Sunday, 4 November 2007

How To Stop Muslim Homicide-Suicide Bombers Dead Or Alive.

The earliest example of Islamic scholars actually writing down the Krazy Koran dates from about 1203. Here is a very early photograph of the great Muslim historian Mohammad Mohammed Cyril Bin Cheeta putting down for posterity, the posterior of Islam. He's using a Little Dhimmi Killer typewriter and was photographed using a Mecca 700 camera. Both of course were invented by Mohammad, the greatest man of all time in some kind of alternate and insane parallel universe.

"That ain't workin', this is how ya do it, this is how ya do it and get ya chic's for free". If you're a Sharia jihad martyr, apparently about 72 and all child-virgin's.  

But I digress. First you make the following state policy and proclaim it loudly as General Pershing did. Then follow it to the letter and show that you have indeed done so. After any Sharia jihadist psychopath has spread the beautiful message of peace that is Mad Mohammad via "the filth of the Koran" as Chris Hitchens called it, by blowing themselves up and hideously maiming and murdering as many people of all races, religions and types as possible, thus ruining societies and thousands of lives much as they have in their own neighborhood of Gods monkey house, this my friends is what you do, and simple is best like a perfected, clear block and punch to the head.

Gather up all the pieces of the deluded ones and then simply feed all terrorist body parts to pigs and bomb Jihad Central with pigs blood n' guts. It WILL work.

Even the most insane of Islam freaks will not like the idea of spending the next few years as part of a pork and ham machine’s molecular structure, instead of gaining the only 100 percent guarantee of Paradise available to Muslim men as stated in Islam, and due entirely to violent martyrdom. Of course, a certain amount ends up as swine crap but I feel bombers can’t be chooser’s. Dig the auto responses! “Eek! That’s monstrous!” Stop the rather more monstrous girls school bombings then.

Now I don’t care what happens to the kind of committed and should be monsters who are comfortable, gleeful, nay, orgasmic and exultant at the idea of for example, blasting twenty seven Iraqi children while these kids were getting candy from US marines in 2006. Then a second bacterium blew himself up as people came running to help! Or the garbage that detonated a car among one hundred lunching Iraqi schoolgirls, then rammed a second waiting car bomb into the fleeing chaos of the terrified and hideously mauled school children. These are only two of the over 21,000 known global Islamic terror attacks since 9/11. [See thereligionofpeace com and jihadwatch org etc.]

I seek no refuge in the nauseating and common currency of moral relativism because there is none. I look into Islam and see the abyss, nothing more. Don't you? The factory output of ifs, buts, because and maybes, are all wholly unconvincing. I find Islam unconvincingly Holy or is it convincingly unholy? Islam uses human beings to oppress and kill other human beings. Islam is even unbelievably worse than the polished turd of communism. There is not even the absurd fantasy economics. It's a mad dream with no redeeming features whatsoever. It's all about death. This world has no value to Islam beyond a battle ground for Dar Islam.

This world is merely the Koranic Ticket Master outlet for a trip to pervert heaven loaded with virgins meaning delightfully, both boy and girl booze, drugs and the rest of the enormously hypocritical and disgusting debauchery promised by Mo. Er, gee, all the things that Islam strictly prohibits and denounces in relentless, rabid ranting here on earth. Islam is a terminal contradiction.

The message is clear. It is entirely and utterly, diversionary, disingenuous, lazy and researched free to say this is not Islam simply because it’s big, bad, ugly and frightening. This is the lovely truth we have all come to enjoy. Yep, there are millions of very nice and decent Muslims in the world, though not a lot protesting against Islamic terror it seems...but never mind. I believe you are a moderate Muslim in direct proportion to how little you have fully embraced the faith of Islam.

Now moderate means “without ideology and willing to compromise”. Gee, now there’s an embarrassing problem right there. Surely no true Muslim is willing to compromise their beliefs and especially once they get power. Definitely not like the self-imploding and self-abasing dhimmi’s of the West, who believe utterly in every religion and culture but their own. Islam is not a fluffy try on that ya just pick up and then breezily decide otherwise. “Um, er, Islam's not really for me anymore. I can’t stand the blood and screaming”.

