Le Colonel Neville s’habille Tojours Pour le Diner. Semper Fi. Thomas Sowell: "There are three questions that I think would destroy most of the arguments on the left. The first is compared to what? The second is at what cost and the third is what hard evidence do you have?” Live free or die or both. Satirical empirical conservative. No, really.
Tuesday 7 April 2009
"Islam is waging a 1300 year old asymmetrical war for a global Islamic caliphate from without and within America.” Obama if he wasn't a dirty liar.
Barry Hussein Sotoero Barack Obama: "Gobble gobble!"
King Pervert Abdullah: "Hey let me fully unzip first!"
Yes, if only Barry Hussein Sotouero Barack Obama wasn't a dirty lying dhimmi, a crypto-Marxist Muslim and an embarrassingly brittle narcissistic and super incompetent coward.
Yep, Barry said in his uber-cognitive dissonant PC way that “...the United States “is not and will never be at war with Islam.” Barry bullshit. Gee, I'll let all those people that have been beheaded and blown up know immediately.
Gee, whose attacking us then? Oh, just some mistaken "people" that we all "misunderstand" that we can't even name or recognise. Amazingly, they're all consistently and fanatically propelled without let-up, by the SAME IDENTICAL er, "twisting" of lovely Islam. An incredible 1300 year old coincidence! Another fantastic coincidence is that they look, speak, think, plan, live and act the same, just like golly, Muslims! And this is just like Mohammad and as the Koran explicitly says to!
Amazing! But just a coincidence.
Sadly old boy, Islam declared war on everything and everyone not Muslim and Islamic over a thirteen hundred years ago, and in a billions of ways since, has continued their ETERNAL WAR against the non-Islamic world. Millions of Muslims commit to this relentless jihad twenty four hours a day, seven days a week and year after year at some stage or another, in most every country and state in the world.
Imagine it being 1944 and FDR saying “The United States is not and will never be at war war with Nazism, the code of Bushido, Emperor worship and Shintoism, fascism or Communism.”
And the MSM reporting straight faced that FDR was: “Calling for a greater partnership with the Axis world in an address to the Reichstag. FDR called Nazi Germany, Imperial Japan and fascist Italy, important U.S. allies in many areas, including the fight against World War 11.
He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and fascism, portraying terrorist groups such as the Wehrmacht, the SS and Kamikaze pilots as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Axis forces.
“Let me say this as clearly as I can,” FDR said. “The United States is not and never will be at war with Nazism, fascism or Bushido, which is a religion of peace. In fact, our partnership with the Nazi world is critical...in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all totalitarian political projects reject.”
Colonel Neville: Hey, whatever big lie works for the current suicidal PC facade. Gee, how long will this fraud work? Well, Muslims have committed over 13,000 reported terrorist attacks since 9/11 and yet, the seemingly simple and direct statement of “kill the kaffir and infidel!” backed up by relentless MUSLIM ACTIONS, still doesn’t register with many. Go figure.
Here's more of B.O's crawling spineless lying dhimmi speech at this link, with lot's of drivel like we're all the same and "we pray to the same God", "I believe that Islam is a great religion that preaches peace", a "Muslim partnership" etc. All absolute moral equvalence bunk of course, so no. And as per usual, that the free West has caused Muslim resentment by Muslims murdering thousands of civilians and so on, in much the same way that armed bank robbers are often angry at bank staff.
Obama said and I kid you not: “There is an old Turkish proverb: ‘You cannot put out fire with flames." But Jihadist Muslims try, don't they?
Barry: "But force alone cannot solve our problems, and it is no alternative to extremism. The future must belong to those who create, not those who destroy. That is the future we must work for, and we must work for it together."
Yes, whenever you meet an violent extremist, reach out and talk to them and mot of all listen! To your own screaming as your head comes off. Yes, passive suicide and slaughter of the self is the best eh? Gee, didn't "those who create" build the World Trade Centre, Vienna and the giant Buddha?
And didn't golly, extremists either destroy or lay siege to them? And gee, isn't it clear from Obama's disgusting words and embarrassing cowardly behaviour, that "the future" belongs to the most violent Muslims? For Islam, violence and murder works EVERYTIME. Instant Western apology and concessions!
Yes, and what is it exactly, that the Muslim world last created beyond lies, oppression, dysfunction, irrationality, madness, violence, perversion and death? Zero, literally.
Via Amazon reviews on Stealth Jihad by Robert Spencer:
“Most terrorism experts agree: it is not "if" we are attacked again, but "when." Yet the assault has already happened. A silent battle is being waged on our nation everyday. Not with guns and bombs, but via covert sources: Islamic charities, the ACLU--even presidential candidates. They are all pawns in a stealth holy war.
