You wake up this mornin’ baby and Lord you find yourself dead.

"The future is here. It's just not widely distributed yet". William Gibson.


In 1968, the great Jimi Hendrix played at Madison Square Gardens. Or Jimi attempted to play, because a clarity free hippie dropped some "very bad LSD" into the drink of the exceptional and very young guitarist. Very "bad acid" is somehow very different to the kind of "very good" acid that is the first step on the disciplined and focused path to a successful concert.

“Hey, drugs got me where I am today! Nowhere!” Some hippie bastard.

Jimi struggled through the start of a set, halted and allegedly said “I’ve been dead a long time”. Dramatic or apocryphal, it was in the end maybe just the drugs or the decor. Hendrix was a very hard working, talented person and a generally nice guy, plus that rare thing in a modern celebrity, a patriot. Hendrix being a Screaming Eagle of the 101st Airborne an’ all. Ok, he dug it due in large part for the thrilling experience of parachuting and it also seemed like a good opportunity to his alternatives at the time. And yep, Jimi took er, drugs! To put it mildly. Though he was more of a red wine man and an avid room tidier.

Jimi sometimes startled his peers when he spoke patriotically about his own country and how Communism, especially in South East Asia er, sucked, which it did and still does of course. He also disturbed those unfamiliar with such things, when he spoke of the many bigotry's he had long suffered and not just from white folks, but from almost everyone.

People often misunderstand the deeply profound art of Jimi's expression, thats both raw, subtle, tender and furious while drawing their own fashionable, often one dimensional conclusions. For Jimi, a love of his country was a natural like he was, while sometimes terribly problematic, nuanced and even stark, but never stupidly hateful. Thus his art is lasting...the only thing Hendrix really lacked was enough time.

"I'll always touch you...can't you hear me, calling you?" Jimi.

And we've been dead a long time to how deluded and bankrupt general perceptions, or the lack thereof, have become.

Hendrix, like any subject I’ve ever got seriously interested in, could not be discerned accurately from the MSM at all. You could always feel the fingerprints of the last journo who went to the file drawer, and the one before, and before that, all repeating the same photocopied lack of insight and received lameness. For me, real insight came entirely from literature often sourced via the Net or the Net itself.

“I should have quit you, a long time ago. Now you got me crying, crying on the killing floor”.

And that's almost entirely my feelings regards the MSM, or the um, main stream media, Hollywood, celebrities and most of those with a repeated public voice. I feel a similar repulsion with our degraded, convoluted, and often compromised education system. Like an idiot hippie, they can have surprisingly similar views often completely unmoored from reality.

The common line that's pushed now, is that the Western Canon is mostly bad and pretty much entirely responsible for all the ills of the world, when the contrary is the empirical truth. The answer to the ills of the world is the spreading of the Western Canon, nothing else. There would be no modern 'world' without Western traditions.

"You can take all the sincerity in Hollywood, place it in the navel of a firefly and still have room enough for three caraway seeds and a producer's heart". Fred Allen.

"Of all the preposterous assumptions of humanity over humanity, nothing exceeds most of the criticisms made on the habits of the poor by the well housed, well warmed and well fed". Herman Melville.

The MSM is a mostly laughable and casual diversion, filled for the most part with hacks, shallow frauds and mediocrities, with little to zero insight, analysis, fact, depth or meaning beyond their own profoundly stupid and censorious bias. Of course, I’m not talking about the highly qualified modern journalist, who has studied hard over several years to become a professional. They’re much worse.

Much media is directed and twisted as a matter of fact and practice to fit the er, dominant paradigm. We've arrived at some kind of Kingdom of Logical Fallacy as a non-thinking norm. Where is media generally good? Maybe it's where real journalistic standards are indeed about life and death? To find a real journalist, pick your choice of any third world dump.

"The sad truth is that excellence makes people nervous". Shana Alexander.

Yep, it's a miserable stinker, and such cruddiness is not just in the general news and opinion pages, but in other sections of various tedious publications. When I was a kid, I thought publishing was done in a pub and I was right. The financial pages often have some of the most bizarre and clichéd ‘guidance’ that’s just simply not true. It might seem like something to a dullard with a comfortable and bogus MBA, but many of the ideas are often bunk. But what do they care? Not a whit.

Fatuous and hackneyed advice to the plebes on Managed Funds and such as the way to security. Er, no, only for the Managers of Managed Funds, sport.

Gee, no talk of the reality of the wealth of the truly wealthy coming from real estate, business, the development of ideas and services, capital movement, entities, trusts and buying through these etc? Or the fact that the discipline of buying consumer goods only really through real asset cash flow is what the rich do, not consumer goods and services via highly taxed wages, divided by time?

You can read mountains of this without stumbling upon any mention of the fundamental nature or existence of capitalist free market and the democratic freedoms that support it all. It's almost as if the Western Canon is its own ghost. A Che T-shirt wearing juvenile freak could read this stuff and see the economic world as entirely separate to any essential, useful or worthwhile reality, and of course, they do entirely.

This demonstrates that on almost every subject, the passive received MSM is wrong headed, dumb, limited, dishonest, mediocre, repetitive and pretty much useless beyond raw material for laughs, fustration and rage, and not always then. The MSM are happy to peddle the same reasonable sounding flop and bilge year after year. Study the reality of money, markets, business and so on and then look afresh at the usual ‘Financial Lift Out’ rubbish. Repeat the exercise on almost any subject. They hardly get a damn thing right.

Expect nothing from the media and you'll never be disappointed.

Why? Because they’re the MSM! They’re selling products to you, not real understanding or jeepers, news. In stentorian tones “Cutting news! All the news! News out your ass!” Like a magic act, you don't notice what ain’t there and what’s truly behind the empty illusion. A guy with a mop!

The medium is the message and the message contains no meaning, because they're not really in the business of informing you. While often entirely deliberate in their omissions, the MSM often don’t really know much themselves.

For these reasons, the reality of Islamism, resurgent Leftism, Communism and variant radicalisms, may just be into their third or final act without being reported, if reported at all, but as a contradictory lie. PC Leftist bunk after decades of concerted indoctrination has infected our body politic, public discourse, our institutions and even our own way of thinking.

It's so bad and poopy now, that the same kind of shrill freaks continually look for sources of complaint to give legitimacy for their er, obsessions. Thus absurd screams of “Racist!” and “Fascist!” with zero evidence or reason.

Folks often parrot to me that there's “lot’s of racists” um, "around". Well, in that case you’ll be able to supply at least one or two names then? Oh, I get it. Oh, you mean white people who are not PC Left? Check. There are no asian, black or Hawaiian racists. Check.

“All Left and Liberal ideas are discredited if you simply wait long enough”. Somebody cool.

The ordinary citizen will be under assault way before they read or hear about it, as they are in many ways already. There are many freaks that grow naturally, out of the logical decline created by PC Left Liberalism.

Britain and France etc, are already lost in the wondeful world of Islamisation, but we don’t see it reflected much, if at all in the Oz MSM, not even when we're dying in the streets and our homes. We'll wake up one morning and find our traditions, society, institutions, beliefs, decency and every one of the millions of things that make up life in a the free world, dead, dying and fighting for our lives.

You’ll be buying some cheese at a supermarket and the check-out girl will look flustered or crying, and there’ll be a feeling of bee like activity in the background and you’ll ask “What’s wrong?” And she’ll say “Haven’t you heard? A nuclear bomb exploded in Atlanta.” Or Melbourne, or Naples, or Dublin or...

Maybe it’ll be something else beyond our imagination that we turn away from thinking about now. There may be a point where people will ask why we weren’t er, "informed".

They’ll be cutting your head off, along with Mrs Noodlemier and your Aunt Doris, while the MSM are still blaming us while relentlessly trying to present a “balanced” story. You know, both sides of Auschwitz.

Those that disingenuously seek the intellectually lazy and morally bankrupt nonsense of “peace” with our determined and mortal foes, need to realise that such bunk will guarantee a harsh response. Whoever is hit, will launch missiles at ALL the likely suspects, and not wait for the next blast. That’s the way it’ll be, sports.

Remember, for the Left, the road we’re on is entirely the right and only road, except that the left can never be satisfied. The true goal of the Left is to accelerate, completely eradicate and then cement over any opposition to their irrational poison by stealth and legislation, and as soon as possible. Yep, try disagreeing with any of it and see how far you get.

"Of all tyrannies, a tyranny exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It may be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron’s cruelty may sometimes sleep, his cupidity may at some point be satiated; but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end, for they do so with the approval of their own conscience.” C.S. Lewis.

In Melbourne, there have been dozens of attacks as per usual, and every day for years by groups of North African males. Recently, a few unpleasant incidents even got reported. Whiz-zo!

They included attempted car jackings in peak hour inner-city Melbourne! Just like South Africa, Nigeria, the Sudan and any other vortex of tribalism and religion, kids. But not once is there a mention about the true reasons. Often alien cultures, religions, standards of normality, life and death experiences including war, warlordism, misogyny and well, expectations and attitudes. Damn hard thing to chang, the old attitudes, especially over the duration of a plane flight.

Nope, it’s invariably our fault somehow, or the Police, for either acting or not acting or um... In some cases yes, but er, mostly no.

Like, that fault would be all our faults then eh? Including every other immigrant group too? So the Welsh, Chinese, Norwegian and Scots are all to equally blame for social disruption? Nope. But er, personal responsibility, culture or religion is not? Guess not, eh? Or then we’d know why everyone doesn’t commit the same offences at the same levels.

My wife is Japanese and so far no Japanese gangs, not even a single band of marauding Sushi Chefs has troubled Melbourne.

That’s the ridiculous flaw in the Left activist chant of “You are on Aboriginal Land!” Er, right. So ya gonna go down to Little Saigon and say that? Get the Hell away from me! Er, isn't the land supposed to be like er, everyones Mother? Then hi, Ma!

As Mark Steyn has said, in France, it’s always the same story about rioting “youths”, meaning the global MSM can run this story a hundred times without mentioning the word Muslims once. Most no one I spoke to really knew exactly what and who they were voting for in Kevin Rudd, but they were very determined that they would, and why not?

For all John Howard’s faults and he had 'em, he was a relentlessly polite, dedicated, highly competent civil servant, patriot and statesman. When somebody's sellin’, I want to know what I’m buyin’! And people expect damn too much from government. This ain't healthy, bub.

The Left Liberal see's Nirvana-like answer to everything as essentially ever bigger government. Aah, but they do plan to control the state and all its power to co-erce the rest of us, so naturally it’s one of the few times they plan ahead.

Imagine going to the dentist but you’re not sure if he’s a dentist. “I don’t know. I’m tired of the other guy. This new guy that just started hangin’ around, looks great, and anyway, he despises my old dentist, so that’s good enough for me!”

The West will end badly if we don’t focus on the harsh realities around us. The Bolsheviks were only around 3% of the population, not that long before they took over, and the Nazis were at about 5% near 1930. Then it was ever onward to an endless murder spree.

"The best way to predict the future is to invent it". Alan Kay.

How many people now hold views that were not long ago, extreme Left and radical non-ideas? Now they're totally acceptable as mainstream and are even regarded as er, sensible? Environmentalism seems benign and smiley, at least without looking under the surface and at its history.

Enviromentalism is actually anti-human at base, and many of its main advocates in positions of influence and power believe utterly in culling via a legal genocide the “virus” of humanity. The head freaks are driven entirely by the passions of moral vanity, ego and ideology. Islamists are driven by their joy in all things necrophiliac, just like Hitler, Mao, Stalin, Che the child killer Guevara and all such "beasts among men".

At my puny Uni, there was an activist festival made of the usual standard smorgasbord of stale and bankrupt non-ideas. Students seem able to assemble this crud at the drop of a pavlovian hat. There was a stand protesting, surprise, the evils of GM crops. The evil that can feed millions and greatly reduce irrigation and pesticides via resistance to disease, and similiar to the plants we have had for decades, nearly all hybrids. Yes, evil.

The neo-hippie table girl, seemed unaware that the freak movement died around 1966, when Robert Plant and others paraded through ‘The Haight’ with a coffin. On it was written the cheerful news that "The hippie is dead", because the movement had already been flooded by affluent drop outs, misfits, criminals, the mentally ill and entirely appropriated by business who sold it back to millions of boobs as the rubbish it was.

As someone once said, "Once you could buy hippie wigs at Woolworths, you knew that the 'revolution' was over". Oddly, "hippie" was doomed to carry on as a kind of irrelevant and eternal 'Day of the Zombie Hipsters' right up to now.

I said to my fellow ‘student’, “Isn't it logical if you are against something, that you are ipso the old facto, also for something?”

She replied “Er, whatever…Viva the Revolution! Down with Fascist Imperialism and BushHitler! Viva Che! Bigger parental trust funds!” or something like that. Actually she just had a dumb look on her spoiled and very slappable face.

Says I: "Do you know anything about GM Golden Rice? It's the only way to deliver Vitamin A to the millions of people who without this essential element, are left blind and disabled?"

She did say “Er, what are you talking about?” Um, she didn’t want to know anything of course as her posturing is nothing to do with any reality faced by real people. It's all about her feelings and vanity. All protesters seem to contain quite a few, if not all of 'The Seven Deadly Sins'.

Now how can a tertiary student not have picked up on much if any of the facts of a major subject that they claim to be so passionate about say via the MSM? Why hadn't any teacher or other student it seems, pointed out such profound ignorance? Because mostly those sources don’t exist.

"Hey, I said I had strong emotions about it... I never said I wanted to understand anything!"

Only a few days ago I saw the usual headline standby of lazily calling GM “Frankenstein Food”. Ho, hum. Plus there was a picture of Frankie Stein with a carrot head! Pitifully stupid. GM technology is a highly refined plant science, not a Gothic assembly of freakish flesh, dig?

"What is at risk is not the climate but freedom…I see the biggest threat to freedom, democracy, the market economy and prosperity now in ambitious environmentalism, not in communism. This ideology wants to replace the free and spontaneous evolution of mankind by a sort of central (now global) planning”. President Vaclav Klaus of the Czech Republic.

The difference between being a Conservative, is that you believe in proven evidence and consideration, while the Left Liberal is interested entirely with the future and intent and how one feels about it all. Conservatives also usually believe in God, while the Left of mind in some way, often believe they are Gods. It's the mentality and perspective of the narcissitic and egotistical control freak. Thus as Mark Steyn has noted, the chances of running into celebrities at any Democrats, Labour Party or Greens rally is pretty high. The converse is true of Conservatives.

From Mark Steyn: Barbara Streisand told TV Guide, "Al Gore called from Air Force One for advice. I couldn't take the call. I was in the middle of something." Riiight...

Maybe we better concentrate on the right things now, before we have nothing left to focus on, but how to simply survive through a long dark night for civilisation.

“All failure is a lack of concentration”. The great Bruce Lee.

Islam sucks.

Warning! Imam! Keep away from children, women, men and pets!



From the great Roger Kimball: ‘Hassan al-Banna, the founder of the Muslim Brotherhood. Their credo: “Allah is our objective. The Prophet is our leader. Qur’an is our law. Jihad is our way. Dying in the way of Allah is our highest hope”.

I have a screech owl that I’ve called Mohammad. I also have a baboon and a chimpanzee named Mohammad. I have a dozen lovable newts, a hamster, a gnu, three aardvarks, a poodle, two mice, a rattlesnake and a sloth all named Mohammad. I also have a centipede, a slug, a blow fish, a family of Sea Monkeys and a Petri dish of bacteria all named Mohammad. I can say "Hey Mohammad!" and they all appear at once, alighting in photogenic pose.

The borderline insane and those that have rabidly leapt over that border of the mind, say that Mohammad is all. All lies? All insane? All over? All rubbish? All washed up? Allman Brothers? All I want to do is boogie?

Gee, the fact is sports, there’s absolutely no need to try to er, 'understand’ Islam, or come to an ‘accommodation’ with Mohammad and the Krazy Koran etc. Nope, can’t be done. Not without signing your own death warrant! None of that irrational and suicidal PC floop. Islam or Islamism, has exacly NOTHING to offer the great Western Canon whatsoever, except for the abyss.

Come on, let’s be honest. With Islam, there’s always the clearly implied threat of violence, isn’t there? Yep, there are millions and millions of all kinds of wonderful, decent and regular Muslims. But do just observe how these and the many Muslim dissident's, feminist's, journalist's, intellectual's and activist's etc, etc in the Muslim world and the West, are largely ignored, insulted and virtually completely unsupported by the Western Left intelligentia. It's empirical, baby.

Name one Left figure who supports a single courageous Iraqi Muslim in their struggle for normality? I'd love to ask such illiberal Leftards what kind of Iraq, the people there should have. Their logic would mean either putting or allowing the Baathist Party back into power, or any dominant group of killers, as long as they er, just love to hate America.

So naturally, such Muslim's really ain't generally the one's in charge in most places I'm afraid, and in the way that counts, are they? Power in such peculiar states, coming largely out of the oil fed barrel of a gun and the pages of the Koran, so to speak.

And er, many earnest PC folks seem to forget that Islam entirely sucks for million's of Muslim's too, and to the point of death. Hey, maybe that sucks!

When in Riyadh and Iran etc, one must do as Islamists do, which is "Destroy Infidels!" One thing though, under any circumstances, don’t ever "misunderstand" Islam. Your head may come off and you can just explode.

So this is what we should all do. Some of the ways I’ve found to utilise Mohammad, the all purpose 7th Century paedophile, rapist, madman, mass murdering lice ridden Jew hating bandit, is simply in conversation, to replace random or key words with Mohammad and so on. Everyone knows what you mean, as when one says "Frankly, Islam scares the Hell out of me".

And yet, we can still get some of the few laughs available out of the old bastard freak and the rest of the axis of medieval regards the krazy Koran, and as Christopher Hitchens perhaps correctly called it, "the filth of Islam". I’ve also thrown in some swingin’ bumper stickers. Try these. Remember, if Islamism goes global with the help of PC Left liberal socialism, we're all dead anyway or will wish we were. Especially the female half of the population. Still, gawd, it's a larf, innit, eh?


Islam. The Religion of Peace...or else!

Hey! Did somebody just Mohammad?

Frankly my dear, I don’t give a Koran.

Oh John! Oh Mohammad!

Oh God! I think I’m going to Mohammad!

