Tuesday, 17 June 2008
God save Dave Allen.
The Ayatollah Khomeini, AKA one of the greatest perverts and freaks in history, blows snot from his nose, in the form of the head murderer of 4,000 Iranian Muslim homosexuals, the Prez of Iran, Armachimphead.
"An Islamic regime must be serious in every field. There are no jokes in Islam. There is no humour in Islam. There is no fun in Islam." Ayatollah Khomeini.
More from the true face of King Chuckles:
“Islam makes it incumbent on all adult males, provided they are not disabled and incapacitated, to prepare themselves for the conquest of [other] countries so that the writ of Islam is obeyed in every country in the world. But those who study Islamic Holy War will understand why Islam wants to conquer the whole world.
What is the good of us asking for the hand of a thief to be severed or an adulteress to be stoned to death when all we can do is recommend such punishments, having no power to implement them?
Those who know nothing of Islam pretend that Islam counsels against war. Those are witless. Islam says kill all the unbelievers just as they would kill you all! Does this mean that Muslims should sit back until they are devoured by [the unbelievers] Islam says Kill them, put them to the sword and scatter [their armies].
Does this mean sitting back until they overcome us? Islam says kill in the service of Allah those who may want to kill you! Does this mean that we should surrender to the enemy?
Islam says whatever good there is exists thanks to the sword and in the shadow of the sword! People cannot be made obedient except with the sword! The sword is the key to Paradise, which can be opened only for Holy Warriors!
There are hundreds of other [Koranic] verses and Hadith's [sayings of the Prophet] urging Muslims to value war and to fight. Does all that mean that Islam is a religion that prevents men from waging war I spit upon those foolish souls who make such a claim.” Ayatollah Khomeini.
Ah, a delightful quote by the Ayatollah Khomeini, who not only was a Muslim, but was and is considered one of the greatest of Islamic spiritual leaders, and an enormous inspiration by millions and millions of Muslims throughout the Middle-East, and worldwide. You can find his poster most anywhere, along with Osama Bin Laden, Carlos the Jackal, Sheik Yasini, Che the child killer Guevara and Claude Van Damme.
Hey, I know why Dave Allen, Peter Cook and Dudley Moore, Monty Python, the Chaser team, The Goons, Spitting Image, Benny Hill and a thousand other great comedians were never arrested or prosecuted by the government! Because most of them made fun of most every religion a long time ago, and apart from a few odd bits, they made virtually little to zero fun of Islam. That’s if you call every religion mostly in practice, Christianity... And being a Christian, Christianity is funny.
Some of the older acts probably would have had a go at the Islamist version of Murder Incorporated, but the religion of peace wasn’t in the er, news then.
Australia, just like the neo-Socialist dystopia of dhimmi Canada, introduced very similar laws in 2001 to give unprecedented protection from any objective and empirical scrutiny whatsoever to religion. Religion is to the faithless, merely ideology and therefore is nothing more than an unproven and unprovable idea, no better, sacred or special than any other idea.
The Racial and Religious Vilification Law. "...person must not, on the ground of the religious belief or activity of another person or class of persons, engage in conduct that incites hatred against, serious contempt for, or revulsion or severe ridicule of, that other person or class of persons”.
Terrifying is it not? And from our own government. God help us all. Perhaps they mean something like this?
"A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age, even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man, however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine, other sexual act such as foreplay, rubbing, kissing and sodomy is allowed." Ayatollah Khomeini.
Certainly fills me with revulsion and contempt.
The abuse of children and women it appears, is intrinsic to Islamism and cannot be separated really. And the only way to save millions of ordinary children, women and men who happen to be ordinary Muslim people, and those who happen to not be, is to face the reality of what it is that's oppressing, torturing and murdering people by the millions, eh? And for so long. That's if those who profess to care with the force of the law, really er, do. I dunno, I feel somehow...unconvinced.
Hey, maybe this one float’s their boat?
"We do not worship Iran, we worship Allah. For patriotism is another name for paganism. I say let this land [Iran] burn. I say let this land go up in smoke, provided Islam emerges triumphant in the rest of the world." Ayatollah Khomeini.
Ok, I respect your right to express an alternative lifestyle choice, even if it involves me dying! Wah hey! Hmmm, the Racial Vilification Law appears to have much in common with Islamic law, just minus the torture and murder.
"The author of the Satanic Verses book, which is against Islam, the Prophet and the Koran, and all those involved in its publication who were aware of its content, are sentenced to death. I ask all Moslems to execute them wherever they find them." Ayatollah Khomeini.
Here's a real knee slapper.