There is one God subscribed to in Islam and that’s the Allah one and they'll kill you for allowing your subscription to slip. Sure, you can criticize Islam. Knock yourself out. But then they still kill you. Yep, there are moderate Muslims but thus they are apostates. Thus they usually live under er, pressure, are tortured and murdered or exiled if they're lucky. And they've either left Islam or are about to and commonly become Christian, as one can't replace a life of Islam with amorphous thin gruel of secularism. Or they now live entirely in the West, often in hiding. The first people targeted for assassination by the hot for jihad boys are ‘moderate’ Muslims and don’t you ever forget it.

Aye, there’s the rub. If the Krazy Koran came straight from Allah, old Allah really needs a short course in creative writing. Maybe I’ll send crazy old Al a night school pamphlet. The weak-minded, spineless and silly brim with auto denial in the face of a massive Himalaya of relentless, daily, historical and present empirical evidence to the contrary. But instant subject change is the way of those infected with the virus of moral relativism. It’s automatic for a very good reason.

If such dupes and dhimmi’s accept that totalitarian jihadist goals are a real and present danger and they mean everything they say, which it does and is always backed up with action, well, the same fools and frauds would have to start admitting to a lot of lies, delusions, monstrous mistakes, support for evil and other mad political posturing. Then the whole facade would unravel pretty damn quickly.

Aah, the eternal Student Union crisis meeting and Hall of Mirrors that is the left of today. If ever a shriveled shrub needed whacking, that would be it. Now beyond the raw material of pure radical gold it invariably supplies, I don't care how any of the mediocrities of the left may respond, if they do at all. I don’t need to concern myself with being startled by any sudden bright lights of maturity and adulthood that may arise unexpectedly, out of the rhetorical gloom. Won’t happen sports.

Now, it’s exactly the same with the freakoid sadists and perverts of Sharia jihad. I’m growing tired of making the slim and shady differentiation between Islam and Islamism. There ain’t one really, unless you find nuance of note between Nazi and Nazism, communist and communism or rape and rapine. It’s merely a matter of study and commitment to the very intensely proscribed doctrines of Islam. Islam? No, it’s a' beef!

Many an outpatient of the intellect are intensely passionate in order to avoid seeing the causes of their own ignorance, which are usually and clearly all around 'em. Islam is not beyond criticism but capable only of being criticized. It’s never a comfortable fit because everything about it is problematic, especially when placed in the middle of the normal. It’s the turd in the swimming pool.

In the West, we’re still almost allowed to criticize religion but only Christianity. All the rad young twerps that glibly say anything they want to about Christianity are completely silent on Islam. Except of course for apologizing for it. No matter what daily abominations or atrocities there’s always a ready cliche of denial ready. The embarrassing fraud that it’s somehow risky to criticize Christianity. Daring rebels! What a fraud. Vale faux rebels. Get ya fake dissident cred elsewhere, ya creeps.

Everyone lives in fear of the Salvation Army, the Catholic Church, Anglicans and those two old ladies, the pimply youth and the fat guy from the Seventh Day Adventists. Nope. “Now deary, I heard you say that Jesus was a bum and the church stunk, so if you still come to our Thursday night Mechanics Hall meeting, there’s no fruit cake for you!”

Yes, Dave Allen lives in terror to this day, of hearing a chocolate biscuit eating pensioner's withered and liver spotted knuckles rapping feebly on his door. Er, no. The left is in the not that new a position for them of defending the indefensible, of tolerating the intolerant, of pretending the inhuman is human. As they did with Soviet mass murder and Nazism even before the Hitler Stalin Pact, Red China purges and the Cultural Revolution, Fidel and Che the child killer murder sprees and sympathy for the Devil of North Korea etc. Classics in the hideous and twisted diaries leftism, but not the complete or even the end of the story.

