Thursday, 4 December 2008

Frankly Marshalling Davis.

"Do you accept checks?" Frank Marshall Davis.

And now for something completely different, here's some more Obama virus pals via Family Security Matters.

“Khalid al-Mansour: the anti-Semite Black Nationalist racist who changed his name from Don Marshall and converted to Islam, was a patron of Obama’s and helped advance Obama’s candidacy to law school. He was instrumental in starting the violent Black Panthers group, became Kind Saud’s attorney and represents OPEC. No wonder Obama doesn't want to drill anywhere, although he changed that tune in last Tuesday's debate in an apparent attempt to drill for votes.

As an article in FrontPageMag com reported, “And why is it that black racists such as al-Mansour constitute a significant proportion of these hate mongers? In large part, it is because blacks have been specifically and aggressively targeted for recruitment by leaders of the worldwide jihad, just as they were targeted for recruitment by the Communist Party USA in the 1920s.

Black grievance, combined with the evangelism of the Nation of Islam over the last seventy years, has established an audience for the ideology of hate.

Penny Pritzker, heads Obama camp National Finance Committee was president of Superior Bank - massively failed and she literally bought her way out of jail paying $460 MILLION fine; was the very epicenter of subprime loan scandal” that would come to eat this nation’s financial system alive”.

Colonel Neville: Hey, as long as there's nothing suspicious going on, I'm hip.

Now here’s the thing. Frank Marshall Davis being merely a beatnik oddball weirdo and rebel is not a crime, unless he’s a criminal weirdo, dig? Life is complicated, people are complicated, everything is messy and we all have uneven and mostly unscripted and thus embarrassing lives if examined. And times change, though sometimes people don’t. But Davis appears to never have been just the local individual per se.

Davis was also one of only 26 male and female black students at Kansas U. He was a man who was naturally unable to tolerate the abysmal state of affairs for black people and acted accordingly and er, more so. And Frank could write poetic and vivid prose about what he experienced too. Perhaps more than a little like Steve Allen serenades Kerouac, Naked Lunch and The Howl etc. Hit that alto sax and bongos, man!

Being an alleged musician, actor and writer kind of inner-city anonymity myself, I don’t want to appear a hypocrite, cos’ I’ve been a classic bohemian oddball too, and spent way too many years hanging around fellow ne’er do well boobs. Ok, that was 2o very odd years ago, and I sure never hung out with the then unknown and now current President.

Ironically, I’ve never run for President myself either, as I’m sure being a Conservative, the MSM would bring up the fact that I’m merely a blogging errors of judgement prone hipster guitar player, and a sometime chef nobody, and thus not really suitable at all per se. Also they’d note that most everyone I used to know in my twenty’s were ignorant stoned fools, and couldn’t even organise lunch.

So I’m not so free of massive regrets or embarrassing and futile immature wastes of time myself. Dig, a lot of folks were once dysfunctional creeps and many an alternative rabble. I must admit I’ve had no paid up Marxist noodles as visitors or family friends lately. Nor do I know cruising sex novel writers, not that there’s anything wrong with that! So a classic young mans laughable and passionate life is pretty standard for many.

But what happens when you don’t regret or refute such goofball stuff, and maybe even praise such folks and maybe even believe in some of the central and absurd ideas, still?

And what does it mean when one hides, ignores, denies and excuses serious and consistent life long flaws in thinking, character and judgement? And this in people who are not just private and uninfluential citizens, but folks in positions of influence and power?

Well, the following is from Frank Marshall Davis’s son, Mark Davis! No really. He has a blog on Obama’s official site. A rather wacky scoop, eh? Where’s my briefcase of money? Now Mark is clearly a very distinguished and highly qualified professional man, who digs his own Dad as one usually does. Mark rather also groove’s to the Siren Song of Obama. So go figure what went wrong.

"Hey Joe baby, how come you never call anymore? What about my ode to the Glorious Red Army? That's gotta count for somethin', man!" Frank Marshall Davis.

Ah, but there’s the rub, the influence ones associates and peers can have, especially of blood... But that’s another story. Among other major achievements in an impressive career of service, Mark Davis has: “...received a Certificate of Appreciation signed by George Bush, Commander In Chief, upon my retirement”. That’s of the “BushHitler” Bush’s! Ironic, no? Oh, the humanity!

But listen up here. This is a post that could easily be a book, a dull book. But somebody would have to pay me to read everything Mark Davis. His writing is so far devoid of laughs. It ain’t easy going. It’d fit comfortably into any Left Liberal MSM, Huffington, NYT and Chomsky murkfest.

If I read much more, I would have started confessing to Jimmy Hoffa’s murder, which hey, I didn’t do, man! Or did I?

Mark posted several intriguing comments on a previous post and as I never delete anyone, well here they are. The other thang is, that like most Conservative and Libertarian chums, I’m honestly interested in the proven truth of things. No really.

I don’t need to exaggerate or lie a la the Daily Koskid. No really. I mean, why? The truth of Obama, the Left Liberal non-meritocracy and so on, is nothing I could ever invent. As Lonnie at YouTube's Conservative Voice says “You can’t make this stuff up, folks!”

Who ya kiddin’ with your Cosmic Debris? Worthy Conservative blogs and sites are the same as me. I don’t censor, delete or ignore. We believe in free speech and empirical rational facts and welcome correction, because correction of the fraud of passively received MSM bunk is our goal. This ain’t Mark’s naff and hyperbole prone opinion of “Evil Conservatives!”

A roomful of mirrors of the mind.

Within the limits of time, resources and my feeble abilities, I’ll jump kind of reluctantly into the peculiar Davis and Obama scene. Rather sadly, the wanting and disappointing tone of Frank Junior the blogger is a drag. You can read reams of it on his official Obama site blog, and then shoot yourself, folks.

And what is this thing called love? Jr raves on and on it appears, how basically all critics and all criticism of Pops and Obama are sooooo like, totally wrong! Like totally! But golly, Mark neglects to show exactly where they are wrong.

Dig. Jr arguments come over as bog standard if sophisticated Left Liberal guff. To discredit the message, Mark Davis describes a Conservative world of deliberate fraud and paranoid conspiracy that just simply doesn’t exist in my neck of the noodle or much anywhere. For Jr it’s all “right wing” and thus bogus.