Removes most bathroom Mohammad’s with a single wipe!

Removes even the most stubborn Mohammad’s in the wash!

I think we may have to put Mother into a home. She’s becoming more Mohammad everyday.

I’m afraid your tests are positive Mr Kowalski. You have Mohammad.

Sir! I said drop the Koran and move away from the nuclear device, now!

Your towel, sir.

In all my years of medical and psychiatric practice, I’ve never seen a Mohammad like it.

Islam? No, it’s beef!

Islam treats women like a precious gift. That’s why they wrap them up.

Larry, Mohammad and Curly.

Hey Mo! Nyuk, nyuk, nyuk!

And then he says, ‘you should have seen the other Mohammad!’

Hey Mohammad! Here boy!

All units respond to a Mohammad at 12th and Vine. Suspect is armed, has a history of psychological illness and is considered extremely dangerous.

In zis experiment I vill transfer zer brain of zis Mohammad into zer brain of zis chicken!

Of course I love you but we’re so different. You’re just way too Mohammad!

It looks like Mohammad is going for the triple play.

Hey Dude, like that Mohammad is like totally radical!

Early behead and early to lies, makes Mohammad unhinged wacky and despised.

Hey Kor-an, you’re the girl for me.

My, my, my, my, my, my, my, my Mohammad!

My Mother caught me having a Mohammad.

Hey, that’s like, totally Islam!

Adventurous cross dresser wishes to meet midget acrobat for casual fun times. Must be into Mohammad.

Oh, Mr President! I'll never get your Dhimmi stains out of my new dress!

Hey buddy. Interested in half an hour with a really hot little Mohammad?

I woke up this mornin’ and got myself Mohammad!

Are you some kind of Mohammad?

They Came From Outer The Koran!

I Was A Teenage Mohammad!

I never had sexual relations with that Mohammad.

I am not a Mohammad!

Dhimmi, Dhimmi coco pop!

The Australian Labour Party stands for all Mohammad's.

Read my lips. No more Mohammad's.

That curry gave me terrible Sharia.

Islam ah bad?

Life is but a dream...kaboom, kaboom!

Congress has just outlawed Islam. We commence bombing of Mecca in five minutes.

Whoh oh Black Betty, Ramadan. Damn things gone wild. Ramadan.

I just met a girl called Sharia.

Bewitched, bothered and beheaded am I.

In the merry, merry month of Ramadan.

A full Burqa looks like Gort the robot in drag.

Islamic puzzle book. Join the heads!

It looks like Mohammad is going for the red in the side pocket.

Now Mohammad, I just want you to relax and close your eyes and tell me, why do you hate everyone’s Mother?

That’s Mohammad ahead by two points.

Crazier than an Imam.

After washing thoroughly, please place all Mohammad’s in the bin provided.

I’ll have the Mohammad and eggs and a coffee, thanks.

I’ve been seeing another Mohammad, and we’re in love!

How could you spend all our savings on a Mohammad!

Hey man, this is Grade A Mohammad!

I’m sorry. We just sold our last Mohammad. We’re expecting more by Thursday at the latest.

They tried to tell us we were Mohammad.

Here’s looking at you, Mohammad.

Ramadan a ding dong.

Iraq me baby, all night long.

Hey, I’m gonna Mecca summa spaghetti!

Try ‘New’ Mohammad! Now with five times more Jihad!

Is your hair dry, lifeless and hard to Mohammad?

There is nothing to fear but Islam itself.

This is a day that will live in Islam, see.

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for Dhimmitude.

The truth about Islam? You can’t handle the truth!

Israel is real. Islam is unreal.

Islam gave me cancer!

'Harem Jane' Fonda. 'Haram Jane' Fonda. 'Annoy Jane' Fonda!

Islamism. It’s the crème de’ la crude.

The Omega Man is taken down by the Meagre Man and 'The Family'.

That final polling was a killer for the Government of John Howard.


Chuck Heston in ‘The Omega Man’: “What day is it, anyway? Monday? Huh? The Hell it is. It's Sunday! Sunday I always dress for dinner”.

Dear Sports, it’s not the end of the world, that's next week. I really don’t favour hyperbole unless it's funny, which it usually is, but when the jokes on me... Especially if it’s on record twelve months later, as an embarrassing reminder of how judgement and perspective are so clouded by emotion, and ain't they just? Look at the Left; that’s all they have really. But yeah, what a drag the way the election's panned out, a real drag. And yet, it seems that even the excitement of the victors seems er, somewhat slightly strained. Do they really believe it all? Maybe they do.

So apparently the next stop is their very collective idea of Utopia, on the Rudd PC Labour and Leftoid Express.

And now the challenges and tasks are ahead to er, do what exactly? The economy is a marvel, Australia is secure as far as naive Western Democracy’s go and what happens next? Er, fighting the non-existent threat of Climate Change? Or is it pressing home the endless list of PC Left, Liberal and Radical fashions for controlling you and I and everything, ad nauseum? Well, the most substantial stuff the Labour Party has is their Howard and Costello Policy Franchise.

Maybe forcing business to hire people at a set price and conditions? Yeah, that’ll work. Business doesn't have to hire, they hire because of a demand. “Sorry, not hiring due to Militant Union Logical Fantasy”. Quite frankly, what are often pushed by the Left and Labour as big ticket "issues", are either phony or blown out of proportion adjustments and changes.

While few want the extremes of the working poor, the flattening of perceived inequality is er, problematic to say the bleeding least. Yep, there are exploitative swine and I've worked for quite a few of them, but an enforced and entirely unnatural levelling has the opposite result to the desired effect. It can only create stagnation, limiting opportunity for growth especially in employment and business etc, and to put it mildly; the only real things that in the end are going to allow the ambitious and determined to get anywhere. Aah, freedom ain't as easy and comfortable as dependence, eh? And I should know, being a sometime musician and therefore a bum!

Apt and interesting that a Labour Unionist Minister was shown throwing 'Work Choices' in the bin. Hey, was that the dustbin of history where Socialistic ideas of economics end up?

A strangulated economy will indeed present fewer choices beyond the static and diminishing. Equality is relative and an absurd non-idea in a dynamic Capitalist Democracy of free markets and trade. The top, middle and lower levels have all risen incredibly by almost any measure.

True movement is only created by the natural dynamics of 'supply and demand' within markets. Dig how this creates the environment for the incentive to innovation required to competently ride such an effective and efficient beast...and hey, if you really want no rough edges, eat oatmeal. Baby on us all, a little rain must fall. All Socialist attempts to eradicate what is merely a part of real life, invariably ends with all but the control freaks at the top, standing in a diseased Leftist shit storm.

Compare the uninspiring and moribund economic fantasy's of Sweden, France and most of Western Europe, all doomed to collapse as their indulgent, Socialised, secular and unsustainable delusions die along with their 'Point of No Return' negative birth rates.

Then look at China, India, Taiwan, Ireland, the USA and Australia etc. A peculiar mix of er, almost mad market 'systems' to great Capitalist Democracy's, but all are dynamic for good and bad, while filled with real opportunity which attracts instead of repels investment. Gee, not perfect to put it mildly, eh? Very little is to a Left Socialist...except Cuba! At least China has mass executions, so that should count for something. Aah, all attempts at 'perfecting' free markets and society end in fiasco, utter failure, death and destruction. Sure, there's a bad side too.

The sometimes true motive of such non-thinking is of a non-idea driven by a moral vanity that cannot bear any reflections of the 'system that they actually despise', which is Capitalist Democracy. This makes it entirely less likely that there are opportunity's for any independence for the people you say you want to help. That is, creating something and not merely taking. But hey, that's a' Socialism amore! Gee, they can so quickly forget that they're the self-appointed heroes of 'the people!'

Freedom is economic freedom.

At the risk of sounding corny and hyperbolic after all, do they know what they may have done? Well, folks, they replaced a super successful PM and his government, including a highly competent Treasurer and a very qualified, wide ranging team with that of a mass of deliberately unrevealed Unionist's, ALP staff, Left lawyer's and activist types, and all headed by Kevin Rudd, a not so ex-Diplomat populist windsock, doing Tin Tin impressions.

As they say, barely a 'civilian' on the whole front bench and almost no real world business people if any, folks. Rudd has been a Diplomat and a 'Consultant'. Hmmmm...

‘The Age’ screamed out "Howard humiliated”. Er, maybe not as much as the mediocre and entirely dull Leftoid broadsheets like ‘The Age’ would like. The bias shown by that strange, now almost zero journalistic standards bore sheet, and most of the Oz MSM has been er, instructive. I get it.

Yes, it was interesting how Rudd entered into the appalling claim on a tedious TV show that he would "beat John Howard in a bar fight!". Riight, that's really a nice way to think in Democratic politics, and er, nobody seemed troubled by this bit of Mark Lathanism. Rudd is a kind of Mark Latham MK2. While Latham was the out of control freak and Rudd is the control freak that's now in. It's as if Kev would say anything if it blows with the current winds of opportunity.

There's almost no honest interest in informing people about anything much beyond the narrow and bankrupt fantasy opinions of journalists and editorial boards. Bravo! Now I know what the government and commercial media think. The same things. Thanks for ‘informing’ me.

Folks, if you rely on the MSM of print and TV for information, you have learnt little to nothing about any subject. What you have ‘learnt’ is a load of MSM product, which is entirely different to reality. Unless you go online for insight and analysis, and to also track down decent literature, you may as well get the laughable news and current affairs via an injection.

Apparently John Howard was the evil one, a cipher to hang every absurd and mostly baseless grudge on. Well, he’s gone now, so who ya gonna bawl? The whole premise “Howard out!" is that it’ll be so much better now. How, no-one can say with any empirical substance exactly. So let the self-loathing and the despisers of the Western Canon knock themselves out.


Matthias: “One creature, caught. Caught in a place he cannot stir from in the dark, alone, outnumbered hundreds to one, nothing to live for but his memories, nothing to live with but his gadgets, his cars, his guns, gimmicks... and yet the whole family can't bring him down from that, that...”

Zachary: “Honky paradise, brother?”

Matthias: "Forget the old ways, brother, all the old hatreds. All your pains".


Aah, that’s right, the classic phony front of wanting the logical impossibility of “equality”, the basis of all Totalitarianism. All Leftist guff when taken to its logical end can only ever go one way.

Now I doubt entirely that Kevin 'Mathias' Rudd is going to be saying “we will bury you” as he glares at the Opposition in a badly tailored suit. In fact it may be the turpitude of his own party’s many fractious and extremist factions and the allied 'Freak Parades' of the Greens, the Teachers Union, environmental groups and so on, that will perhaps attempt to do entirely that.

And what either the Liberals or Labour or anyone planned to do about more seriously facing, identifying and explaining global Islam both foreign and domestic beyond the sometimes stumble as we go, well, I don’t know. When the future finally comes to us not just internationally but domestically and with full force, I wonder how well the required back flips will go? I wonder, wonder I do…

Back to Kevin, who while a control freak, is still it seems, a Democratically moored man who believes in the process and laws of his position. But he seems a weak, lacking and profoundly hollow leader to me and not just personally, but because within the fatally flawed structure of a Labour Party that never seems to truly change at core for the better, he has it seems, no real power base. It seemed from a distance as if Rudd was slowly moved to centre stage over the last handful of years, as if on wheels.

Who knows, he may rise to the occasion along with his Cabinet and the Labour Party will finally jettison the Leftist monkey on its back...er, probably nope on that. Rudd is a religious man, a hopeful sign maybe, as religion is generally to the Left like garlic is to movie vampires. Er, sadly, Franco was a religious man too, but taller. The Left do like to hate, manipulate, lie, destroy and burn though, don't they?

Chuck: At it again, I see? What will it be tonight? Museum of Science? Some library? Poor miserable bastards.

'The Family': "Burn! Burn it all!"


Sometimes when I observe the beliefs, as opposed to the actual practices of many of the affluent elitists who make up various positions of power, influence and public voice, and now have an election victory to enact them, I often see bunkum. This could quite easily be shown in argument but is shown in the disparity between what they say and entirely how they live.

Want to avoid running into a Politician and or activist who believes in open immigration? Live in a crappy, crime ridden and dysfunctional working class area filled with immigrant frictions.

Want to run into the peoples heroes? Don’t hang out with the people! Go to exclusive get togethers worth hundreds to thousands of dollars per head. Now there’s nothing wrong with being loaded, I’d love to be. It’s the phony linking of the rebel cred that turns my gut.

Don’t get me wrong. Australia is no corrupt dump and we’re actually very well served by our pretty decent politicians of most persuasions, who work hard and achieve much of what we take for granted. It’s just um, many are God awful. So if you want improvement, don't vote for me!

Now, John Howard had his flaws and was absent in several areas and blew the election. But both parties always fund a vast array of wasteful, indulgent programs from multicultural mutations to endlessly mediocre alleged arts bilge. Quite a bit of it just radical to deviant propaganda, that without the prop of tax dollars, would instantly sink without trace. Hey, I don't mind the deviance, it's just that deviants should pay their own way, not via the public purse. I always buy my own ticket!

Government funded art is mostly not worth a damn. Beyond usually superficial and repellent decoration, you get tax funded Freak Parades telling you that their junk is where it's at baby, that it's somehow 'relevant' and they're an artist merely by default of saying so.

"Look! It says so on my card. I'm an artist!"

And apparently, it's always entirely the audiences fault if they don't find it all that er, swingin'.


It was all full of good intentions, but I deeply despised Howard's wrong headed and foolish fraud of taking away the right of law abiding citizens to own guns, leaving us all utterly limited, powerless, unarmed and thus ultimately defenceless against a changed or capricious state, civil collapse or criminal assault. All quite possible and the last, is an actual. If you think it’s a good thing to be unarmed citizens, you really want to study history, especially of enfeebled collapsing European, Asian, African, Latin American Democracy’s, Communist States, Nazism, Nationalism and Islam etc.

But John Howard and Alexander Downer are two of the very small group of international politicians who have any clarity on the reality of Islamism at all. The main difference between Howard and Rudd is that Howard did everything because it was he believed, the best for Australia. Rudd seems to act for whoever Kevin Rudd is.

Back to the future, sports. Most of the causes and complaints of the Left and general populace against the government are entirely peripheral, fashionable, unproven, absurd and superficial. They are, mostly unscientific. The solutions proposed for problems that are mostly non-existent or small are ridiculous, unworkable and also sans scientific.

The Greens Leader Bob Brown opposes dams while we run out of catchment water. He says water tanks instead! Er, as Andrew Bolt said, it would take 150 million tanks at a vastly increased cost to do the same job. Er, Bobby, ya have to make steel with nasty industrial things, see? What a shallow flake, but the voters don’t mind at all. As long as they “feel” good about things and especially themselves. hence the surfeit of emotion that greets young Kevin.

Brown has all the scientific, business and engineering acumen of a garden gnome. But that doesn’t matter because you can go far today, without the un-PC hindrance of rational thought. It’ll only hold ya back!


Bob ‘Matthias’ Brown: “Definition of a scientist, a man who understood nothing until there was nothing left to understand”.

Chuck: “So, there is a little light in the forest after all”.

Matthias: “Take him to the little room... for the questioning”.


There was a revealing couple of moments in Kevin Rudd’s victory speech, made almost entirely it seemed, of polite and sunny cliches. “Turning a fresh page” and “for all Australians” etc. I must have missed “light at the end of the tunnel”, “the challenges ahead” and “love cuts like a knife”. What struck me was that it all meant nothing, but the people seemed to like it, a lot.

As he gave praise to America, without mentioning George Bush I think, he deliberately gave no space for the expected boos and segued straight into the next thing. While he spoke, an earnest baloney fanatic shouted angrily “When are ya gonna ratify Kyoto?” I wanted Kevin to say “When I get the wallpaper and have a spare weekend”. I felt for Kevin for a moment and thought what a rude jerk this guy was and how it said so much.

Funny, eh? As Kevin Rudd usually bores and sickens me. Aah, 'The Kyoto Thing'...the last time I saw a more absurd, pointless, empty document that could only lead to disaster, Prime Minister Chamberlain was waving it about.

Yeah, today the Leftoid allegedly loves and supports someone, but by lunch, if they’re no longer of any use, they drop them like a...? Hey, no Rudd speech excerpts here, sport! And what does such an interjection from alleged 'supporters' say of the ingratitude, the endless sense of entitlement and the eternal child mindset of the Left? Because, that’s what they actually are.

I wonder how long our Kevin can hide out in the camouflage of the amorphous and indistinct. All these odd folks and the junior army of “Kevin07” school system indoctrinated teenage moon bats, urgently and earnestly all want and expect Kevin to now put into practice, and actually do, all their slogans and placards. Er, in real life! But not as we’ve known it, Jim. The Left and Labour always eat their own.

Chuck talking to a bust of Caesar with whom he plays an endless chess game: “Your move, Imperator”.








Mark Steyn on how most film makers, artists, musicians and writers etc, have nothing to say about Islam. Nothing either true, rebellious, negative or individually daring and not just because they’re scared and have nothing to say.

http://www.macleans.ca/culture/entertainment/article.jsp?content=20071122_57091_57091

Is this room going to the airport?

"Many people, and not just the super demented, are just plain crazy about their pet obsessions".



Dear sports, here's a request of the week from Friday 23 November 2007, all nicely modified.


Mrs Freakmeister: "Excuse me. Is this room going to the airport?"

Colonel Neville: “No, it’s going to Zimbabwe. You want the 5:PM steam shovel on Platform 9, Platform 9, Platform 9”.

Now sports, a demented, delusional and paranoid old lady asked me this fantastically Goon Show style question, meaning what time exactly, was her flight to the Outer Rings of Venus leaving? The disturbing thing is that many allegedly regular people, even outside of institutions, are nonetheless just as deluded, misinformed and plain mad as Mrs Freakmeister. That’s of the Venus Freakmeisters.

Mrs Freakmeister: “Oh, is this my room?”

Colonel Neville: “Er, yes. See all the photographs of YOU on the side table?”

Mrs Freakmeister: “Oh, no stranger would ever have my photographs in their room!”

Colonel Neville: “Mrs Freakmeister, if I don’t get away from you, your insanity will suck the life from me, much like a bleached coral sponge”.

And many people do. For a lot of folks, the existence or abscence of empirical evidence are the least likely things to ever alter their opinion's in the slightest. For many, either way to the contrary can merely prove they're right!

