Kevin Rudds genuine emotional emotions and his phony economic hero.

This woman understands more about economics than John Maynard Keynes, PM Kevin Rudd, Greens uber-boob envirofreak Bobby Brown, President Barry Hussein Obama, Paul Krugman and hell, most of 'em.

Rather ironically, what Miss Feinstein does have in common with Keynes and Brown though, is that all three have fondled another persons balls and gripped a long hard wooden shaft in their hands. They may even share the same tastes in underwear, or is that only Krugman? Also, follow the dumb ideas of Keynes and Brown et al, and everyone and everything goes down and hard.






Now dig. I’m sure Kevin is sincere in how he feels about the people most directly effected by the hideous bush fires. No, really. Sadly that's the problem. A blubbing PM makes me feel uncomfortable and somewhat adrift. Did FDR cry after Pearl Harbour or Winston Churchill during the blitz? Curtin during the bombing of Darwin? Nope.

Yes, the terrible bushfires, curiously and apparently largely caused by Marxist Leftard Socialist Green policy, that has effected and killed mostly ordinary working-class people and more and their property. Big fucking surprise eh? Socialist Leftards destroying peoples lives via the state and its control freak interference and gross incompetence?

Gee, smells like...history. Here's eco-imperialism com for everything on just that kind of subject and how it effects people all over the world.

Here's Andew Bolt on the endless official fireload warnings ignored since er, 1939. And the freakishishly dull witted Bob Brown and other green boobs drivelling about it all being the fault of the big lie of global warming.

And one more for laughs, on how the local Nillumbik council are asshats whose idiot Green laws enforced with heavy fines, caused the deaths of many real people, the destruction of property and hey, the fire blasting of the land.

How pagan.

Hey credit where credit is due. The usually middle-class promoted Socialist and environmental Left with their ironic "don't burn off baby, don't burn off!", ends in a real "burn baby burn" a la 1960's actually burning down the homes of the mostly it appears, working and lower middle-class. And now Kevin promises to "re-build" not just entire townships, but the entire country with the er, Socialist state control. No, really. See Rudds essay.

Fantastic, in fact fantastical.

Sadly, Steele Rudd on Our Selection, appears entirely just as sincere, as far as one can tell with Kev the uber-position changeling, about his idiot faux economic influences, namely the crap ideas of one John Maynard Keynes. Here's KRudd and his incompetent dumb ass Socialist balls essay.

“I’m a Keynesian pure and simple”. P.M Kevin Rudd.

Well fluffy, then that would make you an incompetent shallow economic asshat Marxist Socialist then Kev old boy. And hey presto! He is. But no Socialism for you, eh?

“At twelve o'clock a meeting round the table
For a séance in the dark
With voices out of nowhere
Put on specially by the children for a lark.

Cry baby cry
Make your mother sigh
She's old enough to know better
So cry baby cry cry cry cry baby
Make your mother sigh.

Can you take me back where I came from?
Brother can you take me back?” The Beatles Cry Baby Cry.

That would be the Fabian Marxist radical elitist eugenicist Socialist Keynes, who knew zero about economics. He did prove though, that if one packages empirical nonsense and absurd bullshit well enough and then gets a critical mass of indoctrinated fellow travelers, any incompetent fraud and nihilistic soft totalitarian stupidity can be accepted as the normal and indeed, only way to go.

Hey, good old Keynes was a director on the British Eugenics Society until 1945! Ah, the control freak Left. Today their only alleged values can be stripped down to a bankrupt support for the controlling welfare state, abortion and identity politics. See [Left] Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg.]

Now Keynes ideas were and are unproven except as incoherent rubbish, and Keynes himself was a very hard working creep, especially the Hitlerian junk of eugenics as most of the Left were and still are. No, really.

Today it goes by the names of massive abortion and creeping euthanasia etc. Thus the Hitlerian Margaret Sanger of "exterminate the negro race" fame, founds Planned Parenthood. Since 1973 they have aborted over 14 million black babies.

And I can think of few things that more effectively remove people’s freedom than Socialist collectivism. No money, no property, no freedom of speech and no guns. Too much? Well, it is incremental. In Australia, freedom of speech HAS been removed by law and so have the guns. But we can keep our houses, so far. Fabbo then.