In fact what Frankie describes is the natural state of the bankrupt and betrayed ideals of the Left Liberal, as empirically and thoroughly shown by such damn great proven and best selling talents and wits as P.J O’Rourke, Jonah Goldberg, Evan Sayet, Nick Cohen, David Horowitz, Mark Steyn, Robert Spencer, Michelle Malkin and Anne Coulter etc, etc, etc.

Here’s Marky Marx forensically futile blog:

Jr: “...they are trying to convince voters that he is unfit to be President by making false accusations regarding his character”.

Colonel Neville: He has character?! I’m afraid any serious research and analysis of BO past and present show’s Obama IS unfit to be President. 144 days sitting as a Junior Senator and a life of Left Marxist activism, and as a largely unproven lawyer, does not qualify anyone to even manage either a Hospital or a McDonalds. Er, asking question IS Democracy. Sure, it may not apply under the coming Obama Socialist Fun Park.

Perhaps if Obama could gee, provide from his own history and background, a SINGLE person, action or achievement of his own that shows how fit he is to be anything, and not just the President. Maybe if the MSM and BO’s emotive fans showed the slightest curiosity regards the associates and true nature in someone they profess to love, we could take Frankie Jr’s as per usual “don’t ask, don’t question” drivel.

It’s a curious fraud to make out that the mere act of asking about someone who wanted to be and now IS the President, is somehow verboten, “racist!” a conspiracy and lies. QUESTIONS are not lies. They demand answers. So far there are none but the obvious facts that Obama and most everyone he knew, was a misfit, an extreme radical and or a convicted and jailed criminal a la Rezko.

He is perhaps the first major politician and certainly the only President elect I can recall, that has never provided either his birth certificate, medical records or school records for public scrutiny. Why? Cos’ he looks little to nothing like his Father and more like a son of say, gee, I dunno, just for arguments sake, Frank Marshall? Hey, just askin’ man! Cool it!

Jr: “Spreading false information about your opponent is as old as politics itself”.

Colonel Neville: Which false information are we talking about? Jr doesn’t seem to say. Who is spreading it and why? Jr doesn’t seem to say. Oh, I know. The Vast Right Wing Conspiracy. Check.

Nope, changing the subject and attacking the messenger is even older. Virtually NOTHING negative has been shown to be false about Obama at all. From Wright, Farrakhan, Odinga, Bill Ayers, Annenberg, Woods, Grove Parc, Khalidi etc, etc, etc.

Why exactly did Obama attract and seek out so many such people?

Jr: “Unlike the swift boating of John Kerry in 2004, in which his heroism was questioned, current attacks against Obama take a more sinister tone”.

Colonel Neville: Kerry was and is apparently everything the Swift Boat Vets said he was. From the overstated vet, right up to the authentically treasonous and slanderous radical, of the Jane Fonda and John Kerry's Winter Soldiers, Slander The Troops Show.

Jr: “They are trying to convince voters that Obama is anti-American based on the radical behaviour of some of his friends many years ago”.

Colonel Neville: Balls. Frank again forgets to focus on a SINGLE point and where an actual person is wrong. Nevermind. "Of denial, of denial..." Hey, we all have it. These are not “friends from long ago” at all, but continuous and long-term pals of the kind that he has chosen over and over again.

“...based on the radical behaviour of some of his friends many years ago”. Now, just that sentence shows how unserious Jr is about ANY serious concern regards either his creepy Commie Pop or BO, who is apparently a “slandered” and simply misunderstood living Saint.

As far as I’ve seen, Jr dismisses virtually everything as some kind of invention by a malevolent force. Maybe KAOS or SCHMERSH? Sure it is. Highly worthy professionals are presenting harsh facts about the beyond belief façade of BO. Apparently spouting empty slogans and Marxist junk is mighty impressive to many. Why are these things beyond questioning? It’s normal and entirely correct to do so.

Here’s MY POINT. Say every freakish thing about Obama and Davis is untrue. “...every freakish thing about Obama and Davis is untrue”. Thank you. Then what is the alternative history and where the Hell IS IT? Bit of a vacuum there, eh?

Jr: “Jumping to conclusions seems to be quite common in the fantasyland of the right-wing blogosphere. When asked to substantiate their conclusions, we may encounter bluster, red herrings, and ad hominem attacks more often than rational, focused answers. Military Intelligence students are quickly disabused of such behaviour, and learn the value of supporting every conclusion they proffer. Researchers at the Rand Corporation and other highly-regarded research institutions often come from such rigorous backgrounds, where conclusions are based on empirical evidence, rather than wishful thinking”.

Colonel Neville: Replace “right” with “Left” and this is an amazingly accurate statement. Yeah, Daily Kos, Huffington Post and the New York Times etc, are high level empirical sites...Er, no. Where are these great Left wing sites exactly? And where are these well known Conservative sites that are bunkum? Ah, The Rand Corporation. Now there’s a funny thing.

Jr: “It's a pity that blogosphere researchers and commentators are not held to similar high standards of accuracy. It's a pity that their fans consider clearly documented misrepresentation to be insignificant as long as it confirms their biases. It's a pity that such predisposition to believing disinformation can be exploited just as easily by Accuracy In Media (AIM) editor Cliff Kincaid as it was by the Bush administration in selling the Iraqi threat. Even today, when all of the false evidence supporting Iraqi WMD stockpiles has been clearly debunked, Bush loyalists may insist their conclusions were true despite the lack of evidence”.

Colonel Neville: Balls. No “debunking” and no “lies”. The intelligence was the imperfect art that most everyone agreed on, including the Democrats.

Warning Saddam with 17 UN Resolutions over several years of an attack is er, a great head start to Syria. Saddam was only retrained by his reach, not his will which was always over the brink. A man who can murder hundred’s of thousands of people, including whole villages, towns and even cities and a large percentage of actual states and had had grand plans for much more is by definition, a weapon of mass destruction.

“Of course I’ve always supported keeping every totalitarian mass murdering fascist dictator in power indefinitely. These are my moral inversions and I stand by them. Unless of course it’s the democratically elected civil servants George Bush, Tony Blair and John Howard, then I want them out immediately!” Anne Idiot.

Colonel Neville: l'm happy to kill as many totalitarian dictators as possible. Kill them all ASAP. The alernative is?

Saddam as a massive oil funded Stalinist dictator at the crossroads of the Middle East was empirically a long term and serious threat at every level to the West. President Hussein was a massive supporter of homicide/suicide bombers and a classic not so strange bedfellow of Islamic terrorists everywhere. Thus many a top terrorist made a welcome home there.