These events plus millions more horrible, sad and anonymous episodes are what eagerly annihilated over one hundred million people. In the remaining commie and socialist hellholes around the world, this is happening right now in fact. No wonder the left and Islam are such comfortable bedfellows.

How many lives has Islam destroyed, oppressed, perverted, tortured, murdered and consumed? After 1400 years, who knows? 170 million black Africans, 80 million Hindu's, three million in Darfur etc and counting. What has Islam achieved that it did not steal or usurp from the productive and creative? Nothing. It’s a very long lie and and one of two biggest cover ups in history. Islamic totalitarian states have an exciting and apocalyptic plan for the future and we’re all invited whether we want to be or not. One day in the perhaps not so distant future, you will be shocked and surprised to see how quickly the police and civilian services are overwhelmed and reduced to protecting themselves and their families just like in France, Belgium and the UK etc.

So on that day do remember to bring a gift, perhaps a little something self-loading an' automatic or maybe a tasteful array of Claymore mines. They're always nice. Mebbe the Little Roaster Flamethrower. I know I will if I can, but it’s highly unlikely in the now largely Unarmed States of Australia.

Here is a wonderful post from Bob at onecosmos blogspot. It's excellent. Dig.

Wednesday, September 26, 2007.

Islamists and Leftists have a "logic" that serves their needs, not truth.With projection and denial prominent.

In the unconscious mind, where symmetrical logic rules the night, the stronger the emotion one is feeling, the more "symmetrical deductions" are likely to occur. For example, as Bomford writes, on a deep unconscious level, "one who hates has to believe that his or her hatred is returned".

Note that this is a logical operation, only based upon a different sort of logic. This logic is no doubt the source of the psychotic fear of Israel in the Islamic world. Their unconscious hatred is so profound that it simultaneously reverses the relation, so that they can't help perceiving that Israel hates them. But Israelis just want to shop, raise their families, or read the Torah. They couldn't care less about Muslims, except to the extent that bloodthirsty Muslim barbarians harbor murderous rage toward them.

It's fine to hate evil, but in the Islamic world, what is hated is transformed into evil. Something is not hated because it is evil, but evil because it is hated. One could say the same of the left, which habitually fears what it eternally hates. The left cannot be comprehended unless one appreciates the extent of their unbound hatred. Once this is grasped, what seems illogical is suddenly seen to obey the dictates of symmetrical logic.

For example, the unconscious feeling that I hate America and want us to lose in Iraq is transformed to General Petraeus is a traitor, or I am a racist becomes America is racist, or I am unbearably envious becomes the wealthy are engaged in class warfare against me!

Another characteristic of the unconscious is that it is timeless, in the sense that it can reverse temporal relations. For example, in the unconscious mind, if A is the cause of B, B can also be the cause of A. Thus, "before" and "after" become meaningless. Therefore, although we were inexcusably attacked by Islamists on 9-11, within minutes, leftists were saying that the real reason for the attack was that we had done something to offend Muslims.

Likewise, throughout the Cold War, leftist scholars wrote "revisionist" histories, in which the United States was the cause of the Cold War, or at least equally responsible for it. You will notice that there are no conservative revisionists who write, for example, that blacks were the cause of their own lynching, or that Japanese Americans were the cause of their own internment. You can only think in this manner if you are pathologically under the sway of unconscious symmetrical logic.

Also in the unconscious mind, there is no distinction between the memory of something that actually occurred vs. the memory of a fantasy. Here we can understand how and why the left is so prone to mythologizing the past, as their fantasies are mingled with reality. Thus, no amount of reality and asymmetrical logic will ever convince them that FDR made the Great Depression worse, not better, or that the black family only began to disintegrate after the imposition of all the "Great Society" programs of the mid to late '60s.

No amount of logic could convince a leftist that his policies harm the "little guy," since his ruling myth, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, is that he is here to rescue the hapless little guy (for whom the leftist always feels rich contempt in the unconscious mind, contempt which only seeps out everywhere).