Eugenics are “the most important, significant and, I would add, most genuine branch of sociology which exists”. John Maynard ‘Crebbs’ Keynes.

Keynes used the device of making up terms as he went. He used the Fabian thang of “plausible deniability”, so that their own faux “reasonable” and “for the general good” position, at least as perceived, could constantly shift. If you say gee, you seem clearly an anti-capitalist pro-smiley faced condescending big government fascist geek. Nope, they can say oh no, I’m just “regulating” it so that it “works better” and so on. All academic balls of course.

“It’s over there! Oh no, I meant over there!” Their ideas are always a no-show in the present, ain't they just?

Just as the Left call the military killers and fascists, they then decry the “pointless deaths” of said killers whenever it’s useful for their phony ideology. Dig. Left Liberal hates troops, cos they “cause” war. Hates the war cos it kills troops! Hates the traditional family cos its “patriarchal”, but then support the er, family cos it’s now er, “diverse!”

But then a major feature of Keynes according to him and his stripe, was that only the highly educated could understand his economics medicine show. It’s easy to understand Keynes really. He was a Marxist academic and thus the kind of asshat the sane would not leave in charge of a corner store.

Perhaps Keynes, the rather highly strung and decadent homosexual could run a corner store fabulously, but we'll never know cos he never did any such thing. Keynes was all abstract fairy theory you see.

Why does the Marxist Left accumulate mostly in academia, government, celebrity and activism? Cos in these ivory places their abstract crap never has to be tested in any reality. And when it is, ya gets the Keynesian disaster that Rudd wants to bizarrely bring back from the tomb. And the taxpayer pays for it.

Gee, these must be the “fresh new ideas” Rudd spoke of BEFORE the election? What a twisted fucker.

Keynes proposed solutions to problems that didn’t exist except after one adopts Keynes dumb non-ideas. Freedom solves all problems that Keynes and his ilk babble on about. Thus capitalism was observed as a naturally occurring set of behaviors and practical systems where people lived unfettered in the massive freedom of American capitalist democracy.

Capitalism is an entirely natural human behaviour, based on private property rights, the free flow of ideas and capital, innovation, supply and demand etc. The Marxist Left gave the name "capitalism" to this entirely effective, fun and moral freedom in a spurious attempt to discredit the very wealth creation and choice that allows people to say fuck off to Marxism. And hey, to develop the advanced weaponry and guns with which to do so effectively.

Guns in the hands of free thinking human beings are for resisting and destroying collectivism.

By 1959, virtually every dimwit academic and government bureaucrat was a Keynes drone. Amazing really. Thus the same kinda boobs are all currently marching to the climate change $cam today.

The main things that make an economy work are lowering the costs of doing business and a real demand for goods, services, innovation and the freedom do so. Gee, like the old fundamental of golly, supply and demand.

So Keynes and Rudd discourage savings, encourage spending and lower interest rates. One out of three is bad. Keynes and Rudd style economic wank, can be summed up as there can never be enough government interference or artificial burden on the people and economy. But hey, thanks says Rudd for the millions of dollars he already has courtesy of an absurdly alleged “failed capitalism”.

Nope, there has only ever been failed socialist government interference in capitalism.

The only “flaw” in capitalism is that people won’t leave it alone. Capitalism always works, is fun because it creates freedom via wealth, goods, services and innovation and it’s moral, for entirely these reasons.

But then science surrounds itself with facts, while pseudo science surrounds itself with alleged experts. Pseudo science such as the unproven, beyond the disastrous, of the drivel of Keynes/Rudd/Obama/FDR/Al Gore drivel.

The Greens avoid reality by using computer modeling when models cannot show economic reality. Much of economics is psychological not add and subtract and predictive based on one’s ideological preferences. AH, Keynes means Greens. The Left and Socialist minded replace reality with abstraction and wishful thinking. Sadly their wishes are fucked up.

Capitalism and democracy give freedom. Thus the Left generally hate it. They prefer what they are against more than what they are for. We are for ideas not mobs. Invitation instead of intimidation. Learning instead of preaching.

The Greens ONLY preach. Henry Hazlitt wrote a book in 1959 that crushes Keynes and his fallacies utterly. It’s called Failure of the New Economics. Dig it.

Prodos: “...as I was studying Hazlitt's book, I was taken aback at how closely the con-artistry of Keynes resembles the con-artistry of the Climate Alarmists.