Now do tell me, Jnr, what exactly was Bush gaining from attacking Iraq again? Apart from being hated by the Left etc, and losing the election? Was that his plan? There is no such thing as a modern war for oil. Oil is a commodity like sugar or coal. You simply buy it. And Saddam was willing to give it away at rock bottom prices or for free, or for trade is obsolete military gear to stay in power. A war for oil as in WWll, would involve a race to the Basra fields only, ignore the cities and set up a blockade to the coast and in the sea straight. So no.

Now, here’s a telling fact. Like me, few Conservative and Libertarian sites censor comments. Censoring on a massive scale is par for the course with left Liberal and radical sites. I AM the Conservative that you talk of and like me, all the other Conservatives of the Net care entirely about free speech and the empirical truth of things. If you can supply the name of any Conservatives that are taken seriously by other Conservatives, that are serial liars and phonys, let me know.

Jr: “A huge proportion of African-American poets (and writers and intellectuals generally) remained engaged with the Communist Left and cultural institutions from at least the early 1930's until at least the early 1950's. With the partial exception of the period from the German invasion of the Soviet Union to the end of the Second World War, the CPUSA placed the issue of race and the fight against Jim Crow near the centre of all its work.

The bottom line is that communist ties were the NORM for African American poets and civil right activists during that period. Such ties did not mean that they internalized Marxist values, much less Stalinist values, even if they were aware of the distinction”.

Colonel Neville: Hey, Mark Davis obviously sees some er, "distinction" between a Communist and a Marxist that is invisible to the sane. Pray tell, what is it?

Well, being a Commie wanker as a NORM, shows what useless, though sometimes amusing fools many an alleged “artiste” is. They almost to a boob, believe that their superior emotions are reality.

Frankie Jr loves Logical Fallacy. That something is the er, “NORM”, does not validate or justify it, or mean one should accept it. Especially being an immature incompetent who “lives in a fantasy life completely supported by the system they despise”. Fill me in. How is supporting the totalitarian ideology of Communism based entirely on murder, conformity, lies, spite, envy and madness, a good thing? I’d love to know.

Jr: “The continuing reluctance of otherwise intelligent people to critically evaluate their leader's "evidence" suggests a "Good German Syndrome." Such blind faith is critical to the success of dictators of all stripes”.

Colonel Neville: Exactly Jr. Barack Obama is YOUR leader, and why can’t you “critically evaluate” your leader’s “evidence?” And Hell, NO ONE has ever had such global appeal as Obamambalam. It’s freaky.

From Left Liberal guilt trippers and Marxist killers, 94 to 100% of black voters to HAMAS and on to traditional, venal European Socialist America haters and beyond, they all just lurv the O. Not JFK, Hitler, Mao, Jesus Christ , the Dalai Lama or the Beatles have ever had such a bizarre and contradictory massive audience in thrall. What the Hell is this? A Junior Senator with zero demonstrated achievements, and an unknown to most history! Just as Jr and his ilk want it to be, eh?

Jr: “It promoted acceptance of the fraudulent "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" in the early 1900's, acceptance of the fraudulent Iraqi threat disinformation campaign a few years ago, and acceptance of the fraudulent AIM disinformation campaign today”.

Colonel Neville: Riiight. Anyone who asks questions of Obama is somehow an anti-Semite KGB agent? Check and nuance. Is Jr ever uncomfortable with his Himalaya of Logical Fallacy, Cognitive Dissonance and plain old Left bullshit tactics of obsfucation? Guess not.

Jr: “It is especially ironic that those whose ostensible priorities are accuracy and freedom are so willing to suspend their critical thinking, and call for the banishment of naysayers. Some of them have their minds made up and don't want to be bothered with "evidence schmevidence."

Colonel Neville: Again, Miniature Frank Juniour everything about himself by merely changing the names of the usual suspects. Frank Davis WAS a friend of that avowed Stalinist and deluded boob with a great voice, Paul Robeson. Another Commie and useful idiot. Robeson DID advise Davis to go to Hawaii, where Davis DID work for a black Communist paper as a leading light.

For Mark Davis, the Communist Party of America apparently contains little to no Communists! Nobody is a Pinko in the premier Glee Club for Pinko's. Sure, they’re all over at the Delaware Knitting Circle. The place is crawling with ‘em.

Jr: “Wake up, ladies and gentlemen! Is your name "Nifong"? Smell the coffee! Examine the evidence! Stop being led like lemmings over the Cliff of Deception. The Emperor's New Clothes, the layers of false evidence that Davis corrupted Obama, are nothing but deceptive illusion. Victims of deception go to great lengths to avoid admitting their gullibility, which is one reason that catching scam artists is so difficult”.

Colonel Neville: Smell that Soviet Erzats Peoples Coffee? The one with real wood shavings! Yes, “Nifong”. Amusing. Thus nothing negative about Davis and Obama can be true. Check. Again, ya talking about Obama, dear old Dad or you?

Dear reader, you may wait quite a while for Mark to focus on a SINGLE point and counter with actual evidence. Don’t hold ya breath toom long. THE point is that Obama’s entire life is a pattern. And gee, Davis too aparently. A plaid and checked pattern!

From BO’s rabid atheist Marxist in-Laws and their freak daughter who became BO’s Mother, to BO’s Muslim bum Poppa, to his stoner activist Soviet Thesis Uni days, to 20 years at the Marxist Black Liberation “Church” of the disgusting parody racist and bigot, fraud and mediocrity of Rev Wright, to forever juvenile Marxist and co-conspirator to murder Bill Ayers, to getting millions of taxpayer dollars for Marxist indoctrination and kick backs for fake and failed “housing”, to throwing farewell dinners for PLO pressman killers like Khalidi, and on and bloody on. Like this bloody post.

It's a classic of the diversionary fake to natter on about the non-facts of a subject as if it’s in utter isolation to anything else. Obama is if anything, consistently rotten as is his wife and mostevery close associate he has ever had.

But Lord, Junior’s blog is like Kos and Huff without the swearing and a higher standard of hyperbole.

I’m sorry that some folks can't face the fact that Frank was a classic bohemian wacko, and a rebel tainted with prurience. And apparently Obama is just superb! Laughable really.