One thing you will notice about the left is that they are passionate. Because the left is guided by feelings and intentions, they are blind to the results of their actions. If their feelings are infinitely good, then in the unconscious mind, the results must also be infinitely good.

As I have written before, this is a religious passion in the absence of religion, so it has no traditional means to structure and channel it. Just as religion partakes of symmetrical logic in an adaptive way (i.e., the meek shall inherit the earth, the Golden Rule, humans are made in the image of the Creator, etc.), leftists do so in a terribly unhealthy way.

That is, because of the intensity of their feelings, these feelings reach way down into the symmetrical realm, with no way to structure or make sense of them. This is why you always see so much highly charged, "unfiltered" unconscious material coming out of the left. To borrow a metaphor from someone, reading dailykos or huffington post is like taking a ride through a sewer in a glass bottom boat.


Colonel Robert Neville said...

Dear sports, here's a thought. Most if not all Western Left Liberal and Radical twerps, are almost defined by avidly promoting and theorising on violent revolution, but mostly for other people.

They have little to no intention of ever experiencing it first hand, or ever permanently living in the resulting vortex.

Colonel Neville.

Ewan said...

As Robert Spencer has said, "Whilst there are peaceful and moderate Muslims, there is no such thing as peaceful and moderate Islam."

Colonel Robert Neville said...

Dear sports, here's a nice piece from Christopher Hitchen's on The Barbary Pirates and Thomas Jefferson. Aah, Islam was ever thus...

" cannot get around what Jefferson heard when he went with John Adams to wait upon Tripoli’s ambassador to London in March 1785.

When they inquired by what right the Barbary states preyed upon American shipping, enslaving both crews and passengers, America’s two foremost envoys were informed that...

“it was written in the Koran, that all Nations who should not have acknowledged their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon whoever they could find and to make Slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.”

Colonel Robert Neville said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Colonel Robert Neville said...

Dear sports, here's a nice link to a recent Pew survey of Muslim attitudes to things. Gee, what a surprise! There's more than enough candidates for thousands of crime and Saudi funded terror acts, the required support networks, most any level of insurrection, civil war and Islamic Glee Clubs.

Colonel Neville.

Colonel Robert Neville said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Faultline USA said...

Good article. Consider joining the Christians Against Leftist Heresy Blogroll at

The Basseteer said...

Re your idea about feeding terrorist body part to pigs. Great idea and could be a better deterrent than trying to understand the terrorists' grievances and what we've done to upset them!

Here's another similar porcine idea from

General Pershing was born September 13th, 1860 near Laclede, MS. He died July 15th, 1948 in Washington, DC.

Highlights of his life include:

1891 Professor of Military Science and Tactics University of Nebraska

1898 Serves in the Spanish-American War

1901 Awarded rank of Captain

1906 Promoted to rank of Brig. General

1909 Military Governor of Moro Province, Philippines

1916 Made Major General

1919 Promoted to General of the Armies

1921 Appointed Chief of Staff

1924 Retires from active duty Education West Point.

Just before World War I, there were a number of terrorist attacks on the United States forces in the Philippines by Muslim extremists.

So General Pershing captured 50 terrorists, and had them tied to posts for execution. He then had his men bring in two pigs and slaughter them in front of the, now horrified, terrorists.

Muslims detest pork, because they believe pigs are filthy animals. Some of them simply refuse to eat it, while others won't even touch pigs at all, nor any of their by-products.

To them, eating or touching a pig, its meat, its blood, etc., is to be instantly barred from Paradise (and those virgins), and doomed to hell.

The soldiers then soaked their bullets in the pigs' blood, and proceeded to execute 49 of the terrorists by firing squad.

The soldiers then dug a big hole, dumped in the terrorist's bodies, and covered them in pig blood, entrails, etc. They let the 50th man go.

And for the next 42 years, there was not a single Muslim extremist attack anywhere in the world.

Maybe it is time for this segment of history to repeat itself, maybe in Iraq? The question is, where do we find another Black Jack Pershing?