This has led me to the hypothesis that Keynesianism has provided a very "useful", well-tested, and highly "successful" trial balloon for the perpetration of - not just scams. And not just global scams. But global, pseudo-scientific, pseudo-intellectual scams. Scams which result in accepting - and/or feeling powerless to reject - deadly myths. Myths that kill.

Climate Alarmism and Keynesianism may seem like vastly different domains of suicidal insanity. But I'd like to discuss with you some of the uncanny similarities I see in the methodology of their con-artistry.

[According to Kevin Rudd:] The world has been reveling in an orgy of "neo-liberalism ... free-market fundamentalism, extreme capitalism .... excessive greed ... laissez-faire ... unfettered market forces ..." and in the economic philosophy of the theories of ...

... Hayek and von Mises, who believed that society should be characterized by the 'spontaneous order' which emerges when individuals pursue their own ends within a framework of law and tradition.

I hope you've been noticing all this, because I seemed to have missed it.

Come to think of it, no wonder it's been so difficult trying to promote laissez-faire capitalism these last 25 years. We've already had it for several decades now!

We already have minimal tax! We already have a deregulated labor market! Education, transport, hospitals, roads, utilities, are already privately owned and operated! The red tape required to start and run a new business is already so minimal it's hardly worth bothering about! Capital gains tax is already a relic of the past! Money is already based on an objective market standard! Governments and Central Banks stopped trying to manipulate currencies and credit back in some dark, distant bygone age!"


As Prodos said, the pseudo science of global warming uses the same kinds of trickery and con-artistry as Keynes and his pseudo economics. Marxism used the freakish nihilist idea of an alleged working class mob rule, whereas the Socialist "soft" Marxist Fabians like Keynes craved their own middle-class elitist mob rule! Keynes is like all of his type: cynical, arrogant, puffed with hubris and dangerously wrong about virtually everything economic and human.

Curiously Keynes like Bob Brown, was a homosexual who married a er, ballerina. [Only Keynes married a ballerina] No, really. Tu tu much?

Both were or/are often fatuous and not serious about any known economic reality I recognise. Bobby, the mediocre hare brained Greens leader, “feels” and emotes about the harsh world. He can’t seem to let go of his child-like views of nature, and how the human world should be beholden to it above all else. How ironically anal!

How anal Keynes was, I can’t say beyond he too, could never let go of a single one his stupid ideas. Keynes was a maths graduate and yet his maths were and are, entirely off. Thus proving that University and education does not remove stupidity but often reinforces it.

Ah, but Keynes was a successful investor. Keep your hands offa my stash, eh? So just like Rudd, capitalism for him, Socialism and its pathetic lousy results for you. Keynes father, John Neville Keynes, was an anti-capitalist. Big ‘effing surprise, eh?

Keynes was upset at the Treaty of Versailles, not so much cos it was bad per se, but because it hampered the rise of the Socialists in Germany. And that all worked out just great, eh?

Here’s a kicker. In 1926, Keynes wrote an essay called um, The End of Laissez Faire, meaning capitalism! I kid you not. Just like Rudd’s idiot cut and paste committee opus of blame shifting released via The Monthly! Who does Rudd blame? The capitalists, the international money men and gee, maybe by default the Joooos then? Rudd is priming people with this bullshit claim like a fucking get out free clause. "It wasn't me!"

At least those who are competent analysts [that word again] and who bother to read his cliché fest, will clearly see Rudds beyond belief economic and historical ignorance and incuriousness. Yep, nothing is his fault! What a perverse pin head and cunning ex-diplomat/technocrat he is.

Back to Keynes and his rubbish which is littered with straw men and the Kantian creepy notions that only the collective can know the truth. Keynes invariably sets up the “businessman” as the bad guy.

Keynes wishes to “promote semi-autonomous bodies within the state” for the “public good” and not the individual. For a crazy pansy he sure didn’t like the individual or them having freedom and autonomy. Keynes conflates size with control and conflates terminology.

Keynes shows, like Rudd and Obama, that you can put over an enormous amount of nonsense and people will accept it and even enjoy it.

Here is a great example of Keynes being sarcastic about the free market and in his witlessness he describes something that works entirely and then he somehow imagines it doesn't nor does it exist! Notice again Keynes contempt for the free individual and indeed freedom itself. Keynes equals fuckwit. Keynes needs an economic enema.