“When dealing with people, let us remember we are not dealing with creatures of logic. We are dealing with creatures of emotion, creatures bristling with prejudices and motivated by pride and vanity”. Dale Carnegie.

I once had a Chinese girlfriend who was a true morbid narcissist and completely mad. She was also the only genuine nymphomaniac I’ve experienced personally, and er, repeatedly. Though it ain't anywhere near as good as it sounds, sports. I mean the nympho part, not the er, morbid narcissist thing, which is exactly as bad as it sounds. She constantly burnt food because she’d just walk out the door, mid stir fry. So naturally the fire alarm would go off every second day and then she’d complain about the noise...

Chinese Monster: ”What dat for? Orrwayz peep, peep, peep!"

Colonel Neville: “Er, that’s to warn us of any fire in the apartment say at 3:AM, dig? [Under breath] You crazy bastard".

Chinese Freak: “But I never cook at 3:AM!”

And why not indeed. In the same senility corral as the room service to the insane woman, if not the same universe, was another bereft and raving old dustbag. Her endless screamings concerned crazy, amazingly paranoid, convoluted and absurdly impossible future events.

Mrs MacGillicuddy: "The government are boiling the very pies we eat! And the steam is rising! Mark my words. In the future, we'll all be permanently damp and waterlogged, and that's when they'll jump! We won't be able to run, you see. We're being watched now. Oh yes. My phone is monitored. Pick it up. Go on. I can hear them whispering. Everything is in place. Oh yes".

Much like the manic obsessions of conspiracy and environmentalism, eh? Which reminds me of Oz Greens Leader Bob Brown, a man whose mind is spread so thin when attempting to grasp any subject, that it can be folded many more times than the theoretical seven.

“I know what you’re up to! You’re with that woman up the street and you all stink! Don’t you think I don’t know?! I have proof! I have photos! Of you with the King, the King of Norway. You’ll never take me alive! You’ll never rule the world with your dirty tricks; ya death rays don’t scare me! Get away from me! Don’t you dare leave me! I’ll stab you, I will!"

Er, that's Mrs MacGillicuddy, not Bob Brown discussing Green's Policy. And yet, compared to the opinions of the MSM, all seemingly formed by mere chance, Mrs Mac could almost be as a breath of fresh air. Her scrambled mind stands out as clearly mad because well, everyone else is not like that. And there’s the rub, matey’s.

It’s hard to find contrast in the MSM between good and bad when apart from small fastly evaporating pools of intellectual light, the majority of the virtually useless MSM is so reflective of each other. And on so many critical subjects, merely reinforce rather blithely, captive delusions and ignorance.

"Whenever you hear the consensus of scientists agrees on something or other, reach for your wallet, because you're being had". Michael Crichton.

When so many agree with what is nothing but fashionable guff, hyperbole, predictive bunkum, passively received indoctrination and junk that we've just grown up with, you find that ever fewer can speak out and say um, that’s simply not true. To know what the real motives for pushing something are, and say here is the empirical evidence that will utterly Fisk this, point by crushing point, is er, time consuming and difficult.

And there you have it. The dominant MSM and educational angle is mostly of the Left. It’s more emotional, passionate and always seemingly urgent. It's really about control and vanity. Moral vanity.

Living in the inner-city as I do, the chances of meeting folks not sodden with Left cant is sometimes kinda pretty slim. Of course not everyone in the inner-city is affluent and nuts. Some folks are loaded and entirely irrational.

For instance, I went to an open day for my son’s primary school last year. On a class room wall there were pictures of Coalition troops, with a list of descriptive questions, followed by the alleged answers of the er, children.

I say alleged, because if you can swallow a child of about seven emoting in "SmashTheCapitalistWarMachineImperialistMurderersEtc" GreenLeft Weekly speak, all placard and chant ready, let me know how. The military are, according to our junior Sean Penn's and Noam Chomsky’s, mostly very bad "angry" people. Yep, the highly trained professional adults, of diverse backgrounds whose awesome courage and patriotism has given us everything we have, have been presented as creeps and borderline criminals, and not in reality straight from the mouths of babes, but via the ideological delusions of people a little taller than a seven year-old.

George Bush was surprise, an idiot, a liar and every seven year-olds common concept, a kind of Fascist. Er, no. The fully qualified and experienced jet pilot who graduated with a common C average from Harvard and Yale idiot.

Er, do seven year-olds usually think in terms of Fascism, meaning military states with all industry nationalised, total control of all speech via the state, and with some bizarre kind of agrarian fantasy overlay? Doubt it? Sounds like Left Liberalism. Come on, kids have to be shovel fed this junk with little chance of dissent. They don't usually turn into sour and self-loathing paranoids without assistance. It ain't natural.

Aah, teaching kids not how to think, but what to think, ends in ideologically driven mediocrity so pervasive and accepted, that no one, especially a seven year-old, can conceive of anything outside of it. And this is done by otherwise good people. Go figure. It’s the Invasion of the Body Snatchers as per usual. Don't let ya podfolks try this on ya at home, kids! Stay awake.

Now where's that rebellion gone?

It seems now, that if you agree with enough of someone, you agree with it all, and there’s no need to have any objective ability to discriminate with any proportion or perspective. Developing the thinking skills required for discriminating analysis is the basis of rational thought. The elimination of this is Leftism. The extreme and the amorphous. Some choice. Odd, innit?

To encourage children to not tell the difference between Hitler, Stalin and Mao on the one mass murdering hand, and Bush, Howard and Blair on the other, is bizarre. Or to see the incredibly successful West of Capitalist Democracy, free markets, freedom and the human rights that they do represent, as the true and only source of evil in the world, is not only insane and wrong, but deeply corrupting, manipulative and corrosive to young minds. This is cognitive dissonance and it doesn't bode well.

It certainly doesn’t bode well for the assistance I look for with my own flaws, faults and limitations. I like to meet the many people who are far better than I am, but who has that much time? It’s disturbing to me to imagine being left to my own feeble resources. I thank God everyday for the Internet and independent publishing.

"It crushes a man's ego. I feel...lonely". Chuck in Planet of the Apes.

"To predict the behaviour of ordinary people in advance, you only have to assume that they will always try to escape a disagreeable situation with the smallest possible expenditure of intelligence". Friedrich Nietzsche.

If only I’d grasped any of this or anything at fifteen, or thirty five. Well, um, Nietzsche was a proto Nazi, a people hating and self-loathing nutcase at the best of times, but nobody's perfect. And he was if anything, consistent.

So of course, all the George Bush photos also had little Adolf moustaches and matching quiff sets. No one seemed to find this er, culturally insensitive to say any Jews, who gee, do know the difference. Now don’t get me wrong, the teachers are good people otherwise, and competent. It’s just that er, something is wrong. Maybe it’s the space-time continuum?!

In the staff room was a sensitive Teachers Union take on Ramadan. You know, the traditional Muslim cleansing ritual prior to the traditional Muslim violent Jihad. If you can spin that positively, you can spin anything.

“OK. This is how I see the new advertising campaign, Stalin baby. Can I call you Joe? Smile and lose the moustache! The kids will love ya! Trust me! I did wonders for Che the child killer!”

"On everything from Indian policy to education, ideological purity now trumps even the most obvious failures in practice. The single greatest weakness of Western culture is the ability to draw a moral equivalence between anything and everything. It’s really an inability to see anything in due proportion".
Mark Steyn.

You can't think rationally when ya polarised, kids. The mind swings from one extreme to another like a pair of toy magnet poodles. So what do I end up with? Avoiding being bogged down in the automatic treacle of the misinformed. At many a workplace folks spend their lunch break staring into space, gossiping, watching the very loud TV no matter what’s on, never reading and consuming often B grade food. So much for management, you should see the staff!

Yet almost invariably many have strong views on geopoliticics, economics, security and clog dancing, of which they deliberately know nothing.

"Howard’s a racist! I like Rudd’s smile. We need a change! Bush has caused terrorism!, America is so bad. I don't like cheese snacks. Is the cricket on?"

“I don’t know anything about art, but I know what I like!"

Sadly, it’s not an inherent skill for any of us to be able to escape from the circle of logical fallacy. It takes some effort. Such nopinions are second hand impressions from second rate minds, and one ends up thrown upon the rough seas of emotions and of worthless viewpoints. But hey, Bon Voyage!

"Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are even incapable of forming such opinions". Albert Einstein.

Alleged ‘Security Expert’ says that the causes of insecurity are all alleged.

According to a laughable British 'Security Expert', this could have easily been avoided! If only we'd had a nice 'inclusive' talk with nineteen Islamist freaks at the 'Airport Coffee & Cake-O-Rama'. It's a great place to snack, chat and Jihad!

All our food is Halal, so please notice this little courtesy Mr Islamist freak, and try not to want to kill us all please? Is that ok? I hope I wasn't too assertive there? Look! I'm really abasing myself and being tolerant and understanding like crazy! I feel your rich Arab pain!

If only we hadn't done a million things over the last 2,000 years and instead done a million other things instead and neither and also both at once...if only. Note to self: 'The list of things that offend Muslims can be narrowed down to everything and nothing'.




According to er, ‘British Security Expert’ Chris ‘no abs’ Abbott, its actually global warming that’s slicing countless heads from bodies and blowing thousands of people into a million pieces. His kind of ridiculous, pitiful and shameful attitude via absurd circus like and non methods, are working out pretty well then, for everyone in the UK and the rest of the Eurabia Kingdom?

The following madness was sourced from an article by Cameron Stewart in ‘The Weekend Australian’ newspaper for November 17-18 2007. It's one of the less stupid broadsheets in Oz. Cameron may have well been reporting the non thinking skills as they are in some disturbing parallel universe. Abbott the simultaneous Dhimmi and Greenoid acolyte delusional, gave his “provocative thesis” at the Australian Federal Police Conference on National Security this week. Why does this give me no confidence?

Because sports, Chris Abbott is a stupid and incompetent fool who has no business speaking to anyone about security, the reality of Islam or really ah, anything much at all. Look, it's ok for Chris to discuss his new lawn mower with the post man, but not for too long. How can I be so opinionated? It ain’t easy! But with our hero, Chris ‘Yabba dabba don’t’ Abbott, it is easy! As we shall see…

Our half a Federal Police Commissioner, Mick Keelty, invited Christ Abbot because he er, agrees with Abbott! Well that’s settled it then. Jeepers, I’m so surprised. Mick makes me think of a guy that you go round to borrow a spanner set from, and he’s making a chicken coop while listening to the races. He says “Ya wanna use the right gauge shifter on that, mate”. A nice guy but maybe not the ideal AFP Commissioner to deal effectively with Islamism, especially not with that haircut.

Abbott is a ‘researcher!’ with the ‘think tank!’ the Oxford Research Group. Sure he is and sure they are. I think their group just tanked. More of a stink tank, really. And gee, another turn up for the books; Chris Kringle used to be “a campaigner and researcher on a range of social and environmental issues”. Wow, I knew you’d be surprised. Fancy that…a Leftish mediocrity, who has an urgent message of bunkum sans empirical evidence. How unusual.

His idea is that terrorism, in reality think mostly Islam sports, is not the greatest threat to security, whereas the utter fashionable fantasy of Climate Change is the real terror, and it's here already! Run! It’s the end…once again.

The other apparent "threats" are “competition for scarce resources, marginalised populations and the trend towards militarisation”. Er, yeah. A list of Leftoid activist canards basically, yet there's ample more parody from Chris, all worthy of a High School debate team.

In all of the previous, there is not a whit of how economics, innovation, change, population or effective security actually works. But then, there rarely ever is with a Leftish mind, such as it is. Because Leftoid folks have entirely no interest in such things. It's "feelings, nothing more than feelings, trying to forget love...etc"

Dear Abby advocates “talking with terrorists!” Hey, why not? But you first Chris, and remember to watch your neck! You may not like what you hear, if you ever damn well do listen, because the message of Islam has been loud and clear for a long time. Over thirteen hideous and repetitive centuries so far. Islamist demands are simple and pretty easy to grasp, but not for syrup headed Chrissy so it seems.

They are convert to Islam, Dhimmitude or death.

“Reducing use of fossil fuels”. So stop that China, you naughty people, who wrongly want to escape 5,000 years of crushing poverty and live more like er, Chris Abbott! “Quitting Iraq”. Yep, there’s nothing a mortal enemy like Islam respects more, than the cultural vacuum of PC cowardice and running away.

Um, Islamists are globally in-country, and in ever growing numbers, or you know they can apparently just catch a plane. Gee, wouldn’t such utter weakness and confused Dhimmi idiocy perfectly embolden such freaks? Oh, that’s right. They’re not such an important threat after all. The World Trades Centre collapsed due to rising damp!

As per usual Leftoid modus operandi, Abbott scatter guns for the “real” causes of terror. Anything but face the unbearable abyss of a reality that may just knock the whole shit pile of Leftist lies right over. You know, it's caused by poverty due to a lack of oil trillions I guess. We’ve apparently also been too “reactive!”

“Hey! That was some bomb blast. First thing, let’s not be reactive! Waiter, we’d like some more cheese cake, please”.


Abbott drones on predictably about “addressing legitimate political grievances and aspirations of marginal groups” He recommends and I kid you not, “dialogue with terrorist leaderships...!”

Jesus H. Christ!

Not only does the couching of harsh realities in such PC cliché thicker than sewer sludge, say so much about the mindless mindset of our Christine, but every single one is empirically irrational. Pure Logical Fantasy, sport.

Who doesn’t have ‘legitimate political grievances?’ Name me a country that doesn’t? It’s called life, bub. Why isn't everyone setting of IED's and cutting off heads etc? So Muslims are not the only people with a grudge, mostly self inflicted, but the only ones encouraged to air them with mass murder. Listen Chris, Islam has it’s own motives and goals that have been around for 1300 years despite however much we may be tolerant of their daily atrocities and ‘understand’ their ‘problems’.

Not only is there no "leadership" in terrorist cells, networks and movements per se, but there is no leadership in Islam. Not since Mad Mohammad achieved his one good act and croaked. Talk to who exactly? Gee, maybe sign some legal documents at the UN? Gotta work! And Abbott would trust such an absurd tea party of the Left, Liberal, Radical, Nationalist, Communist, Socialist, Extremist, Cannibal State, Gangster Heaven and Islamist 'minds'? Is he nuts?

The only way to improve the UN is to cut off the top ten floors.

Chris is I believe, unless he's kidding me, completely ignorant and lazy regards any real insight or analysis of Islam at all. What he says is not worth a damn unless you want to catch the fatuous express to security and cultural suicide. Hey, if Chris is joking, it's hilarious then!

What is a “marginal group exactly?” That’s physics unless you can make everyone and everything fit into some insane idea of all being in some impossible 'middle'. But the middle of what?

Life is made of gradient; it’s not an amorphous gloop. So, until the West only I suppose, can make life completely ‘fair’, we should accept the attacks of Islam? How come no other group acts this way and gets an army of instant apologists, just add PC Left ideology? How come Muslims are responsible for committing around 85% of global violence since about 1960?

Oh God, it gets so tedious folks, that I have to cut to the chase for stupidity and here it comes!

Abbott raves how the GW Apocalypse is just around the corner…exactly when though, he omits to say. But Keelty agrees and piffles on that it could create ‘climate refugees!’, “in their millions!” Er, how does "could" happen, trump is happening, so easily?

Er, baloney with ya big 'if's'. Um, I can show you thousands of photos of people who have actually been beheaded, tortured, mutilated and blown up already and now, Boffo Boy. Give me a name and show me a single photo of even one person who has without question, been seriously harmed or killed by the crud of Climate Change. Bet cha’ can’t, because it’s…wait for it, not true.

Chris explains, in a fashion, how if we don’t act within ten years, we won’t be able to avoid “the earth from becoming a highly unstable place by the middle years of this century”. Er, Chrysalis...the earth IS a highly unstable place, being a ball of molten lava and spinning around over a thousand miles an hour an' all etc, etc.

“Stop the Planet of the Abbott’s! I want to get off!”

The whole article decays into bone tired tedium as Cameron duly notes, Chris Abbott is covering the same barren and wacky territory as Bono the tax shelter specialist. You know, 'the successful economies and societies of Capitalist Democracy, free markets, with the rule of law, the free exchange of ideas and the freedom of the individual etc,should all give the fruits of their efforts to the corrupt regimes that are none of these things, etc, ad nauseum'.

Then of course, there’s disarmament, the irrational answer for when you’re under sustained attack by an enemy who wants to destroy you. There’s recycling, based not on practicality or value, but on the miserable Leftist views of a world of ‘scarcity’, simply because such people seem incapable of being industrious and creating anything, especially the valuable and rare currency of ideas.

Aah, the classic meaningless, fatuous, glib and empty platitudes of “make world poverty history”. Higher carbon based taxes to push up the share prices of several Al Gore companies. More ‘management’ meaning read as ever bigger government. Something called “sustainable security” and so on, to the end of a virtual Student Activist pamphlet.

I thought sustained security would mean that we sustain a belief in our own cultural traditions and values regards the greatness of the Western Canon, Judeo Christianity and therefore we are fertile and focused enough to see things clearly.

The harsh fact is that Islam is entirely the enemy. Especially the coming nuclear armed Jihadist one, and we should take their daily words, actions and history entirely seriously.

Conversely, we should not take intellectual midgets and buffoons like Chris Abbott and any of his clueless, profoundly unresearched and disingenuous fans seriously, not even for one fatal moment.




PS. Dear Chris, go to the web sites 'The religion of Peace', 'The Prophet of Doom' and 'Jihad Watch', all in my swingin' links down the right hand column. Read Robert Spencer on Islam facts and history, Walid Shoebat the ex-Muslim and terrorist, 'America Alone' by Mark Steyn, 'While Europe Slept' by Bruce Bawyer, 'Londonistan' by M. Phillips, 'Infidel' by Ayaan Hirsi Ali and so on, and so on, just for starters. Then take two aspirin and don't call me in the morning.

Colonel Neville.

It's a funny old world, innit?

Bill, the host with the most, explains the hiring of White House staff under Clinton.


The worlds foremost pair of clinical narcissists, the Clinton's, telephoned me last week, merely to deny that they had ever telephoned me. Bill asked about reversing the charges, or my wife completely dropping them. For a cool million or two...