Unwittingly advancing the jihadist agenda not by violence, but through endeavors designed to acclimate and subject us to Islamic law--just the way Osama bin Laden wants it. In Stealth Jihad, bestselling author Robert Spencer exposes how a silent but lethal movement is advancing on the U.S. and calls upon Americans to resist it--before it's too late.”
From the Inside Flap.
Does America face a jihadist threat that's even bigger than terrorism?
While our homeland security efforts are focused on preventing terrorist attacks, another jihadist threat is growing right here in America--in plain sight.
In Stealth Jihad, Islam expert and New York Times bestselling author Robert Spencer blows the whistle on a long-term plot by Islamic jihadists to undermine the United States. This effort aims not to bring America to its knees through attacks with guns or bombs, but to subvert the country from within--by gradually Islamizing America. The ultimate goal, the stealth jihadists themselves declare, is nothing less than the adoption of Islamic law in the United States.
Describing the disturbing ease with which stealth jihadists have already become ensconced in the American political and media landscapes, Spencer exposes the full modus operandi of the movement as revealed in a stunning document unveiled in a recent terrorism funding trial. In this unsettling book, he explains:
* Which Islamic fundamentalist organization is behind the stealth jihad.
* How stealth jihadists have reinvented themselves as mainstream civil rights activists--despite their many past declarations of Islamic supremacism.
* How stealth jihadists played a key role in formulating U.S. government guidelines for the War on Terror.
* How insistence on "accommodating" Islamic cultural and religious practices in America is part of a calculated strategy to achieve a dangerous larger agenda.
* The effort by stealth jihadists to whitewash the teaching of Islam in schools.
* What can be done to defeat the stealth jihad and preserve America's liberty
America, Spencer demonstrates, is all but oblivious to a new kind of threat presented by a loosely organized movement whose activists are well funded, highly motivated, and relentless in pursuit of their agenda. This book is a wake-up call for a country so focused on foreign threats that it has left itself vulnerable to a growing danger much closer to home.”
Hotairs Ed Morrissey get’s it almost right on how George Bush spouted the same wilfully ignorant PC nonsense and blather, on how Islam is just dandy. The Ed spoils it all with a phony or is it stupid?, caveat of his own:
“And he’s right; the last thing we would want to do would be to declare war on a billion people just on the basis of their religion.
Colonel Neville: Hey, but it's OK if millions of Muslims worldwide have declared war on us, and most Muslim states either support it overtly or covertly in some way. Check. Nuance.
Ed: "The more we can keep the Muslims on the sidelines, the better off we are in fighting against the radicals.”
Colonel Neville: That entire sentence is an absurd fantasy entirely without merit or empirical evidence, cos there is none. But there's lotsa dark laughs!]
So balls and utter nonsense. WE ARE AT WAR, but unlike WWll, we are under attack globally and domestically with an overwhelming level of infiltration, self-delusion and out and out LIES that is beyond belief. And if we had the same kind of dominant super denial in WWll, without a doubt WE WOULD HAVE LOST.
Hotair: “Barack Obama, making his first visit to a Muslim nation as president, declared Monday the United States “is not and will never be at war with Islam.”
Calling for a greater partnership with the Islamic world in an address to the Turkish parliament, Obama called the country an important U.S. ally in many areas, including the fight against terrorism. He devoted much of his speech to urging a greater bond between Americans and Muslims, portraying terrorist groups such as Al Qaida as extremists who did not represent the vast majority of Muslims.
“Let me say this as clearly as I can,” Obama said. “The United States is not and never will be at war with Islam. In fact, our partnership with the Muslim world is critical...in rolling back a fringe ideology that people of all faiths reject.”
Here’s the objectionable part:
The U.S. president is trying to mend fences with a Muslim world that felt it had been blamed by America for the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.
Yes, because George Bush spent the last seven years blaming the entire Muslim world for the 9/11 attacks, right? Right? Er, no, as this collection of Bush quotes regarding Islam makes excruciatingly clear. In fact, Bush emphasized friendship with Muslims from the very start of the war:
• “I’ve made it clear, Madam President, that the war against terrorism is not a war against Muslims, nor is it a war against Arabs. It’s a war against evil people who conduct crimes against innocent people.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush and President Megawati of Indonesia The Oval Office, Washington, D.C. September 19, 2001.
• “The face of terror is not the true faith of Islam. That’s not what Islam is all about. Islam is peace. These terrorists don’t represent peace. They represent evil and war.” — Remarks by the President at Islamic Center of Washington, D.C. Washington, D.C. September 17, 2001.