"Imagine if the free individual with enlightenment, pursuing his interests, benefitted the general?" Keynes.

Ho ho. Terribly witty. Oh, that's one of Keynes, ma'Lord. Well yes. I don't have to imagine it do I, you inverted bastard.

The “third way” of Blair, Rudd and Obama etc is a fraud and a Left tactic. It’s expanding state control and Socialism by stealth. The 3rd way ALWAYS increases state control and thus the road to totalitarianism and reduces the individual, as it has in Britain.

The Left always makes a false dichotomy of the group and the individual and extrapolates from there. Paul Krugman too, is a major economic creep of the Keynes school. Let’s see a nice quote from Paulus the wooden gnome chomsky, shall we?


Paul Krugman, Neo-Keynesian and Nobel Prize winner: “...the direct economic impact of the [9/11] attacks will probably not be that bad. Now, all of a sudden, we need some new office buildings.” New York Times, September 2001.

Hey, Krugman is just as warm, kind, nuanced and human as gee, Keynes! What a shame I can’t roll Krugman up in a carpet, take him out to the desert and say all of a sudden we don’t need another Keynesian creep. Nope, rolling people up into a carpet and destroying their economic autonomy and freedom is more for your Keynesians.



[Many thanks to Prodos and his Celebrating CapitalismTM lectures for real guidance and much of the insight for this post. Yep, not much in the way of footnotes and examples, but Jesus, that would cost me too much time I do not have. I’m tired of the faux thesis Olympics. So go borrow the Hazlitt book from the library or buy it, ya lousy cheapskate!]




More from the great, groovy and emprical Prodos: "For DISCOVER CAPITALISM™ we'll be studying Kevin Rudd's essay, "The Global Financial Crisis" just published in the most recent issue of The Monthly.

Mr Rudd writes ...

"From time to time in human history there occur events of truly seismic significance, events that mark a turning point between one epoch and the next, when one orthodoxy is overthrown and another takes its place.

The significance of these events is rarely apparent as they unfold: it becomes clear only in retrospect, when observed from the commanding heights of history".

[Colonel Neville: I seem to recall an essay on how to write well by George Orwell, in which he usues the cliche "commanding heights" as an example of bad writing. Anyone else know this one? So anyway, five stars to Kevin the Kliche King.]

Prodos: "Since the Financial Crisis is certainly not yet history, it is hard to see how there can be any "retrospecting" about it or any observing of its "significance" from any kind of "commanding height". No problem, because ...

There is a sense that we are now living through just such a time.

The world has been reveling in an orgy of "neo-liberalism ... free-market fundamentalism, extreme capitalism .... excessive greed ... laissez-faire ... unfettered market forces ..." and in the economic philosophy of the theories of ...

... Hayek and von Mises, who believed that society should be characterized by the 'spontaneous order' which emerges when individuals pursue their own ends within a framework of law and tradition.

I hope you've been noticing all this, because I seemed to have missed it.

Come to think of it, no wonder it's been so difficult trying to promote laissez-faire capitalism these last 25 years. We've already had it for several decades now!

We already have minimal tax! We already have a deregulated labor market! Education, transport, hospitals, roads, utilities, are already privately owned and operated! The red tape required to start and run a new business is already so minimal it's hardly worth bothering about! Capital gains tax is already a relic of the past! Money is already based on an objective market standard! Governments and Central Banks stopped trying to manipulate currencies and credit back in some dark, distant bygone age!

And it's all these sorts of unspeakable (if not invisible) chooks - which have been going on for so long - that have now come home to roost, thereby bringing us the current (with the worst still yet come) Global Financial Crisis.

Okay, now I get it.

But although I sneer at the absurdity of all this and much else which Kevin Rudd (and his associates) have written in this lengthy essay, such a reaction is not enough. It is merely my gut reaction. Mainly revulsion.

In fact this essay needs to be studied in depth. Both for what it says and for what it suggests. We should not ignore it, dismiss it or turn away in disgust from it. We should not minimize its signficance by saying "Aw he doesn't really mean that" ... or ... "He's just talking meaningless symbolism."

As we learned a few weeks ago when studying the Broken Windows Theory (i.e. allowing one window to remain broken will bring about a thousand broken windows) ideas and actions do not need to persuade in order to triumph. They don't even need to make sense. The best friends of evil are indifference, apathy, and inaction. Not to mention tolerance and friendliness.