What should one wear if Bill Clinton's coming? I'll get the wife to wear white! That’s why Bill got blow jobs in the White House. To hide the stains! By the way, Bill dropped in again yesterday and while I was busy, he took all the grapes from the table and must have hidden them in the small and crumpled bag he had with him, that wasn't Hillary.

I said, "Bill, have you seen the grapes that were here?" And I swear, he looked me straight in the eye and said, "There were no grapes on the table at any time!" Is there something wrong with Slick? Sheesh, a man can't even leave fruit unattended around a Clinton.

Al Gore also dropped by and I’ll never forget what he said.

“I enjoy collecting toffee wrappers during the week, so that if it is precipitous, I can spend Saturday afternoons spreading them out. Do you know that if you add the area of an entire lifetimes worth of wrappers that they could cover the New Hebrides? Of course, I could never consume such a vast amount of toffees. No, such a vastness would be out of my league. That's more for your professionals like Al Gore”.

Colonel Neville: “But you’re Al Gore”.

Gore: “If only I was Colonel, if only I was”.

Gore inspires me less than the feeling I'd get trapped in an eternal caravan park seaside holiday watching daytime telly in the rain, while listening to Scottish Favourites, the Mrs Mills Band and a BBC sound effects library record of a linoleum factory, while Ken Loach makes a 'real life' documentary of every moment of it over several decades, and my Mother never stops ironing, repeating endlessly “Who was that English singer again, you know, the one with the big lips? Was it Mark Jacker? Mike Jenkins? Marty Jammer?”

As luck would have it, Gore and Bill both came together, so to speak. Bill immediately grasped my arm with both hands, looked me straight in the eye as usual, and said, “You know, it's not sex that's over rated, it's not having sex that's over rated. Or having sex with people who think sex is over rated. Mind blowing sex is invariably under rated by those who don't rate at sex at all.

The more alive, energetic and complete a human being you are, the more you want to, and are able to share this with somebody who is hopefully the same. Lack of this or a boring and tragic mis-match is the basis of most if not all sexual frustration and otherwise.

By the way, do you have anymore of those delicious grapes?”

Colonel Neville: “Aah, hah! How do you know they were delicious, eh?”

Clinton: “Er, Albert told me. Hey, Albert! Did you finally finish that scale model of your Carbon Credits Company Headquarters? It looked exciting, man”.

Al Gore: “Well, thankyou Bill. In fact I haven’t yet. I need more power. But I should be ramped up enough to apply the decals next month …and do you know that the Australian bull ant can…”

I didn’t catch the rest as I gestured to Gore to stop with a wooden mallet and then I ran out the door and down the street screaming.

“You know” said Bill, as I returned with a makeshift ‘Cone of Silence' that he inhaled, “few people are serious about diarrhoea, but I am. I feel that the people of America deserve more. Al and I, and our many progressive friends in Hollywood where this movement all began, are going to get diarrhoea back on the screen where it belongs. ‘Diarrhoea! When do we want it? Never!’ What do ya think, Colonel?”

“Hey, the pizza’s here!”


"Hillary and I have got a great idea for universal health care that really is for the whole Universe! And, dig this. It won't cost a dollar! It can be funded entirely with recycled asteroids, easily processed into dry wall!" said William Jefferson, while he dried a cigar over a candle.

It was a funny evening. Al did his impressions of the living and Clinton, with his smooth and highly polished charm, in fact it was surprisingly shiny, eventually brought the whole table to a climax.

And my guests tonight are...

Hollywood used to have real stars.



Dear sports, this is a reply to a good post I got from Anonymous! It was regarding my piece called ‘Most celebrities have mediocre minds and think, say and do the same things’. I should be so lucky.

http://colonelrobertneville.blogspot.com/2007/11/most-celebrities-have-mediocre-minds.html


Dear Anonymous, we meet again. Now I know who you are! You're that guy, I think? Thanks for the comment though, and I appreciate anyone taking any interest at all. Your pointed post got me thinking. I guess I don’t really disagree with you per se. It’s just that it comes from another direction for me. And well, it’d be kind of curious to not comment on the dominance of celebrity in our culture, eh?

Though of course while every time has had it's celebrities, you must admit it’s a little er, oddly extreme today? As Mark Steyn has pointed out it’s often more an illusion how popular popular really is. Fame can now be so atomized, that no star today can actually be as big as the greatest were, say even a century ago. Caruso and various composers etc, dwarfed in scale of worldwide fame, in shear breadth of popularity and adulation, most of the current folks, God bless ‘em.

I guess for me, what stands out today, as opposed to how it seemed to be decades ago, maybe pre-Dylan, stars were well, just stars and that was mostly all they did publicly. That was enough it seems and what people apparently dug. They did some charity work, got drunk, got laid, took drugs, played golf, and went big game hunting in Africa or on Long Island!

Maybe it was often baloney but today you get all these mundane and relentlessly dreary facts about stars. And that’s what kinda spoils it for me. Once I knew that Robert Redford apparently got script guidance from the friends of Che the child killer for his ridiculous baloney of “Riding around on a motorcycle as a free Cuban will be punished by firing squad after the Revolution” or as it should be known, ‘The Murder Cycle Diaries’, well, I just can’t watch him anymore. Not even at his charming best in ‘Barefoot in the park’ or in ‘Bob looks old and weird’.

Almost every second celebrity it now seems, both considers themselves, and is even absurdly seen as, a kind of seer and fount of insight into economics, morals and the geopolitical. In reality, they’re still just getting drunk, taking drugs, drinking wheat grass juice and hiring high priced hookers. But without the style!

What's laughable is that many seem to have the same immature and fantasy based opinions that are totally opposite to any of their actions. Stars used to keep to themselves. How real that dignity and privacy was, well, I don't know, but it certainly seems light years from now.

Sure, not all Hollywood are merely very rich nuts, but as the rare and expressed Conservative Bruce Willis has said, if you want to work, keep your cards to yourself. He spoke of how many Tinfoil City people are actually Conservative, but don't tell. People you wouldn't guess. But er hum, Hollywood is more "McCarthyist" than HUAC ever was. It's just all Left Liberals now.

"Are you, or have you ever been a member of the Republican Party?" Liberal HUAC interrogator or 'Hollywood Unctious Activist Crap'.

"I'll never name names, not even Bruce Willis! Is that mike on?" Bruce Willis.

And look, if you hung out with some of these Leftist hobbyist stars, they'd probably be a lot of fun and generous...for a while. But on many serious things that they can and do have an effect and some power over, well, their heads are on wrong. If they weren't protected by such massive privelege...

It's weird that people find much 'star' quality at all in people they know far too much about and that turn out quite often to be uninteresting bores, and for good reason. It’s hard to be a bore when you’ve been a bomber pilot like Jimmy Stewart or a circus performer like Burt Lancaster or escaped poverty through incredible effort like Richard Burton, who could recite Shakespeare backwards, and not just the name.

Maybe it was the often fake and finally empty rebellions of the 60’s, the decade that never really happened for most regular people, that ruined it for the idea of what a star is. If not that, the following decades maybe didn’t help in the old depth and mystery stakes, not when every second celeb wanted to be a hip and happenin’ rebel in exactly the same way.

"Hey, have a coke. I'll get the front end loader and a length of PVC pipe!"

Witness how extreme the faux causes and opinions can be now, or at least since the 1960's and Washington Jane. Openly bloated narcissism and treason is back in screaming vogue, sports. Sure, a washed up Errol Flynn thought that the Child Killer Twins, Che and Fidel, were terrific, but Flynn ended up virtually friendless. Today, that kind of behavior would just make you one of the dozens of Hollywood guys, jetting off to the island of 300 torture prisons for a few laughs.

Sure, yesterday's stars may have even been a lot of freaks too, who knows? Unlikely for many though, and they weren't freaks on continuous parade. And many had a real life outside of celebrity. Many old stars did have authentic charm, style and cache that still holds up, a ‘something’ that this mornings Tinsel Town folks would sell their black souls for.

And it’s an odd thing too; the old stars were usually seen as otherworldly and mysterious beings at precisely the time that they most related to their audience and in the films they made. Conversely, as today’s celebrities are more and more touted as being just regular people, the movies they make are more likely to not relate to the majority of regular people, their lives or values, which many celebs seem to openly despise.

This is in spite of film and TV premises that allegedly reflect exactly that, the ‘searing realism’ of a $200 million budget and perfect looking people.

Look, I often have little to no sentimentality, and can find old movies as lame, dated and made up of cheesy tedium as anyone else. Sadly, the latest films can often follow this same magic formula.

I like new stuff if I can get it, but 'new' is not version three of the film I saw last year. Yep, there are many wonderful people working in film, TV and so on and far better than my non showing, that’s for sure. While there’s nothing as dated as the latest thing, sometimes that thing becomes the something that works, lasts, influences and thus becomes the same old rubbish that sickens not just young people.

It becomes something worthwhile because it either inherently is, or for the context of its appearance, or it’s just pure fun and entertainment. Which are the main game in the end and admirable goals in themselves. Try being entertaining. My Japanese wife says straight out “Why is that funny? You are not funny!” You can’t argue with Japanese quality control, no matter how humourless.

It’s amazing anything creative works out, especially movies. Movies are the cultural language so they say, and still amazingly great value for money. Look what you get for around fifteen dollars. The same twelve people in forty five films! I just wish so much of it didn’t blur into another “Oh oh! Guaranteed to tank again!”

I guess it may have something to do with choice; with such a fast moving and huge range of filmed mediocrity and even great work, but starring too often the same few people. When asked for often absurdly identical and by the numbers opinions, too many seem almost invariably unable to think beyond something resembling the eternal student activist. If a chat show has three guests, at least one or more will mention how “BushIsAmoron, IsAnEvilMastermind, IsHitler! Ha, ha!” Cue audience auto approval and smiles all round by a couple of actors, your guarantee of intellectual rigour.

Perhaps it doesn’t bode well that many films are made by a relatively small group of repeat offender Hollywood loons whose 'material' seems at base cynical, and to despise much about the ordinary public. It could be that this just doesn't always resonate so well with everybody? A 90% failure rate would sink most other kinds of business, but that's Tinsel Town Rebellion for you.

But what do I know? I just know that guests worth catching on Michael Parkinson are getting thinner on the ground all the time, and not just because Orson Welles is dead. All the best, mysterious stranger.

The anonymous Colonel Neville.




PS. Here's a very cool related piece by Mark Steyn, on the old and new stars and of the old and new versions of 'Oceans Eleven'. He's as usual, on the money and entertaining. And that's showbiz!

http://www.steynonline.com/content/view/659/28/

Chisel 'Conversations' and the wonderful contradictions of the Left.

Theo Van Gogh is one of the many lucky Europeans who have gained so much from engaging in a conversation with the second, and currently far more successful Islamic expansion into Europe.



"Conversations, Conversations. Breakfast show to a sleepy nation”.

Thus go the lyrics to the roaring song ‘Conversation’ by Cold Chisel, the greatest Australian band ever and one of the best anywhere, sport. It’s funny what dumbness, either wilful or at the naturally occurring ceiling of MSM mediocrity you can catch in passing. I heard the following radio snippet maybe on the ABC?

A guy from Britain was saying that the name ‘Muslim’ had become like ‘Nazi’, in the UK, because wait for it, people were associating Muslims with no good news. Gee, I wonder why? Maybe something to do with Iran and every other Islamic nation wishing to destroy Israel and murder all Jews everywhere? Could be.

Aah, dear reader, the idiot went on to explain. British people are just bigots! Oh, the same ones who let so many in, ya mean? Yes, anyone who is repulsed by the repulsive bombing acts and beheadings of their citizens by the orgasmic practitioners of an insane religion like Islam is a bigot. Why people don’t just celebrate cultural diversity and inclusiveness after every bomb blast, I don’t know. Sticks in the mud! Oh, they do? In the Middle East? Right, and in much of the Muslim areas of Britain.

Now the kicker is that the idiot on air, then extrapolated to the moon and back, by equating an entirely logical fear of Islam and Muslim threats, to the persecution of Jews by the Nazis! Yes, I get whiplash following the automatic apologia for Islam via mental gymnastics myself. Rubber neckin’, I’m just rubber neckin’!

So, what I’ve realised, and more so everyday, is that the mentally ill Left, PC Liberal and Multicultural Cultural Suicide Brigade are entirely made of contradictions. Every non-idea of the PC or Leftoid, has a corresponding contradiction that leads to another contradiction, until it looks like jungle undergrowth; but in place of fecund and alive, it’s entirely and utterly sterile. Every freak birth of Leftism and Liberalism is born dead, baby.

So, let me get this talentless shites insight right if I might, alright. Er, the Jews, who are the main target of Islamist Muslims, after 'moderate' Muslims and any critics of Islam, are used as a handy cipher to blame Britons who are under actual empirical attack, threat and infiltration by thousands of Muslims who are impossible to assimilate? This is entirely because they're uninterested in Western culture and traditions at all, except to use this same heritage to destroy it and us, because they despise the West and us, as they do anything not Islamic. Ok?

And this proves that Britons are using the feeble excuses of being blasted into pieces and cultural collapse, merely to be bigots? Right. Current topsy turvy inverted subject change Left Liberal baloney. Check.

And this makes them like Nazis but the Muslims are the Jews, even though the Muslims say clearly in public, in protests, in every survey, as they do across the world, that a majority would want an Islamic UK, France, Belgium and Norway etc, Sharia Law and support violence, up to and including Bin Laden? Check. Um, so the Jews of Nazi Germany threatened to turn Germany Hasidic, planted bombs and had violent loud demonstrations in the street, to which the Nazi authorities spinelessly acquiesced? Um, er, no. Not without the old crazy pills.

So, this freak can get on a major radio service, spout outrageously stupid Logical Fallacy’s to the point of no return, and not be held accountable? Yep, that about sums up the state of play of 95% of the Main Stream Media in Australia.

But that’s the thing, sports; the Left, the Liberal, the Radical, the Islamist and Muslim, and in the end the Communist and Nazi, Nationalist Dictator ad nauseum etc, all float entirely on a vast sea of raw sewage and contradictions. The Left are ‘for the people’ but they still usually embrace much of the pure ideology of Communism that has murdered over 100 million people. They have hideous heroes like Che the child killer, spoiled, failed medical student, narcissist, sadist, buffoon, bungler and coward Guevara, who loved murdering people, any people.

They hate the steady, proven, enormously popular and naturally triumphant success of Capitalist Democracy’s, free markets and freedoms that have done more to vastly improve the health, wealth and freedom of ordinary people in 150 years than every other system throughout history combined. Because this lacks the required drama and a position centre stage for 'our hero!'

No Himalaya of evidence can change such a mind because they live entirely in the world of emotional and symmetrical thinking, completely unconnected to any reality but their own surging passions. Let me put it plainly; none, I repeat none of the non-ideas of Leftism have ever worked ever and never will.

These non-ideas may appear to do so as they are forced onto the deluded, passive and powerless, or are promoted hungrily by the strangely eager with ulterior motives, but they are all, my friends, always in the process of being discredited. The people just have to live or die through its experimental Hell. It takes a lot of dishonesty, trickery and ignorance to hide this in such clear view. But it's all so clearly there, for those who want to see.

None have any track record of success in the past whatsoever. And that’s why the earnest people who get so enervated by such utter junk and lies, get so instantly and entirely angry if you criticize any part of their absurd rubbish. No matter how cleverly and disingenuously they may cloak it in a fashionable cause, it's still the same polished turd.

They get upset because 'you’re stepping on a dream!' Their dream, that’s never happened and never can, but according to them, is just around a mythical corner in the not too distant future, if only we would listen and recklessly jump off the abyss together. It’s only ever come true as a nightmare and quite naturally, as it can do and 'achieve' nothing else.

Thus the classic Communist and Socialist posters of people staring boldly, passionately and resolutely into a bright future of absolute conformity and inhumanity.

"After we build 10,000 more crudely designed, unwanted and unusable tractors, it's on to Workers Paradise for a chocolate sundae!"

The Left of course, have the same five basic ideas as Communism. Communism is based firstly on its main engine and main purpose of murder. It’s always in the beginning and in the end, all about murder, it ain’t never been about conversation or alternative opinions and lifestyles, baby. It’s the original one dimensional mono style. Communism, Leftism, Nazism etc, they all hate individuals.

So, Communism and by default all Leftism, is based entirely on murder, lies, conformity, envy and spite. Once they’re in power, all of them always follow the exact and invariably the same pattern, their entire Modus Operandi is based on this.

There’s no alternative, as Totalitarianism feeds entirely off its only real resource; the lives of human beings that they destroy via mass murder. Thus there is always the endless hunting for “enemies” to add to the endless lists, of those to be murdered. And all “for the people!” An abomination created by monstrous people for the mad.

Marx and Lenin were insane psychopaths; sly, cold and manipulative people. They were like all such misfits; real life hating, mechanical and profoundly mediocre freaks fit for nothing in a successful and normal society. So they have to create the madhouse in which they can operate freely. In this way they can imagine and believe that they are actually somebody of note, as they swagger, posture, hate, plot, lie and murder as many human beings as fast as they can.

The non-ideas of the Left are not working now, no matter how currently fashionable and funded entirely by the state via the taxpayer. We are being buried alive in this bunkum; our children are being exposed and indoctrinated with this sickness, via the MSM, entertainment and an often debased educational system. The political ideology and ultimate goals of the Left are a natural vortex of high emotion and extremely urgent moral vanity which at base is about controlling the state and absolute power, a vortex which can never be satisfied and into which everything is sucked to destruction.

This never matters to any Leftist, Radical or even the softest of Liberals, really. An empirical result means nothing as time means nothing, as cause and effect mean nothing as the murder of 100 million souls means nothing.

I wonder how much longer we can all snooze in our bed, free of the terrors of Islamisation and indeed, the natural end logic of Leftism? Hmmmm? Sleep on this, sports. Colonel Neville.




"It would not matter if three quarters of the human race perished...the important thing is that the remaining one quarter be Communist". V. I. Lenin.

"... the very cannibalism of the counterrevolution will convince the nations that there is only one way in which the murderous death agonies of the old society and the bloody birth throes of the new society can be shortened, simplified and concentrated, and that way is revolutionary terror." Karl Marx. "The Victory of the Counter-Revolution in Vienna," Neue Rheinische Zeitung, November 7, 1848.