• “All of us here today understand this: We do not fight Islam, we fight against evil.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush to the Warsaw Conference on Combating Terrorism November 6, 2001.
• “I have assured His Majesty that our war is against evil, not against Islam. There are thousands of Muslims who proudly call themselves Americans, and they know what I know — that the Muslim faith is based upon peace and love and compassion. The exact opposite of the teachings of the Al Qaeda organization, which is based upon evil and hate and destruction.” — Remarks by President George W. Bush and His Majesty King Abdullah of Jordan The Oval Office, Washington, D.C. September 28, 2001.
• “Islam is a vibrant faith. Millions of our fellow citizens are Muslim. We respect the faith. We honor its traditions. Our enemy does not. Our enemy doesn’t follow the great traditions of Islam. They’ve hijacked a great religion.” – Remarks by President George W. Bush on U.S. Humanitarian Aid to Afghanistan Presidential Hall, Dwight David Eisenhower Executive Office Building, Washington, D.C. October 11, 2002.
And so on; there are plenty of examples to make the point. Obama spoke in the tradition established by Bush over the last seven-plus years of emphasizing that America did not declare war on Islam. That’s been obvious through our partnership with Islamic nations, such as Iraq, Turkey, Afghanistan, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, just to name a few. And he’s right; the last thing we would want to do would be to declare war on a billion people just on the basis of their religion. The more we can keep the Muslims on the sidelines, the better off we are in fighting against the radicals.
However, the AP wants to pretend that this is some new effort by the US to assure Muslims of our intentions. It decidedly is not, and perhaps a mention that Bush tried making these same assurances for almost his entire presidency would be in order here.” Ed Morrissey still not admitting the bleeding obvious.
Ralph White review of Stealth Jihad:
“Robert Spencer describes an America that welcomes its mortal enemies into its midst, gives them equal time with our founders' ideals, and defends their right to hate us. Spencer is a veteran of the struggle against jihad; his previously published titles include "The Truth About Muhammad," "The Politically Incorrect Guide to Islam, and the Crusades," "Religion of Peace, Why Christianity is and Islam isn't," "The Myth of Islamic Tolerance," and "Islam Unveiled..."
Spencer adds his voice to Islam's courageous adversaries, Ayaan Hirsi Ali, Brigitte Gabriel, Mark Steyn, Bruce Bawer, Carafano and Rosenweig, Benjamin and Simon, Efraim Karsh, Mary Habeck. Take the time to understand Spencer's and these other authors' warnings; distill their thoughts; and join the resistance to Islam's malevolent spread in America. France and Holland are already past the tipping point and will have some form of sharia law within 50 years. If you don't think it can happen here in America consider the Minnesota taxi incidents of 2006.
One taxi driver refused to pick up passengers carrying alcoholic beverages at the Minneapolis airport because to do so would "insult Islam." Soon other drivers joined the embargo against passengers with alcohol.
The city tried a system using different colored taxis to accommodate the drivers who were and weren't willing to transport alcohol, but the system broke down. Within three months 5,400 passengers were denied service. The drivers claimed that they were defending "freedom of religion." In fact, Spencer shows that no one was preventing the drivers from practicing Islam.
What the drivers were doing was "asserting sharia norms over non-Muslims." Had the precedent been allowed, what was to prevent drivers from refusing to carry passengers with pork products, or an unmarried couple?
Spencer shows that it is the Muslim Brotherhood, founded in 1928 in Egypt by Hassan al Banna, which is directing these and other incursions into the unalienable rights which Americans blithely take for granted. The Muslim American Society is the Brotherhood's front organization in America, and the Council of Islamic-American Relations is its political arm. These organizations reject peaceful coexistence, [promote] moral equivalence, and reject pluralistic governance. Resistance to jihad is not bigoted, racist, hate mongering, or Islamophobic; it is self defence against the war Muslims are obliged to wage against us. For them to live peacefully with us is to insult the prophet Muhammad.
You will not have to believe Spencer. His argument is most forcefully made by Islam's governance documents, the Qur'an and the Hadith (traditions of the prophet), and by Muslim writers and speakers themselves. Spencer quotes Islam's words verbatim and shows that there is no scope for compromise in the mandate to convert us, extract jizya (humiliating tax on non-Muslims), or kill us. These are their sole options and they mean business. America's very openness, its civil rights, its democratic ideals and institutions, and its tolerance create a vulnerability which Muslims use against us.”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Download the Japanese Adult Videos: http://tinyurl.com/clrplv
Post a Comment