“If one commits the act of sodomy with a cow, an ewe, or a camel, their urine and their excrements become impure, and even their milk may no longer be consumed. The animal must then be killed and as quickly as possible and burned.” Ayatollah Khomeini.
Hey, stop laughing. This is serious!
"This regime occupying Jerusalem, [Er, Israel.] must vanish from the page of time." Ayatollah Khomeini.
"If one permits an infidel to continue in his role as a corrupter of the earth, his moral suffering will be all the worse. If one kills the infidel, and this stops him from perpetrating his misdeeds, his death will be a blessing to him." Ayatollah Khomeini.
Here’s my favourite.
"Yes, we are reactionaries, and you are enlightened intellectuals: You intellectuals do not want us to go back 1400 years. You, who want freedom, freedom for everything, the freedom of parties, you who want all the freedoms, you intellectuals: freedom that will corrupt our youth, freedom that will pave the way for the oppressor, freedom that will drag our nation to the bottom." Ayatollah Khomeini.
While I naturally don’t agree with everything he says, the superior intellect of the great Christopher Hitchen’s appears in his incredible book, ‘God Is Not Great’, almost entirely right. Right in how religion is often easily made rotten, mean, dangerous, stunting, stupefying and oppressive to people, and usually deserving of no special rights. Such a path of exclusivity almost inevitably leads to despotism, the reduction or elimination of freedom and the imposition of evil. The prime difference is that the core of Christianity is the good in humanity, while the core of Islamism is a terrifying evil.
Now dig. I’m a Christian with Catholic parents. No, really. It’s was a natural part of our life and everyone we knew, to seriously ridicule our own beliefs. Thus we loved Dave Allen. This is the normal and secular world, at least it was. I don’t need or want Christianity to be bizarrely off limits to humour, satire or even the harshest criticism. If it's worth a damn, and it is, it can take it. It's when the state works either for or against religion that I get spooked. The fact is there are many disgusting elements and events in the past and contemporary history of Christianity.
How should one view child sexual abuse and the worshipping of a man flayed alive on a torture and execution device as a symbol of er, love and peace, but as problematically horrible?From a purely design standpoint, lucky Jesus wasn’t guillotined, shot or electrocuted.
Peter Cook and Dudley Moore used to do a routine that Jesus was maybe only holy from the waist up, so that he could go to the “...Kharzy, have a slash and a fucking good wank”. Now I value and believe in Christ, but that’s funny.
And yet the profound teachings and meaning of Christ can kick every other ass. No, really. Thus the Western Canon, the bedrock of which is Judeo Christianity, is so free, successful, prosperous and triumphant. I know that offends the average Leftard, but er, that's because they "...live in a fantasy life completely supported by the system they despise". Mark Steyn.
Without our Christian heritage, we would have nothing. Seems unlikely to many, I know, but that's because many have been indoctrinated in a deluded bias against their own roots. Read up on it. Ah the great glory and the fall from grace. The triumph of Judeo Christianity with all its flaws, meant the eventual tiumph of civilisation. Thus the "crooked boards of humanity" made a nice fit, dig?
And I'm a naturally enthusiastic fan of humour without the random limits of er, dubious "taste", because sports, sometimes all the weight of life, religion and er, meaning etc, sometimes just becomes a tedious freaking bore and drag. We are after all, actual human beings, not amateur saints and seek relief in human ways, dig? But our sometimes idiot politicians think our natural thoughts and emotions should be controlled and open to punitive er, adjustment and re-education.
Here’s my Fisking of the whole irrational and logical fallacy laden trope. Ok. What the government is forcing us to do through their state power is to merely accept their assumptions. The assumption being that we don’t need to learn anything in depth about any religion really. Nope, the government can and will do that for us. Just accept it at a kind of clueless face value that all is well. If one actually learns about such subjects through research and serious study, one will find much that is revolting, that fills one with a kind of hatred and that one finds contemptible.
It's much like the inherent flaw, among many, in multiculturalism. As the great Mark Steyn has said, multiculturalism absolves you from learning anything about any other culture at all. You just feel good about them and go to the restaurants! Rather right on the money, methinks.
But certain sections of our PC Left infected, smiley faced, totalitarian and fascistically inclined authorities, are either assuming one will not look into the facts, and that the facts will all be mostly positive, or they themselves are so stupidly ignorant and recklessly careless with our freedom, that they have not followed the logic through to the bitter end. And the end can only be bitter, for us.
Or have they a plan? Then it can only be a dark one, can it not? Such as in Jonah Goldberg's book '[Left] Liberal Fascism'.