"I come to the inescapable conclusion that we must now launch the most decisive and merciless battle against the Black Hundreds clergy and crush their resistance with such ferocity that they will not forget it for several decades... The bigger the number of reactionary clergy and reactionary bourgeois we manage to shoot in the process, the better." V. I. Lenin. Dmitri Volkogonov, Trotsky: The Eternal Revolutionary [London: Harper Collins, 1996], p227.


"To send men to the firing squad, judicial proof is unnecessary. These procedures are an archaic bourgeois detail. This is a revolution! And a revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate. We must create the pedagogy of the ‘The Wall!

(Editors note: 'The Wall', or 'El Paredón' means an actual and notorious firing squad wall.)

Crazy with fury I will stain my rifle red while slaughtering any enemy that falls in my hands! My nostrils dilate while savouring the acrid odour of gunpowder and blood. With the deaths of my enemies I prepare my being for the sacred fight and join the triumphant proletariat with a bestial howl!

Hatred as an element of struggle; unbending hatred for the enemy, which pushes a human being beyond his natural limitations, making him into an effective, violent, selective and cold-blooded killing machine. This is what our soldiers must become”. Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara.

The four stages of Islamic treachery.

British Muslims love nothing better than celebrating diversity. You can have any religion you want, as long as it's Islam.



This is an ESSENTIAL post from Tuesday 13 November 2007. I dedicate this post to Brigitte Gabriel who can tell you all about how a free capitalist democracy and tolerant multicultural state is automatically doomed to destruction by naive openness when a Muslim percentage move into the neighbourhood.

Therfore, without the required serious changes that I see zero evidence of ever happening, we ARE all doomed. No doubt.

To save ourselves, everything we value and love and to free millions of Muslim prisoners born into the retarded Hell of Islam, well, we must destroy Islam befor it destroys them and YOU and me. We'll have to sooner of later. Just like Nazism, Fascism and Bushido were destroyed and Communism soon too, I hope. It is as they say, inevitable what me MUST do in order to not just survive, but triumph in victory.

The alternative is DEATH, DHIMMITUDE and DISHONOUR.

And folks, once it's all gone, we'll never return again to our bright flickering light of capitalist democracy and freedom that has come like a miracle out of the long dark tunnel of history. Here 'tis. Colonel Neville.



Dear sports, here's a terrific list that may ring a few bells of recognition in even the most disingenuous, denial sodden, security and cultural suicide doomed, merry non-stop dancer to utter defeat, self loathing and totally unresearched Islam apologist Dhimmi fool. And as we know, the West has a current undying plague of them. Enjoy the meagre laughs to be had, as we stare into the Abyss streaming straight into the West from the Middle-East AKA Gods Monkey House.



'The Four stages of Islamic Treachery and Islamist Tactics and Strategy toward Non-Islamic Societies', by Anonymous 01 Sep, 2007. Please note that this article is not copyrighted and may be freely reproduced or published by anyone. Based on the evidence of 1300 years of Islamic history.


Introduction:

Fact 1.

The goal of Islam is the subjugation of the entire world to Islam through the establishment of global Islamic rule or Caliphate and the eradication of all non-Islamic populations, cultures, religions, thoughts, knowledge, symbols, traditions and ways of life. This goal is non-negotiable and is in the fundamental doctrines of Islam and is a matter of pure fact in the eyes of true Muslims.

Fact 2.

Islamists will not stop their assaults either open or clandestine, on the non-Muslim world as long as they have not achieved Islamic rule.

Fact 3:

In Islamic teaching, the end always justifies the means. Islamists have no respect for the rules, laws or values of the non-Islamic world, to them only the rules of the Islamic world are legitimate. In their mind, when they destroy the non-Islamic world, then the rules will change to Islamic rules, laws and values.

Fact 4:

Islamists consider treaties with non-Muslims non-binding.. When in non-Muslim countries they will pretend the required social behaviours as a cover up to their true intentions, of domination over the non Muslim world.

Tip: When it comes to Islamists, always look at what they do and not just what they say. Treachery and deceit are the Islamists' tactic of choice in their Jihad of Conquest regards the non-Muslim world. This tactic of al-taqiyaa, or religious deception, pretending to be friends of the Non-Muslims in order to strengthen themselves against them, is a common practice by Islamists.
Deception is the key tactic employed by Islamists.

Fact 5.

As a rule of thumb to get the truth from any Islamist, simply reverse what they say to a non-Muslim.

Fact 6.

The founder of Islam, Mohammad, was an Islamist. Whether you able to face or ignore this harsh reality is beside the point, you will inevitably face its truth on the day you find yourself within the killing zone of Islamists.


The stages of Islamization.

Stage One: Infiltration.

• First migration wave to target non-Muslim society.
• Appeal for humanitarian tolerance from the target non-Muslim society.
• Characterized by professed tolerance of others and their beliefs.
• Attempts to portray Islam as a peaceful religion and Muslims as victims of misunderstanding and racism.

• Images of women and children used to portray Muslims.
• Establishment of mosques as power bases. Today these are often globally funded by Gulf countries oil revenue. Mosques are safe havens for Jihadist recruitment and subversive projects.

• Muslim leaders promote large push for increased Muslim births in target non-Muslim society to increase native Muslim population.
• Misrepresentation of their intentions or aims as a cover up for clandestine operations.


Stage Two: Consolidation of Power.

• Proselytizing efforts increase.
• Establishment and recruitment of fundamentalist Jihadist cells.
• Efforts to convert alienated segments of the population of target non-Muslim society to Islam.
• Revisionist efforts to Islamize history.

• Efforts to destroy all evidence of incriminating historical evidence and sources that reveal true character of Islamism.
• Intellectual Jihad to discredit non-Muslim culture.
• Assault on cultural assumptions and icons of the non-Muslim world, such as democracy, law and science.
• Increased dissemination of anti-Western propaganda and anti-Western psychological warfare.

• Efforts to recruit allies who share similar goals. Communists, socialists, anti -Western activists, anti-globalists and anarchists etc.
• Alliances with the enemies of Western society particularly anti-Capitalism Leftists. "The enemy of my enemy is my friend".
• Attempts to indoctrinate children to Islamist viewpoint. Efforts to infiltrate education system to propagate pro-Islamic points of view.
• Increased efforts to intimidate, silence and eliminate non-Muslim intellectuals and leaders.

• Efforts to introduce blasphemy laws into non-Muslim society in order to silence critics.
• Continued focus on enlarging Muslim population by increasing Muslim births and migration to target non-Muslim society.
• Use of first and second generation Muslim citizens of target non-Muslim society, as Jihadist foot soldiers and public fronts.
• Use of charities to recruit supporters.

• Use of crime and fraud to obtain funds to finance activities.
• Covert efforts to bring about the destruction of non-Muslim society from within.
• Development of Muslim political base in target non-Muslim society. Efforts to penetrate political and legal structure of country so as to support Islamic growth from within.

• Use of bribes and blackmail of non-Muslim authorities to get them to disregard establishment of subversive activities.
• Islamic Financial networks strengthened to fund political growth, large acquisition of land and resources by any means. Today they are funded by Muslim charities; Gulf countries oil revenues and criminal activities.

• Highly visible assassination of critics aimed to intimidate opposition.
• Tolerance of non-Muslims diminishes and greater demands are placed upon Muslims to adopt strict Islamic conduct.
• Clandestine amassing of weapons and explosives stores in hidden locations in target non-Muslim society.

• Continuous and covert attacks and challenges against target non-Muslim society leaders and religious symbols.
• Overt disregard and rejection of target non-Muslim society's legal system and culture.
• Efforts to undermine and destroy power base of non-Muslim religions such as Jews, Christians, Hindus or Buddhists in target non-Muslim society.
• Efforts to destroy the social structure of the country and bring the downfall of non-Muslim government.

• Use of Islamic gangs in campaign of fear and terror against Jews, Christians, Hindus and non-Muslims to reduce their populations and influence in the target non-Muslim society.


Stage Three: Open war with target non-Islamist society’s Leadership and culture.

• Large-scale destruction of population, assassinations, killings, bombings.
• Intentional efforts to spread chaos in the target country to undermine its government and culture.
• Acts of barbarity and fierceness as a deliberate policy intended to foster submission of opponents.
• Open and covert efforts to cause economic collapse of the society.

• All opposition, no matter what kind, is challenged and either eradicated or silenced.
• Widespread ethnic cleansing with Islamic militias.
• Rejection and defiance of target society secular laws or culture.
• Murder of all opposition political, religious and intellectual leaders of target society.

• Murder of all moderate Muslim intellectuals who envision other alternatives to radical Islam.
• Toppling of Government and usurpation of political power.
• Imposition of Sharia law.
• Mass execution of non-Muslims, ethnic cleansing.


Stage Four: Islamic Theocracy.

• The Koran (Qur’an) and the Sharia becomes the ‘Law of the Land.
• All non-Islamic human rights cancelled.
• Freedom of speech and the press eradicated.
• All Religions other than Islam are forbidden and destroyed.
• Enslavement and genocide of non-Muslim population.
• Destruction of all evidence of non-Muslim culture, groups and symbols within the country.

Mad Mo Mohammad, the Krazy Koran and the "filth of Islam" are a real drag.

Even as a baby, Mohammad was totally out of his freakin' mind.


Dear sports, here is a cool review from Amazon dot com, of Robert Spencer’s DVD, ‘Islam: What the West needs to know’. As you imagine, it’s all about the Krazy Koran, and as Christopher Hitchens recently and accurately described Islam’s empirical and crude reality as the “filth of Islam” and of course, your favourite party dude and laughter cadet, Mad Mo Mohammad.

It’s by ‘Sparkles’ and the link is at the end of the piece and his many other reviews are worth reading. I have made edits for ease of reading.So here's 'Sparkles'.



A couple of years ago I decided I needed to become informed regarding Islam, so I began. All told, I guess I've read about 40 books and now have a pretty good idea about what it is. The first book I went out and bought and read, was the Koran, because I thought l may as well go to the source and get the info straight.

Contra to earlier reviewers, reading the Koran did not convert me, nor was it a magic bullet and knock over evidence in favour of Islam.

In fact, to quote Thomas Carlyle in the excellent book `Secrets of the Koran' by Don Richardson, the Koran is, "A wearisome jumble, crude, incondite [with] endless iterations [and] longwindedness...Nothing but a sense of duty could carry any European through the Koran”. And so it was with me.

I slogged through it, not because it was brilliant, gripping and diverse literature, it most certainly is not. Rather drab and uniform from beginning to end, despite its Hellfire and damnation on virtually every page, neither did it have the ring of truth and the Divine about it, it most certainly did not. It is the most turgid, boring and incomprehensible writing I have ever read.

And according to Richardson, it is even more incomprehensible in Arabic! It is more comprehensible in translation because at least in a translation, the translator tries to make what is being translated comprehensible! But then of course, a translation is not THE Koran, as only the Koran in Arabic, the Holy tongue, is the Koran, so I never really read the Koran did I, and no one who does not know Arabic can do so!

Dear Saleem, where did you get that ridiculous statistic that 3 out of 4 people who read the Koran accepts Islam? I'm sure that huge numbers of Westerners have read the Koran in the last few years, though most have not been converted but repulsed by it. I imagine like me they read it so as to become informed.

Well...in my reading, I came to cut through all the baloney being put out by idiot PC Western leaders who to this day, keep assuring us that Islam is a `religion of peace', and that it’s only a few disaffected Moslems who have hijacked the ‘great religion' who are a threat to the West.

It became abundantly clear, that it’s Islam itself, built on the explicit teachings of the Koran and Hadiths, and on the example of the Islamic `perfect man' Mohammed, which is the threat. 1400 years of these explicit teachings and the following of Mo’s example has wreaked death, destruction and slavery over a vast area and on a mind numbing scale. Today the same thing is occurring all around the world. When a bomb goes off somewhere, you can almost guarantee, 99 times out of 100, Moslems planted it.

The talk about moderate or peaceful Moslems, radical, jihadist and terrorist Moslems is I think, a false dichotomy. Rather what you have are inconsistent Moslems and consistent Moslems, and the consistent, orthodox ones are the radicals and jihadists because they follow the Koran and the example of Mohammed, and the others, for whatever reason, don't.

The only place it appears you can have ‘reformist' Muslims is in the West, because in Islamic countries, reformists end up as dead heretics. But then in the West you have the workings of `taqiyya', the Koranic practice of Muslims lying to further the Islamic cause. At the end of the day, can any Muslim in the West be trusted? With taqiyya as a Mohammed established and authorised doctrine, I don't see how they can be.

So...when I heard that `Islam: What the West Needs to Know' was available, I purchased it immediately, and it confirmed what I had already discovered. It’s not entertainment, nor can it be called a nice DVD, but never the less should be required viewing. It has no razzamatazz or glitz whatever, but is solid information from beginning to end. The juxtaposition of Western leaders making their starry eyed public statements, with far blunter statements of Islamic authorities contradicting them, was most enlightening.

Where do Western leaders get their information from? Muslims practising taqiyya?

The technical quality could be improved, but that should not get in the way, nor be allowed to. The content is clear and unemotional, coming from people who know the subject inside out. And, with it simply examining the actual words of Islamic authorities, and avoiding second hand or adversarial sources, it plays the strongest hand possible. I highly recommended it.

I would suggest to the makers of it, perhaps they are already planning or working on this, that they put out a second version with upgraded illustrations and more of them. When anything can be illustrated it should be. This would make it more accessible for more people and be more visually interesting.



http://www.amazon.com/gp/cdp/member-reviews/A34L5JFLM6XJGI/ref=cm_pdp_profile_reviews?ie=UTF8&sort%5Fby=MostRecentReview

Most celebrities have mediocre minds and think, say and do the same things.

Hollywood actress Radha 'Waht?' Mitchell, has found guidance through her personal guru and teacher, Patagonia Pete, pictured here at his Burbank spiritual retreat. "Why can't we all just smile endlessly?" is one of Pete's most moving insights and something Radha tries to live by.



“She may be a citizen of the world, but Melbourne born, Hollywood bred, LA based actress Radha Mitchell, will have her say come election time”. And Rhada, like most celebrities, has absolutely nothing whatsoever to say.

The time spent in the previous geographical locations can explain a lot, and the world inhabited by 'Radar' Mitchell, the worthless opinion and clueless ‘go to girl’, is the tiny vacuum sealed world of Hollywood Land. A place where 90% failure is the perfect proof and reason to do exactly the same things over and over again, except more so. Because in the end, they mostly all think the same, no matter what the empirical evidence to the contrary.

She’s “hugely talented”, yet needs help with voting. “I’ve asked somebody to help me out me out with that, just to get the thing to the ballot or whatever”. Riiight. Huge talent. Try reading the pamphlet at the post office? It’s a two page gatefold.

RADA Michell is currently researching her most challenging role yet, as ‘The Postal Voter’.

Yep, currently in town to promote her latest Masterpiece inspired by Kubrick and Welles. That's Arthur Kubrick the dentist and Cyril Welles the plastic surgeon. It's called ‘Rogue’ and 'stars' a computer generated crocodile. Who says Hollywood is shallow, repetitive and dry of ideas? Not me, fella. Wow! A giant crocodile! On the loose! Outstanding. Crazy.

Now after ten years in La La Land, Rada Dada who surprisingly is not a big reader of er, things with words, yes, books! Or literary journalism and whatever, is now ready to advise all comers on the direction of the economy, security, geopolitical stuff and er, like, whatever.

“Just get that guy out, you know?” Er, like, totally rad and whack, Radha! “Get rid of him. Move on. It’s not just the economy that drives the next evolution of where society is going”. Er, let’s stop and savour the airhead parody right there, sports.

“Move on”. Little spoiled, affluent and shrink wrapped Mitch can’t really stop from talking in any situation above how she would with her girlfriends. ‘Move on Gisela! That Aussie PM guy was no good for you. He just wanted to use you for your military insights, economic analysis and your perky breasts!’

Er, Mitchy, the economy is entirely what drives everything. What is the mysterious other thing? She doesn’t say…See how it’s a dramatic “evolution” instead of a normal and mature idea like er, steady, realistic and practical improvement, like at a hospital, a kindergarten or a big movie business etc. Well, maybe not a movie business per se.

It's like we’re all going to become Pan like field sprites and frolic with our Unicorn friends. Where “should we be going?” She doesn’t say. LA? Reno? Frankston? She doesn’t say… Gee, ain't the millions of dollars you've made from Capitalism any good? Guess not...good grief, Charlie Clown.

Um, isn’t the fact of a super successful Capitalist Democracy and free markets exactly what drives the ability to make Rads next maybe straight to video disaster flopperooni? Isn’t being a movie star in er, LA, utterly and only about conspicuous consumption, entertainment, fame and image shmimage? Er, and making cart loads of more money? Could be. But please Rads, do drivel on.

She says she doesn’t read Australian newspapers, meaning she don’t read, “she don’t like, that kind of behaviour”, she don’t read! Instead relying on more “informal sources such as TV” and “my Mum on the phone!” I kid you not.

‘This just in from Ma, the inside scoop on the trade deficit figures for Belgium, tensions in the EU and all the goss about Prime Minister Merkel’. This is the real part sports, and she says, “What’s going on? Oh, there’s a drought?” And she’s ready to go!

And of course, no celebrity twerp floating on a cloud of privileged and pampered abstraction is without their amorphous and fraudulent, “I’m a citizen of the world!” posturing. Yeah, but they all seem to have similar postal addresses though; always the affluent and free West.

Sayeth the fatuous and flatulent one, “I have more of a global point of view”. The view being entirely imaginary. “I do feel the environment is a big issue”. Hey, that’s all you need. Just “feel” it. Because there's nothing more to it. “And obviously we need to pay attention to the sense of impotence about global poverty, which is a bit pathetic”. Really?

So we can cure poverty if we all get more erections? Er, and couldn’t lessening poverty have something to do with um, building “economies?” Yes, celebrities mostly are pathetic whenever they speak without a script. It’s just that they have a very loud and totally unaccountable voice, you see, but it’s nearly all an undergraduate and juvenile drivelling bore, at least to the intelligent and sane.

She’s eager to “back her words with action!” What action? She doesn’t say…Oh, this is the celebrity idea of action, like a neo hippie festival to stop the Muslim Militia from murdering 2,000,000 more Darfurians.