"Keep your 72 virgins, I want 36 sluts"- The Basseteer

Cass. said...

Colonel - you are spot on when you say 'It is entirely and utterly, diversionary, disingenuous, lazy and un-researched to say this is not Islam simply because it?s a big, bad, ugly and frightening negative. This absolutely is the truth of Islam.'

Yes, this is the truth of Islam. No amount of PC idiots trying to convince us after each horrendous terrorist attack that peaceful Islam has been hijacked by radicals will alter this simple truth.

The core of Islam is JIHAD - killing infidels i.e. US! Why don't the apologists read the Qu'ran before trying ton convince us as to its peaceful message?

As Waleed Shoebatt remarked "what part of kill don't the West understand?"

'I?m growing tired of making the ?Slim and Shady? differentiation between Islam and Islamism.' I tend to agree with that. As Wafa Sultan made clear, there is only one Islam.

Personally, I would love there to be a 'nice' Islam which could replace the 'nasty' Islam which is all around it, but I haven't yet discovered it. If anyone does, could they please let me know.

Islam is totally evil. Many Muslims are subjugated by it, especially women and blacks, as Islam is the most racist and sexist ideology there is - even worse than Nazism.

Circe. said...

Colonel, this is a great article which tells it as it is! Muslims are here to destroy our society, make no mistake, and they are happy to say so...

From Oriana Fallaci – the Force of Reason.

In 1974, former Algerian President Houari Boumedienne said in a speech at the U.N.: "One day millions of men will leave the southern hemisphere to go to the northern hemisphere. And they will not go there as friends. Because they will go there to conquer it. And they will conquer it with their sons. The wombs of our women will give us victory".

In other words, says Fallaci, what Islamic armies have not been able to do with force in more than 1,000 years can be achieved in less than a century through high birth rates.

She cites as evidence a 1975 meeting of Islamic countries in Lahore, in which they announced their project to transform the flow of Muslim immigrants in Europe in "demographic preponderance."

So the first thing to do is name the enemy...Islam as it is! And stop Islamic immigration.

"What to say to a man who tells you he prefers to obey God than to obey men, and who is consequently sure of entering the gates of Heaven by slitting your throat?"


What to say indeed...well certainly not appease them as many 'academics, politicians, religious leaders, reporters' etc do!

This war can be fought and won only in one way. We have to uproot the tree of Islam. Period!

To paraphrase Taslima Nasrin (ex-Muslim) “Islamic terrorism is a poisonous branch that stems from the trunk of Islam. Until you uproot the whole tree, that poisonous branch will keep shooting up."

So we do our bit to write and speak against Islam. Education that tells the truth about Islam can uproot the tree!

I no longer ignore statements like 'all religions are the same, 3Abrahamic religions, Islam is peaceful, moderate Muslims, etc...' No!!!

All religions aren't the same, Islam is NOT Abrahamic but it is EVIL and as all Muslims follow this text, all are potentially dangerous! Many of our academics, religious leaders, politicians and so on are useless and even dangerous as they help Islam destroy from within..

'defending the indefensible, of tolerating the intolerant, of pretending the inhuman is human'

so those who see the danger need to take every opportunity to expose it...for our children and our grandchildren!

I am staggered by the change when I say to people that'I think Islam is evil'.

They suddenly relax and say 'yeah, me too' and we start talking about the problem of Islam because once you break the PC wall of silence and actually mention the elephant in the room, people want to talk about it, but are too frightened to openly express their views!

Keep tugging those roots!

Blue Heeler. said...

Excellent article!

As you say, student radicals have no moral conviction. They are so brainswashed by propaganda on campus that they are unable to think for themselves.

It's ironic that today's students feel virtuous marching under a banner "We are all Hezbollah Now", ignoring the fact that this means supporting religious apartheid, slavery, oppression of women and genocide, to mention but a few of Islam's principles.

Calling Israel a racist, apartheid state is contrary to objective facts. NOT calling the Arab countries racist apartheid states is also contrary to objective facts.