Maybe to the deluded, the grievance sodden fantasist and the treasonous geek. And man, don't tell me they won't all turn on Obama soon enough, and as suddenly and superficially as they picked him up a mere three years ago. The modus operandi of the Leftard Liberal. They do love their fashionable morally vain causes, victim pets and phony Saints.

'Kaleokualoha has left a new comment on your post "Papa was a Muslim bum and Momma was a Marxist geek".

Jr: "Recycle absurd lies" applies to the posted information regarding Frank Marshall Davis. Davis is not a figment of the imagination, but the allegations certainly are. I shall address the falsehoods separately.

Falsehood #1: Obama wasn’t mentored by Frank Marshall Davis. This is disinformation, which ignores the fact that as an older teen, Obama didn't even visit Davis for three years.

Colonel Neville: Obama mentioned Davis in his book as a major influence. Is it true that Barry would have known of Davis for at least 9 years?

Jr: “Obama's book indicates he was family friend whom he only visited occasionally”.

Colonel Neville: And I’ll say it again. Obama speaks of “Frank” in his book as having been a great influence. Why would he say that? The fact is, every substantial associate and influence of BO’s has been a rather natural progression from Davis. They’re a parade of Left Liberal activists, radical Left Marxist freaks, Black and militant misfits, Muslim weirdos and bums and combination’s there of.

Jr: “A disinformation campaign, spearheaded by Cliff Kincaid's "Accuracy In Media" (AIM), exaggerates Davis's radical influence on teenage Obama. The Obama campaign specifically refuted this fraudulent meme, which deliberately misrepresents the relationship as "almost like a son." A painstakenly documented analysis of this disinformation campaign is posted as "specific misrepresentation" at.. [here].

Colonel Neville: Now dig. Junior’s complaint apparently centres on Cliff Kincaid writing about Frank Marshall Davis at AIM, Accuracy In Media. Now go read it and you tell me where any of it is anything but clean and scholarly. WTF is Mark babbling about? Hence the endless noodling about conspiracy and right wing bastards, like er, me!

Is just AIM alone important in the end? BO and his pals ARE empirically radicals! Obama admitted in 2007 that he kept regular phone and email contact with Bill Ayers, and Obama astoundingly wrote a blurb for the inside jacket of Ayers book!


There are multiple worthy sources for the damnation of Barack Obama, and most of those come from Obama himself. Thus his eerily paranoid and spoiled grievance opus Dreams From My Father. So David Freddoso’s book The Case Against Barack Obama is totally wrong? Where and bloody how?

Isn’t it true that Obama’s own website put up a fake document as proof of birth that was soon removed? The only influence Davis could have on a young teenager, which has not been rfuted by any alternative resume by anyone, is a radical influence. Ad that Obama’s Mother was a Marxist radical, that Obama has associated with an unusually long list of radicals, extremists and criminals and that Obama himself is a radical, THE most radical President elect in US history, and how much of a radical influence Frank had is rather moot point. Again, Obama himself admits to Frank being an influence of some er, gravitas.

For some crazy Leftard gravitas dig this excerpt from a Leftard comment at AIM. It’s a classic.

Segatious: “Who really cares if Barack Obama is a communist or socialist? Compared to the last 7 long years of having this idiotic moronic bloodthirsty murderous corrupt pathologically-lying sociopathic demonic fascist slimeball known as Dumbya in the White House, America would be well served to have a large amount of corrective action put in place by a communist or socialist.

The simple fact is that President Cheney and his little dummy have easily been the worst leaders this country has ever had, and certainly ever will (arguable the worst in world history). I mean they even make Adolph Hitler look like a great guy. At least Hitler took care of his own people.

You can’t even say that about Dictator Bush. I doubt you’ll ever find anyone more universally despised across the universe than George W. Bush. He has become so mentally deranged that today he even said we’re not in a recession...all the coverups surrounding 9-11...I guess that’s what you Rethugnican fascists want...”

Colonel Neville: “Rethugnian” [!] Christ!]

Segacious: “So, I’m all for Barack and think flushing George Bush-style capitalism down the toilet into the cesspit of history is a fantastic idea. After reading this article, I’d be even MORE inclined to vote for Obama now”.

Colonel Neville: Textbook moonbat, eh?

Jr: Falsehood #2: Davis did not tutor Obama in Marxist techniques.

Colonel Neville: Hey, he bloody well learnt them anyway, didn’t he? The question is, what other views and attitudes NOT of a radical nature did Davis have to offer? I can post them if you know of any...No dice? Nevermind.

Jr: “It is unfortunate that so many people believe falsehoods spread by "Accuracy In Media" (AIM) against my father, Frank Marshall Davis. AIM has been conducting a disinformation campaign against the Obama-Davis relationship. The campaign consists of a series of small lies fabricated to support the big lie that "His values, passed on to Obama, were those of a communist agent who pledged allegiance to Stalin. [See]"

Colonel Neville: You admit that Davis did indeed join the Communist Laughter Club of Dogpatch sometime during WW11, and golly, that was part and parcel of the membershit thang, yo all. What other kind of Soviet Commo profile was available to Frank? I’d love to know. Quaker Commo? Anti-Communist Commo? Free market Commo? Commo comedian?

The most serious “disinformation campaign” is the refusal of the MSM to seriously investigate virtually ANYTHING about Obama.

That would include the not complete list of Obama/StanleyDunham/Birth certificate and school records/what Obama says in his books/ what he truly believes/voting record/drug use/Indonesian Islamic school/Kenya family background/Rev Wright/Farrakhan/Rashid Khalidi/Tony Rezko/Bill Ayers/ACORN/Annenberg Project/Grove Parc/Mercer Island/Cousin Odinga/The Woods Foundation/Michelle and the Chicago Hospitals and Treehouse etc/Black Panther intimidation and so on ad nauseum

Jr: “Edgar Tidwell, whom AIM's Cliff Kincaid cites as "an expert on the life and writings of Davis," demolishes right-wing misrepresentation of Davis's radical influence in one simple paragraph".

Colonel Neville: Really? We’re Conservatives. Full stop. The stripped down version of our beliefs are individual freedom trumps the group. Absolute free speech. Property rights and the rule of law. The proven over the Utopian and fantastical. The right to bear arms. Capitalism, Democracy and the free flow of ideas, capital and innovation in a free market and so on. So no "demolishing"

I'm not interested in the pointless behaviour of “misrepresentation”. Thus I often hear of “right wing”, [meaning not Left groupthink] being er, “demolished” in argument, though I have seldom witnessed it. Again, if Frank Davis was not a radical, where is the evidence of his alternate regular guy curriculum vitae?