“Hey Mohammad! We gotta stop with the raping and beheading of children. They’re dancing in California! I can hear the out of sync drum circle from here”.

Says the star that shines so bright above us dull mortals, “It’s almost like we’ve reached the point where we can redesign our concept of culture, like we don’t have to accept the way things are!” Gee, just like Pol Pot! This is the end result of being stoned at 3: AM in a Bel Air mansion.

So Radha's Grand Slam Plan for ending world poverty in the Third and Developing Worlds involves a profound understanding and the promotion of civil accountable government, effective free market economics, free press, ending corruption, tribalism and so on? Er, nope. That's not the boring and totally unfashionable level of hard reality any frivolous rich celebrity ever 'thinks' on.

And that's the great thing about the anonymous and voiceless poor and the entire reason for their popularity as an amorphous and handy abstraction; so ideal for the projections of the venal poser.

You don't need to know anything at all about the poor and powerless to speak on their behalf for what they should want, and for how they should live and die. Any celebrity vampire, eager for their 'Hero of the People' cred, can simply adopt and drop the easy to ignore masses at will.

Nobody is gonna ever hold these bloated Hollywood and LA freaks to account, whatever the consequences, and usually entirely in the negative. Yep, what the starving, silently dying and electricity free want, is to get involved to the death, with an affluent and middle class fashionable environmental hobby. They don't need the power to run hospitals, factories, airports, railways, massive film studios or luxurious Manhattan apartments. No, that's only for movie stars.


Says the article in ‘The Age’ for November 07 2007, “She’d like to set up an office for Global Green”, etc and ad nauseum. Big surprise, eh? Yep, movie stars are well known for their frugal lifestyles and humble needs, but they do have vast appetites for preaching to the plebs, don’t they just, eh?

“I might do that, but I’m no politician”. I often wonder exactly what many public figures are beyond being mildly amusing, slightly diversionary, mostly dispensable and utterly useless. “I would just help by being somebody who knows somebody, who knows somebody”.

Hey, everybody loves somebody, sometime, especially in LA, and sometimes even one at a time. And not always only themselves.

Venezuela’s first stripe assed baboon President Huge Chimpass, marries Hollywood actor Sean ‘Shorty’ Penn.

Sean Penn pictured here in his official wedding portrait.


Following a whirlwind romance between the simian leader who was once billed in the Ramirez Brothers Circus as “Chuckles”, and Hollywood star Sean Penn, who has won multiple kudos for his many acts of high treason; the deeply in love pair were married today in a no execution spared wedding at the nations newly renamed Capital of El Crackers. Penn first went to Venezuela as a break from the many hard won fist fights with girlfriends.

As Sean quipped, “I needed a break from breaking teeth! Sure, I have my body guards, so the menacing entourage amongst the plebs is cool, but I really wanted to find someone I had a lot in common with, like a real old time ‘Anti-USA Latin American Crank’, whose completely insane and dumb as a post. Sure, I have a vast range of Che ‘the child killer’ Guevara T-shirts for easy cred, but I really need real rebel credentials no matter how fraudulent. And as a spoiled, venal and basically stupid Hollywood freak, that’s almost impossible. Also I really always wanted to marry a baboon”.

Penn was first smitten by the larger than a van President, when Sean and his fellow Hollywood pals Tim ‘Moral Gymnast’ Robbins, Kevin 'Praise that Dictator' Spacey, George ‘Handsome Clod’ Clooney and Harry ‘Quisling Two Faced Geek’ Belafonte, were all called in to record their enthusiastic applause as only true Hollywood stars can, for the compulsory TV show ‘The Anti-Imperialist Firing Squad Hour’. Contestants win prizes for making up the best ‘Crime against the Revolution’ and for guessing the day’s political slogan.

Penn mentions that “It’s not so easy, as it can change at any moment. Once it was all for eating cheese and then switched back against eating it and was even both for and against simultaneously! Once it was neither but the penalty for being non-committal was still death! It was some crazy times, man! I love this country!”

Does Penn worry that this could affect his career? “Sure”, says Penn, “but I figure I can handle the extra success”.

I asked Sean what he thought of the people who say he lives in a fantasy life completely supported by the system he despises. “I thank those people for their support”, said Penn with a cheery laugh.

So what’s planned for the honeymoon? “Well, we were going to spend a few days drawing up lists of ‘Enemies of the People’, but decided to spend some time together just goin’ ape shit! Huge is a total mediocrity without the vast apparatus that supports him and not just personality wise. But, we do have it! So just like in Hollywood, we’re gonna get to endlessly spout our hypocritical and crazy opinions and enforce them, in between drugs, wild sex and violence. The only difference with being Mrs President Chimpez and Tinsel Town is that you can actually shoot the people who dare to disagree with you. I’m having a ball, man”.

The bride and groom wore matching olive drabs from Sy Devore of Hollywood, even though he’s been dead since 1966.

A book filled entirely with words.

Award winning author, Miles O'Cant, pictured arriving at a recent book signing and sweat lodge.


The following is a transcript of an interview on the ABC radio program 'Authors and People'.

"Good evening and welcome to Government Funded Rebellion, and this is your host Tim Comfortable. My guest tonight is author and social critic, Miles O’Cant. I’ll be discussing his latest controversial book ‘If you don’t agree with me, you’re a Fascist: How my Left friends and I are always right about everything’.

Thankyou for coming on the show tonight Miles, and congratulations on winning the State Government Funded Award for ‘A Book filled Entirely with Words’. I believe that brings your total of prestigious taxpayer funded awards to around 127?"

Miles: “ Thank you Tim. Yes, but awards mean nothing to me. They’re meaningless, absolutely without meaning. As is the $850,000 prize money. Just yesterday I received a financial statement from my accountant and I thought how this enormous cash deposit is meaningless. Money means nothing to me. It’s the writing, the art of it all and making a difference. And it’s actually 128 awards, but again, this is entirely meaningless”.

Tim: “I agree, I find even the perks meaningless. The free gifts, being virtually impossible to fire and having an unaccountable free reign to push my Left opinions sans action for decades on end, the mutual backslapping,…all meaningless. Now your first published title and winner of the prestigious 'Boredom Award', established you as a major literary force. And that was for the Teacher’s Union Enforced children’s book, ‘This Fascist Government gave me Cancer’. It was thought controversial at the time, mostly by the Religious Right, merely because of the cannibalism. What was your inspiration and motive for the book?

Miles: “I wanted to show realistically and without hyperbole or exaggeration, the hopelessly depressing, suicidal and voiceless reality of young people’s crushed lives as they’ve grown up in the Fascist Regime of the current Nazi inspired government that is doing everything to destroy any dissent or freedom whatsoever. It’s an inspiring and entertaining read too”.

Tim: “You’re good friends with the Government Funded playwright, Glib Plaistow of course”.

Miles: “Yes, but Glib has an entirely different style to me. His plays are about the hopelessly depressing, suicidal and voiceless reality of middle class and middle aged people’s crushed lives as they’ve grown up in the Fascist Regime of the current Nazi inspired government that is doing everything to destroy any dissent or freedom whatsoever”.

Tim: “Could you describe for the listeners who may have not read your first book, some of the areas you cover?

Miles: “I felt that the true experiences of young people’s lives as I imagined them almost entirely in my mind, has been ignored by much of the so called mainstream. I wanted to focus not just on the cannibalism, but gun running, international drug rings, madness, ritual suicide, Devil worshipping, arson and golf”.

Tim: "I’ve never understood golf, it’s so elitist. Now some people, mostly of the Religious Right, have tried to silence you by calling you “insane” and “a dangerous bore”. Your thoughts Miles?"

Miles: “Aren’t we all really a little insane and dangerously boring? Especially those who have abducted children? But who are we to say, just because of outmoded and indeed judgemental ideas of right and wrong? I prefer to blend these subjective concepts into what I call ‘rung and rot’. I don’t know what they mean, but they certainly don’t discriminate”.

Tim: “Some critics, mostly of the Religious Right, have said that your books are absurdly focused on a laughably dark vision of young people, when the reality is that most of those in affluent Capitalist Democracies have pretty good and normal lives. Nonsense?”

Miles: “It's nonsense to not realise that any child like that is a brainwashed weirdo!”

Tim: “Where do your ideas come from, apart from real life as you see it?”

Miles: “It all comes from my mind, Tim. My mind is like a vast landscape. Of course there’s dirt, small shrubs and even deciduous trees and is that a zebra?”

Tim: “A zebra? No that’s Doris, our tea lady”.

Miles: “She looks like a zebra! Get away from me!”

Tim: “Miles, is that a gun or a knife with a trigger?”

Miles: “You’re a Fascist and a zebra and therefore you must die! Death to the Zebra Fascists!”

Judge not lest ye have no bleeding judgement.

Supreme Court Judge Lex Lasry ponders whether Islamism is all merely a fantastic 1300 year long fabrication by an unknown and secretive cabal, that just happen's to tie in with John Howard's Government. Incredible! But do you know that the CIA has trained fruit flies to read people's lips? It's true! Go to fruiters dot com! It's all there! Dick Cheney is breeding the flies in his cellar and has cornered the market via Halliburton and the wallpaper pattern has been bugged and...David Hicks is a Saint! Just like Al 'give me more power grid, cos' I'm leaving on a private jet plane' Gore...



Now I believe you can’t really stroke a hairless cat, but you can oil it. And like a perfectly formed, effective and spontaneous feline, it’s funny what an attuned sense of analysis may pick up just in passing.

And what it seems to show is the often apparent dominance and regularly unquestioning acceptance of the same repeated themes, such as they are. For instance, as I passed a room in a large facility that had a TV on, I overheard a rotund guest on a tedious morning show say, with the standard invisible and inverted commas, that according to him, the idea of American and by extension our freedom being under threat, is absurd. Yes, ok, whatever you wish to drivel, published Pilsener Dough Boy.

He looked up from his furrowed and hang dog pontificating and said with the look of a smarmy teenager, “When has our freedom ever been under threat?!” Er, riiight.

With only a few thrilling moments of info, I felt pretty confident that the overweight, glasses wearing guy on the old 'Tube of Death', was hawking a book presenting a standard pointy point of view of the Left and Liberal conspiracy infected. And I was 100% right.

The equation for the numerically absent is as always, “The USA and the West in general are bad, and any dysfunctional basket case is ALWAYS better and fully justified in ANY of their behaviour, however outrageous etc, etc”.

So, ah, over 9,000 known and extreme attacks by Islamist’s since 9/11, and almost 3,000 murdered on 9/11, but none had their freedom compromised in the slightest. Islam is entirely about our utter conversion, dhimmitude or death. I’d say that’s some kind of threat to our freedom, hmmm? Isn’t that the daily promise reinforced step by inexorable and hideous step? Er, there are also a few nuclear Commie vortex states too. Yep, you’re among friends here!

What credentials and credibility could such a Dhimmi fool possess? Zero, baby! The host’s of this cheap morning program just sucked it all in and smiled in idiot agreement. Now they were either being extremely diplomatic and they weren’t, or they’re of the usual MSM thickness of head, or they agreed. Yes, the all warped jury agreed, that’s the story of…

What is kind of overwhelming is the relentless acceptance, promotion and reinforcement of views that are neither true, decent nor sane.

How can so many be under clear attack for so long, and the only result is their pervasive and determined denial? What gives exactly? It seems a large proportion of the population are pretty actively reinforcing the causes of their own ignorance. The day before I believe, the same genial hostess of the pair was asked about the “downgrading of Christmas!” in Britain!

So what do you think she said? What would a profoundly unprofound journo hostoid say, while floating unchallenged and comfortable in the Main Steam Media’s vacuum and nullity of multi-culti orthodoxy? She agreed of course, because our traditions that mean little to nothing to the simple, shallow and uncomprehending, like her, can all be glibly jettisoned. And the same person does this in the name of PC abasement to another culture, which she automatically handles with kid gloves, and a default and patronising reverence.

That’s right! The way to national success is for the host country to become an obsequious and hollowed out husk. Yeah, that’s how to be respected by cultures that take their own history, beliefs and traditions entirely and absolutely seriously, without the slightest intention of any compromise. But that’s Western Cultural Suicide for you, sports.

Now this was just in passing, on some endlessly boring and mediocre daytime tripe time filler. So, ok, lots of people have little to no insight, thinking skills, analysis and so on, outside of their specialty, which pretty much describes most of my life. If only I had a specialty!

Er, but maybe it’s worse at the top, which brings me to a real judge. Well, as real as they come these day’s or so it can appear. The new Victorian Supreme Court Judge Lex Lasry, is a “human rights activist”. Gee, maybe you could read that as the fairly standard list of Left Liberal pet causes? No way man! I'm not wearing no bugging device!

Human rights activist seems a pretty damn selective vocation these days, eh?

Gee, so no? He’s pretty concerned about the millions oppressed, starving, tortured and murdered in North Korea? Er, no. The 300 jails on the 'Economic Fantasy and Real Murder Island of Cuba', that imprisons a larger percentage of the population than Soviet Russia did? No. The Hell of Zimbabwe? No. African cannibal gangster and child soldier Kingdom’s? No. Iran torturing and murdering children, hanging 13 year old girls and executing over 4,000 gay people since 1980? Nope.

Lex Luthor is a champion of the pro head slicing neo-Islamist and venal liar, David Hicks! He cared deeply about the ‘Bali Nine’ who wanted to make some easy money out of importing the delightful drug of heroin. And drug trafficker Van Tuong Nguyen. And last but not least, the half baked hobby terrorist and garden gnome impressionist, Jack Thomas. Yep, all beautiful and worthy cases. Er, why not the actually innocent and factually oppressed? Hmmmm?

Why not help children, women and men who have had God awful lives and are still decent human beings? Perhaps instead of helping unworthy, undeserving people with no real excuse for their toxic grudges, except in their having rotten characters? If Lex can’t find a few million like that, he ain’t really looking.

Apparently Lex baby, made a “frank” speech about being “apolitical”. Er, quite. Maybe it’s a typo, and he actually means ‘a political’….but forgot to finish. Gee, I must look up those two words again, I thought "frank" and "apolitical" meant something entirely different....

Lexy said that lawyers had a “great contribution” in informing public debate. Sure, if you have an enormous amount of money. And if you can understand the deliberately 'lawyered to the indecipherable ninth degree', of any of the impossibly dense wording of the law.

He said he chose to "speak out" as a barrister, so he must have had to speak out pretty loud, cos’ every second and third person where I live in the inner-city, spouts endlessly their dumb support for all of the Judges bog standard ‘causes’ at the drop of a nose ring. He’s not speaking out over silence; he’s shouting the same stuff over the cacophony of the millions of comfortably like-minded.

“Such is the spirit, not the form of the law that keeps justice alive. To me, the proper defence of unpopular causes is about the protection of the rule of law”. Er, in the judge’s circle and the vast majority of Left and Liberal Australia, including much of the media and entertainment industry etc, these causes are extremely popular.

In fact they’re the only kind of causes that such ‘right on’ folks really concern themselves with. Not for these flakes the actual danger of doing something for the millions of truly oppressed and executed for a sick ideology or religion in say Cuba, North Korea, Africa, Saudi Arabia and Iran etc. The judge is known as a passionate opponent against capital punishment. Yep, but not really in the aforementioned places though, eh?

So, here we get to the meat of how impartial the Lex view has been, sports. In the article in 'The Australian' for Thursday November 01 2007, he attacked Howard over his position on terrorism. Surprise! Lex thinks the Government is not taking it seriously enough as the empirical and enormous threat it is? Nope.

So, Lax Lesry thinks the Government should stop calling it a 'War on Terror', as terror is a tactic, but should name the real enemy as it is, which is Islam? Nope. He wants people to understand the empirical fact that it's a war on the insanity and murder based freak religion of Islamism, folks? Wrong again, no. Because they are attacking us as they have for 1300 years and only restricted entirely by the resources at their disposal? No. Lack of resources is a problem Islamist's no longer have. None of that. Lex is angry about how dear Davo Hicksey was so badly treated at Guantanamo, that he put on 20 kilos! Riiight. A real pressing issue that will save us all and stop the daily bombings and beheadings in their tracks. Er, no.

He said he would “commit to an independent, objective approach”. Maybe he will. What do I know? “I certainly won’t be part of any politicised debate that’s not appropriate for a judge to be in”. Like the ones you entered in the previous paragraphs by clearly referring to them I guess. Maybe L.L. will be a simply super judge, but why are so many appointments by the various State Labour Government’s and for years now, been so er, comfortably in line view wise with any downtown radical student march?

It’s not really good enough at all, is it Socrates?

Now stop me if I haven’t got this right, but isn’t a Supreme Court Judge supposed to be one of the highest examples of the best, most objective, empirical, analytical and clear thinking minds in the country, even if symbolically? Why does thinking about what the lower levels of the gradient curve must be, give me little to no confidence and comfort?

So this is apparently the topper-most of the popper-most level of ‘thinking skills’ in our society? Or at least the part that get’s the privileged media platform. Why is so much of it all the bleeding same and simply not damn true? Just like scientists can be effected and warped by the bogus dogma of Global Warming and their own ideology, so can anyone else be so er, touched. It’s a disgrace really. Though I'm sure L.J is Cool. Yep, absolutely certain. No doubts. It's all ok.

Hey, I hope I wasn’t out of line with that crack about Lex Luthor?

Astronomer discovers that most distant stars are made entirely of ‘Star Hubris Illusion Tangents’, or 'shit'.

Since reforming as a band, The Police feel that decadent rock stars are the most ideal role models for the entire planet. "We're not fools", said band leader Sting, pictured here with a revolver.


In a recent swingin' column, Mark Steyn analyses Professor Allan Bloom’s great book from 1987, ‘The Closing of the American Mind’. The basic idea concerns the ubiquitous dominance of what was once considered only Pop Culture, and the fading of any other historical reference points and traditions.

The essentially mediocre aesthetic and limitations of this eternally “present tense", is now considered the only ‘valid’ thing. No one it appears, want's to seem uncool, when in reality, most of us are. Incredibly dominant, its relentless themes and pool of references are now often the only available ‘ideas’ known, learnt or conceived of by many, if not it seems, most people.