The only people who should be held to account for this criminal law are those who framed and passed it.
“Under the Commonwealth Criminal Code treason has two aspects.
Section 80.1 of the Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) makes it an offence to cause the death of, or harm to, the Sovereign, the heir apparent, the Governor-General or the Prime Minister.
It also encompasses levying war against the Commonwealth of Australia and assisting an enemy at war with Australia”. caslon.
It is now theoretically impossible to discuss honestly, empirically and with a virtual relentless Himalaya of evidential fact, the harsh reality of Islam, its methods and goals. By default, this is a highly refined act that seeks to weaken the true patriot. How is this not treason? Ah, the patriot. Tell me it is not entirely fashionable to denigrate such a person? Yes, we should apparently trust the traitorous and fifth column.
“Oran's Dictionary of the Law (1983) defines treason as: "...[a]...citizen's actions to help a foreign government overthrow, make war against, or seriously injure the [parent nation]." In many nations, it is also often considered treason to attempt or conspire to overthrow the government, even if no foreign country is aided or involved by such an endeavour”. Wikipedia.
An act of treason is the desire and action to overthrow the state. A gagged and cowed state is always going to be easier to deal with. There was no serious evidence at all that anyone has been seriously threatened or harmed without this stupid law. Why was it brought in? What is the real purpose of such a profoundly serious imposition and gross reduction on freedom of speech and freedom in general? The people that pushed for this are smiley faced control freaks and they will destroy us all, including the many decent and regular Muslims who have fled theocratic fascist states.
Islamism is and has always been, an insurrectionist doctrine that has as its core, the absolute will to overthrow any state. And it has clearly done this many times already. In fact, it is virtually the only way Islam has ever come to power. To a true Muslim, everything outside of Islam is blasphemy and any deception is allowed to conter it, and therefore this is the key to why any act is permissible. Any act.
This is rationalised quite ingeniously by the Koranic idea of deception, or Taquiyaa, and that anything that happens is Allah’s will, from lies and beheadings, to bombings and the use of nuclear weapons.
And thus the imposture of our dhimmi legislators is a total fraud. Because sports, what they are saying in essence, is that the understanding and empirical insight of every courageous Muslim dissident, feminist, activist, journalist, apostate risking death, child rights advocate, gay rights advocate and refugee from Islamism etc, etcetera, all have no legitimacy whatsoever. [Ed: Or any critic of Christianity, Hinduism, Buddhism or anything etc, for that matter.]
Because my dear reader, no serious critic of the facts of Islam can ever have any legitimacy or rights before the law. In short, the people who passed this phony, anti-Democratic and insidious Socialist totalitarian law perhaps don’t really give a fuck about Muslims, or Christians and Jews for that matter. It is like all Leftism; nothing but posture. They want to very much to control us all via state power, and to smile and applaud as we all go down in flames, just like in France and Britain.
Nope, how can such boobs claim to care about the Jewish people or the defence of Israel? Under this sick and suicidal law, the reality of what is required for the survival of Israel and the West, would be considered against the law. How does one fight an aggressive and relentless enemy such as Islamic fundamentalism, without being able to even speak or communicate in anyway about it? Are we not at war with Islamism? Yes, we are and not terror, which is merely a tactic, not the driving force.
Not speaking honestly and openly about Islam is the same as fighting Imperial Japan and avoiding serious discussion of Bushido, Shintoism and Emperor worship, for the insane fear of offending the Japanese. Er, my wife is Japanese by the way, not that there's anything wrong with that!
No writer I know of is trying to do anything except what many writers, artists and the clear minded have nearly always done. And this includes many Muslim ones. And today as I've said before, that is attempting to honour the Socratic and empirical truth in the midst of dhimmi assisted chaos.
Our secular and allegedly Democratic government are telling us what to think, feel, reason, know, understand and say about theological matters tha point at our own survival! Think what that mean’s? In practice, it means that the only group to be prosecuted so far is a Christian Church for, and I kid you not, quoting from the Koran. Big as they say, ‘effing surprise.
Even with the almost criminal and pervasive PC Left control of much of our media, schools and government, one day it will be impossible to any longer deny the factual threat of Islamism, though it may indeed be too late by then, as it may be already...
"There is no room for play in Islam. It is deadly serious about everything." Ayatollah Khomeini.
Er, why do I feel that’s not really much of a challenge for the average Islamist loon?
"All those against the revolution must disappear and quickly be executed". Ayatollah Khomeini.
I believe we are perhaps indeed doomed. Frankly, may your God go with you, but I'm afraid you'll have to jerk yourself off. No, really.