When the Left deny the crimes of Che the child killer and Fidel’s Cuba they can amazingly negate and dismiss fifty years of evil. But they cannot create the presence of fifty years of Cuban artistic, musical, commercial, scientific and human freedoms etc, because there is virtually none under Fidel, and certainly little worthy that does not go unpunished .

So where is this other Frank? The good one that influence Barry so? At best, isn’t this just another of the many pieces that show a continued and startling behaviour style and choice of friends in BO? Hmmmm?

Jr: "Although my research indicates that Davis joined the CPUSA as a "closet member" during World War II, there is no evidence that he was a Stalinist, or even a Party member before WWII.

Colonel Neville: Ok. So we agree Pops was a paid up Pinko. But now it's unimportant or OK, or he was not serious anyway? Check. Gotcha.

“Ve all had to join zer Nazi Party! I never vanted to! I only vent for zer free schtrudel!” Wolfgang Schplotzmier.

Jr: “Further, to those attempting to make the specious stand for the concrete, there is no evidence that he instructed Barack Obama in communist ideology”.

Colonel Neville: Er, what does someone like Frank talk about with a young man exactly? I’m open to topics of conversation.

“How about those Redsox?”

“Hey, great wallpaper!”

“You know, I think I may join the Rotarians”

“Let’s go to the hop oh baby, let’s go to the hop!”

“Ironically, ever since I joined the CPUSA, I’ve been strictly against spreading the influence of Marxist and Socialist ideology, especially among the young. Go figure!”

Jr: “Frank Marshall Davis did NOT believe in overthrowing the USA”.

Colonel Neville: Bummer, cos Communist Party's like the CPUSA usually do. Hey, did Frank let them know he was shocked, “shocked!”, at some of the views of the CPUSA? Cos you know, he didn’t hold them apparently...

"If I knew the Communist party was filled with Marxist's, I never woulda joined! I want my money back!" Hymie Scrotumpkie.

Jr: “He was committed to what the nation professed to be. For him, communism was primarily an intellectual vehicle to achieve a political end-a possible tool for gaining the constitutional freedoms of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness for ALL Americans..."

Colonel Neville: Yes, Americans would be MUCH happier under Communist totalitarianism...Clear as day! Er, no. Idiot.

This is the best part and just like Islamists spout too. Sure, we don’t really want an Islamic state, but if it happens due to our wholly er, peaceful means, what can ya do? It happens.

“Nation as it professed to be”, is a Marxist diversionary tactic to pretend to value the Constitution and the real America of freedom and prosperity, which is never good enough for a Marxist totalitarian, while simultaneously working to destroy ALL America has been, is no and will ever be. Apparetly freedom for all means putting in place Communist ideology based entirely on mass murder, lies, conformity, spite, envy and madness.

Jr: “If AIM had actual proof of my father's radical influence, there would be no reason to fabricate evidence. Frank Marshall Davis was almost lynched as a young boy. I cannot allow Cliff Kincaid to repeat history”.

Colonel Neville: How much do you need as you've dismissed everything so far as a plot? Now this is the crux of Juniour’s seeking the truth posturing. Anyone who asks a question is a bad person by default and a conspiracist etc. And gee, no evidence is ever good enough for Junior. Circular denial, that’s the Junior way.

It's some catch that Catch22.

As I said, so far I’ve been unable to find a focused refutation on a single point. Ad hominem and the old ulterior motive as yet unproven or unstated, and the old "right-wing disinformation" cards neither cut it, nor gives me confidence in the er, dealer, being the seeming prodigious Son. Has Junior ever had ANY uneasiness and doubt about Pater?

Jr: “Fortunately, Uncle Sam trained me to recognize and refute such lies. I am a retired Air Force Intelligence Officer, with specific CIA training in Deception Analysis at "The Farm" in 1989. Their "specific misrepresentation" is documented at [my blog] and I invite your readers of integrity to review my proof of AIM's deliberate misrepresentation. Please refute my analysis, if possible. I believe you will find that the case for AIM disinformation is ironclad”.

Colonel Neville: Like real iron? I'm clad all over! I’d ask for my money back, kid. Well, that’s Jim Dandy, but the burden of proof is on you, innit? So far, a rather light load of the empirical and supportive. In the Air Force, eh? Well, my hat goes off to you, but sadly, a lot of cluelessness, naivety, incompetence and a lack of focus has been seemingly par for the course in much of the old intelligence community and for many decades. On your watch too?

Jr: Falsehood #3: Frank Marshall Davis was not a "paedophile pervert. He wrote a pornographic novel under the pseudonym Bob Greene, one chapter of which is devoted to the protagonist and his wife having sex with a thirteen year old girl, according to a British website on 24 August. According to the British website, "Mr Davis, [writing as Greene] explains that although he has “changed names and identities...all incidents I have described have been taken from actual experiences."

Colonel Neville: Hmmm. Hey, sure, so maybe not then. So maybe Frank wass more of your classic bohemian and simple perve Marxist celebrity style phony and hypocrite, which is not illegal and can help any Hollywood career. Sure is a curiously coincidental and creepy thing to write under the er, circumstances though. It is just a book eh, literary licence an' all...

Ok, I once wrote a story of how I eloped with a stripe assed baboon, but that was not autobiographical, semi or otherwise. A man can dream though.

Jr: “In a same day report citing the British website, "Accuracy In Media" (AIM) reported that Edgar Tidwell, an "expert in the life and writing of Davis" confirms that Frank Marshall Davis wrote "Sex Rebel: Black" as a semi-autobiographical novel. Despite Tidwell's expert opinion that the novel was SEMI-autobiographical, AIM's Cliff Kincaid escalated accusations against Davis by first claiming he was a sex pervert in their 24 August report. [Kincaid falsely attributed the "pervert" claim to the British website.] On 14 October, AIM again escalated the charges by claiming Davis was an "admitted child molester"

Colonel Neville: Look, I’m getting confused here. Is Mark saying it’s not true, all true or half-true? Give me a hint.