There is for many no relevant past, as the future is more comfortably replaced by the next rudimentary and shiny bore in an annoying focus almost completely on the present. Mostly it’s the unsurprising, perfectly manicured, or crude and entirely predictable ersatz rebels who rise to the top, meaning the meaningless of fame and the half way achievement of disproportionate to merit wealth. Yeah, something like that.

Thus the unmoored horde is easily indoctrinated and manipulated with ever more stupid, shallow and ridiculous versions of radical non-ideas that mean essentially zero, because to put them into practice would be insane, but the attempt at the facade continues.

The popular thing is the fraudulent and empty mouthing of “Universal Love” and “sharing the wealth” by people who are at the maximum point of narcissism and greed. People like Linda McCartney who spoke about the G8 countries giving money to Africa, while hiring New York law firms to make sure she paid zero tax to England after living there like a Queen for thirty years. Or ditto, Bono the tax shelter specialist, who keeps all his cash in the Bahamas.

You can go through the entire list of big name celebrities, movie stars, musicians and so on, and it can appear from down here on earth, that perhaps most are full of shit. Now there’s nothing wrong with being rich, but that’s the thing. Our culture is so stuck in a time warp of faux rebellion, that most celebrities it seems, can’t be happy to say they’re just successful entertainers. Nope, they have to maintain a wholly absurd fiction that they’re rebels and profound artists. Most are neither.

Today, that dual achievement is nigh on impossible. The benchmark is now so toxically ‘now’, back dated to months, or maybe slices of a previous decade but without the original motives, context, point or result.

It’s essentially often overtly immature and lacking any real adult possibilities. So narrow and juvenile is our common currency and language, so very sans depth and history, nuanced or otherwise, that stars are now exactly that; bright, distant mass objects feeding off a slowly dying and imploding ball of gas, while mostly reflecting the emptiness all around them, and fading totally from view within the relative terms of the 24 hours that is contemporary fame. There are of course, many older stars that long ago collapsed into a black hole of trite limitations, sucking in ever more fashionable flotsam that passes by.

Witness Madonna, the granite headed business woman and singing aerobics instructor. I had a Chinese girlfriend once, who was sure that Madge's name was not Madonna, but McDonut! You be the judge. Old Mad imports 30,000 birds for her friends to shoot at on her vast property, and then imagines that not only is she a Geopolitical Mastermind and a Global Economics Genius, but a simple and sensitive soul.

And dig this, Maddie thinks she's a Revolutionary! Yep, McDonut is gonna storm the citadels of decadent Manhattan where er, she has a decadent place of residence.

Now why is this so? Hey, didn’t stars used to be mostly well, just stars, consider themselves damn lucky to be so and that’s all they really did, with a bit of charity work on the side? When did being an actor or musician mutate into meaning you have anything to offer beyond those often feeble and amusing roles? Er, now every celebrity thinks they have something to say that simply must be heard when if you removed the shallow, rudimentary, stylised and merely fashionable from their ‘art’, you’d have nothing about anything.

How can anyone fail to notice that the majority of celebs, actors, musicians and self proclaimed artists have virtually and almost invariably, the same opinions by numbers? You know exactly the list of platitudes, heroes and causes they will believe in, well, at least at their level of spouting about it.

While Carlos ‘the Jackass’ Santana will wear a T shirt of his hero, Che ‘the child murderer ‘Guevara, don’t expect him to actually live like the people who have been ‘touched’ by the adopted monster of Cuba. Nope, Carlos knows which side of the ocean his bread is buttered on. And it’s the side with Miami on it.

But there ya go, no matter how far out of their depth, how utterly fake, superficial, essentially inhuman the ‘right on’ and typically mass celebrity non-idea is, no one will even blink, as long as one maintains the correct pose of a ‘for the people’ phony rebel. And today, as it’s been for over forty years, it’s often all pose. Not a lot of it is either real or real good.

The problem is not the lack of context; it’s that today much of what passes for culture is mostly self-referential. The thing itself is the context. So what do you compare anything with? It's as good as....what? The eternal dreams of the teenage narcissist have come to pass with all their simple minded grudges.

“Why can’t we have everything how we want it to be and all the time but only moreso, huh?” It's an eternal teenage rampage!

The saying that “there’s nothing more dated than the latest thing”, is a nice descriptive for today. It fits neatly into the relentlessly shiny, quickly fading and disappointing tedium of the latest incredible achievement of the essentially dull, being expensively shoved in your deeply unsatisfied face.

It’s not that there's anything intrinsically wrong with what’s most often popular; it’s that it's so thinly stretched to the snapping point to what it isn’t and can never be. It can’t even be as popular as it’s alleged to be, because so much is atomised and targeted to a thousand narrow markets, that there’s less and less chance of anything being widely appealing at all. Most acts and celebs despite the hype, have a surprisingly narrow demographic of fans.

The days of almost everyone turning on to the happy, infectious, perfectly crafted and thin cheese of say ABBA are probably over, and thank God for that.

The point is there is no importance in knowing the imagined and actually microscopic musically harmonic differences between any bands in any genre. To the studied mind, the differences are the same as those between various brands of take-away food. The flavour is fleeting, the anticipation is greater than the after taste and the effect either leaves you feeling either somehow unsatisfied or stodgy.

Whenever I attempt to read the mostly unwritten, unreadable non articles of the free music press such as Melbourne’s ‘Beat’ or user pays music and celeb publications, I always play ‘scan through the usual list of touring band tripe and tedium 101’.

“We were so, A. drunk, B. stoned, C. drunk and stoned”, “This is a detailed description of some musical equipment I bought”, “ The bass player is crazy!”, “The record company are bastard’s!”, “The other bands on tour were great!”, “The other bands were bastards and/or crazy!”, "It was really great to meet Iggy and the Stooges!", "It wasn't great to really meet Iggy or the Stooges",“I think I’m going crazy”, “They say I’m crazy!”, “I wish I was crazy!”, “Oh God! I’m soooo crazy!”.

“BushIsHitler”, “Out of Iraq!”, “Give all our wealth, (meaning yours and someone else’s, not theirs) to African Dictators”, “I only eat fruit”, “Be nice to Islamic terrorist’s and they’ll be nice in return. And anyway if they even did exist, and they don’t, they’re freedom fighters against the Bush Fascist Machine!”, or “We should all focus entirely on fantastically imaginary emotive issues now!” etc.

You will invariably find one of these or a combination plus others. This will be drivelled at exactly the same level of childish snoot and turpitude by the relatively unknown local as it is by major stars. They nearly all toot from the same B grade, High School, Undergraduate and comic book inspired script.

The last place you’ll find any depth of discussion regards actual music per se, is in a music publication and from a musician. That happens even less and less in symphonic and jazz focused publications, because everyone is using the same gauge as any other higher, deeper, wider and profound world of reference and compass recedes faster and faster into the hopelessly uncool past, such as last Thursday.

As Steyn writes, every great tradition is reduced to the criteria of dodgy ideas of the "authentic", having "energy" and being "angry" about well, insert whatever.

Now as for myself, I’m not nearly as interested as I'm supposed to be in what is laughingly called the ‘classic’ as opposed to classical music of my younger years. I feel that a lot of it was so ‘good’, that I never want to hear any of it again. Instead, I found music that I was totally unaware of. Me and every other clueless and callow chart consumer I knew. In short, the music I grew up with and liked, was mostly crap.

The stuff I do remember fondly was either novelty songs like 'Puff the Magic Dragon' or the first simulated synthesizer instrumental 'Telstar', pop shmaltz like 'Strangers in Paradise' or 'classic's from the Great American Song Book, like 'Witchcraft' and 'Night and Day'. But who cares? Aah, it's all shot to Hell, I tell ya! But it was the context and the collected random memory of it. Especially to the typical kind of guy like me, who knows a lot of useless, arcane and kinda embarrassing to admit to for some, stuff.

It was always so really, mostly. But the difference is, then it wasn’t often considered that it had to be anything else, than what it actually was. It was just for enjoyment, something to listen, dance and have sex to. Sometimes you even talked about it, but not for too long. I rarely managed the sex part but I talked about it, a lot.

So much of today’s soundtrack is supposed to mean something of urgent, insightful and (dreary) political import precisely as its inversion is happening, rather inexorably. Music incapable of meaning as music, presents rhetorical death and assembled by the numbers junk and bunk as the message. The medium is message burdened, and the message is pure cant. It's like listening to a lyric about diarrhoea merely because that's "keepin' it real".

To repeatedly state an attitude and position that has nothing to do with the rational, and is the entire opposite of any of your actual behaviour is the definition of insane.

And that’s where we find ourselves. We’re rootless and trapped because every subject has been defined to the only singular way of expressing it. Pick any subject, and you know the approved Left infected actor, celebrity and musician cliché way of presenting it.

So there’s Sting, singing “We can’t live here and be happy with less, with so many riches, so many souls, everything we see that we want to possess”. Yeah, right. So his ‘lyrical’ cliché is that wealth is a pizza. If I have more slices, you have less. The idea of making a pizza factory doesn’t seem to occur in 'Tunesmith Toon Town'.

Yes, the long since rhetorically leaden lyric wise Sting, and his Zeppelin sized ego plus consumption, prats on endlessly about reducing his ‘carbon footprint’, a meaningless and perfect phrase for any slinger of empty platitudes. He has four huge houses in Britain alone, one of 320ha, with 14 bedrooms and eight baths. He also has a beach house in Malibu and a 240ha estate in Tuscany. Yeah, all us plebes are eager to follow your outstanding example, Stinky old chum. Hell no! We won't go!

In 2007, his cook Jane Martin took Stingy to court which awarded her $58,000 for “shameful” dismissal.

She spoke of Stings Caligula-like lifestyle where there is “no regard to expense, cost or wastage where food and drink were concerned”. Right on, oh humble 'Saviour of the World'. She regularly had to make expensive journey’s just to make soup for Mr and Mrs Gandhi, when they already had two housekeepers, two nannies and a butler at their humble lodgings and bloated 'Pop Star Madhouse'.

But yep, it’s all wild contradiction. Hell, contradiction sounds better than hypocrite or plain nuts. Sting is apparently a green enviro guy and sells limos....Why not, eh? Yet the same Sting gives a lot of money to charity, and definitely more than me. A few years ago, he didn’t even notice that an accountant had stolen $14,000,000 from him.

Sting has six children. I guess that’s why in 1981 he said the following. A classic piece of Left Liberal, glib and nihilist anti-human guff. This baloney is now a standard and core canard of any current ‘Enviro-Freak’s Manifesto’. Sting was before his time!

“I just don’t agree with procreation any more. (Thus I get to just fuck everyone.) If we carry on thinking like that, we’re doomed. (Er, so breeding ourselves to extinction we won’t be um, doomed? Whose gonna buy your singles?)

We have too many people. (Too many of you, just enough of Sting. Suicide, Sting?)

We’re not the most important thing on the planet. (Yep, decadent and narcissistic rock stars never think or act selfishly. No, please, do go on.) And until we realise that, we’re in deep shit”. Gee, mate, that’s some deep shit. Um, when you say the Royal “we”, I take it to mean everyone else, right? Fantastic.

And there’s the rub. Yep, these are relatively old acts in the shallow pool of pop, but today’s stars have identical views only even more stylised. These folks are all trying to project a farrago of ridiculous and inherently contradictory, ‘right on’ images and failing utterly at any capacity for self awareness or reflection whatsoever. It’s all a mad act, but often more breathtakingly amusing and entertaining than most of their collective product. Some product.



Sources: Mark Steyn at New Criterion dot com. http://newcriterion.com:81/archives/26/11/twenty-years-ago-today/

Christopher Sanford at ‘The Herald Sun’, Sunday September 23 2007.

How to stop Muslim Islamist Homicide-Suicide bombers dead or alive.

The earliest example of Islamic scholars actually writing down the Krazy Koran dates from about 1203. Here is a very early photograph of the great Muslim historian Mohammad Mohammed Cyril Bin Cheater, putting down for posterity, the posterior of Islam. He's using a 'Little Dhimmi Killer' typewriter and was photographed using a 'Mecca 700' camera. Both of course were invented by Mohammad, the greatest man of all time...in some kind of alternate or parallel universe, that is.



"That ain't workin', this is how ya do it, this is how ya do it and get ya chic's for free". Apparently about 72 and all virgin's. Riight.


First you make the following, 'State Policy', follow it to the letter and show proof that you have indeed done so. After any Muslim Islamist has spread the beautiful message of peace that is Mad Mohammad, the filth of Islam and the Krazy Koran by blowing themselves up, hideously maiming and murdering as many people of ALL races, religions and types as possible, ruining societies and thousands of lives much as they have in their own neighbourhoods, or ‘Gods Monkey House’, this my friends, is what you do. And simple is best, like a perfected, clear block and punch to the head.

Gather up all the pieces of the ‘Deluded Ones’, check the DNA and so on to identify them etc, which they always do, and then simply feed all terrorist body parts to pigs.

Now, even the most insane of Islamist freaks will not like the idea of spending the next few years as part of a pork and ham machine’s molecular structure. Of course, a certain amount ends up as crap, but I feel bombers can’t be chooser’s. Hey, dig the auto responses!

“Eek! That’s monstrous!” Hey, stop the bombing then.

Now sports, I don’t care what happens to the kind of committed and committable freaks who are comfortable, gleeful, nay, orgasmic and exultant at the idea of for example, blasting twenty seven Iraqi children while these kids were getting candy from US marines in 2006. Then a second monster blew himself up as people came running to help! Or the garbage that detonated a car among one hundred lunching Iraqi schoolgirls, then rammed a second waiting car bomb into the fleeing chaos of the terrorfied and hideously mauled school children.

These are only two of the over 9,000 known global Islamic terror attacks since 9/11.

I seek no refuge in the nauseating and common currency of moral relativism, chums. Don’t need it. I look into Islam and see an Abyss, nothing more. The factory output of “if’s, but’s, because and maybe's”, are all wholly unconvincing. I find Islam unconvincingly Holy or is it convincingly unholy?

I find Islam plain seeks out many people just to oppress and kill them. I find Islam is even unbelievably worse than the polished turd of Communism. There is not even the absurd fantasy economics, dumb non-achievements or inverted freedom through absolute conformity. The reality of Islamism is entirely a mad dream with no redeeming features whatsoever. The whole of Islam is in the clouds and securely death based. This world has no value whatsoever to them beyond a battle ground for Dar Islam.

And of course, this world is the Koranic Ticket Master outlet for a trip to Muslim Pervert Heaven, loaded with virgins and more often than not, meaning boy and girl children, booze, drugs and the rest of the enormously hypocritical and disgusting debauchery promised by Mo the Hammered. Er, gee, all the things that Muslim’s strictly prohibit and denounce in relentless, rabid ranting here on earth. Riiight.

Islam is a terminal contradiction.

The message is clear, sports. It is entirely and utterly, diversionary, disingenuous, lazy and un-researched to say this is not Islam simply because it’s a big, bad, ugly and frightening negative. This absolutely is the truth of Islam, the lovely ‘truth’ we’ve all come to enjoy. Yep, there are millions of very nice and decent Muslims in the world, though not a lot protesting against Islamist terror it seems….but never mind. I believe you are a ‘moderate’ Muslim in direct proportion to how little you have fully embraced the faith of Islam.

Ok, now moderate means “without ideology and willing to compromise”. Gee, now there’s an embarrassing problem right there. No true Muslim is willing to compromise their beliefs and especially once they get power. And definitely not like the self-imploding and self-abasing Dhimmi’s of the West, who believe utterly in every religion and culture but their own. Islam is not a fluffy try on that ya just pick up and then breezily decide otherwise.

“Um, er, Islam's not really for me anymore. I can’t stand the blood and screaming”.

There is one branch of God in Islamic societies, and that’s Islam and they kill you for allowing your subscription to slip. Sure, you can criticize Islam in ‘God’s Monkey House’, fine. Knock yourself out. But then they kill you.

Yep, there are ‘moderate’ Muslims. They usually live under enormous pressure,they’re tortured, murdered, exiled if they're lucky, they've either left Islam or are about to, they've quite commonly become Christian, Buddhist or atheist etc, or they now live entirely in the West, often in hiding.

The first people targeted for assassination by Islamist's are ‘moderate’ Muslims, and don’t you ever forget it.

Aye, there’s the rub. If the Krazy Koran came straight from Allah, old Allah really needs a short course in creative writing. Maybe I’ll send God an Adult Education pamphlet.

The weak-minded and spineless brim with auto denial; all in the face of a massive Himalaya of relentless, daily, historical and present empirical evidence to the contrary. But instant subject change is the way of those infected with the virus of PC Leftism and Islamist apologia. It’s an automatic for a very good reason.

If such dupes and dhimmi’s accept that Islamism is a real and present danger and means everything it says, which it does and is always backed up with action, well, the same fools and frauds would have to start admitting to a lot of their own lies, delusions, monstrous mistakes, support for evil and their mad political posturing. Thus, the whole facade of Left junk would unravel pretty damn quickly.

Aah, the eternal Student Union crisis meeting and Hall of Mirrors that is the Left of today. If ever a shrivelled shrub needed whacking, that would be it. Now beyond the raw material of pure radical gold it invariably supplies, I don't care how any of the mediocrities of the Left may respond, if they do at all. I don’t need to concern myself with being startled by any sudden bright lights of maturity and adulthood that may arise unexpectedly, out of the rhetorical gloom. Won’t happen sports.

Now, it’s exactly the same with the freakoid sadists and perverts of Islamism or Islam for that matter. I’m growing tired of making the ‘Slim and Shady’ differentiation between Islam and Islamism. There ain’t one really, unless you find nuance of note between Nazi and Nazism, Communist and Communism or rape and rapine. It’s merely a matter of study and commitment to the very intensely proscribed doctrines of er, Islam. Islam? No, it’s a' beef!

Many of these outpatients of the intellect, sans balance, are intensely passionate in order to avoid seeing the causes of their own ignorance, which are usually and clearly all around them. Islam is not beyond criticism at all, it’s capable only of being criticised. It’s never a comfortable fit because everything about it is problematic, especially when it is placed in the middle and context of the entirely normalised. It’s like the proverbial turd in the swimming pool. Islam is the thing that should be criticised. It’s a religion, bub!