Join me tonight as we embark on a deep study of Kevin Rudd's assault on liberty. Everything we learn, everything we clarify, every item of intellectual ammunition you acquire at this session, you'll be able to use elsewhere.

In the dismal years ahead you'll need all the ammo you can grab. Ammo is what this session will be all about. Intellectual Ammo "R" Us".

Cognitive Dissonance, Islam and zero fashion sense, combine to make NSW Greens MP John Kaye an academic failure and thus a Leftard success!

"Unattractive Middle-Aged Socialist Frumps For The Environment! [UMASFFTE] John Kaye models the latest cheap shirt from the Eternally Tenured Academic Range".




"Land for Islamic college obtained by deception, say Greens. December 12, 2008 The Australian.

“THE land on which an Islamic school is to be built in Sydney's southwest was obtained by deception, the NSW Greens claim. They are also demanding the state's education minister take back the land.

The Land and Environment Court gave conditional approval on Thursday for a 1200-student Islamic school to be built, despite the controversial plan having been rejected twice by Bankstown Council. NSW Greens MP John Kaye said the first problem was that the college would generate a lot of traffic and have a severe effect on residential streets.

"The second is the land was obtained by deception. The government was told it was going to be a residential development, Garden View Apartments was purchasing the property," Dr Kaye told the ABC.

"When they first signed the contract for sale, it was signed to a company called Garden View Apartments with the understanding that it would be developed as apartments, as the name would imply. Just before the contract was finalised, Garden View Apartments exercised their right to change the name of the purchaser and they changed it to al-Amanah College."

At that point the government made a massive mistake, Dr Kaye said…What we shouldn't do here is be distracted by the racist climate. We shouldn't be distracted from good policy by the idea there may be some people who oppose it because of the environment.” Continue reading.


Dear sports, I'm sure Greens MP John Kaye is a wonderful fellow and a million laughs. No, really. Sadly the Greens policy handbook is insanely radical Marxist shit, and no better than a smiley Left Liberal fascism sub-Mein Kampf. Or a kind of Communist Manifesto For Other People. You know, the one's that can't afford to live in the better quality areas, and thus avoid the bullshit and resulting Cosmic Debris entirely.




Colonel Neville: A mindset that can NEVER be satisfied, or proven to function in any known dimension. Relentlessly morally vain and conceited, it is always finding one more thing for the government to do, ruin or control.

So ipso facto, John Kaye being a Green makes him by default, just like Bobby Brown, an asshat. Bobby Brown appears to be a man who stretches his thin puckered mind to the limit, merely by remembering to breath. [Last link is Paul Dreissen's eco-imperialism com]

"Here comes Bobby Brown...Watch him now, he's going down". Bobby Brown. Frank Zappa.




Colonel Neville: Now one of the saddest things is to witness poorly groomed academics with their no one cares dress sense circa twenty years ago, sporting a dandruff flecked bad haircut and faux groover remnants and leather elbow patches, with optional surf board style or sensible shoes, with a marvellous range of cheap synthetics, twills and tweeds and all nicely round shouldered.

Yep, pathetic. And especially when said tragic is predictably spouting the entire sexless list of doctrinaire and tedious pet causes via PC left liberal hyperbole, and they then go and spoil it all by getting a new wardrobe.

And Doc Kaye managed by some wonderful miracle to do the right thing allegedly for the lesser reasons, while managing to appear as a wilfully deluded fool on the main point. The main point being that Islam sucks shit.

Plus the Doc naturally throws in a classic Straw Man diversion tactic of attacking unnamed "racists". As you do when you wish for others to take the blows you won't.

And everything was going so as per academic twerp well. Here's Dr Sanity on Strategies for Dealing with Denial.

Another thang is when a highly educated boob cannot tell the difference between two very different and distinct things. Like height and age, or shoe size and a stripe assed baboon waving a nine iron. So dig. Dr[!] John Kaye cannot t tell the difference between:

A. Religion, B. Race or C. Fellow Democratic citizens and D. Statistically millions of theocratic Muslims who want you dead.