Jr: “There are at least four distinct disclaimers that indemnify Frank Marshall Davis from literal attribution of this novel:

a. According to, "identity" means "condition or character as to who a person or what a thing is: a case of mistaken identity." Changing name AND identities means changing names AND other "condition or character as to who a person or what a thing is," which may include biographical data such as age.

b. "Taken from actual experiences" does not mean they are accurate representations of actual experiences. It only means they are based on actual experiences.

c. Edgar Tidwell, the expert on the life and writing of Frank Marshall Davis, says the book is "semiautobiographical," which (according to means "1. pertaining to or being a fictionalized account of an author's own life. 2. pertaining to or being a work of fiction strongly influenced by events in an author's life."

d. Further, scandalous memoirs such as "Sex Rebel: Black (Memoirs of a Gash Gourmet)" have been a literary genre for centuries. According to Wikipedia, such fictional novels are allegedly factual, but are largely invented. The title, alone, qualifies it as a "scandalous memoir."

Colonel Neville: Er, weren't these are all designed for the legitimate writings of the worthile and innocent? Does Memoirs of a Gourmet Gash[!] qualify? I’m not a big one for strict high and low art paradigm unless of course, when there is one. Yes, a “literary genre for centuries”, and always rightly considered as a genre of utter puerile rubbish. And because it's er, legitimate, where is a single copy?

Bill Oddie: "You’re a loony!"

Graeme Garden: "They said that of many a great genius..."

Bill Oddie: "They said it of a lot of loony’s too!"

Jr: “In an honest evaluation, any of these disclaimers should protect the author from literal interpretation. The combination of all four should provide absolute protection from any culpability. Unfortunately, Davis's accusers are dishonest. Like Mike Nifong, the disgraced ex-D.A. in the Duke lacrosse case, their campaign to demonize their target ignores exculpatory evidence in their reckless rush to judgment. In order to smear Barack Obama through guilt-by-association with Frank Marshall Davis, they are virtually lynching Davis by grossly misrepresenting his character and influence.

Colonel Neville: Er, Duke Lacrosse and Frank Davis? False Dichotomy, pal. If I’m not mistaken, wasn’t the Duke Lacrosse case a classic of the largely Left Liberal MSM finding a perfect fit for their ideological paradigm of white racist’s against a black victim? But it was all utter hogwash. With Obama, the inverse is true.

The MSM has no interest in investigating Obama and Davis or anything that stinks of BO. Apart from the Conservative blogosphere,a few newspapers and books, FOX and Conservative talk back radio, the Davis and Obama dancing partnership is non-existent in the public mind. Logical Fallacy AND Cognitive Dissonance.

Jr: In "Sex Rebel," Davis's Bob Greene (not unlike Nabokov's Humbert Humbert) hesitates at a pubescent girl's sexual invitation, but foolishly relents. Like "Lolita," Davis's faux foreword is written by a Ph.D impersonator who details the psychological significance of the memoir.

Like Nabokov, Davis wanted to write under a pseudonym to shield his reputation, but felt compelled to reveal his authorship. As a result, however, Davis has been posthumously accused of pedophilia, while "Lolita" is "considered by many to be one of the finest novels written in the 20th century." In 1998, it was named the fourth greatest English language novels of the 20th century by the Modern Library," despite also being initially dismissed as pornography, according to Wikipedia.

Colonel Neville: Well, the similarities would be pathetically derivative of Nabokov then. Unlike Nabakov, Frank's pulp fiction sounds like laughable gutter rubbish. The reason Lolita is considered legitimate and superior and a great piece of literature, is because it is. It was written by an enormous talent. A possible reason for porn shop titled Sex Rebel, being unmissed and unvalued is because it was most likely spittle flecked tripe worth less than the brown paper wrapper that it and it's purchaser most likely came in.

Yep, I never read it. But then I’ve never read Lesbian Motorcyclists In Heat or Local Toilet Cruiser. The logic follows I am thus sadly unequipped to judge either, but I’m willing to take a punt. In short and the curlies, Davis or “Greene” is not “like Nabakov”, just as I am not “like” Babe Ruth and Neil Armstrong. By the way, where can I get a copy? For the er, historical importance you understand...

Nabakov shows his main character as a pitiful pervert and a dysfunctional cripple. Frank’s book seems a little like it was a celebration of the same flaws.

Jr: “This deliberate misrepresentation is only the latest in a long series of falsehoods by AIM professional prevaricators. Their "specific misrepresentation" is documented at I invite any person of integrity to refute my evidence against any of these AIM lies. If AIM had authentic evidence of Davis's radical influence, they would not need to fabricate such evidence.

Colonel Neville: But honestly, what would be their alleged motive exactly? Seems absurd and unlikely they would have one.

Jr: For objective articles on this issue, please see and [here].

Thank you, sir, for keeping an open mind (and blog) on this topic”.

Colonel Neville: Surprisingly polite of Mark considering the circumsatances. Well I try, but I don’t want my aching brain to fall out. The conundrum such as it is, is that look how Obama turned out and that's whether Davis was either a pot head Marxist loon or a Sunday School teacher. Didn't Obama know anyone balanced, normal, healthy and that you would trust? Without crazy pills?

Mark Davis has perhaps made a far better person out of himself than maybe his Pop became. He's done a Hell of a lot more than me. And that's what puzzles me. Quite frankly, the AIM article appears to be a rather short and to the point bit of clear reporting. Which parts are not true? All rather easy to cross reference, are they not? So, Frank Davis was maybe a tad little unsavoury and so is gosh, Obama, but with better tailoring. Anyhoo, “...authentic evidence of Davis's radical influence”[?] Hey, some “evidence” just came in! May I present to the court Exhibit BO.

Washington Times:

“His white grandfather, Stanley Dunham, was friends with Mr. Davis - both had roots reaching back to Kansas and had families of mixed races - and the black writer took an interest in Mr. Obama.

"Our grandfather - thought [Mr. Davis] was a point of connection, a bridge if you will, to the larger African-American experience for my brother," Maya Soetoro-Ng, Mr. Obama's half sister, said during a recent interview. Although Mr. Davis does not appear to have been a constant figure in his early life, Mr. Obama in his 1995 memoir, "Dreams From My Father," presents Mr. Davis - referred to in the book only as Frank - as an important influence who gave him advice about race and college”.

By: rozz62.

The list of Barack Obama’s radical associations is long and it keeps getting longer. Some are now well-known, but many are not. They need to be.

23 years at TUCC with Jeremiah Wright and James Meeks racist sermons. [On Youtube.] He chose the most radical church in the country; chose to immerse himself in hard-core ideological radicalism. Never before has this country considered such a radical leftist for its chief executive.