Sadly, the media, doubtless fuelled by endless Arab and Islamic money, have been peddling this nonsensical propaganda for so long that whole generations have been brought up to accept it as reality.

In my days as a student, we marched against apartheid! Now it is chic to march in support of racial and religious apartheid. And if you want to be seen as uber-cool, don't forget to don a Palestinian kerchief!

Blue Heeler. said...

Colonel - completely concur with the above.

"I seek no refuge in the nauseating and common currency of moral relativism, chums. Don?t need it. I look into Islam and see an Abyss, nothing more.

The factory output of ?if?s, but?s, because and maybe's?, are all wholly unconvincing. I find Islam unconvincingly Holy or is it convincingly unholy?"

I've been at this place for some time now. Islam has nothing to teach us. We have nothing to learn from it.

Islam neatly encapsulates all that is base and primitive in man, and seeks to clothe it in some legitimacy through the use of high-sounding but utterly hollow sentiment.

No sane, thinking person would ever use the word "logic" to describe Islams tortured meanderings across the mental landscape.

Islam can only survive under it's false self-presentation of being "a religion" because:
* people are too lazy to seek their own spiritual answers
* Islam has an iron fist.

While it remains an urgent task for us, informing as many Australians as possible of the true nature and intent of islam, there is also a complete futility in exploring Islam for worth, and this must also be hammered home, in my opinion.

I find the very fact that so many "leaders", both spiritual and secular, fall for Islams best gambit - dealing with them as though they had some legitimacy - almost beyond credibility.

This can probably be laid at the feet of notions such as the much discussed "crisis of confidence" that the West has allowed itself to fall in to.

That does not excuse it, however.
Centuries of observing Islam - centuries - have left us with a legacy of almost complete repudiation of Islam. We stand on firm ground established when academic pursuit was not as tainted and compromised as it is today.

The age-old critiques of Islam remain valid. Why this quaking at the knees now?

I demand a refutation of these following positions, before I will offer Islam one iota of legitimacy

"How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy.
Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist

A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property - either as a child, a wife, or a concubine - must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men".
(Winston Churchill / 1874-1865)

"Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities. Thousands become the brave and loyal soldiers of the Queen: all know how to die. But the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it.

No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytising faith.

It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science - the science against which it had vainly struggled - the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome."

"Muhammad legislates for all and makes exceptions for himself."
(Mansour Fahmy / 1888-? / The Condition of the Woman in Islam /1913)

Churchills summation of the reality and effect of the "religion" is as succinct and relevant today as it was 130 years ago.

His prognosis concerning Islams worldly intentions is being played out before our very eyes.

Today, churchmen are willing to engage in dialogue predicated by notions of Islam similar "roots" and deity.

No such doubts have existed in men's minds for centuries. Only now, at the height of Islams incursions, do we hear this tosh.
There is a better way to communicate with the Muslim - from without the camp.

They do not pass.

Slamm. said...

OK, that's it! Enough, already.

How much compromise will satisfy you lot? We've already kicked that inconvenient Jesus bloke out of church. We've allowed gays, feminazis, enviro-whackos and, really, the entire gammut of the late 20th century freak show to come on board. And jolly nice company they are, too.

What more can we do? What more can you ask? Please, you are giving us the vapors!

Never bother us with awkward problems such as our new "sheep" theologeons, any principals, positions or strict adherences.... so why should you?

They leave us alone with our "causes". We like our inoffensive "causes". We don't have to actually do anything.

Now you want us to call a spade a spade! What on earth gave you the idea we were in that business?

We have no problem with Islam. If it allows us to maintain our prefered state of irrelevance, who are we to stand up to them?
After all, they are telling us we are all descendents of Abraham.

We've forgotten so much of our foundational truths, for all we know..... they might be right!

Dan Z. said...

I'd say feeding body parts to the swine would benefit the swine in two diffrent ways.

Nutrition is one and I am sure it would also give them a new lease on life, as I do not see many volunteers ready to consume the flesh of all those hogs appointed as terrorist-munchers. :)