The dippy Doc said the following on the recent passing of an apparently fraudulent application by an Islamic school that first posed as the builder of an apartment complex. A school which the Greens amazingly also now “oppose” per se:

"What we shouldn't do here is be distracted by the racist climate [!]. We shouldn't be distracted from good policy by the idea there may be some people who oppose it because of the environment”. The Doc drivels.

The Doc is clearly distracted by his own “racist” fantasy climate of PC confusion. “Racist climate?” Ah, that would be PC Left code speak for white people who voice their well grounded fears of something like gee, Islam. Dr John Kaye is unlikely to ever live next to or near the joys of Mohammad, the famous paedophile rapist and mass murdering Jew hating bandit. Is any of THAT a problem? I mean, even for er, “racists?”

There is not a more racist ideology than Islam.

And funny I thought. I have noticed the dearth of Islamic schools and Mosques in the well kept suburbs of the average Doctor and other professional classes. But I’m sure the Doc would jump at the chance to do so thus proving his non-racist credentials.

“I love the sound of the Mezzuhen in the morning”.

Here is a link to a exquisitely contorted example of the easily confused British dhimmi wimp trying to “accommodate” and be “tolerant” of the unaccommodating and utterly intolerant religion of peace or else. It’s a cultural suicide classic!

Mr Finkelstein says “I'm not calling for a retreat from the tolerance and mutual respect of this country. That's the last thing I want. I depend on it, don't I?” Well do ya punk? Indeed you do. It’s the basis of every sodden and collapsing PC Leftard fantasy. Just belieeeeeeeve! Cling onto, kid. It’s ALL ya got!

And here's thepeoplescube on a lapdog called media.

Now Doctor Do nothing spontaneous, himself admits to deception by gosh, Muslims. Gee, who could conceive of those in charge of an Islamic school project being deceptive, dishonest or using the Koranic art of deception known as Taquiyaa?!

I mean like, wow!

And yet anyone else who objects who is NOT as PC virtuous and pure as the DOC, is naturally a “racist!” Er, about which race again? Who cares! You don’t need a race! They’re just racists anyway!

The problem is that an Islamic school will teach er, Islam, which comes from the Krazy Koran via the which is more dangerously insane[?] Mohammad. Gee, finding a positive angle that derives from the Koran and Mohammad is like trying to put a cheery spin on the Manson Family’s day out at Cielo Drive.

And what a not so ironic coincidence that Charlie Manson was obsessed with radical and violent Utopian revolution that made no proven sense, as well as very fashionable Buddhism and a total misreading of pop culture via the Beatles. And Charles was a self-loathing white mental case who longed for a screwy race war to make things you know, "groovy". Go figure.

now dig that acoording to Doctor K, the first problem for Jihad By Stealth Polytechnic is er, traffic. Sure it is.

It’s not the traffic as much as the passenger’s, though no one likes an exploding range rover. Yes of course, traffic, deception, land and sewage. Yours or theirs? Just don’t mention the looming, ever growing and ever problematic presence of Islam. Better to lie about it and blame the victim Infidel’s while slipping further toward cultural and security suicide.

And where has allowing a good proportion of established Muslim immigrant areas to grow, been a real bonus and success story exactly? Europe? Britain? No, not for Muslims and Islamisation, but for us? Name one place that has a lot of Islam and Muslims that you and many other people would want to live there because hey, it’s a fun and happening Muslim area!

You know, cos of the great café’s, services, clubs and nightlife and the laugh a minute diverse community programs Islam is so well known for. That kind of thing and not all of them are fronts for Jihad! Er, no.

Here’s a surprise for a Left Green politician and academic. The Doc ticks every fashionable activist box! The Doc’s values can almost be narrowed down, ha ha, to more government and less of you and I. Thus nothing is exactly for sale and tested in the market place, but seemingly involves tax payers paying ever more tax for ever more non-ideas of the Left boob variety.

From the Doc’s fun site: “John has also worked as a volunteer, spokesperson, campaign coordinator, parliamentary policy adviser and candidate for The Greens, including:

Lead Senate Candidate, 2004 Federal Election. The Greens vote increased by a massive 30 per cent in a tightly contested election in which preference allocations by the ALP and the Democrats favoured right wing and religious extremists over The Greens. While he was not elected to the senate, the highly energetic campaign contributed to the development of The Greens as a major political force”.

“...the ALP and the Democrats favoured right wing and religious extremists...”