Michael Pfleger and his hateful and race-hating ramblings, Obama met while carrying out his own radical social activism as community organizer at ACORN, (radical organization.]

Penny Pritzker, heads Obama camp National Finance Committee was president of Superior Bank - massively failed and she literally bought her way out of jail paying $460 MILLION fine; was the very epicenter of subprime loan scandal” that would come to eat this nation’s financial system alive.

Fannie Mae CEO Jim Johnson, former head of Obama’s vice presidential selection committee, discovered he benefited from sweetheart loans from subprime king Countrywide.

Tony Rezko certainly and his federal indictments and financial dealing with Obamas of course and William Ayers, US terrorist bomber, Obama-co-lecturer, fellow board member, neighbor, and friend.

Communist Frank Marshall Davis, obama mentor; Saul Alinsky and Gerald Kellman (Kellman’s Woods Fund is how Obama hooked up with terrorist William Ayers].

Chicago lawyer Mazen Asbahi, appointed as Obama camp national coord for Muslim n affairs also stepped down after news about his stint on the fund’s board - which includes fundamentalist imam - prompting The Wall Street Journal inquiries about relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood and his long personal relationship with Hamas Jamal Said.

Obama desperately needs voters to forget he's the son of a Muslim father who served an incredibly brutal and corrupt Kenyan government; to forget he attended a madrassa in Indonesia and practiced Islam; forget that he campaigned in Kenya on behalf of Raila Odinga, who relied upon chaos, corruption, and violence in his campaign; numerous associations with radical Muslims; forget the photographs of Obama in traditional Muslim clothes, hanging with Muslim radicals such as Mazen Asbahi and anti-Semite Rashid Khalidi.

The mainstream media has frankly put the security of our great country at risk with an Obama coronation media like CNN & MSNBC is the only way Obama managed to steal the Dem nom. It’s extremely concerning that so many Americans could care less about who their candidate really is?? simply amazing and frankly scarey".

“Davis’ parting advice to young Obama: don’t “start believing what they tell you about equal opportunity and the American way and all that shit.” (Davis sounds like Michelle Obama, Farrakhan, and Jeremiah Wright). Don’t worry, Frank. Obama demonstrates every day in every way he has taken your advice, and your mentorship, deeply to what he uses for a heart”. Porcupinerim.

Beatnik hipster Jazz combo tribute to Frank Davis plus Davis himself. It's kind of fun especially as it's minus the Communism.


Mark said...

Tsk Tsk. Obviously you did not read the "specific misrepresentation" section of my blog, which identifies and refutes specific falshoods from AIM. Try this on for size (see

SYNOPSIS: By 1949, Roy Wilkins had become a vocal opponent of communist influence within the NAACP. According to board member Edward Berman, the Honolulu branch was also in conflict due to the infusion of purportedly “Stalinist” new members from the recently defunct Hawaii Association for Civil Unity (HUAC). Berman stated that Frank Marshall Davis appeared at ONE meeting to “propagandize the membership about our ‘racial problems’,” and was supported by the “Stalinist” group. Based Berman’s one letter to the NAACP describing the situation, AIM fabricated four different versions of Davis’s encounter with the Honolulu NAACP:

Fabricated Version #1 (“Obama’s Red Mentor Praised Red Army”): In this version, Berman criticized Davis for allegedly sneaking into NAACP meetings, while allegedly having the “avowed intent” of converting the same meetings.

Fabricated Version #2 (“Obama Plays Reagan In Berlin, Al-Jazeera Journalist Funds Campaign”): Davis allegedly tries to take over meetings instead of sneaking into them.

Fabricated Version #3 (“Return of the Dupes and the Anti-Anti-Communists”): Roy Wilkins supposedly criticized Davis directly when he “rightly noted of Davis and his comrades: they would now destroy the local branch of the NAACP."

Fabricated Version #4 (“AP Lies About Obama’s Red Mentor”): In this account Davis tried to take over the NAACP itself!

Obviously not all accounts can be true. Even without reviewing the testimony, it should be readily apparent to an objective observer that some must be misrepresentations. In fact, ALL are misrepresentations ("lies" in case "Colonel" Neville misunderstands)

Here is the source document containing the actual Congressional testimony of Edward Berman:

If you compare the source document to the AIM misrepresentation, the lies are obvious. I invited anyone to refute the SPECIFIC MISREPRESENTATION I have identified. Drawing straw man conclusions, and then refuting your own conclusions, is not refuting the specific misrepresentation documented on my blog, "Colonel" Neville. (Also, please don't confuse the quotation from AIM's expert Edgar Tidwell with my own writing, as you have done in your most recent post.)

If you want to refute my list of SPECIFIC MISRERESENTATION, please refer to them by item number, as I have done in my blog.

Mark said...

Here are the LIES of fabricated version #1:

Fabricated Version #1: In his report “Obama’s Red Mentor Praised Red Army,” AIM’s Cliff Kincaid claimed: “The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HCUA) took testimony in 1950 from a member of the Honolulu branch of the NAACP, Edward Berman, who referred to "Comrade Davis" as someone who "sneaked" into the NAACP meetings "with the avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line."

In this version, Berman supposedly criticized Davis for allegedly sneaking into NAACP meetings, while allegedly having the “avowed intent” of converting the same meetings.


a. Contrary to Kincaid’s claims, Berman’s testimony did NOT claim:

i. Davis “sneaked” into any meeting

ii. Davis attended more than this one meeting

iii. Davis had “the avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line.”

b. Kincaid’s claim is inherently absurd. If a person has “the avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line,” they could hardly “sneak” into a meeting.

c. Berman’s letter stated that Davis WAS SUPPORTED BY OTHERS who RECENTLY "sneaked" into meetings "with the avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line. Kincaid misrepresented the others’ purpose as Davis’s purpose.

Mark said...

Here are the LIES of fabricated version #2:

In his report “Obama Plays Reagan In Berlin, Al-Jazeera Journalist Funds Campaign,” Kincaid makes a slightly different claim. In this version, he states “We already knew Davis was a Stalinist. NAACP member Edward Berman testified that "comrade Davis" tried to take over meetings of the organization in Hawaii "for the purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line."

