THE ESSENCE of liberal democracy - the edifice on which liberalism and the democratic form of government were built - is reasoned discourse. Reasoned discourse can only take place when words like "values," "democracy," "law," "rights" and "equality" have intrinsic meanings that all members of society accept. When the Left empties these terms of their fundamental meaning and uses them only to enhance its political power at the expense of the Right, reasoned discourse is abandoned in favour of propaganda.

When equal rights are the exclusive privilege of leftist women rather than the natural right of all women, no woman can ever trust that her rights will be preserved. When the rhetoric of law is abused to advance the political power of the Left instead of defending the cause of blind justice, the rule of law is sacrificed in the name of leftist tyranny. When the cause of a nation is ignored in the interest of the fortunes of a faction, the fortunes of that faction will be advanced at the expense of the nation.

Auster told Yediot that the political discourse in the US has become so charged that dialogue is no longer possible between leftists and rightists. In his words, "We have reached a point where the two sides are no longer capable of speaking to one another, and I view this situation as a sort of civil war. There are no weapons or shooting. This is a civil war of ideas and separate ways of thinking, and often a war of ideas is the worst sort of war."

Auster's statement is true, and it applies to the entire Western world. But it is also true that one side bears the brunt of responsibility for the absence of discourse. The side that has destroyed the meaning of democracy, liberalism, feminism and racism to castigate and criminalize its political opponents is responsible for the absence of dialogue. And until the Left is compelled to acknowledge the intrinsic meaning of words rather than use vocabulary as a tool of political warfare, it is hard to see how this situation will improve.
caroline@carolineglick.com


The character Syme discussing Newspeak with Winston Smith, in the George Orwell book 1984 via Hotair.

"It’s a beautiful thing, the destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms.

After all, what justification is there for a word which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take “good”, for instance.

If you have a word like “good”, what need is there for a word like “bad”? “Ungood” will do just as well — better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of “good”, what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like “excellent” and “splendid” and all the rest of them?

“Plusgood” covers the meaning, or “ doubleplusgood” if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already. but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words—in reality, only one word.

...Newspeak is the only language in the world whose vocabulary gets smaller every year".