Colonel Neville: Riiight. So Nazi’s and Islamists then? Cos hey, there ain’t no-one else who fits that description. But no, while there are no Nazi’s, there’s plenty of Islam.

You and I know that “religious extremists” are default Left code for Christian and white. Dr Kaye, adding to the “racist climate”.

“A double serving of Cognitive Dissonance for table 8!”

"For the benefit of Doctor Kaye, there is always us to blame".

Consider that the Left’s fantasy of the “right wing” describes everything to do with the Lefts own relentless control freak impulses and goals of ever bigger government, nationalising industry, controlling capital, disarming the people and crushing free speech. So I would say that their absurd ideas of “right wing” have nothing to do with Conservatism at all, and everything to do with the empirical definition of the smiley faced totalitarianism of the Left Liberal.

And rather ironically, the core values of Conservatism of the individual, non-caveat free speech, the right to bear arms, property rights and the free flow of capital and innovation etc, are not common areas of thought and care for the Left. Neither is what actually makes Capitalist Democracy a success, the profound value and freedoms of the Western Canon, or the limits of the venality and fraud of Left ideology.

Ad the harsh reality of Islam to the long list of their Cognitive Dissonance and hey presto! But I digress.

Bernard Goldberg author of Bias: A CBS Insider On How The Media Distorts The News.

Hey Doc, give me the names of your alleged racist’s? Oh I get it. It’s entirely OK to randomly call great swathes of anonymous people racists because they naturally are uncomfortable with an ideology that wants to kill them and is attempting globally, just that. And even before it reaches 10% of the population, the empirical point of no return for the aggressed host culture and it’s radical Islamisation via Sharia Creep.

Every person living in the free Capitalist Democratic West has entirely legitimate reasons for fearing losing their own culture to multiculti atomisation and the opportunistic and long term goals of Islam and Muslims.

Apart from innate ignorance, stupidity and treason, there is only ONE authentic reason that the PC Left Liberal automatically denies the harsh facts of Islam and vilifies their fellow citizens en masse, like some retarded cliché scatter gun.

It’s because once one examines the fraud of multiculturalism, you have to examine everything else you believe in and maybe finally let it all go. It’s the boomer bullshit of the never ending PC Son of the Son of the1960’s and 70’s that defines their entire intellectual posturing. “I’m more correct than you and thus superior, and damn smug about it too”.

Any criticism of their sacred cow shit has NOTHING to do with whether you can provide a Himalaya of facts and reason that absolutely proves you are entirely dealing with the truth. It’s the mere fact that you dare to even question any of it at all, and not just totally accept the bunk we’ve all been fed at every level since we were kids.

Thus the nameless hordes of Australian’s are “racist!” And about a religion that is actually an entire multi-layered ideology with military, political, sexual, monetary, deception and infiltration, crime for Jihad, social, law and other wings, with an alleged religion as a mere beard. And now the cover of religion and political correctness protects Islam from ANY critique. Now any criticism of Islam is ALWAYS the wrong kind. Our right to free speech when mentioning the empirical facts of Islam is now a criminal offence. Even not saying the truth bout Islam can be an offence. No, really.

The default auto-hypocrisy of the Left Liberal MSM.

Under the existing “Religious and Racial Vilification Laws” that are in direct opposition to the UN Bill of Rights, the US constitution and our own laws and history, introduced by the now very comfortable Steve Bracks in 2001, all any Muslim needs to say is they are "offended".

The ONLY complaint taken to court so far is gee, by Muslims being offended by Christian Pastor Danny Nalliah quoting the Koran! I kid you not.

“It’s not the evidence that matters but the seriousness of the charges!” The Trial. Franz Kafka.

The exact opposite happens with Islam. The more atrocities committed by Muslims, the more the MSM and academia draws the opposite conclusions not based on any but their own stupid and doomed delusions. The facts of Mohammad, Islam and the Koran are easy to find, research and understand, both historically and as it is PRACTICED on the ground. Including in every Islamic state and by the many millions of Muslim immigrants to the West and elsewhere, RIGHT NOW.

Though not for those who expend their limited character avoiding learning and understanding a damn thing. THIS is Cognitive Dissonance: the PC Left Liberal’s greatest and most inexhaustible resource.

It sure ain’t harsh reality, research, analysis, individual backbone and courage.