Note that in this version, Davis did not “sneak” into meetings. Instead he allegedly tried to take over meetings.


a. We do not know that Davis was a "Stalinist." He actually criticized Stalin, by name, in his writing.

b. In this version, Kincaid changes his misrepresentation of Berman’s letter from saying that Davis “sneaked” into meetings, to saying that Davis “tried to take over meetings.” In fact, Berman’s letter did not say either of these.

c. Berman did NOT testify that Davis tried to take over meetings at all, much less taking over meetings "for the purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line."

d. Berman mentioned Davis at only one meeting, not “meetings,”

e. In Berman's words, the only action Davis took was when he "suddenly appeared on the scene to propagandize the membership about our `racial problems' here in Hawaii." Berman does NOT connect Davis with trying to convert “it into a front for the Stalinist line.”

f. Romerstein's research reveals that Berman said that at ONE meeting, Davis was SUPPORTED BY OTHERS who recently "sneaked" into the NAACP meetings "with the avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line. Kincaid therefore misrepresents the Berman testimony in at least four ways:

i. Berman testified about Davis's presence at one meeting, not "meetings" as falsely claimed by Kincaid.

ii. According to Berman, Davis did not try to "take over" this or any other meeting, as falsely claimed by Kincaid. He only "appeared on the scene to propagandize" about racial problems.

iii. Kincaid completely misrepresents Berman’s assessment of Davis’s purpose. Davis’s purpose, according to Berman, was to propagandize about racial problems. According to Berman, Davis did NOT attend the meeting "for the purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line.” Davis was only supported by OTHERS who had RECENTLY sneaked into meetings (not this meeting) with the "avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line." In changing the subject from “others” to Davis, Kincaid also changes “avowed intent and purpose” into just “purpose.” With this change, Kincaid completely misrepresents Berman’s assessment of Davis’s purpose.

iv. Further, Kincaid failed to mention the context of Berman's remarks, including the fact that Berman was a rookie member of the Board, and a Caucasian who believed there was NO segregation in Hawaii. Even decades later, some landlords refused to rent to people of certain ethnic groups.

Mark said...

Fabricated Version #3 (“Return of the Dupes and the Anti-Anti-Communists”): The most outrageous version comes from AIM guest columnist Paul Kengor: “Finally, if that doesn't concern liberals, they should understand how communists, including Frank Marshall Davis, used the civil-rights movement, and again and again exploited and undermined the NAACP. Romerstein lays this out at length in his report. He quotes Roy Wilkins of the NAACP, who rightly noted of Davis and his comrades: "they would now destroy the local branch of the NAACP." They would do so after having destroyed another good civil-rights organization. "Comrade Davis," wrote Wilkins, "was supported by others who recently ‘sneaked' into the organization with the avowed intent and purpose of converting it into a front for the Stalinist line." Wilkins knew well that this was a standard "tactic" by the communists; it was known by everyone involved in the NAACP at the time. Wilkins, like many civil-rights leaders of his time, refused to be duped by Davis and his comrades.”

Note that in this version, Roy Wilkins, instead of Berman, allegedly criticized Davis.
FACTS: The letter was written TO Roy Wilkins, not BY Roy Wilkins. Wilkins had a reputation of denouncing communists within the civil rights movement. Falsely attributing these remarks to Wilkins greatly enhanced their credibility. I can find no evidence in this report that Wilkins had any opinion of Davis.

Mark said...

Fabricated Version #4: In his report “AP Lies About Obama’s Red Mentor,” Kincaid give a fourth version: “AP doesn’t note the evidence that Davis and his comrades tried to take over the NAACP in order to transform its Honolulu branch into a front for the Stalinist line.”

Note that in this fantasy account, Davis allegedly tried to take over the NAACP itself!

FACTS: In fact, there is no such evidence. Kincaid is AGAIN misrepresenting the testimony of Edward Berman, rookie board member of the Honolulu NAACP! Romerstein’s research only indicates that Davis “suddenly appeared on the scene to propagandize the membership about our “racial problems” in Hawaii. According to Romerstein’s research, Davis did NOTHING to take over the NAACP or any of its branches to transform it into a front for the Stalinist line.

Once again, the original Congressional testimony, provided by Kincaid's own researcher, is at

You will see that AIM was very creative in reporting Berman's testimony. Their creativity was expressed as lies.

Once again: if you are going to challenge what I posted, please challenge my actual posts rather than your inferences regarding my intent.

Mark said...

One more thing: If you expect me to debate issues other than the documented SPECIFIC MISREPRESENTATION, please number each issue to simplify cross-referencing.

Mark said...

I am disappointed, "Colonel," that instead of attempting to refute any of these SPECIFIC MISREPRESENTATIONS, you instead chose to start another ranting post. This suggests you may be incapable of rational debate on the issues involved.

If you took the time to examine the NAACP case, you would find that each of the four AIM posts contained lies concerning the Congressional testimony of Edward Berman. AIM claimed that Berman made numerous statements about Davis that Berman never made, such as Davis trying to take over the NAACP, etc. THAT is my point. Is this too difficult for you to understand?

Truth Patrol said...

Did AIM tell the truth, or did AIM lie, about Berman's testimony? It's as simple as that.

Mark said...

Yes, AIM lied in each of their four fabricated versions. There are at least three distinct lies in fabricated version #1, and more in the other fabricated versions. There are probably at least ten AIM lies regarding Berman's testimony alone.

It's like finding Easter eggs!

Colonel Robert Neville said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Colonel Robert Neville said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Colonel Robert Neville said...

Mark Davis, [the son of Frank Marshall Davis] extensively corresponded with me on his screwy Dad, is either incredibly, impossibly deluded about his fathers non-commieness and his relationship to Obama or...
Mark Davis is a deliberate serial lying leftist himself.

All has been exposed in a new empirical book by Paul Kengore... 'Communist: Frank Marshall Davis: the untold story of Barack Obama's mentor.'

Here is an audio of Mark Levin interviewing Paul Kengore.

17 minutes of startling sourced easily verifiable facts that fit perfectly with what AIM and me have written, and are diametrically opposed to what Mark Davis and Obama have said.

Here is a three part Glenn Beck video interview with Paul Kengore.

I despise phony Marxist leftist frauds.

No, really. Colonel Neville

Blogger said...

eToro is the ultimate forex trading platform for newbie and professional traders.

Blogger said...

Did you think about choosing the best Bitcoin exchange service - YoBit.

Blogger said...

At Free Bitcoin you can recieve free satoshis. Up to 22 satoshis every 5 minutes.