In the West, we’re still almost allowed to criticize religion, so bad luck for you if you don’t like it. Or is that only Christianity that's allowed to be dumped on? And that’s the thing sports; all the rad young twerps that glibly say absolutely anything about Christianity are mostly completely silent on Islam. Except of course, for inverted apologia. This is no matter what daily abominations or atrocities Islam excels at. There’s always a ready cliche of denial ready. And you also have the embarrassing posturing that it’s apparently somehow risky to criticise Christianity and they are dig this, daring rebels! What a fraud! Vale faux rebels… Get ya fake dissident credentials elsewhere, ya creeps.

Er, yeah. Everyone lives in fear of the Salvation Army, the Catholic Church, Anglicans and those two old ladies, the pimply youth and the fat guy from the Seventh Day Adventists.

“Now deary, I heard you say that Jesus was a bum and the church stunk, so if you still come to our Thursday night Mechanics Hall meeting, there’s no fruit cake for you!”

Yes, Dave Allen lives in terror to this day, of hearing a chocolate biscuit eating pensioner's withered and liver spotted knuckles rapping feebly on his door. Er, no.

The Left is in the freakish, but not that new a position of defending the indefensible, of tolerating the intolerant, of pretending the inhuman is human. Much as they did with Soviet Mass Murder and Nazism even before the Hitler Stalin Pact, Red China purges and the Cultural Revolution, Fidel and Che murder sprees and sympathy for the Devil of North Korea etc. These classics in the hideous and twisted diaries of the Left, Communism and Socialism, are not the complete or even the end of the story.

These events plus millions more horrible, sad and anonymous episodes are what eagerly annihilated over one hundred million people. In the remaining Communist and Socialist Hellholes around the world, this is happening right now in fact.

No wonder the Left and Islamism are such comfortable bedfellows.

How many lives has Islam destroyed, oppressed, perverted, tortured, murdered and vampired? After 1300 years, who knows? What has it achieved that it didn’t steal or usurp from the productive and creative? Nothing. It’s all the longest lie and cover up in history after Communism and Leftism. Islam and the basket case concentration camp states that support it, have an exciting and apocalyptic plan for the future, and we’re all invited whether we want to be or not. You will be shocked to see how quickly the Police and civilian services are overwhelmed and reduced to protecting themselves and their families, just like in France, Belgium and the UK etc.

So do bring a gift, perhaps a little something self-loading and automatic? Or maybe a tasteful array of Claymore mines, or even a ‘Little Roaster Flamethrower?' I know I will if I can, but it’s unlikely in the now largely Unarmed States of Australia.




Here is a wonderful post from Bob at onecosmos blogspot. It's excellent. Dig.


Wednesday, September 26, 2007.

Islamists and Leftists have a "logic" that serves their needs, not truth.With projection and denial prominent.


In the unconscious mind, where symmetrical logic rules the night, the stronger the emotion one is feeling, the more "symmetrical deductions" are likely to occur. For example, as Bomford writes, on a deep unconscious level, "one who hates has to believe that his or her hatred is returned".

Note that this is a logical operation, only based upon a different sort of logic. This logic is no doubt the source of the psychotic fear of Israel in the Islamic world. Their unconscious hatred is so profound that it simultaneously reverses the relation, so that they can't help perceiving that Israel hates them. But Israelis just want to shop, raise their families, or read the Torah. They couldn't care less about Muslims, except to the extent that bloodthirsty Muslim barbarians harbor murderous rage toward them.

It's fine to hate evil, but in the Islamic world, what is hated is transformed into evil. Something is not hated because it is evil, but evil because it is hated. One could say the same of the left, which habitually fears what it eternally hates. The left cannot be comprehended unless one appreciates the extent of their unbound hatred. Once this is grasped, what seems illogical is suddenly seen to obey the dictates of symmetrical logic.

For example, the unconscious feeling that I hate America and want us to lose in Iraq is transformed to General Petraeus is a traitor, or I am a racist becomes America is racist, or I am unbearably envious becomes the wealthy are engaged in class warfare against me!

Another characteristic of the unconscious is that it is timeless, in the sense that it can reverse temporal relations. For example, in the unconscious mind, if A is the cause of B, B can also be the cause of A. Thus, "before" and "after" become meaningless. Therefore, although we were inexcusably attacked by Islamists on 9-11, within minutes, leftists were saying that the real reason for the attack was that we had done something to offend Muslims.

Likewise, throughout the Cold War, leftist scholars wrote "revisionist" histories, in which the United States was the cause of the Cold War, or at least equally responsible for it. You will notice that there are no conservative revisionists who write, for example, that blacks were the cause of their own lynching, or that Japanese Americans were the cause of their own internment. You can only think in this manner if you are pathologically under the sway of unconscious symmetrical logic.

Also in the unconscious mind, there is no distinction between the memory of something that actually occurred vs. the memory of a fantasy. Here we can understand how and why the left is so prone to mythologizing the past, as their fantasies are mingled with reality. Thus, no amount of reality and asymmetrical logic will ever convince them that FDR made the Great Depression worse, not better, or that the black family only began to disintegrate after the imposition of all the "Great Society" programs of the mid to late '60s.

No amount of logic could convince a leftist that his policies harm the "little guy," since his ruling myth, in the face of all evidence to the contrary, is that he is here to rescue the hapless little guy (for whom the leftist always feels rich contempt in the unconscious mind, contempt which only seeps out everywhere).

One thing you will notice about the left is that they are passionate. Because the left is guided by feelings and intentions, they are blind to the results of their actions. If their feelings are infinitely good, then in the unconscious mind, the results must also be infinitely good.

As I have written before, this is a religious passion in the absence of religion, so it has no traditional means to structure and channel it. Just as religion partakes of symmetrical logic in an adaptive way (i.e., the meek shall inherit the earth, the Golden Rule, humans are made in the image of the Creator, etc.), leftists do so in a terribly unhealthy way.

That is, because of the intensity of their feelings, these feelings reach way down into the symmetrical realm, with no way to structure or make sense of them. This is why you always see so much highly charged, "unfiltered" unconscious material coming out of the left. To borrow a metaphor from someone, reading dailykos or huffington post is like taking a ride through a sewer in a glass bottom boat.

http://onecosmos.blogspot.com/2007/09/patterned-irrationality-of-left.html

Saigon Police Chief mean to VC mass murderer for no good reason.

Excuse me, but I see you have some dandruff on your collar. Here, let me blow it away.


"War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself". John Stuart Mill.



Great and true quote, but what the Hell do I know? I'm just a guitar player. How many journalists does it take to research a photograph? Apparently an infinite number of ‘Press Professionals’ has the same effect as zero. Now how many of you know the photo above? Most everyone I’d say, except for the sadly and clueless victim of their own inertia and the Main Stream Media or MSM. After countless reproductions of this image, with it hanging around like an eternal Twilight Zone split second, almost nobody knows the story behind it at all.

The man was Nguyen Van Leu, a Viet Cong or ‘VC’ killer who had just chopped and diced an entire family in the kitchen of their home. A Mother, a Father and children were sliced open with a machete by this guy. The Father was a Police Major and close friend of the man who executed Van Leu, Brigadier General and Saigon Police Chief Nguyen Ngoc Loan. A tough old bird who was badly wounded in the last weeks of the war and ended his days in America. The VC was found standing guard over a pit filled with bound, gagged, slashed, mutilated, tortured and shot people.

Gee, much of South Vietnam and whole sections of Saigon under attack by multiple battalions of vicious demons all eagerly committing as many murderous acts as possible, is no reason to get upset, Chief. Um, pass me the pistol and I’ll do it. Hey! My Grandmother would be chomping at the bit to let off a few rounds, if she could push to the front of the line.

Sadly for Van Leu, he was out of line with that crack about chopping up the family, Chief.

It all demonstrates how the third rate press in Saigon, the one that occasionally found the energy to leave the bars of the Caravelle and Continental Hotels, was indeed the prototype for today’s close to useless MSM. There were around 700 journalists in Vietnam. Virtually none bothered to find out either the background, the circumstances behind it or to do any follow up of this happy snap even after it became so well known, and eventually seen as one of the two pivotal images of the war in Vietnam. The other being the awful 'naked running napalmed girl'.

The first time I found actual background info on this proto photo, pre-Internet, was reading a great book on the Vietnam conflict by the groovy photo journalist, Tim Page. Look him up folks. He’s very, very cool and on the money or scrip as the case may be.

Do you know what the biggest and real atrocity of the Tet Offensive was? The murder of over 2,000 people, Catholics, Buddhists and others during 'The Siege of the Walled Citadel' in Hue by the Viet Cong. The bodies were stacked like wood. Beyond the battle itself, this mass murder went largely unreported and there were no catchy pictures.

What does it all tell you about today? That now it’s even worse! They’ve perfected it. There are regularly few to zero journalistic standards applied in the MSM. Its common currency is often ideology, mediocrity, agenda, the fake and the entirely predictable.

In 1968 the media merely pandered to the public’s shifting mood, kinda like The Beatles did, being in reality just in time or a little after the fact. The great Beatles often refined, packaged and just did it better than everyone else. Today, the MSM is so bad and pervasive, that the only ‘everyone else’ apart from the impotent, frustrated and enraged members of the public who manage to see through the general media fraud, is the Internet. Each day I get down on my knees and thank Tim Berners-Lee for 'The Net'.

Today, the MSM don’t just pander, they blatantly manipulate, obfuscate, blur, bias, lie and sin by relentless omission, warping the focus of the public, reinforcing delusions and playing to distractions. The media today is not really your friend but more often a kind of enemy, to both thinking skills and a clear understanding of almost everything.

Yep, the Tet Offensive was a huge failure for the North on every count except one. Much of the VC that took part in the “uprising” that virtually no one joined, were killed by US, South Vietnamese, Australian and Allied troops, local militias, the people of Saigon and throughout the South. And that’s the only part of the Communist North’s plan that worked out. The incompetent in Western Governments, military, press and Left radicals did the rest.

The North wanted to eliminate the VC to consolidate their own power. That’s the classic infighting, murderous rivalry and implosion of Communism, folks. They only change through murder, plot, lies, and inertia, outside pressures or collapse. Thirty five battalions of VC attacking hundred of targets simultaneously, all ending with most VC killed or captured. Not one objective achieved. Some Communist success. What would be failure? The VC dying twice?

The VC captured the National Radio station to broadcast the signal to “general uprising” but the power was out. And there was no uprising. Gee, imagine if you staged a rebellion and nobody came? Nope, most people in the South felt about a Communist future the same way as most sane people do with a working economy and some semblance of government, no matter how corrupt. They don’t want it. People get that way with folks who cut off the heads of village elders and school teachers and leave them on pikes. They probably weren't too crazy about the napalm, either. The Vietnamese people sometimes got it from several sides at once.

Yep, the war was often a hideous drag, but not as much as the ‘peace’ was, virtually all unreported, undocumented and anonymous. Thus the biggest movement of refugees in history was of the Vietnamese after the fall of Saigon. Almost three million escaping, with around one million dying in the South China Sea.

During the war, you were free to leave or emigrate, but not a lot did. Though there was a continuous flow of refugees from North to South and not the other way. Now the Vietnamese love their country too. I have Vietnamese friends, often professionals in old Vietnam, who speak of how the local economy was similar to Victoria's at the time. And how a lot of life in Saigon was like anywhere else in Asia for good and bad. With Islamist bombings, murder's and intimidation spreading almost everywhere in South East Asia, it may even bring on a feeling of nostalgic nausea.




Why was the war lost? Because the Vietnamese people were not always represented in any medium clearly and fully, and neither were the often very professional arms of their military. Because the US and South Vietnamese military were not allowed to destroy the enemy supply lines feeding the insurgency, nor damage or seriously pressure enemy bases. Because while the US military blundered less than they succeeded, they were serious and ever present flaws, including deliberately reckless, stupid and rotten policy.

The reasons for being in Vietnam happened slowly, inexorably, and were essentially strategic and noble, however they played out.

The military and government were not always honest and clear when they should have been and were foolishly open when totally inappropriate. This is an inversion of how to win a war.

Other reasons were that after the main US withdrawal, the supply of material and support was cut off to the South and the US public were not informed clearly and honestly of what was at stake. Because the South Vietnamese Government were often stupid, corrupt and myopic. Because the Vietnamese were often seen as being so different and Asian, that it was hard for many to conceive that they may desire the same things as us; security, economic , financial and political freedom.

Because after a while nothing good was deemed news worthy, nothing was worth getting in perspective and right, no amount of infrastructure, purpose, professionalism, social progress and services and so on, registered out of the relentless gloom of the war that just seemed to ‘drag on and on’.

And because the press fell into a group dynamic of “aloof, detached and uninvolved”, as Paul Ham has said in his new book ‘Vietnam the Australian War’.

Aah, the Aussie soldier was mostly professional, well liked, and successful and on return to Australia, treated badly to put it mildly, by the military, the peace crowd, the government and especially the press.

As Paul Hamm writes, “the Australian digger’s contempt for the Saigon press corp deepened. In 1968, the soldiers were scathing about the quality of media coverage of the war. Journalists would return from operations and file stories that bore no resemblance to the soldier’s recollections of events”. What’s changed?

As the architect of much of the Communist victory General Giap has stated, the North was ready to negotiate after Tet. They were at that point, a drastically reduced and utter shambles, but after they saw that many people, especially like John Kerry with his Left driven extrema, lies and propaganda, were showing clearly that they were going to help the North win again, Giap said “We changed our mind”.

So, all the Communist North needed was five years to consolidate and renew, which they were astonishingly handed by the victors of Tet! Then the North would be ready again to press home their final assault.

Aah, the weakness of the sometimes easily manipulated focus of the public mind. It’s a sad thing that most people’s images of Vietnam come from Hollywood movies. Some mildly entertaining fodder, but absolutely nothing to do with the reality of the war. In short, Hollywood’s version of “in country” was and is, invariably crap. Notice how these films are never really about the Vietnamese people? The Vietnamese end up as extras in their own tragedy. That’s because movie people, like most old middle class hippies from the 1970’s and 1980’s never gave a damn about the Vietnamese.

Once Saigon fell, no one cared at all cos’ they didn’t have to worry about maybe going. How many hippie protesters who ‘cared’ so much went to Vietnam after 1975 just to ‘help out?’ Er, zero. Gee, but wasn’t the whole premise of the anti-war movement that it was gonna be so much better after the US and it’s allies left and the Communist Party liberated the people of Vietnam? Well, yes or no? All convenient lies.

Any profoundly bankrupt movement like the allegedly anti-war Left crowd, that can comfortably ignore the endless flow of millions of refugees from the “hard won” hippie success of defeat in Vietnam and the subsequent Communist dictatorship, deserves nothing but utter contempt and ridicule. I think it was a guy from the Indoctrinate U group who asked Hanoi Jane Fonda, how does she feel about the millions who have fled Vietnam and is she concerned that her serial attitude in pushing for the same tactic in Iraq, could have the same or worse effect? Er, gee, a real poser.

The peculiarly arrogant and neurotically self-loathing Fonda just brushed it off. Well, one can when one has a Bel Air mansion, pool and millions of dollars in the bank and lives smugly in the secure, free and affluent best parts of the West. Again, what’s changed? The same back slappin’ Hollywood freaks and celebrities centre stage, even Baghdad Jane.

Now what were the true goals of the Communist North? To install a Totalitarian Dictatorship that controls every aspect of the life. Which is exactly what they immediately did. It was not to "liberate" the people.

"Gee, we think the people don't have enough opportunity to express themselves, do business, earn an independent living, see the world and have a few laughs". Er, no.

This is what the anti-war movement in the end were proposing, supporting and even championed and aided. All defining of treason. That Jane Fonda was never charged, shows entirely the naive and confused weakness of, as student activists called it in self loathing hyper drive, the "US Fascist State" etc.

The majority of the anti war protesters NEVER really cared about Vietnam or the Vietnamese at all and the way they cloaked it in 'caring' is sickening. Fair enough to say you don't want to go, or for your friends and family etc, but why pretend you give a damn, when clearly you don't?

Many activists were indeed rabidly eager to say they utterly supported the tyrannical Communist North out right, wearing Communist paraphernalia and spouting and distributing its junk and propaganda. This NEVER translated into leaving Capitalist Democracy's and moving to live entirely in North Vietnam. All clearly treasonable and all ending in the majority of them eventually having very successful and middle-class lives.

In 1975, the "Liberator's" of South Vietnam wasted no time being well, Communist's, and instantly began arresting, harassing, interrogating, re-educating, torturing, executing and totally controlling millions. For example, they corralled police and military into buildings and set the places on fire. In one incident, about 500 were burned alive. They systematically destroyed, beggared and bankrupted a naturally productive, innovative and independently proud people with the idiotic and wholly foreign ideologies of Communism and Socialism.

The Communist "Victory" was such an abject economic failure, that in the 1980's when officials at one branch of the local government met foreign VIP's, they had to literally take turns wearing the one available and shabby suit! This in a country ideal for textile production and once bursting with cut price tailors. Aah, but Saigon's version of Yves Saint Laurent was out in the field's shovelling mud. Makes perfect sense, yes? Er, no.

Er, maybe that's the why the million's who could, escaped. Not by plane or ship, but by crappy old boats and rafts. Because the first thing Communist Regimes always do, to create a "Workers Paradise", is to stop everyone leaving. Except Jane Fonda. She was always welcome to come and go. Oh, yes, the press were free and easy as long as they said nice things, especially about Ho Chi Minh, and they usually did.

Yes, the war was never perfect, but for the anti-war crowd the defeat was. Because now they could just completely forget about it, while still having a handy ad nauseum cipher for the future and an endless source of self-congratulating, conceited and wholly undeserved pride. And all while ignoring any present reality of the Vietnamese people.


Walter Cronkite was often all style over substance, lost in his own reflective and oddly staccato grand eloquent baloney. He was both professional and mediocre, shallow and unresearched and wrong about almost everything that he couldn't or wouldn't comprehend. But all presented so effectively.

Much of the reporting on Vietnam was seemingly by the side burned faux swingers of the time, grooving with an imagined international hipness via teletext machine.

“This just in from our bureau Chief in Saigon, Roger Safari suit”.

Some were good, some were even great, such as Michael Herr who wrote ‘Dispatches’. In many less pleasant parts of the world, the places where movie stars don’t live, being a journalist with standards is life threatening. In the end, if victory is not pressed relentlessly as it was by the North, defeat simply steps into the spaces left open by our own decadence.